Is Blair Being Ransomed?

[Anno]

The links between Blair and Gaddafi are back in the News today but the language is getting stronger.

"Blair's Secret Mettings with Gaddafi" says The Telegraph LINK (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8771192/Libya-Tony-Blair-and-Col-Gaddafis-secret-meetings.html)

Now given Murdoch Jnr is back in the dock and his daddy owns The Telegraph this is very interesting.

Perhaps behind the scenes Blair (and therefore the War in Iraq, Robin Cook's death, Dr Kelly's death etc) is being held ransom by Murdoch Inc? They always say the worst person to have as an enemy is an ex-best friend. How much does Murdoch know and how dirty will he get if they try to take his monopoly away?

If the Government orders his monopoly broken up and gets to decide who takes over (like they did with the banks) then they will essentially control a massive amount of the World Media and make a few of their mates richer.

If Murdoch wants to, he could bring the whole system down by telling all he knows.

Interesting times.

[ViralSpiral]

You know what Anno? Divide and conquer...... Here some tell-tale signs



The letters and emails, found by The Sunday Telegraph, show Mr Blair held secret talks with Gaddafi in the months before Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was freed from a British jail.

"These new meetings between Mr Blair and Gaddafi are disturbing, and details of what was discussed should now be made public. I am astonished Tony Blair continued to have meetings like this out of office."

The documents will also add fuel to suggestions made last year by Gaddafi’s son, Saif, that Mr Blair had advisory links to the Libyan government and the Libyan Investment Authority, which controls a £41 billion fund

Mr Blair has made a fortune since leaving Downing Street through speaking engagements and consultancy deals largely set up in the Middle East and the US. His personal wealth is estimated at anywhere between £20 million and £60  million.

etc., etc., etc.



They put the puppet on stage, now they want to make sure that he can still dance. As for bringing the system down? Here's hoping....


Anyhoot, Murdoch could call this next drama, the Blair Witch Project ;)

[Lord Sidious]

Part of this will be over the ''conservatives'' being in power.
But I disupte that Muammar is a loon.

[Anno]

Blair Witch lol. Don't forget the other one, Cherie. She earns just as much and is forever turning up in Schools 'spearheading initiatives'.

If we were in Egypt, the Media would be the Priests. As we know, part of their fall was the Priests seizing power from the Kings. Whilst our Kings have been getting weaker, gradually replaced by this special class of idiot 'the politician', the Media have been getting more and more powerful. They've gone from being the Music Makers to becoming the King Makers. This is why I think it's always worth keeping an eye on what they're putting out.

I have a feeling they'll let Blair and Bush die before they bring out the truth, if only to ensure that future recruitment goes well.

[Violet]

The links between Blair and Gaddafi are back in the News today but the language is getting stronger.

"Blair's Secret Mettings with Gaddafi" says The Telegraph LINK (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8771192/Libya-Tony-Blair-and-Col-Gaddafis-secret-meetings.html)

Now given Murdoch Jnr is back in the dock and his daddy owns The Telegraph this is very interesting.

Perhaps behind the scenes Blair (and therefore the War in Iraq, Robin Cook's death, Dr Kelly's death etc) is being held ransom by Murdoch Inc? They always say the worst person to have as an enemy is an ex-best friend. How much does Murdoch know and how dirty will he get if they try to take his monopoly away?

If the Government orders his monopoly broken up and gets to decide who takes over (like they did with the banks) then they will essentially control a massive amount of the World Media and make a few of their mates richer.

If Murdoch wants to, he could bring the whole system down by telling all he knows.

Interesting times.

I've noticed the focus too.

Just not sure about the end goal though. It's not like Blair could be any more inexistent, ruined or humiliated after Iraq and Bush.

So, why all this trouble to ruin a ruined man?

[Billy]

The puppets have all strings attached :nerd:

[Anno]

[...]It's not like Blair could be any more inexistent, ruined or humiliated after Iraq and Bush.[...]

Is that the Real Tony Blair? That image exists only in the mind of the masses. He's earning millions from speaking tours and being a 'peace ambassador' to the Middle East. He has his properties, kids, security team and luxury cars. Do you think he cares what the commoners think?

In 'polite society' it's accepted as all an act. They're all mates behind closed doors, sat in the same clubs and restaurants joking about what the muggles are talking about in their cartoon newspapers.

If he's being put in the firing line it'll be something totally unseen and unknown to us. Until we get a whistleblower from Camp Blair.

The conversion to Catholicism has always fascinated me and I would suspect that would 'mark him out' to certain groups as a justifiable target.

[ViralSpiral]

The conversion to Catholicism has always fascinated me and I would suspect that would 'mark him out' to certain groups as a justifiable target.

and more money?

I recently watched his debate with Christopher Hitchins (infamous atheist) on Religion is a Force for Good in the World. In my view? He failed to convince......


If you're interested: its here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msnKNdo5pPI&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLE6FB0B7203B3601E)

[Anno]

The conversion to Catholicism has always fascinated me and I would suspect that would 'mark him out' to certain groups as a justifiable target.

and more money?

I recently watched his debate with Christopher Hitchins (infamous atheist) on Religion is a Force for Good in the World. In my view? He failed to convince......


If you're interested: its here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msnKNdo5pPI&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLE6FB0B7203B3601E)

I have it on now and even though he's there to talk about God his speech starts with mentioning the number 7. If you look at how much he's aged since he took on the role of PM you have to ask yourself where all that energy went to.

[Violet]

[...]It's not like Blair could be any more inexistent, ruined or humiliated after Iraq and Bush.[...]

Is that the Real Tony Blair? That image exists only in the mind of the masses. He's earning millions from speaking tours and being a 'peace ambassador' to the Middle East. He has his properties, kids, security team and luxury cars. Do you think he cares what the commoners think?

In 'polite society' it's accepted as all an act. They're all mates behind closed doors, sat in the same clubs and restaurants joking about what the muggles are talking about in their cartoon newspapers.

If he's being put in the firing line it'll be something totally unseen and unknown to us. Until we get a whistleblower from Camp Blair.

The conversion to Catholicism has always fascinated me and I would suspect that would 'mark him out' to certain groups as a justifiable target.

The whole theater as opposed to behind the scenes doesn't really matter here. The question is: since he's already out of the spotlight, what's the reason for bringing him back into the spotlight?

[Corncrake]

Anno, the UK Telegraph is not owned by Murdoch - pretty sure it is the Barclay Brothers. I think the Australian Telegraph has links with Murdoch. However, I am sure Murdoch could do a great deal of damage anyway revealing all he knows. He has been such a corrupt force on the political scene for so long.