So in David Wilcocks new interview....

[AMystic3434]

he said that he deserves a Noble Peace Prize for what he has "discovered". Its kind of rediculous dont you think. Has anyone ever really researched the resources he sites all the time. I mean really he is putting himself above Albert Einstein.

[Calz]

he said that he deserves a Noble Peace Prize for what he has "discovered". Its kind of rediculous dont you think. Has anyone ever really researched the resources he sites all the time. I mean really he is putting himself above Albert Einstein.

Lol.

I hear you loud and clear ... but consider what the "O" did to deserve his and perhaps it isn't so rediculous after all???

[Carmody]

I would give David the benefit of the doubt and hope that he is trying to illustrate the insanity of giving a peace prize to Obama, and doing it by stating that he is more deserving than Obama. which he is, from our knowledge and standpoint.

Thus the political insanity and mockery that the Nobel institute is. It is good in some ways but it is also a cover for involved machination. The duality state of it's actuality allows it to be used as a tool against the ignorant.

This is how things are done.

Coming to grips with reality involves dealing with multiple layers at the same time. Writing off David's statement in a simplistic linear fashion, or doing such in any other area insures that one will not advance. Advancing involves the handling of multiple years of existence and understanding at one time.

Until then, one will be at the mercy of their own simplicity of view and understanding.

[Mad Hatter]

A better perspective to have...perhaps...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f61KMw5zVhg

[HORIZONS]

IMHO Avalon should be up for the peace prize! Sounds like a good fit to me :peace:

[onawah]

Hear! Hear! I think Richard Feynman is right on target! The reward of doing one's work as well as one can is reward enough. The old adage "Virtue is its own reward" still holds true.

[Calz]

Don't forget another barometer is Al (global warming) Gore.

We have to chose from "O" ... who did nothing ... to Al ... who lies through his teeth for the dark.

Damn right Avalonians are collectively more worthy than these two "examples".

[Lifebringer]

A lot of 'ego' here now in practice.

Hmmm.... guess it's time to educate and advise about the dangers of ego.

[DeBron]

So did you get anything beneficial out of his interview? If not, why would you put energy into promoting/degrading it? I am not advocating Mr. Wilcock or his assertions for honors. I am simply making a written observation that we sometimes do the very thing we speak against.

Shunning his judgement of himself is also putting yourself in the judge's seat.

On another note, I just had the most delicious sip of cold water. I do not know why it invigorated me so much. It was just FANTASTIC!!

[onawah]

If judgement is all you are seeing in this discussion, that may bear examination in itself.
And if that is all you see, then it only makes sense to take it to the next logical conclusion, which is that you are making a judgement by writing "Shunning his judgement of himself is also putting yourself in the judge's seat. "
And I, in turn, am making a judgement about that, and so on.

But if we are just having a discussion, which is what we aim at on PA, then we are not necessarily judging, we are discussing.
I think it all depends on what mindset you come to it with as to what value you place on it.
Judgement implies condemnation.
But we can discuss, make observations, voice opinions, etc. with compassion, and then it is not condemnation.
Discussion can have various constructive purposes including initiating stronger resolve to do better, to be more observant, more discerning, etc.
We can even do so with enthusiasm or passion, but that does not make it condemnation.


So did you get anything beneficial out of his interview? If not, why would you put energy into promoting/degrading it? I am not advocating Mr. Wilcock or his assertions for honors. I am simply making a written observation that we sometimes do the very thing we speak against.

Shunning his judgement of himself is also putting yourself in the judge's seat.

On another note, I just had the most delicious sip of cold water. I do not know why it invigorated me so much. It was just FANTASTIC!!

[AMystic3434]

I dont think disclosure is coming anytime soon.

[Wind]

Thanks for sharing this very important message.

[DNA]

Wow, so I guess I need to start a thread titled "I'm a hardcore David Wilcock fan".
How is this worth a thread?
Couldn't you have stated this on one of the many "I hate David Wilcock" threads?

[AMystic3434]

Well I see he has hundreds of thousands of views on his videos so he affects alot of people. What david wilcock is doing is dangerous to peoples lives who are so wrapped up in what he is saying that it is affecting there lives. Ive seen it happen.

[eaglespirit]

We Are "Living" Disclosure...
in all ways, shapes and forms, in all facets of our past, present and future lives, right now!
...thought I'd throw that in, whatever may come of this thread!

[Chester]

I love David Wilcock.

He's still a little young but I see great potential in the man. I am the only one I am aware of who interpreted his breakdown boo hoo from his experience of what he perceived as a bona fide "death threat" not as cowardice (which is how some of the more neanderthals amongst the vast sea of humanity took it) but instead as this...

David Wilcock has invested a great deal of his life towards one goal... that he sees humanity achieving what humanity is capable of achieving which is to move into a total, new dynamic of true love for one another and all which would then generate a brand new, fantastic paradigm.

His crying moment was motivated by his fear he would miss the show... and be the next Jesus Christ... sacrificed to "save" humanity. I have been there. Many of us have.

He's gotten over it. He learned (at least he has had the opportunity to learn there's nothing taught be being a martyr).

How many of us have had the balls to even attempt what he's done? How many of us have been able to put together a media machine with the force and effect as he has? How many of us actually have one foot into the fringes of the mainstream media and simultaneously break the news of the Keenan suits (though Ben was ahead of him on this), the Dragon family plans, Drake and Fulford and more... and write and speak his visions of this new paradigm he represents being achieved through what he calls ascension? How he has absorbed and regurgitated the channeled Law of One so eloquently?

How many of us could come anywhere near his achievements and not make mistakes along the way, not generate a messiah complex and not sometimes miss the elephant in the living room as he has recently done?

I give David Wilcock an overall break. I also call him out when I see the man being less than he can be. That is what a true friend does... especially an elder.

BUT, it is no one's fault but the one who pays attention to David Wilcock's emanations as to what they bring home. No one's fault but the followers. No one's fault but each of us that can't see and accept the truth when we look in our own mirrors.

David serves a purpose and does so exactly as he should. David is perfect... perfectly imperfect.

I love David Wilcock... would love to hang with him and would love to meet the real David Wilcock, especially if he wanted to go out late at night when most of the natives are fast asleep.

I wonder if anyone else caught that elephant in the living room? Vivek??? You out there still? Lurking?

[Shade]

Why are there so many threads on David Wilcock? Is there nothing better to have a whinge about? lol. I think it comes down to the fact that I think he truly believes in what he is doing, and people will believe in what they want no matter how many people have a thread that says "it's not going to happen, It's bullsh*t". people will get whatever they want out of it. I like him for pure entertainment. I learn from him in my own way. Mostly in observing how the human psyche works as opposed to actual factual information.

[Chester]

I like him for pure entertainment.

Isn't this precisely what we are all doing here? Entertaining ourselves? Distracting ourselves? Perhaps even teaching ourselves?

Just beware you don't "teach" what David teaches or you could find yourself in a court of law.

I think we'll dub this form of hypocrisy, Wilcockian.

In summery...

Attain access to your higher self, which, if you do... by your very being, you "teach." YET! beware because if you so do, you can be held libel and find yourself subject to civil action at the hands of Divine Cosmos' legal team in the very court system David attains his fame from publicly blasting. hahaha

Wilcockian - David... be warned... I have coined this term - if I see you attempting to use it, I will access my friends in my higher self who will inflict eternal pain and suffering upon your reflective state.

Love your name "Shade"

anyways... I am well aware of the three fingers pointing back at me, but alas, I have found better uses of three fingers... hehe.

[gripreaper]

:p
Wilcockian - David... be warned... I have coined this term - if I see you attempting to use it, I will access my friends in my higher self who will inflict eternal pain and suffering upon your reflective state.

anyways... I am well aware of the three fingers pointing back at me, but alas, I have found better uses of three fingers... hehe.

If I use the term "Wilcocked" , even though it could be argued with some veracity within a court of law of proper venue and subject matter jurisdiction, that a case could potentially be made where there is in fact a cause of action for which relief could be granted by a jury of my peers, who could be summoned to hear all of the relevant facts pertinent to the case, and the grievance could be adjudicated....

It is also possible, and very likely, that, due to the irrefutable "FACT" that the word in question is not exactly the same as the word which you have coined, that I would have the right as well as the privilege to use the possible alleged derivative word in any way I choose without succumbing to the fear of litigation, or any such recourse which may be sought by parties who may, in some alleged way, be allegedly connected to any alleged libel, alleged copyright infringement, alleged plagarization, or are allegedly operating in commerce, or are allegedly governed by the rules of Admiralty, or the alleged World tribunal of the Hague, who may be allegedly injured by my use of the word "Wilcocked" and lay claim to an alleged injury as a result of said alleged derivative.

So, this in your Constructive Notice, under international protocol, that I intend to use the word "Wilcocked" in whatever context, and within whatever venue I so choose, and this is also your Administrative Notice to "Cease and Desist" any further encumbrance of the free and sovereign gripreaper from using such expressions. This is your final Notice.

After this, I'm calling the military and my ET friends! :p

[Chester]

Thank God, we are all unique - there is only ONE gripreaper. WoW! dude - I still pull up your various "Hitler" parodies when I feel a little down. They always do the trick. - Chester

[ThePythonicCow]

I dont think disclosure is coming anytime soon.

Couldn't you have stated this on one of the many "I hate David Wilcock" threads?

Why are there so many threads on David Wilcock?

AMystic3434 - I merged your latest Wilcock thread with a similar one you started last year :).

[gripreaper]

Don't forget another barometer is Al (global warming) Gore.

Al Gore is so full of hot air, he's causing global warming all by himself.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080716083807/uncyclopedia/images/4/48/Fire_Gore.jpg

[Flash]

In this thread, the best post is Al Gore's dragon state picture LOL

I cannot believe that we will still have half a dozen threads putting down David Wilcock. Why not do it on Brezinski, the head of the big banks, some people worthwhile destroying.

We can be so picky grindy at finding faults and zooming on whomever we want, by doing it on the right euh I mean the wrong guys (PTB like), we could find cracks and falts that may help hanging them in the public eye.

Zooming on people trying to find ways to counteract PTB, with their full fledge ego playing out or not, is shooting ourselves on the foot. Duh..... One thread is amply enough to make points and have our opinion across. The rest is, .... well, it is what PTB hopes for.

[Kryztian]

Disclosure will not come because the power that be decide to let us in on there secrets. It will come because circumstances will be that they can no longer create believable lies.

[onawah]

Very good points. Unless someone is obviously a disinfo agent, which I don't think Wilcock is, then it is nothing less than self-destructive to attack people who are doing their best to bring the truth out.
Even if they seem misguided at times, it is too easy to criticize those on the front lines who take much of the flak for the rest of us.
I don't pay that much attention to what DW has to say these days, but then, no one really seems to have much valid insider info to share just now.
But I think he's doing his best.
Perspective is all-important.
Someone who looks really good may not be doing as much actual good as someone who just looks average, but is nevertheless, doing the particular dirty work that needs doing.
DW, like Greer and Hoagland, isn't perfect and makes mistakes, sometimes really big ones, but all in all, they have all given a lot.


In this thread, the best post is Al Gore's dragon state picture LOL

I cannot believe that we will still have half a dozen threads putting down David Wilcock. Why not do it on Brezinski, the head of the big banks, some people worthwhile destroying.

We can be so picky grindy at finding faults and zooming on whomever we want, by doing it on the right euh I mean the wrong guys (PTB like), we could find cracks and falts that may help hanging them in the public eye.

Zooming on people trying to find ways to counteract PTB, with their full fledge ego playing out or not, is shooting ourselves on the foot. Duh..... One thread is amply enough to make points and have our opinion across. The rest is, .... well, it is what PTB hopes for.

[Chester]

In this thread, the best post is Al Gore's dragon state picture LOL

I cannot believe that we will still have half a dozen threads putting down David Wilcock. Why not do it on Brezinski, the head of the big banks, some people worthwhile destroying.

We can be so picky grindy at finding faults and zooming on whomever we want, by doing it on the right euh I mean the wrong guys (PTB like), we could find cracks and falts that may help hanging them in the public eye.

Zooming on people trying to find ways to counteract PTB, with their full fledge ego playing out or not, is shooting ourselves on the foot. Duh..... One thread is amply enough to make points and have our opinion across. The rest is, .... well, it is what PTB hopes for.

Because Wilcock sells himself on being a champion of "the people" while Brezinski just wants to cull most of us. That's why. Because Wilcock might actually get a clue while I feel I would be wasting my time on Brezinski. That's why. Because I care about Wilcock, that's why.

[onawah]

Yes, but there's a difference between constructive criticism and destructive.

[Chester]

Yes, but there's a difference between constructive criticism and destructive.

Isn't that an opinion as to what is what?

[KiwiElf]

If the critiquers/haters of DW & Hoagland etc, had given as much to this community as they have, they might be in a position to criticize - ask yourselves, are YOU always right about everything? (aimed at nobody) - "Lest we forget, no-one is perfect" ;)