Dimitri Khalezov

[ktlight]

Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
- Dimitri Khalezov background
- Planes and explosions
- Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
- Nuclear detonations explained
- WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

Part 1 vNuKAdGlxFo

In this Part 2, Dimitri explains:
- WTC 7
- Ground Zero definition
- Pentagon missile attack in detail
- Seismic readings
- 911 media manipulation
- F93 crash in Shanksville, PA
- Cell phone calls
- Hijackers
- 911 rescue workers and illness
- Ground Zero cleanup

Part 2 c39O-ftZboU

[Bo Atkinson]

I would love to see links to confirm some of these assertions of Dimitri Khalezov. This looks like the interesting video of years ago. I searched around the web then and now for more evidence.

http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/02/911-haunts-american-conscience/#
This image link shows a hole much less than 70+ meters deep.

https://plus.google.com/108602963659081624246/posts/6DQfz7qvnkZ
This video shows more views, however what signs here suggest a nuked site?


Worse still, why doesn't Khalezov explain how his version of nuke-mechanics starts destruction at the top of the towers and proceeds downwards? When he says the nuke device was 70+ meters below the surface. Countless videos show tower demolition started at the top and proceeded downwards (unlike Building 7).

What seems very clear is that the instigators would indeed to employ "decoy" devices and exhaustive disinfo tactics (plus all the other weird happenings today) .

Also where are the links to show more about the international agreements to allow these intentionally built in demolition nukes, within cities? (This seemed like a major premise of his).

[ktlight]

I would love to see links to confirm some of these assertions of Dimitri Khalezov. This looks like the interesting video of years ago. I searched around the web then and now for more evidence.

http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/02/911-haunts-american-conscience/#
This image link shows a hole much less than 70+ meters deep.

https://plus.google.com/108602963659081624246/posts/6DQfz7qvnkZ
This video shows more views, however what signs here suggest a nuked site?


Worse still, why doesn't Khalezov explain how his version of nuke-mechanics starts destruction at the top of the towers and proceeds downwards? When he says the nuke device was 70+ meters below the surface. Countless videos show tower demolition started at the top and proceeded downwards (unlike Building 7).

What seems very clear is that the instigators would indeed to employ "decoy" devices and exhaustive disinfo tactics (plus all the other weird happenings today) .

Also where are the links to show more about the international agreements to allow these intentionally built in demolition nukes, within cities? (This seemed like a major premise of his).

This might prove helpful: CpPNQoTlacU

"Here's some vintage USSR propaganda showing us how they extinguished a gas leak fire. The same technique could be used for the oil leak in the gulf. The Russians used nukes to put out fires like this a total of 5 times."