Manningham-Buller, MI5 and Mind Control.

[TelosianEmbrace]

I uncovered this blog on one of my many net explorations. Reader discretion is advised, as some of the info revealed on the inner workings of MI5, including but not limited to mind control programming, torture and worse, is gut churning. There are multiple revelations, particularly in the comments section, for most posters are well informed insiders. It is a rather long entry, but well worth the read for the ground it covers and the particularly candid and insightful comments.
I feel it is better to be informed of the sadistic inner workings of MI5 and the Royal Family than to turn a blind eye. One day we as a society will all have to face what has been done behind the scenes in order to cleanse, forgive, and heal.

http://elizamanninghambuller.blogspot.com/2006/12/eliza-manningham-buller.html

[ktlight]

This is so interesting. TE. Thanks very much for posting.

[TelosianEmbrace]

No worries (As we say in Aus.) ktlight. One of the more mundane observations is the Rowling didn't write the Harry Potter series. Some of the other highlights-
*Princess Anne was present in 'mirroring' mind control programming
*An ICI paint machine colour coding as coding for the Royal Genome Project
*A cookbook detailing the updated Illuminati structure in code
*Contains various mind control programming numbers and phrases
*Underground tunnel access points
*Directions to a Royal 'Smuggling' farm at Little Oakley, and being spooked by invisible helicopters
*Templar Programming in relation to EMF waves
Just touching on a handful of the many pieces of intriguing information.
My bedtime. Bye for now.

[ktlight]

No worries (As we say in Aus.) ktlight. One of the more mundane observations is the Rowling didn't write the Harry Potter series. Some of the other highlights-
*Princess Anne was present in 'mirroring' mind control programming
*An ICI paint machine colour coding as coding for the Royal Genome Project
*A cookbook detailing the updated Illuminati structure in code
*Contains various mind control programming numbers and phrases
*Underground tunnel access points
*Directions to a Royal 'Smuggling' farm at Little Oakley, and being spooked by invisible helicopters
*Templar Programming in relation to EMF waves
Just touching on a handful of the many pieces of intriguing information.
My bedtime. Bye for now.

And how angry the USA ILL was that the queen and the British Illuminati took down the towers, and that she apologised and said she would never do that again!!!!!!!!!!!

[58andfixed]

The information at the web-site for Richard Tomlinson doesn't match up with information about him on Wikipedia.

It could be a site rich for disinfo, with some clues buried in there about its deceptive nature that would take years to unravel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Tomlinson

Fascinating for the easily distracted.

Wouldn't solve anything of value, and probably just another time consuming production of those that have much time for the bending of paper clips, PowerPoint presentations and web-site full of it.

Just a quick take.

- 58

[TelosianEmbrace]

Hi 58. I would not reference Wikipedia for anything that is even slightly controversial. They are a disinformation front. Let me see...how to illustrate this. How about the Wikipedia version of 9/11? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11 In their version "19 terrorists from the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda hijacked four passenger jets". We all know that's not true, now don't we?
For verification it would be good to find data that cross references what is found in the blog. I am not saying everything is valid, but also not dismissing it out of hand.

[58andfixed]

Maybe, maybe not. There is a lack of consistency.

I am also "... not saying everything is valid, but also not dismissing it out of hand."

I am adverse to blanket statements, and simplification into positions of duality. ["Either you are for the terrorists, or you are not."]

I agree one needs to exercise caution with anything, even on Wikipedia, however maybe you'd like to check out other sources for the job history about Richard Tomlinson, and then compare the [3,4,5, ...] web-sites.

There are loads of web-sites that really don't get the browser any further ahead in making sense out of the events on this planet, a nest of confusion -- that is the essence of my point.

HTH.

- 58


I would not reference Wikipedia for anything that is even slightly controversial.

In their version "19 terrorists from the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda hijacked four passenger jets". We all know that's not true, now don't we?

For verification it would be good to find data that cross references what is found in the blog. I am not saying everything is valid, but also not dismissing it out of hand.