OWS Needs to 'Target Real Enemies' Or Face Irrelevancy..!

[jackovesk]

OWS Needs to Target Real Enemies Or Face Irrelevancy

October 6, 2011

Chris Burris, writing for Lew Rockwell’s website yesterday, makes a good point about the Occupy Wall Street movement – they are barking up the wrong tree.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/3208708-3x2-700x467.jpg

Democracy? How about a constitutionally limited republic?

Instead of occupying a park outside of Wall Street, they should march en masse to 33 Liberty Street. That’s where the New York Fed is located. In addition, they should take their chants and drums to the Harold Pratt House on 58 E. 68th Street at Park Avenue. The Council On Foreign Relations does business at that address.

If the Occupiers had a clue, they would go after the power elite instead of their workers down on Wall Street.

“But they won’t be led to confront the gods on Mount Olympus by their Judas goats and media shills,” Burris writes with an appropriate degree of sarcasm. “David Rockefelle­r, Pete Peterson, Warren Buffett, David Koch and Henry Kissinger might be held up from lunch at 21.”

In addition to Rockefeller and the CFR, protesters in Washington, DC, should immediately march on the North American headquarters of the Trilateral Commission, situated at 1156 Fifteen Street, NW, and make their demands known.

It would also be helpful to protest the Bilderberg Group, the cabal of ultra-rich global elitists who plot our future in secret. Bilderberg does not have an office per se, but with a little footwork I am sure dedicated OWS activists could find the homes and offices of its core members. Here’s a list of the steering committee that arranges the elite organization’s annual meetings. Here is the 2012 list of Bilderberg attendees.

And here are a few more globalist organizations that need to be targeted by peaceful OWS protesters:

Atlantic Council of the United States

1101 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 463-7226

“A powerful body that supports NATO’s empowerment as a global force and deeper ties between the European political community and the United States.”

Bretton Woods Committee

1726 M Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036

“A club of top ranking political leaders and financial players who seek a revamped international financial system built on the foundations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.”

Brookings Institute

1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW,
Washington, DC 20036

“A major, Washington DC-based policy think tank that has a long history of promoting regional and international governance.”

Center for Strategic and International Studies

1800 K St NW # 400
Washington D.C., DC 20006-2230
(202) 887-0200

“CSIS is an extremely influential policy group and research body that has promoted North American/hemispheric integration, and the development of global governance structures.”

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

1779 Massachusetts Avenue Northwest
Washington, DC 20036-2109
(202) 483-7600

“The CEIP is a global think tank with offices in Washington DC, Moscow, Beijing, Beirut, and Brussels. It supports international approaches to security and political issues, and offers advice to the leaders of the world. CEIP promotes global collective security – the idea that international security should be guaranteed and maintained by a world structure.”

International Institute for Strategic Studies

2121 K Street NW,
Suite 801, Washington, DC

“A British research group that focuses on global security and military concerns. The IISS has been a supporter of an empowered international system of governance.”

The above organization descriptions are taken from A Leadership Review of the Barack. Obama Administration, published by the August Review.

Obama and Biden have expressed sympathy for the OWS movement, but don’t let them fool you – Goldman Sachs put Obama in office and his administration is rife with globalists and CFR and Trilateral operatives.


Tim Geithner, Ben Bernanke, Susan Rice, Paul Volcker, Richard Haass, Alan Greenspan, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, Robert Zoelick – these are people directly or indirectly connected to Obama who are dyed-in-the-wool globalists working in unison to sell out our national sovereignty and impoverish Americans by sending their jobs to slave gulags in the third world. They represent the Federal Reserve, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, and the secretive Bilderberg Group of elite globalists.

They need to be the ones targeted, not nameless traders and stock brokers on Wall Street.

The OWS needs to get it together – and soon. It looks like it is already being sold out to large unions that helped put the globalist sock puppet and teleprompter reader Obama in office – and they are gearing up to do it again.

If the OWS movement allows itself to be merged into the “progressive” Borg hive, it will never recover. It will be sold out and turned into an establishment cheering section for Democrats just like the once proud Libertarian Tea Party was sold down the river by establishment Republicans.

It needs to go after the real enemies of humanity listed in part above. Short of correcting its aim, the OWS is destined to become another useless and ineffective showboating movement bowing to corporatized labor like the SEIU and following the lead of establishment and foundation funded careerist Democrats.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ows-needs-to-target-real-enemies-or-face-irrelevancy.html

PS - A 'Big Kudos' to all of those Freedom-Loving-Souls out there who are at least 'Doing Something'..!

We too feel your pain and Salute You All and back you 110%...

[jackovesk]

More Intel...




MoveOn.org Hijacks ‘Occupy’ To Push Obama Tax Agenda (http://www.prisonplanet.com/moveon-org-hijacks-occupy-to-push-obama-tax-agenda.html)
Paul Joseph Watson | Soros-funded outfit wants to turn OWS protesters into Obama campaign re-election tool.

Progressives seek to co-opt diverse ‘Occupy DC’ movement (http://www.prisonplanet.com/progressives-seek-to-co-opt-diverse-%e2%80%98occupy-dc%e2%80%99-movement.html)
Neil Munro | They’re snatching the media’s focus away from a real wave of public concern about the downward slide of the economy.

Idiotic Marxists, Communists & Socialists Are Discrediting ‘Occupy Wall Street’ (http://www.prisonplanet.com/idiotic-marxists-communists-socialists-are-discrediting-occupy-wall-street.html)
Prison Planet | There needs to be a massive educational effort focused on the real causes of the economic collapse.

DC organiser admits to paying ‘Occupy DC’ protesters (http://www.prisonplanet.com/dc-organizer-admits-to-paying-%e2%80%98occupy-dc%e2%80%99-protesters.html)
BREITBART.TV | “Some of them are volunteers. Some of them aren’t. I can’t identify them. I’m not going to get into an identification game.”

Occupy Wall Street: Who Wants to Hijack the Movement?

Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
TARPLEY.net
October 7, 2011

http://tarpley.net/images/left.jpg http://tarpley.net/images/right.jpg

Media spokesmen for the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations claimed that their operation is totally transparent, with everything subject to democratic discussion in a general assembly of all comers. But eyewitness reports from experienced observers on the ground in lower Manhattan indicate a much different reality behind these bland assurances. Forces appeared to be at work behind the scenes to manipulate the protest movement into a posture of supporting the presidential candidacy of Wall Street puppet Obama.

Eyewitness observers suggest that the deliberations of the general assembly are largely a diversion, and that real power is being increasingly concentrated in the hands of about 20 mysterious and anonymous individuals who appear to make up a kind of covert steering committee that pulls the strings on the general assembly, or else goes around it completely. The members of this cadre of mysterious operatives are not as young as the average demonstrator. The secret leadership is made up of people ranging in age from 25 to over 40, with the older ones occupying the key posts. Many of them appear to be active duty or recently retired military.

A Covert Steering Committee Behind the Scenes?

Attempts to ascertain the names of the behind-the-scenes leaders are met with stonewalling. When pressed to reveal her identity, one female leader gave her name as “Mary MIA.” Another gave his name as “Tony POW.”

If the leaders of OWS want to be transparent, let them make public at least the full names of the people who are actually running the show. No one wants to join a movement with anonymous leaders.

Observers have noticed that almost all of the likely members of the secret steering committee disappear from view between 4 and 6 p.m. each afternoon, right before the opening of the general assembly, for which they then re-appear. It is assumed that they are attending a closed-door meeting, but the general assembly is not officially informed of this fact.

Strange Bedfellows

Two individuals who appear to belong to the higher levels of the pecking order in Zuccotti Park are pictured above. The one on the left calls himself “Brendan.” When newspaper correspondents and other media representatives arrive, he is often the one who handles relations with them. “Brendan” looks old enough to be the father of many of the demonstrators.

The person pictured above on the right is a frequent speaker in the general assembly. He also has a role in relations with the press. According to one protester, he may have connections to the US military, but this has not been confirmed. Is his do-rag or bandana a fashion statement, or something else?

Who are these people? Who appointed them? To whom are they accountable?
Who Invited Michael Moore?

The general assembly is supposed to approve all major decisions. In reality, it appears to be occupied with endless deliberations about trivia while the really big decisions are being made someplace else. A case in point are the invitations which have obviously been extended to a whole series of discredited left liberal figures, many of them deeply implicated in inflicting the Obama presidency and continued Wall Street rule on our nation. Michael Moore, Naomi Klein, Mike Myers, and left-IMF ideologue Joseph Stiglitz have all appeared, and a visit by Noam Chomsky, a devoted supporter of the Bush theory of terrorism, is reportedly in the works. Eyewitnesses have reported that most demonstrators were not happy with the presence of the millionaire Michael Moore, who was using the demonstrations as props for his usual routine of self-promotion. But these objections carried no weight. Regular participants in the general assembly report that they were never consulted about whether to invite these left liberals. It is therefore a good guess that the invitations were actually issued by the secret steering committee. The general idea is once again to reduce the protest movement to a mere auxiliary in the effort to get Obama reelected.

The Consensus Straitjacket

The members of the secret steering committee have taken a leading role in imposing the unwieldy and time-consuming formalism of always reaching a consensus in the general assembly, meaning that any significant opposition can block the implementation of urgent actions. A simple up or down majority vote is not enough. (The last governing assembly of any major nation to give each member a veto over the actions of the whole body was the aristocratic Polish Diet of the 18th century, which was so dysfunctional that it led to Poland being obliterated from the map of Europe – not an example to be imitated.)

The consensus method provides immense comfort to the predatory speculators of Wall Street, since it virtually guarantees that no potent and controversial strategy to break the power of finance capital can emerge. Indeed, it guarantees that absolutely nothing will be able to emerge in an emergency after a rapid turn in the overall situation. The US Congress is paralyzed by a minority, but the consensus rules of the general assembly mean that it can be paralyzed by a tiny clique bent on sabotage. In the background, the covert steering committee is busy creating a series of faits accomplis.

The deliberations of the general assembly are one big filibuster. On October 4, much of the session was taken up with an agonized discussion of whether to buy or knit and sew sleeping bags as the nights became colder. Right-wing commentators hostile to the protests had a field day using this grotesque scene to mock the entire movement.

Those who run the General assembly sessions are known as facilitators. The relation of these facilitators to the secret steering committee is being investigated.

The OWS Declaration: Not One Concrete Demand for Americans

While the General assembly is occupied with questions like what to order for lunch as part of the shipments of free food that mysteriously appear at the demonstration site, the vital issue of program is left to a subcommittee. On October 5, the Olbermann evening news featured a reading of the Occupy Wall Street Declaration, written by protesters Ryan Hoffman and Lex Rendon. This document does not offer an analysis of the current economic crisis. Rather, it represents a laundry list of complaints, many valid and some spurious. Most important, this document contains not one concrete demand, measure, or program point on which the protesters are willing to pledge that they will be fighting for the interests of the American people. In that sense, it is a document of moral and intellectual impotence. It whines and complains, but it will do nothing to combat the widespread suspicion of the OWS movement felt in many quarters because of the Soros endorsement.

Economic demands are absolutely vital. The movement needs to offer specific solutions for the grave abuses and economic tragedies which are plaguing working people. These demands acquire a material power as they gain mass support. To get support from the inner-city ghetto, from the farm belt, from women, from labor, from the elderly, their vital concerns must be directly addressed. These groups absolutely do not need more analysis telling them how bad things are. They already know that. They need to see a social force which is ready to take leadership in accomplishing radical reforms -or else the revolution, as the case may be.

Student Loan Amnesty Now Paid for by 1% Wall Street Sales Tax

One obvious demand which needs to be included is an immediate amnesty or cancellation of all outstanding student loans. The zombie banks which have been bailed out by the United States government can and should eat their part of the $1 trillion which will have to be written off. The loans guaranteed by the government can be offset by new tax income from a 1% Wall Street sales tax on all financial turnover, including stocks, bonds, and derivatives. Estimates of the additional revenue from a Wall Street sales tax of this type start in the hundreds of billions of dollars and go into the trillions. The proceeds could be split between the federal government and the states, for the purposes of maintaining the social safety net and vital public services. Ordinary people pay sales tax, while bankers pay nothing. One bright spot in the demonstrations has been the presence of the nurses’ union, which has been militantly advocating just such a Tobin tax or financial transactions tax. Student loan amnesty now paid for by a 1% Wall St sales tax is a demand which could blow the lid off US politics once and for all.

Economic program is a science. It requires the mastery of many fields. Serious, intelligent people need to put their gifts to work mastering the science of economic program as part of their social responsibility to the American people.

The Indignados of Madrid: Europe’s Biggest Failures

According to reliable reports, the consensus method was imposed via the steering committee preparing for the demonstrations during the summer months. Individuals claiming to be students from Spain and Greece arrived and joined the steering committee, where they advocated the crippling consensus method. They pointed to the general assemblies held by the indignados of Madrid, a movement of youthful protesters concerned about austerity measures, youth unemployment, the excessive power of bankers, and economic injustice. But, even compared with Tunis, Cairo, Athens, and Reykjavík, the Madrid indignados must be judged as the biggest failure of them all, because of their total inability to oust the “socialist” IMF agent Zapatero, the enforcer of genocidal austerity demanded by the banks, or to block any of the austerity cuts. The indignados had no positive impact whatsoever on Spanish politics. Why imitate failure? This is the side of the current protests which Wall Street predator George Soros was happy to endorse this week.

A New International Otpor?

Observers are reminded of Otpor, the organization created by the CIA and the National Endowment for Democracy for the purpose of overthrowing the Serbian strongman Milosevic in 2000. After that color revolution had occurred, the leaders of Otpor turned their experience into an immensely lucrative consultancy under which they were assigned by the CIA and the NED to Ukraine, Georgia, Lebanon, and Egypt to train the operatives that would overthrow national leaders which the US wanted to get rid of. Have indignados veterans opened a new counterinsurgency franchise of this kind?

The “Theoretician”: Anarchist Peter Gelderloos, Fetishist of Consensus

Last night Occupy Wall Street spokesman Matthew Swaye appeared on the Ed Show of MSNBC, and announced that the main theoretician of the consensus straitjacket is anarchist Peter Gelderloos, author of the book Consensus. Swaye praised the “intricate process” of the general assemblies, where votes are expressed by thumbs up or thumbs down. Gelderloos, who is almost unknown in the United States, was arrested in Spain in 2007, and during his trial became a sort of minor celebrity in certain circles there. This may explain why the indignados leaders were indoctrinated with his belief structure. Gelderloos’s system is a Procrustean bed on which not many in their right mind will be willing to lie down.

Television appearances by protesters Kelly Heresy, Tyler Combelic, Ryan Hoffman, Lex Rendon and Swaye in recent days all have one common characteristic – their absolute inability to formulate a single demand or program which would speak to the urgent needs of the broader American public. Instead, many of them used the few precious minutes they had extolling the virtues of the imbecilic consensus model as the basis for some future Utopia. Hard-pressed working people do not have time for these pipe dreams. American working people urgently need help in finding a job, in blocking a foreclosure, in obtaining health care, and in getting out from under the crushing burden of student loans. Who chose these spokespersons?

So far, the current Wall Street protests have offered these embattled Americans virtually nothing but an unfulfilled promissory note.

Sam Seder, a former broadcaster for the failed Air America network and Obama backer, has argued that the movement should never come up with a program of concrete demands. This is the choice that would suit Obama. Unless and until the protest movement tells the American people what it is willing to fight for on their behalf, it risks becoming a mere collection of roustabouts for the Obama reelection campaign.

The stakes are much too high to let this happen. If this movement fails, fascism may be much closer than many people think.

It must succeed, and to succeed it immediately requires a series of intelligible goals.

http://tarpley.net/2011/10/07/occupy-wall-street-who-wants-to-hijack-the-movement/

[etm567]

They are going after the elite. Just like they keep making the point that the police are not part of the problem, they are just more of the 99 percent. It's the one percent, which I think means the Elite, that they are going after. I have no trouble whatsoever understanding who it is that are they after, and I think anyone who says so is disingenuous and is operating from a political motivation.

[etm567]

Why do folks on the right, which is traditionally considered to be much closer to fascism than the left, have such a hard time accepting that people who consider themselves liberals, on the left, who say they are on the left -- and who have been having a very hard time resolving their feelings about Obama's and much of the disappointment around him -- believe in freedom, and are interested in the well being of the working class and the middle class, and are also opposed to the Bilderbergers and the Council on Foreign Relations and the rest of it?

And as far as Noam Chomsky being a Bush family supporter -- I haven't read any Noam Chomsky lately, but that accusation sounds a little bit hollow to me. I find it quite difficult to believe.

It has always pained me to see that there is a large area of agreement between the left and the more libertarian part of the right, especially as far as personal liberties are involved. The left thinks government should indeed stay out of our private lives, including the bedroom, and keep churches out of politics, but believes there is a role for government to play in regulating, in regulating, that means making rules and laws to control the corporations. That is one of the parts of government that makes government big, it regulates! Those regulations are to protect us, and it is the defeat of those regulations by the powerful that have caused the mess we are in.

In my admittedly limited understanding, the right is against regulation. They say they want small government, but they let government become large in efforts to regulate people's personal choices, such as concerning religion and abortion. But there are some libertarians who speak out against that, and Ron Paul is one of them. But Ron Paul I think also does not want any part of govcernment to protect the helpless and those in need, people who are taken down by disease or heredity, or mental illness, or protection from racial discrimination, basically, that government should not protect some people from other people who operate out of more selfish motivations. ANd no, I don't buy that selfishness is good, and that selfishness will end up in the end with a good result, if that is what Ayn Rand meant.

So there is this area of agreement, which we cannot seem to recognize and where we cannot come together, and then this vast area which gets really murky to me about the right, because there is so much variation in what seems to be believed there, about the left, about Obama, about regulation and the role of government.

Yes, Obama has disappointed most of us, but many of us fear that he is under pressures from those evil forces you list above that he cannot do what he knows is right, and that is why he appears to be so wishy washy. I can only hope that is the case, because returning to rule by the right, such as by the likes of George W. Bush, truly presents the potential for a fascist takeover. Fascists are on the right; socialists are on the left. I don't know where in there personal liberties lie. But I know on the right the corporations traditionally have all the power, or a combination, a merger, of corporations and government, and on the left, regulation is allowed to protect individuals from over-reaching by the powerful.

I am afraid this is not a very coherent reply, and for that I apologize. I hope someone else can more clearly address that area that I'm trying to point out, where the left and the right agree about a thing or two, the Fed among them. But for the right, which to me favors fascism, to attack the left and say that the left will lead to fascism, that makes no sense to me. None at all. Fascism is on the right.

[jackovesk]

Why do folks on the right, which is traditionally considered to be much closer to fascism than the left, have such a hard time accepting that people who consider themselves liberals, on the left, who say they are on the left -- and who have been having a very hard time resolving their feelings about Obama's and much of the disappointment around him -- believe in freedom, and are interested in the well being of the working class and the middle class, and are also opposed to the Bilderbergers and the Council on Foreign Relations and the rest of it?

And as far as Noam Chomsky being a Bush family supporter -- I haven't read any Noam Chomsky lately, but that accusation sounds a little bit hollow to me. I find it quite difficult to believe.

It has always pained me to see that there is a large area of agreement between the left and the more libertarian part of the right, especially as far as personal liberties are involved. The left thinks government should indeed stay out of our private lives, including the bedroom, and keep churches out of politics, but believes there is a role for government to play in regulating, in regulating, that means making rules and laws to control the corporations. That is one of the parts of government that makes government big, it regulates! Those regulations are to protect us, and it is the defeat of those regulations by the powerful that have caused the mess we are in.

In my admittedly limited understanding, the right is against regulation. They say they want small government, but they let government become large in efforts to regulate people's personal choices, such as concerning religion and abortion. But there are some libertarians who speak out against that, and Ron Paul is one of them. But Ron Paul I think also does not want any part of govcernment to protect the helpless and those in need, people who are taken down by disease or heredity, or mental illness, or protection from racial discrimination, basically, that government should not protect some people from other people who operate out of more selfish motivations. ANd no, I don't buy that selfishness is good, and that selfishness will end up in the end with a good result, if that is what Ayn Rand meant.

So there is this area of agreement, which we cannot seem to recognize and where we cannot come together, and then this vast area which gets really murky to me about the right, because there is so much variation in what seems to be believed there, about the left, about Obama, about regulation and the role of government.

Yes, Obama has disappointed most of us, but many of us fear that he is under pressures from those evil forces you list above that he cannot do what he knows is right, and that is why he appears to be so wishy washy. I can only hope that is the case, because returning to rule by the right, such as by the likes of George W. Bush, truly presents the potential for a fascist takeover. Fascists are on the right; socialists are on the left. I don't know where in there personal liberties lie. But I know on the right the corporations traditionally have all the power, or a combination, a merger, of corporations and government, and on the left, regulation is allowed to protect individuals from over-reaching by the powerful.

I am afraid this is not a very coherent reply, and for that I apologize. I hope someone else can more clearly address that area that I'm trying to point out, where the left and the right agree about a thing or two, the Fed among them. But for the right, which to me favors fascism, to attack the left and say that the left will lead to fascism, that makes no sense to me. None at all. Fascism is on the right.

Thanks for that etm567,

Personally, I could'nt give two hoots about the Left, the Right, the Centre, whatever it may be..!

I just want 'Honest & Transparent Governing For All'..!

Its the Corrupt NWO Elite & MSM who Label these positions under the disguise of a 'False Left/Right Paradigm' to keep 'The People' from coming together as One..!

It is yet another 'Hoax' in order those who write the Rules & Regulations to 'CONTROL & ENSLAVE US'...Period..!

[jcocks]

Screw the left, right, centre, etc etc ad infinitum. Close your eyes for a moment, go within, and ask your inner voice what it thinks of the situation, and be prepared to LISTEN...

In the end, it's all politics, and all politics will fail. The meek with inherit the earth, and a lot sooner than you think. And...Hey, guess what? I've never met a truly meek politician (I guess they don't last long enough in the profession).

The truth will be known soon enough, and when it does become known these bastards better watch out because they'll have to answer for what they've done to the human race for so long..... That's an aweful lot of karma there, let me tell you.