Apollo Zero [Full Movie]

[ktlight]

A fair use film discussing the Apollo Moon Landings.

"MOONTARDS are the only ones trolling this film. It's like they really have large doubts as to the apollo missions themselves & want to debunk anything&everything so their faulty belief system isn't thrown in chaos & proven to be a complete LIE. lol America is so ****ing stupid & brainwashed. The evening news is Propaganda Central & they're too stupid to see it. The CIA(government scum) has infiltrated media for decades & constantly control the news.

NX-laeKljTo

[peace]

call me a "coward and a liar," after being warned to get away, i'll probably hit you in the face as well.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

(but very interesting video, by the way)

[Calz]

Some related interesting material. Too many photos to post so take the link if interested.


Apollo 17 - Proof it was Kubricked

by Ted Twietmeyer

Please read all of the text before reviewing the photos. This text provides additional information that you probably will not otherwise notice when reviewing the photos. If there is material that others have also discovered, so be it. My research was done using a white room approach. Unless stated otherwise, all ideas, discoveries and facts presented are my own work. It would be appreciated if my inbox is not stuffed with “I found it or so-and-so found it first” nonsense. I will respond to all sensible emails.

I need to admit here that my goal in reviewing Moon walk and rover photos from Apollo 17 was to find possible artifacts. When I found one particular image after many hours of reviewing photos, my research work came to a complete stop.

After reviewing hundreds of Apollo 17 images, I found conclusive proof a stage was definitely used for most, if not all of the Moon surface photos. The entire world has been “Kubricked” for decades. Others in recent years found through image processing that the black sky in Moon walk images is actually a painted backdrop. We shall see that image processing is not even needed to see this.

Over and over in photos taken on the surface of the Moon I continued to find the same irregularities. Keep in mind all these photos were supposedly taken by astronauts who trained and practiced for weeks (their own words) to use a high quality Hasselblad camera.

This camera is completely manual, and requires the astronaut to set the distance to the lens (in feet) before taking each picture. This means the focus of the camera inherently has a limited depth of focus, controlled by the setting in feet. With this is mind, consider the following characteristics this camera will have:

Rocks and objects on the Moon's surface within yards of the rover will be in focus, only if that is what the camera is set for.
Distant objects like a mountain ridges will be in focus, if that is what the camera is set for (such as infinity.)
It is not possible to obtain razor sharp mountain peaks in the distance and sharp focus on rocks only a few yards from the rover at the same time.
And yet, there are more than 100 images that accomplish the impossible with rocks and objects in focus up close, while distant mountain ridges miles away are also razor sharp focus. Forget about the old argument about “stars are not being visible means it's faked.” This argument is invalid because the F-stop setting (iris) had to be set for extremely bright sunlight. Sunlight on the Moon is full brightness like that of outer space and can easily wash out a photo. Starlight is many magnitudes dimmer than sunlight and it makes complete sense stars cannot be seen.

Another question arises ­ are the distant peaks and ridges REALLY that far away? Highly skilled matte painters for Hollywood films have long known how to fool the eye with fake distance, decades before the first Apollo flights were every launched. Old Star Trek TV series and others used this trick all the time to create scenes that could not be filmed in the real world. Matte paintings were often combined with Chroma-key to superimpose backgrounds on small objects.

Chroma-key was commonly used in TV studios to make weather forecasters appear in front of a large map of the country. Any blue color was substituted electronically (or “keyed”) with another image from a different camera or video source. It was long known in the TV news industry that no weatherman or some news reporters should ever wear blue. Today, Chroma-blue has been replaced by green.

I mention all this because in the staged Apollo 17 (and likely other Apollo missions) Chroma-key was not used that we can tell. Keep in mind that in the late 60's and early 70's, Chroma-key was far from perfect.

Older readers may remember early weatherman having parts of their bodies disappear and re-appear in while doing the weather.

I was involved with commercial broadcasting at that time, and Chroma-key was more like a balancing act. When a studio video board operator used Chroma-key, he worked a joystick which was moved around slightly in an attempt to balance the superimposed effect. That was state-of-art 40 years ago ­ at the same time Kubrick did the Apollo work.

If any part of a astronaut disappeared on live video because of a Chroma-key problem, that would have been the end game for NASA. Kubrick wisely crafted his production without using unreliable electronic effects. But to do so requires that everything is constructed life-size, or as big as it can be when crammed into a secret, closed stage housed inside a building.

In reviewing hundreds of Apollo 17 images, I noticed that the same distant mountain peaks appeared in the distance over and over with razor sharpness. Yet at the same time objects on the ground were also quite sharp. The best camera you can buy today cannot do that - almost 40 years later.

What would be most telling of being Kubricked, is to see some part of a studio lighting instrument in a photo. There is a film clip on youtube that shows this in as a rehearsal to make the “One Small Step for Man.” But someone at one time claimed this was shot for a commercial. When I challenged that and asked what commercial, no one came forward to state what company commissioned such a re-enactment.

IMAGE HANDLING Below are a few images of interest I found from Apollo 17. These photos were taken straight from NASA computers, with just one exception - a photo of astronaut gloves in a museum. No image processing has been done to these images unless noted for each one.

Most images were available as low res and high res formats. I show the source image NASA ID number and whether it was in low res or high res. Enlargement are taken from a small clip from a hi-res image of the very same scene to help reduce document size. No sharpening, contrast or color changes, etc... are used since these may introduce unwanted artifacts.

The first group of images shows polygon-shaped craters. What makes these unusual is that scientifically conducted, high speed projectile impact tests of various types and sizes were performed in laboratories to simulate meteor impacts. Results of these tests have shown that impact craters are always round.

... (snip of many photos) ...

There is no doubt that Apollo 17 photos and possibly other Apollo mission photos have been faked.

However ­ this does not indicate we never went to the Moon. I have one first person witness friend of impeccable character who is still alive, and who was there at Cape Kennedy when Apollo 11 was making it's final descent and was buzzed by flying disks (UFOs.) NASA apparently switched the broadcast to the Kubrick production, which is what all of us saw in 1969.

It may be possible that due to some oversight, all the Apollo images were fogged by solar radiation. Due to the historic nature of the Apollo missions (and NASA not wanting to look like the world's biggest idiots and lose funding) many Apollo images were re-created.



http://www.jayweidner.com/Kubricked.html

¤=[Post Update]=¤


call me a "coward and a liar," after being warned to get away, i'll probably hit you in the face as well.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

(but very interesting video, by the way)

You have to feel for the astronauts. Memories allgedly wiped and mind controlled and many of their stories add credence.

[Dawn]

Thank you so much for posting this. I have to say that the 'Appolo Zero' film was extremely difficult to listen to during the last 10 minutes because of the hate and judgement energy directed at the astronauts interviewed. This type of energy creates war and is behind most human conflicts. In my personal life I never stay around anyone who operates from the energy of hate and separation. It actually caused me to question that the film may have been created from lies and overstatements. It is interesting to note that a predominant human behavior in this reality is to decide something is true and then to set out to prove it. Almost anything can be proven with enough focus.

The film does make a very good case however.

And if the moon landing is a lie, then allowing those involved the same respect and love we allow all ourselves for lies and untruths we have been too afraid to correct is the way unwind the energy involved. When you were a child and afraid you would be spanked or have your parents wrath turned upon you did you always tell the truth in every instance? If you say 'yes' you probably aren't telling yourself the truth.

What would you do if you had participated in something to fool the Russians in a cold war and were sworn to secrecy? Would you tell everyone what actually happened if you knew you would be murdered for doing so? What ever answer you give yourself to these questions, it is hard to know what you would do unless faced with the actual circumstances.

[Referee]

I am sorry but he has not done proper research. We have been much further then the moon. The program is just secret. US Space Command.

[ktlight]

I am sorry but he has not done proper research. We have been much further then the moon. The program is just secret. US Space Command.

Except, as wikpedia puts it:

The United States Space Command (USSPACECOM) was a Unified Combatant Command of the United States Department of Defense, created in 1985 to help institutionalize the use of outer space by the United States Armed Forces. The Commander in Chief of U.S. Space Command (CINCUSSPACECOM), with headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado was also the Commander in Chief of the binational U.S.-Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Command (CINCNORAD), and for the majority of time during USSPACECOM’s existence also the Commander of the U.S. Air Force major command Air Force Space Command. Military space operations coordinated by USSPACECOM proved to be very valuable for the U.S.-led coalition in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

The U.S. military has relied on satellite communications, intelligence, navigation, missile warning and weather systems in areas of conflict since at least the early 1990s, including the Balkans, Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. Space systems have since then been considered as indispensable providers of tactical information to U.S. forces.

[Referee]

I am sorry but he has not done proper research. We have been much further then the moon. The program is just secret. US Space Command.

Except, as wikpedia puts it:

The United States Space Command (USSPACECOM) was a Unified Combatant Command of the United States Department of Defense, created in 1985 to help institutionalize the use of outer space by the United States Armed Forces. The Commander in Chief of U.S. Space Command (CINCUSSPACECOM), with headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado was also the Commander in Chief of the binational U.S.-Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Command (CINCNORAD), and for the majority of time during USSPACECOM’s existence also the Commander of the U.S. Air Force major command Air Force Space Command. Military space operations coordinated by USSPACECOM proved to be very valuable for the U.S.-led coalition in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

The U.S. military has relied on satellite communications, intelligence, navigation, missile warning and weather systems in areas of conflict since at least the early 1990s, including the Balkans, Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. Space systems have since then been considered as indispensable providers of tactical information to U.S. forces.

IMO
I think we all have to think outside of the box on this one this is the blackest of the black projects within the US. IMO partly run by the Vatican. IMO
the Military is 100+ years ahead of the consumer at the most expensive level. The top levels of national security in the US have spacecraft and use them all the time. Off world bases mars the moon and beyond as well as jump rooms to these bases. AI super computers that would make the best computer money can buy look like an Atari game system. We can travel to other dimensions as well. We went to the moon and we were most likely assisted by ET. What they saw there was thriving bases and it was wiped from their minds. If the moon mission had to stage for TV it was because they could not show parts of the feed to the public.

We have the technology to pass through the Van Allen Belt now maybe not then that is why I think we were assisted by ET as a show of power to the world part of the NWO plan. Make the US the most formidable force on the world to control the development of the world through the cunning hands of London and the Vatican.

[peace]

yes, the last 10 minutes really showed an agenda. too bad. making a hard point and doing it while calm is much more effective. I found the video interesting, but narrow sighted.

[KiwiElf]

yes, the last 10 minutes really showed an agenda. too bad. making a hard point and doing it while calm is much more effective. I found the video interesting, but narrow sighted.

I agree peace - his research is poor and very narrow. (interesting video tho - there have been more recent - & compelling & professional - versions done since). Attacking and tricking Mitchell & Aldrin like that - he deserved to be smacked.

I do think we went to the Moon but as Werner von Braun himself admitted on more than one occasion, "We had help from "them" - the little guys" .

I would agree that there is something indisputably fishy about the actual landing and terrain exploration - these bits - not the whole thing - were rumoured to be faked and "recreated" at Area 51. There is quite a bit of evidence "out there" that Kubrick was consulted in this. Search through some of the other current Moon discussions/videos etc here on Avalon.

10432

10433

10434


The "alternative theory" suggests that we [I]did go to the Moon under JFK's wishes to get there before 1970 (ie because JFK and the scientific establishment "knew" what was up there, ie an ET presence). Even amateur astronomers had noticed structures and lights moving on the moon decades before and this is well documented.

When we got there [to the Moon], the astronauts allegedly documented wrecked and still occupied alien bases, found in abundance, literally filling the background of most of the photographs taken.

Richard C Hoagland largely bought this to our attention in his ongoing studies of Moon/Mars artifacts since the late 90's with other researchers adding compelling evidence since. This can be seen in several smudged photos. Apparently we were "ordered off the moon".

Reverse engineered Alien technology was allegedly used in the Moon lander propulsion system and shielding (hence the reason no rocket exhaust or scorched ground can be seen under the Lander, and advanced shielding was used to protect the astronauts from the radioactivity". According to one astronaut, "they [UFOs} were up there waiting for us").

Parts of the Moon landing were then refilmed at Area 51 in Nevada as the "public could not be shown the truth". (The crater field can be seen in Google Earth). The real photos with the "artifacts" were later airbrushed out before being made available to the public.

Apollo 17, the last "official" mission, was allegedly ordered to engage in intensive photography of the far side of the Moon, notably the King Crater, where a manned alien base, which still remains, was one of their main "targets".

According to this "Legend", there were possibly three other Apollo missions after #17, also covert military-controlled - not "public missions," and manned alien bases are allegedly still occupied on the Moon.

Apparently Earth has several bases of its own on the Moon, mostly in the Sea of Tranquility, (near the Apollo 11 site) & on Mars. "Ours" have apparently been there for decades whereas the ET bases are considered thousands of years older if not more.