Autism and vaccines

[Sloppyjoe]

I haven't looked into the link between Autism and vaccines much so I was wondering if any of you could give me your opinions on it? I think it is extremely odd that autism has gone up so much since the 70's. What could possibly be making this happen if it wasn't vaccines? Chemtrails? I doubt our DNA has made a sudden change.

http://www.tacanow.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/autism-statistics-2009.jpg

[seko]

It must be the food we eat. Pesticides, chemicals. The water that we drink. I guess it's a very long list. Jim Humble is treating children with Autism and it has seen positive results treating it with MMS. Interesting to see that Autism could be related to the food that we eat.

Lots to learn still. Good thread.

[nearing]

If there was no link, I don't think we would have a special "Vaccine Court". And they wouldn't be paying 'hush' money to families of autistic children.

[modwiz]

I guess this is a path some still have to walk to see the very obvious 'scenery'. The pressure to conform is very suspicious from the jabbers. Perhaps it is nothing more than profit motive that drives them to insist everyone must be vaxed. However, the intellectual dishonesty of claiming other people will get sick if you do not vax is a desperate one. Obviously, if they work, no one who was vaxed would be at any risk now, would they?

Good luck with your research. It is not a black and white issue. I do not contract a rash on contact/exposure to poison ivy. Does that mean that it is not a toxic plant?

This is a very deep subject with paths not immediately visible. Many do not wish to travel them either.

[Sloppyjoe]

You guys made some good points. As far as food goes, the consumption of processed foods wasn't nearly as high as it was in the 70's and earlier related to today. I think that it's a definite possibility that chemicals put in these foods are making people sick in many different ways. It really doesn't take much effort to notice the general health of the people who surround us. I see more overweight people than skinny, I see more processed fast food consumption than healthy food. I have also gotten the feeling that vaccines are and have been being pushed. It is common knowledge to parents for some reason that they have to vaccinate their children, why? Probably because they are SCARED of the possibility of their child developing a disease, they are scared because they have been exposed to the "statistics" of "medical professionals" saying that you must take vaccines. I personally think that people like Wakefield are given a bad rep not because of his supposed "misinformation" but because there are tons of health industry people paid off to expose him as a nut. This quote made me think of the whole thing...

Truth passes through three phases:

* First it is ridiculed.
* Second it is fiercely and violently opposed.
* Third, it becomes self-evident.

— Arthur Schopenhauer

[vibrations]

I stumbled on a researchers of the Autism not long ago, maybe 7 or 8 years back, a group of individuals, medical doctors involved with homeopathy started to treat children in the early stages of autism from the premise that Triple Viral vaccine (named like this in some European countries) was the primal cause. In many cases they were able to revert the process with brain detox only with homeopathy. From then on, the info just started to rain from all over. So, today I have no doubt about the connection.One of my friends has a son affected with severe autism, and analyzing all that happened and how the autism appeared, we are certain that there is a connection.

The other side of the picture is a spiritual path chosen by the entity who experiment life of the autist. As I know this is a voluntary experience normally chosen by very evolved spirits with a goal to teach and learn love and tolerance in a family they are born in.

[onawah]

Just google "Dr. Mercola, vaccines and autism", "Natural News, vaccines and autism", "National Vaccine Information Center, vaccines and autism" and you will find a wealth of articles full of information on this subject, as well as videos.

Dr. Rebecca Carley's site
http://drcarley.com/
is a great resource. She is a court recognized authority on vaccines whose own son became autistic due to vaccines, but she was able to return him to health by developing a homeopathic protocol that she is now teaching. She has been slandered and ridiculed in every way you can think of, but she is a fighter.

Here are some good videos:

zrIM2hwrLoc

cquktgnfbQQ

oIsFW5phHas

[karelia]

I think the first vaccine was developed with honourable intentions. Only, it didn't quite turn out the way it was supposed to, and the BiP (Bastards in Power) jumped on the chance and developed it further as a depopulation tool.

Okay, I'm talking purely from memory here, but everything is easily found by googling: Autism didn't appear until the 1930; by this time, the smallpox vaccine as well as the diphtheria vaccines were widely used in the US. England, on the other hand, used it far less, and autism appeared far less in those years.

As the amount of vaccines ("compulsory" because officials lied; there had been exemptions widely available, but hardly known) grew, autism grew. And today, we've reached 1 autism in 91 humans in the US. In the UK it's lower, on the European Continent, it's even lower, though as far as I'm concerned, any case of autism is way too high for "the greater good," as the BiP so like to point out. The insert of any vaccine tells you the likelihood of experiencing an adverse reaction. If encephalitis or death or diabetes or or or are considered "very rare," I consider it too high. But that's personal. I had measles as a child, I had mumps, I had chicken pox, heck I had hepatitis A, which at the time (in 1979) meant a hospital stay in the isolation ward and fat-free food, but no "treatment" at all, and I survived them all. I must be superwoman according to today's paediatrics, one of whom told me in all seriousness 13 years ago when my son was 2 months that diphtheria is rampant in London/UK. All I could do was laugh at him. I mean, I'd spent about 16 years in London, and I had never come across a case of diphtheria!

Food, or rather what counts as food, is a different subject altogether, yet probably fits in quite well with the vaccine issue, but I don't know about genetics to answer it. My conclusion is that some ingredients in "food" complement the devastation vaccines do, and it's all part of the depopulation agenda with the added side effect of making huge profits. It is telling that many autistic children are absolutely addicted to milk and dairy products as well as white-flour products, but the moment you start feeding them raw milk, which is forbidden/illegal in many states and countries, their addiction goes down rapidly, and the moment you feed them spelt products instead of white flour, they eat less of the stuff without complaining. So there has to be a connection.

As to the 'vaccine court'... The VAERS I think it's called wasn't established until the 1980s. Several people I very highly respect, amongst them Hilary Butler (google her; it's worth it), were opposing the establishment of such an institution, and for good reason. What is this institution doing today? Pretty much nothing. It awards a few dollars every now and then to a vaccine-damaged child/person, and in the meantime, hundreds of thousands vaccine damages go entirely unnoticed, partly because nobody knows about the system, and partly because people have no hope of receiving "justice," as if you can ever have justice when your child is maimed by a medication (which a vaccine is).

Just my one cent.

[Sloppyjoe]

Thanks for the input guys, sadly I think the purpose of all these medications and vaccines are to keep people sick, for big PHARMA to keep making tons of money. Swine flu scare, people are in fear of death and take the vaccines and feel safe. It's the same thing with any other situation. Gov't creates propaganda to put people in fear, and those people submit to any kind of solution so they will be protected. I'm not scared, I know that eating healthy and exercising often is the only medicine I need.

[onawah]

As to the first vaccines, see the video interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the original developers of vaccines, along with Jonas Salk, a proven criminal. Don't be deceived because you just hear Hilleman's voice and see his photo, but don't see him actually saying the words you are hearing. That original video was on youtube, but this one took its place, no doubt because the original was so very incriminating. People can make the argument that it's not really Hilleman saying those works, but I saw the original video, and I can assure you it was.

13QiSV_lrDQ

and see this article entitled "Dr. Jonas Salk, inventor of polio vaccine, exposed as criminal-minded scientist who conducted illicit medical experiments on mental patients"

http://www.naturalnews.com/031564_Jonas_Salk_medical_experiments.html
"(NaturalNews) Dr. Jonas Salk, one of the "gods" in the cult of pharmacology -- a man who is credited with inventing the polio vaccine -- has now been exposed as a medical criminal who conducted illegal medical experiments on mental patients. This fact has come to light courtesy of the Associated Press, believe it or not, which has been investigating the history of medical experiments as part of a press effort leading up to scheduled bioethics meetings in Washington.

According to the Associated Press, Dr. Jonas Salk co-authored a clinical trial that "injected experimental flu vaccine in male patients at a state insane asylum in Ypsilanti, Mich., then exposed them to flu several months later." The victims of this medical experiment were described as "senile and debilitated," meaning that obtaining their rational consent to participate in such experiments would have been impossible. And that means Dr. Jonas Salk -- one of the most highly-worshipped figures throughout modern medicine -- was conducting this trial in violation of medical ethics and in violation of the law.

Isn't it interesting how the vaccine industry and its medical journal propaganda mouthpieces always hurl accusations at people like Dr. Andrew Wakefield, claiming he violated medical ethics for taking blood samples with consent, but when one of their own heroes gets caught engaging in criminal medical experiments involving the injection of insane mental patients without consent, they have nothing to say about it?

In the pro-vaccine cult of pharmacology, any researcher who concludes that vaccines are good for you is considered "right" no matter what laws they violate, what victims they kill or what kind of evils they have to commit in order to achieve their fabricated results. The vaccine industry, as we see throughout history, has openly allowed criminal scientists to operate its clinical trials -- even when human victims were maimed or killed in the process. (And not much has changed since, it seems...)

The Big Lie about the polio vaccine
This trial involving Dr. Jonas Salk was, not surprisingly, federally funded. And it's just the beginning of the lies and deceptions about Dr Jonas Salk and the polio vaccine. For starters, the polio vaccine was a failure and didn't eradicate polio at all, but we'll save that discussion for another story. Today's topic is illegal medical experiments conducted by mad scientists working for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industries.

And on that topic, the true history of the criminal medical experiments that have been done in order to boost the profits of Big Pharma will absolutely shock you. As the AP reports:

"The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations. By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs."

This is the result of Big Pharma leaning on state authorities, of course. Where profits are to be made, human rights have never gotten in the way. In fact, as the historical record clearly shows, the U.S. government has repeatedly conspired with the drug industry to use innocent human beings as unwitting guinea pigs in dangerous, deadly medical experiments.

The history of vaccines, you see, is a history filled with criminal misconduct on the part of medical researchers such as Dr. Jonas Salk (and many others). These were not heroes of science; they were pharma-funded criminal minds who routinely violated the foundations of medical ethics in order to trick prisoners, mental patients and the elderly into serving as their medical guinea pigs.

The criminal history of vaccines
Vaccines are founded on a history of deception and criminality, and now even the Associated Press has realized it, too.

AP reports that in 1963, for example, "Researchers injected cancer cells into 19 old and debilitated patients at a Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in the New York borough of Brooklyn to see if their bodies would reject them." This was a pharma-funded experiment, of course, conducted by yet another criminal-minded researcher claiming to be carrying out "science."

That's the other angle in all this, of course: All these criminal, inhumane medical experiments were carried out in the name of "science." Whether they were infecting blacks, injecting prisoners, or hiring prostitutes to spread sexually-transmitted disease (another true experiment funded in part by the NIH), all these criminal activities were carried out under the label of "science."

The AP goes on to report:

"In widely covered congressional hearings in 1973, pharmaceutical industry officials acknowledged they were using prisoners for testing because they were cheaper than chimpanzees."

Yes! Cheaper than chimpanzees! Gotta love Big Pharma for their cost-saving efforts, eh? This is yet another example of the mindset of Big Pharma and "scientific" researchers who put humans lower than animals on the value scale.

Now Big Pharma is conducting medical experiments on victims in developing nations
Several of the worst medical experiments yet known are described in great detail by the AP report, including this one:

"Holmesburg Prison in Philadelphia made extensive use of inmates for medical experiments. Some of the victims are still around to talk about it. Edward 'Yusef' Anthony, featured in a book about the studies, says he agreed to have a layer of skin peeled off his back, which was coated with searing chemicals to test a drug. He did that for money to buy cigarettes in prison."

"I said 'Oh my God, my back is on fire! Take this ... off me!'" Anthony said in an interview with The Associated Press, as he recalled the beginning of weeks of intense itching and agonizing pain. (http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/27/h...)

Of course, as many of these gross criminal activities came to light, the U.S. government was finally forced to put a stop to it due to public outcry. So the drug companies simply moved their criminal operations offshore where they now engage in routine medical experimentation on children in developing nations, usually by paying off top government officials in those countries to look the other way while their scientists and researchers unleash "pharma crimes" upon the people there.

This is how the experiments in Guatemala came about (http://www.naturalnews.com/029924_m...).

The long but true history of Big Pharma's medical experiments in the name of "science"
NaturalNews, of course, began reporting on these medical experiments in 2006 when we featured a timeline of human medical experimentation in the United States (http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html).

Here's part two of that timeline: http://www.naturalnews.com/019187.html

In the last five years, the mainstream media was all but silent on this issue, failing to report much of anything on the pharma / government medical experimentation conspiracy until the Guatemala experiments were thrust onto the national spotlight in 2010. At that time, most people who learned about the criminal medical experiments carried out by the NIH and funded by the U.S. government were absolutely shocked... even stunned by the idea that this could have been done by the pharmaceutical industry or their own government.

And yet the Guatemala incident barely scratches the surface of what has really gone on behind the scenes, under the name of "science" and through the "conspiracy of profit" that has been operated by Big Pharma and the U.S. government for generations.

Dr. Jonas Salk was part of that criminal conspiracy, of course. Not only is he now implicated in these criminal medical experiments, but as you will see here on NaturalNews in upcoming articles, the credit given to Dr. Salk for ending polio is based on a fraudulent misrepresentation of the historical data -- something that was intentionally done by the vaccine industry in order to convince people that vaccines ended polio!

The truth is far different. The "success" of the polio vaccine has been a 60-year lie. A the "heroic" stature of Dr. Jonas Salk has been a 70-year lie. This man was a Big Pharma criminal. And the truth about him -- and his deadly vaccines -- is finally coming out.

Watch for more reporting here on NaturalNews that exposes the 60-year lie about the polio vaccine and the supposed "heroes of medicine" who were actually criminal-minded scientists working for the drug companies and exploiting human lives to test their deadly chemicals and vaccines.

The truth about the history of Big Pharma and vaccines is finally coming out, folks. And they can't claim it's just a bunch of "conspiracy theories" anymore: This information is now being published in the mainstream media. And there's a lot more to come.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/27/h...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110302...

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031564_Jonas_Salk_medical_experiments.html#ixzz1aXwowYM8"



I think the first vaccine was developed with honourable intentions. Only, it didn't quite turn out the way it was supposed to, and the PiB jumped on the chance and developed it further as a depopulation tool.

Okay, I'm talking purely from memory here, but everything is easily found by googling: Autism didn't appear until the 1930; by this time, the smallpox vaccine as well as the diphtheria vaccines were widely used in the US. England, on the other hand, used it far less, and autism appeared far less in those years.

As the amount of vaccines ("compulsory" because officials lied; there had been exemptions widely available, but hardly known) grew, autism grew. And today, we've reached 1 autism in 91 humans in the US. In the UK it's lower, on the European Continent, it's even lower, though as far as I'm concerned, any case of autism is way too high for "the greater good," as the BiP so like to point out. The insert of any vaccine tells you the likelihood of experiencing an adverse reaction. If encephalitis or death or diabetes or or or are considered "very rare," I consider it too high. But that's personal. I had measles as a child, I had mumps, I had chicken pox, heck I had hepatitis A, which at the time (in 1979) meant a hospital stay in the isolation ward and fat-free food, but no "treatment" at all, and I survived them all. I must be superwoman according to today's paediatrics, one of whom told me in all seriousness 13 years ago when my son was 2 months that diphtheria is rampant in London/UK. All I could do was laugh at him. I mean, I'd spent about 16 years in London, and I had never come across a case of diphtheria!

Food, or rather what counts as food, is a different subject altogether, yet probably fits in quite well with the vaccine issue, but I don't know about genetics to answer it. My conclusion is that some ingredients in "food" complement the devastation vaccines do, and it's all part of the depopulation agenda with the added side effect of making huge profits. It is telling that many autistic children are absolutely addicted to milk and dairy products as well as white-flour products, but the moment you start feeding them raw milk, which is forbidden/illegal in many states and countries, their addiction goes down rapidly, and the moment you feed them spelt products instead of white flour, they eat less of the stuff without complaining. So there has to be a connection.

As to the 'vaccine court'... The VAERS I think it's called wasn't established until the 1980s. Several people I very highly respect, amongst them Hilary Butler (google her; it's worth it), were opposing the establishment of such an institution, and for good reason. What is this institution doing today? Pretty much nothing. It awards a few dollars every now and then to a vaccine-damaged child/person, and in the meantime, hundreds of thousands vaccine damages go entirely unnoticed, partly because nobody knows about the system, and partly because people have no hope of receiving "justice," as if you can ever have justice when your child is maimed by a medication (which a vaccine is).

Just my one cent.

[karelia]

As to the first vaccines, see the video interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the original developers of vaccines, along with Jonas Salk, a proven criminal.

When I referred to the first vaccines, I meant Jenner et al, not the 20th century ones. From there on, it all went downhill, no doubt. (Just to clarify)

[onawah]

Even though I have done lots of research on vaccines and so know them to be part of TPTW's eugenics population control plan, and have personally been injured by them, I still keep in mind and believe what this channeled message tells us.
From:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32259-October-10-2011-Message-from-Matthew

"Now then, we shall address some of the other issues in your thoughts. First, we urge you to stop worrying about the long-term effects of radioactivity from damaged nuclear reactors in Japan, genetically engineered foods, vaccines, and toxins in various forms of pollution. The cells of all persons who absorb the light are being changed to the crystalline form that will “shed” everything with low vibrations that inhibit the ability to function healthfully in body, mind and spirit."

[vortex surfer]

Okay, I'm talking purely from memory here, but everything is easily found by googling: Autism didn't appear until the 1930; by this time, the smallpox vaccine as well as the diphtheria vaccines were widely used in the US. England, on the other hand, used it far less, and autism appeared far less in those years.

I find this interesting. As for autism and other consequences of vaccines, like increase in narcolepsy (cronic sleep disorder), I'm open to vaccines playing a part. I'm highly sceptical of giving vaccines to young children or infants without a fully developed immune system, or giving people vaccines like it's a cure and withouth proper testing. That being said, I think there's more to blame than just vaccines.. which has been mentioned here by others. And vaccines have done some good.

One thing that has got me thinking when it comes to "newer" disorders, like autism, is wheter it didn't appear until the 1930s because of those vaccines - or - because there simply wasn't a diagnosis for it. For example the rate of a lot of disorders and diseases in the western world seems much higher than in other places - which may be true - but then again there isn't the same system and resources in for example africa or parts of asia where you could get a proper diagnosis.

[Calz]

(NaturalNews) The nation of Finland has now openly admitted that the swine flu vaccine "conclusively" causes narcolepsy, a chronic nervous system disorder that makes people uncontrollably fall asleep. The Finnish government, in acknowledging this link, says it will pay for "lifetime medical care" for 79 children who have been irreparably damaged by the swine flu vaccine. (http://news.yahoo.com/finland-vows-...)

Narcolepsy isn't the only side effect now admitted to be caused by swine flu vaccines: 76 of the 79 children also suffered hallucinations and "paralyzing physical collapses," say Finnish researchers.

Remarkably, even though the link between swine flu vaccines and permanent neurological damage in children is now openly admitted by the Finnish government, there is absolutely no talk about halting the utterly unscientific ritual of injecting children with flu vaccines in the first place. Not only are flu vaccines harmful to children (as is now admitted), but flu vaccines don't even work! A simple daily dose of vitamin D would do far more to halt influenza than any vaccine (http://www.naturalnews.com/029760_v...).


U.S. refuses to admit vaccines harm anyone

The U.S. government, of course, still refuses to admit vaccines cause any harm whatsoever. Both the government and the vaccine industry continue to push the fabricated fairy tale that "vaccines are safe and effective," meaning they harm no one but help everyone. Yet the truth is practically the polar opposite: Vaccines harm countless millions of children each year in ways that are usually never linked to vaccines (mild mental retardation, suppressed immune function, learning disabilities, etc.). At the same time, vaccines are all but worthless at preventing infections. Even the vaccine industry's own research shows that flu shots only work on 1 out of 100 people, meaning they're completely useless for 99 percent of those who take them (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_v...).

Instead of admitting the truth that vaccines cause autism, the U.S. government has conspired with vaccine manufacturers to create a Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which essentially pays "hush money" to parents of permanently harmed children to make sure they cannot bring their claims of harm to federal courts (http://www.naturalnews.com/033635_v...).

Even worse, the medical establishment -- which is heavily influenced if not downright dominated by pharmaceutical interests -- absolutely refuses to advocate vitamin D as a flu prevention nutrient. Vitamin D is safe, effective and affordable. It's available without a prescription and could save literally billions of dollars in national health care costs for just pennies per day per person. So why won't the medical establishment promote vitamin D? Precisely because it would cost the industry billions of dollars in lost profits from all the sickness and degenerative disease that is prevented by vitamin D.


Of course vaccines cause autism!

There is absolutely no question in the mind of any reasonably informed person that vaccines cause neurological damage, including (but not limited to) autism. Only the corporate-whore scientists around the world continue their charade that vaccines are not linked to autism; or that vaccines even work in the first place. Most Americans haven't yet heard the secret interview with Merck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman where he openly admits vaccines carry dozens of strains of cancer-causing "stealth" viruses. Read the transcript here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_D...

Listen to the interview at:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAA...

Similarly, most people still don't know that Dr. Jonas Salk, the celebrated "grandfather" of vaccines who is credited with creating the polio vaccine, was an unindicted medical criminal who committed heinous crimes against humanity in the name of "medical science." (http://www.naturalnews.com/031564_J...)

In fact, the whole history of vaccines and medicine has been utterly distorted by the medical establishment to paint vaccines in a glorified light of public health. But the real story is that vaccines are now -- and have always been -- tools for causing disease and promoting sickness so that the pharmaceutical industry can benefit as a result.


The horrifying truth about the vaccine industry and medical establishment

Remember, this is the same industry that got caught conducting outrageous medical experiments on Guatemalan prisoners (http://www.naturalnews.com/033483_G...). These are the same people who ran Tuskegee experiments on African Americans, too (http://www.naturalnews.com/029924_m...).

Do you honestly think these same vaccine criminals would not also use innocent children for their own mass inoculation medical experiments? Remember: These are hard-core, Nazi-style criminals we're talking about here. This is who runs the pharmaceutical industry. The former chairperson of Bayer, for example, was a convicted Nazi war criminal who was indicted and sentenced at the Nuremburg trials:

Don't believe me? Read your history:

"Dr. Fritz ter Meer, a director of IG Farben who was directly involved in developing the nerve gas, Zyklon-B, which killed millions of Jews, was sentenced to seven years in prison but was released after four years through the intervention of Rockefeller and J.J. McCloy, then U.S. High Commissioner for Germany. An unrepentant Fritz ter Meer, guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity, returned to work in Bayer where he served as Chairman for more than 10 years, until 1961. This same ter Meer, a convicted Nazi war criminal, went on to become one of the initiators of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 1962, an organization that was nurtured by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and latterly the World Trade Organization (WTO)." (http://www.naturalnews.com/024534_E...)


Governments know vaccines maim and kill children -- that's exactly why they push them so aggressively

You see, every world government already knows that vaccines are murder. They know vaccines kill and maim children. They know vaccines cause autism and neurological disorders. They know this and then they keep promoting vaccines anyway. Why? Because they are mass murderers who have philosophical roots in Nazi Germany and the eugenics movement. Even today's FDA can be traced backed to eugenics and population control. Bill Gates, who promotes world vaccination, openly admits that vaccines and health care can "reduce world population by 10 to 15 percent" if they "do a good job." (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_v...)

Don't believe me? Watch Bill Gates say it himself in this video:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A...

Vaccines are not given to children with the "accident" that they kill some children and cause neurological disorders in others; no, they are given to children BECAUSE they cause neurological disorders, organ failure, infertility, reduced intelligence and numerous other side effects.

Today's vaccines create tomorrow's health care customers, you see.

Vaccines keep Big Pharma in business based on repeat profits
How else is Big Pharma supposed to ensure its future profits if the population were actually allowed to stay healthy? The whole point of vaccines is to DAMAGE HUMAN HEALTH and rake in trillions of dollars in long-term profits from all the suffering and disease caused by those vaccines.

C'mon, folks: Do you really think all these for-profit companies are trying to HELP humanity? Do you really think drug company CEOs are goody-goody humanitarians who would give up their shareholder profits and drive their own companies out of business by promoting lasting health?

Wake up, people. Wake up and smell the coffee. Drug companies think absolutely nothing of murdering Nigerian children (http://www.naturalnews.com/023654.html) or even using your own children as medical experiments as long as they make more money in the process. And as the editor of NaturalNews, having seen countless documents, tips, testimonials and other sources of information that have been given to me over the years, I can tell you with absolute certainty that the pharmaceutical industry is actively using vaccines to CAUSE degenerative disease as a way to lock in future profits from that disease.


Vaccines are a business continuity strategy used by the for-profit pharmaceutical industry

It's just like a greasy car mechanic throwing some solvents into your gas tank so that you have to come back for engine repairs after a few hundred miles. The drug companies are willing to do anything to guarantee their profits, and that includes committing acts of genocide against the human race as long as it fattens their bottom line profits.

We are not dealing with ethical, principled human beings in the pharmaceutical industry, folks. We are dealing with criminal-minded monsters who have found a way to selfishly enrich themselves at the expense and suffering of others.

And they relish in it. They get off on watching children suffer and die from their vaccines. They get a rise out of the fact that they are pulling off this scam with such success that the sheeple of the world will actually line up at their local pharmacies and beg to be injected with the very chemical adjuvants and live viral materials that will destroy their health and turn them into lifetime medical victims.

The sick, demented medical elite who engineer all this (which includes top people at the FDA, by the way), are like modern-day vampires who suck the life out of innocent little children in order to feed their own devilish appetites for wealth and power. And watching it all happen every day in America, Finland, and everywhere else around the world is absolutely infuriating. That's why I work so hard to expose these medical quacks for the true criminals they really are. These people who lead Big Pharma and the vaccine industry would infect your baby with cancer if it guaranteed them chemotherapy profits two decades down the road.

These people should be arrested, thrown in prison and charged with their role in these crimes against humanity. Occupy Wall Street is just one movement that's rising up in opposition to the total scam of the fraudulent banking industry and the Federal Reserve, but we need another movement: Occupy Big Pharma where the sick, degenerate masses who have been harmed by all these vaccines and deadly pharmaceuticals march on the drug companies and arrest their CEOs for crimes against humanity.

I know that day is coming. There will be a day when the angry, diseased masses figure out the depth of the medical crimes that have been committed against them in the name of "public health..." and they will rage against the machine.

To all the vaccine company CEOs out there: Enjoy your millions right now, because there will come a day when you have to answer for how you got that money and who really had to pay the price for your financial windfall. Hundreds of millions of children are harmed today around the world because of vaccines, and that number will continue to rise with each passing year that we allow humanity to be chemically assaulted by these biological weapons known as "vaccines."

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/033816_swine_flu_vaccines_neurological_disorders.html#ixzz1aZqqdiTX

[Houman]

The vaccination story is a sad one and far from being new... you may want to check the date on the book at the following link
http://www.drcarley.com/Horrors_of_Vaccination_Exposed.pdf

http://www.drcarley.com/Horrors_of_Vaccination_Exposed.pdf


I recommend watching the following presentation by Dr Andrew Moulden to have some insight on how mass vaccination has affected everyone (and not just people who got a "visible" adverse reaction)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3296758102537633637

[Calz]

Why do we even need to post stuff like this any more??? Moot point me thinks.

IHqVDMr9ivo

[onawah]

I'm not so sure that "vaccines have done some good".
I'm more inclined to go with Dr. Rebecca Carley, an expert on both vaccines and homeopathy, who has concluded that the "science" behind vaccines was completely wrong at the very beginning.
The idea of injecting anything directly into the body, bypassing the immune system altogether, makes no sense to me.
The immune system was designed to protect us from foreign agents.
Science gets into trouble when it thinks it can improve on Nature.
If you read "authorized" versions of history, then it will appear that "vaccines have done some good", but from the perspective of someone who is taking a fresh, unbiased look, it doesn't look that way at all, but instead, appears that general health improved due to improved diet, sanitation, hygiene and other such factors.


[QUOTE]. And vaccines have done some good..

[onawah]

Lots more videos on Dr. Moulden's work here:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Vaccine+Health+Truth+Tolerance+Lost+by+Dr.+Andrew+Moulden+Part+1+of+3+&aq=f
A great interview with him here:
http://peopleforfreedom.com/new-world-order-news/vaccine-dangers/dr-andrew-moulden-interview-what-you-were-never-told-about-vaccines/

"Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines

An Interview with Dr. Andrew Moulden
Vactruth.com

1.) Dr. Moulden, can you tell us a bit about your background?

I am 44 years of age and have spent my entire adult life in academia, university, and clinical health science studies, practice, and research. My affinity for the brain and behavioral sciences stemmed from a genuine desire to find answers to many unanswered questions, questions such as – Why are we here? What makes us human? and What causes illnesses like schizophrenia, dementia, multiple sclerosis, learning disabilities, and many other often debilitating illnesses.

My area of expertise is in neurobehavioral assessment of brain and behavioral disorders – www.BrainGuardMD.com

My Bachelor’s degree was in Biological Psychology. I graduated valedictorian with an 88% cumulative average from Nipissing University, North Bay Ontario, Canada, in my core area of specialty. My Masters degree was in Child Development with my main thesis in language and neurocognitive development in children and adolescents (Laurentian University). My Undergraduate course grades in Brain and Behavior (98%) and Neurobiology (94%) were straight “A’s”. I achieved a similar level of academic success during the Masters and PhD degrees.

My PhD was in Clinical-Experimental Neuropsychology. I completed a sub-specialization in Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Ottawa during the PhD degree. My PhD comprehensive exams were on Acquired Brain Injuries and Post Concussion Syndrome. I worked with the Mild Brain Injury Association as a group leader and also the Head Injury Association of Toronto, during the PhD training. My PhD comprehensive exam was on acquired Brain Injuries. My clinical work was devoted to detecting acquired brain injuries.

I was a Natural, Sciences, Engineering, and Research Council of Canada scholar, an Ontario Mental Health Foundation scholar, an Ontario Graduate scholar, and received 27 Awards/scholarships for academic, research, clinical, and teaching excellence during my University training. I was ranked in the top 1-5% of medical residents during my emergency medicine residency rotations in Ottawa.

I have taught enrichment courses on Brain and Behavior, Neurology, Neuropsychology, and Neuropsychiatry at the University of Ottawa (1993-2005) and full courses in Neurbobiology at Atlantic Baptist University in Moncton, Newbrunswick Canada.

My clinical training during the PhD was in Clinical Neuropsychology at the Baycrest Hospital, Rotman Research Institute – University of Toronto, and the Credit Valley Hospital, Ottawa Health Sciences Center memory Disorders Clinic. The PhD thesis was in Functional Brain Imaging and Neuro-Electrophysiology at the Univiversity of Toronto. I subsequently completed a medical degree at the McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.

During the PhD my extra-curricular training was in Behavioral Neurology and Clinical Neuropsychology. My clerkship electives training during medical school was in Clinical Neurology. My residency training was in Psychiatry/Neuropsychiatry. I received the licentiate of the Medical Counsel of Canada (2006) having passed the core knowledge (LMCC 1) and clinical skills (LMCC 2) exams consistent with the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE parts 1 and 2).

During my clinical residency training I was ranked in the top 1-5% of medical residents during rotations by my supervisors including my emergency medicine rotations in Ottawa.

I have elected to devote myself to neurobehavioral and neurocognitive assessments and research based upon my PhD and Masters training rather than practicing clinical medicine. I pursued a Medical degree solely to further understand brain and behavioral disorders, from a clinical medicine frame of reference, rather than pursuing a goal to become a practicing/prescribing physician.

For the past several years I have devoted myself to deciphering the neurobehavioral sequel associated with immune system hyper stimulation, neurodevelopmental disorders, and ultimately to vaccinations as the common environmental trigger for several brain and behavioral disorders I have studied since the undergraduate degree.

My work will be submitted for peer review in the upcoming several months. For now, peer review is available in the Tolerance Lost DVD series as I have translated the medical sciences into an information and presentation style that can be understood by the public at large, as well as the vaccine injury court special masters. Examples of the evidence of harm, I have cataloged in a ’see for yourself’ format.

2.) Dr. Moulden, we understand that you have made a revolutionary discovery. Can you tell us about it?

I would be happy to.

Through my extensive research and my work throughout the years, I have discovered that vaccinations are causing impaired blood flow (ischemia) to brain and body from clinically silent to death. These are strokes – across the board for all of us. I have reason to believe that all are being affected and all vaccinations ARE causing the overwhelming rise in autism, specific learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, sudden infant death, gulf war syndrome, dementia, seizure disorders, some cancers it would appear, and much much more.

3.) What led you away from the rigid and possibly blinkered views of most of the rest of the medical profession?

The brain and nervous system is wired in a very specific format. Functions are localized to specific areas. Having studied brain and behavior, neurosciences, clinical neuropsychology, child neurodevelopment, functional brain imaging, clinical neurology, clinical neuropsychiatry, clinical medicine, immunology, hematology, tests and measurement, and understanding the tools and assumptions and techniques of mainstream medicine, I fell in the unique position of having being able to see clinical medicine problems, from a multitude of simultaneous areas of expertise and scientific knowledge. Relative to the human brain, I understood “rules and laws” of brain function relative to brain damage and the mechanisms of medical physiology that can uniquely cause unique patterns of brain damage in ways that my clinical skills could detect, that mainstream neuroimaging cannot. The initial “aha” moment was in 2001.

4.) What was it which caught your attention, what tipped you off and incited you to scratch the surface and investigate further?

I was seeing, autistic patients, coming out of medical school – they had a trans-cortical motor aphasia, isolation of speech syndrome, and very specific cranial nerve palsies that could ONLY be accounted for by ischemic stroke. Remarkably, my studies of schizophrenia, dementia, and research exposure to neuroimaging modalities and brain and behavioral assessments before medical school contributed to my ability to “see” what has been in front of our eyes all along – ischemic strokes and brain damages – from vaccinations. The problem has been we neither knew how to measure, when to measure or what to measure, let alone what the limitations were, of the tools we have been using to measure brain integrity, in health, disease and disorder.

It has taken the past several years to decipher how ischemic brain damages were happening in the autism we were seeing and the many other neurodevelopmental disorders. I now believe I have the answers for this, or so it appears and some solutions.

Wild polio caused the exact same brain damages as ALL other vaccines are. Indeed, Guillian Barre syndrome and a host of other neurological disorders is being caused by a common mechanism of injury – albeit from different triggers for different individuals. This is ischemia –from impaired blood flow in microcirculation units. We simply did not appreciate what was right before our eyes.

My first cases included several Autistic and Schizophrenic patients. They were showing the exact same acute onset palsies – paralysis. These brain damages were subtle – but measurable multiple, and were present in the pre-vaccine era for wild viruses like polio and infantile paralysis.

Once I was armed with the knowledge and skills of a medical doctor, a clinical neuropsychologist, a child neurodevelopmentalist, with research experience in neuroimaging, tests and measurement, scientific method design and analysis, functional localization of brain and behavioral disorders, and a broad base across several other scientific disciplines, I was able to see “the whole forest” despite the trees. Quite literally, I believe I have found and discovered a common mechanism towards acquired human disease and disorder – all of it. It is truly humbling.

5.) How have you been able to show this and how have you managed to demonstrate this? What medical imaging underlies it all? What medical imaging is the basis for it all?

I have quantified and expanded standard neurological and clinical neuropsychological tools of brain function and assessment. In essence, I have “digitized” the neurological and neuropsychological physical neurological exams across neurodevelopment using contemporary image enhancement software constrained to functional localization in the brain relative to end vascular, watershed territories – “the end of the road” for varied brain blood vessel areas. All of my tools and techniques are non-invasive.

I am now able to assess in the here and now, or looking back 50 years ago, to answer questions as to cause, in disease, neurodevelopment disorders, and much more. Remarkably, we can now advance diagnose sudden infant death syndrome, and I can answer questions relative to – Was this a shaken baby?, Did vaccines cause this person to have autism? Was this death caused by Gardasil? Did vaccines cause these damages? Since the mechanism to damages is common across all, when vaccines are involved – and sometimes even virulent infectious diseases.

6.) What is the basic information underlying your claims and what is the foundation of your beliefs?

Germs simply are not the only root cause of death, disease, and disorder. I have now conclusively shown that ALL vaccines, from infancy to geriatric, are causing the exact same brain damages irrespective of what disease or disorder comes out. The damages are specific to end vascular “mini strokes” that are beneath the resolution of our neuroimaging, but measurable in a before/after vaccination protocol. They are also directly measurable in real time – however, this involves techniques and technology I have not disclosed to the public as yet.

Remarkably, wild polio, pre-natal German measles, measles, tetanus, “Spanish flu”, etc.. all caused the exact same damages in the pre-vaccine era. We simply did not appreciate that a generic response in the human body was causing the paralysis and respiratory failure and more in from a non-specific immune response and instability of microscopic blood flow hemodynamics.

We have weakened viruses and bacteria, injected them into all of us and caused chronic illness and disease in an attenuated form, this is how these pathogens have always caused harm. It is the bodies response to foreign things entering it, especially under hypersensitivity states, that is causing neurodevelopment disorders and chronic illness and much more.

7.) You speak of epidemics. What is your understanding of an epidemic? How does it manifest?

The explanation of epidemic is simple, we are now seeing:

1 in 6 children with specific learning disabilities.
12-15% children with attention deficit disorder.
1 in 87 with autism spectrum – a 1700% increase over ten years.
1% sudden infant death
40 deaths and 15,000 substantive adverse Gardasil reactions
1 in 15 over 65 with dementia; 1 in 8 over 85
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Fibromyalgia
Seizure disorders
“West” syndrome
Global developmental delay
1 in 450 with type 1 diabetes
1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer over a lifetime.
Gulf war syndrome affecting and disabling 250,000 troops and 42,000 deaths. These vaccinated soldiers show the exact same neurological damages after vaccination as the infants and children are exhibiting after each childhood vaccination. These are strokes – oxygen demand exceeding oxygen supply – conclusively!

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

These microscopic strokes are happening to the brain and body in immediate and delayed, waxing and waning, acute and chronic ways. This is receiving a plethora of clinical labels. In basic physiology – the base cause is common across the board.

There is no such thing as an acquired genetic epidemic. The epidemic is an acquired phenomenon, from environmental factors, for which I can now conclusively show, vaccinations are the mass culprit for most of this.

8.) What has the response been to your discoveries? How have they been received by the public / the world at large?

The public gets it. The chiropractors embrace it. The medical Doctors, including pediatric neurologists, are stunned by it. The pharmaceutical and organized medicine cartels – must deny it. The philosophy is “if they cannot deny the message, then they will discredit the messenger.” This is simply how the system works."

That's not even half of the interview. See the rest at:
http://peopleforfreedom.com/new-world-order-news/vaccine-dangers/dr-andrew-moulden-interview-what-you-were-never-told-about-vaccines/

[Sloppyjoe]

Even though I have done lots of research on vaccines and so know them to be part of TPTW's eugenics population control plan, and have personally been injured by them, I still keep in mind and believe what this channeled message tells us.
From:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32259-October-10-2011-Message-from-Matthew

"Now then, we shall address some of the other issues in your thoughts. First, we urge you to stop worrying about the long-term effects of radioactivity from damaged nuclear reactors in Japan, genetically engineered foods, vaccines, and toxins in various forms of pollution. The cells of all persons who absorb the light are being changed to the crystalline form that will “shed” everything with low vibrations that inhibit the ability to function healthfully in body, mind and spirit."

I absolutely agree, thanks for posting that it really shed the light on me.

[karelia]

And vaccines have done some good.


I disagree completely. There is not one shred of scientific evidence that vaccines have ever done any good. If you look at the stats of the various diseases (the original stats, not the brushed-up ones), you will find that each disease had already heavily declined by the time the vaccine was introduced, or, as is the case of TB, the disease grew in occurrence parallel to administering vaccines.

The rate of autism is a lot higher in the US than in other Western countries; the rate of vaccination in the population of the US is also considerably higher compared to other Western countries. In Asia and such, the rate of vaccination is a lot lower than the BiPs would like, but then those third-world countries have a huge problem with in-breeding, which means, as far as the BiPs are concerned, they don't need to "help" the depopulation agenda, since those nations are doing a good job all by themselves.

[onawah]

CDC caught in blatant lies about pandemics and vaccines
http://www.naturalnews.com/033902_CDC_vaccines.html

(NaturalNews) The CDC relies on an authoritative presence to influence not just USA health policy, but world health policy. This prestigious presence also demands more federal funding, which is being questioned. It seems that the CDC's research, practices, and expenditures have been under scrutiny lately.

Although very few know of what has been hidden from public view regarding CDC investigations, there may soon be too much dirt for the White House to cover up completely.

Remembering the 2008 swine flu hoax
Remember all those pandemic forecasts from the CDC when different high numbers of swine flu outbreaks were reported? A CBS News program called "Washington Unplugged" wanted to know more details on how those figures were derived, but the CDC stonewalled that reporter.

To his credit, he went around the CDC by surveying each individual state's health agency, and he discovered that very few swine flu cases reported by the CDC were confirmed as swine flu. Most were actually a normal "seasonal" flu.

The discrepancy between CDC swine flu statistics and actual confirmed cases was too large to considered sloppy record keeping. Upon further pressure from "Washington Unplugged" news producer, the CDC clamped down more and decided they couldn't track swine flu cases anymore because "it was too difficult."

The CDC quit doing what they're supposed to do because they got caught cooking the swine flu stats.

This was a rare case of kudos for the mainstream media. For those paying attention, it flagged the CDC's bogus promotion of swine flu shots for a flu that hardly existed and that many considered less dangerous than a normal seasonal flu.

CDC lies about mercury in vaccines
From investigative reporter Tim Bolen of The Bolen Report's two part article "The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up" (sourced below). As early as 1998 the CDC knew that there were problems with using thimerosal mercury in vaccines.

This was especially true with the ever increasing childhood vaccination schedule. Their own researchers turned in a internal draft stating this. The CDC decided to cover this up by hiring fake studies to explain away those mercury links to the rising autism rates.

The earliest misleading study was the "Danish Study," masterminded for the CDC by Kreesten Madsen, whose partner Paul Thorsen has recently been indicted for fraudulent funding activities. This epidemiological study became the cornerstone for the foundation of lies "proving" thimerosal was not a factor for causing autism or other childhood developmental disabilities.

Bolen adds, "Even the US Congress began to smell the CDC stink and investigated." A congressional committee released a 2003 report called Mercury in Medicine - Taking Unnecessary Risks. The report pdf can be seen here: http://vaccines.procon.org/sourcefi...

Congressman Dan Burton headed the investigation. He had a grandchild who was vaccinated then became autistic, and he was ruthless with vaccine industry and CDC representatives while he presided over hearings. The appropriate findings and excellent suggestions were ignored by the Bush administration and the CDC.

Bolen wondered where anti-vaccination activist Bobby Kennedy, Jr. got a one in six figure for developmentally challenged children. Then he came across a bulletin from the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics issued in 2004 entitled Autism A.L.A.R.M. (source below) which stated that one in six children had developmental/behavioral issues while one in 166 were diagnosed with an autistic disorder.

Tim Bolen estimates that from 1998 to 2011, close to 12 million children worldwide have been afflicted with autism, making the worldwide autism ratio one out of 111 children. The CDC claims they don't understand how this is all happening. They just know it is.

The full title of the CDC is Center for Disease Control and Prevention. They're very heavily funded but clueless about autism and developmental disorders on the rise?

Ten billion and asking for more
In 2007 Senator Tom Coburn issued a report titled CDC Off Center (source below). The report cites huge mismanagement of funds for non-disease related expenses, generous payrolls, overly lavish facilities, and trips wasting funds on frivolous disease control issues while unable to explain how they are preventing disease.

CBS did a special report on Coburn's report, and mentioned that even then (2007) the CDC was asking the US Government for an additional billion dollars to its $10 billion dollar budget. See where the money goes on this TV report here: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/...

David and Goliath
A Ph.D biochemist, Brian Hooker, whose son became autistic after a series of vaccinations, has recently filed a suit against the CDC for violating the Freedom of Information Act by not releasing data he has been requesting since 2005 regarding CDC studies that dismissed mercury vaccine dangers.

According to Bolen, Hooker is going in with top gun lawyers in the Washington, DC loop. He has given the CDC an ultimatum to release the documents he wants by late October 2011. This could be interesting.

Sources for this article include:

Bolen Reports CDC thimerosal cover up part 1 http://www.bolenreport.com/Geier/fo...

Bolen reports CDC thimerosal cover up part 2 http://www.bolenreport.com/Geier/fo...

CBS 2008 CDC Swine flu investigation http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009...

Senator Tom Coburn's CDC Off Center report http://coburn.senate.gov/public/ind...

Autism A.L.A.R.M. http://www.ewg.org/files/AutismAlar...

Articles Related to This Article:
• CDC vaccine scientist who downplayed links to autism indicted by DOJ in alleged fraud scheme

• Flu Vaccines, pharma fraud, quack science, the CDC and WHO -- all exposed by Richard Gale and Gary Null

• CDC warns Americans to prepare for zombie apocalypse (really)

• CDC Laboratories Revealed as Incapable of Accurate Count of H1N1 Influenza Infections, Deaths

• CDC now calling U.S. households and demanding child immunization records as part of vaccine surveillance and tracking program

• Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division (opinion)

[Calz]

New article (received in email) from Dr. Mercola regarding vaccines and autism. Quicky formatting ... best to take link at bottom (includes vid).

__________________________________________________________________


Is Alarming Rise in Autism Linked to 1988 Event?

Posted By Dr. Mercola
November 15 2011

(video here if you take link)


In 1988, the first conjugate vaccine was approved for use in the U.S.

It was intended to protect infants and young children against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib); a bacterial infection that can lead to pneumonia, infections of your blood, joints, bones, and pericardium.

Historically, it has also been a leading cause of bacterial meningitis.

Since that time, the vaccine has been approved in most developed countries, including Denmark and Israel where the vaccine was added to their national vaccine programs in 1993 and 1994, respectively.

Starting in the late 1980's, there was a marked increase in the reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children in the U.S.

A similar increase was seen in Denmark and Israel.

While the rise may be a reflection of "ascertainment biases," researchers now suggest the Hib vaccine may be another trigger. The continuation of the trend toward increased rates of autism spectrum disorders could be further explained by the increased usage of the vaccine.

New Hypothesis: the Hib Vaccine May Explain Rapid Rise in Autism
According to a recent study in the journal Medical Hypotheses:

"It is hypothesized here that the introduction of the Hib conjugate vaccine in the US in 1988 and its subsequent introduction in Denmark and Israel could explain a substantial portion of the initial increases in ASDs in those countries.

The continuation of the trend toward increased rates of ASDs could be further explained by increased usage of the vaccine, a change in 1990 in the recommended age of vaccination in the US from 15 to 2months, increased immunogenicity of the vaccine through changes in its carrier protein, and the subsequent introduction of the conjugate vaccine for Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Although conjugate vaccines have been highly effective in protecting infants and young children from the significant morbidity and mortality caused by Hib and S. pneumoniae, the potential effects of conjugate vaccines on neural development merit close examination.

Conjugate vaccines fundamentally change the manner in which the immune systems of infants and young children function by deviating their immune responses to the targeted carbohydrate antigens from a state of hypo-responsiveness to a robust B2 B cell mediated response.

This period of hypo-responsiveness to carbohydrate antigens coincides with the intense myelination process in infants and young children, and conjugate vaccines may have disrupted evolutionary forces that favored early brain development over the need to protect infants and young children from capsular bacteria."

Why Pinning Autism on a Particular Vaccine May Be Counterproductive…
According to Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), vaccine injury is the result of a unique interaction between the host and the type and numbers of vaccines given to that person.

In other words, vaccine injury and death is induced by a number of co-factors, including:

Age at the time of vaccination Personal or family history of brain and immune system dysfunction (allergies, autoimmunity, seizures, etc.) Health status at the time of vaccination (coinciding acute or chronic illness)
Personal and/or family history of vaccine reactions Types and numbers of vaccines given the day after an initial reaction took place Types and numbers of vaccines given prior to experiencing a vaccine reaction


There is a tendency by researchers investigating vaccine injury and death to want to point to "one" cause as the reason for an individual's vaccine reaction, or population-based chronic disease prevalence. Many different hypotheses have been forwarded by different people regarding the link between vaccines and the dramatic rise in autism over the past few decades.

Harris Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher were the first to point to the whole cell pertussis vaccine, which can cause brain damage labeled as "autism" in some children.
In 1998, Andy Wakefield suggested a link between autism and the live virus measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Mercury (thimerosal) preservatives in inactivated vaccines have been repeatedly implicated by various experts, as has the combination of MMR vaccine and thimerosal in vaccines.
According to Dr. David Ayoub, a radiologist and physician who has become a specialist on the additives and preservatives used in vaccines, aluminum adjuvants may be an even greater factor than thimerosal.
The "sole cause" hypothesis is convenient because it is simple and easy to understand. It is also easier for people to think that action can be taken to "fix" the problem if there is only one cause; i.e., separate the MMR vaccine into single doses; take thimerosal or aluminum out of the vaccines, and so forth.

However, the problem with promoting the "sole cause" hypothesis when it comes to vaccination is that the rise in chronic disease and disability among our children, including autism, is likely caused by a multiple factors in any number of combinations. Therefore, by trying to hone in on just one cause, we're likely to fail in our efforts to curb this epidemic.

Why We Must Broaden Our Scope and Address Multiple Co-Factors
Ultimately, focusing on "one cause" does little more than cause confusion when that theoretical cause turns out to be lacking or incorrect. Furthermore, there's a danger of wholly dismissing one potential cause after the other, as each potential cause fails to be proven absolutely causative. As a result, we may end up doing too little, or nothing, to eliminate the various co-factors that might be working in tandem to, ultimately, produce autism.

In addition to the vaccine-related factors just mentioned, there are numerous other potential co-factors that cannot yet be discounted, including:

Genetically modified foods Fluoride over-exposure Environmental toxins of all kinds
Mercury amalgams Processed, denatured foods Electromagnetic fields and "dirty electricity"
Vitamin D deficiency Gut flora dysbiosis


This is one of the reasons why the NVIC avoids trying to pin any particular vaccine injury on any particular vaccine. Rather the main thrust of their information campaign is to simply question the wisdom of mandating increasing numbers of childhood vaccines in the absence of true knowledge. There are distressing gaps in vaccine safety science that precludes us from understanding the biological high-risk factors that make some individuals more susceptible than others, for example.

The current one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates simply throws too many children under the proverbial bus, because we simply do not know what all these vaccines are doing to individuals with different predispositions, or how different vaccines interact when given in combination.


Majority of Drug Reactions in Kids are Due to Vaccines
While it's highly unlikely that any one vaccine is responsible for the autism epidemic, there are many signs indicating that we may be giving our children too many vaccines, and that vaccines of all kinds may be less innocuous than previously believed.

Case in point: The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) runs a national spontaneous reporting system to collect adverse drug reaction (ADR) data. More than 31,000 ADR reports for children below the age of 17 were received between 2000 and 2009, and vaccines were a factor in more than 66 percent of these pediatric drug reaction reports.

According to a recent review in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology:

"Vaccines were included in 22,102 (66.5%) pediatric ADR reports, with Meningococcal Serogroup C conjugate vaccine reported most frequently (12,106 reports)".

So here again, we see yet another vaccine cropping up as being particularly problematic for young children and teens... It is telling however, that vaccines account for two-thirds of all adverse drug reactions in the UK, considering how hazardous pediatric drug use can be!


Keep Educating Yourself on Vaccines
It is becoming increasingly necessary to continue to educate yourself and your family on the issues surrounding vaccinations of all kinds. There are so many problems; no one article can possibly cover them all.

You can find and search all vaccine related articles on my Latest Vaccine News page. I also recommend you familiarize yourself with the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) web site. As a leader for vaccine safety, the NVIC offers information on everything from laws to informed consent to late-breaking vaccine news.

What You Can Do to Make a Difference
While it seems "old-fashioned," the only truly effective actions you can take to protect the right to informed consent to vaccination and expand vaccine exemptions, is to get personally involved with your state legislators and the leaders in your community. Write or email your elected state representatives and share your concerns. Call them, or better yet, make an appointment to visit them in person in their office. Don't let them forget you!

Mass vaccination policies are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level, and it is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org will give you access to practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community, and when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up-to-date information and call to action items you need at your fingertips to make sure your voice is heard.

Share Your Story with the Media and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with each other, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up. Write a letter to the editor if you have a different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local newspaper. Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only presenting one side of the vaccine story.

You can also share your story on the NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims' page.

I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might be strongly criticized for daring to speak publicly about the "other side" of the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not back down. Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true about vaccination will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations funded by drug companies to dominate the conversation about vaccination. The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead of human beings.

Carefully Select Your Pediatrician
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and vaccination.

However, there is hope.

At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents. It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.

So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child.

And remember, in the end, it's unlikely that any one vaccine is the culprit. Rather curbing autism is a matter of taking a closer look at the overall toxic burden of our children, and the sheer number of vaccines given during sensitive moments of their development.




Source: Medical Hypotheses October 10, 2011
Source: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2011
Source: Video Transcript
Related Links:
Red Alert: The Vaccine Responsible for Half the Awards for Injury and Death

What Every Parent Must Know: This Occurs Before the Age of 6

20 TIMES the Risk of Autism When You Make This Choice...


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/15/vaccines-behind-autism-epidemic.aspx?e_cid=20111115_DNL_art_1

[Ishtar]

SloppyJoe, can you tell me where the graph in the opening post comes from, and also whether it would be OK for me to use it in a health article I'm writing?

Thanks!

[Eagle]

To me it is not just vaccines my daughter is a high functioning autistic but it wasn’t from vaccines I think a lot had to do with the birth control pill that my wife was taking, it took us 5 years after she stopped taking it to have a baby. Then from the very beginning we knew something was different. My wife has continued to have problems with her thyroid. And no it doesn’t run in the family

[Calz]

To me it is not just vaccines my daughter is a high functioning autistic but it wasn’t from vaccines I think a lot had to do with the birth control pill that my wife was taking, it took us 5 years after she stopped taking it to have a baby. Then from the very beginning we knew something was different. My wife has continued to have problems with her thyroid. And no it doesn’t run in the family

Thanks Dig (and always fun when someone changes their "look").

Interesting tidbit to chew on.

[ThePythonicCow]

SloppyJoe, can you tell me where the graph in the opening post comes from, and also whether it would be OK for me to use it in a health article I'm writing?

Thanks!

I did some searching - that graph in Post #1 of this thread, showing rising autism rates, is on at least several autism sites and blogs.

The oldest instance I could find, before NIMH Director Thomas Insel added a quote and his name, is at Rates of Prevalence and "Growing Out of Autism" (http://www.namingandtreating.com/?p=13682), dated December 2009.

Then in April 2010 I see a version with Insel's imprimatur at Vaccines and Autism in America (wshepp's blog) (http://wshepp.blogspot.com/2010/04/dangers-of-vaccines-part-1-mmr-hpv.html).

I tracked down reports of the original study that led to the graph in Post #1 of this thread: Autism Speaks Responds to New Pediatrics Autism Study Putting Prevalence at 1 in 91 American Children, Including 1 in 58 Boys (http://www.autismspeaks.org/about-us/press-releases/autism-speaks-responds-new-pediatrics-autism-study-putting-prevalence-1-91-a).

The report itself is at Prevalence of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children in the US, 2007 (http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/5/1395.full)

Amusing note: the report itself presents statistics through 2007, but all the graphs label the now rather infamous "1 in 91" figure for the year 2009, the year the report was published.

Ishtar - I would suspect it is fine to use this graph in your report. It's "all over" the place. I've see no copyright notices or concerns. If it were me, I'd use the version of the graph (my first link above) without the notorious Insels's imprimatur.

[WhiteFeather]

Think Different, Watch This From Esther Hicks On Autism! Brought A Tear To My Eye In The last Few Seconds Of This Video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5aU1tsdl5o

[vibrations]

Think Different, Watch This From Esther Hicks On Autism! Brought A Tear To My Eye In The last Few Seconds Of This Video.


I totally agree with you and even more with Esther (lol), and I believe, well not only believe, i am absolutely convinced that we all choose our experience and in the same time we help to understand the world to others. A sophisticated very complex interaction of all creation with one and only goal, LOVE more.

And helping to prevent Autism in this physical realm is also an act of love, compassion and solidarity. So whatever we do to prevent artificial actions in form of vaccines which in a huge way provoke this unbalance, is not enough. And I believe that every doctor who defend the vaccination is also putting himself in a karmic way which in a next life will bring him enormously difficult experience - imposed by himself when he'll die.

[bodhii71]

I haven't read any of the above posts. Just wanted to give my own personal experience.
My first son, we vaccinated, he is autistic. After the first year or so, my wife noticed delayed speech and some eccentric behavior. She became very much aware and did a great deal of research, so by the time we had our second son, we were VERY selective which vaccines he received. He's fine.
I was very hard pressed to make the connections at the time, I wanted to believe otherwise.
I have no doubt that it at the very least contributed greatly.

[Ishtar]

Ishtar - I would suspect it is fine to use this graph in your report. It's "all over" the place. I've see no copyright notices or concerns. If it were me, I'd use the version of the graph (my first link above) without the notorious Insels's imprimatur.

Paul, thank you very much. It was very kind of you to do that research for me.

[ThePythonicCow]

Paul, thank you very much. It was very kind of you to do that research for me.
I still couldn't figure out who actually made the chart first, and the chart is misleading.

It mingles data from a 2007 phone survey (my last link above) with other data, of origins unknown to me at least. One cannot necessarily compare numbers obtained by different methods. Also, it labels the 2007 data as 2009.

So, depending on how fussy you are about the "research quality" of your article, this graph may or may not be suitable.

[Flash]

[QUOTE]One thing that has got me thinking when it comes to "newer" disorders, like autism, is wheter it didn't appear until the 1930s because of those vaccines - or - because there simply wasn't a diagnosis for it. For example the rate of a lot of disorders and diseases in the western world seems much higher than in other places - which may be true - but then again there isn't the same system and resources in for example africa or parts of asia where you could get a proper diagnosis.

I can tell you that Autism was about non existent in the 60's not for lack of diagnosis but because it was not there, period. There were no diagnosis because it was about inexistent. I was there then and would not hear of it, nor any similar disease in such big number. Or they died at birth (which cannot be the case for autism) because it was not there.

The increase is exponential, from the 70's on, and diagnosis has been available since, more still since the nineties, yet, exponentiality of the disease has not stop increasing.

It cannot be for lack of diagnosis. Also, in Africa, it is actually rarely seen, most probably not because of lack of diagnosis but because of lack of something else, namely some chemicals or.... vaccines!

[Calz]

I can tell you that Autism was about non existent in the 60's not for lack of diagnosis but because it was not there, period. There were no diagnosis because it was about inexistent. I was there then and would not hear of it, nor any similar disease in such big number. Or they died at birth (which cannot be the case for autism) because it was not there.

The increase is exponential, from the 70's on, and diagnosis has been available since, more still since the nineties, yet, exponentiality of the disease has not stop increasing.

It cannot be for lack of diagnosis. Also, in Africa, it is actually rarely seen, most probably not because of lack of diagnosis but because of lack of something else, namely some chemicals or.... vaccines!

Will borrow a post from another thread that may shed some light on this. Check out the dramatic increase in *number* of vaccinations. Allegedly each and every one does some neurological damage which is accumulative.



CDC Mandatory Vaccine Schedule: 1983 vs 2010

As of late, I've heard several (well intentioned) grandparents use the following argument in favor of blindly vaccinating with any and all injections available in the United States, "Well, you had all your vaccinations when you were born and you are just fine... Why not give them all to your baby?!"

The following chart highlights just one of the reasons that this argument is not logical. Vaccines (and the quantities in which they are given) in the U.S. are dramatically different as we move into 2011 than they were 40, 30, or even 20 years ago.

When it comes to vaccines: Be informed. Know each individual vaccine and the disease it is correlated with. Know your individual child's risk factor both for getting the disease (and/or actually being harmed by it) and the likelihood of adverse effects due to over-vaccination. Know how natural, life-long immunity is built in the body, and how it benefits an individual over his/her lifetime. Understand the most powerful of infant immunizations - exclusive breastfeeding. Make decisions on a vax-by-vax basis. There is no reason to blindly say 'yes' to 36-38 injections before your baby turns 66 months of age.

The Vaccine Book by Dr. Sears (who advocates for an alternative schedule of vaccinations), Take Charge of Your Child's Health by Dr. Wootan (who takes a more natural immunization approach to wellness), The Vaccine Safety Manual and several others are good 'even keeled' places to begin your investigation if you've not previously delved into vaccine and disease prevention research.

11304

Source:

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedules at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/child-schedule.htm


http://www.drmomma.org/2011/01/cdc-mandatory-vaccine-schedule-1983-vs.html

[Calz]

Girl, 13, left in 'waking coma' and sleeps for 23 hours a day after severe reaction to cervical cancer jabs

Lucy Hinks is unable to walk or talk after having injections at school

Parents warn others to check on potential side effects of Cervarix vaccine

By Paul Sims

Last updated at 9:04 AM on 15th November 2011

Bad reaction: Lucy Hinks, 13, began to experience extreme exhaustion soon after having the cervical cancer vaccine alongside classmates. They were told the vaccine had few side-effects and would protect their daughter from cervical cancer.

But Steve and Pauline Hinks are convinced the controversial HPV jab is behind their daughter Lucy’s mystery illness which is making her sleep up to 23 hours a day.

Tests have so far ruled out a brain tumour and glandular fever and the 13-year-old’s paediatric consultant is investigating potential links with the vaccine Cervarix.

The jab was used in a national vaccination programme which started in September 2008. But it has already been linked to several cases of girls displaying severe side-effects.

Before she received the vaccine, Lucy was perfectly healthy, had an excellent school attendance record and was among the top students in her year.

But just weeks after she received the third dose of Cervarix in May this year she began to feel exhausted. By July she had lost a stone in weight and was sleeping almost round-the-clock.

‘Some nights I’ve been so worried that I wake several times to make sure she’s still breathing,’ said her mother.

‘I was concerned about the potential side-effects because Lucy had a severe reaction from the MMR vaccine.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2061267/Schoolgirl-Lucy-Hinks-left-waking-coma-severe-reaction-cervical-cancer-jab.html#ixzz1dpluHZbV

[Flash]

Think Different, Watch This From Esther Hicks On Autism! Brought A Tear To My Eye In The last Few Seconds Of This Video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5aU1tsdl5o

What she is talking about in this video with autistic children being here to teach us freedom and unconditional love may be true for some, mostly for light autism, but I have seen autistic children so badly out of control (meaning litterally climbing on walls while screaming and running, allllllllll day longggg) that I can barely believe these children came here to teach freedom. They seemed caught up in a inner disconnected loop rather than being free.

Unconditional love, their parents definitly had. Loving them immensely, being broken apart because they could not endure the physical 24 hours a day demand on them any longer. Those parents would brake apart litterally. Rate of divorce is almost 100%. I have seen grown up businessmen crying while talking of their son, losing their business because they could not manage anymore the overall stress, and losing by the same token the possibility for treatment of their children. This is going a bit far isn't it telling parents and others that those children are FREE. And the parents where are they? Free or in jail?

I sincerely think she has not worked with autistic children and barely spoke to any. Making, by her speech, parents feel guilty - again - for wanting their kid to be more "normal" just to pleaaaase get a gosh da m brake, and for not looking as having "unconditional" love. Parents of children with difficulties already feel guilt usually thinking they may have something to do with their child difficulties, why pushing it further?

On the other hand, for light autism, yes they are different and accomodations may be then quite realistic and leave a breathing room to the rest of the family (brothers, sisters and parents). In this case, those children being "FREER" is potentially true.

When you ask autistic children how they feel, most of them would tell, when they can speak, that they feel like being awkward, not liked, and mostly in a sort of jail for not being able to communicate properly or for not understanding some behaviors of people. The light autistic children will however become adults who accept their condition and appreciate the positive sides of it, because they can still enjoy life.

Deep autism is something of another world however, it is so tough to handle in any direction or circumstances.

This is my token of little wisdom, on a realistic view of the state of the parents and their children.

[modwiz]

Think Different, Watch This From Esther Hicks On Autism! Brought A Tear To My Eye In The last Few Seconds Of This Video.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5aU1tsdl5o

What she is talking about in this video with autistic children being here to teach us freedom and unconditional love may be true for some, mostly for light autism, but I have seen autistic children so badly out of control (meaning litterally climbing on walls while screaming and running, allllllllll day longggg) that I can barely believe these children came here to teach freedom. They seemed caught up in a inner disconnected loop rather than being free.

Unconditional love, their parents definitly had. Loving them immensely, being broken apart because they could not endure the physical 24 hours a day demand on them any longer. Those parents would brake apart litterally. Rate of divorce is almost 100%. I have seen grown up businessmen crying while talking of their son, losing their business because they could not manage anymore the overall stress, and losing by the same token the possibility for treatment of their children. This is going a bit far isn't it telling parents and others that those children are FREE. And the parents where are they? Free or in jail?

I sincerely think she has not worked with autistic children and barely spoke to any. Making, by her speech, parents feel guilty - again - for wanting their kid to be more "normal" just to pleaaaase get a gosh da m brake, and for not looking as having "unconditional" love. Parents of children with difficulties already feel guilt usually thinking they may have something to do with their child difficulties, why pushing it further?

On the other hand, for light autism, yes they are different and accomodations may be then quite realistic and leave a breathing room to the rest of the family (brothers, sisters and parents). In this case, those children being "FREER" is potentially true.

When you ask autistic children how they feel, most of them would tell, when they can speak, that they feel like being awkward, not liked, and mostly in a sort of jail for not being able to communicate properly or for not understanding some behaviors of people. The light autistic children will however become adults who accept their condition and appreciate the positive sides of it, because they can still enjoy life.

Deep autism is something of another world however, it is so tough to handle in any direction or circumstances.

This is my token of little wisdom, on a realistic view of the state of the parents and their children.

Very well put, Flash. My son, and I have Aspergers, a light Autism. Mine is lighter than his. My mother had it, my father didn't. My son's mother has a mild autism that is not Aspergers, so he got a double genetic dose. We are all coping well and our in joke is that we are fine, it is the rest of the world that is all furked up. 'They' make our point well for us too.

I think a bigger question is the cause of the autism. Genetic autisms are part of the incarnational 'contract' IMO and these types can fall under the explanation that Esther Hicks gives. The iatrogenic autisms are the 'devil's' work and are not part of a learning curve, rather they are curve balls, errant soul trajectories and foul balls. The one issue of freedom in these latter autisms is the freedom to choose what we put into our bodies. Mandatory vaccines often have workarounds but sometimes even when they exist it is made to be a difficult path to follow with many obstacles and road blocks. The whole vaccine issue is a battle, maybe a war, that we need to win if our freedom of choice and sovereignty of our bodies and those of our loved ones is to be honored.

People who want to get vaccines should feel free to choose that path. Any pressure on those of us who choose not to need to be left unharrassed by both the medical profession and our friends and family. The girl in the above story had already exhibited some undesirable results from her MMR vax. What were parents thinking? Were they thinking? I feel bad for them and the girl, as some lessons are a bitch.

In closing, there needs to be a distinction between genetic autism and iatrogenic autism. They are very different conditions. I can see a connection from a rarefied top down view, but it is a discussion few are ready to have in the general population and Esther Hicks is not having that conversation that I can tell.

[Flash]

From all the posts I have read from you Modwiz you seem more balanced than most. You may be one of these case where it is truly the rest of the world that is ****ed up when comparing.

I do agree with you about the differences between genetic autism and iatrogenic autism, the former being an incarnational decision that is in fact a free decision, while the second is a deviation from soul intent or from learning paths. I also agree with the right to chose what is being put into our bodies, at all times.

I can tell you that I will not get a vaccines anylonger and neither my daughter unless one of those doctors succeed in convincing her. It took us a very long time and lots of dough ($) to repair some of the damages caused to my daughter, we are still working at it, and the repairs won't probably ever be total.

That is why I do not appreciate when a wisdom teacher tells parents that they should not want their children to change, to have unconditional love. In my case, unconditional love meant breaking my back working extremely hard to make the money for treatments. That is why I know of other parents lifes with their children, while being in waiting rooms and chatting. I also advise some when the moment is right by telling what may daughter and I did.

My daughter is one who told me that she felt like being in jail, not free, when she could not communicate. She is now really doing fine, joyfull, full of life and love, communicating quite well, writing her own songs and music at 14, and singing them, just different enough to avoid part of the indoctrination and to be original in her creations.

Thanks Modwiz for telling us about you.

[Ishtar]

Paul, thank you very much. It was very kind of you to do that research for me.
I still couldn't figure out who actually made the chart first, and the chart is misleading.

It mingles data from a 2007 phone survey (my last link above) with other data, of origins unknown to me at least. One cannot necessarily compare numbers obtained by different methods. Also, it labels the 2007 data as 2009.

So, depending on how fussy you are about the "research quality" of your article, this graph may or may not be suitable.

Yes, thank you but unfortunately it's not going to be suitable.

I thought it might be too good to be true ... that's why I asked.... well, it IS true to some degree and in one sense, but the mixed sources of data make it non acceptable to a science audience.

Thank you anyway!

[ThePythonicCow]

make it non acceptable to a science audience.
Yup - agreed :).

[Flash]

Sorry mods, posting this everywhere because I think it is very important that parents looking for solutions for their children have access to this information, and because of the search algorithms of the site, so I post it where needed.

I thanks the avalonian below for extremely interesting information about a bacteria having lost its outer shell and therefore hard to detect that would be heavily involved in autism in children as well as other forms of viruses, almost ever present in autistic children. The worst thing: treatment is possible. Please, read carefully and consult the site, there is a whole description of the treatments for autism and autism spectrum misbehavior (such as ADD). Thanks Forgot to write: vaccines would be contaminated with the bacteria.

In the video interview, second tape, near the end, there is a description of the autism findings and their potential treatment as well.


From this thread:MMS causing terrifying nightmares, sleep paralysis, demons in the room?

Posted by fathertedsmate (here)
MMS is a solution that has saved and changed my life,after 10 yrs of PTSD/combat stress,athsma,tinitus(30yrs),athritis,2 stone muscle loss,vertigo,intense fear,uncontrollable reactions,sweats,shingles,constant flem/liquid in nose/throat,constant cough,anxiety,stress,depression,unable to comunicate without sounding like a maniac,just a few of the benefits that come when told you are mentaly inbalanced and the

ETM 567
Sorry, I just cut that quote off rather arbitrarily. Are you familiar with Garth Nicholson and his findings about mycoplasma infections in vets? MMS may very well have helped such an infection, and that may be why it helped you. The odd thing about Nicholson -- and it is unfortunately a long story -- he found these altered mycoplasmas in the blood of vets of the first Gulf War. And he found that the affected vets could take an antibiotic for about a year and get better. But the VA interfered, and told vets that got prescriptions filled for the doxycycline would lose their veterans' benefits.

There is a much longer story. He had to move his lab twice. He was in Texas, at Baylor, and somehow the medical school was associated with a Texas company, owned by the Bushes and their friends, like Baker, that did genetic work with microorganisms. So he found evidence (I think) that they had created this Mycoplasma fermentans incognito
and perhaps sold it to Saddam Hussein, who then may have used it on the vets. He found this because they did tests on inmates at a local prison, and guards at the prison got sick and gave the illness to their families.

Anyway, "they" -- meaning the Bush family friend machines -- went after him, and he had to leave Baylor (I think it was Baylor; it was the hospital associated with Baylor, maybe?) and move to California. But he had to move again. They tried to kill him and his wife with this illness. They wrote a book about it. It's very badly written, by a couple of scientists and no editor, but pretends the story is a novel, changes the names, and basically tells the story. The book is Project Daylily. I have it, because I was looking into the cause of chronic fatigue syndrome, which I have. And that disease shares many symptoms with Gulf War Illness. But they seem not to be caused by the same thing.

It's a fascinating story. Lots of vets died, unfortunately.

This is imho a very important post. In fact, both are, for all the parents having children with Autism and other neurological and/or degenerative diseases. He also have two interviews on his site that are rather instructive, the second one explaining the different virus/microbial infections found in all children with autism.

I would ass the information here to the threads on autism and mms and morgellons if you do not mind.

Thank you

ps.: I went on the Project day Lily site

http://www.projectdaylily.com/

the health site of project day lily

http://www.immed.org/

http://www.projectdaylily.com/


the interview

http://www.policestateplanning.com/project_day_lily.htm

I read everything carefully and listened to the interview, probably life saving information here. Highly recommended reading/listening

[onawah]

Medical journal openly questions science, ethics of HPV vaccinations

Wednesday, January 11, 2012 by: Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034636_vaccinations_quack_science_medical_journals.html#ixzz1jN6iLVhx

http://www.naturalnews.com/034636_vaccinations_quack_science_medical_journals.html

(NaturalNews) On January 12, 2011 the Annals of Medicine published a ground-breaking peer-reviewed paper titled, Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?, 1written by renowned researchers Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., and Christopher Shaw, Ph.D., with the Neural Dynamics research Group, University of British Columbia, in Vancouver. 2.

The article points out to the medical community what most consumers now know about the fraudulent global health agency policies in combination with the pharmaceutical companies lack of science based evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of Gardasil and Cervarix before they were unleashed on unsuspecting parents of adolescents.

Clinical Trials on Healthy People vs. Mass Vaccination Campaigns

Tomljenovic and Shaw clearly state the obvious in their abstract by stating that vaccines represent 'a special category of drugs generally given to healthy individuals and therefore a small level of risk for adverse reactions is acceptable.'

Merck's clinical trials were flawed because they used an aluminum adjuvant as a 'placebo' and only used saline as a comparative for minor, non-serious adverse reactions. With serious adverse reactions, they pooled the results from the saline group and the aluminum 'placebo' group. By doing this, they concealed the true rate of serious reactions.

If FDA approved drugs and vaccines were as safe and effective as Pharma would like consumers to believe the risk level should be negligible to none. The FDA removal of drugs after they have been on the market and damaged desperate people looking for cures who then have to file lawsuits to recover damages is simply unacceptable.

Medical Ethics Questioned

The authors also point out the myth of informed consent - basically a waiver signed by medical consumers that they have been 'educated' about the risk vs. benefit ratio of the drug about to be administered. Tomljenovic and Shaw open their paper citing that 'medical ethics demand that vaccination be carried out with the participant's full and informed consent' and not just the handing out of the HPV vaccine Patient Product Insert - prepared by none other than the vaccine's manufacturer.

What the authors do not cover in this paper is what happens to informed consent when governments grant children the right to consent to medical procedures, such as California's recent passage of AB 499 - basically granting parental rights of children ages 12 and older to the state for the treatment of STD's. Is it really because the 'state' knows better - or is it because legislatures have been paid off by the pharmaceutical companies?

The authors go on to state:

"What is more disconcerting than the aggressive marketing strategies employed by the vaccine manufacturers is the practice by which the medical profession has presented partial information to the public, namely, in a way that generates fear, thus promoting vaccine uptake.........It thus appears that to this date, medical and regulatory entities worldwide continue to provide inaccurate information regarding cervical cancer risk and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, thereby making informed consent regarding vaccination impossible to achieve."

Money Talks - Nobody Walks - but the Vaccine Injured

According to Maplight California - a web site that reveals money's influence on politics, contributions from interest groups to CA legislators who supported the bill were $2,174,648 - more than 28 times the $76,404 given to interest groups who opposed the bill.It is also interesting to note that republican based groups and pro-life groups were on the dissenting side vs. the overwhelming number of liberal and democratic groups supporting the bill.

Similar bills are now in front of South Carolina and Florida legislatures. We are now personal witnesses to the erosion of medical ethics encouraged by politicians abundantly rewarded with special interest contributions.

Tomljenovic and Shaw continue their message by reminding medical professionals that 'contrary to claims that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide, existing data show that this only applies to developing countries. In the Western world cervical cancer is a rare disease with mortality rates that are several times lower than the rate of reported serious adverse reactions (including deaths) from HPV vaccination.'

The author's state - what should become the mantra of all medical practitioners and consumers concerned about vaccine safety and efficacy:

Future vaccination policies should adhere more rigorously to evidence-based medicine and ethical guidelines for informed consent.

Tomljenovic and Shaw cite these key messages:

- To date, the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated, while vaccine risks remain to be fully evaluated.

- Current worldwide HPV immunization practices with either of the two HPV vaccines appear to be neither justified by long-term health benefits nor economically viable, nor is there any evidence that HPV vaccination (even if proven effective against cervical cancer) would reduce the rate of cervical cancer beyond what Pap screening has already achieved.

- Cumulatively, the list of serious adverse reactions related to HPV vaccination worldwide includes deaths, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and cervical cancers.

- Because the HPV vaccination programme has global coverage, the long-term health of many women may be at risk against still unknown vaccine benefits.

- Physicians should adopt a more rigorous evidence-based medicine approach, in order to provide a balanced and objective evaluation of vaccine risks and benefits to their patients.

- The almost exclusive reliance on manufacturers' sponsored studies, often of questionable quality, as a basis for vaccine policy-making should be discontinued.

- Greater efforts should be made to minimize the undue commercial influences on academic institutions and medical research, as this influence may impede unbiased scientific inquiry into important questions about vaccine science and policies.

- Passive adverse event surveillance should be replaced by active surveillance to better understand the true risks associated with vaccines, particularly new vaccines.

The abstract of Tomljenovic and Shaw's paper, Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds? is posted on the SANE Vax Inc. web site. The entire paper can be accessed via this link on or after January 12. Share the 12-page paper with your medical practitioner, school nurses, and boards of education considering enforcing state legislation, and parents or guardians considering HPV vaccination for their child. Should you have difficulty accessing the entire paper you may contact the corresponding author via email at lucijat77@gmail.com.

The entire paper can be accessed via this link on or after January 12. Share the 12-page paper with your medical practitioner, school nurses, and boards of education considering enforcing state legislation, and parents or guardians considering HPV vaccination for their child.

Medical consumers need to demand the healthcare industry stop focusing on 'drug policies' and direct efforts toward uncovering science-based evidence to identify those actually at risk for the disease. As Tomljenovic and Shaw readily point in their dissertation on the HPV vaccine, the risk of cervical cancer is relatively small to justify a mandatory mass vaccination program with vaccines of questionable safety.

SaneVax Inc. views the presentation of partial and/or non-factual information regarding cervical cancer risks and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, as cited above, to be neither scientific nor ethical. These practices do not serve public health interests, nor are they likely to reduce the levels of cervical cancer. Independent evaluation of HPV vaccine safety is urgently needed and should be a priority for government-sponsored research programs.

Sources:

1.Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?Annals of Medicine,

http://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/ebm/record/22188159/full_citation/Human_papillomavirus__HPV__vaccine_policy_and_evidence_based_medicine:_Are_they_at_odds

2. Maplight California -AB 499 - An Act to Amend Section 6926 of the Family Code, Relating to Minors

http://maplight.org/california/bill/2011-ab-499/1007609/total-contributions

Story by Norma Erickson and Leslie Carol Botha of SANEVAX, INC.

Please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/

About the author:
THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine. Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being. We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries.

Articles on this site are written by Norma Erickson, President and Leslie Carol Botha, women's health educator, broadcast journalist and Vice-President Public Relations for SANE Vax, Inc. We also allow content from various contributing authors. Other members include Rosemary Mathis, mother of a Gardasil-injured daughter and Vice President Victim Support; Janny Stokvis, Vice-President Research, Freda Birrell, Secretary and HPV vaccine lobbyist United Kingdom /Scotland, and Linda Thompson, Treasurer.

We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted. Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034636_vaccinations_quack_science_medical_journals.html#ixzz1jN5Ly3S3

[nearing]

Finally, some docs publishing on the dangers of that HPV vaccIne! This should make others docs take notice.

[onawah]

New Evidence Refutes Fraud Findings in Dr. Wakefield Case

oIsFW5phHas

Posted By Dr. Mercola | January 24 2012


In February 1998, the Lancet published Dr. Andrew Wakefield's case series of a group of autistic children with gastric problems, which has become one of the most controversial studies in medicine because part of the patients' story included regression after receiving the MMR vaccine.

The debate is a heated one, as the study suggests there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism.

In an interview I conducted with Dr. Wakefield in 2010, he said he knew he was about to enter treacherous waters when the study was published, and he expected the inevitable backlash from the vaccine industry.

However, "backlash" is putting it mildly, as Dr. Wakefield's reputation was completely smeared.

The latest revelations in this controversy add yet another twist, and suggest that a series of articles published by the BMJ in January 2011 alleging that Wakefield falsified data, making the original Lancet article fraudulent, were in fact the inaccurate ones …

New Investigation Defends Wakefield's Lancet Study

At the heart of the Wakefield controversy has been whether or not the children in the study were, in fact, diagnosed with non-specific colitis, or if that information had been fabricated -- allegations that were largely initiated by investigative journalist Brian Deer.

Writing in the BMJ, research microbiologist David Lewis, of the National Whistleblowers Center, explains that he reviewed histopathological grading sheets by two of Dr. Wakefield's coauthors, pathologists Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony, and concluded there was no fraud committed by Dr. Wakefield:

"As a research microbiologist involved with the collection and examination of colonic biopsy samples, I do not believe that Dr. Wakefield intentionally misinterpreted the grading sheets as evidence of "non-specific colitis." Dhillon indicated "non-specific" in a box associated, in some cases, with other forms of colitis. In addition, if Anthony's grading sheets are similar to ones he completed for the Lancet article, they suggest that he diagnosed "colitis" in a number of the children."

In a press release, Lewis continued:

"The grading sheets and other evidence in Wakefield's files clearly show that it is unreasonable to conclude, based on a comparison of the histological records, that Andrew Wakefield 'faked' a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Now that these records have seen the light of day, it is time for others to stop using them for this purpose as well. False allegations of research misconduct can destroy the careers of even the most accomplished and reputable scientists overnight. It may take years for them to prove their innocence; and even then the damages are often irreparable. In cases where mistakes are made, every effort should be taken to fully restore the reputations and careers of scientists who are falsely accused of research misconduct."

Wakefield is Not the Only Researcher to Look Into the Possible Connection Between MMR Vaccine, Bowel Disease and Autism

While the press continues to battle over Dr. Wakefield's purported guilt or innocence, the bigger issue -- that there appears to be a connection between inflammation, and particularly gut inflammation, and autism -- is getting lost in the shuffle. Plus, other research has confirmed Wakefield's hotly contested findings, linking the MMR triple vaccine with bowel disease and autism -- contrary to what you might hear in the press.

The Daily Mail reported:

" … a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease - and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus … the team's leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: 'Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus. What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is correct.

That study didn't draw any conclusions about specifically what it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine. If that's the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR."

The lead researcher, Stephen J. Walker, Ph.D., was also quick to state however, that this does not necessarily mean the MMR vaccine causes autism. Still, his research notes the same connection that Wakefield's team did, which is that many autistic children have chronic bowel inflammation, and have the vaccine strain of the measles virus in their intestines.

Says Dr. Wakefield of his original 1998 findings:

"… it's been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy… [but] they never get mentioned. All you ever hear is that no one else has ever been able to replicate the findings. I'm afraid that is false."

You can see a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield's controversial findings in this past article. In addition to his hotly contested MMR study, Dr. Wakefield has published dozens of peer-reviewed papers looking at the mechanism and cause of inflammatory bowel disease, and has extensively investigated the brain-bowel connection in the context of children with developmental disorders such as autism. As described below, other researchers are also doing the same …

What You Should Know About Gut Health and Autism …

In her research, Dr. Campbell-McBride discovered that nearly all of the mothers of autistic children have abnormal gut flora, which is significant because newborns inherit their gut flora from their mothers at the time of birth. Establishing normal gut flora in the first 20 days or so of life plays a crucial role in the maturation of your baby's immune system. Babies who develop abnormal gut flora are left with compromised immune systems, putting them at higher risk for suffering vaccine reactions.

If your baby has suboptimal gut flora, vaccines can become the proverbial "last straw"—the trigger that "primes" his/her immune system to develop chronic heath problems.

In short, there is a close connection between abnormal gut flora and abnormal brain development—a condition Dr. Campbell-McBride calls Gut and Psychology Syndrome (GAPS).The best way to prevent GAPS is for the mother to avoid all antibiotics and birth control pills prior to conception and then by breastfeeding and avoiding the use of antibiotics after delivering. This is because they destroy the balance of gut floras and promote the growth of pathogenic bacteria. In addition to breastfeeding,

I highly recommend the use of fermented foods and probiotics for your baby to help reduce his/her risk of GAPS.

Fortunately, it's possible to screen your child for GAPS before he or she is vaccinated, so that you can make a better-informed vaccination decision. Dr. Campbell-McBride describes the entire process in her book. It involves providing a detailed family health history to a knowledgeable healthcare provider, combined with stool and urine analysis, and these combine to give you a picture of your baby's gut health and overall immune status.Dr. Campbell-McBride states:

"If your child has abnormal gut flora, we can assume that your child has compromised immunity, and these children must not be vaccinated with the standard vaccination protocol because they simply get damaged by it. They should not be vaccinated."

These non-invasive tests are now available in most laboratories around the world for, typically, $80 to $100 each. This cost is insignificant compared to the incredible expense of treating an autistic child, once the damage is done.

New research published by the American Society for Microbiology further contends:

"Many children with autism have gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances that can complicate clinical management and contribute to behavioral problems. Understanding the molecular and microbial underpinnings of these GI issues is of paramount importance for elucidating pathogenesis, rendering diagnosis, and administering informed treatment.

Here we describe an association between high levels of intestinal, mucoepithelial-associated Sutterella species and GI disturbances in children with autism. These findings elevate this little-recognized bacterium to the forefront by demonstrating that Sutterella is a major component of the microbiota in over half of children with autism and gastrointestinal dysfunction (AUT-GI) and is absent in children with only gastrointestinal dysfunction (Control-GI) evaluated in this study."

Remember, you make serious, at times life-and-death, decisions based on what and who you believe … The avalanche of autism must be curbed—and quickly! And for now the burden rests on you, the parent, to take control of your and your child's health, and to arm yourself with information that can have life-altering ramifications when it comes to making health care decisions.

Please, as always, make your vaccination decisions educated ones.

Related Links:
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield
How a Physician Cured Her Son's Autism...
New Research Shows Link Between MMR Vaccine and Autism

[Referee]

Loook at the case in NY 12 girls in their teens and just took Gaurdasil.......

Xbdic9MaED8

[onawah]

Prof Walker-Smith Cleared and the Beginning of the End for Allegations Against Andrew Wakefield
This is such good news!!!!!!!!


"We are absolutely delighted with this judgment, which vindicates Professor Walker-Smith. John Walker-Smith was one of the world's leading gastroenterologists. It was incomprehensible that he should have been threatened with being struck off in the first place.

This judgment calls into question the independence and competence of the GMC, which was determined all along to pursue a witch-hunt against Professor Walker-Smith, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Professor Simon Murch after they reported their research into the link between bowel disease and regressive autism."

Throughout the hearings (the longest in GMC history) the GMC deliberately chose to cherry-pick the evidence to suit their prejudice against these doctors, who had always acted in the very best interests of the children they treated."

--DAVID THROWER, autism father

"Prof Walker-Smith Cleared and the Beginning of the End for Allegations Against Andrew Wakefield

By John Stone
http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/p...wakefield.html



The exoneration of John Walker-Smith – a great and good man - is the best news our community has had for years. For years Prof Walker-Smith, himself, has stayed well clear of the MMR controversy but the truth is that he was drawn with Prof Simon Murch into politically motivated allegations against Andrew Wakefield by journalist Brian Deer and Liberal-Democrat politician Evan Harris under the auspices of the Sunday Times.
Deer, himself, recollected in the British Medical Journal being approached by Sunday Times section editor Paul Nuki to find something “big” on MMR, and was later to come to an exotic arrangement with the General Medical Lawyers not to be named as the complainant against the three doctors while continuing to report on the matter. Nuki was apparently the son of a doctor who sat on Committee on Safety in Medicines when MMR was introduced, and he was eventually to leave the Sunday Times to run the UK National Health Service’s main website, NHS Choices. It was the misconstruction of events by Deer, Harris and the GMC which has led to years of purgatory for not only Walker-Smith, Wakefield and Murch but for thousands of children denied proper medical investigation and treatment as a result of the witch-hunt. It is worth noting that the UK Leveson Inquiry, set up to look into media abuse and particular the affairs of News International has so far refused to look in to any of these matters.
Meanwhile, the BBC in an act of doublethink of which only it could be capable has pronounced the 1998 Lancet paper still “discredited” on the day that along with Prof John Walker-Smith it has been completely exonerated.
There is no doubt that the lies and hypocrisy will continue, and of course now it is not only the Murdoch owned media that is implicated. But it is a huge victory.

John Stone is UK Editor for Age of Autism.

[onawah]

This is quite a landmark event for anti-vaccine advocates.
I'm a little surprised there hasn't been more response.
:bump:

[onawah]

Dr. Russell Blaylock interview on mandatory vaccine trials, fraudulent vaccine science, and vaccine ethics - March 2012
The Health Ranger interviews neurosurgeon, author and researcher Dr. Russell Blaylock, the foremost authority on excitoxins such as MSG and aspartame. Dr. Blaylock is the author of "Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills." In this interview, Dr. Blaylock covers:

* How the vaccine industry's insistence on mandatory participation in vaccine trials is a violation of Nuremburg medical code (or our protection as citizens)

* Why Dr. Blaylock compares the corrupt logic and attitudes of the vaccine industry to Nazi Germany

* How most of the damage done by vaccines is hidden

* The truth about the real number of vaccine reactions and serious complications (esp. from Gardasil)

Learn more at: BlaylockWellnessCenter.com and RussellBlaylockMD.com

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=DFBE7C32CBDBF43B7342333B7D827EB0

[Rantaak]

http://images.businessweek.com/cms/2011-11-30/etc_correlation50__01__960.jpg

Clearly, correlation does not imply causality.

The reason we see more austere folk these days has to do with the alignment of incarnational cycles and the coming age. The mind is not born purely of the body - it is synthesized between the body and the soul.

I'm not saying vaccines are good, by the way. They are quite toxic. Children know - that's why they scream so much when you try and inject them.

[onawah]

Italy – Court Holds MMR Vaccine Causes Autism – III: English Translation Of Court Decision


Additionally, it appears the judgement of the Italian Court was by consent, which also appears to mean 1) the Italian health authorities did not contest the findings and 2) they cannot appeal. "

Posted on May 23, 2012 by ChildHealthSafety
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...t-translation/


STOP PRESS:
The Italian Court Decision is not a “one-off”. People have forgotten – We have been here before.
Just posted 28/May/12 – Italy – Court Holds MMR Vaccine Causes Autism – IV: – BUT – So Has The USA – Some Autism History
Original CHS article now continues:
We present here a professional medical translation of the full text of the decision of the Italian Court of Rimini holding that the MMR vaccine causes autism in children. First a few observations. The MMR vaccines used in Italy prior to 2007 were is Merck’s MMR II, GSK’s Priorix and Morupar, from Chiron [until the latter was withdrawn urgently on short notice by W.H.O. because it was unsafe: clickhereandherefor copies of W.H.O. and other documents - [Green text updated 26/5/12]]. Morupar is a Urabe mumps virus strain containing vaccine, which is the type abandoned unilaterally and urgently in the UK in September 1992 by the manufacturer [a GSK company] for legal reasons because of the high levels of all kinds of adverse reactions it causes. It was done so urgently that the UK’s Department of Health was not even given a week to break the news. However, the kind of MMR vaccine Hannah Poling in the US received with 8 other vaccines on the same day would have been Merck’s MMR vaccine containing the Jeryl Lynn strain of mumps virus. [US Government In US$20 million Legal Settlement For Vaccine Caused Autism Case] And here is the key part of the Italian Court’s judgement:
The medicolegal and auxilary medicolegal assessments must be conducted according to their merits, which, on the basis of an in depth examination of the case in the light of the specialist literature to date, has conclusively established that the young child is suffering from AUTISTIC DISORDER ASSOCIATED WITH MEDIUM COGNITIVE DELAY ascribed with reasonable scientific probability due to the administration of the vaccine MMR occurring on the date 26\3\2004 at the ALS of Riccione It should also be acknowledged that the auxiliary evaluation pursuant to the Medical Commission has expressed the view that there is a permanent impairment of physical and mental integrity established, ascribed to the first category of Table A, attached to the DPR 30 \ 12 \ 81 n.834.

read the rest at http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...t-translation/

[music]

Full article here (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspx)

"As a gastrointestinal surgeon, Dr. Wakefield has investigated the connection between developmental disorders and bowel disease, and early exposure to vaccines. For example, in the beginning of our interview, he discusses the curious link between an unusual exposure to the measles virus and subsequent development of Crohn’s disease, and in many cases, autism.

One of the routes of this type of exposure is clearly vaccination."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d40suCKnjbI

"One of the primary reasons for this interview was to discuss Dr. Wakefield’s recent media exposure, and allow him the opportunity to finally set the public record straight.

As you probably know, the scientific peer-review process is designed to ferret out the truth. But in some cases, such as the case of Dr. Wakefield, this process can become perverted by conflicts of interest.

There are tens, if not hundreds of billions of dollars involved in the vaccine industry, and as a consequence there’s major pressure to suppress negative findings, such as the findings Dr. Wakefield uncovered.

In the last few months, he has been severely criticized in the media. Like every story there are always two sides and up until now he has not shared his due to advice he had received from his attorneys. That advice has now changed, and I wanted to provide him with the opportunity to tell his side of the story. In this interview, Dr. Wakefield opens up publicly for the first time.

If you have any interest in the vaccine controversy, I can strongly assure you that watching this fascinating video will be very rewarding."

[ThePythonicCow]

Full article here (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspx)

"As a gastrointestinal surgeon, Dr. Wakefield has investigated the connection between developmental disorders and bowel disease, and early exposure to vaccines. For example, in the beginning of our interview, he discusses the curious link between an unusual exposure to the measles virus and subsequent development of Crohn’s disease, and in many cases, autism.

One of the routes of this type of exposure is clearly vaccination."
I have merged this fine post in with the existing thread discussing this topic.

Dr. Mercola originally posted this at the location you linked, Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield (April 10, 2010) (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspx).

Mercola then posted the interview again, a couple of years later in the article at New Evidence Refutes Fraud Findings in Dr. Wakefield Case (January 24, 2012) (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/24/new-evidence-refutes-fraud-findings-in-dr-wakefield-case.aspx), with some new information from a series of articles published by the BMJ in January 2011 on an investigation defending Wakefield's Lancet Study. Mercola's update was posted above in this thread by onawah in Post #43 (Jan 21, 2012) (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?32372-Autism-and-vaccines&p=409970&viewfull=1#post409970).

[lookbeyond]

Adding to the list!!

[music]

Thanks Paul. Awareness is growing, even convential GPs are beginning to question vaccination. There is no stopping the truth.

I would like to thank you in general, Paul, for your postings on health-related matters. They are always enlightening. Thank you.

[Hervé]

Going even beyond the buying into, and "agreeing" to, "their" PR peddling that there is such a thing as autism:


The hoax at the bottom of Autism and Alzheimer’s (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/the-hoax-at-the-bottom-of-autism-and-alzheimers/)
by Jon Rappoport March 22, 2013
www.nomorefakenews.com (http://www.nomoredakenews.com/)

For the medical cartel, Autism and Alzheimer’s are big, big business. Profits are soaring.

These two conditions are promoted as specific diseases. That’s where all the trouble starts.

If you read the Alzheimer’s and Autism definitions, which are the criteria for diagnosis contained in the psychiatric Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), you find there are no physical tests of any kind.

No blood tests, no saliva tests, no urine tests, no genetic tests, no brain scans.

Instead, what you see are lists and menus of behaviors.

What does this mean?

First of all, it means researchers haven’t found the cause of these conditions. If they had, they would state it.

So how do you say you’ve located a specific disease if you don’t know the cause? Answer: you can’t.

Take four people who are 70 years old and are experiencing severe memory loss. You’re a researcher. You don’t know why these people have this problem. You can guess, you can talk about maybe-this or maybe-that, but you don’t know.

Therefore, you can’t say the cause of the memory loss in each case is the same. It might well be different for each person.

Should you make up a label like Alzheimer’s and slap it on all four people? Of course not. A single label means a single cause. Otherwise, why use the label?

But you don’t know the cause. No matter how many behavioral characteristics of memory loss you name, you don’t know the cause.

Therefore, you have no business applying a single label to those four people. That’s not science. It might be marketing for drugs, it might be a lot of things, it might be about obtaining grant monies, but it isn’t science.

Take four young children who have suddenly withdrawn from the world. Same principle applies. If you slap them with the Autism label, you’re lying. You don’t know the cause of that withdrawal in any of the children.

Now, if you were the parent of one of these children, and you noticed that soon after the child was stuck with multiple vaccines, he developed a fever and then he withdrew from the world, you would, indeed, know something vital.

But if you’re an unbiased researcher a thousand miles away from these four children, all you know, at the outset, is that they all withdrew.

In two cases, the cause might have been vaccination. In another case, it might have been severe and chronic malnutrition or a reaction to heavy metals in food. In another case, the child might have developed a brain lesion. There are a number of possibilities.

Why then slap all four children with the label Autism?

Just because they exhibit the same general characteristic? That’s patently ridiculous.

Let’s take this a step farther. Suppose you had a group of 500 children, all of whom withdrew and folded up after receiving a load of vaccine. You know these vaccines contain toxins. You know the toxins were injected. You know the toxins can cause neurological damage.

Well, what are you waiting for? These are cases of VACCINE DAMAGE. It’s not Autism caused by vaccine damage. It’s not Autism or Cd3syt or Vcti45 or any other arbitrary label. It’s not a disease or a disorder. It’s poisoning. Do you say a person who develops a severe and chronic problem after eating fish loaded with poison has a disease? Is it the fish-eating disease?

Of course, we know that exonerating vaccines keeps a giant industry from destruction. And we know that putting a disease label on people opens the door to enormous profits. Drug-company profits. “Well, we’re researching several promising medicines for Autism…”

You don’t hear, “We’re investigating remedies for vaccine poisoning and exposure to industrial pollutants.”

Alzheimer’s researchers are very fond of talking about “biomarkers” and “imaging.” They keep testing blood and the spinal fluid. But they don’t know enough to include the results of those tests in the official definition of Alzheimer’s.

And think about this: suppose one biomarker finally emerges as a common denominator in a study examining 5000 people who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s? Who is to say the cause of that biomarker is the same in all 5000 people? This is not a trivial point. It’s crucial.

If, for example, chemicals can cause genetic changes, and then cancer researchers hail “new genetic findings in investigating the cause of cancer,” at what level are they plugging into the true situation? If they keep ignoring the chemicals, how far are they going to get?

Researchers and the press keep promoting a fairy tale: “If we diagnose people who show the same behavioral factors with a single disease label, and if we keep examining these people for common biomarkers, we’ll find the cause of the disease.”

Well, look at the DSM. It contains 297 official disorders, all labeled. Many of these so-called disorders have been investigated for decades. And yet, not one disorder lists a specific across-the-board diagnostic test that can define it.

Taking all this to a conclusion, we have this: there is no reason to suppose that Alzheimer’s or Autism exists.

Damage exists. And there are cogent reasons to infer that, in different individuals, the causes are different.

Therefore, what we need are very capable and independent-minded health practitioners who can investigate one patient at a time and find out what really caused his/her problem.

That is why, when somebody tells me he’s found the cause of Alzheimer’s or Autism, and the cure, I know he’s on the wrong track. He failed to notice that these conditions don’t exist. Damage exists.

In the alternative field, I’ve read journal articles that begin: “New discovery may revolutionize the treatment of Alzheimer’s…”

The author of the article was bamboozled. He accepted the idea that Alzheimer’s was a single disease. His opening sentence should have read: “New discovery may revolutionize the treatment of that thing that doesn’t exist…”

Then he and everybody else would see the error.

Damage exists. Memory loss exists. Withdrawing from the world exists. Suffering exists. Pain exists. Finding what caused it in a single patient, one at a time, is a step toward healing.

And healing is what it’s supposed to be all about.

The correct metaphor here is the detective. Suppose he says, “Well, we have a murder, and we know that murder is caused by bullets. So we’ll find the bullets and that will constitute the solution to the case.”

The detective investigates each case on its own facts and merits. He brings a wealth of experience to his work. He knows patterns in murders. He knows what sometimes turns out to be the answer. He applies what he knows. He uses clues. He uses logic. He tries one avenue, and if it doesn’t pan out, he embarks on another avenue. He keeps looking. He provisionally uses generalities, but he also avoids them. This is called intelligence. It’s called discernment. It’s called caring about finding the truth.

If genuine healing were the objective, practitioners would approach so-called Alzheimer’s and Autism patients very differently.

The fact that most medical doctors don’t is, at the very least, criminal negligence.

Back in the 1990′s, I interviewed the mother of a boy who had been diagnosed with Autism. He wasn’t a case of vaccine damage, because he’d never been vaccinated.

His health practitioner, during an extensive conversation with the mother, did discover a forgotten head injury at the age of three. The boy was now 16.

The practitioner tried a course of hyperbaric oxygen treatments, based on the hypothesis that some brain cells were in an “idling state,” and had never awakened after the injury. The treatments helped somewhat. The boy became a bit more communicative.

The practitioner then shifted the boy’s diet several times, and in the process found out he was having a severe and chronic reaction to milk and other dairy products. So they were eliminated from the diet. After a month, the boy came a bit more out of his shell. His awkward physical movements lessened.

Supplementation with minerals produced further results. The boy’s speech cleared up gradually. He mumbled less. His spoke more forcefully.

At this point, for the first time, the boy was willing to undertake a light exercise program. After a month or so, it produced dividends. His muscle tone improved, and he enjoyed short runs. He’d return from these runs with fierce enthusiasm. He was happy that his coordination was increasing.

Several new supplement protocols were tried. One of them included a meal-replacement drink that he liked. He came further out of his shell. His mother began home schooling him. His writing was no longer a dense scribble. He could focus on his work.

The boy went through another series of hyperbaric oxygen treatments. This time the results were more visible. His face, which tended to be mask-like, relaxed. He became more animated.

The supplement regime was enhanced with a ginseng adaptogen and a different type of magnesium. The boy received several adjustments from a chiropractor, who had been trained in the original techniques of the art.

A month later, the boy’s communication with his parents and his neighbors reached a new level. He had recovered a significant part of his life.

I asked the practitioner whether he would apply that entire course of treatment across the board for all children diagnosed with Autism.

“Absolutely not,” he said. “I don’t do ‘across-the-board’ anything.”

When I told a doctor what happened to this boy, he said, “It wasn’t Autism to begin with. He was misdiagnosed. It was a head injury.”

“No,” I said. “Nothing is Autism.”

He stared at me and then he smiled. “I know where you’re going with this,” he said.

“So?”

“Yeah,” he said. “They don’t have a cause for Autism.”

“So they have no right to say it’s a disease with a single cause.”

He scratched his head and walked away.

There is yet another reason the medical cartel wants to maintain this fiction about Autism and Alzheimer’s. It’s about controlling the research, of course. Keeping a lid on the fact that chemicals and inserted genes in the food supply; water contaminated with chemicals, including fluorides; heavy-metal particles sprayed in the skies; radiation; vaccines; medical drugs; industrial pollution and dumping; and other factors have been producing the symptoms of what is being called Autism and Alzheimer’s.

Covering all that up is a major priority. One dirty hand washes another.

Sources: “Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type Symptoms and Diagnosis,” psychtreatment.com; “DSM-IV Criteria Pervasive Developmental Disorders,” firstsigns.org.

Jon Rappoport

PS: this all fall under the rubrique of "Propaganda" and "Psyops," see this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?54217-Their-Mind-and-the-Emotional-Matrix-that-we-create-with-it.&p=652209&viewfull=1#post652209) <---

[conk]

And vaccines have done some good.


I disagree completely. There is not one shred of scientific evidence that vaccines have ever done any good. If you look at the stats of the various diseases (the original stats, not the brushed-up ones), you will find that each disease had already heavily declined by the time the vaccine was introduced, or, as is the case of TB, the disease grew in occurrence parallel to administering vaccines.

The rate of autism is a lot higher in the US than in other Western countries; the rate of vaccination in the population of the US is also considerably higher compared to other Western countries. In Asia and such, the rate of vaccination is a lot lower than the BiPs would like, but then those third-world countries have a huge problem with in-breeding, which means, as far as the BiPs are concerned, they don't need to "help" the depopulation agenda, since those nations are doing a good job all by themselves.This is true. The vaccine is introduced at the top of the bell curve. The vaccine gets the credit for the natural falloff on the right side of the bell curve.

You don't need to link vaccines to autism in order to convince yourself to avoid them. They are multiple, deadly reasons to. Also, Yes, autism can be linked to vaccines. Autism can be CURED by populating the gut bacteria. Science is just now realizing this concentration of beneficial bacteria in the colon is essential a new organ! At least new as far as our understanding of the physical body. Autistic children are helped tremendously by adding fermented foods to their diet and eliminating all sugars that feed bad bacteria. this process is essential and should not be ignored by parents of these wonderful children.

[william r sanford72]

ONAWAH..good job!!..as i posted before ..it was a battle to find a loop hole in refusing vac. for our kids.our oldest daughter Ravyn..did get over half the set vacs...buy the time we had enough courage to fight the system.she did devolpe bowl issues.that took 2 years to fix.. by the time our youngest elijah was born they were waiting with in 3 hours of his birth with hep c??...vac. 3 freaking hours man!!! i had to argue with nurses and a doc...not good....i guess my point is we didnt know we had a choice..we didnt have internet or anyway to no how to fight..i wish i could start a thread on how parents can refuse and not be punished...state by state exemption laws for vacs. that would be helpful.thanks onawah.you have courage.sorry.no spell chk.

[Flash]

Going even beyond the buying into, and "agreeing" to, "their" PR peddling that there is such a thing as autism:


The hoax at the bottom of Autism and Alzheimer’s (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/the-hoax-at-the-bottom-of-autism-and-alzheimers/)
by Jon Rappoport March 22, 2013
www.nomorefakenews.com (http://www.nomoredakenews.com/)

For the medical cartel, Autism and Alzheimer’s are big, big business. Profits are soaring.

These two conditions are promoted as specific diseases. That’s where all the trouble starts.

If you read the Alzheimer’s and Autism definitions, which are the criteria for diagnosis contained in the psychiatric Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), you find there are no physical tests of any kind.

No blood tests, no saliva tests, no urine tests, no genetic tests, no brain scans.

Instead, what you see are lists and menus of behaviors.

What does this mean?

First of all, it means researchers haven’t found the cause of these conditions. If they had, they would state it.

So how do you say you’ve located a specific disease if you don’t know the cause? Answer: you can’t.

Take four people who are 70 years old and are experiencing severe memory loss. You’re a researcher. You don’t know why these people have this problem. You can guess, you can talk about maybe-this or maybe-that, but you don’t know.

Therefore, you can’t say the cause of the memory loss in each case is the same. It might well be different for each person.

Should you make up a label like Alzheimer’s and slap it on all four people? Of course not. A single label means a single cause. Otherwise, why use the label?

But you don’t know the cause. No matter how many behavioral characteristics of memory loss you name, you don’t know the cause.

Therefore, you have no business applying a single label to those four people. That’s not science. It might be marketing for drugs, it might be a lot of things, it might be about obtaining grant monies, but it isn’t science.

Take four young children who have suddenly withdrawn from the world. Same principle applies. If you slap them with the Autism label, you’re lying. You don’t know the cause of that withdrawal in any of the children.

Now, if you were the parent of one of these children, and you noticed that soon after the child was stuck with multiple vaccines, he developed a fever and then he withdrew from the world, you would, indeed, know something vital.

But if you’re an unbiased researcher a thousand miles away from these four children, all you know, at the outset, is that they all withdrew.

In two cases, the cause might have been vaccination. In another case, it might have been severe and chronic malnutrition or a reaction to heavy metals in food. In another case, the child might have developed a brain lesion. There are a number of possibilities.

Why then slap all four children with the label Autism?

Just because they exhibit the same general characteristic? That’s patently ridiculous.

Let’s take this a step farther. Suppose you had a group of 500 children, all of whom withdrew and folded up after receiving a load of vaccine. You know these vaccines contain toxins. You know the toxins were injected. You know the toxins can cause neurological damage.

Well, what are you waiting for? These are cases of VACCINE DAMAGE. It’s not Autism caused by vaccine damage. It’s not Autism or Cd3syt or Vcti45 or any other arbitrary label. It’s not a disease or a disorder. It’s poisoning. Do you say a person who develops a severe and chronic problem after eating fish loaded with poison has a disease? Is it the fish-eating disease?

Of course, we know that exonerating vaccines keeps a giant industry from destruction. And we know that putting a disease label on people opens the door to enormous profits. Drug-company profits. “Well, we’re researching several promising medicines for Autism…”

You don’t hear, “We’re investigating remedies for vaccine poisoning and exposure to industrial pollutants.”

Alzheimer’s researchers are very fond of talking about “biomarkers” and “imaging.” They keep testing blood and the spinal fluid. But they don’t know enough to include the results of those tests in the official definition of Alzheimer’s.

And think about this: suppose one biomarker finally emerges as a common denominator in a study examining 5000 people who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s? Who is to say the cause of that biomarker is the same in all 5000 people? This is not a trivial point. It’s crucial.

If, for example, chemicals can cause genetic changes, and then cancer researchers hail “new genetic findings in investigating the cause of cancer,” at what level are they plugging into the true situation? If they keep ignoring the chemicals, how far are they going to get?

Researchers and the press keep promoting a fairy tale: “If we diagnose people who show the same behavioral factors with a single disease label, and if we keep examining these people for common biomarkers, we’ll find the cause of the disease.”

Well, look at the DSM. It contains 297 official disorders, all labeled. Many of these so-called disorders have been investigated for decades. And yet, not one disorder lists a specific across-the-board diagnostic test that can define it.

Taking all this to a conclusion, we have this: there is no reason to suppose that Alzheimer’s or Autism exists.

Damage exists. And there are cogent reasons to infer that, in different individuals, the causes are different.

Therefore, what we need are very capable and independent-minded health practitioners who can investigate one patient at a time and find out what really caused his/her problem.

That is why, when somebody tells me he’s found the cause of Alzheimer’s or Autism, and the cure, I know he’s on the wrong track. He failed to notice that these conditions don’t exist. Damage exists.

In the alternative field, I’ve read journal articles that begin: “New discovery may revolutionize the treatment of Alzheimer’s…”

The author of the article was bamboozled. He accepted the idea that Alzheimer’s was a single disease. His opening sentence should have read: “New discovery may revolutionize the treatment of that thing that doesn’t exist…”

Then he and everybody else would see the error.

Damage exists. Memory loss exists. Withdrawing from the world exists. Suffering exists. Pain exists. Finding what caused it in a single patient, one at a time, is a step toward healing.

And healing is what it’s supposed to be all about.

The correct metaphor here is the detective. Suppose he says, “Well, we have a murder, and we know that murder is caused by bullets. So we’ll find the bullets and that will constitute the solution to the case.”

The detective investigates each case on its own facts and merits. He brings a wealth of experience to his work. He knows patterns in murders. He knows what sometimes turns out to be the answer. He applies what he knows. He uses clues. He uses logic. He tries one avenue, and if it doesn’t pan out, he embarks on another avenue. He keeps looking. He provisionally uses generalities, but he also avoids them. This is called intelligence. It’s called discernment. It’s called caring about finding the truth.

If genuine healing were the objective, practitioners would approach so-called Alzheimer’s and Autism patients very differently.

The fact that most medical doctors don’t is, at the very least, criminal negligence.

Back in the 1990′s, I interviewed the mother of a boy who had been diagnosed with Autism. He wasn’t a case of vaccine damage, because he’d never been vaccinated.

His health practitioner, during an extensive conversation with the mother, did discover a forgotten head injury at the age of three. The boy was now 16.

The practitioner tried a course of hyperbaric oxygen treatments, based on the hypothesis that some brain cells were in an “idling state,” and had never awakened after the injury. The treatments helped somewhat. The boy became a bit more communicative.

The practitioner then shifted the boy’s diet several times, and in the process found out he was having a severe and chronic reaction to milk and other dairy products. So they were eliminated from the diet. After a month, the boy came a bit more out of his shell. His awkward physical movements lessened.

Supplementation with minerals produced further results. The boy’s speech cleared up gradually. He mumbled less. His spoke more forcefully.

At this point, for the first time, the boy was willing to undertake a light exercise program. After a month or so, it produced dividends. His muscle tone improved, and he enjoyed short runs. He’d return from these runs with fierce enthusiasm. He was happy that his coordination was increasing.

Several new supplement protocols were tried. One of them included a meal-replacement drink that he liked. He came further out of his shell. His mother began home schooling him. His writing was no longer a dense scribble. He could focus on his work.

The boy went through another series of hyperbaric oxygen treatments. This time the results were more visible. His face, which tended to be mask-like, relaxed. He became more animated.

The supplement regime was enhanced with a ginseng adaptogen and a different type of magnesium. The boy received several adjustments from a chiropractor, who had been trained in the original techniques of the art.

A month later, the boy’s communication with his parents and his neighbors reached a new level. He had recovered a significant part of his life.

I asked the practitioner whether he would apply that entire course of treatment across the board for all children diagnosed with Autism.

“Absolutely not,” he said. “I don’t do ‘across-the-board’ anything.”

When I told a doctor what happened to this boy, he said, “It wasn’t Autism to begin with. He was misdiagnosed. It was a head injury.”

“No,” I said. “Nothing is Autism.”

He stared at me and then he smiled. “I know where you’re going with this,” he said.

“So?”

“Yeah,” he said. “They don’t have a cause for Autism.”

“So they have no right to say it’s a disease with a single cause.”

He scratched his head and walked away.

There is yet another reason the medical cartel wants to maintain this fiction about Autism and Alzheimer’s. It’s about controlling the research, of course. Keeping a lid on the fact that chemicals and inserted genes in the food supply; water contaminated with chemicals, including fluorides; heavy-metal particles sprayed in the skies; radiation; vaccines; medical drugs; industrial pollution and dumping; and other factors have been producing the symptoms of what is being called Autism and Alzheimer’s.

Covering all that up is a major priority. One dirty hand washes another.

Sources: “Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type Symptoms and Diagnosis,” psychtreatment.com; “DSM-IV Criteria Pervasive Developmental Disorders,” firstsigns.org.

Jon Rappoport

PS: this all fall under the rubrique of "Propaganda" and "Psyops," see this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?54217-Their-Mind-and-the-Emotional-Matrix-that-we-create-with-it.&p=652209&viewfull=1#post652209) <---

Except for home schooling, I had pretty much the same protocol for my daughter. She was diagnosed dysphasic with definite signs of autism. And this protocol worked. DIet, supplement, hyperbaric and special retraining (muscular training as well as learning). I started much younger, retraining, I never thought of head injury though. Reviewing it, maybe there is some link, but I am not sure. Mine went to a special school for neurologically learning disable, with smaller classes and it worked.

Mine is pretty much normal now. Just a trained eye can see some left over neurological light impairments. So she will have a regular life.

This protocol works, vitamins have to be adjusted for the precise deficiencies, hyperbar I did once, 40 sessions, would be good to have another one.

However, prepare your wallet, all these are expensive. What could love for our child do.