PDA

View Full Version : FREE ENERGY: Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong



ktlight
3rd November 2011, 09:22
"Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong. Report reveals energy supression is alive and well."

edS2aelXi7I

FYI:
"
The patent process of a FREE energy device involves different conditions in comparison to patenting other inventions. The inventor must be aware of these specifically - As these conditions can prevent the invention from reaching the public.

The information on this page describes the elements which concern the patenting of FREE energy technology. Panacea is also providing this information to help inventors learn about the advantages of patenting a FREE energy device verses releasing it through a general purpose license, creative commons and open source.The aim here is to assist the inventor to get their technology known and out to the public.

The inventor must understand ALL the realities of the situation where FREE energy patents are concerned. First one must be aware of the reports from past FREE energy inventors especially a particular patent office employee describing an ever growing hold over FREE energy technology via the corporate patenting process.Then you must understand that there are ways around this.


Taken from the documentary "A machine to die for". This shot was covering the
patent suppression case of the Joseph Newman free energy device.

Tom Valone is a former patent examiner who was fired years ago from the patent office and recently won a lawsuit against the US Patent Office. Tom was awarded reinstatement and six years of back pay. Dr Thomas Valone estimated that patent applications for FREE ENERGY related technology have been "secretized" over 3,000 times over the years.

In a 2001 email to Gary Vesperman, Valone wrote in part: Quote-"As a former Patent Examiner, I can tell you that the number of "securitized" patents in the vault at the Patent Office (Park 5 Bldg.) is closer to 4000 or more. They never receive a patent number, and the inventor is rarely, if ever, compensated by the government for use of the invention." The U.S. Patent Office has a nine-member committee that screens patents for national security implications. A hidden purpose of this committee is to also screen energy-related patents which could threaten the power and fossil fuel companies, -End Quote

The US Patent Office reports that these patents are "protected" for "National Security reasons". Reference: SECRECY ORDER-(Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188) Reference: The US military reviews all patents before a examiner sees them. The Government could take a patent away from you and classify it as secret."

source for more
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/patentoffice.htm

The One
3rd November 2011, 20:59
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/November20111/newman20patent20suppression.jpg

Tom Valone is a former patent examiner who was fired years ago from the patent office and recently won a lawsuit against the US Patent Office. Tom was awarded reinstatement and six years of back pay. Dr Thomas Valone estimated that patent applications for FREE ENERGY related technology have been "secretized" over 3,000 times over the years.

In a 2001 email to Gary Vesperman, Valone wrote in part: Quote-"As a former Patent Examiner, I can tell you that the number of "securitized" patents in the vault at the Patent Office (Park 5 Bldg.) is closer to 4000 or more. They never receive a patent number, and the inventor is rarely, if ever, compensated by the government for use of the invention." The U.S. Patent Office has a nine-member committee that screens patents for national security implications. A hidden purpose of this committee is to also screen energy-related patents which could threaten the power and fossil fuel companies.

The US Patent Office reports that these patents are "protected" for "National Security reasons". Reference: SECRECY ORDER-(Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188) Reference: The US military reviews all patents before a examiner sees them. The Government could take a patent away from you and classify it as secret. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=secrecy%20order-(title%2035%2C%20united%20states%20code%20(1952)%2C%20&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.padrak.com%2Fine%2FINE13.html&ei=JQCzTo7ZMYj48QOsqeiEBQ&usg=AFQjCNG0-APdWFYBUVrzw9N7CQ3pvDauTQ&sig2=pIjofuY0idllFm2m9yY41w

Invention Secrecy is still Going Strong

edS2aelXi7I


http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1320/318/Insider:_Close_To_4000_Free_Energy_Patents_Denied.html

Pete
3rd November 2011, 22:56
is the key to just put it out there into the public domain and quit trying to make your fortune from it?

siggy
3rd November 2011, 23:34
is the key to just put it out there into the public domain and quit trying to make your fortune from it?

I agree totally.
The problem is in trying to make money from the invention(s).
Surely with free energy devices there'd be no need for money! And there in lies the rub :)

Ilie Pandia
4th November 2011, 05:25
This statement is true but incomplete:

"A hidden purpose of this committee is to also screen energy-related patents which could threaten the power and fossil fuel companies."

The threat of Free Energy includes the demise of power and fossil fuel companies, but is much much bigger than that! This is not about the money. Money is created out of thin air anyway.

This is about "power over" and control. Free energy would radically change life on earth. The advent of free energy can easily qualify as "The EVENT" in our species evolution, this is how big its impact is. And this the reason why it's been tightly suppressed for about 200 years now (see Nikola Tesla).

VaughnB
4th November 2011, 15:26
I certainly believe there's been coverups, my question is that humans are very creative and the best kept secrets are the most fleeting of all.
Over the decades of all the brilliant minds across this planet, has not something come to fruition say from Japan, India, Russia, South America and so on. I don't think the U.S. has a monopoly on genius.

Just a thought.

Pete
4th November 2011, 15:28
I understand your point, but if you try to use a government office and legislation to protect your interests you are basically accepting their terms.
surely if the blueprints of how to develop free energy technology are simply made available via the net, who can control that?
Its a bit like the nonsense with accepting corporate law (gold fringe on federal flags) in the United States and Canada and if you choose to recognise their authority over you then you are giving them your permission to accept their ruling.

Carmody
4th November 2011, 15:56
The only thing that the person applying for a patent is doing, is attempting to get official government recognition of their effort, in order to protect themselves in court, concerning 'violation' of their 'rights' concerning said patent.

The person who is applying can go public, IIRC, anytime they want.

I can imagine that the number is that high. I have no problem believing the number is over 3000 patent application are 'blacked out'.

These things are INCREDIBLY EASY to understand and incredibly easy to implement. which is why the number is so high, at over 3000 applicants.

I'll show you. This item here... is half way there. What I'm saying, is the even as they operate by their 'enforced rules of physics' (the one's that went wrong as they edited maxwell's electromagnetic theories into pointing in the wrong direction) they keep banging their heads on it. Time and time again:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-physicists-room-temperature-quantum-bits.html

Physicists identify room temperature quantum bits in silicon carbide - widely used semiconductor

The research team discovered that silicon carbide contains crystal imperfections that can be controlled at a quantum mechanical level. The finding is published this week in the journal Nature.

The research group of David Awschalom, senior author, made the finding. Awschalom is director of UCSB's Center for Spintronics & Quantum Computation, professor of physics, electrical and computer engineering, and the Peter J. Clarke Director of the California NanoSystems Institute.

In conventional semiconductor-based electronic devices, crystal defects are often deemed undesirable because of their tendency to immobilize electrons by "trapping" them at a particular crystal location. However, the UCSB team discovered that electrons that become trapped by certain imperfections in silicon carbide do so in a way that allows their quantum states to be initialized, precisely manipulated, and measured using a combination of light and microwave radiation. This means that each of these defects meets the requirements for use as a quantum bit, or "qubit," which is often described as the quantum mechanical analog of a transistor, since it is the basic unit of a quantum computer.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What they are saying is that the 'semiconductor' has defects that are quantum and essentially....superconductive and dimensionally responsive.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Further in the same article:

While defects in silicon carbide may offer many technologically attractive qualities, an immense number of defects in other semiconductors are still left to be explored.

"Our dream is to make quantum mechanics fully engineerable," said William Koehl, lead author and a graduate student in the Awschalom lab. "Much like a civil engineer is able to design a bridge based on factors such as load capacity and length span, we'd like to see a day when there are quantum engineers who can design a quantum electronic device based on specifications such as degree of quantum entanglement and quality of interaction with the surrounding environment."


Dream to make it fully engineerable.. Humph!

Joseph Farrell explains in his books exactly how German scientists where doing finished engineered works during the second world war, and even before.

And on and on.