PDA

View Full Version : "Exploding Middle East Myths" written by Greg Felton-Epilogue-10-31-2011



ktlight
4th November 2011, 10:29
"In this edition of the show we discuss the book: Exploding Middle East Myths, written by Greg Felton.

For nearly 63 years, since its creation in 1948, the state of Israel has carefully controlled what the Western world knows about the Zionist state.

As a result, what we have received from the mainstream media is reams of propaganda and little truth when it comes to the racist and bellicose state.

Against this backdrop of censored "news," one gutsy journalist took a dangerous stand and instead has been telling the truth about Israel for the last 15 years.

In Exploding Middle East Myths, you'll see the real Israel: brutal treatment of Palestinians, blatant disregard for Christians and Muslims, and parasitic control over foreign governments, especially the US."

jsT3YrAEIeE

Lord Sidious
19th November 2011, 10:23
This video is very interesting.
Just watching it now and let me tell you, Gilad Atzmon keeps rising in my estimation, the more I hear from him.
I just heard him mention ''sayanim'' and most people have never heard of this.
I would suggest that anyone interested in middle eastern politics/history give this video a look.
Thanks for posting this KT.

Aryslan
19th November 2011, 12:20
I shall have a look! (This has nothing to do with Jedi mind tricks.)

Edit: That was pretty good. It is important to discuss such issues while we still can. I'd be interested to see how the author portrays the Palestinian (Muslim?) people. Would either of you consider someone that is anti-Zionist to be anti-Isreali? Apologies, I'm new to this area of politics.

Great show, as well. I look forward to watching more of them.

ktlight
19th November 2011, 13:07
Arysian,
Would either of you consider someone that is anti-Zionist to be anti-Isreali? Apologies, I'm new to this area of politics.

Zionism is a Rothschild development. Rothschild owns and funds Israel. So, maybe we could be seen as anti-Israel but definitely not anti-Israeli. In Israel there are the poor, as in USA or UK etc., who are fighting for their rights deprived to them by the Zionists who run Israel.

Aryslan
19th November 2011, 13:19
Understood, thanks kt. I've been aware of the group for a number of years, however, I have not gone beyond the knowledge that they are international bankers, and (probably) those who run Hollywood.

I'd like to mention another thought I had, on one of the more controversial issues if I may. The American eugenics movement is not that far removed from the Nazi campaign of the same sort. Is it truly that far of a leap to propose that those that control the Jewish state did the same?

Lord Sidious
19th November 2011, 13:29
Understood, thanks kt. I've been aware of the group for a number of years, however, I have not gone beyond the knowledge that they are international bankers, and (probably) those who run Hollywood.

I'd like to mention another thought I had, on one of the more controversial issues if I may. The American eugenics movement is not that far removed from the Nazi campaign of the same sort. Is it truly that far of a leap to propose that those that control the Jewish state did the same?

Some people say that the Nurnberg laws of the Reich are very similar to those in Israel right now.

PathWalker
19th November 2011, 17:19
The claim that the Zionists rule is as valid as the Arabs rule.
We can twist and stitch the facts to validate your view.
Both are Semites, both suffer from xenophobia.
Both powerful and fearsome.

If you connect to your fears then you are ruled by them.

Ishtar
22nd November 2011, 19:55
These "Jews" who rule the world are not originally of the race or religion of the Jews. They were of the race of the Khazars, semi-nomadic Turkic pastoralists that, in the 8th century, for reasons best known to themselves, exchanged their indigenous shamanism for Judaism.

Since the time of Oliver Cromwell in the UK, the British government and the monarchy has been 'in hock' to the Khazars, who always operate the same modus operandi,

1. Flood the economy of a country with credit
2. Gradually begin to hike up the interest rates
3. This creates bankruptcy, of people and governments, which
4. Goes on to create turmoil and chaos, so that in the end
5. The people rise up to demand a new world order and this allows…
6. The guys holding the purse strings to step out of the shadows with their ‘safe pair of hands’.

So what appears to be 'change' or 'revolution' is really nothing of the kind. They play both sides. They're really very good at it. Despite what we're taught in our history lessons, it’s not the ordinary people who cause revolutions… they are ‘led from behind’, as we saw from the travels of Hillary Clinton earlier in the year, through the Middle East and north Africa, ahead of the so-called Arab Spring.

I was quite amused when watching the storming of Gadaffi’s stronghold in Tripoli on the BBC News to hear an Evening Standard reporter, who obviously hadn’t been briefed, saying how the British SAS and Qatar special forces had led the raid. The interview with him was quickly terminated and no mention of it was ever made again.

Occupy Wall Street, I'm afraid, is no different, George Soros, the "Man Who Broke The Bank of England" on Black Wednesday, is backing the Occupy Wall Street crowd. It's no grass roots revolution taking place. They can't even formulate a decent set of demands.

In the same way, the Khazars were behind the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and the American Revolution.

And so who really is to 'blame' for Economic Armegeddon, the ones they make scapegoats, is also a big lie. This is always how the Khazars corrupt and bring down nations, and it was a deliberate policy to lend to people who could never pay back, otherwise known as the ‘sub-prime mortgages scandal’.

But what’s making the economies of whole countries spin out of control has been achieved by the deliberate policy of the Khazars of lending to whole governments. Then by hiking up the interest rates, governments and the countries they govern are brought to their knees, so that the money lenders can move their own men into positions of power. That’s why Goldman Sachs people are now in key positions in the White House, and why unelected Eurobank technocrat placemen have just been moved into position in countries like Greece (the cradle of democracy) Italy and now Spain. In Greece, Papandreou bravely tried to call a referendum, to help his people get themselves out of this stranglehold. But he was quickly and very heavily leant on. These countries were set up to fail, in other words, and it will be our turn next for an unelected placeman to replace David Cameron et al… unless he dances to the piper’s tune.

We saw a glaring example of how they have a grip round the throats of the UK government only recently when Chancellor George Osbourne oversaw the printing of £75 billion (known as ‘quantative easing’) and then handed the whole wadge over to prop up the Khazars' banks, rather than putting it into the economy to service growth.

None of this money, though, is real. In the so-called developed nations like those in the Europe and the US, we have been playing with funny money (known as ‘fiat currency’) for some time. Fiat currency has a notional value… in other words, its value is what people decide that it is. In contradistinction, many other nations still have currencies which are backed with gold, and so they’re not so keen to take our funny money or to back it as an investment.

Fiat money is just really numbers on a computer screen which is why Ireland has decided not pay the UK back, and Iceland is headed in a similar direction.

The Khazars also own a heck of a lot of the maintream media. They even own our monarchies.

If anyone criticises the Khazars they immediately get accused of being anti-Semitic .... and visions of the Holocaust spring to mind. But I doubt many Khazars were gassed in the ovens of Auschwitz. My guess is that it was the real, innocent Jews that took the hit.

For that reason alone, I think we should call them by their original name of the Khazars, and give the decent Jews a break.

Lord Sidious
22nd November 2011, 20:09
Well, the khazars you speak of are useful idiots as the saying goes.
I am not interested so much in the bricks on the pyramid as I am the eye.
Deal with jehovah/enlil and all this ends now.
I would rather treat the cause than deal with the symptoms.
And how do you know that all the khazars are bad?
Allowing for the good/bad deal, that is.

Ishtar
22nd November 2011, 20:22
I spend a lot of time in communion with the Eye, Lord Sid, but that doesn't stop me from keeping an eye on what's going on.

I didn't say, and don't think that all Khazars are bad. My main point was to separate them in people's minds from the original Jews, because these people really do give the real Jews a bad name.

I also do think that the Khazars who have been rigging this game for centuries, at least, do regard most people as sheep and do think they have a natural right to control and manipulate them to feather their own nests... even to the point of justifying it by saying "well, they're just sheep. They need to be led". However, the tactics that have been used over centuries are what have created this sheep-like state among the general populace and never have they/we been so dumbed down and medicated against perceiving our true state, and they/we are deliberately disempowered at every turn from ever being able to claim the power of being able to commune with spirits in our own right.

Part of my work is to help people reclaim that power and that natural intelligence again, so that they can recover their lives from their current slavery, and I'm proud to do that work.

My heart breaks for the old people of Greece and Italy (and probably Spain now) who are going to have to continue to work into nearly their 70s in order to pay off debts that were deliberately foisted on them, and are illusory debts anyway. That generation have worked hard all their lives, and there will be no or very little pension for them at the end of it. They will probably die in paupers' graves.

Being aware of the Godhead does not negate knowing the difference between good and evil, because if it did, how could we ever be of help to others? And what would be the pont then of taking a human body in the first place? I've tried sitting cross-legged in an Indian ashram for a very long time, far away from all the troubles of the world.... but that wasn't, in the end, the path for me.

Lord Sidious
22nd November 2011, 20:31
The whole idea of ''fake jews'' is in itself a dead end street.
I know the story, probably far better than anyone else here and I consider it a waste of time now.
Every single group has people who are doing things that people call ''bad'' and they have the opposite side of the coin too.

Ishtar
22nd November 2011, 20:33
Well, we will have to agree to differ, Lord Sid, because my experience (which is probably about as long as yours :cool:) is showing me a different story.

Davidallany
22nd November 2011, 21:45
Jews are not the problem, Khazars or non Khazars. All people following the three Abrahamic religions have been used against each other. I think that humanity has already been through 3 world wars in our modern hisstory, the first one being the crusades, lasting for 200 years.

So the question is who is benefitting from these conflicts, a better question yet, who invented the Abrahamic religions and why?

zqK-RuntywY

Ishtar
22nd November 2011, 22:51
...who invented the Abrahamic religions and why?

I don't think that's so much the problem. The Abrahamic religions were, originally, not much different to any collection of myths and rituals which underpinned a spiritual way of life. I think the question should be "Who literalised these mythological stories and turned metaphorical and symbolic characters into angels and demons? In other words, who politicised the spiritual for their own ends?"

In the Jewish religion, it was, I believe, King Tobias. In the Vedic religion, it was Zoroaster. In Tibetan Bon shamanism, it was Buddhism. To the Druid lore, it was the Romans.

I think we should also ask: "Who destroyed the Mystery religions and the Library of Alexandria which housed all the wisdom? Who developed a patriarchal monotheistic system out of one where male gods and female goddessess (spirits) were recognised as equals? Who destroyed the people's ability to contact their own spirits (gods) by pretending to act as middlemen for the cost of an indulgence? Who destroyed the ability to see spirit in everything by creating the new religion of science which dictated that matter was inaminate and governed by clockwork process which made life itself meaningless?"

That's my view, anyway.