Vaccines

[Phoenix]

Hi All,

I'll be visiting Rwanda soon for the first time and I'm wondering if I should take the recommended shots and pills for malaria and such.

After understanding the devastating and toxic effects of vaccines, I had decided awhile ago to never take a shot again... Anybody have some insight on this?

The main two are:

Malaria pills
Yellow fever shot

phoenix

[karelia]

If you value your health, stay away from vaccines. They are designed to do things: cause misery, which is the energy dark forces require to feed off like we do food, and they depopulate.

Follow common-sense rules, such as drink only purified/boiled water, peel fruit if you eat it raw, and make sure your veggies/meats are properly cooked. Take vitamin C with you and have it daily. Not all areas are malaria-prone, so find out if the area you go to is affected at all, and if it is, wear long sleeves and don't go outside during dusk.

[ThePythonicCow]

MMS seems to be quite affective against malaria - I'd have some of that with me if I were going to a region with malaria, and be familiar with how to use it.

Like karelia, I too am convinced that one should avoid vaccines.

[Flash]

As for vaccines, you decide what is best. As for malaria, it has gotten extremely bad and dangerous over many areas. The malaria pills could be efficient in most African countries, although MMS might be as well (and neither are vaccines). Make sure you have pills or water purifiers. Do not trust the water at any time re: yellow fever and dysenteria. Do not trust greens washed in water either. Consume only cooked food.

One friend of mine who has worked extensively in different African countries used to carry with him a bottle of Gin or pure vodka. Whenever he was eating something not too sure of, by respect for the offering for example, he would immediately drink two onces of 94% alcool. He told me he never got sick with any disease in food. He was eating cooked food only. He was only on the verge of alcoolism - lol (this is a joke)

However, he was dutifully taking his malaria pills. And, alcool does not kill amoebas and other heavy stuff in water, so he would disinfect his water all the time, even the water used to wash green vegetables.

Have a good trip, Africa is really something to see.

[Dawn]

I agree with Paul, Take MMS with you and use it to disinfect your water, your bath (if you feel it is needed) and your innards. Wouldn't travel without it!

[Phoenix]

MMS seems to be quite affective against malaria - I'd have some of that with me if I were going to a region with malaria, and be familiar with how to use it.

Like karelia, I too am convinced that one should avoid vaccines.

What's MMS? Thanks! :)

[Siberia9]

If my memory is correct MMS was developed for malaria in the first place. I would rather face any illness head on than to take part in the vaccine lie myself. I PROMISE YOU, vaccines are part of the program to cause suffering and death. The information is everywhere on that, and Ive had members of the Illuminati tell me that right to my face, I cant make it any clearer than that friend.

[Phoenix]

As for vaccines, you decide what is best. As for malaria, it has gotten extremely bad and dangerous over many areas. The malaria pills could be efficient in most African countries, although MMS might be as well (and neither are vaccines). Make sure you have pills or water purifiers. Do not trust the water at any time re: yellow fever and dysenteria. Do not trust greens washed in water either. Consume only cooked food.

One friend of mine who has worked extensively in different African countries used to carry with him a bottle of Gin or pure vodka. Whenever he was eating something not too sure of, by respect for the offering for example, he would immediately drink two onces of 94% alcool. He told me he never got sick with any disease in food. He was eating cooked food only. He was only on the verge of alcoolism - lol (this is a joke)

However, he was dutifully taking his malaria pills. And, alcool does not kill amoebas and other heavy stuff in water, so he would disinfect his water all the time, even the water used to wash green vegetables.

Have a good trip, Africa is really something to see.

Hi Flash,

Thanks so much for your input! The alcohol idea sounds great, I'm going to look into that :)

phoenix

¤=[Post Update]=¤


If my memory is correct MMS was developed for malaria in the first place. I would rather face any illness head on than to take part in the vaccine lie myself. I PROMISE YOU, vaccines are part of the program to cause suffering and death. The information is everywhere on that, and Ive had members of the Illuminati tell me that right to my face, I cant make it any clearer than that friend.

Siberia9,

I'm right there with you, I agree. Thanks for your input.

phoenix

[Siberia9]

If you google MMS there's tons of info on it. You can buy kits on Ebay for less than $20.00 US, just make sure it has the citric acid solution with it. I also bought some in powder form to take on the plane in my lugage.

[Jean-Marie]

If the area has alot of flies, or mosquitoes you may want to buy a bottle of REI's Jungle Juice. It is the best stuff for keeping the bugs away. I spray it on my clothing, especially shoes, socks, end of pant, not on skin directly. Bugs like flies and mosquitoes transmit disease!

http://www.rei.com/product/799528/sawyer-jungle-juice-100-pump-spray-insect-repellent-2-fl-oz

[RMorgan]

Well, there´s no proper vaccine against malaria yet developed.

You shouldn´t worry about Malaria only. There´s also the Dengue-Fever which is terrible and the Yellow Fever, which is even more terrible.

I took the shots for the Yellow Fever about 2 times and I don´t regret it. In my opinion, I think it´s better to take the risk with the vaccine than to get this terrible disease, which you will carry for life.

I live in South-East Brazil and I´ve been to Brazilian Amazon (North) several times. There´s a couple of things I´ve learned about how to prevent those nasty mosquitoes from biting you.

- Don´t go out on sunset. Those mosquitoes get very agitated between 17:00 and 19:00.
- Protect your legs. Most part of those dangerous mosquitoes are low fliers and will bite you on the legs.
- If you don´t have a proper repellent, kitchen oil can be very good to repel these mosquitoes. Use it on your skin if things get really nasty. It´s disgusting but it works.
- Always check your beds for spiders and other insects before sleeping. ALWAYS do that.
- Always use a mosquito protection net around and over your bed. They are like a hardware firewall for mosquito protection. ;)
- If you go to very remote places, don´t drink any water without purifying with peroxide hydrogen or by boiling it. Try to go always with bottled water.
- Always check your shoes before wearing them. Scorpions and spiders love to hide inside shoes.
- Stay away from exotic local alcoholic drinks. They might be contaminated with methanol, which will poison you.
- Be careful with what you eat. Some local foods and spices might not go well with your delicate stomach.
- Stay away from barber bugs as well. They might transmit Chagas desease and other terrible diseases.

Well, that´s all I can remember for now.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Siberia9]

Yes you wouldn't want a disease you carry for life thats for sure, LOL. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udTmlhQaIeg

[WhiteFeather]

Definately Stay away from any Vaccines, i wish i had never taken any. MMS i hear is great to have on hand as well. A member from this forum sent me this link on water drops too, have a gander at this as well. http://www.herbalremedies.com/h20stable.html?utm_source=frg&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=product&zmam=1000941&zmas=32&zmac=283&zmap=194938 Stay safe and healthy on your journey.

[Phoenix]

If you google MMS there's tons of info on it. You can buy kits on Ebay for less than $20.00 US, just make sure it has the citric acid solution with it. I also bought some in powder form to take on the plane in my lugage.

Sounds good. I figured you had a specific kind of MMS that you use, because I'm never sure where to find a good alternative medicine, it seems like there could be a lot of websites selling fake stuff, ya know? Any links?

And what do you think about using the juice from a lemon or orange, lots of citric acid in there.. do you think it's wiser to use the pure stuff?

Thanks a million!
phoenix

[onawah]

If you still think there might be benefits to any kind of vaccine, I strongly suggest you watch Lethal Injection
UioC6ARoLEM

[Siberia9]

If you google MMS there's tons of info on it. You can buy kits on Ebay for less than $20.00 US, just make sure it has the citric acid solution with it. I also bought some in powder form to take on the plane in my lugage.

Sounds good. I figured you had a specific kind of MMS that you use, because I'm never sure where to find a good alternative medicine, it seems like there could be a lot of websites selling fake stuff, ya know? Any links?

And what do you think about using the juice from a lemon or orange, lots of citric acid in there.. do you think it's wiser to use the pure stuff?

Thanks a million!
phoenix

The citric acid that comes in the kit from ebay is mixed at 50/50 where as lemon juice is not as concentrated and requires more, and less acurate mixing. The idea is to create a chemical reaction and a new more powerful chemical etc.There are some videos on all this if you google mms or go to youtube you can find MORE than you can stand to watch, its pretty simple to get a handle on.

[Phoenix]

Thanks everyone,

The only problem is that the country requires a proof of vaccination of Yellow Fever. Anybody have experience getting around this?

phoenix

[Sync]

Thanks everyone,

The only problem is that the country requires a proof of vaccination of Yellow Fever. Anybody have experience getting around this?

phoenix

You can't unless:

You are a diplomat.
You are in the military.
You forge a doctor's note... try bribing your doc.

Or you could just get the vaccine... you'll be fine.

The vaccine scare is a red-herring; the nanotech is already in all of us... it's partially airborn.

Vaccine serum can be analyzed by anyone; therefore it is not tampered with on a macro batch scale... got to ensure that plausible deniability, right? Can't do that with a vile full of nanomite adulterants.

Just saying...

[Daughter of Time]

I've known several people who've spent time in Rwanda. Most of them were vaccinated. Because they were young and strong, they suffered no adverse effects. However, if I were to go on about the adverse effects of vaccines that some people i know have suffered, I'd be writing for the next few hours, and I don't want to do that. I am diametrically opposed to the opinion that the vaccine scare is a red-herring! That is very misguided information!

Unfortunately, I have no advice about how to get away with "prooff of vaccination" if you haven't been vaccinated. But the advice on MMS is very good. Take the malaria pills with you so that you have them if you should need them. Another thing which also works very well is hydrogen peroxide - food grade - 35%. But it's advisable to start taking either the MMS or the HP before you leave, so that your system rids itself of bacteria and viruses before you go, this way it stands a better chance to fighting whatever invaders you might run into.

[Siberia9]

Thanks everyone,

The only problem is that the country requires a proof of vaccination of Yellow Fever. Anybody have experience getting around this?

phoenix

You can bribe Drs in Mexico easly for this, and in most other poor countrys as well, have a local set it up for you. Or you could use the same Dr's that the elite use, they sure as hell dont get any vaccines, they know better.

[lilac]

I travelled to India several times in the 80s. On the first trip, I dutifully took the malaria pills that the doctor told me were mandatory. As it turned out, they were just quinine, easy and cheap to get in India. Once I made a few friends travelling, I learned that quinine is just as effective if taken when you contract the disease (god forbid). It was a bummer because the quinine made my hair fall out and I didn't realize what was doing it for the longest time. But these days I would definitely have my trustie MMS kit, along with a pocket water purifier. In my first aid kit, I would have the basic 12 homeopathic remedies. Arnica for bruises or shock. While there I burned my leg on the motorcycle exhaust pipe. It got badly infected pretty quick in that climate. I would have been better off to put golden seal powder on the wound to keep it dry and disinfected. Psyllium seed husk is handy to have along. Mix with fruit juice for constipation. For diarrhea, mix with yogurt. Not sure about yellow fever - that's a tough call. My daughter is 27 and has never had a vaccination. last year she went back to our little spot in India and she did fine.

[Phoenix]

okay, so I dug a little deeper, and found the following:

"The World Health Organization grants American visitors and tourists the right to refuse shots when traveling internationally. You simply declare exemption under Clause 83 of the International Sanitary Code, issued by WHO and adopted by all its members."

"Exceptions built into Clause 83: (1) If you come from an infected area, vaccinations are necessary OR you might be quarantined (detained in one place) for up to 14 days from the time you left the infected area IF the health department of the nation you arrive in thinks it necessary. If you come from an area where there has been an epidemic, you will probably be put under surveillance. This means that, together with the local health department, you must keep watch for suspicious signs or symptoms. You will probably be required to report periodically to the local health officer for a period up to 14 days, from the time of your departure from the infected area. If symptoms occur, you must immediately turn yourself in and submit to quarantine or isolation. (2) If an area you wish to enter is infected, you may be detained until the public health official permits you to continue on."

I should have no problem with either of these because I'm coming from the US.

"Every year thousands travel abroad without taking vaccinations, and with little or no inconvenience. They simply sign a waiver before they start their overseas travel. When you receive your passport, request a copy of Foreign Rules and Regulations, Part 71, Title 42, on immunizations. That is the sheet that spells out your right to not be inoculated in your travels. Keep a copy in the bottom of your suitcase."

Source: http://vaccinationcrisis.com/avoiding.html

I already have my passport, so I'm trying to find this sheet the above speaks of. So then I dug for the aforementioned code, and this is what I found (not sure if this is correct):

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title42/42cfr71_main_02.tpl

But I can't find any form or document.

me = currently stumped :confused:

phoenix

¤=[Post Update]=¤


I travelled to India several times in the 80s. On the first trip, I dutifully took the malaria pills that the doctor told me were mandatory. As it turned out, they were just quinine, easy and cheap to get in India. Once I made a few friends travelling, I learned that quinine is just as effective if taken when you contract the disease (god forbid). It was a bummer because the quinine made my hair fall out and I didn't realize what was doing it for the longest time. But these days I would definitely have my trustie MMS kit, along with a pocket water purifier. In my first aid kit, I would have the basic 12 homeopathic remedies. Arnica for bruises or shock. While there I burned my leg on the motorcycle exhaust pipe. It got badly infected pretty quick in that climate. I would have been better off to put golden seal powder on the wound to keep it dry and disinfected. Psyllium seed husk is handy to have along. Mix with fruit juice for constipation. For diarrhea, mix with yogurt. Not sure about yellow fever - that's a tough call. My daughter is 27 and has never had a vaccination. last year she went back to our little spot in India and she did fine.

Hi lilac, thanks so much for your insight. I don't know anything about homeopathic remedies. I don't know where to look. May your offer any information I can read up and study about these 12 basic remedies? I'd be eternally grateful.

phoenix

[mahalall]

An element of the vaccine debate which seems to be over seen is, ADEM.

Acute disseminating encephalomyelitis (ADEM)

It is a neurological condition through which lesions develop in the brain thus causing paraplegia. (not very nice as 50% don't recover).

1) Vaccines can cause ADEM, probability is: 0.4 of 8 in 1000000 so very thankfully very rare
however

2) 1:3000 children with measles develop ADEM


http://www.adem.org/
http://www.cafamily.org.uk/Direct/a17.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_disseminated_encephalomyelitis

Vaccination is for one to make an individual assessment, and then to make an informed decision with the best of knowledge available.

[Tangri]

Definately Stay away from any Vaccines, i wish i had never taken any. MMS i hear is great to have on hand as well. A member from this forum sent me this link on water drops too, have a gander at this as well. http://www.herbalremedies.com/h20stable.html?utm_source=frg&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=product&zmam=1000941&zmas=32&zmac=283&zmap=194938 Stay safe and healthy on your journey.

I remember a debate back to my past, I had a think tank meeting at an Anatolia City; One of blue collar academics success ted that vaccines boosted global population against natural selection. Since then, I am little skeptical when I hear something related with natural selection support.

[Siberia9]

This may be of some use on the clause 83 exemption.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm

[Phoenix]

This may be of some use on the clause 83 exemption.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm

I saw this, it doesn't seem to really carry any weight though. Both claims in my previous post seem to have lead me to dead ends.. hmm..

phoenix

[Siberia9]

This may be of some use on the clause 83 exemption.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm

I saw this, it doesn't seem to really carry any weight though. Both claims in my previous post seem to have lead me to dead ends.. hmm..

phoenix

I gotta disagree with you there, they have dedicated allot of stuf there to your subject. Its probably the best your going to do without buying the documents saying you have just had the vaccine.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm#yellowfever

[TargeT]

I've never had a vaccine in my life 'n been to Mexico, Belize, Guatemala & Honduras (which I assume is a region prone to milaria) as well as all over the middle east.


I do test positive for TB now, (though I've never had it) but other than that no issues :)



the way I accomplished this was through manipulation, lies & decite... (aka used their own F'n tools against 'em) applied as needed per situation. If anyone asks I am alergic to eggs (most vaccines are cultured in eggs) and have severe eczema issues; & "the last time I had a shot my chest got really tight and I had trouble breathing"

say those three things together and most needle wielders will run away from you in fear...

[Phoenix]

I've never had a vaccine in my life 'n been to Mexico, Belize, Guatemala & Honduras (which I assume is a region prone to milaria) as well as all over the middle east.


I do test positive for TB now, (though I've never had it) but other than that no issues :)



the way I accomplished this was through manipulation, lies & decite... (aka used their own F'n tools against 'em) applied as needed per situation. If anyone asks I am alergic to eggs (most vaccines are cultured in eggs) and have severe eczema issues; & "the last time I had a shot my chest got really tight and I had trouble breathing"

say those three things together and most needle wielders will run away from you in fear...

Hey target, good stuff. I also test positive for tb, though I've never had it.

But, I'm excited to find someone who has used the "I'm allergic to eggs" and other stuff similar. Can you just say that to the border control people, or did u say that to the doc at home and they handed you a waiver?

I'm asking because, I'm worried that if I say I'm allergic to eggs, the doc will do a scratch test or something and reveal I'm not.

Any thoughts?

[Phoenix]

This may be of some use on the clause 83 exemption.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm

I saw this, it doesn't seem to really carry any weight though. Both claims in my previous post seem to have lead me to dead ends.. hmm..

phoenix

I gotta disagree with you there, they have dedicated allot of stuf there to your subject. Its probably the best your going to do without buying the documents saying you have just had the vaccine.
http://www.vaclib.org/legal/immigration.htm#yellowfever

I sorry, i wasn't thorough. I meant that, this website doesn't go into enough detail to explain clause 83. I've tried to find the exact words of clause 83, but I can't find anything close to "the WHO grants all American travelers who are coming from a non-malaria destination exemption from vaccination if they choose so."

All I can find is claims that "people travel all the time without getting vaccinated and whatnot" but I am really looking for cold hard evidence that I can recite at border patrol and say "look, according to rule xyz in the abc handbook, shown here, I am exempt from vaccinations."

I'm not sure if that option is a feasible one at this point. I think Im going to look into the "I'm allergic to eggs and stuff route" at this point..

[TargeT]

I'm asking because, I'm worried that if I say I'm allergic to eggs, the doc will do a scratch test or something and reveal I'm not.

Any thoughts?

it works well but is situational; yes a doc could want a scratch test to verify; but generaly they will wan't to send you to a specialist for that & you could use time frame as an excuse "but doc, I leave two days from now!" or something...

I try to build a healthy vaccine avoidance tool kit and use the appropriate tool at the right time ;)

Social engineering is my most used tool.

[onawah]

Great new article and video about the dangers of vaccines
Suzanne Humphries on Vaccines

efto1LpWkKw

Uploaded by GaryNullTV on Dec 13, 2011

Dr Suzanne Humphries, a practicing nephrologist (kidney physician) says the vaccine industry isn't giving people both sides of the story, and parents need to get informed before subjecting their children to vaccines that can potentially cause serious harm or even death.


Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS - DEADLY INJECTION: THE HIDDEN INGREDIENTS

DEADLY INJECTION: THE HIDDEN INGREDIENTS IN VACCINES

By Gary Null, PhD and Nancy Ashley, VMD, MS
For more than 100 years, Americans have lined up to take their vaccines. We have never questioned the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, and why should we? Vaccines are backed by the full faith and confidence of the entire scientific community, including the FDA, the CDC, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, and virtually all of the esteemed medical journals, including the British Medical Journal, the Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association, have given their unconditional support to vaccines. Therefore, in fact, if any physician, scientist, journalist, or health activist ever challenges either the safety or efficacy of vaccines, they are immediately assaulted. The normal arguments are:

There are dozens of gold standard studies proving beyond a shadow of a doubt the safety and efficacy of every vaccine and every combination of vaccines.
There is an independent group of scientists at the FDA and the CDC that examines the childhood vaccine schedule to make sure it is appropriate.
There is no scientific proof that vaccines are dangerous.
On rare occasions, when someone does have an adverse reaction, it in no way affects the safety and efficacy for anyone else.
Virtually all major scourges -- polio, smallpox, and measles -- were eliminated by our vaccine program.


Well, I’m persuaded. But there is one little point – what if there is evidence that can prove that vaccines are neither safe nor effective for a given individual? For example, let’s examine the ingredients. Analyzing the data from the finest peer-reviewed studies, are the ingredients non-toxic, non-allergic, non-stressing to the body’s immune system?
Oops! It seems we have a problem, Scotty.

A recent story in the Salem News should have made headlines across the country.1 The reporter describes in detail how vaccines are contaminated with dangerous ingredients -- including cancer, viruses, and bacteria -- which translate into the creation of lifelong patients for the pharmaceutical industry. He cites statistics showing that the lifespan of Americans is decreasing in direct relationship to the increase of vaccines. Can it be true that all the vaccines are contaminated and always have been? How did this get covered up? Who was involved? Scientists, regulatory agencies, members of Congress in oversight positions, all were complicit in the conspiracy of silence and denial of accountability. But you won’t find this story in the New York Times or any of the major media. It won’t make a difference what this reporter said. It won’t lead to health journalists advocating a change in vaccine policies. We won’t have physicians and nurses changing their minds about the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Why? Because they are all part of the official story. They are part of the cult, with the cult-like mind set of true believers. And they must keep protecting the official story at all costs. This is not the way public health policies should be administered.
So at a time of year when vaccines are being pushed upon us from all sides, let’s take a look at what is really in vaccines and how it got there.

THE HISTORY OF VACCINE CONTAMINATION
The common perception that vaccines are a safe, clean product is far removed from reality. The early vaccinologists used technology which was in its infancy, created as they went along with very little thought for the consequences. How did they go about making vaccines in the first place? They started with virus samples, which they obtained primitively from actual cases of disease: polio virus came from a suspension of ground up backbone from a deceased polio victim, measles virus was obtained from a throat culture from a sick 11 year-old boy, mumps virus (the Jeryl Lynn strain) was taken from a throat culture from the daughter of famed vaccine developer, Maurice Hilleman2, the hepatitis B vaccine was derived from infected human blood3, and so on. Of course, since all virus samples for vaccine manufacture were obtained from real life situations, they came with their own bacteria, viruses, and contaminants which were not sterilized away. It might be surprising for most people to learn that vaccines today are still based in these same primitive virus cultures.
Next, in order to produce vaccines for distribution it is necessary to have a large quantity of virus. Since viruses can only grow in a living medium, how could they propagate the viruses? Vaccines were developed by injecting live animals with viruses and then killing them to obtain enough infected tissue to grow large quantities of the virus. In the case of polio, it was the rhesus and African green monkeys that were used. As techniques improved, organs or cells of animals, as well as human tissue, were used, and we currently have vaccines propagated in chick fibroblast cells, chick embryos, chick retinal cells, monkey kidney cells, aborted human fetal lung fibroblast cells, chick kidney cells, mouse brain culture, rhesus fetal lung tissue culture, and sheep red blood cells, to name a few.4 Possibly the most bizarre substrate choice is the recently- approved Cervarix human papillomavirus vaccine by GlaxoSmithKline, which grows the virus in insect cells (Trichoplusia ni, the Cabbage Looper – a member of the moth family).5

Live-attenuated vaccines add yet more animal products to the mix by a process known as passaging.6 In order to reduce the virulence of a virus so that it won’t immediately sicken the vaccine recipient, it is “passaged” by injecting the virus into a series of animals or animal cells – sometimes more than one type -- collecting fluid after the cell or animal appears infected, and repeating the process again and again into more subjects until the virulence is reduced. The consequence, of course, is that with each passage, more foreign cells, proteins, viruses, bacteria, and fragments of DNA are taken from their animal sources and end up in the vaccine.

Once scientists have obtained the virus they deem acceptable, this becomes the seed virus. It is then nurtured with a variety of nutrients, including fetal calf serum, bovine extract, yeast, bovine serum albumin, and human serum albumin. Another animal-based product, porcine trypsin, is used earlier in the process to break down the virus to facilitate viral infection in tissue7.

But surely after they have obtained enough virus to make a vaccine, they purify the end product and filter all of this animal tissue out? Actually, no. There are many obstacles to any successful purification process: they can’t risk destroying the virus they need for the vaccine, and they also can’t filter out anything smaller than the virus itself.8 The result is that our vaccines are crude, unpurified products which cannot be separated from the debris of the cells on which they are grown. The limited tests for contaminants can identify some of the known pathogens, but mostly ignore the vast host of unknown, unstudied small particles and chemicals. How can they even evaluate unwanted viruses in vaccines or even know for sure what is there? The gold standard test to date is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which can detect small DNA fragments. The inherent problem, however, is that there has to be a known DNA segment that is unique to a certain pathogen in order for PCR to successfully identify it. PCR therefore could never be used to prove a vaccine to be pure because it cannot identify an unknown virus or contaminant. In many cases, safety or purity of a vaccine is tested by injecting it into animals and evaluating them for infection or tumor formation – a cumbersome, time-consuming, and ultimately unreliable method. As we have seen repeatedly, manufacturers tend to look for a problem only after people are sickened by vaccines. Behind closed doors, many scientists in the field have expressed deep concern about the state of our vaccines. But even the Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research (CBER), which is the arm of the FDA responsible for monitoring vaccine safety, has stated that under current regulations they can only give recommendations to vaccine manufacturers. They have no control over how vaccines are made or what substrates or cells are used.9

We know that these potentially hazardous animal products are used intentionally by the manufacturers and are a part of vaccines. So let’s talk about what has been found in vaccines that wasn’t intended to be there.

ADVENTITIOUS AGENTS
Adventitious agents are microorganisms that have been unintentionally introduced into the manufacturing process of a vaccine and cause contamination. They can be infectious, inflammatory, or tumorigenic, and there are numerous examples throughout vaccine history of contamination with unexpected pathogens.10

Viruses:
Early on it was discovered that using animals or embryos in primary cell cultures resulted in many unwanted viruses ending up in the vaccines. Simian Virus 40 (SV40), discovered in the manufacture of the polio vaccine, is perhaps the best known of these viruses. Because both the Salk and the Sabin vaccines exclusively used monkey kidneys to produce poliovirus, both vaccines were completely contaminated with SV40, which was given to millions of children in the 1950s and 1960s. According to Dr. Ben Sweet, a Merck researcher at the time, “when we started growing the vaccines, we just couldn’t get rid of the SV-40 contaminated virus. We tried to neutralize it, but couldn’t.” 11
Even the use of formaldehyde in the injectable (Salk) polio vaccine wasn’t able to kill it. SV40 is considered an oncogenic virus and it is actually used to induce cancer in the lab setting. The question is then: did widespread vaccination with SV40-contaminated vaccine in the 1950’s and 1960’s play a role in the exponential increase of cancer in the US? In fact, SV 40 has been isolated in many types of cancer, especially brain tumors, bone cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and malignant mesothelioma – a cancer usually associated with asbestos.12 Many researchers believe there is a connection. Although SV40 was ultimately eliminated from the polio vaccines, the other endogenous simian viruses present in monkey kidneys – along with their pathogenic potential -- have been completely ignored.

More recently, in 2010, both rotavirus vaccines were found to be contaminated with porcine circoviruses. Briefly withdrawing Rotarix by GlaxoSmithKine from the market for containing porcine circovirus 1 (PCV1), the FDA allowed it back in use after discovering that RotaTeq, the competing vaccine by Merck, contained both PCV1 and PCV2. Although PCV1 causes only mild disease in pigs, PCV2 causes a serious wasting disease in piglets which is usually fatal. Confronted with the only two rotavirus vaccines on the market both contaminated with circovirus, the FDA chose neither to investigate the potential hazard of this nor to stop giving the vaccine.13, 14 They instead threw up their hands and declared business as usual.

Reverse Transcriptase (RT):
Reverse transcriptase is an enzyme which allows DNA to be synthesized from an RNA template and be incorporated into a cell where it has not been previously, and is an integral factor in the function of retroviruses, such as HIV or the feline leukemia virus.15 In 1996, RT activity was discovered in the MMR vaccine, raising concerns that the vaccine had been contaminated with retroviruses which can cause both disease and initiation of cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) was responsible for investigating this potential safety hazard. Did they withdraw the vaccine? Did they warn the public about possible risks? No. Without telling the public, the WHO organized studies at certain laboratories which determined that the RT activity was associated with two endogenous avian retroviruses: EAV and ALV. The Avian Leukosis Virus (ALV) can cause cancer in birds, and theoretically could infect the cells of vaccine recipients via RT and cause cancer in them as well. The test methods were not very reassuring: investigators attempted to infect human cells with ALV for only 48 hours before proclaiming that no merger of virus and human DNA had been observed. There was also the possibility that avian virus RT could combine with the live measles virus to create new mutant viruses, which likewise “had not been observed.” Researchers from the WHO were unable to study longer term consequences of the RT fragments in the MMR because the measles virus itself killed the growing culture within 3 or 4 days. So ultimately, the WHO decided that because there was no clear evidence that any harm had occurred thus far, they would leave the MMR vaccine as it was and not require the manufacturers to use a substrate that was RT-free. Since then, endogenous avian vaccines have likewise been found in all the egg-based vaccines -- influenza, yellow fever, and smallpox.16 -- and there has been little investigation into the significance or possible harm.

Bacteria:
It is known that many types of bacteria contaminate vaccines during manufacture, but in most cases this does not come to the attention of the public. In 2007, Merck had to recall 1.2 million doses of PedvaxHIB and COMVAX vaccines (Haemophilus Influenza type B and combined Haemophilus Influenza type B and Hepatitis B) because of bacterial contamination with Bacillus cereus, a gram positive bacteria that frequently causes food poisoning.17

The mycoplasmas are a large class of bacteria and are frequent contaminants of primary and continuous cell lines that are used to make vaccines. While many are harmless, others can cause serious disease in humans, including respiratory ailments and chronic fatigue-like symptoms. Mycoplasma contamination is a serious enough problem that the industry group, Parenteral Drug Association, created a separate Mycoplasma Task Force. 18
The main source of mycoplasma infection for vaccine makers is cross contamination by infected cell culture used in the same laboratory.19

Mycoplasma also commonly infects chickens and eggs. While pathogen-free eggs are used to create vaccine virus seeds, the vaccines themselves are produced from commercial eggs.20 Even though the flocks are regularly tested for a variety of avian pathogens, they only test for the two most common types of mycoplasma, which cannot protect against the host of other mycoplasmas that are common in chickens and eggs. Testing is discretionary, and instead, regulation tends to emphasize rigorous “downstream” inactivation protocols, using formaldehyde and other toxic chemicals to kill the bacteria they know are present. 21

Cancer:
When the famous vaccinologist, Dr. Maurice Hillemann, created an adenovirus vaccine (for the military) from an intestinal cell line he believed to be from normal human tissue, he later found to his chagrin, after a few people had already received his vaccine, that the culture was completely contaminated with cervical cancer (HeLa cells). 22 The cancerous cells had invaded his previously normal cells simply from being in the same laboratory. Does this still happen today? You bet it does. Unfortunately, it seems impossible to completely prevent laboratory contamination from taking place.

Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy
Other pathogens potentially present in human vaccines and of great concern include transmissible agents of spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) from the use of bovine serum and albumin products, which could be contaminated with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).23 Now referred to as “transmissible” agents, the name change is an acknowledgment that these prions could be transferred to people through vaccines. In fact, such instances have occurred, as in England in 2001 when two children in England who had received the same polio vaccine went on to develop Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.24 Vaccine transmission through BSE had been suspected in Great Britain since the late 1980s, when many bovine herds became infected with the disease, but vaccines which could have been contaminated were not removed from the market until almost 10 years later. As frequently happens, those in charge made the decision not to withdraw vaccines initially -- not because there wasn’t a risk of catastrophic illness, but because “the risk to public health through loss of confidence in the vaccine program was greater than the remote theoretical risk associated with the use of bovine materials in vaccine.”25

Examples of transmission involving TSE have likewise been documented in veterinary medicine, such as in 1997 when a number of sheep and goats in Italy developed scrapie (a type of spongiform encephalopathy) after having been vaccinated against Mycoplasma agalactiae.26

So it is obvious that there are there many risks to injecting such a wide variety of animal cells into our bodies. Yet, not only has very little research has been done on this highly charged topic, but in fact, some scientists are pushing the envelope of the cautionary principle by intentionally combining human and animal cells with little regard for the consequences. An example of this is the RotaTeq rotavirus vaccine by Merck which came out in 2006. RotaTeq is a live, oral pentavalent vaccine that contains 5 live “reassortant” rotaviruses from human and bovine hosts, meaning that the viruses from humans and cows were taken apart and then combined to form a bovine-human hybrid.27 We know that this vaccine has caused many serious adverse events, including the increased risk of intussception,28 but we don’t know about the longer term potential for harm from combining cells from cows and people.

Autoimmune Disorders
Another significant potential for harm from the injection of animal, bacterial, and viral cells is that extended immunostimulation by the foreign antigen could provoke chronic inflammation or autoantibody production. DNA fragments can be incorporated into the host cell and can cause the production of protein molecules that can cause autoimmune reactions. Considering the exponential increase in autoimmune diseases over the past 25 years, it is certainly reasonable to suspect that the large amount of foreign proteins injected into our bodies through vaccination is playing havoc with the ability of our immune systems to function adequately. There are also instances of certain vaccines causing a specific autoimmune response, such as the suspected association is between the Haemophilus influenza B vaccine and type 1 diabetes, which has been on the increase following widespread use of this vaccine.29,30 Another example is the connection between the Hepatitis B vaccine and multiple sclerosis.31 Dr. Phillip Krause of the FDA chaired the committee that licensed the chickenpox vaccine, and was concerned at the time about the possible connection between the vaccine and subsequent autoimmune disease. But instead of calling for a serious scientific inquiry, the FDA asked Merck to look for evidence of an autoimmune response associated with the DNA that was included in that vaccine.32 Of course, Merck found no such association, and the matter was dropped.

Recombinant Vaccines
There are currently a few recombinant vaccines on the market: the human papillomavirus vaccine, Gardasil, and Hepatitis B vaccines, Recombivax and Engerix. Gardasil is prepared from virus-like particles of the four HPV types grown separately in yeast and then recombined.33 As we discovered just in September 2011, viral DNA has been found in Gardasil, with the possibility that the vaccine not only could cause infection with HPV, but viral DNA could be integrated into the recipient’s chromosomes and turn on cancer genes!34

CELL CULTURE TECHNOLOGY: WHERE ARE WE NOW?
In recent years vaccine manufacturers have been using newer technologies to make vaccines without the use of live animals or eggs (primary cells). Yeast is widely in use, as are two types of human diploid cells: MRC-5 and WI-38, which are lung fibroblasts cultured from two different aborted fetuses.35 Cell line vaccines still carry the original risk of contamination in the animal cells they were taken from, plus the chance of acquired contamination in laboratory conditions over the years that the cells have existed. Regarding human diploid cells, many people who have strong ethical objections to abortion no doubt would be shocked to learn that they are injecting cells grown on aborted fetuses into themselves and their children with every MMR, Hepatitis A, Chicken pox, and Herpes Zoster vaccine, or any vaccine combination that includes them.36

Immortalized Cells
The current emphasis is on cells that can grow indefinitely. The “immortalized” or “transformed” cell line -- in use through Vero cells created from African green monkey kidneys for the polio vaccine -- are cells which were normal but became transformed in the laboratory to live forever. These are not normal diploid cells: they have an abnormal number of chromosomes, will grow indefinitely in culture, but are known to form tumors after a certain number of passages used in vaccine manufacture. In other words, if these cells are used for too long, they will cause cancer. In Vero cells, for example, testing has showed that after 127 – 140 passages in agar, tumors will start to form.37 For vaccine manufacturers, the risk of causing cancer through vaccines is worth taking: the cells are easier to use than primary cells, less labor intensive, and the cost of production per vaccine is substantially reduced. But how does the vaccine recipient feel about taking this risk? So far, almost no one receiving the inactivated polio vaccine is aware of this information because there is no such thing as informed consent in the world of vaccines.

Residual DNA
Despite precautions in manufacturing vaccines, it is inevitable that animal DNA and culture-contaminating viruses will end up in the final vaccine. Primary cells and immortalized cells have been found to contain viral genomes and harbor latent viruses. Studies show that viral genomic DNA is at least as infectious and tumorigenic when incorporated into cell substrate as it when directly injected.38 Is there a risk that these stray proteins could be incorporated into the vaccine recipient’s own DNA resulting in abnormal gene transcription? Absolutely! Are there any safeguards against this? Not really. The WHO has set guidelines for the use of animal cells in cell line technology based vaccines, which limit the amount of cellular DNA to 10 nanograms per dose (up from 100 picograms per dose), but they acknowledge that manufacturers will have difficulty meeting this standard, and that they don’t have the authority to enforce it.39 And this guideline, by the way, is completely arbitrary. There is no scientific data to show that no harm will come to a vaccine recipient who only received 10 nanograms of foreign DNA. Furthermore, a child receiving 9 vaccines in one day would be getting at minimum of 90 nanograms of DNA injected directly into his body if they were all made using the cell line technology. Keep in mind, however, that the current vaccines made on primary cells have no recommended limit for residual DNA, so the situation is already dire.

Swiss pharmaceuticals giant, Novartis, recently completed a state of the art vaccine manufacturing plant on 400 acres in Holly Springs, North Carolina, largely funded by our tax dollars ($767 million from HHS), and with free land and tax abatements courtesy of the state of North Carolina. What do they intend to manufacture there? The plant was designed to use cell line technology to respond faster than is currently possible to a pandemic. Novartis will be able to make up to 150 million seasonal influenza vaccines without being constrained by having to order sufficient chickens to produce enough eggs to make the vaccines – essentially a commitment that needs to be made a year in advance. Instead of using eggs, Novartis will be using MDCK cells, as soon as they get official approval from the FDA.40 It is unclear why approval has not been forthcoming, but the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the FDA expressed concern that tests so far have been inconsistent in determining how tumorigenic the MDCK cells are, which poses a regulatory challenge.41 In the meantime, the plant will also have the ability to make the flu vaccine with eggs.

So what are MDCK cells? MDCK cells are another line of immortalized cells, in this case from the kidney of a cocker spaniel.42 Will this be more difficult for people to accept on an emotional level if they find out that their flu vaccine came from a dog -- man’s best friend? Also, the flu vaccine will be live-attenuated, so any virus, bacteria, or oncogenic potential will be injected directly into the vaccine recipients. Now in addition to the endogenous simian and avian viruses we are exposed to, we’ll be subjected to canine viruses as well! There are no safety assays for new, novel viruses, and pathogenicity often takes years to establish. If all of this isn’t frightening enough, vaccine manufacturers have already planned the next phase of vaccine manufacture after immortalized cells when they intend to use actual cancer cells!43,44

So despite the supposedly advanced scientific methods used in vaccine manufacture, we can clearly see that vaccine development is based more on the commitment to vaccinate as many children and adults with as many different vaccines as possible than on proper scientific inquiry, analysis, and a commitment to health. The vast majority of any vaccine consists of unknown fragments, DNA, viruses, bacteria, animal and human cells. Many of them contain ingredients such as eggs, yeast, and now insects, which can cause an anaphylactic reaction in allergic individuals. Clearly, neither the vaccine manufacturers nor the regulatory agencies charged with protecting us want to entertain any challenge to the current system or consider the consequences of this contamination. Why is there such haste to rid the world of all infectious diseases, most of which in the face of proper nutrition and sanitation are minor, and might actually help our overall health by strengthening our immune systems naturally? Is there any evidence that the number of vaccines we are expected to give our children and ourselves will stop increasing year after year? Is this drive to vaccinate motivated by pure greed -- the billions of dollars to be made? It seems that we have allowed a vaccination industry to become much like the military-industrial-complex -- it cannot be touched, questioned, or changed.

Vaccines are supposedly given for the greater good, and our current program requires that the highest possible number of people be vaccinated with full knowledge that many will become chronically ill, disabled, and even die. But what of those among us who want the right to chose NOT to take the risk that our own immune system might not be up to the challenge of so much stimulation? Since vaccination became commonplace from the 1950s to our present day, the health of the average American has gotten worse, and as a nation we have become sicker and sicker. Chronic fatigue, depression, allergies, asthma, attention deficit disorders, autism, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, Parkinson’s, Lou Gehrig’s disease, lupus, asthma, fibromyalgia, IBS – we are plagued with a host of debilitating, chronic diseases that tend not to kill us quickly, but leave us disabled and dysfunctional: dependent on the pharmaceuticals industry to keep us going. We know that we are destroying our own natural immune systems by relying on vaccines to briefly and incompletely protect us against certain bacteria and viruses, but what else is happening to us by allowing ourselves to be injected with this witches’ brew of degradation products? Are we too sick to notice that there is a problem? Time will tell, but how much time do we have?






Endnotes:

1. Edmonson S, “All the Vaccines are Contaminated – Every Last One of Them,” November 29, 2011, Salem-News.com.
2. Peltola, H. et al, “Mumps Outbreaks in Canada and the United States: Time for New Thinking on Mumps Vaccines,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007:45 (15 August)

3. Roberts, Janine, Fear of the Invisible, Impact Investigative Media Productions, 2008
4. ibid
5. Cervarix Package Insert, GlaxoSmithKline
6. Roberts, Janine, Fear of the Invisible, Impact Investigative Media Productions, 2008
7. Seitz, C, et al, “Trypsin Promote Efficient Influenza Vaccine Production in MDCK cells by interfering with the Antiviral Host Response, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011 September 14.
8. Transcript for Public Hearing November 19, 1998: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
9. ibid
10. ibid
11. Miller NZ, “The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences.” Medical Veritas I (2004) 239-251.
12. Vilchez RA, “Simian Virus 40 in Human Cancers,” American Journal of Medicine; 2003 June 1;14(8); 675-84.

13. Victoria JG, “Viral Nucleic Acids in Live-Attenuated Vaccines: Detection of Minority Variants and an Adventitious Virus,” Journal of Virology 2010 June; 84(12); 6033-6040.

14. Medscape Medical News, Medscape Today, May 7, 2010.

15. BALTIMORE, DAVID, “Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase: RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in Virions of RNA Tumour Viruses,” Nature 226, 1209 - 1211 (27 June 1970); doi:10.1038/2261209a016. Transcript for Public Hearing November 19, 1998: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
17. Merck December 11, 2007, Dear Dr. letter announcing details of recall
18. Hough, E. “ Task Force Corner: Size, Workload Distinguishes PDA’s Mycoplasma Task Force,” stagingpda.
19. How Do Mycoplasmas Enter My Cell Culture?” Bionique Testing Laboratories, biunique.com
20. Wilson-David SA, et al “Evaluation of Mycoplasma Inactivation during Production of Biologics: Egg-Based Viral Vaccines as a Model,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2010, p. 2718-2728 “
21. Potts, Barbara, “Buyer Beware: Are You Reducing the Risk of Adventitious Agents in Your Raw Material,” Pharma IQ September 28, 2011, pharma-iq.com.
22. Transcript from, “Evolving Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Cell Substrates for Vaccine Development,” September 7, 1999.
23. Vorbert I, et al, “Susceptibility of Common Fibroblast Cell Lines to Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Agents,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004; 189; 431-9.
24. Poulter, Sean, “Two CJD victims linked to the same polio vaccine,” dailymail.co.uk, December 18, 2001.

25. Barnett A, “Children exposed to CJD infection risk from vaccines,” The Guardian, Saturday 29 May 1999.
26. Caramelli, M, et al, “Evidence for the Transmission of Scrapie to Sheep and Goats from a Vaccine Against Mycoplasma Agalactiae,” Veterinary Record, 2001 April 28; 148 (17); 531-6.
27.Merck, RotaTeq Package Insert
28. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, “Rotavirus vaccination and risk of intussusception;” February 25, 2011.
29. Wahlbert J, et al, “Vaccinations May Induce Diabetes-related Autoantibodies in One-Year-old Children,” Annals of NY Academy of Sciences, 2003 Nov; 1005; 404-8.
30. Classen JB, Classen DC, “Clustering of Cases of Insulin Dependent Diabetes Ococurring Three Years After Haemophilus Influenza B Immunization Supports Causal Relationship Between Immunization and IDDM,” Autoimmunity 2002 Jul; 35 (4); 247-53.
31. Jane Doe v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, January 16, 2009
32. Transcript for Public Hearing November 19, 1998: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
33. Merck, Gardasil Package Insert
34. SANE Vax Inc. Reports Human Papillomavirus DNA Contamination in Gardasil To FDA, Requests Public Safety Investigation, Business Wire. Sept. 6, 2011.

35. Vaccine Excipient and Media Summary, cdc.gov.

36. ibid.

37. Sheets R, “History and Characterization of the Vero Cell Line,” CBER, May 12, 2000.

38. Transcript for Public Hearing November 19, 1998: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting.

39. ibid

40. Tenpenny S, “Novartis is Celebrating – Should We?” December 10, 2009, rense.com

41. Background Summary for the September 25, 2008, VRBPAC Meeting: Use of MDCK Cells for Manufacture of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine.

42. ibid.

43. Transcript from, “Evolving Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Cell Substrates for Vaccine Development,” September 7, 1999.

44. Merten OW. ”Development of serum-free media for cell growth and production of viruses/viral vaccines--safety issues of animal products used in serum-free media.” Dev Biol (Basel). 2002;111:233

[happyexpat]

If the area has alot of flies, or mosquitoes you may want to buy a bottle of REI's Jungle Juice. It is the best stuff for keeping the bugs away. I spray it on my clothing, especially shoes, socks, end of pant, not on skin directly. Bugs like flies and mosquitoes transmit disease!

http://www.rei.com/product/799528/sawyer-jungle-juice-100-pump-spray-insect-repellent-2-fl-oz

It's a pretty tough call... What is worse for you... A vaccine or something that is 98% DEET.

[onawah]

http://www.bolenreport.com/Geier/foiasuit1.htm

I've been working on this story for months. There are so many parts and paths to it, and the information I have gathered is so shocking, it is simply difficult to write.

Maybe it is taking so long because I don't want to be the messenger.

And, I am going to have to break this story up into several parts.

Starting Point...

A man named Brian Hooker PhD has recently filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in Washington DC against the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) demanding that the CDC quit stalling on his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and provide him with the public information he is looking for. Hooker has been making specific FOIA requests to the CDC since March 11, 2005 on the subject of the CDC's five "Thimerosal in vaccines studies." The CDC claims, falsely, that these five studies prove the safety and efficacy of Thimerosal.

Hooker had adequate reasons to be suspicious of the CDC, and their Thimerosal position. I will give you those details in another article.

Hooker is a scientist and knows how studies are supposed to be done. When he examined those five CDC studies he found a number of serious credibility issues with every one of them. So he began asking questions, and it wasn't long before the CDC shut the door. Illegally.

The CDC simply did not want a real scientist asking them pointed questions.

Hooker wants the details, including all communications between the parties involved in the studies' communications (letters, emails, etc.). He has accumulated, over time, a massive amount of information on the subject, and is insistent on getting, and examining, every last piece of paper, email, whatever. The CDC is falling all over itself trying to keep records away from Brian Hooker.

Hooker has a thirteen year old son with Autism. As usual, Brian Hooker's son was just fine prior to being vaccinated.

I have seen what Brian Hooker has already gathered and on the basis of that alone I can easily reach the conclusion, as you would, that:

The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - and Has Covered It Up...

What I am going to tell you about in this article is that the anti-vaccination movement is absolutely right in their concerns about the vaccine situation, and, in fact, many parts of the movement would be far more upset if they knew what I NOW KNOW.

The situation is far worse than you can imagine.

So, let's begin...

Where we are...

There is a massive vaccine construction based in the United States that controls an integral part of the world-wide health care offering. That construction is, rightfully so, a major subject for argument. That "vaccine construction" is made up of an unholy alliance between Federal/State agencies and the vaccine industry. It operates without ANY oversight. None. All efforts to even monitor it are blocked. All efforts.

To balance that there is, world-wide, a significant "anti-vaccination" movement made up of very solid, concerned people. This movement, itself, is diverse in its interests and focus. Often there is disagreement among advocates about the problems and possible solutions.

What everybody, whether pro-vaccination or anti-vaccination, knows, and recognizes quite well, is that since the implementation of an increased mandatory childhood vaccination schedule, major health problems have arisen within the population base served by those vaccinations. The point - the more vaccines there are the more problems we have.

And, as Anne Dachel of Age of Autism (AOA) says, those problems are affecting our society at large.

According to the anti-vaccination movement there are many different concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Those advocates, rightfully, make demand of the government agencies put in place to monitor health programs to INVESTIGATE and FIND SOLUTION to those issues. And that's where the problem becomes exacerbated - those agencies. They are not doing what they are supposed to be doing. They are NOT really investigating and they are certainly NOT finding solutions. They are doing exactly the opposite.

There is something else, entirely, going on here.

Let me simplify the problem by breaking it down into its components...

Every government agency is set up by simple formula. In short, when an agency is created by Congress, or any other means, it is given a Mission, funding, and oversight. That agency is subject to standard US law, including those laws set up to regulate all agencies. And, the employees of that agency are expected to perform their duties according to the law, and the Mission of the agency.

(1) Mission - "THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) is the United States government's principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans and providing essential human services, especially for those who are least able to help themselves." The CDC is part of the HHS.

(2) Oversight - One basic policy that agencies must conform to is "oversight." There are several ways agencies are subjected to oversight, but the one we are interested here we will call "basic citizen oversight," demonstrated by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Data Quality Act (DQA). In short, "we the people" have the right to examine an agency's daily activities. And, we can do that in several ways. One of those is by FOIA Request.

The idea of FOIA, and similar laws in individual States called "Public Records Acts" is fundamental. As an example, just below, is an excerpt from the State of California Public Records Act, enabled by California GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6250-6270. It says:

6250. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature, mindful of the
right of individuals to privacy, finds and declares that access to
information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a
fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state.

6251. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the
California Public Records Act.

Every State in the US has similar law in effect. You can read the entire California Public Records Act by clicking here.

It is easy to see that "we the people" intended, right from the beginning, to control our agencies by observing their daily activities - and that we mean to observe those agencies on a "right now" basis.

In a FOIA situation, for instance, the government agency is required, by law, to respond within twenty (20) days.

Twenty (20) days. Not six (6) years as in the Hooker v CDC case... Keep reading.

Why did "we the people" set in place such laws? Because, simply, "we the people" know, quite well, that we need to control government agencies. In order to control them we need to know, on a daily basis, what they are doing.

Often we hear the statement about an agency being "out of control." An agency hiding what it is doing from the public, unless "we the people" authorized them to hide certain things, is certainly "out of control," for that agency has removed a primary control mechanism.

If an agency is, in fact, "out of control," then it is reasonable to assume that every action it undertakes is NOT in the interests of "we the people." Why else would they operate in that manner?

(3) Malfeasance - Another important factor is the understanding of what the legal term "malfeasance in office" means in regard to Public employees. Malfeasance is considered to be a corrupt act, a crime, and is punishable by imprisonment. A simple explanation is below, an excerpt from the Louisiana State Law:

A. Malfeasance in office is committed when any public officer or public employee shall:

(1) Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or

(2) Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or

(3) Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner.

B. Any duty lawfully required of a public officer or public employee when delegated by him to a public officer or public employee shall be deemed to be a lawful duty of such public officer or employee. The delegation of such lawful duty shall not relieve the public officer or employee of his lawful duty.

C.(1) Whoever commits the crime of malfeasance in office shall be imprisoned for not more than five years with or without hard labor or shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both.

(2) In addition to the penalty provided for in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection, a person convicted of the provisions of this Section may be ordered to pay restitution to the state if the state suffered a loss as a result of the offense. Restitution shall include the payment of legal interest at the rate provided in R.S. 13:4202.

(4) Intentional Obstruction of Justice - Constance V. Vecchione writing for the Massachusetts Bar of Overseers talks, below, about the spoliation of evidence. Why is this important? Because the Courts have held that the Exemption (Exemption b5) rule that CDC uses to deny requests parallels the Rules for Discovery in Civil cases. Vecchione says:

To the spoliator belongs the victory? Not in the post-Enron/Andersen, post Sarbanes-Oxley world. And not in the wake of recent Supreme Judicial Court decisions clarifying the scope of the obligation to retain evidence and the penalties for failure, even negligently, to do so.

Mass. R. Prof. C. 3.4(a), adopted in 1998, prohibits lawyers from unlawfully obstructing another party's access to evidence or unlawfully altering, destroying, or concealing a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. The rule further provides that lawyers cannot counsel or assist another person in such acts. The comment to the rule emphasizes its purpose to insure “fair competition” in the adversary process and to secure opposing parties’ procedural rights of access to evidence through subpoena or discovery.

US Courts are taking destruction or withholding of evidence seriously with both serious civil and criminal penalties. Vecchionne also says:

Beyond civil sanctions, lawyers and clients should also take note of applicable criminal statutes. The federal crime of obstruction of justice is defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1503 to include conduct that, among other things, corruptly endeavors to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice.

More, US Attorney General Eric Holder, on orders from the President, issued a 59 page legal opinion in 2010 on the use of Exemption 5. You can read the whole thing by clicking here. In short, the CDC has no legal leg to stand on withholding information. Just below you will find the opening lines to the Opinion:

"Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act protects "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency." Courts have construed this somewhat opaque language to "exempt those documents, and only those documents that are normally privileged in the civil discovery context."

When administering the FOIA, it is important to first note that the President and Attorney General have issued memoranda to all agencies emphasizing that the FOIA reflects a "profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government" and directing agencies to "adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure."

(5) CDC Funding - 10 billion dollars a year from taxpayers - and there is severe criticism. Watch this short NBC video called CDC Misusing funds. More, take a look at the Congressional Report they are talking about called "CDC Off Center." The report's first page says:

"A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease."

Where's the Beef?

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a US government agency relied upon by, not just the US, but by the entire civilized world, to give guidance and leadership on Planet Earth's health issues. It's opinions and strategies are never questioned and, for various reasons, primarily its control of funding, the CDC, in the US, sets policy on health issues from Washington DC, right through individual State's Public Health structures, down to each and every American citizen.

It's pronouncements are as from God. And if you are in the health care system, you better be a believer.

In the world, most governments look to US CDC policy, assuming, as we have now found out is simply not true, that the US CDC really is a truthful, knowledgeable, source for health information. Especially on vaccines.

It is, we have found, anything but truthful and knowledgeable.

In roughly 1998 certain management employees at the US CDC became aware, through their own official investigation, that there were significant problems with the use of Thimerosal (mercury) as a preservative in vaccines, and that those problems were being exacerbated by the increased vaccine schedule. One of their top researchers was telling them so and had given them a Draft Report. Decisions were made to cover up the report, keeping it away from the public eye.

More, because of what happened next, those CDC employees went on to hire one fake "study" after another countering the results of the original Draft Report. The author of the first of those studies, the so-called Danish Study, is now being indicted for fraud in the US.

Worse, those high level CDC employees, to cover up what was happening, violated, and conspired to violate, several major US laws designed to prevent rogue employees from just this sort of activity.

Those CDC employee's actions had horrible consequences - for a whole world believed them, and relied on their words to establish their own vaccine policies.

The consequences in terms of Autism, alone...

By US government calculations 104 million children, a year (4 million in the US and Canada, and 100 million in the rest of the world), are born into the world covered by the US CDC recommended Childhood Vaccination Schedule.

Autism - We know, for instance, that since the increased Childhood Vaccination Schedule went into effect that Autism rates in the US went from one in ten thousand (1 in 10,000) to one in one hundred ten (1 in 110). A disaster. The CDC response - "we don't know why that's happening." A lie - they did know, and they do know.

Most countries do not yet keep comparative records regarding autism and/or neurological issues. We can only, using the US numbers, extrapolate.

Children are a nation's largest asset...

So let's ask the question "How many children were actually affected?" Let's do the numbers...

World wide (not counting the US and Canada) - From 1998 to 2011 - Autism - (1 in 110) = .9% of 100 million children = 900,000 children - every year.

Let me say that again - 900,000 children, world wide, EVERY YEAR from 1998 to 2011, became Autistic, for a total of eleven million, seven hundred thousand, (11,700,000) children between 1998 and 2011.

Supposedly, Thimerosal was removed from US/Canadian Childhood Vaccines in 2004. So, from 1998 to 2004, using the same formula, one hundred eighty thousand (180,000) US children became Autistic.

Making the World-wide Autism Grand Total - From 1998 to 2011 = 11,880,000 children.

And, that's not the worst of it.

The one in six numbers...

In an earlier article "Some Words About Bobbie Kennedy Junior..." I had discussed reading what Kennedy had said earlier about the CDC. There was a reason I was researching what Kennedy Jr. was saying about vaccines. Kennedy had said that "1 out of 6 children are diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem."

What? One out of six? I was looking through Kennedy's stuff to see where HE got those numbers, and what I found was a page (Kennedy's source) called "AUTISM A. L. A. R. M." which says:

"This project is funded by a cooperative agreement between the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

And, right there on the top page it says:

Autism is prevalent
• 1 out of 6 children are diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem
• 1 in 166 children are diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder
• Developmental disorders have subtle signs and may be easily missed

Listen to parents
• Early signs of autism are often present before 18 months
• Parents usually DO have concerns that something is wrong
• Parents generally DO give accurate and quality information
• When parents do not spontaneously raise concerns, ask if they have any

Act early
• Make screening and surveillance an important part of your practice (as endorsed by the AAP)
• Know the subtle differences between typical and atypical development
• Learn to recognize red flags
• Use validated screening tools and identify problems early
• Improve the quality of life for children and their families through early and appropriate intervention


Refer
• To Early Intervention or a local school program (do not wait for a diagnosis)
• To an autism specialist, or team of specialists, immediately for a definitive diagnosis
• To audiology and rule out a hearing impairment
• To local community resources for help and family support


Monitor
• Schedule a follow-up appointment to discuss concerns more thoroughly
• Look for other features known to be associated with autism
• Educate parents and provide them with up-to-date information
• Advocate for families with local early intervention programs, schools, respite care agencies, and insurance companies
• Continue surveillance and watch for additional or late signs of autism and/or other developmental disorders

In short - the CDC not only knows about the problem, it has discussed it and made recommendations.

The One in Six Numbers...

Doing the numbers: Once again since most countries do not keep records we must extrapolate from US numbers.

One hundred four million (104,000,000) children born every year times thirteen years = 1,352,000,000 children born, worldwide, between 1998 and 2011.

One in six translates to 16.7 %. So 16.7 % of 1,352,000,000 children = 225,784,000 children.

In other words, according to this government agency website, world wide, 225,784,000 children have been "diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem.

Two hundred twenty five million, seven hundred eighty four thousand children have a "developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem?"

That's the equivalent of two thirds of the population of the United States. And the CDC, the supposed health experts, say "we don't know why that's happening."

So who exactly is this CDC?

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a branch of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). It's Mission, given to it by legislation, is supposedly, as follows:
CDC Mission

Collaborating to create the expertise, information, and tools that people and communities need to protect their health – through health promotion, prevention of disease, injury and disability, and preparedness for new health threats.

CDC seeks to accomplish its mission by working with partners throughout the nation and the world to

monitor health,

detect and investigate health problems,

conduct research to enhance prevention,

develop and advocate sound public health policies,

implement prevention strategies,

promote healthy behaviors,

foster safe and healthful environments,

provide leadership and training.

Those functions are the backbone of CDC′s mission. Each of CDC′s component organizations undertakes these activities in conducting its specific programs. The steps needed to accomplish this mission are also based on scientific excellence, requiring well-trained public health practitioners and leaders dedicated to high standards of quality and ethical practice.

High sounding words - right? It would be even better if any of it were true - which it is not. The reality is something totally different, making the CDC in its entirety, an enemy of the American people. In fact, America's worst enemy.

In short, Americans cannot trust ANYTHING the CDC says or does. It has no credibility, whatsoever. Why? It has made certain that it is accountable to no one, and that it has to explain itself to no other entity. Certainly not to the American people.

How do I know this? Because I am in possession of legal documents designed to force the CDC to, once again, answer to the American electorate. I'll show you these documents shortly, and explain them in detail.

In 1998 the CDC Staff compiled a Draft copy of an exacting internal CDC study on vaccines which clearly pointed out all of the dangers of those vaccines, in detail, with explanations of why that was true. CDC management went into shock, forced the head of the study out of the CDC, changed the data and the findings of the study, and brought it out as proving the opposite, even using the original researcher's name on the now faked study's title.

That started a brouhaha. The original researcher would not back down, and loudly, via email, complained about CDC management putting his name on the fake study, reversing his original findings. He did so by addressing the largest, at the time, meeting of the CDC and what they call their "stakeholders," with the REAL results of his study at a place called Simpsonwood, and the reactions to his address had far reaching results

It is those email communications, and others like it, where Brian Hooker began to unravel the CDC plot.

Congressional Oversight ignored...

In 2003, even the US Congress began to smell the CDC stink and investigated. A Report, after a three year investigation, prepared by the Staff of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness Committee on Government Reform United States House of Representatives called "Mercury in Medicine –Taking Unnecessary Risks" made startling conclusions. Like this:

A. Findings - Through this investigation of pediatric vaccine safety, the following findings are made:

1. Mercury is hazardous to humans. Its use in medicinal products is undesirable, unnecessary and should be minimized or eliminated entirely.

2. For decades, ethylmercury was used extensively in medical products ranging from vaccines to topical ointments as preservative and an antibacteriological agent.

3. Manufacturers of vaccines and thimerosal, (an ethylmercury compound used in vaccines), have never conducted adequate testing on the safety of thimerosal. The FDA has never required manufacturers to conduct adequate safety testing on thimerosal and ethylmercury compounds.

4. Studies and papers documenting the hypoallergenicity and toxicity of thimerosal (ethylmercury) have existed for decades.

5. Autism in the United States has grown at epidemic proportions during the last decade. By some estimates the number of autistic children in the United States is growing between 10 and 17 percent per year. The medical community has been unable to determine the underlying cause(s) of this explosive growth.

6. At the same time that the incidence of autism was growing, the number of childhood vaccines containing thimerosal was growing, increasing the amount of ethylmercury to which infants were exposed threefold.

7. A growing number of scientists and researchers believe that a relationship between the increase in neurodevelopmental disorders of autism, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, and speech or language delay, and the increased use of thimerosal in vaccines is plausible and deserves more scrutiny. In 2001, the Institute of Medicine determined that such a relationship is biologically plausible, but that not enough evidence exists to support or reject this hypothesis.

8. The FDA acted too slowly to remove ethylmercury from over-the-counter products like topical ointments and skin creams. Although an advisory committee determined that ethylmercury was unsafe in these products in 1980, a rule requiring its removal was not finalized until 1998.

9. The FDA and the CDC failed in their duty to be vigilant as new vaccines containing thimerosal were approved and added to the immunization schedule. When the Hepatitis B and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b vaccines were added to the recommended schedule of childhood immunizations, the cumulative amount of ethylmercury to which children
were exposed nearly tripled.

10. The amount of ethylmercury to which children were exposed through vaccines prior to the 1999 announcement exceeded two safety thresholds established by the Federal government for a closely related substance – methylmercury. While the Federal Government has established no safety threshold for ethylmercury, experts agree that the methylmercury guidelines are a good substitute. Federal health officials have conceded that the amount of thimerosal in vaccines exceeded the EPA threshold of 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of bodyweight. In fact, the amount of mercury in one dose of DTaP or Hepatitis B vaccines (25 micrograms each) exceeded this threshold many times over. Federal health officials have not conceded that this amount of thimerosal in vaccines exceeded the FDA’s more relaxed threshold of 0.4 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. In most cases, however, it clearly did.

11. The actions taken by the HHS to remove thimerosal from vaccines in 1999 were not sufficiently aggressive. As a result, thimerosal remained in some vaccines for an additional two years.

12. The CDC’s failure to state a preference for thimerosal- free vaccines in 2000 and again in 2001 was an abdication of their responsibility. As a result, many children received vaccines containing thimerosal when thimerosal- free alternatives were available.

13. The Influenza vaccine appears to be the sole remaining vaccine given to children in the United States on a regular basis that contains thimerosal. Two formulations recommended for children six months of age or older continue to contain trace amounts of thimerosal. Thimerosal should be removed from these vaccines. No amount of mercury is appropriate in any childhood vaccine.

14. The CDC in general and the National Immunization Program in particular are conflicted in their duties to monitor the safety of vaccines, while also charged with the responsibility of purchasing vaccines for resale as well as
promoting increased immunization rates.

15. There is inadequate research regarding ethylmercury neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

16. There is inadequate research regarding the relationship between autism and the use of mercury-containing vaccines.

17. To date, studies conducted or funded by the CDC that purportedly dispute any correlation between autism and vaccine injury have been of poor design, under-powered, and fatally flawed. The CDC’s rush to support and promote such research is reflective of a philosophical conflict in looking fairly at emerging theories and clinical data related to adverse reactions from vaccinations.

More, the Congressional Report made Recommendations - which were BLATANTLY ignored. As follows:

B. Recommendations

1. Access by independent researchers to the Vaccine Safety Datalink database is needed for independent replication and validation of CDC studies regarding exposure of infants to mercury-containing vaccines and autism. The current process to allow access remains inadequate.

2. A more integrated approach to mercury research is needed. There are different routes that mercury takes into the body, and there are different rates of absorption. Mercury bioaccumulates; the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) clearly states: “This substance may harm you.”

8. Studies should be conducted that pool the results of independent research that has been done thus far, and a comprehensive approach should be developed to rid humans, animals, and the environment of this dangerous toxin.
3. Greater collaboration and cooperation between federal agencies responsible for safeguarding public health in regard to heavy metals is needed.

4. The President should announce a White House conference on autism to assemble the best scientific minds from across the country and mobilize a national effort to uncover the causes of the autism epidemic.

5. Congress needs to pass legislation to include in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) provisions to allow families who believe that their children’s autism is vaccine-induced the opportunity to be included in the program. Two provisions are key: First, extending the statute of limitations as recommended by the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines from 3 to 6 years. Second, establishing a one to two year window for families, whose children were injured after 1988 but who do not fit within the statute of limitations, to have the opportunity to file
under the NVICP.

6. Congress should enact legislation that prohibits federal funds from being used to provide products or pharmaceuticals that contain mercury, methylmercury, or ethylmercury unless no reasonable alternative is available.

7. Congress should direct the National Institutes of Health to give priority to research projects studying causal relationships between exposure to mercury, methylmercury, and ethylmercury to autism spectrum disorders,
attention deficit disorders, Gulf War Syndrome, and Alzheimer’s Disease.

So, where are we going with this?

The problems caused by the CDC employees that covered up the Thimerosal issue are just about beyond belief.

It is time for a formal investigation of certain key people now, or formerly, at the CDC.

More coming.

Stay tuned.

Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate

[onawah]

[QUOTE]The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up... (Part Two)

The Lawsuit Against the CDC...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

In late 2004 Biochemist Scientist Brian Hooker PhD had had enough. He'd been looking, carefully, through the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s so-called "Evidence" that Thimerosal was "Safe and Effective" as a preservative in vaccines. Having read all of the then available CDC studies making that claim, he, as a PhD Scientist, couldn't help but shake his head "NO." To him, none of the purported proof was anywhere near being scientifically adequate. Far from it.

So, like any math teacher would do to a student he began to communicate to the CDC his questions. In essence he was saying "Show me your work. Show me how you came up with these answers" - a reasonable question series among scientists, teachers and students, and frankly, the population of Planet Earth.

What was CDC's response? STONEWALL - a six year knock-down, drag-out brawl to get that information. Brian Hooker would not let up. Neither would the CDC.

At the CDC, the smell of corruption couldn't be masked, anymore, with air freshener. CDC employees, backed by CDC attorneys, dug in deeper, surrounding themselves with a wall-of-silence, removing themselves from public scrutiny. It was, without doubt, the CDC that President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder had in mind when Holder issued a 59 page Legal Opinion (here) just on this subject. It started out by saying:

"When administering the FOIA, it is important to first note that the President and Attorney General have issued memoranda to all agencies emphasizing that the FOIA reflects a "profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government" and directing agencies to "adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure."

Obama and Holder were, no doubt, provoked by an earlier Congressional Report titled "CDC Off Center," which is summarized, below, with an opening statement:

"A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease."

So, what was provoking Brian Hooker? What, specifically, were his concerns?

I asked Hooker about this situation. I asked him to explain to me in layman's terms, what was wrong, for example, with the very first study, known as "The Danish Study?"

Hooker didn't hesitate. He even wrote it down for me. Then he carefully took me through the scientific jargon representing the scientific method (considering my college days were forty to fifty years ago). Here is what he said about the study known as: “Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative ecological evidence from Danish population-based data” by Kreesten Madsen et al. 2003, published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

He said:

This critique will consider each publication from two perspectives: (1) the scientific quality and (2) any anomalies based on information obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention via the Freedom of Information Act.

“Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative ecological evidence from Danish population-based data” by Kreesten Madsen et al. 2003, published in the journal Pediatrics.

The publication reports an ecological study based on the reported autism incidence in Denmark as recorded in the Denmark National Center for Registry-based Research (NCRR) database. Denmark phased thimerosal containing vaccines out of circulation in 1992. The authors’ premise is that if there is a causal relationship between autism and thimerosal containing vaccines, then the prevalence of autism should decrease in subsequent years. Instead, the study showed a dramatic increase in the number of new autism diagnoses in the years following thimerosal removal, in age groups 2-4, 5-6 and 7-9 years old.

This paper has two severe methodological flaws. First, the Denmark NCRR database changed diagnostic criteria for autism diagnoses in 1994 from ICD8 to ICD10. This led to a greater number of autism diagnoses overall. Second, the Denmark NCRR database changed the accounting of autism based on outpatient visits in 1995, whereas up to 1995, only inpatient (i.e., Hospital) visits were accounted. This led to a significant increase in autism cases counted beyond 1994. In a separate publication, the ratio of inpatients to outpatients accounted for by the NCRR database has been reported to be 13.5:1 (Madsen et al. 2002). These two data artifacts (changing diagnostic criteria and inpatient/outpatient reporting) show a misleading jump in the prevalence of autism after 1995. However, when these are corrected for, the actual autism rates in Denmark decreased by as much as 4 times upon the phase out of thimerosal-containing vaccines (Trelka et al. 2004). Although the raw data from the Madsen et al. 2003 publication has been requested, the authors chose not to release it, creating significant difficulty in confirming this decrease.

It is apparent from emails released by the CDC via the FOIA, that the lead author of the study, Dr. Kreesten Madsen, was well aware of the issues with the Denmark NCRR database. In fact, in a June 2001 email to then acting Deputy Director of the National Immunization Program (NIP) of the CDC, Diane Simpson, Dr. Madsen stated of the increases in autism rates after 1993, “Yes, but not very dramatically and there could be more reasons for that. First of all we had a change from ICD8 to ICD10 in 1994 and furthermore our outpatient clinics were registered in our surveillance from 1995.” It wasn’t until after Dr. Diane Simpson visited Denmark to forge a collaboration with Madsen’s supervisor at Aarhus University that this publication went forward.

In addition, an additional email obtained from the CDC indicates that the autism rates in Denmark decreased between 1999-2001: from Dr. Marlene Lauritsen a coauthor from Aarhus University to Dr. Diana Schendel, a scientist in the National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD) of the CDC, “I need to tell you that the figures in the manuscript do not include the latest data from 2001. I only have these figures as a paper version and they are at work <redacted> But the incidence and prevalence are still decreasing in 2001. <redacted>” These data were excluded from the final publication.

Finally, although the CDC claims that this is an independent publication, co-author Dr. Poul Thorsen was in residence at the CDC at the time of the study. In addition, Dr. Thorsen made a specific request that Dr. Jose Cordero, then director of the NCBDDD write a letter to the editor of the journal Pediatrics for expedited review and publication of the Madsen et al. 2003 study. Dr. Thorsen in April, 2011 was indicted by the U.S. Attorney in Atlanta, Georgia for embezzlement of funds from a CDC grant to his institution, the North Atlantic Neuro-Epidemiology Alliance.

I have, attached, as a link, Brian Hooker's email to me with his critiques of all five of the original CDC studies, plus his analysis of the CDC's 2010 study. They are damning.

So, in short, what in the world is going on?

Brian Hooker is smart. Not just science smart, but street smart. He wasn't going to let a simple STONEWALL keep him from finding out what he needed to know. He just made a few calls, and recruited some other people, around the country, to make CDC FOIA requests, masking, as it were, his original DENIED requests in other batches, from other people. That worked - and he began to build the pattern. Now, as it were, he is at the point, like in doing a jigsaw puzzle, where he can see what's missing - and he is being specific.

Then Brian Hooker PhD met well known Kentucky based attorney Bob Reeves, who introduced him to famous Washington DC based attorney Jim Turner. It wasn't long before there was a Federal lawsuit on the doorstep of the CDC.

Smile here... it is about to get even better.

Before I give you the details of the lawsuit, itself...

I want to tell you what has already happened, besides the fact that the case was filed and served, and the CDC answered. (start an even bigger smile)

On Friday, September 30th, 2011 in the Brian S. Hooker v CDC Federal court case, Judge Amy Berman Jackson more or less told the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to show her a schedule indicating exactly WHEN the CDC would comply with Hooker's FOIA information request. The exact words in the Order were:

"Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. The requirements of LCvR 16.3 and Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure appear to be inapplicable. Defendant shall file a dispositive motion or, in the alternative, a report setting forth the schedule according to which it will complete its production of documents to plaintiff on or before - October 28, 2011. SO ORDERED."

In layman's language the Judge is saying to the CDC: "You better show me a damn good legal reason why you are withholding this information. Frankly, I doubt that you have one. If I don't see one by October 28th, 2011 you better start handing over all the data Brian Hooker wants or face Contempt of Court charges."

The Smoking Gun...

In short, very very soon the CDC situation is going to heat up - one way or another. Why? Because all indications are that those emails and communications are the "smoking gun." showing exactly why, how, and who, covered up the fact that the CDC knew how bad vaccines were, and are. And, who, why, and how the fake studies were arranged, paid for, and published.

Why is this important? Because the whole world of health care has come to rely on the integrity, and reliability of the CDC - which this information strongly contradicts. The issue of mercury, a deadly toxin, being used in vaccines, and protected by the CDC is monumental.

The Exact Wording of the Lawsuit...

You can read the entire lawsuit, in its legal format, by clicking here. Below is an excerpt:

CAUSE OF ACTION FOR COUNT ONE

Violation of the Freedom of Information Act for Wrongful Withholding of Agency Records

13. Defendants have wrongfully withheld agency records requested by plaintiff. Defendants have wrongfully extended 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) exemption 5 to parties outside of CDC by redacting email replies from researchers not employed by CDC and not acting as "consultants" (Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. Department of the Interior, 189 F.3d 1034, 1038 (9th Cir. 1999), aff'd, 532 U.S. 1 (2001)).

14. Defendants have not conducted an adequate search as no records were released from the CDC's National Immunization Program. Later FOIA requests to the CDC yielded significant numbers of correspondences between Dr. Diane Simpson, then acting Deputy Director of the National Immunization Program, and Dr. Kreesten Madsen, the paper's primary author (documents will be submitted as an exhibit). Thus, it is apparent that the CDC did not thoroughly search National Immunization Program records for this particular FOIA request.

15. Plaintiff asks that any application of the (b)(5) exception in this case be waived upon the judge's discretion based on the important and timely nature of the connection of thimerosal in vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism. Although the CDC consistently denies a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism, there is a mounting body of compelling scientific literature that supports this relationship including: (see footnote)

16. Plaintiff has exhausted the applicable administrative remedies with respect to defendants' wrongful withholding of the requested records.

17. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief with respect to the release and disclosure of the requested documents



CAUSE OF ACTION FOR COUNT TWO

Violation of the Freedom of Information Act for Wrongful Withholding of Agency Records

22. Defendants have not provided adequate documents for applying the OMB circular 110, rev. 99, section 36 which states that documents must be released sufficient to repeat the analysis that led to the results of the publication, for a publication that has the force and effect of law. The publication in question, "Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autistic spectrum disorder: a critical review of published original data" by Parker et al. has been used by the CDC to justify the continued use of thimerosal containing vaccines.

23. Plaintiff asks that any application of the (b)(5) exception in this case be waived upon the judge's discretion based on the important and timely nature of the connection of thimerosal in vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism. Although the CDC consistently denies a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism, there is a mounting body of compelling scientific literature that supports this relationship including: (see footnote)

24. Plaintiff has exhausted the applicable administrative remedies with respect to defendants' wrongful withholding of the requested records.

25. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief with respect to the release and disclosure of the requested documents.



CAUSE OF ACTION FOR COUNT THREE

Violation of the Freedom of Information Act for Wrongful Withholding of Agency Records

30. Defendants have not provided adequate justification for applying the (b)(5) "predecisional" exception to over 300 pages of documents. This standard appears to be applied only to documents pertinent to a single publication, pertaining to thimerosal in vaccines and its causal relationship to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.

31. Plaintiff asks that any application of the (b)(5) exception in this case be waived upon the judge's discretion based on the important and timely nature of the connection of thimerosal in vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism. Although the CDC consistently denies a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism, there is a mounting body of compelling scientific literature that supports this relationship including: (see footnote)

32. Plaintiff has exhausted the applicable administrative remedies with respect to defendants' wrongful withholding of the requested records.

33. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief with respect to the release and disclosure of the requested documents.



CAUSE OF ACTION FOR COUNT FOUR

Violation of the Freedom of Information Act for Wrongful Withholding of Agency Records

39. Defendants have not completed a thorough search for agency records requested by plaintiff, including especially the email replies by Dr. Robert Chen.

40. Defendants have not searched for records within the time period June 27, 2001 and August 10, 2001.

41. Plaintiff asks that any application of the (b)(5) exception in this case be waived upon the judge's discretion based on the important and timely nature of the connection of thimerosal in vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism. Although the CDC consistently denies a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism, there is a mounting body of compelling scientific literature that supports this relationship including: (see footnote)

42. Plaintiff has exhausted the applicable administrative remedies with respect to defendants' wrongful withholding of the requested records.

43. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief with respect to the release and disclosure of the requested documents.



REQUESTED RELIEF

WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that this Court:

A. Order defendants to disclose the requested records in their entireties and make copies available to plaintiff;

B. Provide for expeditious proceedings in this action;

C. Award plaintiff its costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in this action;

And

D. Grant such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.



Footnote...

Up in the text of the lawsuit above you will find a place where I typed (see footnote) several times. It was a lot of material to be repeated exactly the same each time, so I decided to put it down here. Read it if you want. What it is is a list of REAL, independent, peer reviewed studies that contradict the CDC crap. Here is the list:

Olczak M, et al.. Persistent behavioral impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats. Behavioural Brain Research (2010), doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.026,

Hewitson L, et al. Delayed Acquisition of Neonatal Reflexes in Newborn Primates Receiving a Thimerosal-Containing Hepatitis B Vaccine: Influence of Gestational Age and Birth Weight. J. Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 2010; 73: 1298-1313,

Dorea JG. Integrating Experimental (In Vitro and In Vivo) Neurotoxicity Studies of Low-Dose Thimerosal Relevant to Vaccines. Neurochem Res. 2011 Jun; 36(6): 927-38. [Epub 2011 Feb 25],

Olczak M, et al. Lasting Neuropathological Changes in Rat Brain After Intermittent Neonatal Administration of Thimerosal. Folia Neuropathologica 2010; 48(4): 258-269,

Geier DA, et al. Blood Mercury Levels in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Is There a Threshold Level? Acta Neurobiology Experimentalis (Warsaw) 2010; 70: 177-186,

Elsheshtawy E, et al. Study of Some Biomarkers in Hair of Children with Autism. Middle East Current Psychiatry 2011; 18: 6-10,

Kern JK, et al. A Biomarker of Mercury Body-Burden Correlated with Diagnostic Domain Specific Clinical Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biometals 2010; 23: 1043-1051,

Majewska MD, et al. Age-Dependent Lower or Higher Levels of Hair Mercury in Autistic Children than in Health Controls. Acta Neurobiology Experimentalis (Warsaw) 2010; 70: 196-208,

Minami T, et al. Induction of Metallothionein in Mouse Cerebellum and Cerebrum with Low-Dose Thimerosal Injection. Cell Biology and Toxicology 2010; 26: 143-152,

Olczak M, et al. Neonatal Administration of Thimerosal Causes Persistent Changes in Mu Opioid Receptors in the Rat Brain. Neurochemical Research 2010; 35: 1840-1847,

Ratajczak H. Theoretical Aspects of Autism: Causes - A Review. J. Immunotoxicology 2011; 8: 68-79,

Hewitson L, et al. Influence of Pediatric Vaccines on Amygdala Growth and Opioid Ligand Binding in Rhesus Macaque Infants: A Pilot Study. Acta Neurobiology Experimentalis (Warsaw) 2010; 70: 147-164,

Lakshmi Priya MD, et al. Level of Trace Elements (Copper, Zinc, Magnesium and Selenium) and Toxic Elements (Lead and Mercury) in the Hair and Nail of Children with Autism. Biological Trace Element Research 2010 Jul 13 [Epub ahead of print], and

Wyrembek P, et al, "Intermingled Modulatory Neurotoxic Effects of Thimerosal and Mercuric Ions on Electrophysiological Responses to GABA and NMDA in Hippocampal Neurons" Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2010; 61: 753-758

More Coming...

This is a several part series. This was number two. In number three I will give you access to EXACTLY what documents, outlining EXACTLY what information, the CDC has had all along - and should have publicly relied on.

More, remember that article I wrote called "The Federal "Data Quality Act" Is Our Friend..." Well, in the third article I will be showing you, also, some things the CDC got from an authoritative public that fit the Data Quality Act requirements - that the CDC refused to even look at...

In other words - not only were CDC employees blocking access to information about their studies - but they were knowingly STONEWALLING changes, as required by the US Data Quality Act.

Stay tuned.

Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate


Links for Parts 3, 4 and 5 here:

http://www.bolenreport.com/Geier/foiasuit2.htm

[Phoenix]

I ended up getting the vaccine yesterday, rationalizing that Yellow Fever vaccines don't have thimerisol in them, and, fear of yellow fever, and the thoughts that, my conspiratorial thinking is flawed and making me fearful of the vaccine... :Cry:

[Dawn]

Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared,
"The only safe vaccine is one that is never used."


Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic [1] in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.

Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.

In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated [2] person."

There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.

Martin Pytela

Life Enthusiast Co-op
http://www.life-enthusiast.com

[baddbob]

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6WQtRI7A064


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jyO0aJ3iCpc