PDA

View Full Version : Stop SOPA, Save the Internet



applejax
16th November 2011, 16:57
Have you guys heard about this? I went on my tumblr page today and almost had a heart attack...everything was censored (no joke) until I looked at the info about stopping the censorship (after that my page went back to normal).

I'm sure this is very important...I don't think we would be able to communicate with each other if this is allowed...just my two cents.

==========================================

Here's the link with video: http://boingboing.net/2011/11/11/stop-sopa-save-the-internet.html

Google knows it. Viacom knows it. The Chamber of Commerce knows it. Internet democracy groups know it. BoingBoing knows it. But, the Internet hasn't been told yet -- we're going to get blown away by the end of the year. The worst bill in Internet history is about to become law. Law is very real here in the United States and legal language is often different than stated intentions -- this law would give government and corporations the power to block sites like BoingBoing over infringing links on at least one webpage posted by their users. Believe the EFF, Public Knowledge, Google when they say this bill is about much more than copyright, it's about the Internet and free speech everywhere.

The MPAA, RIAA, Hollywood knows that they have been flying in CEOs of as many companies as possible, recruiting people to get petition signups at malls in California, and here's the big point-- they know they have gotten their message through to Congress -- the worst bill in Internet history, the one where government and their corporations get unbelievable power to take down sites, threaten payment processors into stopping payment to sites on a blacklist, and throw people in jail for posting ordinary content is about to pass before the end of this year. The only thing that is going to stop Hollywood from owning the Internet and everything we do, is if there is a big surprise Internet backlash starting right now.

PROTECT IP (S. 968)/SOPA (HR. 3261) creates the first system for Internet censorship - this bill has sweeping provisions that give the government and corporations leeway and legal cover for taking down sites "by accident," mistakenly, or for NOT doing "enough" to protect the interests of Hollywood. These bills that are moving very quickly through Congress and can pass before Christmas aim to give the US government and corporations the ability to block sites over infringing links posted by their users and give ISPs the release to take any means to block peoples' sites, including slowing down your connection. That's right, some say this bill is a workaround to net neutrality and is bigger than net neutrality.

This is the worst piece of Internet legislation in history - the lawmakers who have been sponsoring (Leahy, Lamar Smith, Conyers) this bill need to be shamed by the Internet community for wasting taxpayer dollars on a bill that would break the very fabric of the Internet, create an Internet blacklist, kill jobs and great startup companies, huge blogs, and social networks.

Everyone, the entire Internet community needs to stand together if we don't want to see this bill actually become law. Internet and democracy groups are planning an Internet-wide day of protest called American Censorship Day on Wednesday, November 16th for the day Congress holds a hearing on these bills to create the first American Internet censorship system. Every single person with a website can join and needs to.

Boing Boing, Grooveshark, Free Software Foundation, The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge, Demand Progress, Open Congress/PPF, TechDirt, Fight for the Future and dozens of other sites have created this day to ask you to join them to stop S. 978 and HR 3261, as hard as you can. Write them, protest, call them, protest, support your favorite sites, protest, sign a letter, block out your site, protest.

Many public intellectuals who are often the ones to help win the public interest over and over are about to come out to lead the charge to stop PROTECT IP/ SOPA - they have to when they learn that the House and Senate will be working to pass this bill before the Christmas. From those doing work on the hill, it's very clear we have been stacked comparatively lightly. The House bill has 40 co-sponsors and major industry support. The only thing that will change the dynamic now is if Congress gets a knock on their door by CEO"s of small and large tech companies, blogs, and news sites and if Internet users start piling on, one by one, and protest.

Tech companies, blogs, news sites are already in a death-do-die battle cry -- listen to them -- it's a few days before the hearing on this bill. But, we need more tech companies, blogs, new sites before the hearing on this bill. Help get them.

I've been trying to think about whether or not the world is going to end if this bill passes like it's supposed to -- and the answer is, "kind of yes". When small sites, and it's the small sites that get turned off in the night and no one for the most part notices, say my friend's political blog or news site gets blocked by the US government and she has no way to get it back up even though everything she did was legal according to current law, and no one can help her except she can choose to file suit to defend herself, I feel like I die inside a little. Living in a country where you are being shut out and left powerless to really defend yourself is like living in another country, the ones you hear about. Life starts to feel shot when that happens, especially to our friends or our favorites sites.

Every site who has user-generated content, posts links or videos to anything copyrighted in it could face new legal threats.

If a copyrights holder disliked links you have on your site, they could simply file a complaint with a payment processor (Visa, PayPal), who would then have 5 days to respond to their request or risk legal ramifications. If bills like this are allowed to pass, we'll be spending another $47 million dollars every year to help corporations fill out and enforce Internet blacklists.

Sites that would be legal under the DMCA and its safe harbor provisions would now risk losing everything for allowing user generated content. It also has added in the streaming felony bill that would make it so ordinary Internet users are at risk of going to jail for 5 years for post any copyrighted work that would cost $2,500 to license. And because copyright is so broad, that means videos with copyrighted music in the background, kids in a school play, people singing karaoke could all be a risk.

Because the law affects almost every Internet user and the sites they use every day and have come to love, and because granting sweeping blacklisting powers is just sickening to almost everyone, we need your help -- if you can encourage your favorite site to join the protest, and help drive the maximum number of people to contact Congress on November 16th (until the bill dies), please help.

These bills represent a major blow to openness and freedom on the Internet, free speech rights, and the fabric of the Internet itself. If SOPA is allowed to pass, the Internet and free speech will never be the same again.

Black Panther
18th November 2011, 17:04
I just found out about Protect IP / Sopa Act. I wanted to start a thread,
but it's already there. There is already a link to a website with a video,
but I post this video again, because imo it's a pretty important issue.
Maybe there are more people who missed this one. Without having to read
a lot of text this video makes it pretty clear.

There is a website to vote against those acts:
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/?fp

ahvmFL5Ra68

risveglio
19th December 2011, 00:45
I thought this was a good explanation which I found only because it is trending on YouTube. Hopefully that is a good sign though most I talk to seem to have no idea.

JhwuXNv8fJM

Darla Ken Pearce
19th December 2011, 01:53
Please understand that all the draconian laws including the Patriot Act and numerous others too lengthy to list here are all going away like the dinosaur stuck in the La Brea Tar pits. Once we have decent leadership, they will all go away and be banished into the dust bin of history.

Furthermore, back in days of old ~ prior to a graphical interface on the internet and days prior to the friendly screen ~ yes, way back when the Internet was a black screen with mainly "bulletin boards" and little else; Apple ran an experiment to see if "people" hubs were possible should the internet ever go down. Not only did we prove this could be done (and I was a part of this experiment called, 'OneNet') but we established hubs in major cities piggy-backed from individual-to-individual BBS's and it was a wonderful success.

It can be done with minimum expense and new Nets could arise in no time at all should this one go down for any reason other than power outages. We can even deal with downed satellites by using other sources of connectivity. We worked hard on this project on a volunteer basis and it was a success. Quickly it was dismantled but the plans linger on forever. The knowledge of how well it can work and how to accomplish it. Never fear. This isn't the first time people have thought of the consequences of various restrictions on our freedom to communicate with each other. And many have already tried things out ~ like Apple Computer ~ should such a hazard befall us.

Once you know this is possible (and we proved it quickly) there is nothing to fear along these lines. There is no stopping the flow of information. Period. It's too late for that now. These old ways of controlling us are obsolete and should trouble you no more.

Fight these last bits of duality and abuse through laws and protest ~ if you wish ~ but never fall for the phoney lie and belief that we can be stopped because we can't be stopped and that's a fact. And so it is...

Candor
19th December 2011, 01:55
In order for us to perform our due diligence, we need to get the whole of the bill on line here. Can you put that up for us? Then we need someone to write a more condensed version of your article above. Just the facts with compelling language to share this with others via email and blogging... and ink press would be good also even if we think ink is slow--it reaches more people. My apologizes for not offering to do all this myself, but you see, I am working on another front for Freedom. I am very busy here with coordinating a new culture coming into our reality. (I will entertain inquiries at truthrizing@yahoo.com)

This project is truly important to us. We must keep our ability to communicate wide open.

Sincerely,
Candor
BTW--I need a walk-about CB radio. any donations?
ww

Candor
19th December 2011, 02:32
Hi Darla, Thank you for your comment. Could you recite for us the basics necessary for creating a people Hub, based net-work. I think that is a great idea.

I would like to learn more about htis old Apple circa networking experience you had. This is a very good idea, and I hope we can share some posts regarding this idea and maybe start a "Know-Thy-Neighbor" movement or something.

BTW--I would like to be friends with you, but I don't know where/ how to find that proper Icon, heck with it. I'm from the old school; I'ld rather just carry your books home from school--even if you lived 3 miles in the other direction.--Your picture is cute.



ww

risveglio
19th December 2011, 03:27
In order for us to perform our due diligence, we need to get the whole of the bill on line here. Can you put that up for us? Then we need someone to write a more condensed version of your article above. Just the facts with compelling language to share this with others via email and blogging... and ink press would be good also even if we think ink is slow--it reaches more people. My apologizes for not offering to do all this myself, but you see, I am working on another front for Freedom. I am very busy here with coordinating a new culture coming into our reality. (I will entertain inquiries at truthrizing@yahoo.com)

This project is truly important to us. We must keep our ability to communicate wide open.

Sincerely,
Candor
BTW--I need a walk-about CB radio. any donations?
ww

You can find the full text of SOPA here
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h112-3261

And PIPA here
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s112-968

baddbob
20th December 2011, 18:51
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-xlg4lpwkyk


It's pretty problematic how former Senator Chris Dodd is vehemently defending the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) with the same argument that despots have been using to justify censorship for years. Now the head of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and one of SOPA's most outspoken proponents, Dodd's logic sort of folds back onto itself. "Hollywood is pro-Internet. We stand with those who strongly oppose foreign governments that would unilaterally block websites and thus deny the free flow of information and speech," Dodd said on Tuesday at the Center for American Progress. "So I want to make it clear right at the outset that our fight against content theft is not a fight against technology. It is a fight against criminals."

We've heard this line before. Indeed, targeting "criminals" serves as a handy, sweeping justification for any ruling power to whittle away at civil rights in the name of the law. In learning more about the history of web censorship, we stumbled across some startlingly similar instances in which the anti-Internet regimes -- here's a list -- explained how they're actually fighting crime, rather than freedom when the block people from visiting websites.

China

The Great Firewall of China is probably the most famous of the various government Internet censorship efforts. The government can apparently add new keywords to block certain kinds of sites or even specific kinds of content whenever it wants. Take earlier this year when China shunned the Nobel Peace Prize Committee and blocked news sites from reporting on Liu Xiaobo, the imprisoned Chinese dissident who won this year's prize for standing up for freedom of speech. Why'd they do that? "Liu Xiaobo is a criminal," the Chinese Foreign Ministry explained.

But SOPA is about enforcing copyright law, Dodd might contend. Even the tech companies that oppose SOPA admit that they're open to finding better ways to protect intellectual property, though Harvard law professor Jonathan Zittrain recently told The Atlantic Wire that the government hasn't done any real data-driven research to prove that it would even be effective. The problem with the law, critics say, is less the intended purpose than it is the possible execution. The Chinese government has taken this position too and should the U.S. government agree to something like SOPA, some say, it could open up even more censorship around the world. "In China 'copyright' is one of many excuses to crack down on political movements," Chinese blogger Isaac Mao told CNN recently. "If a new law like SOPA is introduced in the U.S., the Chinese government and official media will use it to support their version of 'anti-piracy.'"

India

The Indian government is less consistent than China in how it censors the web, but the reasoning is often the same. Just this week, India's acting telecommunications minister Kapil Sibal spoke out about blocking content on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter in order "to remove disparaging, inflammatory or defamatory content before it goes online." (Read: keep citizens from criticizing the Indian government.) How do they justify that? The digital rights advocates at the Electronic Frontier Foundation explain:

The world’s largest democracy has been known to censor online content from time to time, typically under the guise of national security or obscenity. The Indian Computer Emergency Response Team is tasked with issuing blocking orders, while Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows police commissioners to identify and order the blocking of material that contains a threat or nuisance to society.

Again, it's not specifically about censoring the internet. It's about punishing criminals.

Syria

Syria's been particularly duplicitous about misinformation lately, but blocking the internet in the name of the law has been going on there for years. In 2008, The Economist reported on the censorship problem in Syria by focusing on how the government interpreted laws quite broadly, not only to censor the Internet but actually convict bloggers of crimes:

For "defaming and insulting the administrative bodies of the state", the president of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, Mazen Darwish, was recently sentenced to a salutary ten days in jail. His real crime was to report on riots in an industrial town near Damascus, Syria’s capital. Reporters Without Borders, a Paris-based lobby, said his case brought the number of journalists and "cyber dissidents" imprisoned in Syria to seven. …

For several years Syria has been an enemy of the internet. The security services keep opposition figures and even ordinary bloggers under surveillance. The main internet service-provider bans 100-plus websites. Most sites carping at President Bashar Assad’s government are silenced, as are many Kurdish and Islamist sites. A yellow screen flashes up with the words "Access Denied".

So Syria is extra bad because they not only block the sites, they throw bloggers in jail. Because they're criminals, the government contends.

Update: Google chairman Eric Schmidt invoked Dodd on Wednesday afternoon, when he said that SOPA would "criminalize linking and the fundamental structure of the Internet itself." (See what he did there? Folding Dodd's logic back onto itself…) Schmidt continued, "By criminalizing links, what these bills do is they force you to take content off the Internet" a measure known as censorship in many circles. Including this Harvard law professor who says that SOPA violates Americans' First Amendment rights.

baddbob
28th December 2011, 16:53
MGM vs Grokster Copyright Ruling: "We hold that one who "DISTRIBUTES" a "DEVICE" with the object of "PROMOTING" its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is "LIABLE" for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties." . . . . . . . Regardless of the device's non-infringing uses.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WJIuYgIvKsc

risveglio
28th December 2011, 17:10
Does A Simple Firefox Add-On Make SOPA Useless?

http://www.webpronews.com/does-a-simple-firefox-add-on-make-sopa-useless-2011-12

toad
28th December 2011, 20:46
Does A Simple Firefox Add-On Make SOPA Useless?

http://www.webpronews.com/does-a-simple-firefox-add-on-make-sopa-useless-2011-12

It will help, there will always be ways to circumvent their efforts to censor the internet. Its not really the point though. Operation Blackout is in full effect, anon/lulzsec is planning to spread stickers/stencils so people can help spread the word about SOPA.

taizen
30th December 2011, 19:47
I'm wondering if the 'sleepers' will wake up when they begin to see the big red sign?
SOPA update Fox news style (http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/12/30/will-google-amazon-and-facebook-blackout-net/)

12356

Ilie Pandia
30th December 2011, 20:01
-== THiS POST HAS BEEN CENSORED BY SOPA ==-