The POPE is PURE EVIL (Tell me What You See)

[jackovesk]

LONG GONE are the Days of (She Will Be Right Mate), we ALL KNOW the difference between RIGHT & WRONG. We ALL KNOW about the MASSIVE COVERUP of the Catholic Church!

There are alot of people who contribute to this forum that have excellent intuitve insight.

If you take one Look at this picture tell me what you see?

http://everythingbutamericasucks.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/pope.jpg

All I see is PURE EVIL, not to mention the COVERUP of Peodifile Preditors thoughout the Catholic Church! The TRUTH will come out about this Sick Ba$tard one day. But unfortunately it's already too Late!

PS - Just to rub it in have a look at the insignia in the middle of his FishHat, "A Shepherd on a Throne with a Child on his Lap.

[MorningSong]

To me, after such a fine man (Pope) as John Paul II seems to have been, this man gives me the willies!

I have noticed how sickly he looks and, how so often he just looks awful... if not down right evil like you say. I don't think he will last for much longer.

[john.d]

He cant hide it can he , ive seen a few pictures of him that makes him look like a bad guy from a horror movie . The vatican and the jesuits have been at it a long time and have more power and influence than most people realise .
This is a good view by stephen fry about them :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL5WVecNdhk

[Solphilos]

I can't help but laugh every time I see that guy, lol. I sometimes expect to see fangs between that trademark wicked sneer of his.

I personally believe that ones personality becomes written in the lines, contours and shape of ones facial features, and this guy just looks like insane.

[777]

He cant hide it can he , ive seen a few pictures of him that makes him look like a bad guy from a horror movie . The vatican and the jesuits have been at it a long time and have more power and influence than most people realise .
This is a good view by stephen fry about them :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL5WVecNdhk

Awsome speech isn't it john!! Saw that a while back, he absolutely nails it! Even if he was the nicest man in the world (the pope I mean not Stephen) it doesn't alter the fact he was in Hitler's Youth. Forgiveness is the christian message but come ON!?!

[RedeZra]

imagine that

evil institutionalized

it's a good thing that our governments

recruit from the lodges and not the churches

[Elandiel BernElve]

PS - Just to rub it in have a look at the insignia in the middle of his FishHat, "A Sheperd on a Throne with a Child on his Lap.

Look carefully, its a lamb down in front of his legs, not a child. Its easy to see what you wanna see. I dont like the vatican institute and dont trust the pope at all but we should always interpret things without prejudice.

[Steven]

The Nature of Physiognomy

The term "physiognomy" refers to features of the face, especially so http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/media/latskult_flip.gif (http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/anatomy/cranium.jsp) when, in the narrow sense, these features are used to infer the relatively enduring character or temperament of an individual. On this site, physiognomy connotes a broader meaning, i.e., it refers to relatively unchanging facial features that might convey messages about any inner or hidden aspect of the person. Most of these facial features have as their basis the bony structure of the skull, on which the soft tissues lie. These features include the shapes and positions of major areas and landmarks of the face, such as the forehead, eyebrows, nose, cheeks, and mouth. The important facial features can be fairly accurately reconstructed by experts from the skull alone. A diagram of the human cranium (http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/anatomy/cranium.jsp) shows the major features of the skull, from which much of the visible appearances of the face can be extrapolated. Other physiognomic features are not directly linked to the bony skull, such as skin texture and coloration, hair placement and texture, and detailed shapes of fleshy features. All of these features change slowly and relatively little over time, and they are the sign vehicles for physiognomic messages. Proposing an association between these facial features and other aspects of the person, including personality, character, outcomes of medical treatment, romantic compatibility,or the destiny of the person, is a physiognomic approach. The validity of the association or inference based on physiognomy is a separate issue that can be established or discredited by empirical evidence. Accurately face reading these signs depends upon knowing which relations are valid and which are spurious.
Types of Messages

What might such physiognomic messages be about? Well, logically, as the signs of physiognomy change little or slowly, they can only be about characteristics that are relatively enduring and that change little or not at all. Such messages might include a person's genetic background (e.g., race, ethnicity, and family membership), genetic diseases (e.g., Down's syndrome), and more fuzzy concepts such as personality, character, and temperament. These facial features are unlikely to convey messages about characteristics that change rapidly or often, such as a transient emotions, because they cannot capture such rapid changes in their time scale of change. However, the possibility remains that repeated transient experiences, such as an often elicited emotion, might cumulate an effect on such slowly changing features. Also, observers often confuse some of these permanent signs with transient signs that actually do convey information about rapidly changing characteristics.
Topics related to physiognomy have a very long history in human cultures. In China and other Asian cultures, formal http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/media/chinmusc.jpgsystems of face reading techniques developed sometime in the first millennia b.c.e., integrated with religious beliefs such as Confucianism. Substantial confidence in such methods developed in these cultures, and physiognomic inferences included descriptions of character, suitability for certain positions, and predictions about life and death. In Western cultures, the association of facial features with a person's characteristics also has a history, first noted in the writings of the ancient Greeks. Much later, several pseudo-scientific and cultish movements exploited the inference of character from physiognomic features. The physiognomy movement proper (which cultivated the narrow connotation for this term) was Phrenology, popularized by the 18th century Swiss philosopher Lavater. Some other applications of physiognomy are discussed further on the Physiognomy Applications (http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/apps.jsp) page.
The face, despite recent advances in assessing identity such as biometrics and DNA testing, remains paramount in ordinary experience for identifying a individual person. The relatively permanent features of the face convey most of the information about http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/media/washton1.gif (http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/physiognomy/physiognomy.jsp#) identity, although styles in the production of more transient signals and other body shapes and sizes may also contribute to identity information. The signs of identity can be preserved in representations as schematic as the monochromatic drawing at the right, which Americans can easily identify as George Washington. Such permanent features of the face also convey information about the genetic background of the individual, including ancestry and ethnicity.
Tools for Studying Physiognomy

Visage (http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/visage/about_visage.jsp) is a project that attempts to represent the features that are used to describe the face and the characteristics that are associated with such facial features. A relational database stores the feature names, the characteristics, and the relations among them. You can get an idea of what this database contains from the Visage applet. It shows illustrations of a limited set of facial features that you can use to describe a face, then retrieves some of the descriptions that have been associated with these features.

Edit: I would personally add to this all, that our innate knowledge subconsciously tells us a lot about a person just by the "look" and "attitude" of this given person. Just like when someone is lying, deeply inside we know it, we are just unconscious about it.

Namaste, Steven

[Solphilos]

[B]

Edit: I would personally add to this all, that our innate knowledge subconsciously tells us a lot about a person just by the "look" and "attitude" of this given person. Just like when someone is lying, deeply inside we know it, we are just unconscious about it.

Namaste, Steven

Very true. I've always had an acute ability to interpret a persons thoughts, emotions and intentions simply by looking at their face. Not many people are able to lie to me, or hide how they truly feel. It's very intuitive, and perhaps for the reasons you stated.

If only everyone were able to do this to an even stronger degree, perhaps honesty would be much more common than it currently is.

[HORIZONS]

I have been negatively judged by people so many times over the years because they didn't like the way I looked, or the expression on my face, but none of those that judged me in these ways could see my heart. There are many people with beautiful faces and outward conditions that are the manifestation of pure evil within themselves - but you would never know it by looking at their face. Likewise, there are many people that look mean and evil but they have a beautiful heart that is hidden within them. I would not say that this man is evil because of the way he looks - but by the actions of his heart.

[Humble Janitor]

Other than posts about junk science, I have to agree in regards to the current Pope. The guy looks evil, much like Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars. He could probably get a starring role in another Star Wars movie if the Vatican is hard up for cash over time. I call it karmic justice when they have to sell churches to settle lawsuits.

[Steven]

Other than posts about junk science...

If you are referring to my post on Physiognomy, I find your qualifier "junk" is quite inappropriate. You obviously didn't look much into it. Here, take a closer look at the "junk" science.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiognomy

If you really make the effort, you will notice that beauty, as our widespread white anglo-saxon "standard", isn't meaning goodness. Or ugliness meaning evilness. These are stereotypes brainwashed by the entertainment industry.

Namaste, Steven