Australian Govt. THREAT (Vaccinate your Kids) or Else..!

[jackovesk]

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2010/11/27/1225962/003551-vaccination.jpg

Vaccinate children or Lose Money - Vaccination tied to tax benefits

November 25, 2011 4:04PM

http://resources0.news.com.au/images/2011/06/02/1226068/032968-nicola-roxon.jpg
Immunisation is fundamental to a child's lifelong health, says Nicola Roxon. Source: The Australian
THE Federal Government will withhold $2100 in tax benefits for families who refuse to vaccinate their children.
The move is a drive by the Gillard Government to boost vaccination rates, with one in 10 Australian children not immunised.

It comes as part of a major shake-up of the national immunisation program which includes the introduction of more vaccines.

Children will have to be vaccinated against chicken pox, meningococcal C and pneumococcal from July 1, 2013.

A new combination vaccine will also be added to the program in 2013 to protect children against four different diseases - measles, mumps, rubella and chicken pox.

This vaccine will be given to children at 18 months, instead of the age of four when they had their MMR jab to protect against measles, mumps and rubella.

The Government will announce today that from July 1 families will need to have their children fully immunised to receive the family tax benefit part A end-of-year supplement.

The supplement, worth $726 per child each year, will now only be paid once a child is fully immunised at one, two and five years of age, meaning more than $2100 could be withheld.

A new immunisation check will be introduced for one year olds to supplement the existing checks at two and five years of age.

Families are already required to have their child fully vaccinated to receive the childcare rebate and childcare benefit.

The new arrangements will replace the maternity immunisation allowance which provides $129 for families who meet immunisation requirements when their child is two and five.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon said: "We know that immunisation is fundamental to a child's lifelong health and that's why we want to make sure that children are immunised at the right time.

"We want all Australian kids to grow up healthy, and immunisation is essential to that."

The Government will also announce a new campaign to advise parents and healthcare providers on what they can do to protect their babies from whooping cough.

New parents will receive letters providing information on immunising against whooping cough, and how to identify the disease and prevent it spreading.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/inject-children-or-lose-money/story-e6frea8c-1226205819461

PS - The worst part of about the story, is that this is just the 'Beginning'..!

Hitlarian Serform & Draconian Laws are alive and kicking (Down Under)..!

Spawned from our beloved leader JuLIAR Gillard...

Here's a picture of her in the 'Fetal Stage'...

http://media.adamdodson.org/var/resizes/Random/watermelon%20fetus.jpg?m=1309416904

Here she is all 'Grown Up'...

http://guttertrash.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/clipboard014.jpg?w=416&h=224

[Jonathon]

Wow nice tactic. That's almost as good as forced segregation of non-vaccinated kids.

[Lord Sidious]

So who has liability for anything that goes wrong?
If they tell you no one, then don't believe them.
There is no power at law to excuse themselves from liability.

[Ineffable Hitchhiker]

http://i54.tinypic.com/334n12s.gif

I don´t get mad often, but this infuriates me!!!

And then to have a poll called MONEY JAB asking :-

Should parents be penalised if they don't have their children vaccinated?



Ugh!
They are dangling the money carrot.
My advice to parents would be to find out how to obtain legal exemption.

[Wisdom]

There is a lot of shady stuff happening in Australia lately, the past few weeks have been very fishy.

[Lord Sidious]

http://i54.tinypic.com/334n12s.gif

I don´t get mad often, but this infuriates me!!!

And then to have a poll called MONEY JAB asking :-

Should parents be penalised if they don't have their children vaccinated?



Ugh!
They are dangling the money carrot.
My advice to parents would be to find out how to obtain legal exemption.

Why would you need an exemption?
They don't have the power to compel medical treatment.
They can't even force jabs on you in the army.

[Ineffable Hitchhiker]

What would you do, if you were a mother and they refused a place for your child, in a Kindergarten or school, if you could not produce a vaccination report card?


In the United States, policy interventions, such as immunization requirements for school entry, have contributed to high vaccine coverage and record or near-record lows in the levels of vaccine-preventable diseases. Herd immunity, induced by high vaccination rates, has played an important role in greatly reducing or eliminating continual endemic transmission of a number of diseases, thereby benefiting the community overall in addition to the individual vaccinated person.

Article
(http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa0806477#t=articleTop)


Or a parent who is turned away by a pediatrician because they refuse to immunize their child?


Some pediatricians refuse to treat children whose parents oppose immunizations
Article
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/some-pediatricians-refuse-to-treat-children-whose-parents-oppose-immunizations/2011/09/22/gIQAgPg3zK_story.html)



I do realise that all this is MainStreamMedia fear porn, but what if you are a parent and have to make a decision for your child?

We need some discerning advice for others if all this becomes reality.

[Lord Sidious]

What would you do, if you were a mother and they refused a place for your child, in a Kindergarten or school, if you could not produce a vaccination report card?


In the United States, policy interventions, such as immunization requirements for school entry, have contributed to high vaccine coverage and record or near-record lows in the levels of vaccine-preventable diseases. Herd immunity, induced by high vaccination rates, has played an important role in greatly reducing or eliminating continual endemic transmission of a number of diseases, thereby benefiting the community overall in addition to the individual vaccinated person.

Article
(http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa0806477#t=articleTop)


Or a parent who is turned away by a pediatrician because they refuse to immunize their child?


Some pediatricians refuse to treat children whose parents oppose immunizations
Article
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/some-pediatricians-refuse-to-treat-children-whose-parents-oppose-immunizations/2011/09/22/gIQAgPg3zK_story.html)



I do realise that all this is MainStreamMedia fear porn, but what if you are a parent and have to make a decision for your child?

We need some discerning advice for others if all this becomes reality.

I would use their own laws against them.
Is that not discrimination?

[antelucem]

this is partially a beat up by the media and possibly where the government is heading. However, as it stands at the moment (and I have checked the centrelink website), you can still object to being vaccinated either on medical grounds on concientious grounds and need a COF (Concienctious Objection Form) filled out by the GP as per the current process. What is changing is they are removing the immunisation payment and making this a condition of getting an existing benefit.

This is not to say that they might change the condition in the future but is as it stands at the moment.

[toothpick]

Immunisation used to be a marvelous medical invention that helped a lot of sick people.
Now, it is just another manipulation tool for tptb.
Who, would trust any current government to inject a still developing child with anything?

[ktlight]

FYI:
"THE Federal Government will withhold more than $2100 in tax benefits for families who refuse to vaccinate their children.

The move is a drive by the Gillard Government to boost vaccination rates, with one in 10 Australian children not immunised.

It comes as part of a major shake-up of the national immunisation program which includes the introduction of more vaccines.

Children will have to be vaccinated against chicken pox, meningococcal C and pneumococcal from July 1, 2013.

A new combination vaccine will also be added to the program in 2013 to protect children against four different diseases - measles, mumps, rubella and chicken pox.

This vaccine will be given to children at 18 months, instead of the age of four when they had their MMR jab to protect against measles, mumps and rubella.

The Government will announce today that from July 1 families will need to have their children fully immunised to receive the family tax benefit part A end-of-year supplement.

The supplement, worth $726 per child each year, will now only be paid once a child is fully immunised at one, two and five years of age, meaning more than $2100 could be withheld.

A new immunisation check will be introduced for one year olds to supplement the existing checks at two and five years of age.

Families are already required to have their child fully vaccinated to receive the childcare rebate and childcare benefit.

The new arrangements will replace the maternity immunisation allowance which provides $129 for families who meet immunisation requirements when their child is two and five.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon said: "We know that immunisation is fundamental to a child's lifelong health and that's why we want to make sure that children are immunised at the right time.

"We want all Australian kids to grow up healthy, and immunisation is essential to that."

The Government will also announce a new campaign to advise parents and healthcare providers on what they can do to protect their babies from whooping cough.

New parents will receive letters providing information on immunising against whooping cough, and how to identify the disease and prevent it spreading."

source
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/inject-children-or-lose-money/story-fn7x8me2-1226205382138

A baby's immune system is not fully developed until he/she is about six months-old. In the meantime, pregnant mothers pass immunoglobulin antibodies from their bloodstream, through the placenta, and to the fetus. These antibodies are an essential part of the fetus's immune system. They identify and bind to harmful substances, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi that enter the body. This triggers other immune cells to destroy the foreign substance.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the only antibody that crosses the placenta to the fetus during pregnancy. IgG antibodies are the smallest, but most abundant antibodies, making up 75-80% of all the antibodies in the body. They are present in all body fluids and they are considered to be the most important antibodies for fighting against bacterial and viral infections. These antibodies help protect the fetus from developing an infection inside the womb.

Immediately after birth, the newborn has high levels of the mother's antibodies in the bloodstream. Babies who are breastfed continue to receive antibodies via breast milk. Breast milk contains all five types of antibodies, including immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin D (IgD), immunoglobulin E (IgE), IgG, and immunoglobulin M (IgM). This is called passive immunity because the mother is "passing" her antibodies to her child. This helps prevent the baby from developing diseases and infections.

During the next several months, the antibodies passed from the mother to the infant steadily decrease. When healthy babies are about two to three months old, the immune system will start producing its own antibodies. During this time, the baby will experience the body's natural low point of antibodies in the bloodstream. This is because the maternal antibodies have decreased, and young children, who are making antibodies for the first time, produce them at a much slower rate than adults.
Once healthy babies reach six months of age, their antibodies are produced at a normal rate.

JUST MAKE SURE THAT THE VACCINE DOES NOT CONTAIN MERCURY

Other names for mercury

Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that is found in many consumer and medical products.
Mercurochrome
Merthiolate
Mercurothiolate
Thiomersalate
Thiomersalan
Merzonin
Mertorgan
Merfamin
Thiomersal

Other Names for Mercury Products
Sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate
[(o-carboxyphenyl)thio] Ethylmercury sodium salt
Ethyl (2-mercaptobenzoato-S) mercury sodium salt

[ThePythonicCow]

JUST MAKE SURE THAT THE VACCINE DOES NOT CONTAIN MERCURY
Arrgh - I hate the word "just" :). It suggests that that's all you need to do.

No ... If it were my child, or myself, I would not just avoid the mercury, but I would also avoid the aluminum, squalene, MSG, various milk, egg and other animal proteins, formaldehyde, antibiotics, viruses and who knows what else. Even the "main" ingredient of a "successful" vaccine is in doubt, as it interferes with the natural development of a child's immune system.

[Siberia9]

Just in case anyone hasnt seen the new vaccine video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UioC6ARoLEM&feature=player_embedded btw it will cure you of wanting any vaccines if youre still not sure. The ending has some abortion stuff that they probably should have left out but anyway. Also here is a shorter one for the lazy where the witch Dr admits to putting cancer virus etc in the vaccines.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvsXrVkjyz4

[TigaHawk]

Thanks for posting about this jackovesk!

Anyone else see the irony in the fact that they'll NEVER do a study from within the schools to display numbers of children whom have got whooping cough that have been vaccinated against those that have not?

Considering how hard it is to get your'e child into a kindergarden and school without having fought one hell of a long/hard battle with the school/medical "authorities" if they have not been vaccinated, isnt it amazing how they're going on about an outbreak?

Vaccines bypass alot of the body's main defence systems as well, comprimising the body's natural defences and hitting it hard with a full blown dose of an infection, needless to also point out the effects of mercury, and the other nasties on the very young and still developing brain.

Targeting the people that need the benefits from the governments is 100% not cool. Especialy not cool as because of the vaccines the child will probably need a lifetime of medical help to counter the immume system disorders the child is more than likeyl to get because with alot of vaccines, they are NOT EVEN TESTED. Your'e child getting the jab IS THE TEST. And just remember, NO LIABILITY for anyone.

Similar to a move the government made some time ago that rewarded mother's with a $7000 cheque if they were to have a child, which resulted in alot of young, idiotic school children getting pregnant just for the money.

[onawah]

Here are those links, embedded.
UioC6ARoLEM
UioC6ARoLEM
I would just add that although the voice of Dr. Hilleman is heard in the video, you cannot actually see him saying the words. That was not always the case, as the original video DID show you his face while he was speaking, so that there could be no doubt it was him speaking. That video was removed. If anyone has a copy of that video, it would be great to get it back out on the Web, because the accusation has been made (of course) to discredit the video and claim it is a hoax. I can testify, it is not, because I saw the original video.

Just in case anyone hasnt seen the new vaccine video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UioC6ARoLEM&feature=player_embedded btw it will cure you of wanting any vaccines if youre still not sure. The ending has some abortion stuff that they probably should have left out but anyway. Also here is a shorter one for the lazy where the witch Dr admits to putting cancer virus etc in the vaccines.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvsXrVkjyz4

[haibane]

So who has liability for anything that goes wrong?

What are you talking about? LIABILITY? No liability will make your child any less dead or paralysed, even if they bury you under a pile of cash, even if the money isn't counterfeit. Now that's been clearly shown what the vaccines can do, unless the manufacturers and/or govt's prove beyond doubt they're safe there's no more to talk about, IMHO. Your children aren't a property for someone to be liable for in case of damage.

[Lord Sidious]

So who has liability for anything that goes wrong?

What are you talking about? LIABILITY? No liability will make your child any less dead or paralysed, even if they bury you under a pile of cash, even if the money isn't counterfeit. Now that's been clearly shown what the vaccines can do, unless the manufacturers and/or govt's prove beyond doubt they're safe there's no more to talk about, IMHO. Your children aren't a property for someone to be liable for in case of damage.

You missed my point.
If someone is shown to have the liability themselves, they are far more likely to leave you be and go and annoy someone else.
Someone that doesn't have a clue.

[haibane]

Okay, point taken (^__^ )