PDA

View Full Version : Two Diamonds Linked by Strange Quantum Entanglement



buckminster fuller
2nd December 2011, 10:43
Scientists have linked two diamonds in a mysterious process called entanglement that is normally only seen on the quantum scale.

Entanglement (http://www.livescience.com/2785-spooky-physics-signals-travel-faster-light.html) is so weird that Einstein dubbed it "spooky action at a distance." (http://www.livescience.com/5499-einsteins-spooky-physics-entangled.html) It's a strange effect where one object gets connected to another so that even if they are separated by large distances, an action performed on one will affect the other. Entanglement usually occurs with subatomic particles, and was predicted by the theory of quantum mechanics (http://www.livescience.com/7547-quantum-physics-power-future.html), which governs the realm of the very small.

But now physicists have succeeded in entangling two macroscopic diamonds, demonstrating that quantum mechanical effects are not limited to the microscopic scale.

"I think it's an important step into a new regime of thinking about quantum phenomena," physicist Ian Walmsley of England's University of Oxford said."That is, in this regime of the bigger world, room temperatures, ambient conditions. Although the phenomenon was expected to exist, actually being able to observe it in such a system we think is quite exciting." [Twisted Physics: 7 Mind-Blowing Findings] (http://www.livescience.com/12910-twisted-physics-top-findings.html)


Another study recently used quantum entanglement to teleport bits of light (http://www.livescience.com/13715-teleportation-schrodingers-cat-quantum-light.html) from one place to another. And other researchers have succeeded in entangling macroscopic objects before, but they have generally been under special circumstances, prepared in special ways, and cooled to cryogenic temperatures. In the new achievement, the diamonds were large and not prepared in any special way, the researchers said.

"It's big enough you can see it," Walmsley told LiveScience of the diamonds."They're sitting on the table, out in plain view. The laboratory isn't particularly cold or particularly hot, it's just your everyday room."

Walmsley, along with a team of physicists led by Oxford graduate student Ka Chung Lee, accomplished this feat by entangling the vibration of two diamond crystals. To do so, the researchers set up an apparatus to send a laser pulse at both diamonds simultaneously. Sometimes, the laser light changed color, to a lower frequency, after hitting the diamonds. That told the scientists it had lost a bit of energy.

Because energy must be conserved in closed systems (where there's no input of outside energy), the researchers knew that the "lost" energy had been used in some way. In fact, the energy had been converted into vibrational motion for one of the diamonds (albeit motion that is too small to observe visually). However, the scientists had no way of knowing which diamond was vibrating.

Then, the researchers sent a second pulse of laser light through the now-vibrating system. This time, if the light emerged with a color of higher frequency, it meant it had gained the energy back by absorbing it from the diamond, stopping its vibration.

The scientists had set up two separate detectors to measure the laser light — one for each diamond.

If the two diamonds weren't entangled, the researchers would expect each detector to register a changed laser beam about 50 percent of the time. It's similar to tossing a coin, where random chance would lead to heads about half the time and tails the other half the time on average.

Instead, because the two diamonds were linked, they found that one detector measured the change every time, and the other detector never fired. The two diamonds, it seemed, were so connected they reacted as a single entity, rather than two individual objects.

The scientists report their results in the Dec. 2 issue of the journal Science.

"Recent advances in quantum control techniques have allowed entanglement to be observed for physical systems with increasing complexity and separation distance," University of Michigan physicist Luming Duan, who was not involved in the study, wrote in an accompanying essay in the same issue of Science."Lee et al. take an important step in this direction by demonstrating entanglement between oscillation patterns of atoms—phonon modes—of two diamond samples of millimeter size at room temperature, separated by a macroscopic distance of about 15 cm."

In addition to furthering scientists' understanding of entanglement, the research could help develop faster computers called photonic processors, relying on quantum effects (http://www.livescience.com/7399-small-world-quantum-identity-crisis-observed.html), said Oxford physicist Michael Sprague, another team member on the project.

"The long-term goal is that if you can harness the power of quantum phenomena, you can potentially do things more efficiently than is currently possible," Sprague said.


source : http://www.livescience.com/17264-quantum-entanglement-macroscopic-diamonds.html

Pete
2nd December 2011, 11:04
I've heard of something similar regarding two pendulums, one pendulum is left in a box and the other left to operate freely, the isolated pendulum seemed to capture the energy of the out side pendulum and synchronies with it, despite the fact that the outside pendulum required additional energy to keep going.

Cjay
2nd December 2011, 12:37
Very interesting indeed. Seems like we are on the cusp of so many new "discoveries".

NeverMind
2nd December 2011, 13:27
Fascinating.
And essentially the very same phenomenon that poor Jacques Benveniste was researching, which cost him his career (through other people's stupidity).

NeverMind
2nd December 2011, 13:31
Very interesting indeed. Seems like we are on the cusp of so many new "discoveries".

Yes. And we would have been MUCH closer to them if it hadn't been for the stupidity and malice of many "science" professionals in the 1980s and 1990s (and even now, of course).

But the reason I replied to this is something else: I just wish people (in general) would realise NOW that they can do incredible things. Literally, in-credible things.
No need to wait for "validation" from official or unofficial science to open your eyes to the wonder of the cosmos as it really is, and to your own capabilities within it.
LEAD, do not wait.

(Again, I am not referring to you, obviously, or to anyone in particular, but to people in general.)

meeradas
2nd December 2011, 14:37
I just wish people (in general) would realise NOW that they can do incredible things. Literally, in-credible things.
No need to wait for "validation" from official or unofficial science to open your eyes to the wonder of the cosmos as it really is, and to your own capabilities within it.
LEAD, do not wait.

This is the second time this week that i read this.
One was directly addressed to me, in an email i received.
Whoever is able to shoulder my 'residual reluctance' which keeps me from doing so? -
here, please take it, offering it with pleasure!

Thanks for this particular post, NeverMind [your alias might just be the answer]

NeverMind
2nd December 2011, 14:45
I just wish people (in general) would realise NOW that they can do incredible things. Literally, in-credible things.
No need to wait for "validation" from official or unofficial science to open your eyes to the wonder of the cosmos as it really is, and to your own capabilities within it.
LEAD, do not wait.

This is the second time this week that i read this.
One was directly addressed to me, in an email i received.
Whoever is able to shoulder my 'residual reluctance' which keeps me from doing so? -
here, please take it, offering it with pleasure!

Thanks for this particular post, NeverMind [your alias might just be the answer]



My pleasure. And believe me, a pleasure it is. :)

Somebody clearly is trying to tell you something.
Never mind who it is, or what the circumstances are. :-)

toad
2nd December 2011, 15:22
Kinda old, I believe this experiment was conducted in early 2009. All though its a great experiment and entanglement is a fascinating proposition.

buckminster fuller
2nd December 2011, 15:35
Kinda old, I believe this experiment was conducted in early 2009. All though its a great experiment and entanglement is a fascinating proposition.

Nope, it's new. Past experiments about entanglement or "teleportation of information" were done at particle level. This is a macroscale quantum effect...

toad
2nd December 2011, 15:58
Kinda old, I believe this experiment was conducted in early 2009. All though its a great experiment and entanglement is a fascinating proposition.

Nope, it's new. Past experiments about entanglement or "teleportation of information" were done at particle level. This is a macroscale quantum effect...

Yeah you seem to be correct, I was confusing this with past experiments relating to Qubits.

Seikou-Kishi
2nd December 2011, 16:04
In theories of magic, there is the principle of contagion, which states that two objects having been in contact remain in contact (I think it was Sir James Frazier in the Golden Bough who first expressed this principle). It seems that somehow the rustic country folk were a little ahead of their time if it was a foreshadowing of quantum-physical knowledge.

buckminster fuller
2nd December 2011, 16:06
In theories of magic, there is the principle of contagion, which states that two objects having been in contact remain in contact (I think it was Sir James Frazier in the Golden Bough who first expressed this principle). It seems that somehow the rustic country folk were a little ahead of their time if it was a foreshadowing of quantum-physical knowledge.

In quantum theory, everything is entangled to everything since it emanates from the same energy source from the "big bang". Each and every sub-atomic particle is meant to be entangled to the rest of the universe...

conk
2nd December 2011, 16:50
Doesn't this prove that religions are myths? That there is nothing separate from anything else? That there is no up there and down here?

NeverMind
2nd December 2011, 17:29
Doesn't this prove that religions are myths? That there is nothing separate from anything else? That there is no up there and down here?

Only according to James Frazier (and many of his peers). Who, with all due respect, was a man of his time, no less and certainly no more -- a man of a time that was the intellectual and "spiritual" descendant of the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution and other phenomena that led to scientism as it is still known today.
A time not particularly well equipped for profound insights on humankind and its history.

noprophet
2nd December 2011, 17:38
Whenever I read about entanglement I can't help but think of the old kabalist axiom(?): "things that are alike are the same."

TargeT
2nd December 2011, 20:15
Hmm... Internet with NO bandwith limits and little to no latency... instant wireless communication... no need for bulky expensive infrastructure...

this would change my industry drastically