PDA

View Full Version : Suffolk Co. NY to hear proposal to ban chemtrails



T Smith
6th December 2011, 23:57
Suffolk Co. NY to hear proposal to ban chemtrails

On Dec. 6, New York’s Suffolk County government will hold a public hearing on a proposal to ban aerial spraying of aluminum oxide, barium, sulfur, and other salts into the air over the county without first filing an Environmental Impact Statement with and receiving approval from the county’s Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality.


Exempted from the proposed ban are aerosol spraying operations for agriculture, and for lyme disease, Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE), West Nile virus (WNV), and other disease vector control operations.

The hearing will be held at the Riverhead Legislative Auditorium, Evans K. Griffing Building, 300 Center Drive in Riverhead, NY at 2:30 pm.

If the public is able to convince legislators of the risk from such geoengineering operations, the legislation will then be voted on at the Dec. 20th session. Otherwise, the proposed ban will be tabled indefinitely.

Initiated by Cindy Pikoulas and her husband Jim, along with Siobhan Ciresi of Long Island Sky Watch (LISW), with the assistance of chemtrail opponent Rosalind Peterson of Agriculture Defense Coalition, the bill was finalized and proposed by legislator Edward P. Romaine (1st District). (Full text below.)

Involved in Suffolk County government since 1989, Romaine is a fiscal conservative who prioritizes saving farmland and protecting the environment. In August, he organized Long Island’s first countywide farmers market, along with the Long Island Farm Bureau.

Romaine has represented the 1st District (eastern end of Long Island) continuously since 2005. He serves on the Environment, Planning & Agriculture Committee, which voted on Nov. 28 to submit the proposed law banning such aerial spraying to a public hearing.

The Piloulases and Ciresi will speak on Dec. 6 and are urging people to “pack the hearing” to show support for the ban.

“If this proposal becomes law in Suffolk County, Long Island, it would be the first in the nation. It would be a starting point for others to follow,” said LISW in a press release.

“Eventually, our governments would have to investigate why our trees are dying in record numbers; why our waters contain toxic levels of aluminum, barium and strontium; why 90% of us are vitamin D deficient; why our crops are failing; and where all of this crazy weather is coming from.”

Cindy Pikoulas of LISW spoke with New York Sky Watch radio on Nov. 20, when she advised that tree samples from Suffolk show high levels of barium, strontium and aluminum. She is asking Long Islanders to have their water and trees tested for these chemicals in order to build a body of evidence that would spur investigations by health and environment authorities.

In addition to attending the Dec. 6 hearing, Long Islanders can contact their county legislators via http://legis.suffolkcountyny.gov/legislators.html

Are Exemptions Necessary?

Though exempted under the proposed ban, disease vector spraying may be a subterfuge for weather control operations, given the extreme rarity of EEV and WNV. According to the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services:

“Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is a rare but serious viral disease caused by a virus transmitted by the bite of an infected mosquito with more severe symptoms than for West Nile virus. EEE is an arbovirus (short for arthropod-borne, meaning spread by insects). Birds are the source of infection for mosquitoes, which can sometimes transmit the infection to horses, other animals, and, in rare cases, people.

“West Nile Virus (WNV) was first seen in the US in 1999, in the New York City area of Queens. WNV can live in a number of types of birds and is passed bird to bird by certain types of mosquitoes. Occasionally, an infected mosquito will pass the virus to humans or other animals. Most healthy people do not get sick from the virus, but sometimes it may cause symptoms.”

Per the US Geological Survey, two horses caught WNV in 2011 and 12 caught EEE, none of them in Suffolk. Of humans, 43 contracted WNV in New York State in 2011, four of them in Suffolk County. Only one person contracted EEE in the entire state.

Of the other vector-borne diseases of concern to health authorities – St Louis Encephalitis, La Crosse Encephalitis, Powassan Virus, and locally-acquired Dengue Fever – no New Yorkers contracted any of them in 2011. (But 40 New Yorkers did contract Dengue Fever when traveling outside the US in 2011.)

Considering that the population of NYS is 19 million, the application of toxic chemicals purportedly to control for such rare vector-borne diseases where only 44 people became ill in 2011 seems absurd.

US health officials admit that Ugandans and Egyptians, where WNV was first discovered, develop a natural immunity before reaching adulthood. Using toxic chemicals that pollute the environment, leading to cancer and respiratory diseases, instead of allowing humans to develop immunity to such diseases, is an unsustainable and irresponsible control method.

Whether these vector control spray programs are involved in other activities such as solar radiation or rainfall management is uncertain. But, in addition to the obvious jets laying chemtrails at 30,000 feet, they may be involved in contributing to the high levels of aluminum, barium and strontium found in Suffolk waters and trees.


Below is the full text of Suffolk’s proposed legislation:


WHEREAS, there was duly presented and introduced to this County Legislature at a meeting held on [December 6], 2011, a proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO PROTECT AIR QUALITY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY" now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that said local law be enacted in form as follows:

LOCAL LAW NO. _____-2011, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK

A LOCAL LAW TO PROTECT AIR QUALITY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, as follows:

Section 1. Legislative Intent.

This Legislature hereby finds and determines that Suffolk County is a leader in environmental protection and has several programs to protect soil and groundwater from contamination.

This Legislature also finds and determines that air pollution is another environmental issue that can impact the health and safety of County residents and may also contaminate soil and groundwater.

This Legislature further finds and determines that concerns have been raised that business and government entities may be discharging polluting chemicals, including barium, sulfur, salts, and aluminum oxide, into the air, which may impact weather and other environmental elements.

This Legislature finds that such particulates eventually fall from the atmosphere, exposing the public to these air pollutants and, upon landing, may contaminate soil and water.

This Legislature determines that County residents may be exposed to these chemicals while they are in the atmosphere, which can cause respiratory and other health problems.

This Legislature also finds that, to protect County residents from potential harm, any person who plans to discharge these chemicals into the airspace over Suffolk County should first file an Environmental Impact Statement with and receive approval from the Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality.

Therefore, the purpose of this law is to require any person who plans to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk to file a complete Environmental Impact Statement with the County prior to taking such action.

Section 2. Definitions.

As used in this law, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: “PERSON” shall mean any natural person, individual, corporation, unincorporated association, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, joint stock association, or other entity or business of any kind.

Section 3. Requirements.

Any person who plans to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk must file a completed environmental impact form, as established in Section 4 of this law, with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality and with the Clerk of the Suffolk County Legislature and receive the approval of the Division of Environmental Quality prior to engaging in such discharge.

Section 4. Form Established.

The Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to develop an environmental impact form to be used by persons wishing to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk. Such form shall require applicants to detail the nature and purpose of their proposed discharge and any potential environmental and/or public health impacts that may result from such discharge.

Section 5. Exemption.

The requirements set forth in this law shall not apply to any person engaging in aerosol spraying for agricultural or vector control purposes.

Section 6. Penalties.

A. Any person who violates any provision of this law shall be liable for a civil penalty of up to $2,500 for an initial violation, with a fine of $5,000 for each subsequent violation.

B. Any civil penalty may only be assessed by the Commissioner of Health Services following a hearing and opportunity for an alleged violator to be heard.

Section 7. Rules and Regulations.

The Commissioner of the County Department of Health Services is hereby authorized and empowered to issue and promulgate such rules and regulations as he or she deems necessary to implement and carry out the provisions of this law. Section 8. Applicability.

This law shall apply to all actions occurring on or after the effective date of this law.

Section 9. Severability.

If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law or the application thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law, or in its application to the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance directly involved in the controversy in which such order or judgment shall be rendered.

Section 10. SEQRA Determination.

This Legislature, being the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) lead agency, hereby finds and determines that this law constitutes a Type II action pursuant to Section 617.5(c)(20), (21), and/or (27) of Title 6 of the NEW YORK CODE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS (6 NYCRR) and within the meaning of Section 8-0109(2) of the NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW as a promulgation of regulations, rules, policies, procedures, and legislative decisions in connection with continuing agency administration, management and information collection. The Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is hereby directed to circulate any appropriate SEQRA notices of determination of non-applicability or non-significance in accordance with this law.

Section 11. Effective Date.

This law shall take effect immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27866

cloud9
7th December 2011, 00:16
OMG! I live in Suffolk County... I didn't know about it

WhiteFeather
7th December 2011, 00:36
I'm not far from Suffolk, I did not here of this as well. Great Post.

I Would Love To Buy Lord Sid a round trip ticket to NY and appear in court. He would be one Helluva CourtNugget here.

This statement is Fishy!!!!
"Exempted from the proposed ban are aerosol spraying operations for agriculture, and for lyme disease, Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE), West Nile virus (WNV), and other disease vector control operations."

Sounds Like A Loophole To Me!

Vitalux
7th December 2011, 00:44
It will be interesting to witness the outcome of this.

In Durham Region (Ontario Canada) recently they had some public meetings and the region was going to investigate rather to remove sodium fluoride from the public municipal water supply. Even thought there was a public outcry to stop putting sodium fluoride in the drinking water, the Region of Durham elected to continue putting the poison in the drinking water systems stating that it was good for people's teeth.

I really hope that the good folks in Suffolk Co. NY win their bid to have the chem trails stop, however my fear is that the meeting will just be a bunch of smoking mirrors.

however i applaud their ambition to have it stopped and I am proud to see that at least someone has courage to try and have it stopped.

T Smith
7th December 2011, 00:48
OMG! I live in Suffolk County... I didn't know about it

I also live in Suffolk County... I just found out about this yesterday, so I drove out to Riverhead. I was hoping to speak, but there wasn't a chance. No matter, those who did speak left no rock unturned, from the dry facts to testimony from the grandson of a Holocaust survivor who drew parallels, on record, to the Nazi eugenics campaign to the current geofascist agenda afoot in the skies. The mood of the people was clear and they stood and applauded every single speaker. The auditorium was packed with people, experts, professionals, etc. Very passionate testimony and very thorough documentation. Some came from Europe and from all over to speak to the legislative body. I actually recorded some of it on my iphone before my battery died... if I can get to it I will try to post some of the hearing here.

It was truly amazing and surreal to see a grassroots group confront the globalist agenda in the light of day, on the record, without apologizing for it or mincing words or dancing around delicate implications. The energy in that auditorium was intense, and every single person in that room understood the gravity and importance of that hearing and knew an unpleasant and long-overdue truth was rearing its head. If the Suffolk county legislators do the right thing and vote yes on this (I can't see how they can't given the presentation at the hearing) it will certainly put Suffolk County on the map...

One got the feeling, after walking out of the auditorium and mingling with all the various experts and activists in the lobby, that he/she had just participated in a historic event, and potentially, was a part of a very important precedent.

WhiteFeather
7th December 2011, 00:55
OMG! I live in Suffolk County... I didn't know about it

I also live in Suffolk County... I just found out about this yesterday, so I drove out to Riverhead. I was hoping to speak, but there wasn't a chance. No matter, those who did speak left no rock unturned, from the dry facts to testimony from the grandson of a Holocaust survivor who drew parallels, on record, to the Nazi eugenics campaign to the current geofascist agenda afoot in the skies. The mood of the people was clear and they stood and applauded every single speaker. The auditorium was packed with people, experts, professionals, etc. Very passionate testimony and very thorough documentation. Some came from Europe and from all over to speak to the legislative body. I actually recorded some of it on my iphone before my battery died... if I can get to it I will try to post some of the hearing here.

It was truly amazing and surreal to see a grassroots group confront the globalist agenda in the light of day, on the record, without apologizing for it or mincing words or dancing around delicate implications. The energy in that auditorium was intense, and every single person in that room understood the gravity and importance of that hearing and knew an unpleasant and long-overdue truth was rearing it's head. If the Suffolk county legislators do the right thing and vote yes on this (I can't see how they can't given the presentation at the hearing) it will certainly put Suffolk County on the map...

One got the feeling, after walking out of the auditorium and mingling with all the various experts and activists in the lobby, that he/she had just participated in a historic event, and potentially, was a part of a very important precedent.

Standing Ovation. WOW. Right Here In MY Own State. Nice
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y29/milquetoast___/applaud.gif

T Smith
7th December 2011, 00:56
It will be interesting to witness the outcome of this.

In Durham Region (Ontario Canada) recently they had some public meetings and the region was going to investigate rather to remove sodium fluoride from the public municipal water supply. Even thought there was a public outcry to stop putting sodium fluoride in the drinking water, the Region of Durham elected to continue putting the poison in the drinking water systems stating that it was good for people's teeth.

I really hope that the good folks in Suffolk Co. NY win their bid to have the chem trails stop, however my fear is that the meeting will just be a bunch of smoking mirrors.

however i applaud their ambition to have it stopped and I am proud to see that at least someone has courage to try and have it stopped.

You may be right about this. But if they vote NO it will be purely on account of cowardice on the part of the legislators; there is not a chance it will be because the evidence was controversial or inconclusive. Every single person in that auditorium knew what was being said was true, albeit inconveniently so, perhaps, for those who are now forced to vote on the matter.

Anchor
7th December 2011, 01:00
OMG! I live in Suffolk County... I didn't know about it

I also live in Suffolk County... I just found out about this yesterday, so I drove out to Riverhead. I was hoping to speak, but there wasn't a chance. No matter, those who did speak left no rock unturned, from the dry facts to testimony from the grandson of a Holocaust survivor who drew parallels, on record, to the Nazi eugenics campaign to the current geofascist agenda afoot in the skies. The mood of the people was clear and they stood and applauded every single speaker. The auditorium was packed with people, experts, professionals, etc. Very passionate testimony and very thorough documentation. Some came from Europe and from all over to speak to the legislative body. I actually recorded some of it on my iphone before my battery died... if I can get to it I will try to post some of the hearing here.

It was truly amazing and surreal to see a grassroots group confront the globalist agenda in the light of day, on the record, without apologizing for it or mincing words or dancing around delicate implications. The energy in that auditorium was intense, and every single person in that room understood the gravity and importance of that hearing and knew an unpleasant and long-overdue truth was rearing it's head. If the Suffolk county legislators do the right thing and vote yes on this (I can't see how they can't given the presentation at the hearing) it will certainly put Suffolk County on the map...

One got the feeling, after walking out of the auditorium and mingling with all the various experts and activists in the lobby, that he/she had just participated in a historic event, and potentially, was a part of a very important precedent.

Thankyou for going

Thankyou for the first hand report

Muchos Kudos!

John..

onawah
7th December 2011, 01:42
I look forward to hearing the results on this.
It seems to me that the real question is whether local governments really have any power to stop what the black ops are doing locally, even if the legislators vote for regulating the Chemtrails in their region.
I read on another thread about Chemtrails that one of the purposes is for protecting the functioning of super-conductors, which are very key to black op weaponry, among other technologies.
Carmody would probably be the one to know more about that, or would know how to find out.
Hoping for the very best outcome on this!
We SO need an effective way to stop this systematic poisoning of our planet SOON.

T Smith
7th December 2011, 02:13
I look forward to hearing the results on this.
It seems to me that the real question is whether local governments really have any power to stop what the black ops are doing locally, even if the legislators vote for regulating the Chemtrails in their region.
I read on another thread about Chemtrails that one of the purposes is for protecting the functioning of super-conductors, which are very key to black op weaponry, among other technologies.
Carmody would probably be the one to know more about that, or would know how to find out.
Hoping for the very best outcome on this!
We SO need an effective way to stop this systematic poisoning of our planet SOON.

It would seem to me that no one, including the legislators, are deluding themselves to believe this legislation will actually thwart a global black-ops campaign. In a lot of ways, it reminds me of the 1954 public decree by the small Southern Rhône village of Châteauneuf du Pape to forbid flying saucers from landing in the vineyards.

Passing the legislation, however, is at least acknowledging the problem, on the record. A first step to increasing public awareness and acceptance of the problem, a necessary prerequisite to effectively combating the problem.

onawah
7th December 2011, 02:36
Agreed. The amount of effort involved in these small, grass roots endeavors is prodigious, and though they may not achieve the goals as stated on the surface, just the willingness and the heart that it takes to get that far creates plenty of positive ripples in the "Force" and the effects are far reaching, if not always obvious.

onawah
7th December 2011, 21:51
Geoengineering Planet's Weather: A Warning From Scientists About Using Chemicals In The Sky
http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu/Releases/?releaseID=1224

Monday, December 5, 2011

If It Comes to It...

Researchers at Scripps and colleagues argue that geoengineering responses to climate change need to assess ecosystem impacts before being tried

Scripps Institution of Oceanography / University of California, San Diego
If the world must resort to geoengineering as a means of mitigating dangerous effects of anthropogenic climate change, how well would it understand what it is getting itself into?

Since Nobel Prize-winning physicist Paul Crutzen, formerly a researcher at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, lent credence to the idea of conducting large-scale efforts to influence Earth's climate systems in a 2006 essay in the journal Climatic Change, research centers have explored the feasibility of various techniques. While the logistics of mitigation efforts and their ethical considerations have been widely discussed, a basic analysis of how geoengineering projects could affect ecosystems has lagged, said Lynn Russell, a professor of atmospheric chemistry at Scripps.

At the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting (U44B-03· Thursday, Dec. 8, 4:30-4:45 p.m. · Moscone South Room 104), Russell and others will discuss a report on two broad categories of geoengineering strategies that have recently been advanced. The panelists were all participants in a geoengineering workshop hosted by Scripps in January 2011 from which the report was produced. The panel will also discuss what it will take to assess the feasibility of mitigation methods, especially in regard to their potential to benefit or damage ecosystems.

"Because research on this topic is just beginning, our report summarizes what is known, but also suggests the type of research that will be necessary to answer the questions we posed," said the panelists.

Sunlight reflection methods are one of the two categories. They generally involve attempts to reflect more sunlight back into space, therefore diverting that heat energy away from Earth's surface. The workshop report has assessed the relative merits and risks of sunlight reflection methods, one of which involves reflective aerosols introduced into the upper reaches of the atmosphere. Such methods could entail efforts that require a great deal of manpower from multiple countries.
The use of aerosols to artificially enhance Earth's albedo, or brightness, is one of the main geoengineering strategies that has been considered by scientists. Image: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio

The use of aerosols to artificially enhance Earth's albedo, or brightness, is one of the main geoengineering strategies that has been considered by scientists. Image: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio


Russell notes, as an example of what could go wrong, that if such efforts were initiated and then stopped for whatever reason, the sudden reversion to less sun reflection could do more harm than good to ecosystems.

"If you stopped the efforts, climate change would occur much more rapidly. There would be less time for ecosystems to react," said Russell. "The hope would be that the report would make the community aware of these open questions and that people pursue these questions individually and collaboratively," Russell added.

The other category of geoengineering considered by Russell and her colleagues, carbon dioxide removal, requires a similar thinking-through of potential unwanted catastrophic consequences.

The publication of Crutzen's essay is cited by many as the moment when geoengineering became a legitimate topic, said co-panelist Margaret Leinen, executive director of the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute in Fort Pierce, Fla. Leinen has assessed a geoengineering technique that accelerates carbon dioxide removal by fertilizing oceans with iron or other micronutrients for phytoplankton, a technique widely discussed, though evidence of its consequences remains fraught with uncertainty. She noted that geoengineering has been the subject of three Congressional hearings and discussed in Britain's parliament since the essay appeared. As serious consideration spreads, however, workshops like that held at Scripps are necessary to ensure that ecosystem risk/reward analyses take place as these strategies are studied, she said.

"People have been talking about very substantial geoengineering field tests. We're saying that as you consider all of this, you need to include in your planning ways to study ecological consequences at the same time that you study the techniques," Leinen said.

# # #

Note to broadcast and cable producers: University of California, San Diego provides an on-campus satellite uplink facility for live or pre-recorded television interviews. Please phone or e-mail the media contact listed above to arrange an interview.

About Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Scripps Institution of Oceanography at University of California, San Diego, is one of the oldest, largest and most important centers for global science research and education in the world. Now in its second century of discovery, the scientific scope of the institution has grown to include biological, physical, chemical, geological, geophysical and atmospheric studies of the earth as a system. Hundreds of research programs covering a wide range of scientific areas are under way today in 65 countries. The institution has a staff of about 1,400, and annual expenditures of approximately $170 million from federal, state and private sources. Scripps operates robotic networks, and one of the largest U.S. academic fleets with four oceanographic research ships and one research platform for worldwide exploration. Birch Aquarium at Scripps serves as the interpretive center of the institution and showcases Scripps research and a diverse array of marine life through exhibits and programming for more than 415,000 visitors each year. Learn more at scripps.ucsd.edu.

T Smith
9th December 2011, 23:42
Here it is:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz1wt2kKRY4&feature=channel_video_title


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8hC6A0JQJU&feature=relmfu


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsLknBeyOno&feature=relmfu


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy_gU2C1nbk&feature=related

onawah
9th December 2011, 23:58
Can you sum it up for those of us who don't have time to watch the entire proceedings, T Smith?
Thanks!

WhiteFeather
10th December 2011, 00:12
Watching it now, My Gratitude....BTW They sprayed like HELL here in NY All Day Today.

Q. Did Rosalind Peterson show up for this hearing?

T Smith
10th December 2011, 00:25
Can you sum it up for those of us who don't have time to watch the entire proceedings, T Smith?
Thanks!

Sure. I'll just copy my summary from earlier in this thread:

I also live in Suffolk County... I just found out about this yesterday, so I drove out to Riverhead. I was hoping to speak, but there wasn't a chance. No matter, those who did speak left no rock unturned, from the dry facts to testimony from the grandson of a Holocaust survivor who drew parallels, on record, to the Nazi eugenics campaign to the current geofascist agenda afoot in the skies. The mood of the people was clear and they stood and applauded every single speaker. The auditorium was packed with people, experts, professionals, etc. Very passionate testimony and very thorough documentation. Some came from Europe and from all over to speak to the legislative body. I actually recorded some of it on my iphone before my battery died... if I can get to it I will try to post some of the hearing here.

It was truly amazing and surreal to see a grassroots group confront the globalist agenda in the light of day, on the record, without apologizing for it or mincing words or dancing around delicate implications. The energy in that auditorium was intense, and every single person in that room understood the gravity and importance of that hearing and knew an unpleasant and long-overdue truth was rearing its head. If the Suffolk county legislators do the right thing and vote yes on this (I can't see how they can't given the presentation at the hearing) it will certainly put Suffolk County on the map...

One got the feeling, after walking out of the auditorium and mingling with all the various experts and activists in the lobby, that he/she had just participated in a historic event, and potentially, was a part of a very important precedent.

I believe the first vote on this is Dec. 15th....

onawah
10th December 2011, 02:50
Hopefully, if this is successful, it will set a precedent for many other communities.
Please keep us informed.
Thanks!

WhiteFeather
13th December 2011, 23:51
I posted this video to my Facebook page today. Getting the word out, maybe someone will wake up. It needs to go viral on Facebook Peeps, because that's where the many sleepers dwell.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Oz1wt2kKRY4

pyrangello
14th December 2011, 15:15
I was in detroit yesterday and for 30 minutes the sky cleared only to see the chemtrails, most I have ever seen in the sky at one time, in 15 minutes they all meshed together and nothing was defined. Coast to Coast radio just did an interview a week ago with a guy detailing whats going on , I'll try and find the link and post it. Keep it going as our efforts will continue to gain ground.