View Full Version : Why would benevolent E.T.'s shoot down the Shuttle Columbia?
truth4me
13th December 2011, 17:18
Now let's say benevolent E.T.'s shot down the Columbia. The question would be why? If they are benevolent then would they kill 7 to save hundreds of thousands? What if the 7 aboard weren't kill and were beamed up to the benevolent E.T. space craft?
Was the Columbia more then a space shuttle? Was it really a nuclear bomb carrying shuttle who's job it was to drop a bomb on Iraq at the time?
Could the E.T's have disarmed the nuclear weapon earlier in the mission and wanted to prove a point to TPTB by using advanced weapons on the craft to let them know AGAIN about trying to use nuclear weapons from space?
Last but not least would our government lie to us thru the media about what really happened?:decision:
Article to see this information is located at fourwinds10.com
"Hello Central,What is the true story behind the Columbia Disaster........"
jackovesk
13th December 2011, 17:25
Now let's say benevolent E.T.'s shot down the Columbia. The question would be why? If they are benevolent then would they kill 7 to save hundreds of thousands? What if the 7 aboard weren't kill and were beamed up to the benevolent E.T. space craft?
Was the Columbia more then a space shuttle? Was it really a nuclear bomb carrying shuttle who's job it was to drop a bomb on Iraq at the time?
Could the E.T's have disarmed the nuclear weapon earlier in the mission and wanted to prove a point to TPTB by using advanced weapons on the craft to let them know AGAIN about trying to use nuclear weapons from space?
Last but not least would our government lie to us thru the media about what really happened?:decision:
Awaiting article and link :)
Rgs,
Jack
alienHunter
13th December 2011, 17:50
:(
Now let's say benevolent E.T.'s shot down the Columbia. The question would be why? If they are benevolent then would they kill 7 to save hundreds of thousands? What if the 7 aboard weren't kill and were beamed up to the benevolent E.T. space craft?
Was the Columbia more then a space shuttle? Was it really a nuclear bomb carrying shuttle who's job it was to drop a bomb on Iraq at the time?
Could the E.T's have disarmed the nuclear weapon earlier in the mission and wanted to prove a point to TPTB by using advanced weapons on the craft to let them know AGAIN about trying to use nuclear weapons from space?
Last but not least would our government lie to us thru the media about what really happened?:decision:
Well, The shuttle did melt...I worked on the software system where the initial problem started. As far as 'beaming' that too is possible. I don't know if the shuttle cockpit recordings were ever released to the general public, but I spoke to people that did hear them and I was told that to listen to the screams of the crew as they quickly gained awareness that they were going to die was an excruciatingly painful experience.:(
Cjay
13th December 2011, 17:57
Why would benevolent E.T.'s shoot down the Shuttle Columbia? IF they did shoot down the shuttle, perhaps they did it because the shuttle's mission was something very bad.
161803398
13th December 2011, 18:20
I live in Canada but my family is in Ireland and England, mostly. Many years ago, you might hear that some Republican had been killed by some Unionist force or vice versa, some unionist has been shot by the IRA. I remember a university professor who supported the IRA was killed and some people were saying that the IRA had killed her. I couldn't understand why people would even think that until someone explained it to me. Basically, its a false flag. I don't know whether in that particular case it was true or not.
I dk why people get the idea there are "benevolent" forces. All forces likely have a point a view and that makes them not very benevolent to someone, maybe not you.
If there are ETs there are probably some who are better than others and with a generally creative and positive mind. But that won't mean that everything they do is neccesarily for human good because they will have their own point of view. Of course, if a kindly ET shows up people will endow her/him with godlike "daddy/mommy" properties. But that would be wrong.
truth4me
13th December 2011, 21:10
I live in Canada but my family is in Ireland and England, mostly. Many years ago, you might hear that some Republican had been killed by some Unionist force or vice versa, some unionist has been shot by the IRA. I remember a university professor who supported the IRA was killed and some people were saying that the IRA had killed her. I couldn't understand why people would even think that until someone explained it to me. Basically, its a false flag. I don't know whether in that particular case it was true or not.
I dk why people get the idea there are "benevolent" forces. All forces likely have a point a view and that makes them not very benevolent to someone, maybe not you.
If there are ETs there are probably some who are better than others and with a generally creative and positive mind. But that won't mean that everything they do is neccesarily for human good because they will have their own point of view. Of course, if a kindly ET shows up people will endow her/him with godlike "daddy/mommy" properties. But that would be wrong.What I'm saying is this. Benevolent ET IMHO will not allow nuclear weapons in space. We already have enough proof that TPTB are followers of Lucifer and maybe the God of the bible is NOT the true CREATOR God of the human races....The crew might not be dead but we were told they were dead by the government controlled media....if a nuclear payload was on that shuttle.....will think about it.....
161803398
13th December 2011, 22:11
But I think they probably think we are dangerous bunch and they aren't necessarily doing it for us. They would be doing it for the protection of the rest of the universe. If we get out of here in our current condition the entire universe is in serious peril.
Look what the American government, Nato, the CIA, the English, the French etc etc are doing to the rest of the world - our own planet. If I was an alien, I'd be very unhappy at the thought of any human being going into space...even a nice one...they might have bad kids. We are in no shape to go anywhere. There is a high level of insanity in our way of thinking and we are not fit to be citizens of earth let alone the galaxy.
DreamsInDigital
14th December 2011, 01:29
More like what I heard was it wasn't Benevolent Aliens that fired on the shuttle. It was the Cabal that exploded it to prevent either the crew or some information from being exposed. But, there were several of the crew members that were transported to the Lunar base. But the american public were told they were dead. There's more details to it, but this is what I can remember from what I read about it.
Mad Hatter
14th December 2011, 01:52
FYI An alternate explanation...
http://the2012scenario.com/2010/05/tom-bearden-how-the-russians-brought-down-the-space-shuttle-challenger/
so to take a shuttle down, what is more likely, demented ET's or demented humans??
Cjay
14th December 2011, 02:00
There's no shortage of demented humans, that's certain!
The media story of the Columbia disaster was a fabrication to hide the Truth. Supposedly surface tiles broke loose causing enough damage to crash the ship. Shuttle and body parts were found scattered across the Texas landscape. How is that possible?
Anyone with even an elemental knowledge of science knows that falling objects from such a high altitude, as that of the Columbia, would burn up from the heat of friction before reaching the earth's surface. Was there a debris field from the Columbia crash? Yes and No! What was found was not from the Columbia. What was found was the "junk" from airplanes and body parts from clones that the U.S. military dumped out in the Texas skies to fool the media and the people.
The Truth is that the Columbia was on a very evil mission, as nearly every U.S. space mission has been over the years. The Columbia was starting one last planetary orbit before landing, contrary to what you were told. On this last orbit the crew of the Columbia had orders to drop a hydrogen bomb on Iraq and wipe it off the face of Earth Shan!
This was not to be permitted, because Creator God Aton of our Nebadon Universe decreed in 1998, that no more nuclear was to be used for evil intent ever again on Earth Shan from that point forward. Thus, the Columbia mission had to be stopped.
Ashtar Command aboard the New Jerusalem Starship was given orders by Aton to "take out" the Columbia. This was done by particle beam technology which disintegrates any form of mass. This explains the "lightening-like discharges that were observed. The Columbia was instantly vaporized, and the seven crew members were "beamed" aboard the New Jerusalem. They are in safety, are attending space cadet classes to learn the Truth about space travel and space technology, and will be returned at some point to bear witness to the lies and the fraud of the U.S. Space Program.
Again the Darkside is trying to launch a new Columbia shuttle mission of evil intent. Are the delays being caused deliberately? What do you think? Will this mission be successful? I shall let you draw your own conclusions. The Darkside is still determined to win and to stop a return to Goodness.
Bits and pieces of Truth slip through the cracks in the lying media. Let us watch carefully to see how history unfolds.
Source: http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/bellringers_corner/hello_central/news.php?q=e197620b3be439be8d49addd30041002
Date: July 15, 2005
alienHunter
14th December 2011, 02:49
I don't remember the exact altitude but it was definitely suborbital when problems began. I do remember they were traveling at about mach 22 in re-entry mode. I think initial re-entry velocity is about Mach 40. The space shuttle craft was obviously designed to withstand extreme conditions chief among them being heat. When the shuttle lost aerodynamic/structural integrity it simply disintegrated amidst all the intense forces and would have course lost all hardened protective qualities but I think a free fall condition would have quickly prevailed which implies a very significant decrease in destructive forces.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.