PDA

View Full Version : US To Invade Costa Rica



Fredkc
7th July 2010, 23:07
....sort of.

It seems there is no place on earth our government won't send troops.
What a monumental waste of our troops, our Int'l standing (whats left of it), and our money!



@ AlterNet (http://blogs.alternet.org/c4ss/2010/07/07/costa-rica-and-drug-war-escalation/)
The Costa Rican government recently agreed to allow up to 46 United States warships and 7,000 Marines into Costa Rican waters. The official reason for this massive projection of power is to combat drug trafficking.

Calling United States drug policy “The War on Drugs” was never an exaggeration. From its beginning, the policy was carried out through the increasing militarization of American police forces. The US government supports the Mexican government’s escalation of the drug war, which has led to an explosion of violence in Mexico that is gradually spilling over into the United States. And now 46 warships and 7,000 Marines are likely to enter the fight in Central America.

[....]

Like any war, the War over Drugs is fought against people, and people are killed. Allegations of selling items the government does not approve of are served with paramilitary police raids. The consequences for police officers who kill people during these home invasions are almost always minimal or non-existent.

Who knows what missions the United States invasion force will eventually undertake in Costa Rica? As instruments of United States government power, they will be ordered to do whatever the dominant faction of government power thinks is in their interests.


Conditions. The U.S. Government's request for authorization of entry of the Marines to Costa Rica was accompanied by a series of conditions to be met by the country so that the ships come.

"The staff of the United States in Costa Rica can enjoy freedom of movement and the right to carry out the activities it deems necessary in carrying out its mission , "said the letter sent to the Security Ministry by the Embassy of the United States June 2.



http://www.insidecostarica.com/dailynews/2010/july/07/costarica10070702.htm
Costa Rica's president, Laura Chinchilla, defended the decision to allow U.S. warships and Marines in Costa Rica's national waters, saying that the authorization is not significantly different than previous authorizations with respect to the cooperation agreement signed a decade ago.

The presidenta said that it is necessary to review the statutes of the agreement, but not to diminish the actions, but rather to make them more effective.

Chinchilla reiterated that the intention of the government is to expand its efforts to fight drug trafficking and arms smuggling and to establish new mechanisms of control.

The presidenta assures that the conventions are the same and that her administration is not making efforts to risk the constitutionality of the country or try to militarize police efforts.
What ??? What on earth would you call it?


More links to this catastrophe:
Military.com (http://www.military.com/news/article/costa-rica-to-allow-us-to-send-troops.html)
Costa Rica Daily (http://www.insidecostarica.com/dailynews/2010/july/07/costarica10070701.htm)
PressTv (http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=133377&sectionid=351020706)

Beth
7th July 2010, 23:18
The Costa Rican government recently agreed to allow up to 46 United States warships and 7,000 Marines into Costa Rican waters. The official reason for this massive projection of power is to combat drug trafficking.

They would go along way with that if they would stop the CIA from doing it.

unplugged
8th July 2010, 02:38
....sort of.

What ??? What on earth would you call it?


Deranged. Crazed. Unsettling. A deflection strategy. Proof the PTB are scrambling with everything they have in hopes of gaining traction.

A farce.

-unplugged

Humble Janitor
8th July 2010, 03:04
I call it another unprecedented waste of taxpayer money.

Lost Soul
8th July 2010, 03:27
I hate drugs and what it does, but at this point let's legalize the stuff. We're broke and can't afford the drug war anymore.

tone3jaguar
8th July 2010, 04:18
They will never legalize because then instead of the CIA making the money from the drugs, the Fed would make it instead on drug taxes. No way the CIA would allow that to happen.

PathWalker
8th July 2010, 05:17
This is not an invasion it is by invitation. Invasion is an hostile act.

3optic
8th July 2010, 05:19
I hate drugs and what it does, but at this point let's legalize the stuff. We're broke and can't afford the drug war anymore.

We can file this under:

"Things to do if The US government ever manifests as anything other than a shadow of it's former self." This has long been the most rational option but too much money is made and it fits nicely with the Fabian plan to demoralize and control the public.

Humble Janitor :

I call it another unprecedented waste of taxpayer money.

Or how about the perfect bait and switch multi profit sourced scam. We pay them to run their criminal network. But yeah waste covers it.

3optic
8th July 2010, 05:30
This is not an invasion it is by invitation. Invasion is an hostile act.

PathWalker, when a decidedly puppet like politician invites US troops into the country, this I suppose could be loosely defined as an invitation but it does not make it wanted or legal.


US warships cause anger in Costa Rica

Costa Rica has allowed 46 US warships and 7,000 Marines to enter the country despite objection by the opposition parties, which describe the move as "illegal."

Costa Rican opposition parties denounced the decision of the Legislative Assembly, describing it as "illegal" and "in violation of national sovereignty," Presna Latina reported Saturday.

The decision grants US troops permission to stay in Costa Rica from July 1 to December 31 to fight drug trafficking.

The Costa Rican government, however, argues that the combat capability of the US warships, helicopters and marines is disproportionate to the threat caused by drug trafficking.

The permission is tantamount "to giving a blank check" to the US forces, Luis Fishman, deputy of the Unidad Social Cristiana said.

"We cannot support an illegal act, we won't allow the Constitution to be broken," Fishman added.

Frente Amplio legislator Jose Maria Villalta expressed his opposition to the decision, saying it allows US troops to "enjoy freedom of movement and the right to carry out the activities needed to fulfill their mission."

The legislator also said Washington views the region part of its sphere of influence where it seeks to adopt a "strategy of complete dominance."

Opposition parties have not ruled out the possibility of taking action against the decision as they say it violates an agreement reached a decade ago with Washington that only allows the entry of coast guard vessels -- not warships -- into the country.

-Press TV

Bill Ryan
12th July 2010, 01:04
-------------------

Kerry has posted this "Letter from an Australian Source" on her blog (7 July):

http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html

Operator
12th July 2010, 01:27
Hi Bill,

I've read that article on Kerry's blog today ... What do you make of it ? Why Costa Rica ? Any ideas ?
Of course there is a particular part in that article that could be of special interest to me: "... and down to below Panama as well ..." this means the entire Caribbean
could be included and that's my front doorstep ...

Cheers, Op.

Beth
12th July 2010, 02:09
Hi Bill,

I've read that article on Kerry's blog today ... What do you make of it ? Why Costa Rica ? Any ideas ?


I'd like to know what he thinks of it as well since I found it a bit cryptic and have no idea what direction he's going with it.

Operator
12th July 2010, 02:52
Well, strategical positioning comes to mind ...

One would think that it's not such a good idea to dislocate more and more US troops ... unless of course you have a VERY GOOD REASON to do so.
I found this article (http://www.welovecostarica.com/public/46_US_Warships_Plus_7000_US_Marines_On_Route_To_Costa_Rica.cfm).

At point 7 the author suggests that something similar as on Kerry's blog might be the case. At least it is clear from the article that people from Costa
Rica itself do not completely understand this move.

If the author from the article in Kerry's blog is right then Costa Rica will not be south enough since he/she mentions Panama which is even further south.

MariaDine
12th July 2010, 03:46
An earthquake of 5,9 p Richter in Costa Rica - thursday 20, (USGS).

The institut informs that the quake to place at 16h16 LT , 67 km from the capital, San José, and 38 km deep.

Reports - no damage, no victims.

Soon after the quake, USGS informed that the magnitude would be of 6,3, revising it after to be 6,2, and finally 5,9.

A brasilian delegation with dozens of people were in the capital to participate in the earings in the «Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos», ( Human Rights Interamerican Trial) that took place between 21 and 22 of June, a trail in which the country (Costa Rica) answers for crimes comited against the «guerrilheiros» of Araguaia in the 70 decade.

Sourses of that delegation consulted by UOL News informed that the quake was felt during the audiences in the capital city , San José, wihtout aparently causing any material damages.

Operator
12th July 2010, 04:42
Reports - no damage, no victims.

If there is no damage and no victims ... there is no need for humanitarian help or something.
Why do you think the earthquake is related to the topic of this thread ?

MariaDine
12th July 2010, 05:12
:) HELLO !

THE EARTHQUAKES ARE A «CONSTANT» THESE DAYS ACOORDING TO http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/db/eqinfo.php .

ANYWAY, WE CAN NOT IGNORE THAT SEVERAL OF THE AREAS WITH QUAKES WILL GIVE US CLUES TO SOME OF THE «PLAYS» NOW RUNNIG IN THE «THEATERS» OF EARTH...AND SEVERAL ISSUES ARE COMING IN TO FOCUS.

PAST ACTIONS (70 DECADE) ARE NOW COMING (2010) INTO PEOPLE'S EYE FOR SCRUTINY....HUMAN RIGHTS VERSUS POLITICAL ASSINATIONS....

AMERICA IS PRESENT IN COSTA RICA DUE TO THE REQUEST OF THIS COUNTRY, WHICH ASK EUA HELP BACK THEN IN THE 70s.

GREETINGS FROM EUROPE- PORTUGAL
MD

Fredkc
12th July 2010, 14:58
If the author from the article in Kerry's blog is right then Costa Rica will not be south enough since he/she mentions Panama which is even further south.
Well the fact is, the military PTB in Washington have wanted a military presence there since way back in the Contra days. Sadly, it looks like they finally have one.

For another, it may be that Costa Rica is just fine, since it would then provide a military foothold between the US and Panama, since the Chinese seem to be gaining in influence there.

Food for thought, anyway,
Fred

Operator
12th July 2010, 15:16
Well the fact is, the military PTB in Washington have wanted a military presence there since way back in the Contra days. Sadly, it looks like they finally have one.

Good point Fred ... however then it would be more logical if they were going for a longer lasting deal then january 2011 (if they stick to it anyway).
My gut feeling is telling me that something more actual/recent is cooking ...