‘You Know Something? You’re a F–-ing A–hole’: Iowa Man Confronts Gingrich..!

[jackovesk]

December 20, 2011

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Gingrich-grocery.jpg

GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich got an uncensored earful from an Iowa man during a campaign stop Tuesday.

In a moment captured on camera, the man, dressed in camouflage, approached the former House Speaker in a grocery store and told him to his face, “You know something? You’re a f–king asshole.”

Though audio of the exchange is slightly muffled, Gingrich seems to answer, “No I am not!”

“Yes,” the man said.

“It’s a free country,” Gingrich is heard saying as the clip ends.

The exchange was reported on CNN during “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer.” Watch below:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJGrUuwL1B0&feature=player_embedded

GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich got an uncensored earful from an Iowa man during a campaign stop Tuesday.

In a moment captured on camera, the man, dressed in camouflage, approached the former House Speaker in a grocery store and told him to his face, “You know something? You’re a f–king asshole.”

Though audio of the exchange is slightly muffled, Gingrich seems to answer, “No I am not!”

“Yes,” the man said.

“It’s a free country,” Gingrich is heard saying as the clip ends.

The exchange was reported on CNN during “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer.” Watch below:

Gingrich, who surged to the front of the GOP pack in the last month, has seen his poll numbers in Iowa begin to slide just two weeks out from the caucuses. He also lost out on the endorsements of two major social conservative leaders: Bob Vander Plaats, head of the Christian group Family Leader, and Iowa Family Policy Center head Chuck Hurley both backed former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum Tuesday.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/you-know-something-youre-a-f-king-a-hole-iowa-man-confronts-gingrich/

[Unified Serenity]

Hey,

I like the truth getting out, but I don't think it does much service for a guy in camoflage to say this to Mr. Gingrich. I am not saying it's a psy-op, but wonder how people who saw this immediately thought, "Yeh, another knuckle dragging back woods Ron Paul nutter!" In your face stuff like that can go both ways, especially when the only message is, "Your a effing asshole" and not something of substance that says why he is an asshole. If it's getting a lot of airtime, what is their goal? To hurt Gingrich, to boost Romney, and to subtly portray those who support RP are these camo wearing nutters.

[NewFounderHome]

Well i will say then the man could have been dressed in a suit with a tie and said the same thing and the reaction would have been the same. This might even be staged, we don’t know! For sure the big media is going to try and spin this. But i guess the population of the US is smarter than that. I hope the population of the US is wakened enough to notice what is going on.

[modwiz]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

[Crazytarget]

Actually, asshole is not quite a sufficient adjetive to describe or insult him. Might as well just call him a meanie. Traitor, thief, a true menace to society that cares nothing for the people, a complete coward Newt is.

[ghostrider]

we're all a-holes for allowing a corrupt system we pay for to rule over us for so long. the lesser of two evils is still evil...

[Calz]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

Do a quick search on what the Newtered one wants to bring forth and it is about as dark as anyone since Cheney.

No time for links ... not hard to find.

[modwiz]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

Do a quick search on what the Newtered one wants to bring forth and it is about as dark as anyone since Cheney.

No time for links ... not hard to find.

The Newt is for sale. Always has been. He is an empty man in every way but one. He is totally full of sh!t.

[Calz]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

Do a quick search on what the Newtered one wants to bring forth and it is about as dark as anyone since Cheney.

No time for links ... not hard to find.

The Newt is for sale. Always has been. He is an empty man in every way but one. He is totally full of sh!t.

... and to illustrate just how deep the madness has gone ... there is only one republican that has any virtue whatsoever (and we all know who that is).

... and guess what???

If (when) he wins Iowa it is suggested we should ignore it ... ***WHAT***???


_________________



Latest media talking point: ‘If Ron Paul wins Iowa it won’t count’


Patrick Henningsen
Infowars.com
December 21, 2011


As the January Iowa Caucus fast approaches and Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) begins to eclipse the GOP’s establishment field, a new media talking point has been formulated in what appears to be a further attempt at marginalizing a genuine Paul run at the Republican nomination.

According to Fox News election correspondent Chris Wallace, if Ron Paul wins the Iowa Caucus, “To a certain degree, it will discredit the Iowa Caucuses because rightly or wrongly, I think most of the Republican establishment thinks he’s not going to end up as the nominee, so therefore, Iowa won’t count.”

A number of national and local polls have already placed Ron Paul in the lead over GOP establishment rivals Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, a development that is proving frustrating for some pundits in the corporate media who have previously acted as king makers in similar past election cycles.

Young Turks host Cenk Uygur countered Wallace’s skewed assertion on his recent show, explaining the clear absence of logic in this latest media talking point. He refers to President Barack Obama’s 2008 Iowa Caucus victory, hailed by pundits as the key factor in his successful run towards Super Tuesday, and the eventual winning of his Democrat Party’s nomination.

OeF4sDjEbqo


Critics may deduce from FOX’s desperate talking point here, that the old guard of the Washington media and political establishment have been caught unaware, and are now frightened by the emergence of Ron Paul on the national scene.

Previously, Paul has struggled with the corporate media during the 2011 preliminary debates, where he was on the whole, given considerably less speaking time than the rest of the field, including a number of other GOP runners who have since dropped out of the race.

It seems the only people not surprised by his recent surge in the polls are Ron Paul’s numerous and wholly committed supporters across the country.


http://www.infowars.com/latest-media-talking-point-if-ron-paul-wins-iowa-it-wont-count/

[crested-duck]

Freedom of speech, if we do not use it now it will be taken away from us all . Even if Ron Paul wins the election of the voters,the electoral college can and will go against popular vote. The game is rigged and he cannot win! It's really a shame because I like the guy and what he represents . http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?36320-VOTING-just-a-waste-of-time-and-effort

[modwiz]

We have come to that point in the Wizard of OZ where Toto has pulled back the curtain. We are being told that the man pulling levers should be ignored (PTW). The ones who are missing this plot are technically dead. The PTW are dissolving in front of our eyes at all levels.

[Calz]

Freedom of speech, if we do not use it now it will be taken away from us all . Even if Ron Paul wins the election of the voters,the electoral college can and will go against popular vote. The game is rigged and he cannot win! It's really a shame because I like the guy and what he represents .

Sure ... but wait a second.

More and more people are waking up to that fact (remember the smear job on him the last election?)

Something is happening now.

Yes the electronic voting machines are totally hackable ... one computer anywhere in the world.

If RP has a big enough margin to win and he doesn't then that is another nail in the coffin for the orchestrated madness of our produced reality.

At some point something must break!!!

[crested-duck]

I'm gonna predict Hanging-Chads involved with the electoral college participants for 2012. We should start a betting pool for what the lie and controversy will be at election time, just for the fun of it of course.

[Calz]

I'm gonna predict Hanging-Chads involved with the electoral college participants for 2012. We should start a betting pool for what the lie and controversy will be at election time, just for the fun of it of course.

Hanging chads :lol:

I will do everyong a favor by not posting images of GW or AG ... there are so many to laugh at but let us set that aside.

Enough people are aware of the voting fraud situation (not just in the public but in government as well).

Let us not cave in to what has been happening for how many years now and surrender to the assumption that overwhelming corruption due to pay-offs from a money system that is completely fraudulent is an automatic winner.

Shall we just follow the friendly jackboots herding us into the FEMA camps???

When is enough enough???

What will it take???

[Arrowwind]

Freedom of speech, if we do not use it now it will be taken away from us all . Even if Ron Paul wins the election of the voters,the electoral college can and will go against popular vote. The game is rigged and he cannot win! It's really a shame because I like the guy and what he represents . http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?36320-VOTING-just-a-waste-of-time-and-effort


Well if this happens it man be time for a real revoltion, one to make Occupy Wallstreet look like a walk in the park.

[Cartomancer]

Newt is an evil reptilian. He even has a reptilian (amphibious) name.

[Unified Serenity]

I promise you, if the EC does some game with the election and RP wins, there will be the biggest protest and upheaval since the civil war.... that may be what the goal is, ya know?

[Cartomancer]

This whole thing is getting to be interesting in a bad way. I was watching CBS last night. First they said there was "another poll" in which there was a three way tie. They showed pictures Romney and Gingrich flanking a blank silhouette with a question mark representing Ron Paul. Then in the course of the four minute piece they were doing didn't even mention Ron Paul once. They even referred to him as the "other candidate."

Yes maybe there will be a big conflict if Paul wins. I thought the same thing in the disputed Bush Gore election and nothing ever happened. I think these people believe they can get away with anything. JFK, rigged elections, 911, Gulf of Tonkin, etc. Let's not even mention the mass shootings that have all kinds of questionable facts associated with them. Underwear bombers yadda. As long as the big game is on this weekend no one gives a crap about anything.

I worry more about what will happen to Ron Paul if he is elected. There is a clear track record of anyone messing with the Fed dies.

[Calz]

I promise you, if the EC does some game with the election and RP wins, there will be the biggest protest and upheaval since the civil war.... that may be what the goal is, ya know?

We are heading for that regardless.

Would you prefer RP or O or Newt or Palin as the puppet of choice when it comes down???

You have put out some very positive posts regarding RP. Are you now suggesting if he wins it is a "bad thing"???

We are not talking DW this time ... explain to me why if you are so in favor of RP if he wins then it will all fall apart.

No knock.

I am quite weary of the negativity in this forum (LATELY).

I ask you quite sincerely as another RP supporter why you suggest such a thing.

Upheaval since civil war ... goal?

Clearly the stated "goal" is chaos (pheonix rising sh*t).

Can you elaborate???

Please let me make clear this is in no fashion "an attack". You seem quite sensitive to other viewpoints regarding DW. I actually appreciate many of your thoughts along those lines despite complete acknowledgement of his core work and his latest book.

[Unified Serenity]

As I have stated many times, I have no sacred cows. I look at what I see happening. I look for motivations and outcomes. I look for who is being ridiculed by the ptb. I look for optional scenarios, such as if RP wins will the Republicans run a 3rd party candidate to make sure he can't win. Now the option is on the table of course of the EC stealing the election and what scenario might that play out. The PTB have for a long time wanted the most chaos to instigate war, upheaval to such an extent that in our collective pain we cry en masse for peace and security and trust me, they have a plan to give us that, it's just not a very free peace or free security, but total control of what we say, where we go, what we do, and how we live our lives.

I am not a super computer. Quite frankly, Khaleesi dislikes playing chess with me because of my unorthodox approach, but I end up with all her men, and chase her around the board trying to check mate her stupid king. It's rather pathetic to watch us play actually.

I did not make my observation about this "civil war" thing as a negative but a reality situation. I can see looking at it from that angle that there very well could be a massive uprising, and once you get the people mad enough it's not a thinking mass, but a mob. Mobs can be infiltrated easily, swayed to do stupid things, and thus another end game option. I guess you could say I say these things because I am sort of like a satallite viewing things and sending out pictures and possibilities.

I appreciate your questions. I don't have the answers. All I can say is I see strong possibilities based on what I know of history and psychology of the masses.

Much love,

Serenity



I promise you, if the EC does some game with the election and RP wins, there will be the biggest protest and upheaval since the civil war.... that may be what the goal is, ya know?

We are heading for that regardless.

Would you prefer RP or O or Newt or Palin as the puppet of choice when it comes down???

You have put out some very positive posts regarding RP. Are you now suggesting if he wins it is a "bad thing"???

We are not talking DW this time ... explain to me why if you are so in favor of RP if he wins then it will all fall apart.

No knock.

I am quite weary of the negativity in this forum (LATELY).

I ask you quite sincerely as another RP supporter why you suggest such a thing.

Upheaval since civil war ... goal?

Clearly the stated "goal" is chaos (pheonix rising sh*t).

Can you elaborate???

Please let me make clear this is in no fashion "an attack". You seem quite sensitive to other viewpoints regarding DW. I actually appreciate many of your thoughts along those lines despite complete acknowledgement of his core work and his latest book.

[Calz]

Thanks for your response.

I used to play chess quite well going back to my high school days. :chess:

Again ... I have appreciated your input even though many seem to want to suggest "seperate camps".

I don't see that and am frankly confused by some of the levels of intensity (not you personally).

:yo:

[Lifebringer]

Did he say "glass pole?

He was right on both ways.

[scotusa]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

Modwiz, you mean he is a non-working asshole, even worse!

[sandy]

A little Irony!! A"slimy eel" is also called a Newt (at least in crossword puzzles) :)

[evancruz1]

Woulda, coulda,shoulda. Is the foul mouthed man correct in his statement/assessment? It's nice to hear some truth in the same vicinity as Newt. Very refreshing.

Refreshing is such the correct word here:clap2: