PDA

View Full Version : TOP Secret Government Facility (holds Flight 93 evidence)



ktlight
1st January 2012, 11:30
"I am probably preaching to the choir here, but the reason that flight 93 remains are stored in an Iron Mountain is because they display evidence inconsistent with a plane that simply nose dived into the ground. Let us not forget that wreckage was strewn for 6 miles, which is what you would expect to find when a plane is shot down with a missile at 30 thousand feet. The wreckage of a nose dive would be contained to a relatively small area. What about WTC 7???
KingFelix78 4 hours ago"

2aou6c2MOmg

Vrilya
1st January 2012, 12:44
Well at least she tried to get the truth out, the best she could anyway...
Good video Klight :cool:

Chucky
1st January 2012, 12:46
Interesting theory. I do remember the happy hooligans and 2 witnesses on the ground which were told they didn't see this jet low to the ground or see 2 missiles followed by two f16's. Happened to be a vietnam vet that knows a missle and knows the fighters too. There was apparently wreckage found about 6-8 miles from the real crash. Not shanksville. Plenty witnesses to this. How ever I take you back to the last moments of the fight to get into the cockpit deal ok. The only people allowed to hear this when the recordings released were family of the deceased. Now 3 people gave chilling accounts on hearing wind rushing past as they apparently tried to get in the cockpit before the crash.
Now this is crucial cause wind doesn't rush past unless there is a hull breach. This is a jet liner designed as you said above 30,000 feet etc. Pressurised environment. How ever the report from the hooligans and ground witnesses and the debris 8miles from the crash site support something else. The hooligans story is 2 fighters fully armed approached it and were ordered to take it down. The first step is to get it low to the ground. They strafed the side of it (Which gives wind rushing past validity) with canon fire. Followed by 2 missiles that downed it. Now the time to take between attacks the plane travelled 6-8miles down range. Of course any sane person knows a crater with no wreckage is just that a crater. Bomb crater. The real crash site would of shown the plane, bodies, and of course bullet holes through the body parts of the plane. This I feel is the area we need to look. It was covered up for sure but being shot down from that height means too big an area to hide. My opinion of course.


"I am probably preaching to the choir here, but the reason that flight 93 remains are stored in an Iron Mountain is because they display evidence inconsistent with a plane that simply nose dived into the ground. Let us not forget that wreckage was strewn for 6 miles, which is what you would expect to find when a plane is shot down with a missile at 30 thousand feet. The wreckage of a nose dive would be contained to a relatively small area. What about WTC 7???
KingFelix78 4 hours ago"

2aou6c2MOmg

Chucky
1st January 2012, 12:50
Just another point for people to think about. 2 space shuttles crashed. The parts were all over the place right? Well Columbia re-entered from space and there were still recognisable parts found and big too. How the hell do these guys think we can buy their story that all 4 planes disintegrated on impact with the towers, pentagon and shankskville with low flying aircraft. GOT TO BE KIDDING ME Right?? Crazy these guys need to be hung in times square.

Mulder
1st January 2012, 13:31
I totally agree. I regularly watch Aircrash Investigations on Discovery Channel and wreckage strewn for 6 miles is totally consistent with the plane being shot down! Other flights like the Korean Air Lines Flight 007 which was shot down by the USSR in 1983 had wreckage strewn over a large area. This killed Congressman Larry McDonald who was outspoken about the NWO - he was truely ahead of his time and probably killing him was the real reason this flight was shot down. I encourage you all to watch his incredible "Crossfire" interview on youtube:

_BPhYEFGaGM

TargeT
1st January 2012, 13:35
I know an officer in the pensilvannia National Guard (at the time of the crash) & based on his testimony I'll say this:

the plane was no where near that area, a hole was dug in the ground & some trash tossed around it.... houses that neighbored the crash site were sized and never returned (why?) there's no way a plane was there.

none.

DreamsInDigital
1st January 2012, 15:54
Just another point for people to think about. 2 space shuttles crashed. The parts were all over the place right? Well Columbia re-entered from space and there were still recognisable parts found and big too. How the hell do these guys think we can buy their story that all 4 planes disintegrated on impact with the towers, pentagon and shankskville with low flying aircraft. GOT TO BE KIDDING ME Right?? Crazy these guys need to be hung in times square.
I vote for them being hung on the steps of the capital. It would be more symbolic that way and I think get a much clearer point across.

Besides, didn't Cheney admit publically that Flight 93 was shot down? But, then also I am wondering about this also because I've seen video footage of the plane with the exact same ID Number in post 9-11 footage.