iconoclast : What topic haven't you explored because its a "given"?

[TargeT]

For starters:

Inbreeding, clearly there's a social stigma (and perhaps even laws) against this & the (primary) reasoning is genetic defect propigation (IIRC).

and yet, there seems to be very plausable theories that "tbtw" have inbred for GENERATIONS to preserve certain genetic traits (what ever they maybe) & along with this topic we've been held from a lot of "human breeding" info.. Like the power of following the Maternal line instead of the patriarcal.

so is this knowledge that is hiden in plain site, is this a topic that needs exploring or has someone already done this (& if so please post your findings)

Lets be logical, because the current stigma is full of logical fallacy.

Any other topics? I know we've already gotten most the easy ones, lets try to keep it to ideas that have not been presented on the forum

(such as: Inbreeding, good or bad?)

Just a thought.

[Mulder]

But these "Laws" are only for the sheeple, the Elites have kept their bloodlines for hundreds of years by arranged marriages and inbreeding! E.g. Look at Aldous Huxley (Aldous Leonard Huxley was an English writer and one of the most prominent members of the famous Huxley family...). But, on the other hand, Hitler was also "in-bread" and look how he turned out....