PDA

View Full Version : Metaphysical law of destiny



Beren
3rd January 2012, 00:11
Here I will post this amazing book written by Serbian engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic.

He is the author of the book and unfortunately it`s only in Serbian.
The book was made a lot of years ago and recently was placed on his website for free.

web site :

www.istinik.com (http://www.istinik.com)


In short ,book isn`t long and is a collection of metaphysical laws that are present in all existence.

I am sure most of us know them or can hint at them for they are ever present and Creator founded.

Be blessed- everyone who reads this.

1st law:

Founding law of metaphysics - law of God

God is in everything and everything is in him. He is allpresent ,timeless ,in and out of time,eternal and limitless. In all ways almighty and absolute; absolutely perfect and perfectly and positively real. His reality is beyond any other reality, his power beyond any other power and his goodness beyond any goodness.
God shows himself in everything and all collected metaphysical laws represent his direct manifestation.
Metaphysical meaning of the world represents his allpresence.
By breaking metaphysical laws and ignoring God`s presence and metaphysical meaning of himself and world, a man is voluntarily exiling himself from Kingdom of God- metaphysical (spiritual) realm of eternity, harmony and absolute happiness.



P.S.
this is the first law, stay tuned more to come...

P.P.S.

I will post only the laws without commentary of the laws...of which you can see on his site on Serbian.

Beren
3rd January 2012, 01:14
Second law:

Law about laws

Metaphysical laws are in effect ceaselessly without space or time limits or any other kind of limits.
There is no thing and no one that can stand against them and everything that man feels,thinks and does is worth only in the measure of level of connectedness with metaphysical laws. And thus no other real value can`t be spoken of.

Kimberley
3rd January 2012, 01:31
Thank you even though I am mono linguistic ....only know the English language! Love what you wrote!!!

Beren
3rd January 2012, 15:45
third law:

Law of love, faith and hope; eternal law of truth power and happiness

Have love ,faith and happiness and you will have all and more!
You will have eternal truth, greatest power and endless happiness.

Beren
3rd January 2012, 15:53
fourth law:

Law of cause and effect; law of "sowing and reaping"

Everything that happens is the EFFECT of something that already happened and
everything can be a cause of something that will happen. What is sown that is reaped.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Now those four are basic four laws of Metaphysic laws in this book.
All other laws are connected to those four.

Anchor
4th January 2012, 02:40
God is in everything and everything is in him. He is allpresent ,timeless ,in and out of time,eternal and limitless. In all ways almighty and absolute; absolutely perfect and perfectly and positively real. His reality is beyond any other reality, his power beyond any other power and his goodness beyond any goodness.
God shows himself in everything and all collected metaphysical laws represent his direct manifestation.
Metaphysical meaning of the world represents his allpresence.
By breaking metaphysical laws and ignoring God`s presence and metaphysical meaning of himself and world, a man is voluntarily exiling himself from Kingdom of God- metaphysical (spiritual) realm of eternity, harmony and absolute happiness.

But how can God or what is of God, break his own rules?

This is a paradox that arises around the idea of separation from that ALL.

Anything that is separate from that ALL is still OF that ALL, and since that ALL is infinite, so also is that which is separated from it. Having infinite things and the idea of infinity allows one to approach the paradox but this requires some abstract thinking - because that seems to be the trick and our lower minds have problems with infinite things otherwise.

I don't agree that Man breaks "God's" metaphysical rules - in fact I think it is impossible. Being free means you break no rules because there are none to break. When we live in a reality conditioned by fear of breaking rules, the very idea of rules at this level makes me wary as it has similarities to the idea of a controlling effort.

Man makes choices that enable him to experience different things and that may deepen the veil between him and his conscious connection to source, or it may lessen it.

My thinking is this: man did not separate himself from the creator/source (God), God did it as an exercise of exploration and freewill. Thus the one infinite creator created what we may think of as cosmology and this is the various logoic structures of the universe in which we play and they created the archetypes that resulted in the particular creation of which WE know as man, and did it in such a way that those "Men" can be self directing, and potentially able to forget this part of the model - that he is connected to, and indeed part of God.

By forget, I mean loose active conscious knowledge of.

Awakening to that connection, that we each are intrinsically linked, not only to each other, but to every quanta of the materialized universe AND the source of all the creation marks the start of the return journey - and there are all sorts of neat accelerators to help you along navigate the pathless land to truth.

But all along, as an individual you have free will, and you have the free will to do as thou wilt and to think and create according to your self-created circumstance and capacity - and be responsible for that which happens as a result and the potential drag that may have on your travels. You are free to bog yourself down!

So yes "God" did do all that, and it is magnificent. And now here you are translating the work of one part, so other parts can be influenced (accelerated or retarded as the case may be) in their personal journeys. And this is great, and it does make me feel happy to think on things and how perfect it all is.

One of my favorite definitions of what is meant by Namaste from Ram Dass (Dr Richard Alpert): "In India when we meet and part we often say, "Namaste," which means: I honor the place in you where the entire universe resides; I honor the place in you of love, of light, of truth, of peace. I honor the place within you where if you are in that place in you and I am in that place in me, there is only one of us.. "

You said that all the other laws stem from the first four. Equally, I would say (without having read them yet) that they all stem from the first.

Beren, as usual you got the thinking magic happening.

Thanks for this work you are doing.

Namaste!

John..

[1] "God" as I understand it here in this thread is synonymous with the term I normally use which is "the one infinite creator" - which would be the term I normally use. Admittedly I am biased because I have been very influenced by my study and contemplation on the Law of One.

RedeZra
4th January 2012, 08:04
By breaking metaphysical laws and ignoring God`s presence and metaphysical meaning of himself and world, a man is voluntarily exiling himself from Kingdom of God- metaphysical (spiritual) realm of eternity, harmony and absolute happiness.


But how can God or what is of God, break his own rules?

This is a paradox that arises around the idea of separation from that ALL.


if i may Anchor

this concept of i am God and so everything i think say and do is Godly and of God is a fallacy

it's a trap and a snare


body and mindstuff like thoughts and emotions are not of God but of the food we eat

it is bad pizza or vegan if more refined





One of my favorite definitions of what is meant by Namaste from Ram Dass (Dr Richard Alpert): "In India when we meet and part we often say, "Namaste," which means: I honor the place in you where the entire universe resides; I honor the place in you of love, of light, of truth, of peace. I honor the place within you where if you are in that place in you and I am in that place in me, there is only one of us.. "


that place which Namaste points to is the Kingdom of God within or the Realm of Self

we can never soil nor achieve this High estate within by the food we eat the thoughts we think and the acts we do because that High state is of God or Self

only relationship with God will take us there

Bollinger
4th January 2012, 08:28
Here I will post this amazing book written by Serbian engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic.

He is the author of the book and unfortunately it`s only in Serbian.
The book was made a lot of years ago and recently was placed on his website for free.

web site :

www.istinik.com (http://www.istinik.com)


In short ,book isn`t long and is a collection of metaphysical laws that are present in all existence.

I am sure most of us know them or can hint at them for they are ever present and Creator founded.

Be blessed- everyone who reads this.

1st law:

Founding law of metaphysics - law of God

God is in everything and everything is in him. He is allpresent ,timeless ,in and out of time,eternal and limitless. In all ways almighty and absolute; absolutely perfect and perfectly and positively real. His reality is beyond any other reality, his power beyond any other power and his goodness beyond any goodness.
God shows himself in everything and all collected metaphysical laws represent his direct manifestation.
Metaphysical meaning of the world represents his allpresence.
By breaking metaphysical laws and ignoring God`s presence and metaphysical meaning of himself and world, a man is voluntarily exiling himself from Kingdom of God- metaphysical (spiritual) realm of eternity, harmony and absolute happiness.



P.S.
this is the first law, stay tuned more to come...

P.P.S.

I will post only the laws without commentary of the laws...of which you can see on his site on Serbian.

May I ask how the engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic came to formulate these metaphysical laws?

Was it through experiment?
Was it through mathematics?
Was it through deductive reasoning?
Was it through a personal revelation?
Was it through a personal conversion of some sort?

Thanks, Bollinger.

Anchor
4th January 2012, 12:02
if i may Anchor

I think so, but it is not my thread.

In my post above up to where I started to talk about how it made me feel, I did not refer to the ego (my ego) nor any kind of ego identification with the one infinite creator. It is an important point. However, what this thread has done is let me find a new way to articulate what I mean.

I accept that one develops a relationship with the creator and this is how one is led on the pathless land. I don't know any other way - even if there is one. What I call the higher-self is instrumental in this process and the guide through that process.

I am certain we are dancing around some area's of agreement.

I do not share any notions of any requirement to humble myself before the one infinite creator, or fear anything. In fact I refuse to do it. If this means I cannot follow the path you are on, then I am sure the infinite creator is fine with that.

I will endeavour to express my full potential as a free man. A free man who was created that way by the one infinite creator in the image of same; with creative abilities, responsibility and freewill - tempered by the wisdom accumulated over long periods of "time" and various experiences and the making of mistakes and dealing with the consequences, with the added fun factor of forgetting practically all of it in this Earth bound incarnated lifetime - where I am here (incarnated) on a mission of service, just like most of the people that would read this.

Thus I feel that the creator and I get along just fine, because I have given way to the notion that we are separate - we are not. I, like you, am still alive here in this dense expression of reality, in a chemical body, because it suits the combined purposes of our individual and eternal souls and the will of the creator. I have no problems with anything that happens to me in this game. My thoughts, food, acts and emotions are after all those of the creator, and for the purpose of the one infinite creator.

I am created by and simultaneously within the creation am I not?

This is what I FEEL and when I gaze about me, I have learned to glimpse the creator - even with my ignorant monkey mind.

It is on this basis that I claim remembrance of our connection.

If you do the same, we will know each-other as one as well.

As we progress we as mankind/humankind, will learn to do this in increasingly large and resonant harmonious groups until we are all like this and then we will sing as one in the praise of the perfection of all that is - together as one.

And we will laugh at how cosmically complicated we made everything - just to see what would happen.

Any attempt to get me to fear the shortcomings of my path to the truth will fail. I am not without errors or problems, but I have learned to value the opportunities and to learn from my errors/problems which have that purpose.

It is not impossible that I can be trapped and snared, but if I am, I am confident there is a reason, a lesson and a purpose. I have enough past experience of the grace of my angels, guides, helpers and of my higher self in this lifetime that I am completely confident that I will always be assisted in my escapes and that this is all perfect as well - until, that is the day I die, and that will be a fun trip as well.

This is my faith.

Thanks for making me write it out like this. It has been helpful for both me and potentially some quanta of you know who.

That is why we play.

Namaste

Beren
4th January 2012, 12:18
.

May I ask how the engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic came to formulate these metaphysical laws?

Was it through experiment?
Was it through mathematics?
Was it through deductive reasoning?
Was it through a personal revelation?
Was it through a personal conversion of some sort?

Thanks, Bollinger.



He works in Hydro power plant in Serbia and is in science for couple of decades but the only bugger is that he doesn't have anything in English so I am doing my best to translate his work here.

All that you quoted here in question is performed and done by him.
When asked he stated that he is religious but he also states that a man has to rise above man made dogmas be it in science or religion or any other man made form of society or group of people.

Bollinger
4th January 2012, 12:48
.

May I ask how the engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic came to formulate these metaphysical laws?

Was it through experiment?
Was it through mathematics?
Was it through deductive reasoning?
Was it through a personal revelation?
Was it through a personal conversion of some sort?

Thanks, Bollinger.



He works in Hydro power plant in Serbia and is in science for couple of decades but the only bugger is that he doesn't have anything in English so I am doing my best to translate his work here.

All that you quoted here in question is performed and done by him.
When asked he stated that he is religious but he also states that a man has to rise above man made dogmas be it in science or religion or any other man made form of society or group of people.

I see. OK thank you for responding.

I don't know Serbian either but I don't detect anything that is radical or new (i.e. not heard of before) in the translations you have provided so I was just curious as to how he came to these conclusions.

RedeZra
4th January 2012, 13:33
I do not share any notions of any requirement to humble myself before the one infinite creator, or fear anything. In fact I refuse to do it. If this means I cannot follow the path you are on, then I am sure the infinite creator is fine with that.

My thoughts, food, acts and emotions are after all those of the creator, and for the purpose of the one infinite creator.




i do not tremble in fear before God

because to fear God is to fear to disrespect and disappoint God as to love God is to love to respect and obey God

if we kill steal lie and seduce our neigbour's wife then we neither fear nor love God


i do venerate God after all God is the Creator of this spinning blue globe and more my soul

so i do not pick a fight with God ; )


the thoughts of the wordly are of the world and so are the thoughts of the godly

but the godly are after God while the wordly are after the world

which we are bound to leave sooner or later

Beren
4th January 2012, 13:38
.

May I ask how the engineer and physicist Miroslav Mika Markovic came to formulate these metaphysical laws?

Was it through experiment?
Was it through mathematics?
Was it through deductive reasoning?
Was it through a personal revelation?
Was it through a personal conversion of some sort?

Thanks, Bollinger.



He works in Hydro power plant in Serbia and is in science for couple of decades but the only bugger is that he doesn't have anything in English so I am doing my best to translate his work here.

All that you quoted here in question is performed and done by him.
When asked he stated that he is religious but he also states that a man has to rise above man made dogmas be it in science or religion or any other man made form of society or group of people.

I see. OK thank you for responding.

I don't know Serbian either but I don't detect anything that is radical or new (i.e. not heard of before) in the translations you have provided so I was just curious as to how he came to these conclusions.

Well those four are only the beginning and the core laws as he stated.
Some others are speculative but true.

Some could sound very tough for modern understanding but when you look deeper they are spot on.

Basically we as humanity are at the point of merging various works over millenia into one understanding...
Different sources spoke about same things though with different words...

Beren
4th January 2012, 14:23
if i may Anchor

I think so, but it is not my thread.

:bump2:

In my post above up to where I started to talk about how it made me feel, I did not refer to the ego (my ego) nor any kind of ego identification with the one infinite creator. It is an important point. However, what this thread has done is let me find a new way to articulate what I mean.

I accept that one develops a relationship with the creator and this is how one is led on the pathless land. I don't know any other way - even if there is one. What I call the higher-self is instrumental in this process and the guide through that process.

I am certain we are dancing around some area's of agreement.

I do not share any notions of any requirement to humble myself before the one infinite creator, or fear anything. In fact I refuse to do it. If this means I cannot follow the path you are on, then I am sure the infinite creator is fine with that.

I will endeavour to express my full potential as a free man. A free man who was created that way by the one infinite creator in the image of same; with creative abilities, responsibility and freewill - tempered by the wisdom accumulated over long periods of "time" and various experiences and the making of mistakes and dealing with the consequences, with the added fun factor of forgetting practically all of it in this Earth bound incarnated lifetime - where I am here (incarnated) on a mission of service, just like most of the people that would read this.

Thus I feel that the creator and I get along just fine, because I have given way to the notion that we are separate - we are not. I, like you, am still alive here in this dense expression of reality, in a chemical body, because it suits the combined purposes of our individual and eternal souls and the will of the creator. I have no problems with anything that happens to me in this game. My thoughts, food, acts and emotions are after all those of the creator, and for the purpose of the one infinite creator.

I am created by and simultaneously within the creation am I not?

This is what I FEEL and when I gaze about me, I have learned to glimpse the creator - even with my ignorant monkey mind.

It is on this basis that I claim remembrance of our connection.

If you do the same, we will know each-other as one as well.

As we progress we as mankind/humankind, will learn to do this in increasingly large and resonant harmonious groups until we are all like this and then we will sing as one in the praise of the perfection of all that is - together as one.

And we will laugh at how cosmically complicated we made everything - just to see what would happen.

Any attempt to get me to fear the shortcomings of my path to the truth will fail. I am not without errors or problems, but I have learned to value the opportunities and to learn from my errors/problems which have that purpose.

It is not impossible that I can be trapped and snared, but if I am, I am confident there is a reason, a lesson and a purpose. I have enough past experience of the grace of my angels, guides, helpers and of my higher self in this lifetime that I am completely confident that I will always be assisted in my escapes and that this is all perfect as well - until, that is the day I die, and that will be a fun trip as well.

This is my faith.

Thanks for making me write it out like this. It has been helpful for both me and potentially some quanta of you know who.

That is why we play.

Namaste


Johnster

I like the way you reasoning.
This is the miracle of life and Creator that we play as life forms (never truly separated from source) always in the Creator's field - itself.

Those 'laws' that I am translating is merely the notions of what is at work in existence.
You can do all you please forever but every action will birth some reaction on every level.

When you're good at play you learn how to swim in the plasma of life...

It's difficult to explain with human languages on this level of conscience of what is really going on... I deem that we yet need to develop lingo for it...

Beren
4th January 2012, 19:55
here comes other laws in this book;

P.S. he called them laws but more accurate or precise would be observed patterns in universe-hence human termed" laws"

Law of action and reaction

In material universe on all levels there is a law of action and reaction which is:
action causes equal reaction.This law is just one special case of much bigger and broader law of metaphysics and that is -
reaction is always bigger that action and it goes bigger and larger when the manifestation of the reaction is expected later.
Human thoughts,feelings ,intentions ,attitudes and deeds are causing reaction which does not have to manifest neither now nor separately, when in fact is always joined in with other reactions thus it is hardly seen or perceivable by humans.
Nevertheless metaphysical reaction be it positive or negative must come to manifestation.

Beren
4th January 2012, 20:05
Law of activity

Every activity of man is worth truly only in measure of its metaphysical motivation or it`s worth thus far in the measure of its connectedness with the Real and True purpose, otherwise it can not make anyone truly happier.

Beren
4th January 2012, 20:57
I will here take the liberty to jump fast forward to the law No. 145 which is;

Law of the ending of the world

Evidence shows that there is more than thousand "prophecies" (and those were the "truthful ones" ) which "prophesied" the end of the world that "should" have happened. The one thing that is common with all those prophecies is that neither one is true, not a single end happened.
Nevertheless some fragments from prophecies were happening many times (wars,hunger,diseases,earth changes ) thus it can be stated that prophets and "prophets" were not always wrong.
But one thing is certain ; to people who have damaged soul the end of the world is happening ceaselessly.
That is the moment of their physical death where all their illusions and wealth and "powers" become ash and dust.
For that kind of people (sadly the majority) is irrelevant do whole world dies or just they.

For them the phrase is valid - everybody dies alone.
But also there is this truth that who ever wishes evil to at least one man - makes a sin. Thus far how greater sin is to wish the end of the world just because someone is not satisfied with his /her own life?

A man does not have a right to wish bad for himself or any other and mostly not to the whole world no matter how that world is,
for God created the best possible world and all that is bad in it was and is created by humans against the will of God freely abusing their gift of free will. Thus there is no reason that the world should end; only that which is bad and which is making the world an ugly place.
It is not given to man to decide when it will be when in fact it is happening all the time; more and more, more visible as time goes on.

The end of the world will not be for those whom does not wish it for others. They take care about their own soul; their own thoughts, feelings, deeds,intentions.
When the time for learning comes to an end, when time speeds up to a point where you see causes and effects right away,when seasons start mingling and twisting, when darkness and light are mixing then the GREAT CHANGE will happen.
Final "test" of greatest and longest human "schooling".
Final showdown with powers of Light Good and Wisdom with forces of darkness, evil and stupidity .

Metaphysics knows the result just as physics knows the place where the stone will fall if you have all parameters,angles and velocity...
Evil, darkness and stupidity of spiritless behavior will utterly fall and will take with it all in utter ruin that is made on evil or caused by darkness and stupidity.

But that WILL NOT be the end of the world because all humanity after- will be a world of grown up souls. A world of Light, harmony and eternal happiness.

RedeZra
5th January 2012, 11:54
Evil, darkness and stupidity of spiritless behavior will utterly fall and will take with it all in utter ruin that is made on evil or caused by darkness and stupidity.

But that WILL NOT be the end of the world because all humanity after- will be a world of grown up souls. A world of Light, harmony and eternal happiness.



God is growing a garden with tender care and hope that the seeds will grow to souls fit to fragrance the Kingdom of God

the rose of compassion the lily of love the grape of goodness the jasmine of justice the sage of righteousness the iris of innocence

these are fragrances of the flowers in the Garden of God

Beren
5th January 2012, 22:22
Law of altruism

Anyone can be truly happy as much as he/she is ready to make value for happiness of others or that he/she is genuinely happy because of happiness of others and that he /she honestly wishes happiness of others. Altruism is a very powerful way to achieve something before we had even wished it for, while egoism as opposite of altruism is furthering us from even good that we put a hard effort to happen.

Beren
5th January 2012, 22:37
Law of ambition

Ambition in its core is a form of hope.
If it`s based on the law of Love, hope and faith - ambition is healthy and useful .
If its not it becomes damaging and sick.

Beren
5th January 2012, 22:40
Law of temptation

All human temptations are having its core in freedom of not respecting the metaphysical truths.

Beren
8th January 2012, 12:52
Law of science

Everyone who is in science as their field of work will inevitably come to metaphysics.
The science is only true and useful as long as it can usefully be there for man`s spiritually & intellectual rise.
Science that leads man from the metaphysical truths can be rooted upon thoughtfulness but not on a wisdom too.
Being in that science is harmful; spiritless and naive realistic science is there to fulfill self proclaimed needs but it can never bring one to the accomplishment of real happiness.

Beren
8th January 2012, 13:01
Law of Kingdom of Heaven

By the name Kingdom of Heaven we call higher worlds that are in Spiritual essence.
By sky(or heaven) we mean other dimensions of existence.
Every man or woman can be an embassy of Kingdom of Heaven.
Every man and woman can exist in sky(heaven) or can carry the sky(heaven) inside.
Sky(heaven) and Kingdom of Heaven must be found before all in yourself.