PDA

View Full Version : NASA Admits Cold Fusion LENR Energy Revolution 2012



ExomatrixTV
13th January 2012, 17:46
2Zgmdo4C1VQ

http://whynotnews.eu/?p=756

By Dr. Mark D. Nispel | January 12, 2012


NASA is all in and claiming to “be working on another way of producing energy with efficient nuclear power.” NASA as an organization apparently suddenly wants to be seen as in the forefront of this new thing they see coming. Pretty cool actually.
NASA has produced and featured a video presenting LENR as a technology. The video features Dr. Joseph Zawodny, Senior Research Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center. The video highlights the potential of having a LENR nuclear power generation device in your home to provide all the power needs of your home as the “easiest” implementation, even though it could potentially be used even for transportation and infrastructure. The technology is “clean” producing no ionizing radiation or waste.
See the video highlight on the right of the NASA technology gateway page here (http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/).
The video directly is here (http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html).
In the meantime, A. Rossi continues to move apace claiming he is working on putting his e-cat LENR device into production. He is working with National Instruments to complete his design. He claims that the first small home units that generate electricity and can heat / cool the home will be in production by the end of 2012 for around $1500 and he plans on producing a million the first year after they get going. See here (http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/01/rossi-plans-for-small-10-kw-e-cats-to-cost-100-150/) and here (http://e-catsite.com/2012/01/03/mass-production-next-big-hurdle-for-rossi/).
Two interesting notes:
1. The NASA video avoids using the term “cold fusion.”
2. The NASA video interestingly right toward the end uses an image to represent LENR somewhat abstractly which it attributes to the US Navy SPAWAR within the video (see lower left).
source (http://mnispel.net/neengineer/?p=380)
Rossi: Already Started Production of Small E-Cats to Cost $100-150 per kW

January 6, 2012

This post (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510#comments) from Andrea Rossi deserves its own thread.
Dear K. Dobrolecki:

We must make a distinction between the price of the industrial plants and the price of the domestic plants.

For the industrial plants ( the 1 MW plants) the price from 2012 will be around 1,500.00 US$/kW, moreless 10%.

The domestic E-Cats of 10 kW will be manufactured with a different technology and with a very good economy scale, due to the fact that we have started the production of 1 million pieces; such scale, obviously, will reduce by an order of magnitude the costs. If all goes as I hope and as I am working for, the 10 kW E-Cats will cost between 100 and 150
US$/kW. This fact will:
1- allow to everybody to buy an E-Cat
2- cancel the competition

The reverse engineering will be, I think, impossible, due to a system we invented for this purpose, but even if somebody will succeed to do it, it will anyway be impossible for him to compete economically. The 1 MW plants have a totally different technology and engineering.

Warm Regards,
A.R.
source (http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/01/rossi-plans-for-small-10-kw-e-cats-to-cost-100-150/)

onawah
13th January 2012, 18:21
I hope Wade Frazier will comment on this.

ghostrider
13th January 2012, 18:42
I'm suprised the ONE hasn't found this, that guy is always johnny one the spot with new info.

Amaterasu
18th January 2012, 02:47
Now if We can just wrest electrogravitics out of black ops, We will have free energy AND antigravity (gravity control)...

And THAT means We can get rid of the need for money (adding robots in place of Human energy for all necessary jobs no One want to do), and We can live in abundance, and rather than working, We can follow Our bliss - be that solving problems, building robots, playing a musical instrument, camping, researching...

The arts and sciences will burgeon.

Of course We need a code for society... And that is something I am working on. I have a link and welcome input: http://www.openlounge.org/forum/freedom-forum/the-ethical-planetarian-party-platform/

shaberon
12th April 2016, 21:10
This hasn't gone anywhere and, given the players, may not be "alternative" science.

LENR is a branch of what used to puzzle me in school...why don't we run some reactions off the weak force?

NASA continued research towards propulsion systems, as referenced in this mainstream presentation from 2014:

http://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/SeedlingWELLS.pdf

In 2013, Mitsubishi published a patent they had submitted in 2001:

http://www.google.com/patents/EP1202290B1?cl=en

They were able to transmute elements and make something to clean up radioactivity, and it looks like they have partnered with Toyota in this research.

The simple version is that a LENR device (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) uses a metal slug about the size of a nickel for fuel, which lasts about a year. It scales very well from something that would power a car, to a house, to the "cluster wing" aircraft NASA has in mind. Those are just a couple of examples, but it seems to remain: this is not being suppressed, it's being pursued by the majors. Yes, it would replace the gasoline and electricity industries as we know them.

Carmody
14th April 2016, 02:58
And the nickle sized slug is about one US dollar and the hardware to excite it into high thermal output, is about $1k, and it will put out about 3kw of heat, 24/7, for about one year, or up to as high 18 months, before being 'refreshed'.

So far, that is the result, in testing.

To top it off, the one dollar slug has no waste product,and it is renewable, inexpensively,and at low energy cost. So there is no serious accumulation of issue, in any way, no matter how much it is utilized. Think, 4-5-6-10 magnitudes less of issue as compared to today's energy use and production.

shaberon
14th April 2016, 05:40
Indeed. But we should point out the limitation of the system--it is not free energy.

It is not a self starting engine. It requires electrical input and does extreme overunity, something like three to one.