Stonehenge and Coral Castle building solved

[Unified Serenity]

This is why I keep researching. I have watched countless documentaries about how places like Stone Henge were built. These massive stones moved great distances and then standing them up, same thing with the great blocks in Egypt. Did it take help from Aliens or Gods?

Nope, man is perfectly capable of moving immense weight by himself. Watch this video and see 1 man move a 17 ton block with nothing but counter weight and some wood.

We are fully capable of doing great things without some supernatural explanations or ancient technology. This really caused me to do a face palm as in DUH! How stupid could we be not to see this? It's so simple. Watch him move these blocks and even a 300 ft Pole barn! Wonder how Coral Castle was built? Here ya go!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsoYkGb7p28

http://apolloideas.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/apollo-einstein3.png

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Here's some more Cool explanations.

K. I. S. S. Keep It Simple Sweetheart



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBRks6deEr8


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Qj2H_qkCEWY


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=F8P_hV4FpKk


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=lBQITsMQtjc

[BestLion]

Well here is the problem>
1. The stones he is moving are no more then 3 tons.Id like him to move a 300 tons stone of granite up 200 ft and set it perfectly in the kings chamber.
2. Lets talk of the extreme accuracy of the builders who built these great megaliths.They had precision accuracy.
So I would like him to move,place, cut a stone "of granite and dyarite' of 50 tons and then I may buy into his theory some more.
Also other mysteries like how they made the coffin in the kings chamber..how they lined up to the stars..and the queens chamber to Sirius..many many question.
but that was interesting how he did move the 1-3 tons stone.. kudos to him for the attempt.
Also I think that Atlantians built these monument of old.Atlanteans are generally considered to have had great occult and/or technological powers, and inhabited the lost continent of Atlantis, which was destroyed due to their abuse of psychic powers.

[Unified Serenity]

That one long block I believe was 17 tons. It's amazing, I show it right in front of you and you are not the least bit acknowledging that 1 man moving a 3 ton block with nothing more than wood and counter weight is very plausible. These videos do not deal with the accuracy, just the fact it can be placed. Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?

[Cartomancer]

This man is amazing. I have read several articles about what he is doing. The only thing that bothers me about this technique is the fact that he has to have a solid concrete slab underneath the whole rig to make it work. This would not be possible in many situations but may have been used at the site of construction itself. Also what he points out about the pivot stones could be used in many different situations where a stable base would not be available. He is on to something.

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.

[BestLion]

That one long block I believe was 17 tons. It's amazing, I show it right in front of you and you are not the least bit acknowledging that 1 man moving a 3 ton block with nothing more than wood and counter weight is very plausible. These videos do not deal with the accuracy, just the fact it can be placed. Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?
I thought it was 7 tons..Yeah I do think it is pretty amazing how he is moving these stone all by himself. Stonehenge I believe were 25 ton-30 ton stones..so if he could move 17 ton stones himself..then this method he is using could be possible for Stonehenge. But other megalithic I would question this method like Puma Punku for example..I think they didnt use his method on that..but a lost technology.

[Unified Serenity]

I hear you Bestlion, those are some really big rocks, but look at what this guy is doing all by himself. Imagine having hundreds of people available around the clock to work together. I just think this gives lots of room to pause. My next problem of course is dealing with cutting the rocks in Egypt wit bronze tools, that is not going to work, or the face of Pharoah so perfectly symetric on each side. But, let's remember these videos and maybe the explanations really are much more simple and today we just make things harder.

I am always reminded of America spending millions to create a pen that writes in zero gravity while the Soviets just grabbed a pencil! DUH.... problem solved simply.

[BestLion]

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.
Yes Coral Caste he didnt have a machine as this..but seemed to have a type of tractor machine..I think he there used a type of vibration-sound manipulation to place those stone.
Baalbek 1 of those stones is 1,000 tons! Just gigantic..and also a question i would have with his method which is being overlooked>
How did they transport these 50-1,000 ton stones from rock quarries sometimes 100s of miles away? Id like to see his next project on transporting a 17 ton stone say 10 miles.

[ulli]

Reminds me of the last twenty of my 40 + house moves. Although I didn't have to unload the truck nor container, the rest of it I did all by myself.
Only once did I hurt my back....used the wrong muscles when pushing a sofa, and also forgot the surface had a tile sticking out, where I expected smooth.
It's all just a matter of common sense, not even rocket science maths.

[Cartomancer]

I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.

[Cartomancer]

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.
Yes Coral Caste he didnt have a machine as this..but seemed to have a type of tractor machine..I think he there used a type of vibration-sound manipulation to place those stone.
Baalbek 1 of those stones is 1,000 tons! Just gigantic..and also a question i would have with his method which is being overlooked>
How did they transport these 50-1,000 ton stones from rock quarries sometimes 100s of miles away? Id like to see his next project on transporting a 17 ton stone say 10 miles.

Great point. In order to move stones of that magnitude more effort would go into the building of the rig than the monument itself. Kind of like the theory of a ramp being used to build the pyramids. It would have taken more effort to build and demolish the ramp itself.

I recently read an article about how the large stones at Stonehenge may have been moved on sleds over snow. I'll see if I can find that and post it.

[13th Warrior]

A possible simple solution; although an impractical method for such large construction projects.

[BestLion]

I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.
YES, and I tend to think certain monuments were build in the past 6,000 years , and other in the past 87,000 years.I do think Stonehenge is the date they say and was built by Celtic druids ..likely using a method as he is doing..But Stonehenge is a bit 'crude' in many ways if compare to other sites that i feel are much older like Giza, Puma Punku, Thus I think the modern megalithic monuments used a method as such..but most of the modern ones (BC 6,000-500 AD) have smaller stone weights, and are more crude looking. ..but the older ones 'that tend to have larger stones' used a different method.And were much finer looking.

[Cartomancer]

I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.
YES, and I tend to think certain monuments were build in the past 6,000 years , and other in the past 87,000 years.I do think Stonehenge is the date they say and was built by Celtic druids ..likely using a method as he is doing..But Stonehenge is a bit 'crude' in many ways if compare to other sites that i feel are much older like Giza, Puma Punku, Thus I think the modern megalithic monuments used a method as such..but most of the modern ones (BC 6,000-500 AD) have smaller stone weights, and are more crude looking. ..but the older ones 'that tend to have larger stones' used a different method.And were much finer looking.

True Stonehenge looks to be more crudely constructed than many other ancient sites. I have always been impressed by how the top of Stonehenge seems to be completely level. I wonder if this factor had something to do with a practical use of the structure or simply for aesthetic reasons? My thoughts were that they were making a level artificial horizon from which to measure celestial events.

[christian]

Stonehenge is placed on a ley line and set up to correspond with astrological movements, it's not far out to suspect, that they had some kind of knowledge, that has been forgotten since then. The ability to move objects through mind or sound surely exists, even simple intentional creation out of 'nothing'. It's pretty bold to claim the riddle of how Stonehenge was created is now solved.

It's nice to see how one can move a lot through being smart, though.

[Unified Serenity]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

[iceni tribe]

hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?397-Pyramid-Building-Solved

[13th Warrior]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

I believe this guy is closer to the truth than folk would care to believe. The human mind is a great tool / problem solver. And just because folk of today don't know how certain things were done then doesn't mean that Mr ET is behind all. People should give more credit to the intelligence of our ancestors.

Stonehenge was built over *4500+ thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

[Unified Serenity]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...

Yep, case closed for me. LOL

Show me something tangible to show it happened a different way, otherwise I am happy with this explaning moving some rather large objects. Of course a star trek tractor beam would be nifty! I just haven't seen one yet, have you?

¤=[Post Update]=¤


hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?397-Pyramid-Building-Solved

Thanks for sharing that! I post things currently in the news and two days later another member posts the exact same video. I don't get bothered by it. Sorry if my post bothered you bringing it up under a different thread. If the mods want to delete it or combine I don't really care at this point. Seems you do though.

[conk]

And then there is the video (can't find it at work, no youtube access) that explains the mathmatics of Coral Castle. Antigravity, simply explained. And the kicker is that the numbers and alignments can be found in Masonic temples and buildings. is that the Masonic secret, antigravity? The video has been posted here before. Wish I had the link. Very, very interesting.

Yes, it is astounding how this man moves these giant stones!

[christian]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

From a perspective of someone who is able to do telekinesis, telekinesis would be the most simple explanation probably. You could be right, but I see no concrete proof that the technique described in the videos is indeed the way it happened.


Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos.

This wouldn't convince me either ;)

[Unified Serenity]

And then there is the video (can't find it at work, no youtube access) that explains the mathmatics of Coral Castle. Antigravity, simply explained. And the kicker is that the numbers and alignments can be found in Masonic temples and buildings. is that the Masonic secret, antigravity? The video has been posted here before. Wish I had the link. Very, very interesting.

Yes, it is astounding how this man moves these giant stones!

I'd like to see which video you saw. I find these subjects fascinating. Man is quite the ingenious lil bugger isn't he?

[conk]

And then there is the video (can't find it at work, no youtube access) that explains the mathmatics of Coral Castle. Antigravity, simply explained. And the kicker is that the numbers and alignments can be found in Masonic temples and buildings. is that the Masonic secret, antigravity? The video has been posted here before. Wish I had the link. Very, very interesting.

Yes, it is astounding how this man moves these giant stones!

I'd like to see which video you saw. I find these subjects fascinating. Man is quite the ingenious lil bugger isn't he?
I think I have it bookmarked at home. I'll forward to you. Quite interesting indeed.

[13th Warrior]

I believe this guy is closer to the truth than folk would care to believe. The human mind is a great tool / problem solver. And just because folk of today don't know how certain things were done then doesn't mean that Mr ET is behind all. People should give more credit to the intelligence of our ancestors.

Stonehenge was built over a few thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

Who is to say that the newer stones aren't repairs?

Many of these ancient sites sit on top of even older structures...

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

I believe this guy is closer to the truth than folk would care to believe. The human mind is a great tool / problem solver. And just because folk of today don't know how certain things were done then doesn't mean that Mr ET is behind all. People should give more credit to the intelligence of our ancestors.

Stonehenge was built over a few thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

Who is to say that the newer stones aren't repairs?

Many of these ancient sites sit on top of even older structures...

Ie I know buddy.

[BestLion]

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...
Yeah, I'm not 100% convinced this or the other theories are correct..like the ramp theory etc on building these megalithic monuments. Like i said i have a few unanswered questions..like the precision on these huge stone, the moving them from rock quarries to the sites, the cutting of them (sorry don't buy into copper tools cutting granite, and dyarite), the placing of them "200 ton granite stones in the Kings chamber 170 ft above the ground, for example"
Like I said let a man who has a theory, cut a 1,000 ton stone, move it 50 miles, place it 100 ft up in the air with precision accuracy. And then i'll be willing to agree that 'YES THAT IS THE METHOD THEY USED TO BUILD GIZA"

hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...uilding-Solved
I read that..again I would say answer my questions above and demonstrate it and we can say case solved.

[13th Warrior]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...

Yep, case closed for me. LOL

Show me something tangible to show it happened a different way, otherwise I am happy with this explaning moving some rather large objects. Of course a star trek tractor beam would be nifty! I just haven't seen one yet, have you?

¤=[Post Update]=¤


hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?397-Pyramid-Building-Solved

Thanks for sharing that! I post things currently in the news and two days later another member posts the exact same video. I don't get bothered by it. Sorry if my post bothered you bringing it up under a different thread. If the mods want to delete it or combine I don't really care at this point. Seems you do though.

94KzmB2bI7s

[BestLion]

Great video 13th Warrior, I think that is the method they used to move , and place the 100+ ton stone..Sound vibrations. And I think they used a type of crystal to do this.Crystals are significant to understanding certain mysteries about the distant past, prior to our earliest known civilizations. It’s fairly well known that natural crystals such as quartz will give off an electrical charge when put under pressure. It has been further reported by author and investigator David Hatcher Childress that quartz crystals will also lose weight as pressure is applied, to the point that they will become completely weightless. If this is true, then we have a possible explanation for how such massive stones could have been safely transported long distances and placed with such precision within the largest and oldest megalithic structures that still stand today.
Quartz crystals are also known to concentrate and amplify energies, and this provides a possible explanation for why the ancients seemed so obsessed with tracing ley lines: apart from leading to the points where these lines cross and the energies are strongest, these lines were the paths taken when transporting these heavy objects, incorporating Earth’s energies and the natural properties of crystals into an antigravity technology.

[finally there!!!]

Very good theory but I didn't know they had concrete to rest all the blocks on back in the days when Stonehenge was made. the one thing I noticed was that he moves the blocks by having them on a flat concrete with a stone in-between the block and the base.. was there a concrete road built between the quarry and the actual Stonehenge site?

[13th Warrior]

Great video 13th Warrior, I think that is the method they used to move , and place the 100+ ton stone..Sound vibrations. And I think they used a type of crystal to do this.Crystals are significant to understanding certain mysteries about the distant past, prior to our earliest known civilizations. It’s fairly well known that natural crystals such as quartz will give off an electrical charge when put under pressure. It has been further reported by author and investigator David Hatcher Childress that quartz crystals will also lose weight as pressure is applied, to the point that they will become completely weightless. If this is true, then we have a possible explanation for how such massive stones could have been safely transported long distances and placed with such precision within the largest and oldest megalithic structures that still stand today.
Quartz crystals are also known to concentrate and amplify energies, and this provides a possible explanation for why the ancients seemed so obsessed with tracing ley lines: apart from leading to the points where these lines cross and the energies are strongest, these lines were the paths taken when transporting these heavy objects, incorporating Earth’s energies and the natural properties of crystals into an antigravity technology.

A theory that coral castle was built through the use of radio waves to make the stones lighter and easier to move.

Hr9U1cP68eU

[BestLion]

A theory that coral castle was built through the use of radio waves to make the stones lighter and easier to move.
I think the key is a sort of vibration that manipulates the weight of objects. If be a radio frequency or a type of crystal. I think both could be used. But I think the ancients had the crystal perfected on how to use it for energy, moving objects and healing. There are a number of reports that certain crystal objects, such as the crystal skull, enhance psychic abilities. They can be ‘charged’ in a variety of ways, such as with a certain emotion or an intent, or with revivifying energies, or even information. Many of these mysterious crystals are also said to reflect visions and images.
Stonehenge.. These stone structures show evidence of having been used as technological devices of some sort, concentrating and using the same natural properties of crystal line rock and the strong Earth energies found at their locations. The apparent dates of their construction are also significant, which range in the late ice age to early post-ice age period, as is their primitiveness when compared too ther, apparently much older, megaliths.

[Unified Serenity]

Boy, who says he has to have concrete to rest it on? Does he have to do everything for you? I didn't see him using concrete to move that pole barn. My point was it does not necessitate alien technology or super duper God like powers to move heavy stuff. Sheeeesh.

[Richard.P]

And then there is the video (can't find it at work, no youtube access) that explains the mathmatics of Coral Castle. Antigravity, simply explained. And the kicker is that the numbers and alignments can be found in Masonic temples and buildings. is that the Masonic secret, antigravity? The video has been posted here before. Wish I had the link. Very, very interesting.

Yes, it is astounding how this man moves these giant stones!

I'd like to see which video you saw. I find these subjects fascinating. Man is quite the ingenious lil bugger isn't he?

Try this http://www.code144.com/

[BestLion]

Boy, who says he has to have concrete to rest it on? Does he have to do everything for you? I didn't see him using concrete to move that pole barn. My point was it does not necessitate alien technology or super duper God like powers to move heavy stuff. Sheeeesh.
I went back to view 2 videos here, and yes he is using concrete ground to manipulate the stones. but that doesn't disprove his theory because many ancient sites do sit on stone surfaces or solid foundations.
I just don't buy into this was the method used to build many of the ancient megalithic monuments of old. Maybe was used for a few of the more modern monuments...but surely not the older ones. He has too many flaws in his theroy.
Anyway i am sure someone like Mr Hawass would love him..he would fit ideally in Hawass's Pyramids were build by Khufu in 2,393 BC theory! He should demonstrate this to modern Egyptology he could land a job as a fool to support their theory. He can dazzle crowds who visit and can maybe convince a few people that this was the method used.

[mountain_jim]

Waiting to learn how this was done...

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_misterios/baalbek_3.jpg

One stone left in the quarry, undressed yet. They are great, perfect rectangles.
This is a picture of the largest worked stone on earth. Some have estimated it to be 2,000 tons.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_baalbek_1.htm

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_misterios/baalbek_7.jpg

[seantimberwolf]

Sorry but i have been to Stonehenge many times,
Even now its still imposing, the stones where moved over 160 miles.
They was built around 3000BC we must remember the facts hear.
They had bronze tools back then, i have experience in archeology, and can tell you bronze tools WILL NOT cut hard granite. there are no tool marks on the huge blue stones.
In fact there are no tool marks on most of the tools, only graffiti from modern times, these blocks are 5000 years old.
Also the complete complex when fully built would have been huge, it also had advanced harmonic technology.
The estimated view is that when complete, The sound created within the structure would create waking dreams and deep relaxation.
No culture around then, especially Celtic druids, had knowledge of harmonic resonance.
We must also remember that this structure is perfectly aligned with the astrological equinoxes and are still accurate now, they have been built with the foresight of how the heavens would move.
Then we can also look at the sheer amount off crop circles found around the monument, whether one believes if they are true or not.
Some of the most complex ones which have been attributed to extra-terrestrials have been found in and around Stonehenge.
And my final comment on this subject is as follows.
Stonehenge is a marvel of construction, now the Egyptians built marvels and they built many.
If a culture has an ability to create structures of this magnitude they will do again, its not the kind of thing a nomadic, pagan race do for fun. The history is there you just have to address the REAL fact. The British isles where a Druid nomad people who had very basic social ladders and minimal technology, the Romans came AFTER their base structure of Stonehenge was built.

We must always look beyond the books that tell us what they want us to know!

[TargeT]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

except its not, in the case of Coral Castle, when it was relocated there was witness testimony of several 5-10 ton blocks being loaded onto a truck by one little man in under 2 hours.

I think you are on the right vein how ever, the answer IS very simple, we just currentlY (most of us) don't think its possible,, you just need to sheild the rock (this is why spesific stones are used IMO) from gravities forces... or slightly phase the rock out so it functions on a different rule set.

This involves magnetic fields & wave (vortex) propigation & can be done with very very simplistic tools.

This is my current theory from studying (extensively) Coral castle & trying to reproduce it myself locally (this summer maybe more fruitful, but I highly doubt it).




I'd like to see which video you saw. I find these subjects fascinating. Man is quite the ingenious lil bugger isn't he?


That link is in my signature.. the very top one ;)

[etm567]

Reminds me of the last twenty of my 40 + house moves. Although I didn't have to unload the truck nor container, the rest of it I did all by myself.
Only once did I hurt my back....used the wrong muscles when pushing a sofa, and also forgot the surface had a tile sticking out, where I expected smooth.
It's all just a matter of common sense, not even rocket science maths.

All the times I've hurt my back, I never did it while moving or lifting anything.

The first time, I was in a play -- Twelfth Night. And as I was bending over to pick up the ring in the ring scene, "What means this lady?" my back went out. I was quite young then.

The time I hurt my back the worst, I didn't even bend over. I was at work, and had gone to the toilet. As I was zipping up my jeans, I sneezed, and that was all it took. I had to crawl out of the bathroom on my hands and knees! Couldn't stand up without some kind of support to take weight off of my spine.

That was a long time ago, and I don't seem to have much trouble anymore.

You moved 40+ times? I cannot imagine living through something like that. In some kind of service? What a nightmare. Glad you had some help! Did it teach you not to develop attachments to things?

ETM

[etm567]

There's also stories of witnesses to Tibetan monks using sound to move large boulders.

From http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html

This article seems to be from a book by Bruce Cathie (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Cathie). I have seen this described someplace else, but it seems to be the same basic account.




Tibetan Sound Levitation Of Large Stones Witnessed By Scientist


Excerpt from 'Anti-gravity and the World Grid' edited by D.H.Childress, ch.8, Acoustic levitation of stones by Bruce Cathie, pp. 213-217

A New Zealand scientist recently gave me an intriguing extract from an article published in a German magazine, relating to a demonstration of levitation in Tibet. After obtaining a translation by a German journalist, in English, I was amazed at the information contained in the story, and was surprised that the article had slipped through the suppression net which tends to keep such knowledge from leaking out to the public.

...

The following extracts are translations taken from the German article: 'We know from the priests of the far east that they were able to lift heavy boulders up high mountains with the help of groups of various sounds...the knowledge of the various vibrations in the audio range demonstrates to a scientist of physics that a vibrating and condensed sound field can nullify the power of gravitation. Swedish engineer Olaf Alexanderson wrote about this phenomenon in the publication, Implosion No. 13.

The following report is based on observations which were made only 20 years ago in Tibet. I have this report from civil engineer and flight manager, Henry Kjelson, a friend of mine. He later on included this report in his book, The Lost Techniques. This is his report.

A Swedish doctor, Dr. Jarl, a friend of Kjelsons, studied at Oxford. During those times he became friends with a young Tibetan student. A couple of years later, it was 1939, Dr. Jarl made a journey to Egypt for the English Scientific Society. There he was seen by a messenger of his Tibetan friend, and urgently requested to come to Tibet to treat a high Lama.

...

One day his friend took him to a place in the neighbourhood of the monastery and showed him a sloping meadow which was surrounded in the north west by high cliffs. In one of the rock walls, at a height of about 250 metres was a big hole which looked like the entrance to a cave.

In front of this hole there was a platform on which the monks were building a rock wall. The only access to this platform was from the top of the cliff and the monks lowered themselves down with the help of ropes.

In the middle of the meadow, about 250 metres from the cliff, was a polished slab of rock with a bowl like cavity in the centre. The bowl had a diameter of one metre and a depth of 15 centimetres. A block of stone was manoeuvred into this cavity by Yak oxen. The block was one metre wide and one and one half metres long. Then 19 musical instruments were set in an arc of 90 degrees at a distance of 63 metres from the stone slab.

The radius of 63 metres was measured out accurately. The musical instruments consisted of 13 drums and 6 trumpets.(Ragdons) Eight drums had a cross-section of one metre, and a length of one and one half metres. Four drums were medium size with a cross-section of 0.7 metre and a length of one metre. The only small drum had a cross-section of 0.2 metres and a length of 0.3 metres. All the trumpets were the same size.

They had a length of 3.12 metres and an opening of 0.3 metres. The big drums and all the trumpets were fixed on mounts which could be adjusted with staffs in the direction of the slab of stone. The big drums were made of 1mm thick sheet iron, and had a weight of 150kg. They were built in five sections. All the drums were open at one end, while the other end had a bottom of metal, on which the monks beat with big leather clubs. Behind each instrument was a row of monks.

When the stone was in position the monk behind the small drum gave a signal to start the concert. The small drum had a very sharp sound, and could be heard even with the other instruments making a terrible din. All the monks were singing and chanting a prayer, slowly increasing the tempo of this unbelievable noise. During the first four minutes nothing happened, then as the speed of the drumming, and the noise, increased, the big stone block started to rock and sway, and suddenly it took off into the air with an increasing speed in the direction of the platform in front of the cave hole 250 metres high. After three minutes of ascent it landed on the platform.

Continuously they brought new blocks to the meadow, and the monks using this method, transported 5 to 6 blocks per hour on a parabolic flight track approximately 500 metres long and 250 metres high. From time to time a stone split, and the monks moved the split stones away. Quite an unbelievable task.

Dr. Jarl knew about the hurling of the stones. Tibetan experts like Linaver, Spalding and Huc had spoken about it, but they had never seen it. So Dr. Jarl was the first foreigner who had the opportunity to see this remarkable spectacle. Because he had the opinion in the beginning that he was the victim of mass-psychosis he made two films of the incident. The films showed exactly the same things that he had witnessed.

...

(more at link)

[ulli]

Reminds me of the last twenty of my 40 + house moves. Although I didn't have to unload the truck nor container, the rest of it I did all by myself.
Only once did I hurt my back....used the wrong muscles when pushing a sofa, and also forgot the surface had a tile sticking out, where I expected smooth.
It's all just a matter of common sense, not even rocket science maths.

All the times I've hurt my back, I never did it while moving or lifting anything.

The first time, I was in a play -- Twelfth Night. And as I was bending over to pick up the ring in the ring scene, "What means this lady?" my back went out. I was quite young then.

The time I hurt my back the worst, I didn't even bend over. I was at work, and had gone to the toilet. As I was zipping up my jeans, I sneezed, and that was all it took. I had to crawl out of the bathroom on my hands and knees! Couldn't stand up without some kind of support to take weight off of my spine.

That was a long time ago, and I don't seem to have much trouble anymore.

You moved 40+ times? I cannot imagine living through something like that. In some kind of service? What a nightmare. Glad you had some help! Did it teach you not to develop attachments to things?

ETM

I don't know if I would do it all over again, which is why the idea of reincarnation is not appealing.
Let's say I lived a fast-paced life. I made a lot of money when I was younger and wanted to live in better and better neighborhoods.
Changed countries, even. On arrival the first places turn out to be flawed, so one might move two or three times before committing to buy.
The attachment test was when a storage company thought they had lost all my belongings. We were then between homes. Had to live in a furnished apartment until we could buy something more suitable.
Anyway... I learnt a lot. Learnt Spanish from my construction team. I prefer to buy an old place and fix it up than build from scratch, and watch the brand-newness slowly deteriorate.
If I had become a stage designer like had been initially suggested it would have taken care of my endless moving urges.

[firstlook]

Great thread. I find it interesting the idea of how the whole process is kept under wraps. Very Freemason like. Not in the sense of sinister motives although intentions will always reveal themselves. I think that the fact that no documentation is provided by sites like these, only in metaphors or cryptic descriptions of metaphysical like attributes mixed with language barriers, makes the debate lean to-wards are more advanced ability and kept secret. Something like which is shown in these videos although incredible and deserving well of praise, do not seem to explain the secretive element of the story in all such places.

If its paradigm changing then usually the mystery is left somewhere in between what is possible and what is theorized. I'll say it again though, really great stuff.

Avalon should build a Stonehenge or pyramid in the future (with lots of documentation). :p

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

[Unified Serenity]

Sean, I posted this because for years people have said it took special technology to move for Stonehenge and we could not do it today. I think this guy demonstrated very clearly how they could be moved without highly developed technology and few people. Would it take a long time to move them that far? Probably, but could it be done? I think it could. I won't get into tools except to say the rocks at Stonehenge do not look like the ones in Egypt as per the cutting etc.. They both might be granite but the both don't look cut smoothly to me.

As for these:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_misterios/baalbek_3.jpg

I once watched a very interesting documentary regarding this goop they mixed that would soften the rock and on some that were not finished it even looked as though some sort of curved tool was used to shape the rock by scooping it way, and then it was probably smoothed at the end once it was nearly the right size. The stone was nearly this big. I looked and cannot find that documentary. I did see something posted recently about softening rock, so maybe someone found it. In that same documentary there was this talk about a white powder that somehow changed the weight of what it was put on and it reminded me of the mono atomic gold powder and it's properties and that would make sense as to why gold was so important as some have said the pyramids were possibly used to charge large things like a battery. Who knows if that is true, but it's interesting reading. I was not referring to this block btw in reference to my OP. I was referring to some of the oblisks many say we could not move today and stand upright. I do believe the techniques in the OP do show how it could be done.

As for this picture below, I think he also showed how those smaller squares could easily be raised and rolled into place. Again, my point is that so many look to the fantastic when there is a simple explanation, and I do think Stonehenge could definitely have been set up just as he shows it. Not by one person, but definitely by those techniques.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_misterios/baalbek_7.jpg

[Unified Serenity]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

[firstlook]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Yeah I can understand that, sometimes it hard to introduce a theory for considerable consideration. I never known of this information before. It should raise some valued points IMO.

Once again the issue of secrecy and what is occult (hidden) plays the major blocking stone, pun intended. I wonder why this has never been documented more throughly throughout the ages. It seems to me this process would be shared more though out the world. Interesting things to think about.

Also, I wouldn't lose any respect for things like Stonehenge if it were built in this manner.

[TargeT]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Yeah I can understand that, sometimes it hard to introduce a theory for considerable consideration. I never known of this information before. It should raise some valued points IMO.

Once again the issue of secrecy and what is occult (hidden) plays the major blocking stone, pun intended. I wonder why this has never been documented more throughly throughout the ages. It seems to me this process would be shared more though out the world. Interesting things to think about.

Also, I wouldn't lose any respect for things like Stonehenge if it were built in this manner.

its EXTENSIVELY documented if you look at masonic rights & archetecture.. the angles, the ratios... it sall there....

You have to let loose your ego a little, loosen your filters... it's not written in a language you (or I) are used to read, its in symbology & aligory & hidden in plain sight (the best way...)

OCCULT (hidden knowledge) shouldn't be thought of as a term.. we are in an OCCULT ZIETGIEST right now.. we hide knowledge FROM EVERYONE for personal gain; or we hide it from them to prevent precived personal loss, or we hold the information back just to be asses... but this is what we are taught at a young age, we are exactly as intended, now its time to fight that and become what WE intend.

Lots of GREAT info on Coral Castle here: http://www.coralcastleexplained.com/

once you understand that knowledge can be imparted in ways OTHER than language & quite often was... well here's a nice appitizer:

http://www.paranormalawarenesssociety.org/Coral%20Castle%20Ed%20Magnetic%20Current%20Book.jpg

http://www.world-mysteries.com/coral_2cclue.gif

http://www.world-mysteries.com/coral_pat1.gif

Make sense of those, read the first link in my signature (Vortex math & Nassiem Harriem's work also ties in)... the world will change (in your perception)... I see such vast potential, but unfortunately have wasted my minds fastest learning years in indoctrination boxes (excuses excuses....) & I have yet to complete any thing useful from this info :(

[etm567]

If I had become a stage designer like had been initially suggested it would have taken care of my endless moving urges.

Do we have the theater in common, then? (Is such an off topic question allowed?)

[etm567]

Here's some real acoustic levitation. The sound is quite unpleasant, but it is being done by scientists.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94KzmB2bI7s&feature=player_embedded#!

[firstlook]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Yeah I can understand that, sometimes it hard to introduce a theory for considerable consideration. I never known of this information before. It should raise some valued points IMO.

Once again the issue of secrecy and what is occult (hidden) plays the major blocking stone, pun intended. I wonder why this has never been documented more throughly throughout the ages. It seems to me this process would be shared more though out the world. Interesting things to think about.

Also, I wouldn't lose any respect for things like Stonehenge if it were built in this manner.

its EXTENSIVELY documented if you look at masonic rights & archetecture.. the angles, the ratios... it sall there....

You have to let loose your ego a little, loosen your filters... it's not written in a language you (or I) are used to read, its in symbology & aligory & hidden in plain sight (the best way...)

OCCULT (hidden knowledge) shouldn't be thought of as a term.. we are in an OCCULT ZIETGIEST right now.. we hide knowledge FROM EVERYONE for personal gain; or we hide it from them to prevent precived personal loss, or we hold the information back just to be asses... but this is what we are taught at a young age, we are exactly as intended, now its time to fight that and become what WE intend.

Lots of GREAT info on Coral Castle here: http://www.coralcastleexplained.com/

once you understand that knowledge can be imparted in ways OTHER than language & quite often was... well here's a nice appitizer:

http://www.paranormalawarenesssociety.org/Coral%20Castle%20Ed%20Magnetic%20Current%20Book.jpg

http://www.world-mysteries.com/coral_2cclue.gif

http://www.world-mysteries.com/coral_pat1.gif

Make sense of those, read the first link in my signature (Vortex math & Nassiem Harriem's work also ties in)... the world will change (in your perception)... I see such vast potential, but unfortunately have wasted my minds fastest learning years in indoctrination boxes (excuses excuses....) & I have yet to complete any thing useful from this info :(

I have read these works. It's still being processed. Intuitively I know these methods to hold weight. Its just a matter of implying what is history and what is future. I cannot confirm the events that I have no complete conclusion to. Although I hold all of it equally. And I do mean equally.

I believe that whether or not methods of sound(vibration) and gravity were the sole cause of many of these structures, they should be. Meaning it is the next logical step for mainstream progression and should we move past what could have been, we will realize what can be and most certainly is needed. Nassim broke my isolated ;) ideas of just what is stationary in current methods of organization, thus construction and science.

I wish I could put these methods to work and had the resources to prove them useful for all....and free. :)

[Unified Serenity]

I'm open to all ideas really. I liked the video in the OP due to reasons stated. I think my main issue is the idea that its gotta be some incredible "out there" technology when it really doesn't imho. Too many people are making things way to supernatural and/or God intervening to do some incredible work like moving a 100,000 ton rock. It's probably so easy a child could do it. I will read that link. Thanks for showing it.

Imagine if we all just woke up to the truth that we are amazing just as we are today, no ascending, no needing some great savior, just US. Just a simple truth of knowing some of this stuff could change our world for the better. It's out there, and maybe we can connect in that.

Serenity

[CeltMan]

Thanks U.S.-Thought provoking indeed.

I admit that I can perceive of Both hypotheses.

1) Re ‘use of advanced technology’, there was a recent post (anyone recall who/when/where?) that linked to a vid. This was showing Tibetan monks, levitating a Huge piece of rock, across a plain, and up onto a narrow inaccessible ledge on a mountain. This was part of a shelter, being constructed.

They were standing in a circle, chanting, and large gongs were being ‘played’.
The implication was that there was ‘sophisticated use of advanced sound technology’ being applied.

My opinion is that we humans have had access to such advanced technologies in our distant past.

This begs the question: “Chicken & egg’?
Did we develop naturally, or were we ‘pushed’ by alien intervention?

2) Re Human ingenuity: I do believe that we are capable of far more than we give ourselves credit for.

IMO, this fellow demonstrated: creative ability; ability to ‘think outside the box’; a very Positive-‘can do attitude’; perseverance; a highly developed ability to ‘problem solve’; a lot of common sense; a basic grasp of physics principles.

I would like to have seen how he lifted that top horizontal beam into place?

I admit a bias here, as I am a problem solver, also an inventor(9 at last count)
Being candid, I can say that about 60% of my inventions were ‘inspiration’, the rest were perseverance + application of a trained technique.(asking: who; what; where; when; + why etc-this was my first profession, + ‘Materials Handling’)

I have also been involved in two practical situations where a little application of common sense and basic grasp of physics principles, saved the day.

One such was intervening when a few men/colleagues- were attempting to manipulate a huge oil container down a steep slope. I watched for a few minutes, saw that they had no clue what they were doing, and that ‘it was an accident waiting to happen’.

At first my intervention was not welcomed, but the I.C. eventually agreed.
I applied basic common sense.
Getting three men to stand at front, with large poles/tree trunks, angled as ‘brakes’
Then laying 2 poles underneath-horizontally, and moving these as the container moved slowly downhill.

The other was when I was witness to a large ‘export container’ being stuck in a narrow lane, and about to topple into a 7ft ditch. (he had taken the wrong turning trying to find the farm, next door where we were awaiting his arrival.)
This was in a December, in sub zero temperatures, with ice + snow.

I watched to see if the 6 others knew what they were doing. No. So I ‘took over’, organising some of the labourers to fetch dried kindling from the hedgerows, place under wheels, + sacks from the waggon.

The outcome was a success. I received a brace of pheasants + a bottle of scotch from the farm owner, not requested, but gratefully received none the less.

I also firmly believe that the present school/education does not encourage ‘creative thinking or problem solving’. But that is only my opinion.

[Unified Serenity]

I also firmly believe that the present school/education does not encourage ‘creative thinking or problem solving’. But that is only my opinion.

Amen to that Celtman! I think it's intended this way. They are meant to be cogs in a wheel, don't think, accept what we tell you, and follow the path we put in front of you like a good little citizen.

[BestLion]

Tibetan Sound Levitation Of Large Stones Witnessed By Scientist
http://www.crystalinks.com/levitationtibet.html
Excerpt from 'Anti-gravity and the World Grid' edited by D.H.Childress, ch.8, Acoustic levitation of stones by Bruce Cathie, pp. 213-217

A New Zealand scientist recently gave me an intriguing extract from an article published in a German magazine, relating to a demonstration of levitation in Tibet. After obtaining a translation by a German journalist, in English, I was amazed at the information contained in the story, and was surprised that the article had slipped through the suppression net which tends to keep such knowledge from leaking out to the public.

All the similar types of stories that I had read up until now were generally devoid of specific information necessary to prove the veracity of the account. In this case a full set of geometric measurements were taken, and I discovered, to my great delight, that when they were converted to their equivalent geodetic measures, relating to grid harmonics the values gave a direct association with those in the unified harmonic equations published in my earlier works.

The following extracts are translations taken from the German article: 'We know from the priests of the far east that they were able to lift heavy boulders up high mountains with the help of groups of various sounds...the knowledge of the various vibrations in the audio range demonstrates to a scientist of physics that a vibrating and condensed sound field can nullify the power of gravitation. Swedish engineer Olaf Alexanderson wrote about this phenomenon in the publication, Implosion No. 13.

The following report is based on observations which were made only 20 years ago in Tibet. I have this report from civil engineer and flight manager, Henry Kjelson, a friend of mine. He later on included this report in his book, The Lost Techniques. This is his report.

A Swedish doctor, Dr. Jarl, a friend of Kjelsons, studied at Oxford. During those times he became friends with a young Tibetan student. A couple of years later, it was 1939, Dr. Jarl made a journey to Egypt for the English Scientific Society. There he was seen by a messenger of his Tibetan friend, and urgently requested to come to Tibet to treat a high Lama.

After Dr. Jarl got the leave he followed the messenger and arrived after a long journey by plane and Yak caravans, at the monastery, where the old Lama and his friend who was now holding a high position were now living.

Dr. Jarl stayed there for some time, and because of his friendship with the Tibetans he learned a lot of things that other foreigners had no chance to hear about or observe.

One day his friend took him to a place in the neighbourhood of the monastery and showed him a sloping meadow which was surrounded in the north west by high cliffs. In one of the rock walls, at a height of about 250 metres was a big hole which looked like the entrance to a cave.

In front of this hole there was a platform on which the monks were building a rock wall. The only access to this platform was from the top of the cliff and the monks lowered themselves down with the help of ropes.

In the middle of the meadow, about 250 metres from the cliff, was a polished slab of rock with a bowl like cavity in the centre. The bowl had a diameter of one metre and a depth of 15 centimetres. A block of stone was manoeuvred into this cavity by Yak oxen. The block was one metre wide and one and one half metres long. Then 19 musical instruments were set in an arc of 90 degrees at a distance of 63 metres from the stone slab.

The radius of 63 metres was measured out accurately. The musical instruments consisted of 13 drums and 6 trumpets.(Ragdons) Eight drums had a cross-section of one metre, and a length of one and one half metres. Four drums were medium size with a cross-section of 0.7 metre and a length of one metre. The only small drum had a cross-section of 0.2 metres and a length of 0.3 metres. All the trumpets were the same size.

They had a length of 3.12 metres and an opening of 0.3 metres. The big drums and all the trumpets were fixed on mounts which could be adjusted with staffs in the direction of the slab of stone. The big drums were made of 1mm thick sheet iron, and had a weight of 150kg. They were built in five sections. All the drums were open at one end, while the other end had a bottom of metal, on which the monks beat with big leather clubs. Behind each instrument was a row of monks.

When the stone was in position the monk behind the small drum gave a signal to start the concert. The small drum had a very sharp sound, and could be heard even with the other instruments making a terrible din. All the monks were singing and chanting a prayer, slowly increasing the tempo of this unbelievable noise. During the first four minutes nothing happened, then as the speed of the drumming, and the noise, increased, the big stone block started to rock and sway, and suddenly it took off into the air with an increasing speed in the direction of the platform in front of the cave hole 250 metres high. After three minutes of ascent it landed on the platform.

Continuously they brought new blocks to the meadow, and the monks using this method, transported 5 to 6 blocks per hour on a parabolic flight track approximately 500 metres long and 250 metres high. From time to time a stone split, and the monks moved the split stones away. Quite an unbelievable task.

Dr. Jarl knew about the hurling of the stones. Tibetan experts like Linaver, Spalding and Huc had spoken about it, but they had never seen it. So Dr. Jarl was the first foreigner who had the opportunity to see this remarkable spectacle. Because he had the opinion in the beginning that he was the victim of mass-psychosis he made two films of the incident. The films showed exactly the same things that he had witnessed.

The English Society for which Dr. Jarl was working confiscated the two films and declared them classified. They will not be released until 1990. This action is rather hard to explain, or understand.: End of trans.'

The fact that the films were immediately classified is not very hard to understand once the given measurements are transposed into their geometric equivalents. It then becomes evident that the monks in Tibet are fully conversant with the laws governing the structure of matter, which the scientists in the modern day western world are now frantically exploring. It appears, from the calculations, that the prayers being chanted by the monks did not have any direct bearing on the fact that the stones were levitated from the ground.

The reaction was not initiated by the religious fervour of the group, but by the superior scientific knowledge held by the high priests. The secret is in the geometric placement of the musical instruments in relation to the stones to be levitated, and the harmonic tuning of the drums and trumpets. The combined loud chanting of the priests using their voices at a certain pitch and rhythm most probably adds to the combined effect, but the subject matter of the chant, I believe, would be of no consequence.

The sound waves being generated by the combination were directed in such a way that an anti-gravitational effect was created at the centre of focus (position of the stones) and around the periphery, or the arc, of a third of a circle through which the stones moved.

If we analyse the diagram published with the original article, then compare it with the modified diagram, we become aware of the following coordinates, and the implications, when compared with my previously published works.

The distance between the stone block and the central pivot of the drum supports is shown as 63 metres. The large drums were said to be one and one half metres long, so the distance from the block to the rear face of each drum could be close to 63.75 metres considering that the pivot point would be near the centre of balance.

My theoretical analysis, by calculator, indicates that the exact distance would be 63.7079 metres for the optimum harmonic reaction. By mathematical conversion we find that this value is equal to 206.2648062 geodetic feet, which is harmonically equal to the length of the earths radius in seconds of arc (relative to the earths surface) 206264.8062. This also leads us to the following associations:

(206.2648062 x 2) = 412.5296124 This number squared = 170180.68 which is the theoretical harmonic of mass at the earths surface.

The four rows of monks standing behind the instruments in a quarter circle added to the production of sound by their loud chanting and must be taken in to account in regards to the geometric pattern. If we assume that they were standing approximately two feet apart, we can add a calculated value of 8.08865 geodetic feet to the radius of the complete group. This gives a maximum radius of: 214.3534583 geodetic feet.

The circumference of a complete circle with this radius would be: 1346.822499 geodetic feet.

Which is a half harmonic of 2693.645 (unified field)

The distance from the stone block to a calculated point within the cliff face and the height of the ledge on the cliff face from ground level is given as 250 metres. If we can now imagine that the raised stone blocks pass through a quarter arc of a circle during their flight from ground level to the hole in the cliff face, then the pivot point of the radius would be coincident with this position.

The theoretical radius was found to be: 249.8767262 metres which very closely approximates the estimate. This converts to 809.016999 geodetic feet. The diameter of the full circle would therefore be: 1618.034 geodetic feet.

A circle with this diameter has a circumference of 5083.203728 units, which can be divided into three even lengths of 1694.4 It therefore appears that the levitated blocks, once resonated to a certain frequency, would tend to carry out a flight path that is coincident to one third of a circle. The spacial distance being equivalent to the mass harmonic at the center of a light field, 1694443.

The instruments used by the group, in theory, would also have been tuned to produce harmonic wave forms associated with the unified fields. The given measurements are in rounded off parts of a metre but in practice some slight variations from these measurements would be expected in order to create the appropriate resonating cavities within the instruments

The geometric arrangement, and the number of instruments in the group would also be a most important factor.

If the given measurement for each type of drum is modified fractionally and converted to its geometric equivalent an interesting value for the cubic capacity is evident.

The large drums:

1.517201563 metres long, 1.000721361 metres wide = 58.94627524 geodetic inches long, 38.88 geodetic inches wide = 69984 cubic inches capacity = 40.5 cubic geodetic feet capacity.

Therefore the cubic capacity for eight drums = 324 cubic geodetic feet This harmonic value is built into the world grid and is equal to half the harmonic 648.

The medium size drums:

1.000721361 metres long, 0.695189635 metres wide = 38.88 geodetic inches long, 27.00948944 geodetic inches wide = 22276.59899 cubic geodetic inches capacity = 12.89155034 cubic geodetic feet capacity.

Therefore the cubic capacity for four drums: = 51.56620136 cubic geodetic feet

14.97414932 centimetres = 5.895334377 inches = 5.817764187 geodetic inches = 0.484813682 geodetic feet

As the dish-shape was focused upward towards the stone block to be levitated it would be expected that some type of reaction would take place which had an effect on the mass. The geometric shape of the cavity does seem to be engineered in such a way the projected frequency vortex causes a reciprocal reaction to the mass harmonic of each block. The reciprocal of 0.484813682 = 2.062648055 Twice this value: = 4.12529611 The square of this value: = 17.018068 (the harmonic of mass at the earth's surface.17018068

I believe that there is not much doubt that the Tibetans had possession of the secrets relating to the geometric structure of matter, and the methods of manipulating the harmonic values, but if we can grasp the mathematical theory behind the incident, and extend the application, then an even more fascinating idea presents itself.

[CeltMan]

Thanks for that B.L.

It does seem to illustrate, that in remote places, like the Himilayas, that a civilisation, can manage to pass down ancient knowledge, when uninterupted by the current society and its belief systems. (apart from the 'recent intervention by the Chinese government'!)

But, I still believe that if we only 'can learn to think outside the box', a lot of us at least can achieve great things.

So, where do we start with that one?...Hmm, with ourselves, and those around us, our partners, friends, close family etc,...leading by example.

I have tried to pass on such thinking to both my kids(now grown) and more recently to my grandchildren. The oldest, aged 9, I encourage to 'question', and 'look beyond the obvious'. 'Little acorns', etc etc.....lol!

P.S. However, not wishing to 'go off topic' here, but in my long experience, a lot of people do NOT want to 'hear the Truth' (this could also be applied to a lot of the other threads being discussed here at P.A. Where most of us have come across, in the Big wide World- a 'blinkered way of thinking' about life as we know it etc)

[TargeT]

Imagine if we all just woke up to the truth that we are amazing just as we are today, no ascending, no needing some great savior, just US. Just a simple truth of knowing some of this stuff could change our world for the better. It's out there, and maybe we can connect in that.

Serenity

maybe that "IS" all that "accention" really "is" .... its just a realization of what "is"

much like the "end of the world" can be taken MANY ways... it can be as simple as "the end of the way things were done" or something as complex as "the world is destroyed"....

Any assumption should be questioned :)



"Question EVERYTHING, always."


Wait, i edited one of my posts? *(shock)*



Thanks for that B.L.

It does seem to illustrate, that in remote places, like the Himilayas, that a civilisation, can manage to pass down ancient knowledge, when uninterupted by the current society and its belief systems. (apart from the 'recent intervention by the Chinese government'!)

But, I still believe that if we only 'can learn to think outside the box', a lot of us at least can achieve great things.

So, where do we start with that one?...Hmm, with ourselves, and those around us, our partners, friends, close family etc,...leading by example.

I have tried to pass on such thinking to both my kids(now grown) and more recently to my grandchildren. The oldest, aged 9, I encourage to 'question', and 'look beyond the obvious'. 'Little acorns', etc etc.....lol!

check out www.triviumeducation.com for the young ones... might as well teach them to think while your at it (you might enjoy it as well).

This is exactly what I think is happening in larger and larger numbers... "home grown" awareness growth people "being the change" they want... excelent!

[WhiteFeather]

Great Post US: I found this perspective on Pyramid Building from The Law Of One Ra Series Interesting, Perhaps The God's/Elders/Ancients etc. Utilized This Technique In Other Like Structures as well. Who really knows the true answers for sure! But For me personally I could not see how these blocks were carved out of a quarry, floated down the nile river on a wooden raft, dragged across the sand, and after it was constructed it was aligned perfectly mirrored to The Stars Of Orions Belt.

Some Interesting Read, if you haven't read The Law Of One Series, Enjoy This Peeps.



Law Of One Series:

Questioner: How were the blocks moved?

Ra: I am Ra. You must picture the activity within all that is created. The energy is, though finite, quite large compared to the understanding/distortion of your peoples. This is an obvious point well known to your peoples, but little considered.

This energy is intelligent. It is hierarchical. Much as your mind/body/spirit complex dwells within an hierarchy of vehicles and retains, therefore, the shell, or shape, or field, and the intelligence of each ascendingly intelligent or balanced body, so does each atom of such a material as rock. When one can speak to that intelligence, the finite energy of the physical, or chemical, rock/body is put into contact with that infinite power which is resident in the more well-tuned bodies, be they human or rock.

With this connection made, a request may be given. The intelligence of infinite rock-ness communicates to its physical vehicle and that splitting and moving which is desired is then carried out through the displacement of the energy field of rockness from finity to a dimension which we may conveniently call, simply, infinity.

In this way, that which is required is accomplished due to a cooperation of the infinite understanding of the Creator indwelling in the living rock. This is, of course, the mechanism by which many things are accomplished which are not subject to your present means of physical analysis of action at a distance.


Questioner: What is a balancing pyramid?

Ra: I am Ra. Imagine, if you will, the many force fields of the Earth in their geometrically precise web. Energies stream into the Earth planes, as you would call them, from magnetically determined points. Due to growing thought-form distortions in understanding of the Law of One, the planet itself was seen to have the potential for imbalance. The balancing pyramidal structures were charged with crystals which drew the appropriate balance from the energy forces streaming into the various geometrical centers of electromagnetic energy which surround and shape the planetary sphere.

Questioner: Did the balancing pyramid prevent the Earth from changing its axis?
Ra: I am Ra. This query is not clear. Please restate.

Questioner: Does the balancing refer to the individual who is initiated in the pyramid or does it refer to the physical balancing of the Earth on its axis in space?
Ra: I am Ra. The balancing pyramidal structures could be and were used for individual initiation. However, the use of these pyramids was also designed for the balancing of the planetary energy web. The other pyramids are not placed correctly for Earth healing but for healing of mind/body/spirit complexes. It came to our attention that your density was distorted towards, what is called by our distortion/understanding of third density on your planetary sphere, more of a time/space continuum in one incarnation pattern in order to have a fuller opportunity to learn/teach the Laws or Ways of the primal distortion of the Law of One which is Love.

Questioner: I want to make this statement and you tell me if I am correct. The balancing pyramids were to do what we call increase the life span of entities here so that they would gain more wisdom of the Law of One while they were in the physical at one time. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. However, the pyramids not called by us by the vibrational sound complex, balancing pyramids, were more numerous and were used exclusively for the above purpose and the teach/learning of healers to charge and enable these processes.

More Here: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?category=Pyramids&sc=1

[firstlook]

I'm open to all ideas really. I liked the video in the OP due to reasons stated. I think my main issue is the idea that its gotta be some incredible "out there" technology when it really doesn't imho. Too many people are making things way to supernatural and/or God intervening to do some incredible work like moving a 100,000 ton rock. It's probably so easy a child could do it. I will read that link. Thanks for showing it.

Imagine if we all just woke up to the truth that we are amazing just as we are today, no ascending, no needing some great savior, just US. Just a simple truth of knowing some of this stuff could change our world for the better. It's out there, and maybe we can connect in that.

Serenity

Yes, but i think alot of the evidence supports good science. Its not just Belief. Patterns of Light, DNA, and stuff like healing frequencies are proven to be legit by people like Bruce Lipton and Dr. Horowitz. We no so little and yet many of these theories regarding physics have more so to do with reality then faith.

It doesn't have to be incredible. But Things point that way, and every feet of accomplishment is incredible too. Supernatural is just the unexplainable which science hasn't discovered how to quantize and measure. People just tend to give these things the best explanation they can come up with based on their perception and vocabulary.

Just some thoughts.

[Snoweagle]

So what? I have moved 20 ton machine tools albeit with metal jacks and rods. Civil engineers know this can be done. It is the time scale that doesn't marry.
Furthermore, ANYBODY who considers the pyramids were built 5000BC are retards:-)

Cheops broke into into the famous "cheops" pyramid and during the excavation removed the "Arc of the Covenant". Not realising what it was his men removed it and "shorted" it. It is a superconductor of immense power. It was then that the granite ceiling "cracked" and reported as being heard during that period. Furthermore the main gallery contained an array of some kind which was also removed. That occurred 2500yrsBC
All around the world civilisations experienced major collapses around the period of 2500yrs BC
Work stopped at Stonehenge which had had a similar superconductor device of some sort which was placed on the "altar" stone.
The ancient cities in Mexico were also evacuated around the same time as in Cambodia, everywhere was effected by this. And we have suffered ever since.

Oh and by the way, you are going to love this. Moses and the twelve families who were on the Exodus, heard news the Pharoah had died; travelled back to "Giza" with an entourage of priests in tow to pay homage. Then Moses and his gang nicked the Arc of the Covenant from the secret place it was being held with supporting secret mystery scolls and such like.
Read the "Subbah, an alternative exodus". Its in the Bible though clearly presented with the god bush flame thang. Why do you think the walls of Jericho collapsed after seven days of trumpeting? Why do you think Moses cracked the rock and water gushed forth? Why do you think the thousands of rebelling throng, especially the priests were massacred to shut them up, "the ground enveloped them", really sounds like amplification of the harmonics generated in proxmity of the super conductor.

Why do you think the dimensions of the Temple of Solomon mimicked dimensions in the Pyramids?

C'mon people wake the furk up!

[Unified Serenity]

So what? I have moved 20 ton machine tools albeit with metal jacks and rods. Civil engineers know this can be done. It is the time scale that doesn't marry.
Furthermore, ANYBODY who considers the pyramids were built 5000BC are retards:-)

Cheops broke into into the famous "cheops" pyramid and during the excavation removed the "Arc of the Covenant". Not realising what it was his men removed it and "shorted" it. It is a superconductor of immense power. It was then that the granite ceiling "cracked" and reported as being heard during that period. Furthermore the main gallery contained an array of some kind which was also removed. That occurred 2500yrsBC
All around the world civilisations experienced major collapses around the period of 2500yrs BC
Work stopped at Stonehenge which had had a similar superconductor device of some sort which was placed on the "altar" stone.
The ancient cities in Mexico were also evacuated around the same time as in Cambodia, everywhere was effected by this. And we have suffered ever since.

Oh and by the way, you are going to love this. Moses and the twelve families who were on the Exodus, heard news the Pharoah had died; travelled back to "Giza" with an entourage of priests in tow to pay homage. Then Moses and his gang nicked the Arc of the Covenant from the secret place it was being held with supporting secret mystery scolls and such like.
Read the "Subbah, an alternative exodus". Its in the Bible though clearly presented with the god bush flame thang. Why do you think the walls of Jericho collapsed after seven days of trumpeting? Why do you think Moses cracked the rock and water gushed forth? Why do you think the thousands of rebelling throng, especially the priests were massacred to shut them up, "the ground enveloped them", really sounds like amplification of the harmonics generated in proxmity of the super conductor.

Why do you think the dimensions of the Temple of Solomon mimicked dimensions in the Pyramids?

C'mon people wake the furk up!

Snoweagle, my post is NOT about the pyramids. :rolleyes:

It's about Stonehenge and structures like it.

[WhiteFeather]

Best lion, your above post was awesome.

[DNA]

Wow, this is good stuff US. Thank You very much. :)

[Referee]

Nice post US however Some of the stones are much much biger up 150 tons also It dosen't explain the carving of Granite and other very hrd rocks with sergical percision.

Best Regards,

[BestLion]

Cheops broke into into the famous "cheops" pyramid and during the excavation removed the "Arc of the Covenant". Not realising what it was his men removed it and "shorted" it. It is a superconductor of immense power. It was then that the granite ceiling "cracked" and reported as being heard during that period. Furthermore the main gallery contained an array of some kind which was also removed. That occurred 2500yrsBC
This is a theory. i have spent 100s of hours in the study of past civilizations, from Hittites , Celtics, Sumerians, Jews, you name it. In the year 2,500 BC the only civilization that had a knowledgeable type system was the Celts..And the Celts were also said to have went and brought culture to Egypt "this is a theory" and it is much explored by Michael Tsarion extensively.

Furthermore, ANYBODY who considers the pyramids were built 5000BC are retards:-)
Well all we can do is research for ourselves, and each man can build his own conclusions. I for one do not find enough compelling evidence to support the 2,400 BC date of construction of Giza. It is inclusive.Likely as you said Khufu more less just reentered this monument about the time of 2,400 BC.

All around the world civilisations experienced major collapses around the period of 2500yrs BC
This can be an entire thread of itself. Modern view is this was about the time when civilization sparked and started. I have spent much time on study of a possible collapse of civilization in this time-frame. But the problem with this is around 2,500 BC we didn't have many civilizations..about 9 known then. "At 500 BC we had 24 known civilizations"

The ancient cities in Mexico were also evacuated around the same time as in Cambodia, everywhere was effected by this
Very possible. Michael Tsarion sort of takes this theory also. This was about the time of the 1st Celtic collapse also.

Then Moses and his gang nicked the Arc of the Covenant f
I'm more of the opinion that it was a sort of communication device that could contact this demigod Elohim.

Nice post US however Some of the stones are much much biger up 150 tons also It dosen't explain the carving of Granite and other very hrd rocks with sergical percision.
Yes..that is a mystery. Puma Punku have stone made of diorite, that is so hard can only be cut with diamond.Diorite is an extremely hard rock, making it difficult to carve and work with. Its hardness, however, also allows it to be worked finely and take a high polish, and to provide a durable finished work.Not only were these stones really hard to cut, but they are also extremely heavy. One of these stone ruins weighs in at about 800 tons! These are big stones, and they are really heavy. The nearest quarry is at least 10 miles away from the site of the ruins of Puma Punku. How in the world did these people move these blocks that weighed many tons, and how were they able to form a structure with them?

[Unified Serenity]

None of the stones at Stonehenge look like they are surgically precise unless its those on top, and then it's still doesn't look that precise, but ok.

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

None of the stones at Stonehenge look like they are surgically precise unless its those on top, and then it's still doesn't look that precise, but ok.

Hi.
My comment on the first page #18 may explain this.

Stonehenge was built over *4500+ thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

[Unified Serenity]

Funny, the one's in Egypt still look nice n flat.

[freebird111777]

Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

[13th Warrior]

Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

[buckminster fuller]

Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?

I seriously have doubts, considering slopes and the nature of the terrain, which is not a flat concrete slab as we see in the vid... Nice ideas there, but I agree that it is not enough to explain it all, especially the lifting..

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Funny, the one's in Egypt still look nice n flat.

Hi,
The ones in Egypt where buried for how ever long. The weather conditions in Egypt are totally different to Britain. A lot of the monument's in Egypt have also been repaired & tarted up since Napoleon times with a vast amount of ££££ being spent on preserving sites.

Stonehenge was a smashed up wrecked until the last century. Repairs are still ongoing.
I look out of my window I can see the Mynydd Y Preseli / Preseli Mountains where the blue stones came from. I am also surrounded by ancient weathered structures which have been & still are abused by the English heritage trust that claims to be protecting them. Ironic seeing that the English heritage trust is in charge of protecting sites in Cymru, which is a different country btw.

Strange how you can claim that "Stonehenge and Coral Castle building solved" but you refuse to acknowledge on how over 4500+ thousand years of bad weather & vandalism may have altered the appearance of these stones & structures.

[ceetee9]

I'm surprised US that you would consider the "case closed" based upon such minimal data. I realize you’re thread addresses only Stonehenge and Coral Castle, but many of the stone blocks used to create some of the ancient sites around the world were 100 to 1000 tons—which would require today’s largest cranes to lift, were made of granite and even diorite—which require diamond cutting tools to cut, were cut and placed together with extreme precision, and were quarried from locations up to several hundred miles away from the ruins site. These are hardly feats that could be accomplished by man using wood levers, rollers and ropes.

Consider Puma Punku for instance, the blocks were quarried 10 miles from the ruins, were made of granite and diorite, weighed up to 800 tons each, and were aligned with precision that would be hard to duplicate with today’s technology:
http://daveearley.hubpages.com/hub/Ancient-Mysteries-Puma-Punku-in-Tiahuanaco

[Carmody]

Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

[Khaleesi]

I don't think Serenity considers it case closed. Just that this could be one explanation of many.

[mountain_jim]

I don't think Serenity considers it case closed. Just that this could be one explanation of many.

The very thread title clearly implies 'case closed'.

[mountain_jim]

Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

Whose work I was introduced to and explained by that noted (around some of these parts) value-not-added compiler of other people's research, David Wilcock.

[Khaleesi]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Guess you missed that post.

[mountain_jim]

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate. :)

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Guess you missed that post.

And several more, all discussing validity or intent of thread title. :)

I scanned too quickly. If thread titles can be changed, this one should be, to convey author's real intent - well unless stirring the pot and being provocative was the intent.

And I admit I should not have commented if/when I don't have the whole thread content well in hand.

[goinghome2012]

if you don't know it yet, the pyramids, coral castle and even the huge rocks on Easter Island were moved my magnetics, sound vibration and/or alien technology ant-gravity. come on people I thought that information was a given, especially at today's date and year.

peace out

[TargeT]

Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

From my current understanding of the methods POSSIBILY (probably) used, this really wasn't that big of an under taking (the construction) the bigger undertaking was the initial design and the VAST amounts of universal understanding that it entailed..... the work is, well interesting, but the REAL jewl are the ideas (as always).



Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

^^ this is kinda what I was getting at ;)

Nikolai Kozyrev:
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=95&Itemid=36

[mountain_jim]

Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

From my current understanding of the methods POSSIBILY (probably) used, this really wasn't that big of an under taking (the construction) the bigger undertaking was the initial design and the VAST amounts of universal understanding that it entailed..... the work is, well interesting, but the REAL jewl are the ideas (as always).



Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

^^ this is kinda what I was getting at ;)

Nikolai Kozyrev:
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=95&Itemid=36

Great link. I did not realize he had this much detail available online. Here are the references to this synthesis of ideas/research:



REFERENCES:

1.Akimov, A.E. and Shipov, G.I. Torsion Fields and their Experimental Manifestations. Proceedings of International Conference: New Ideas in Natural Science, 1996.
2.Anonymous. (Amount of vaccuum space in light bulb) {Link no longer in operation 6/02}:
3.Fox, Hal. Now Come Torsion Fields. NEN, Vol. 5, No. 11, Mar. 1998, p.1. URL:
4.Gamow, George. Gravity. Anchor Books, NY, 1962; p. 138.Keely, John. Sympathetic Vibratory Physics.
5.Kozyrev, N.A. On the Potential for Experimental Investigation of the Properties of Time. 1971.
6.Levich, A.P. A Substantial Interpretation of N.A. Kozyrev’s Conception of Time. Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong: World Scientific, 1996, p. 1-42.
7.Lyne, William. Occult Ether Physics. Creatopia Productions, NM, 1997. ISBN: 0-9637467-2-3
8.Nachalov, Yu.V. Theoretical Basics of Experimental Phenomena.
9.Nachalov, Yu.V. and Parkhomov, E.A. Experimental Detection of the Torsion Field.
10.Nachalov, Yu.V. and Sokolov, A.N. Experimental Investigation of New Long-Range Actions. 1993.
11.Ostrander, S. and Schroeder, L. Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.
12.Pasichnyk, Richard. The Vital Vastness: Volume One. Writer’s Showcase, 2002.
13.Russell, Walter. The Divine Iliad. University of Science and Philosophy
14.Taubes, Gary. Relativists in Orbit. Discover Magazine, March 1997.
15.Tesla, Nikola. Lecture Before the Institute of Immigrant Welfare. May 12, 1938.
16.Wilcock, David. Science of OnenessI. April, 2001. URL:
17.Wright, Walter. Push Gravity



I have a paperback copy of this one I bought 39 years ago: Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.

[Unified Serenity]

Ok, my one obscure comment for the day, why does anyone care if I think a case is closed? What's it matter? If it's not to you then it's not to you. I really have not made up my mind completely, but I am just tired of the pissant attacks I get, so I took that stand to basically end that side of the banter. Have fun all, I am pretty much done with posting any relevent thoughts or questioning anything or posting anything on PA.

There are two sets of rules here, that's obvious, and I don't have to play ball. For some that will be great news, for others that will not. So be it. I will go where I am allowed to at least think, ask, and seek without being attacked by ad hominem posts whenever someone doesn't like my viewpoint, which is nearly everytime I type something.

The end.

Serenity

[trivesten]

Coral Castle, an impressive stone structure built by Edward Leedskalnin, south of Miami in Florida. Not surprisingly, Coral Castle has continued to mystify modern scientists as to the method used in its construction.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o15_DQUm94s

:peep: I ran across this video and thought that it would fit in this post nicely... enjoy.. cheers everyone :focus:

:neo:

[Cartomancer]

Here's a video I made about some strange associations with Coral Castle. This info ties Cora Castle into a grid of monuments that I have identified. It may have been built as part of the Templum of the Vatican as defined by the Egyptian obelisk and surrounding windrose markers. Watch video. Thanks.

aCUr7QCsz78

[Straker]

I did some research into Coral Castle in 2004 and came up with a few revelations regarding what Leedskalnin was possibly doing and what the sweet sixteen really was.

There is a disk hanging up in his workshop, very faded now, but I could still decipher the markings in photoshop, once I pulled the contrast and levels.

It was basically a translucent plastic disk, with a horizon line drawn on it, and a path showing the angle of the sun and moon. I noticed around the outside that there were increments (degrees) and that he had marked the 16th degree point with a marker or something.

What I think he was doing, was charting the passage of the moon and sun, and waiting for the sweet spot, when both the sun and moon were on the same side (the gravity pull is less).

In his "Book in every home" it is widely accepted that he left one page blank opposite each page of text, and invites the reader to basically work out the coded message within that book.

I call it the sweet 16 code, because I figured out that it might be a 16-base code (see image below)

He also states that the sweet sixteen is not a girl, but a "new one". I think he is meaning a new moon, as the female energy is usually the moon.

This might have been one of the keys to his manipulation of gravity.

http://www.antigravitymovie.com/disk.jpg

http://www.antigravitymovie.com/book.jpg

Best
James

[Cartomancer]

Wow. That make a lot of sense in the context of what he was doing. There is definitely a lot more to Coral Castle than meets the eye. It does also seem that it has been intentionally ignored over the years. I wonder if this is because the technology he used or the true meaning of what he was up to? Great observations.

[Luis Filipe]

Hi people, I hope this helps we all to understand this puzzle.

People, this is very easy stuff, we just have to know where to look, here is a video that i find quite interresting, lets figure this thing out and start to build really massive stone structures!!!!!!!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdiW-FiO1mk&list=LLZOdu8NTLGBgbgPsY-Jh8RA