PDA

View Full Version : NSA - behind the Curtain, Synthetic Telepathy, other articles linked to from ATS



mountain_jim
30th January 2012, 19:48
I found the following thread at ATS very interesting.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread803182/pg1

there are a number of links there to articles from 'Deep_Thought' I have not read the whole thread, so if he or this info is successfully debunked, I don't know it yet. I suspect there is factual data here, and I am just scratching the surface of this content so far. I know AI is a key subject around here, as is the possible ability to create and channel content to unsuspecting channelers from AI or other sources.

NSA Mind Control Technology and A.I. Revealed

with this link, discussing the AI capabilities

http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2012/01/16/10169491-the-nsa-behind-the-curtain



The NSA – Behind The Curtain

As promised, today we will take an in-depth examination of the NSA's global intelligence gathering network. What you are about to read will come as an eye-opener and represents the current state of the NSA's capabilities. Some of this will be expected, some of it will come as a shock.


What you will learn is that the technology that underpins this global listening network is a lot more advanced than governments would have you know. Usually wrapped up in basic, generalised, descriptions the general public is kept blind to the current state of technological development.



We will take this examination in three major parts. The first part will examine the core processing system. Once this part is understood, we can then look at how information flows to and from this core and where it is obtained from. Finally, we will examine how this information is used by the NSA.



I will cover as much as possible about this system, but the scope is very large. In general, any use of this data that the reader can observe is most likely already being conducted.



Mr Computer



The scope of the NSA's infrastructure is mind boggling to say the least. Heavily compartmentalised, the entire array of systems is shielded from the average NSA employee as much as it is shielded from the public. That said, once you understand the core of the NSA, you will be in a position to see how information flows in and out of this core.



The NSA is built around a super-computer bound Artificial Intelligence known only as “Mr Computer” in the civilian world. This is not your average A.I., no basic set of responses or a mere dedicated algorithm that can spot patterns. Mr Computer is an entity or being in his own right. A sentient computer system as complex as any human.



Comparable to VMware in a way, an instance of Mr Computer can be started at a moments notice. Within seconds, a fully fledged virtual intelligence agent, ready to analyse the information that has been piped to him, can be up and running.



Mr Computer is competent enough to handle real-time interaction without human intervention. Mr Computer understands and speaks all modern languages and even a number of dead ones. Able to intelligently converse and express its own opinions, Mr Computer collates information from disparate sources and compiles them into concise reports that do not miss the smallest detail or nuance.



Mr Computer's capabilities and human-like reasoning cannot be understated.

.......



more of article at above link

and then I looked at this link

http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/21/4322682-synthetic-telepathy-the-hidden-truth



Synthetic Telepathy - The Hidden Truth

Michael Dwyer 21.05.2010 11:50

The following article is an entry that appeared on Wikipedia. Within the last 24 hours a major "edit war" broke out and it appeared, at least to me, that the information was being suppressed. The article goes into depth about a field of espionage that employs a technology known as "silent sound" or "Synthetic telepathy". If you're interested in high tech espionage, this makes for a very good read.

Synthetic telepathy

Synthetic telepathy also known as techlepathy or psychotronics) is a term used to describe the process in brain-computer interfaces by which human thought (as electromagnetic radiation) is intercepted, processed by computer and a return signal generated that is perceptible by the human brain. (ref 1,2,3,4)

==History==
In 1967, Edmond M. Dewan published a paper in Nature demonstrating the control of Alpha waves, turning them on and off, to produce Morse code. (ref 5) Using an EEG machine, Dewan and his fellow researchers were able to send words and phrases by thought alone.

In 1976, Robert G. Malech was awarded United States Patent 3951134 for remotely monitoring and altering brainwaves using radio.(ref 6) This patent makes reference to demodulating the waveform, displaying it to an operator for viewing and passing this to a computer for further analysis.

In 1988, Farwell, L.A. & Donchin, D. produced a paper describing a method of transmitting linguistic information using the P300 response system. (ref 7) This system combined matching observed information to what the subject was thinking of. In this case, being able to select a letter from the alphabet that the subject was thinking of. In theory, any input could be used and a lexicon constructed.

United States Patent 6,011,991, granted January 4, 2000, describes a method of monitoring an individual's brain waves remotely, for the purposes of communication. Filed December 7, 1998, the patent outlines a system that monitors an individual's brainwaves via a sensor, then transmits this, specifically by satellite, to a computer for analysis. This analysis would determine if the individual was attempting to communicate a "word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal".(ref 8)

==Theory==
Approaches to synthetic telepathy can be categorized into two major groups, passive and active. Like sonar, the receiver can take part or passively listen.

Passive reception is the ability to "read" a signal without first broadcasting a signal. This can be roughly equated to tuning into a radio station, the brain generates electromagnetic radiation which can be received at a distance. That distanced is determined by the sensitivity of the receiver, the filters used and the bandwidth required. Most universities would have limited budgets and receivers such as EEG (and similar devices) would be used. A related military technology is the surveillance system TEMPEST, the effective range of which is classified. (ref 9) Given that US Congress attempted to enact a bill in Oct 2001 banning these type of devices as "space weapons", (ref 10) may indicate that fluctuations in the human magnetic field can be intercepted by satellite.

Robert G. Malech's approach requires a modulated signal to be broadcast at the target. The method uses an active signal which is interfered with by the brain's modulation. Thus, the return signal can be used to infer the original brainwave. This approach does expose the transmitter, but is ultimately required for generating return signals that can be processed by the brain.

The research of Farwell, L.A. & Donchin, D, is the first public revelation that could lead to a generic lexicon being developed, however, this is implied in the work of Robert G. Malech in 1976.

==Current research==

.... (edited so as not to post entire article here - rest at link)


==Further reading==
Dr Nick Begich - Controlling the Human Mind, Earth Pulse Press Anchorage - isbn=1-890693-54-5}}
Walter Bowart - http://www.scribd.com/doc/24531011/Operation-Mind-Control
John Marks - In Search of the Manchurian Candidate, publisher WW Norton & Co, 1979, isbn=0-393-30794-8

==References==
1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27162401/ - Army developing 'synthetic telepathy'
2. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/HealthSci/US_army_developing_synthetic_telepathy/ articleshow/3596708.cms - US army developing synthetic telepathy
3.url=http://io9.com/5038464/army-sinks-millions-into-synthetic-telepathy-research - Army Sinks Millions Into "Synthetic Telepathy" Research
4. http://io9.com/5065304/tips-and-tricks-for-mind-control-from-the-us-military - Tips and Tricks for Mind Control from the US Military
5. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/research.html#Dewan - MURI: Synthetic Telepathy
6. http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=3951134&KC=&FT=E - Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves
7. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/research.html#FarwellDonchin - MURI: Synthetic Telepathy
8. http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=6011991&KC=&FT=E - Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity
9. http://www.sst.ws/tempstandards.php?pab=1_1 - TEMPEST measurement standards
10. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h107-2977 - Space Preservation Act of 2001
11. http://www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm - PSY-OPS WEAPONRY USED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR}}
12. Wall, Judy, "Military Use of Mind Control Weapons", NEXUS, 5/06, Oct-Nov 1998
13. Soldier-Telepathy" Drummond, Katie - Pentagon Preps Soldier Telepathy Push - http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/pentagon-preps-soldier-telepathy-push
14. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/research.html - MURI: Synthetic Telepathy
15. Soldier-Telepathy" Drummond, Katie - Pentagon Preps Soldier Telepathy Push - http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/pentagon-preps-soldier-telepathy-push
16. Soldier-Telepathy" Drummond, Katie - Pentagon Preps Soldier Telepathy Push - http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/pentagon-preps-soldier-telepathy-push
17. Noah, Shachtman - Pentagon's PCs Bend to Your Brain - http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/03/the_us_military
18. http://pinktentacle.com/2008/12/scientists-extract-images-directly-from-brain/ - Scientists extract images directly from brain
19. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/research.html#Overview - MURI: Synthetic Telepathy -Overview
20. http://cnslab.ss.uci.edu/muri/research.html#ImaginedSpeechProduction - MURI: Synthetic Telepathy
21. http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf -Bioeffects of selected non-lethal weapons
22. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a785359968 - Partial Amnesia for a Narrative Following Application of Theta Frequency Electromagnetic Fields
23. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.11/persinger.html - This Is Your Brain on God
24. http://www.charlesrehn.com/charlesrehn/books/aconversationwithamerica/essays/myessays/The%20NSA.doc - The NSA & Synthetic Telepathy
25. http://www.uwe.ac.uk/hlss/research/cpss/Journal_Psycho-Social_Studies/v2-2/SmithC.shtml - Journal of Psycho-Social Studies - Vol 2 (2) 2003 - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology by Dr. Carole Smith
26. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_nonlethalweapons02.htm - Eleanor White - New Devices That 'Talk' To The Human Mind Need Debate, Controls
27. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,159,703.PN.&OS=PN/5,159,703&RS=PN/5,159,703 - Silent subliminal presentation system
28. http://www.audioholics.com/education/loudspeaker-basics/understanding-loudspeaker-frequency-response | - Understanding Loudspeaker Frequency Response
29. http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=367925 - Q: Radio signals picked up by tooth fillings
30. http://cbcg.org/gjcs1.htm| - God’s Judgment Cometh Soon
31. http://www.patentgenius.com/patent/6587729.html - Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect
32. http://www.psychology.nottingham.ac.uk/staff/lpxdts/TMS%20info.html - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
33. http://www.scribd.com/doc/6508206/SYNTHETIC-TELEPATHY-AND-THE-EARLY-MIND-WARS - SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY AND THE EARLY MIND WARS
34. http://newdawnmagazine.com.au/Article/Brain_Zapping_Part_One.html - Brain Zapping
35. http://genamason.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/more-on-synthetic-telepathy/ - More on synthetic telepathy
36. http://newdawnmagazine.com.au/Article/Brain_Zapping_Part_One.html - Brain Zapping
37. http://daprocess.com/01.welcome.html - DaProcess of A Federal Investigation PG 1 of 4
38. ,http://www.uwe.ac.uk/hlss/research/cpss/Journal_Psycho-Social_Studies/v2-2/SmithC.shtml -Journal of Psycho-Social Studies - Vol 2 (2) 2003 - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology by Dr. Carole Smith
39. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h107-2977 - Space Preservation Act of 2001
40. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/60minutes/main4694713.shtml - 60 Minutes: Incredible Research Lets Scientists Get A Glimpse At Your Thoughts
41. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5119805n&tag=related;photovideo - 60 Minutes: Video - Mind Reading

ivaray
8th February 2012, 04:19
Is Mr. Computer actually alive? Who is essentially running the show? Humans or hive A.I.? If Mr. Computer analyzes all data, cross-references, and possibly fingerprints minds of the people, records electronic information, or even thoughts via electronic wireless outlets; is then the output (flags given to NSA officials) actually a genuine product of this hive A.I? In the past, early 90s there were applications of the genetic algorithm/engineering programs in various research and commercial aspects--from predicting the "behaviors" of the stocks on the stock market, coping basic biological behaviors of bio-species, to the computing of the air-traffic schedules, etc. At that time the major question asked was about the inependent ability of A.I. to offer solutions to the problems that humans could have not done so precise and fast. Today A.I. is biotechnology, where the computer actually could have (or simply has) the neural brain wired along with the computer memory and engineering. Modern neural brains used for computers have an ability to regenerate bio structures on the molecular level. Before few years ago Kevin Warwick’s (UK) experimentation with neural brains derived from the rats and wired on the computers with sensory abilities was successful, but the problem was how to keep freshness of the neural brains for a longer period of time. If it is stated that Mr. Computer is an entity with its own right (autonomous sentient being), is this thing actually alive?

ivaray
8th February 2012, 15:50
In this thread there are two articles--A.I. and synthetic telepathy, so I feel equally passonate about both of the topics. I cannot miss an opportunity to comment on some aspects of synthetic telepathy. Every single year there are larger and larger advances in technology for remote viewing by electronic wireless outlets and tools, which means that everybody should be concern about preserving human privacy and mind autonomy. Right now Japanese computer scientists can actually translate thoughts in images, black and white images, but they can translate your thoughts in pictures so to speak. UC Irvine scientists are focused on the whole interdisciplinary project about imaging thoughts through the reception and translation of the brain electromagnetic frequencies. Recently the proton transistor was invented and now new electronic devices can conduct earlier flawed communication between electromagnetic brain frequencies in a much better way. The final goal of all of these advances is that in the future we might just “download” knowledge and change traditional ways of communication with an instant “telepathic” imaging thoughts. This sounds great except, someone could download to another person a wrong memory. Nick Begich, researcher in the field of mind control issues, specifically questions this scenario in his November 28 2011, Prison Planet Interview about the mind control—what happens if the witness in the court is the victim of this type of technology--the witness has the “download” memory of the event and he/she is about to testify? Who is in charge?

mountain_jim
8th February 2012, 19:42
I just started watching (on DVDs) the show Fringe recently, and this article comes very close to the season 2 episode 5 I watched last night, though in Fringe an implant was used to go beyond basic synethetic telepathy to full-scale dreaming/hallucinations stimulation.

http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2010/10/09/5262967-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-physics-revealed-part-4

(see the link for diagrams and visuals)



Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed - Part 4

By Deep_Thought

Hardware hacking taken to a whole new level...

The brain emits weak radio waves that can be detected and matched against a database of neural network patterns to reveal what was being thought.

Amounting to a security flaw, a radio transmitter can "replay", or transmit, those same frequencies and patterns causing a person to experience sound, images, thoughts, feelings, tastes and smells.
advertisement
In the last article, we refined our figures for the detection of weak radio emissions, from a single neuron, at orbital distances. Whilst the signal was weak, less than -200dBW, it was nothing outrageous that a modern satellite array could not detect. In this article, I have decided to fill in some of the missing blanks when it comes to the actual mechanism that betrays our thoughts.

For those that have a deeper interest, or indeed are involved in Neuroscience, I have come across a scientific paper which should outline the principle in more scientific terms. The following paper, published in 1995, describes the electromagnetic induction of "fundamental algorithms", or neural networks, to generate any sensory perception required. We will get to how this functions in a moment, for now, have a quick read:

On the possibility of directly accessing every human brain by electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms.


Persinger MA.
Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a subharmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396?dopt=Citation

For our astute readers that have been following this series, this is identical to the implied mechanism cited by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) in 1977. A full 18 years prior to the release of the above paper. The description is as follows:

The writer discusses Kogan's calculation on information transmission. While he points out that the calculations should not be considered as proof of the validity of the magnetic nature of telepathic signals nor if the existence of telepathy, he suggests that, if telepathy exists and if it takes place by means of radio waves, then one should look in the range of wavelengths of 300-1000 km.

So, how does this actually work?

Hacking The Brain

To understand the issue a little clearer, we will need to treat the human brain much like a computer with dedicated hardware. In this respect, what we are looking for is one, or more, security flaws that we can exploit. So, we have to come at this much like a hacker would.

We know from our previous articles that the brain emits weak radio frequencies in the sub-1000Hz range. The principles of radio tell us anything that can produce a radio signal, can also accept one. Thus, we have overcome our first major hurdle, the establishment of a physical transport layer. A physical transport layer allows for two-way communications.

Given that we know that no information is directly encoded onto the radio waves, the frequencies are unique due to axon properties and the supply of energy will cause a neuron to fire, we have now established a data transport layer. That is, data is not communicated, it is stimulated in the target and the target experiences whatever that stimulation corresponds to.

If we return to our hacker analogy, what we have found is the human brain, whilst using a spread spectrum and a highly discreet frequency response to eliminate cross-talk, is unable to label information and determine that it has been processed before. In short, the human brain is vulnerable to what is known as a replay attack.

I have provided two diagrams, on the right hand side, to explain how this functions. If we look at diagram two, we can observe how the neurons, when viewing green grass, emits a specific pattern of radio waves at certain frequencies. If we now look at diagram three, we can observe that transmitting this pattern and frequencies back to the brain will result in the target seeing green grass. Of course, there are certain limitations and we will discuss them in a moment.

As we can see, anything we can possibly experience can be reduced to certain patterns and frequencies emitted from the human brain. As such, any experience can be faked by a computer and sent to your brain. Thus, it is a matter of recognizing these patterns and frequencies and this brings us back to the first citation in this article.

As human beings, we all assume that we are unique and that should be the case with our brains. As much as we would wish this to be true, it is simply not. We all must perform the same functions and be wired relatively similarly to conduct those functions. The reason we can all, for the most part, see, touch, smell, hear and taste indicates that we have all have the same basic circuitry that allows these perceptions to function. With pattern matching and a large database we can build a library of thoughts, feelings, images, opinions and sounds that are generally applicable to anyone.

Thus, as the above citation calls it, we all have certain fundamental algorithms. As such, we all emit very similar patterns and frequencies due to this similar wiring. The slight variations that do occur, prevent us from emitting radio waves that would cause interference in all of our perceptions. If this we're not the case, we would experience each others thoughts, vision, auditory and emotional experiences every minute of every day. Again, for our astute readers, this would indicate limited acts of natural telepathy due to wave propagation and frequency response. That, however, is a completely different story.

The limitation that I mentioned earlier are the result of actively processing input. That is, whilst I can put phosphenes or bright images in your vision, I may not be able to put more subtle or complex images. The problem is that the neurons are already firing and I have only two choices, interrupt or accelerate. That would usually translate to either darkness, or a bright spot. A similar issue exists with all sensory input. As a result, it is not possible to place someone into a VR type environment, but it is possible to scramble their inputs, causing wide spread malfunctions, hallucinations and loss of motor skills.

The Dark Side

That's pretty much it for the technical side of the mechanism, but the real question would be, what would it be like? Well, if I got you to think of the phrase "Hello World!" and recorded the associated frequencies and patterns, I could retransmit them and you would feel that you have just thought the words "Hello World!", in your own inner voice. Unless you had extensive experience with the A.I. and a very deep understanding of your own mind, then it would be impossible to tell the difference.

Now, imagine a merger talks, or even political agreement. To get a person to commit to an agreement, I simply transmit a copy of my own feelings of acceptance to the target. They now feel the way you do about the agreement and will sign. It is also possible to block certain thoughts, or feelings of negativity, and even place your own counter-arguments to these thoughts directly into their mind. As far as the target is concerned, it was their own idea and they did it out of their own free will.

Why debate when you can impose your will?

onawah
8th February 2012, 20:50
Thanks so much for this thread.
This is the kind of information I've been wanting more of on the thread at:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?39225-Recognizing-and-Recovering-from-Psyop-Hoaxed-Channeled-Messages&p=416523#post416523
Even if the info here is not directly involved with hoaxed channeled info, it is still indicative of the lengths the black ops programs will go to to misinform and mind control the public.
Is anyone aware of any of this research being focused on mind control as directly regarding channeled information?
Specifically, has any whistleblower come forth with information showing that channelers are being given information from these psyop programs and made to think they are actually getting the info from EDs?
Thanks again.

mountain_jim
8th February 2012, 21:18
Thanks so much for this thread.
This is the kind of information I've been wanting more of on the thread at:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?39225-Recognizing-and-Recovering-from-Psyop-Hoaxed-Channeled-Messages&p=416523#post416523
Even if the info here is not directly involved with hoaxed channeled info, it is still indicative of the lengths the black ops programs will go to to misinform and mind control the public.


Yes onawah I did post some of these links and info to that thread (on page 2)

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?39225-Recognizing-and-Recovering-from-Psyop-Hoaxed-Channeled-Messages&p=415357&viewfull=1#post415357

but I don't know of any specific whistleblower info relating this to channelings... (yet)

mountain_jim
8th February 2012, 21:30
some notes of interest

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vision_remota/esp_visionremota_11.htm



Mayhap, US researchers into remote viewers’ capabilities have learnt to manipulate EM field effects for their RV experiments using electronic enhancement of Psi effects. This methodology being the basis for US experiments into biological synthetic telepathy; the use of EM fields to boost latent Psi gene activity to the level where it is useful. My research seems to indicate that they are only scratching the surface of the RV envelope.



What is interesting to note from Dr. Ross Adey’s research, is that a 6-20 Hz frequency is needed for the neuronal calcium efflux events. Normal people are entrained to function at high beta, which pushes there EEG measured brainwave frequency above the 20 Hz threshold. This means that normal people have no contact with neuronal calcium efflux events. If these events are, as I believe, an integral part of RV and other Psi operations, the general public will be Psi damped, not exhibiting parapsychological talents to any marked degree. Alpha training, that teaches people to work in the 7-14 Hz range, seems to open up Psi abilities. If neuronal calcium efflux events are crucial to Psi operation, we can begin to see a reason why simple techniques of alpha entrainment and biofeedback, bring on paranormal functioning in humans.



Major Ed Dames has stated that military remote viewers operate in theta. This is a brainwave frequency of 4-7 Hz. It may be that lower frequencies in the 6-20 Hz window, are more powerful for Psi activity. Since the energy of the EM wave is related to frequency, if we lower the frequency of the brainwaves, we can think with less energy, and biophysical RV vehicle are therefore more efficient.





While telepathy and ESP, like UFOs, do not exist to the western scientific community, insiders in the US secret government have long known these phenomena are for real. While in Russia, the military uses of telepathy and ESP have been well researched.

1 . Deployment of these telepathic weapon systems has been carried out since the sixties. Failure by the US government to duplicate the Russians in the biophysical field, led them to develop synthetic telepathy. This was the electronic scanning of victims brains by monitoring the electromagnetic (EM) emissions from peoples’ brains and using among other things, the P300 brain waves (as measured on an EEG), to read the victim’s subvocalised thoughts.

2 . Sony has for five years ploughed millions of yen into researching ESP and telepathy.

3 . If these phenomena do not exist, why are the big players spending fortunes on research and why is all the meaningful research classified? The answer to that being that the NWO wishes to use this ESP research for military purposes and for civilian control.

Quantum Logic
8th February 2012, 21:48
Did you know that both purely positive and negative thought patterns can be generated at a molecular level in our brains by a technological means discovered by Diroc? The key is electron manipulation. Do not take my word for it- look it up and learn to understand. This is the key to our past, present, and future.

QL

onawah
9th February 2012, 00:42
Even if we can't find proof that psyops are being used on channelers by humans, the fact that this kind of technology exists on our planet (probably reverse-engineered) would tend to indicate that negative ETs have it and could be using it for their own agendas.
While I personally believe that there are benevolent ETs and EDs assisting us, we don't know if they are able to monitor all frequencies and deter such operations.

Quantum Logic
9th February 2012, 01:51
Even if we can't find proof that psyops are being used on channelers by humans, the fact that this kind of technology exists on our planet (probably reverse-engineered) would tend to indicate that negative ETs have it and could be using it for their own agendas.
While I personally believe that there are benevolent ET. and EDs assisting us, we don't know if they are able to monitor all frequencies and deter such operations.

Use what you know and be objective- if electron manipulation tech exists, which it does, why wouldn't they be able to monitor all frequencies. Remember- sound, light, x-ray, etc. are all waveforms. Now apply this knowledge to a holographic universe model. What do you think they can REALLY do?

QL

aranuk
9th February 2012, 02:48
So what exactly are we talking about here? Is there a technology for reading peoples minds through sattelites? In laymans terms can you explain or give a short summary Mountain Jim?
I have read these quotes. But I'm not sure what is going on now or whether they are talking about what will be possible soon.

Stan

onawah
9th February 2012, 03:32
Well, I imagine that they could, but as to whether they would or perhaps, would have time to, might be another thing.
I imagine they've got their hands full as it is, with matters even more pressing.



Even if we can't find proof that psyops are being used on channelers by humans, the fact that this kind of technology exists on our planet (probably reverse-engineered) would tend to indicate that negative ETs have it and could be using it for their own agendas.
While I personally believe that there are benevolent ET. and EDs assisting us, we don't know if they are able to monitor all frequencies and deter such operations.

Use what you know and be objective- if electron manipulation tech exists, which it does, why wouldn't they be able to monitor all frequencies. Remember- sound, light, x-ray, etc. are all waveforms. Now apply this knowledge to a holographic universe model. What do you think they can REALLY do?

QL

ivaray
9th February 2012, 04:35
Amazing text, good points broght to the discussion. Thanks for offering this source. I saw recently this text bud really didn’t have time to read it all. It is worth spending some time and reading the article. Here are some of my conclusions: remote viewing would not be possible without modulated EM frequencies in miliseconds, and you couldn’t really decode well someone’s brain frequency waves without isolating other noise or other ELF, so for this you need very focused beams along with quick modulation. Am I wrong or this HAARP? HAARP project focuses on all electronic and other means of communication through EM waves and their systems could be used for all kinds of communication control including synthetic telepathy.

ivaray
9th February 2012, 05:04
Addition: Deep Thought answered to my question about Mr. Computer being a part of biotechnology and the supercomputer is definitely not biotechnology, but simulation of a neural intelligence/brain. This is good, no cyborg supercomputer yet among the Intelligence Community. It is true that level of the output of this hive intelligence is similar to a complex mind activity. Mr. Computer is somewhat alive....

jcocks
9th February 2012, 11:34
I remember there was a company here in Perth years ago, which had claimed to have invented a computer that mimics the processes of the human brain.... I can't remember what they were called, but everything went quiet rather quickly. They were featured on the program "towards 2000" which used to be shown here many years ago....

mountain_jim
9th February 2012, 15:14
So what exactly are we talking about here? Is there a technology for reading peoples minds through sattelites? In laymans terms can you explain or give a short summary Mountain Jim?
I have read these quotes. But I'm not sure what is going on now or whether they are talking about what will be possible soon.

Stan

All I can say for certain is to suggest you read the links at the ATS link for following articles, where Deep Thought makes the science case that it is possible, then 'eye-witness testimony' link, the 2 links cover 'target's stories' to describe the process as he envisions it, and decide for yourself what this means. I have read or in some cases scanned the material and have it placed in the 'likely possible but not proved to me' status. And if it's possible from what we know about MK-ULTRA and other secret projects there is no doubt in my mind that some will use it if they can get it working, ethics are not in the equation for many of these folks, based on what has come out about other secret mind-control projects :



Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed

deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed - Part 2
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed - Part 3
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed - Part 4
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Physics Revealed - Part 5
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Eye-Witness Testimony
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Hunting For The Signal
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - The Target's Story
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - The Target's Story - Part 2
deepthought.newsvine.com...

Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Time To Come Clean
deepthought.newsvine.com...

NSA Disinformation - Watch The Watchers With Me
deepthought.newsvine.com...

NSA Disinformation - Watch The Watchers With Me (Part 2)
deepthought.newsvine.com...

The NSA – Behind The Curtain
deepthought.newsvine.com...



From
http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2011/03/30/6371299-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-the-targets-story



Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - The Target's Story

With so many articles on this topic, I thought it was about time that a high level overview was produced. So, in this article we are going to focus on what this system can do and present it in plain English. We have already discussed the mechanisms at length, the reception of radio telemetry from the brain and the retransmission of that telemetry to induce neural networks into firing. Now we are going to show you the entire process, from the perspective of a target. Depending on the ultimate purpose, this scenario may be quite different in terms of how it plays out. Also, given that a lot of it is dynamic, that is, related to current activity the exact sequence of events will vary.

I will split this article into multiple articles due to its length.

< text left out ..... >

End Of Part 1

If you sit back and look at this objectively, you can basically see the goals emerge, both short term and long term:

1. Proven feasibility of remote activation of an oblivious assassin.

2. Established long term cover for continued experimentation.

3. Proven to fool trained medical professionals

4. Established a control mechanism over the target.

5. Secured long term capability to conduct experiments, both in terms of social isolation and inability to work.

6. Established a method of inducing an electronic form of a "stroke", without killing the target outright.

7. Established barriers to identification by compromising the psyche of the target.

I am sure this is a lot to take in at the moment, as the above description is very detailed and disturbing. It really brings to life the work I have been publishing for over a year now. I am sure everyone is wondering if this is a true story, the answer is yes, it is from an eye-witness testimony.

The next article will cover what happens over the next decade. Yes, you read that correctly, this is a continuous experiment run over decades, until the target either commits suicide or their heart gives out.

It gets a lot worse.


His 'eye-witness testimony article'

http://deepthought.newsvine.com/_news/2011/03/06/6200774-can-a-satellite-read-your-thoughts-eye-witness-testimony



Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? - Eye-Witness Testimony

If you have been following this series for the last year or so, you would know that I demonstrated how naturally occurring radio signals can be reconstructed by computer to betray thoughts, feelings, sight and sound and how such information can be communicated back to the body. Today we are going to take a look at some of the eye-witness testimony and see how it stacks up against the technical material.

.....

The eye-witness testimony is matching with the technical capabilities described within these series of articles. Obviously, this is no accident and very widespread.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

mountain_jim
9th February 2012, 15:41
another post of mine linking to an ATS thread and video concerning a scientist with a reputation as a skeptic who has 'proved' telepathy and discusses the magnetic field properties to encourage it.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40322-Question-for-Remote-Viewers-and-fellow-Telepaths&p=424292&viewfull=1#post424292

ivaray
11th February 2012, 21:16
We are getting very good in knowing what the new Intelligence and A.I. can do, but, unfortunately it would be difficult to prove the sinister application of these advanced technologies to common people. Isn't it that the technology is set this way, so there is no clear cut where by which you can prove aspects of its application? “Everybody knows” is ok reasoning, but in the court-room or in the physician’s office this doesn’t fly. In the suggested article the example about a person who communicated an assault on his mind autonomy, showed the person who was familiar with the frame of references regarding possible mind manipulation i.e. a person in the "sacred circle." What could do a person who would not have knowledge about these technologies?

ivaray
11th February 2012, 21:25
I am really trying to digest everything I can about this topic, probably too fast, but while we’ve been discussing various aspects of remote control surveillance, the more ingenious idea is introduced soon to become the legalized tool for Intelligence and Police information gathering, the drones! Obviously, some special police operations have already used drones. I guess, “we the people” cannot even keep up with this fast highway line driven by the scientific and political oligarchy. Does it ever stop? I wish I have never learned how to sum two and two—what does it tell you when you have already in place, 18.67 The National Defense Act, and the political establishment working to approve the legal use of drones on the US territory and their citizens? From this point, remote viewing seems like a lemonade beverage.

Finally, I would like to share with you the information I found on the Internet and is related to the Google gathering information that is interestingly coupled with HAARP and implies aspects of remote viewing too. Sorry if you are already familiar with this news. Here is the summary: “Rense and Moret: Google Sinister DNA Plans;” talks about Google developing one global operating system where by which the Google system maps all computers in the world and connect them with persons by confirming connections via facebook, yahoo, gmail, Microsoft, and social sites (inventors: Larry Page, Sergey Brin). The scientist who reported this story stated that the Los Alamos National Lab i.e. the nuclear science lab, is also connected with the Human Genome Project, the scientist involved in this project “track people by EMFs emitted by individual DNA!” Every living being works as an antenna for this gathering information system and according to this report the final goal is to do the DNA survey from the space, offer the inventory of all living beings DNAs and who knows (?!), possibly to control or modify some aspects of DNA in living beings. Here are some links, the video and the book:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNlFNhdiO_c&feature=related
http://books.google.com/books/about/A_human_tracking_mobile_robot_system_bas.html?id=oPRzQSkyRV0C

Sidney
11th February 2012, 22:06
I wonder if the fact that we have all been breathing aluminum for the last 15 or so years has helped turn us into walking antennae.??

ivaray
12th February 2012, 00:24
Made me laugh.... If someone would talk to me last year and told me that we were sprayed with aluminum and barium or "walking antenna" I would offer to a person a calming tea and suggest to seek help in a week or so. I wish I wake up tomorrow and there is no HAARP or any of these additional knowledge about advanced technologies, but once you begin digging into the topic you cannot go back. Hey, I hope I didn't misrepresent a part of the report about antenna wording. I guess what they mean they can really "fingerprint" one's brain on the bases of one's unique EM frequencies, but besides this part the lab has some additional connection with the Human Genome project (screening species, living beings). See the video.

Sidney
12th February 2012, 02:36
No, I know what you mean, and makes perfect sense, but I do remember(quite some time ago) reading once that a person was speculating that one of the purposes of the chemtrailing was to turn us into walking antennae for easy tracking of individual persons. But you are right, once you go down the rabbit hole, you rarely come up for air.