"IRAN IS NOT MAKING NUKES"...Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff

[doodah]

For those of you who are sick and tired of seeing all the Warmongering Headlines posted here and elsewhere, I'm posting this - a voice of reason.

I won't be able to monitor this thread or post replies, but I hope others will keep this in the forefront of their minds while all the crazies who WANT war keep on taking up airspace. Statements of this kind seem to get lost in the yelling, but I surely hope this guy is a white hat who will help stop the madness.

US Gen. Dempsey: Iran rational actor, not after nukes
20 Feb 2012
A top US military official has described Iran as a rational actor in the international arena, stating that the Islamic Republic is not after producing nuclear weapons. Speaking in a nationally televised interview with the CNN's "Fareed Zakaria GPS" show on Sunday, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey said, "We are of the opinion that Iran is a rational actor." Dempsey pointed out that US officials aren't convinced Iran has decided to build atomic armaments. "We also know, or we believe we know that Iran has not decided to make a nuclear weapon," General Dempsey said.

Peace, people. Stay on Timeline One at all times!

[doodah]

For those who don't know, here's Wiki's definition of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) is by law the highest ranking military officer in the United States Armed Forces, and is the principal military adviser to the President of the United States, the National Security Council, the Homeland Security Council and the Secretary of Defense. While the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff outranks all other officers, he does not have operational command authority over the Armed Forces; however, the Chairman does assist the President and the Secretary of Defense in exercising their command functions.

The Chairman convenes the meetings and coordinates the efforts of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), an advisory body comprising the Chairman, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the chiefs of staff of the United States Army and United States Air Force, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps. The Joint Staff is under the exclusive direction of the Chairman.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

My point in posting this little news article is that this is a HIGHLY INFORMED OPINION by this highly informed man who should know what he's talking about, and nobody seems to be paying any attention to it, not even here on Avalon.

[tonyp]

Hey there...why shoudn t Iran possess Nukes....as an independent Country why not...Ohh I get it they got oil wwe aint....lets nuke em b4 they can do the same to us...how democratic and satanic we are usa and gb...we are lovely people are we not...no war crimes have we ...cos everyone in GB AND THE USA... are so lovely...once a long time ago....god bless my friends of long ago from the cymru xx

[spiritguide]

If a national emergency in the U.S.A. is ever declared he should surround the capital building and the white house and hold them there for further processing on conspiricy to defraud and theft of tax revenues. Treason charges could come later when proven. This group needs to clean their respective houses also and they have the power to do it! IMHO

:peace:

[TelosianEmbrace]

Below is the Biography for General Martin E. Dempsey on the JCS website. I have attempted to link to a military site before and was unsuccessful, let's see if this works.

www.jcs.mil/biography.aspx?ID=135

It looks like Martin could well be a high level white hat, or ally of the ET's.

[BMJ]

Thanks Doodah,
That's great news, reading between the lines that may mean the US miltary may be saying they do not intend to proceed with attack on Iran, considering the basis for a possible attack was Iran having WMD. I wonder also if John K & friends had any influence on this statement and a possbile stand down.

[DeDukshyn]

Trust me ... nukes is NOT the issue (never has been) even if they are building them. Think .. Making us believe what they want us to believe. "Nukes" is a cover term that provides the emotional response they want. North Korea can build nukes without much fuss ... why not Iraq / Iran? Oh wait .. Iraq wasn't building nukes .. another lie ...


I heard this story once:
It implied that the false flag of Iraq (and their lack of "nukes") was merely part of a larger plan created so that the masses would stop a "real" threat that government said needed addressing (like Iraq), citing that the government was wrong about Iraq. The elite would the actually be helping a "rogue nation" plan an attack with nukes or a dirty bomb or whatever, so they could go back and address the masses - "look at what you've done! your compassion for these nations and believing their lies has caused your country great harm and thus we need to take away your voice to protect you from further harm." Wham! Bam! thank you NWO!

To me it looks like Iran just isn't playing the game the "elite" want them to play ... lol. They will still try to blame a "dirty bomb" or "nuke" incident on Iran ... wait for it .. it IS coming.

Damn ... now I'm expecting a visit from the CIA ...

[WhiteFeather]

The USA wouldn't dare whacking the proverbial beehive. There whole military fleet would be sent off planet or beamed into another star system.