PDA

View Full Version : John kettler - latest intel two



childs hood end
26th February 2012, 20:32
From Camelot.........................

JOHN KETTLER - LATEST INTEL TWO

NOW AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE - CLICK HERE TO VIEW (AUDIO ONLY VIDEO NOW REMOVED)

The audio on this is now understandable. We had tremendous problems getting this done partly due to my location at a hotel room where my livestream Procaster suddenly wouldn't work but also at John's end with weird interference of all kinds. I also was very sick during and after this interview!
Please note: this information is provided for further analysis and investigation. There is at present no real way to prove any of it. If proof becomes available we will post it as I am sure John Kettler will. However, IF the ETs he is working with are interfering as described there are many ramifications to this that need to be addressed. Whereas their help may be welcomed and even encouraged it is necessary to ask what their real agenda is and who they really are. It is very easy to deceive humanity from their vantage point and it is also easy to deceive well meaning individuals acting from the heart. This is something the dark side has taken full advantage of ...in parading as the light. Therefore I urge caution and careful discernment in analyzing and listening to all the material out there right now.

@ Kerry.... why dont you just ask John Kettler to have his E.T contacts` contact your goodself for confirmation of what he is saying ?

Cognitive Dissident
26th February 2012, 23:52
I have only listened to the first part of this so far, but I have to say, the whole story about the Venezuelan missiles makes little sense to me. Is he really saying that Chavez was threatening to bomb Mexico in order to attack the drug delivery route of a non-state actor (drug smugglers)? How did he think the Mexican government would react to that?! And anyway, a ballistic missile is hardly the best way to attack a supply route, unless maybe he was talking about bombing a warehouse or something. But even so, it just seems to be implausible for Chavez to think about doing this. Especially as these missiles were supposed to actually being fueled i.e. ready for use. I think that Kerry realised this too.
Apart from that, I find his information interesting. I doubt there is a straight fight going on between the NWO and anyone else, more likely the behind the scenes struggle that has been the case for a long time. But something tells me, he is not just making it all up. Key question, who is providing him with this information, and why? Who exactly are these ET/EDs? Not an easy question I know.

WhiteFeather
27th February 2012, 00:11
The first interview was awesome. Kettler and Kerry did a great job. Some amazing insights and knowledge Kettler has on the military, perhaps that's why he was selected as an informant for the ET/ED's. Didn't listen to the 2nd one yet. To many audio issues.

highlyter
29th February 2012, 03:27
I was able to watch the video on Saturday early a.m. and paused 35 mins into it. Came back and the video was no where to be found. Removed for technical issues or other? It was interesting. John seems quite passionate and willing to divulge what he believes.. I hope he believes truths. If anyone has the link to post, please share. Thanks. I'll check on Youtube now.

DreamsInDigital
29th February 2012, 03:30
Kerry took the Video down, but the Audio of it is still available online. :) He does believe truths, the reality variety with out the coddling kind. Sometimes I think it's just a little hard for some to swallow the complications of a more many shades of grey reality than distinct black and white kind that they've been raised on.

Cjay
29th February 2012, 03:56
I was very disappointed with the second interview because it was mostly a repeat of the information in the first interview.

Kerry seemed bored, tired, distracted. And no offense intended but the extreme closeups of Kerry on the webcam were not flattering. No wonder they chose to remove the video before posting it on YouTube.

Kerry's voice seems to be at least double the volume of John Kettler's voice, which makes it very painful to listen to. I am far more interested in hearing John Kettler's answers than Kerry's questions. Some simple audio compression could fix this problem in post-production. Better still - as this was streamed live - turn down the input gain on Kerry's microphone or move Kerry further away from her microphone. (Just my 2 cents worth, as a former audio engineer).

I think Kerry would do well to get much better organised if there is going to be a third interview. For example, I suggest having a list of questions written down (or on-screen), like a professional interviewer and try to work through the list methodically.

I also suggest getting rid of the public chat because that is very distracting and it detracts from the interview while adding nothing. The chat was full of disinfo people/flamers/trolls and there seemed to be no moderation on the chat. The chat was also full of childish/egocentric people seemingly jumping up and down as if to say "look at me, listen to me" or pasting the same questions or negative comments over and over and over. Ugh!

humanalien
29th February 2012, 04:16
I was very disappointed with the second interview because it was mostly a repeat of the information in the first interview.

Kerry seemed bored, tired, distracted. And no offense intended but the extreme closeups of Kerry on the webcam were not flattering. No wonder they chose to remove the video before posting it on YouTube.

Kerry's voice seems to be at least double the volume of John Kettler's voice, which makes it very painful to listen to. I am far more interested in hearing John Kettler's answers than Kerry's questions. Some simple audio compression could fix this problem in post-production. Better still - as this was streamed live - turn down the input gain on Kerry's microphone or move Kerry further away from her microphone. (Just my 2 cents worth, as a former audio engineer).

I think Kerry would do well to get much better organised if there is going to be a third interview. For example, I suggest having a list of questions written down (or on-screen), like a professional interviewer and try to work through the list methodically.

I also suggest getting rid of the public chat because that is very distracting and it detracts from the interview while adding nothing. The chat was full of disinfo people/flamers/trolls and there seemed to be no moderation on the chat. The chat was also full of childish/egocentric people seemingly jumping up and down as if to say "look at me, listen to me" or pasting the same questions or negative comments over and over and over. Ugh!

Now that is one damn fine idea. Get rid of the chat totally. The interview isn't
about kerrys followers after-all. If kerry wants to do a Q and A at the end, she
can have some already listed on her pc. She can get the questions from her
forum members and avalons.

DreamsInDigital
29th February 2012, 06:32
The first hour of the second interview was spent going around and around and around over the same topic of the Venezuelan Missile Crisis, which had already been covered extensively in the first interview and yet apparently only served to confuse people more on some very important parts. She should have asked him about the new updates to his blog, the new things happening and talked about his book as was the intent. Or, even better yet "re-scheduled" the whole thing. She was obviously sick, and aside from that is apparently going through some professional and personal issues I think could be sorted with a small "break". And, then after working out what ever, and maybe getting more fluent with operating live stream to avoid the "every time" technical difficulties. To have come back and did the 2nd interview, THEN it would have come off a much better interview for everyone involved. And, I'm all for the whole "dump the side chat" thing.

But, there are being scheduled currently interviews with a handful of other radio shows. So we'll get the opportunity to experience an different interviewer with Mr. Kettler and get the chance to see what comes out and what happens with someone else taking their own swing at the ball.

eileenrose
1st March 2012, 06:29
I assume (I gave up listening to the 2nd interview), that Kettler doesn't have proof that aliens exist? He mentions all the contributions they made in this missile episode (which I feel is a real event caused somehow by Iran).

...I keep wondering about this....as you would think that if aliens were helping us out this much we would all start to see proof they existed.

I am just left wondering if people are getting information from aliens or from somewhere else.

I guess I will keep on eye on this fellow (see if he tries to make a living on 'what the alien's say', which unfortunately, does more to disprove their existence than prove it......because if they (ET) do exist, they cover up their tracks and leave people looking stupid or worse).

DreamsInDigital
1st March 2012, 19:35
..I keep wondering about this....as you would think that if aliens were helping us out this much we would all start to see proof they existed.
If it wasn't for the strangle hold the government has on the media, censorship of the highest level. I don't really think this would be a problem.

I am just left wondering if people are getting information from aliens or from somewhere else.
It depends on the individual. I know he's getting his information from real ET/ED's, half the ones he talks to regularly are ones I've known personally for a couple decades now. And, the other half..are allies of mine, and so is the scientific race.

proof that aliens exist?
There is more proof out there that aliens exist than would choke every last elephant on this planet. We've had soft disclosure via release of hundreds of thousands of documents from governments the world over, including the FBI and NSA here in the United States, plus decades of Video and Photographic Evidence. I'm sorry, but anyone at this point that isn't aware of or doesn't believe ET's/Aliens exist is either blind, in denial or hasn't looked hard and far enough. They Exist, They're Real. There is no debate there.