king anthony
2nd March 2012, 05:05
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Ds1LnpUxY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Ds1LnpUxY
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUR6xYcYTs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUR6xYcYTs
Of what value is it, that those who are "crazy" or under the influence of those "crazy", such as the population under the direction of "the few" sociopaths in control, point at some people and say, "you're crazy".
Social conditioning imposes the social norm and most of the populations does not even realize this; or if they do, as an individual, they surely stay within the status quo. It appears that once the population is guided in a direction, the herd is unstoppable, even when the direction may be to their own demise.
Anyone who knows something more, which is not accepted as common knowledge, go against the feel-good of sub-groups within the population, go against the established institutions of civilization and such are called "crazy".
Words commonly used to replace the word crazy is "conspiracy theorist" or "terrorist" - I say, is a conspiracy theorist one who exposes conspiracies or one who conspires and is a terrorist one who defends themselves or the one imposing?
Most of the populations do not want to give up what they believe they have, thus defend how the world is and pressure those who do not conform. Individuals are quick to accuse another of having mental issues, projecting their own real personal issues or limits on another. Blinded by their own lies, people seek and find support from those of like mind.
Amazingly, most of the population will believe outrageous stories, before accepting the simple truth. In part, it is for this reason those people who share their knowledge find themselves adding to the "boring truths"; another reason would be to satisfy the perpetual hunger of the population of the "new improved".
Calling one "crazy" or even a "terrorist" attacks the credibility of those who "don't fit in", it dehumanizes them into something of an object, allowing further attacks and possible destruction of healthy life. "The few" do this (and so do individuals of the human family) to those who are simply "advantaged" and attempt to share.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Ds1LnpUxY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Ds1LnpUxY
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUR6xYcYTs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUR6xYcYTs
Of what value is it, that those who are "crazy" or under the influence of those "crazy", such as the population under the direction of "the few" sociopaths in control, point at some people and say, "you're crazy".
Social conditioning imposes the social norm and most of the populations does not even realize this; or if they do, as an individual, they surely stay within the status quo. It appears that once the population is guided in a direction, the herd is unstoppable, even when the direction may be to their own demise.
Anyone who knows something more, which is not accepted as common knowledge, go against the feel-good of sub-groups within the population, go against the established institutions of civilization and such are called "crazy".
Words commonly used to replace the word crazy is "conspiracy theorist" or "terrorist" - I say, is a conspiracy theorist one who exposes conspiracies or one who conspires and is a terrorist one who defends themselves or the one imposing?
Most of the populations do not want to give up what they believe they have, thus defend how the world is and pressure those who do not conform. Individuals are quick to accuse another of having mental issues, projecting their own real personal issues or limits on another. Blinded by their own lies, people seek and find support from those of like mind.
Amazingly, most of the population will believe outrageous stories, before accepting the simple truth. In part, it is for this reason those people who share their knowledge find themselves adding to the "boring truths"; another reason would be to satisfy the perpetual hunger of the population of the "new improved".
Calling one "crazy" or even a "terrorist" attacks the credibility of those who "don't fit in", it dehumanizes them into something of an object, allowing further attacks and possible destruction of healthy life. "The few" do this (and so do individuals of the human family) to those who are simply "advantaged" and attempt to share.