"Channeling" is the reception and filtering of information

[Delight]

People seek "guidance" for a reason. The expectation is that there is some source of wisdom "out there" for us to use. But I say, we are responsible always for what we receive and that reception IS CHANNELING. As "creators of reality", we manage the results of reception of information. We take something of a signal but we make it "real". OUR filter shapes the way Reality looks. We essentially "channel" our lives.

The usefulness of the "channeling" is about the quality of reception, not the broadcast. The most powerful tool we own and sometimes ignore is our signature "filter" carved by intention. This filter is what determines the quality of what we then "see".

My original bias is that we live in a Universe that says "yes" to us for any experience we choose. This is a "no fault" "free will" zone to play within. It can be anything from our heaven to our hell. We always have the potential to choose "AGAIN" and differently.Sometimes we refine choice by coming up with "contrast" and then absolutely know what we do not prefer.

Another bias is that we do NOT ever engage just anyone at anytime, anywhere, anyway. We engage people, places, events and "information" frequencies that relate to our frequency. To me this is the "power" of the human being. We have a personal signature that can be altered at any moment but the signature always attracts what we experience. We can change our filter with change of intention.

The filter is a frequency channel that we might adopt versus "intend". There is a tendency in the human to take on frequencies to make them our own. You could say this is the downside to "empathy". There is a tendency to continue familiar frequencies, whatever the source. The familiarity is established early in life. It may even be established before we incarnate? That is not anything I know about except from "books" as I personally only "know" what I am experiencing now.

We gravitate to what we ARE already holding of interest.

It is "said" that one of the laws that the PTB operate under is "hide in plain sight". That means that all information must be placed out in the open. Is this true? I am not certain but it makes sense. If information is just all out there, we have to use our own filter to discern its relevance to us. Discernment is to me the increasing tuning to what is valuable for our purpose.

I have known the power of setting my intention. In my setting of conscious intention, I then focus my inputs to what I choose. In a most amazing way, I then see the manifestation in form of my intentional focus.

This is in my opinion the opportune time to do work on our filters.

To be unconscious of the inherent ability and responsibility to claim management of the filtering becomes a great disadvantage in my opinion. Those who have no knowledge of the process seem "blasted" by everything that has the loudest tone, hapless victims of an outside source. Those who seem most susceptible to confusion are those with the least consciousness about their own intentions.

So, in the last analysis, I think we create our personal reality out of where we place or fail to place awareness of our own power of the filter of intention.

And there are many channels and many frequencies all present here and now to choose. Discerrnment of what is valuable is to be conscious channelers for ourselves. And this is my final point.

Information we receive is MOST importantly for us. If we have received it, that is so we may use it. Use it most often to know what we "were" putting our focus on. Use it to choose "now". Here is a story.

The street preacher

On the corner, the preacher was given a message from God.
"The truck is coming. Get out of the way NOW".
So as he always did, he passed the message on to the crowd.
Just as he spoke the last word of the message, the truck hit him

[crested-duck]

I agree with your view and perception on this topic. It makes me feel good when I see someone doing "critical thinking" and comeing to the same conclusions as I, and being able to put into the best words most would understand and be able to make the same realization/conclusion themselves. I have no problem with people wanting to channel, but it should be a personal thing kept to oneself, not made public to add confusion to the alreaddy confuseing reality we're all trying to figure out our own place and survive in it. Some things in life are better off thought about in ones head rather than thinking out loud and confuseing and irritateing others.

[Fredenit]

People seek "guidance" for a reason. The expectation is that there is some source of wisdom "out there" for us to use. But I say, we are responsible always for what we receive and that reception IS CHANNELING. As "creators of reality", we manage the results of reception of information. We take something of a signal but we make it "real". OUR filter shapes the way Reality looks. We essentially "channel" our lives.

The usefulness of the "channeling" is about the quality of reception, not the broadcast. The most powerful tool we own and sometimes ignore is our signature "filter" carved by intention. This filter is what determines the quality of what we then "see".

My original bias is that we live in a Universe that says "yes" to us for any experience we choose. This is a "no fault" "free will" zone to play within. It can be anything from our heaven to our hell. We always have the potential to choose "AGAIN" and differently.Sometimes we refine choice by coming up with "contrast" and then absolutely know what we do not prefer.

Another bias is that we do NOT ever engage just anyone at anytime, anywhere, anyway. We engage people, places, events and "information" frequencies that relate to our frequency. To me this is the "power" of the human being. We have a personal signature that can be altered at any moment but the signature always attracts what we experience. We can change our filter with change of intention.

The filter is a frequency channel that we might adopt versus "intend". There is a tendency in the human to take on frequencies to make them our own. You could say this is the downside to "empathy". There is a tendency to continue familiar frequencies, whatever the source. The familiarity is established early in life. It may even be established before we incarnate? That is not anything I know about except from "books" as I personally only "know" what I am experiencing now.

We gravitate to what we ARE already holding of interest.

It is "said" that one of the laws that the PTB operate under is "hide in plain sight". That means that all information must be placed out in the open. Is this true? I am not certain but it makes sense. If information is just all out there, we have to use our own filter to discern its relevance to us. Discernment is to me the increasing tuning to what is valuable for our purpose.

I have known the power of setting my intention. In my setting of conscious intention, I then focus my inputs to what I choose. In a most amazing way, I then see the manifestation in form of my intentional focus.

This is in my opinion the opportune time to do work on our filters.

To be unconscious of the inherent ability and responsibility to claim management of the filtering becomes a great disadvantage in my opinion. Those who have no knowledge of the process seem "blasted" by everything that has the loudest tone, hapless victims of an outside source. Those who seem most susceptible to confusion are those with the least consciousness about their own intentions.

So, in the last analysis, I think we create our personal reality out of where we place or fail to place awareness of our own power of the filter of intention.

And there are many channels and many frequencies all present here and now to choose. Discerrnment of what is valuable is to be conscious channelers for ourselves. And this is my final point.

Information we receive is MOST importantly for us. If we have received it, that is so we may use it. Use it most often to know what we "were" putting our focus on. Use it to choose "now". Here is a story.

The street preacher

On the corner, the preacher was given a message from God.
"The truck is coming. Get out of the way NOW".
So as he always did, he passed the message on to the crowd.
Just as he spoke the last word of the message, the truck hit him
Hello Delight,
If anyone wishes to find wisdom they should look within them selves where the True self resides.

[music]

In a very real way, all is unity, so true channelling is really just contacting the parts of ourself that are usually hidden from this reality.

Then there are those who "channel" their own ego, their own needs or insecurities, or for mercenary or agenda-based reasons.

[Delight]

Hello Delight,
If anyone wishes to find wisdom they should look within them selves where the True self resides.

Yes, this is case. There is a True self. This true self is ideally directing my experience in the world, not an old "program of something else...such as the one saying another person can effect my peace." I state my intention:" I will follow the wisdom from my true self and I will live at peace".

So, true self may lead me to read something, hear something, write something.

It says to me something like: Dear One, you are a loving being. You have innate power and you are peaceful.

Nothing wrong with that message. It is true. It seems like I am affirmed by my true self.

Then I go outside and immediately someone looks at me cross-eyed, my first reaction is "What are you looking at jerk". That too is a message. If I am really coming from the intention to follow wisdom, and if that wisdom says "You are powerful and peaceful", why would I react to anyone as if that person's state determines my thoughts and the feeling of being "dissed"?

Maybe that means in terms of feedback is what I think we' re really responsible to address. What was there in my filter that caused this reaction? Am I really deeply committed to live from that true self?

How would I be able to change if I had no feedback? So, I may use my own behavior as messages and see myself being a person who is not wise.

So I regroup and the next time I see a cross-eyed stare, I am oblivious and feel only compassion. I worked on my filter I see more of my wise self at work.
So the messages are all there. I will use them to my advantage.

[Delight]

I have a subscription to Redice radio. I am listening to Sonia Barrett's interview from 2/26. In the second hour, she is saying much the same thing that I wrote in my first post here. This is so weird!!! She used words like filter in relationship to how we shape our experience. I have to wonder then apropos of "channeling", was I channeling Sonia Barrett, the information SHE channels, some truth or something "beamed". The first reaction I had was "Wow, I must be speaking my truth". Then she says:

The magic of the whole illusion of where we are is that we do not have a clue REALLY about anything except our interactions with what is presented to us. We cannot see all of reality. We always filter what is presented. People have a reality tunnel being experienced subjectively. If something is not in our "thought process', we will not experience it. We are only experiencing what we are experiencing because it is part of our construct. When we don't like where we are, we may make a conscious decision to change THEN it changes. It is a unique journey for us that we pull forward based on our choices.

The important question is "What do I choose to experience"? (end of Sonia Barrett paraphrase)

I chose to experience the information, wrote about it and within a few hours she then presented as affirmation of MY reality.