PDA

View Full Version : USS Enterprise makes final deployment



MorningSong
11th March 2012, 19:56
I just saw this..... here we go folks.... time to be watchful!


By Associated Press, Updated: Sunday, March 11, 8:23 PM

NORFOLK, Va. — The USS Enterprise has set sail on its final voyage.

Officials say the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which was featured in the film “Top Gun,” left Norfolk, Va., around noon on Sunday.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/worlds-first-nuclear-powered-aircraft-carrier-uss-enterprise-makes-final-deployment/2012/03/11/gIQAhGHb5R_story.html

Maia Gabrial
11th March 2012, 21:21
You took the words right out of my mouth, MorningSong. Here we go! They're going through with it anyway....

Does it make any sense that this old boat is going to "crawl" over to the Gulf for its last deployment? The hell with this tub, it's the loss of lives this ridiculous trip is going bring about. Whoever ordered this should be ashamed of themselves.....
I hope that the USS Enterprise becomes a "lawn dart".... :becky:

DreamsInDigital
11th March 2012, 21:27
Well, the boys could always use more subs for their soon to be lawn darting game ;), already took one from the Brits, one from Israel (which is at the bottom of the arabian sea currently, verified by Chinese), and one from Iran.

Maia, it wont be the aircraft carrier, it will be the subs that attempt to sink the aircraft carrier that will be taken for lawn darts.

Though I think Mozart came up with a rather interesting thing of an Pentagon Front Lawn Ship Henge to use all those old aircraft carriers.

Maia Gabrial
11th March 2012, 21:40
I think that the "Ship Henge" will be a splendid addition for ANY lawn. I hear the Eiffel Tower is in demand these days.... :becky:

DreamsInDigital
11th March 2012, 21:42
Lol, Shhhh on the Eiffel Tower. :p The Humans Might Suspect Something ;)

InTheBackground
13th March 2012, 00:00
"What's with this tub," is that it has 8 (I believe?) nuclear reactors on board. It was the earliest nuclear aircraft carrier, built at a time when they weren't quite sure how many they would need, so they just threw a whole bunch in for good measure.

I just want our guys out of harm's way. I want them all home safe and sound, to the families who love them. I want our world to be at peace. So all three carriers and their entourage peacefully making it back to home port is what I will make my intent.

Harmoniques
13th March 2012, 04:33
I really wouldn't call it a "tub". I spent 30 months onboard the "Big E". She displaced 90,000 tons, 8 reactors, 5 thousand crew members and 90 aircraft. Yeah she might be old but to know her is to love her. I always came home safe.

Calz
13th March 2012, 04:56
I really wouldn't call it a "tub". I spent 30 months onboard the "Big E". She displaced 90,000 tons, 8 reactors, 5 thousand crew members and 90 aircraft. Yeah she might be old but to know her is to love her. I always came home safe.

Thanks for your post.

No idea how long ago your 30 months on board was ... but just as a personal hunch how many of the current crew members would you guess have heard and are aware of the "false flag" story???


14536
The nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise sits at the pier as sailors move supplies and equipment in preparation for the ships final deployment.

jcocks
13th March 2012, 05:04
I think perhaps the galactics could ensure that the throttle gets stuck on this thing. Could you imagine how fast it could go with 11(!!) nuclear reactors onboard? Should throw up some impressive rooster tails! And give those bastards a (fast) moving target.... Making sure it doesn't crash or anything of course....

Or they could teleport the whole thing back to where it came from with a sticky note : "Found this floating around the gulf. Thought it could be yours."

It's about time something happened to at least make a dent in the status-quo. Things need to change, and that change, I beleive, won't happen without some pain. The less,the better, but it is still neccessary......

Harmoniques
13th March 2012, 05:10
My tour of Duty was November 88' to May 90'. At that time the only communication with the outside was the good ole' snail mail. Today's internet access onboard is available and the current false story, I'm sure, is topic of discussion. I don't see how the outcome of the false flag could come to fruition. A carrier would not enter the Straits of Hormuz. We have aircraft to do the "Dirty Deed".

DreamsInDigital
13th March 2012, 06:57
Harmoniques,

Thank you for your service to our country, and also..thank you for your contributions and some real solid experienced logic in a thread like this. It's greatly appreciated. I was informed though and so I wanted to ask since you have your experience, that at one time recently we had four carrier groups in the gulf but removed them to 'calm things down'. So maybe that behavior has changed and they now do send them in? I agree though I don't see how with internet access and the FF attempt or prospect that is being intimated could possibly be pulled off. To many people know about it, and IMO that's a bad strategy. If such a stunt was intended to be used, the idea would be to keep it as quiet as possible.

Lettherebelight
13th March 2012, 07:40
Interesting how the article in the Washington Post omitted the destination of the Enterprise's final deployment.

schneider
13th March 2012, 07:53
i ask for protection of the crew and ship and peace in the middle east.

InTheBackground
13th March 2012, 12:25
DreamsInDigital, I know of two carrier groups that have been in the news, and the Enterprise would make a third. Not sure of a fourth...

MacStar
13th March 2012, 15:15
Word had it that this was to be de-comissioned very soon,so the alarm bells went off in my head asking why send this old Nuke Loaded Ship to the strait?

If it were to be sunk,it would spell a major disaster.

False-Flag or planned placement with dire consequences?

Calz
13th March 2012, 15:24
Word had it that this was to be de-comissioned very soon,so the alarm bells went off in my head asking why send this old Nuke Loaded Ship to the strait?

If it were to be sunk,it would spell a major disaster.

False-Flag or planned placement with dire consequences?


Yes if you have followed the appropriate threads or articles the obvious speculation is that with it due to be decommissioned and the cost involved with 8 (I think it is) nuclear reactors it becomes a prime "target" to "dump" it and the nuclear waste in the gulf region as opposed to many millions of dollars to handle it here.

Look into the previous naval false flags and you will see newer ships moved out of harms way and older ships left to be attacked.

Perhaps we have all built up such a hardened scepticism of the "war pigs" and their ways of "justifying" such things that we connect the dots even if they are not there.

That said ... red flags abound on this one ...

MacStar
13th March 2012, 15:44
Let's hope those working on the "Other Side" are taking care of this as Monatague Keen's last message.

Cheers Carlz