How to predict earthquakes - Ken Ring

[witchy1]

This comes from a guy in NZ with a large following who has a method of earthquake predictions that would appear to be correct. Using the Stars, tides, earths electromagentic waves, sea temperature etc he provides regular updates to those who follow him. He tweeted about the Christchurch Earthquake well in advance and many others.

Ken provides the above link in his email and states in part

"You will not find this information anywhere on the internet. The reason this is not peer-reviewed is because no science journal will print it. It is my own development and I have already tried to interest the science community and failed. Only the Russians showed any interest!

http://truebluenz.com/2011/03/15/russian-government-earthquake-forecasters-accept-input-from-ken-ring/ (http://truebluenz.com/2011/03/15/russian-government-earthquake-forecasters-accept-input-from-ken-ring/)

I urge the reader to share it widely, in the hope that it reduces anxieties. The whole process is transparent and I have laid out reasons at every stage. It is all science and all, as far as I can see, commonsense. No doubt some scientist will publish it and declare it his/her own work, and win an international prize. But science is not about winning awards or competitions, or for cash prizes for speaking well to the media. Science is for sharing truths.

I am wiping egg off my face as I had originally thought Ken was predicting a major earthquake for USA and other parts of the world in 14 days time, and after almost completing copying his email for everyone to see, I was kindly advised by Jonathon that the link to the original email was a year out of date............ So please please please accept my sincerest apologies for any unnessary worry and concern.

Lesson learnt :o

I will share his email as it has some great information in it anyway

Witchy

PS - Mods, can you please change the thread title as I dont appear to be able to. Thanks

[witchy1]

Kens email of today (16th March 2012). This is long, but well worth the time to read and digest. I will split it up. He goes on to describe how we can predict it for ourselves.....
Newsletter, 15 March 2012
Hi everybody, thanks for reading this.


Titanic - Was the Perigee Involved?

WAS THE PERIGEE INVOLVED?

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/13101685/titanic-fate-written-in-the-stars/2/date/asc/1405157/#comments (http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/13101685/titanic-fate-written-in-the-stars/2/date/asc/1405157/#comments)

Early in 1912 the closest perigee (closest earth-moon distance for the 27-day month) in 1400 years raised the tides so much that more icebergs were able to drift south into shipping lanes. “The "once-in-many-lifetimes" event brought together the Moon's closest approach to the Earth for 1400 years, a near encounter between the Earth and the Sun, and a spring tide. All these factors contributed to abnormally high sea levels which helped dislodge grounded icebergs and send them into the shipping lanes of the North Atlantic, it is claimed”. In 1912 there was also extreme flooding in the UK, especially Ireland.

So how about earthquakes due to this perigee? In July 1912 a 7.2mag hit Kennicitt, USA. In August Turkey received a 7.8mag. A 7.0mag struck southern Iceland and another 7mag hit Mexico. And NZ did not escape. In May 1912 a 5.7mag struck Bay of Plenty and in February 1913 a 5.3mag hit the South island West Coast. And in November 1914, the third biggest ever recorded here occurred with its North Island centre close to Tauranga, felt over most of the North Island.

It is of interest because the closest perigee in 17-19 years occurred around February/March of 2011, when Christchurch received the brunt of such brutal seismic activity and we might ask, was there seismic activity in 1912 for Christchurch? Unfortunately there are not well-kept records pre-the 1930s. But we can note that 19 years later, the Metonic Cycle of the moon gives us 1931, the year of the Napier earthquake.

Extreme events also repeat on a 36-year cycle, due to the Jupiter-Saturn opposition return that induces more solar activity. And we find that 36 years later in May 1948 there was a 6mag in N Canterbury. Following this line of enquiry, 2010-12 finds equivalence with 1974-77. 1975 was the year of the Haicheng, China, 7.0mag event, just across a short stretch of water from Japan. Fortunately 90,000 people were evacuated just beforehand. 36 years later came the Japan tsunami. Although both 1974-75 and 2010-11 saw unusually cold winters in the South Island, there is no specific report of a seismic event in the South Island in 1974-75, but 17 years later in 1994 there was the biggest number of seismic events ever in NZ in a single year, when, in the Arthurs Pass region, 12,000 events were recorded. 17.7 years is the perigee return cycle, as each traverse is 8.85 years. In 1974, too, the Murrumbigee River reached the same flooding level as it did in this flooding year in Wagga Wagga. And there was a 5mag in Canterbury in September of 1974, so the year did not even pass without a seismic look-in.
The next unusually close perigee will be around 2016.

1912 turns the spotlight on perigees once again, and brings to out attention that NZ has not been immune to the effects of close perigees over the years. But because many in NZ seemed not to have heard of perigee before first attention to it on this website throughout last year found us thrust into the media spotlight, the Christchurch earthquakes seemed, to the public at large, to have come out of the blue. But they had been around for ages. Liquefaction also became a part of the new vocabulary for those outside of Christchurch. Yet anyone in Christchurch has been aware for years that underground basement parking for new buildings in the region was always impossible because of water flowing voluminously under the city through the shingle base.

It is time we incorporated the incidence of perigee into our psyche, not only for earthquakes but also other extreme events to have occurred in this country, with an eye to preparation in the years to come. We have seen how ignorant the scientists were, and this even by their own admission, and really knew no more about what was going on than any lay folk. It has been a learning curve for all. Let us not lose that new awareness, but use it to advantage. It must be obvious by now that perigees feature in earthquake timing. To test this I tallied all above-4mag events recorded in NZ, between Cape Reinga and Bluff, not counting Kermadecs nor locations to the east of the North Island, from 1 Sept 2010 to present. There have been about 900 over 550 days. Looking at the numbers of these above-4mag events happening within 3 days of perigee, i.e. in perigee week, over the entire time period, these came to about 300. Of all the above-4 events:

53 related to P#2 Sept 8, 2010
12 related to P#6, Oct 7, 2010
11 related to P#9, Nov 4, 2010
9 related to P#12, Dec 26, 2010
69 related to P#9, Feb 19, 2011
14 related to P#1, March 20, 2011
8 related to P#4, Apr 17, 2011
6 related to P#8, May 15, 2011
33 related to P#12, June 12, 2011
10 related to P#13, July 8, 2011
30 related to P#10, Dec 22, 2011
23 related to P#13, Jan 18, 2012

In other words about a third of all the above 4’s that have occurred since Sept 3 have arrived in a small window of 7 days that contain a perigee. This means:

There is double the chance of an above-4 mag earthquake occurring on any day during a perigee week.

In order to understand the mathematics of this more easily, imagine that for each day of a particular sample month, one hypothetical above-4 is received, except that in the perigee week of that month (let’s say, for example, a perigee is on the 14th , so the perigee week would be 11th-17th), such that for each day of that perigee week, not 1 but 2 are received, as below:

1st: 1 received
2nd: 1 received
3rd: 1 received
4th: 1 received
5th: 1 received
6th: 1 received
7th: 1 received
8th: 1 received
9th: 1 received
10th: 1 received
Perigee week
11th: 2 received
12th: 2 received
13th: 2 received
14th: 2 received
15th: 2 received
16th: 2 received
17th: 2 received
18th: 1 received
19th: 1 received
20th: 1 received
21st: 1 received
22nd: 1 received
23rd: 1 received
24th: 1 received
25th: 1 received
26th: 1 received
27th: 1 received
28th: 1 received
29th: 1 received
30th: 1 received
31st: 1 received

Here, 38 in total are received, with 14 in the perigee week, making roughly 30% of total. In the perigee week of the example there is double the chance of receiving one, compared with one on any other day. The extent to which the perigee week is not as highly represented by above-4s is the extent by which the double-the-chance factor is reduced.

So we might ask, how is the double chance of an above-4 arriving at or near perigee not significant?

It is unlikely that this pattern is confined to NZ. Neither is it a surprising result, because one can imagine that a closer moon would place more stress on the inner earth. But it is one factor only, and this time taken in a calculation only for NZ. We have not looked at what earthquakes occurred in the same time period in other countries. Totalling all above 4-s worldwide would probably yield an even more dramatic result for the perigee influence, but I simply do not have the resources for this. Perhaps a GNS employee may have access to these figures. It is probably an exercise worth doing. More on this perigee factor later in this newsletter

[witchy1]

An easy earthquake monitor system?
It was interesting watching recently posted Youtube video footage, how most buildings in Christchurch survived. So what made the difference? Inappropriate construction? Not that you can blame architects etc, they only do their best. But I did notice from other videos that pool water goes crazy during earthquakes, making mini-tsunamis. An easy detector would be for each multistoreyed building to have a small spa-sized pool in a locked room, with a wave/vibration detector connected to a threshold alarm bell. No need to rely on GNS, CD etc for warnings that come too late. There could even be digital gauges from it in each room where people are working, so they have a constant visual indicator. Plus, results could be computerized to show increases leading up to certain days, and then away again. People would then learn when to be on alert.

Maybe this has already been invented – I would hope so. It would seem quite workable. In fact, you could make this yourself in about an hour. Get a basin set up containing water in the basement, with a light shining on it (for 24hr surveillance). Position a webcam looking onto it. They cost about $35 at Dick Smith.

http://www.dicksmith.co.nz/product/XH9867/microsoft-lifecam-vx-800-webcam (http://www.dicksmith.co.nz/product/XH9867/microsoft-lifecam-vx-800-webcam)

Presumably the water would move before the building came down on you. Little ripples would precede the big ones. There would have been small jolts before the 6.3mag. It's the same with people and animals. Before a wild animal attacks it gets an angry look in its eye, the body tenses etc. If a human does something, he/she takes body purchase, looks towards the thing, then starts to move on it. There are always initial signals. If you used a webcam connected to your computer, you could also watch it on your cellphone away from home.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Tracking Air Pressures
We are finding that our estimates of forthcoming air pressure differences are accurate enough to use to forecast the possibility of coming earthquakes with some degree of confidence. They will not be exact copies, but then it is an inexact science. The reader can decide whether or not the results are usable. All that we are looking for is trend indications. In some cases a trend upward is exactly the reverse of what occurs. It doesn’t matter. The earthquake potential is tied to sudden increase OR sudden decrease, so the swing is the important factor, not necessarily the swing’s direction. Initial results were encouraging. (Dark blue line= actual air pressure, purple=our estimate made 7 years before, based on moon cycles)


http://i1.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-01jpg.085307.jpg


http://i2.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-02.085453.jpg
I posted the tweet of 14 Feb saying to expect a big one in a week +/- 3 days. The RAP difference was a steep rise on the 14th,


http://i3.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-03.085522.jpg
Getting to the highest point for the month on 16th, and as what goes up must come down, preceded an equal drop of about 20mbs. This kind of electrical stress in the atmosphere is symbolic of stress in the electromagnetic field around the globe. The 22 Feb 2011 earthquake was the eventual release, at least I assumed it would be at the time.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Can we make an earthquake predictor? You decide.
You will not find this information anywhere on the internet. The reason this is not peer-reviewed is because no science journal will print it. It is my own development and I have already tried to interest the science community and failed. Only the Russians showed any interest! http://truebluenz.com/2011/03/15/russian-government-earthquake-forecasters-accept-input-from-ken-ring/ (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/w/)
I urge the reader to share it widely, in the hope that it reduces anxieties. The whole process is transparent and I have laid out reasons at every stage. It is all science and all, as far as I can see, commonsense. No doubt some scientist will publish it and declare it his/her own work, and win an international prize. But science is not about winning awards or competitions, or for cash prizes for speaking well to the media. Science is for sharing truths.
Whatever disturbs the electromagnetic field of the earth, inducing stress that manifests as internal pressure, requiring release, has to be considered.
I list these primarily:
· planets causing changes in the sun,
· sun causing changes in the moon,
· moon causing changes inside the earth.

As well, there are direct influences from and between each. The earth affects the moon, and the moon, albeit very slightly, affects the sun. There are signs like changing air pressures and timing of tides that pertain to these. The air pressures denote electrical changes in the atmosphere, in part a microsketch of what is happening to the whole globe. For instance, you cannot get the electrical field look of iron filings around a magnet, without the magnet. The tides show us what is happening beneath the earth, because the land pushing upwards each day relieving internal pressure from the daily moon’s transit actually creates the visible sea tide. To arrive at an earthquake predicting model, we have to use what we can determine well beforehand. We cannot for example use sun spot data, although we can use what creates sunspots, which is interplanetary aspects and angles, which some call astrology.

[Mare]

Hi Witchy1,

it appears that the link to the full article cannot be found. Can you fix that please? I would like to read that, thanks.

[witchy1]

Factor 1: Tide heights
I have plotted tide heights for Lyttelton every day, against numbers of earthquakes above 3mag, to find out if the largest tides per month, called king (or spring) tides, correlated to the largest earth tremors. The assumption was that tides are the result of the land daily pulling vertically away from the water, to relieve the internal pressure beneath ground, that is generated daily by the transit of the moon. There is therefore the Land Tide, which creates the sea tide. The biggest sea tides (or rather, their drops at low tide times) denote the largest land pressures.


http://i4.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-04.085740.jpg

The recurring result is that kingtides DO occur at the same time as the largest earthquakes. It does not mean that every large kingtide causes an earthquake, but it does mean there are no massive earthquakes outside of kingtide times. There appear to have been no exceptions to this in the time period studied, from 1 September 2010 to present. 18 months of data would be enough to create a rule.


http://i5.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-05.085825.jpg
Rule 1: expect large earthquakes ONLY at kingtide times.


Factor 2: Air pressures (RAPR and RAPD)
http://i6.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-06.085932.jpg
The air undergoes changes just before a big shake. People have reported headaches, animals feeling dizzy, blue flashes on the horizon, birds falling silent and cirrus clouds that denote higher than normal pressures aloft. Some have confused the latter with aerial topdressing and imagined “chemtrails” “caused” the earthquakes, an understandable mistake.


Dark blue = earthquakes above-3M, purple= estimated air pressures.
Air pressures therefore tend to rise (RAPR) or fall (RAPD) just before big shakes. Although there are rises without shakes, there are few shakes without rises or drops.

Rule 2: If air pressure rises or falls suddenly, be prepared for a possible shake if you are in an earthquake-prone zone.


Factor 3: Moon factors
The moon –earth distance is always changing. Once per month the moon comes closer to us. 13.6 days later it is furthest away. I have shown that in the week of the month that the moon comes closer, more earthquakes tend to occur. The moon was second closest to earth on 8 Sept 2010, in the week of the 7.1mag, one of the biggest in our recorded history.
Here is a well-made graph submitted to GNS by Chris Vance and reprinted on the GNS Facebook page. I have taken the liberty of listing the relevant perigees.


http://i7.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-07.090251.jpg

Rule 3: expect large earthquake chances to double around perigees.


http://i8.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-08.090133.jpg


http://i9.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-09.090338.jpg
If you look carefully at these, it can be seen that purple lines accompany each of the mini-earthquake peaks.


Factor 5: Planetary Alignments
Planets like the big gas giants Jupiter and Saturn cause tides in the sun. These tides become sunspots, flares and coronal holes, which disturb our electromagnetic field. We are only 8 minutes from the sun at the speed of the electromagnetic radiation, the solar wind. Five main planets are involved, and 5 aspects, and their combinations are weighted. But they must combine with all the other factors to be potent.
Dark blue = earthquakes above-3M, purple= estimated aspects.


http://i10.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-10.090448.jpg


http://i1.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-11.090506.jpg
Implications of the above
What I have tried to show is that the factors measurable in advance, using previous moon cycles (for barometric readings for the future, tide height information, and position of perigees and other moon events), sun and planet information (using astrological techniques to determine aspect angles, being conjunction, opposition, squares, trines and sextiles etc), and plotting these ahead of time, can reveal good strike rates. I suggest the puzzle is solved, earthquakes can be predicted. Alternatively, times to reduce anxiety are indicated – times when no perigee is around, no other lunar combinations, no kingtide, no planetary alignments and even air pressures. This in itself is of HUGE value.

[witchy1]

Hi Witchy1,

it appears that the link to the full article cannot be found. Can you fix that please? I would like to read that, thanks.
Parent Post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?42542-Major-Earthquake-alert-14-days-USA-and-others.&p=449693&viewfull=1#post449693)

Hi Mare, its been taken down already. I am posting all the information now, but can only do it in bits. (lots of planetary stuff coming)

If you want to know more about him: This is his website: http://www.predictweather.co.nz/

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/kiwis-terrified-by-fresh-earthquake-prediction/story-e6frf7jx-1226015375215

[witchy1]

He has a huge following in NZ. The mainstream scientists think hes nuts of course. BUT he does get it right and he definately predicted via a tweet - the Christchurch one. He is predicting another one in Christchurch for the 20th March via above link:

"Mr Ring for his part said he believed most people would rather be safe than sorry.

"If the information was there wouldn't you rather have access to it?

"How terrible would it be if I knew all the seismic signs were there and I didn't say anything? I couldn't live with myself.
"If you'd rather not know, then please don't read it."

[kersley]

What's with all the black writing?Can someone please re post this ,s o i can actually read the report?
Thanks

[Jonathon]

Witchy - that 1st article posting of March 15 is from 2011, not 2012, so that wasn't yesterday. Did you paste the wrong article or did you miss the year?

[witchy1]

What did the planet aspects alone show for the big ones?
http://i2.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-12.090613.jpg



Alignments: Earth-Sun-Mer-Mars (square Ven) / Sun-Jup-Uranus (at 45° Midpoint to Earth alignment). Also of note at this time : 6.4 quake in Fiji, 4.5 in California and 5.3 in Japan


http://i4.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-14.090649.jpg


Coming up
21 March 2012
Moon: -2 New Moon
Alignments: Earth-Moon-Mer-Sun / Ven 45° Midpoint


http://i5.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-15.090728.jpg





http://i7.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-17.090806.jpg


7 April 2012
Moon: Full Moon / +1 Perigee #4
Alignments: Moon-Earth-Sun / Ven 45° Midpoint / Sat 45° Midpoint


http://i8.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-18.090849.jpg





http://i10.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-20.090918.jpg


16 April 2012
Moon: -4 New Moon
Alignments: Sun-Earth-Saturn (Mer 45° Midpoint, Ven 45° Midpoint) / Ven-Sun-Ur (Jup 45° Midpoint)


http://i1.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-21.091016.jpg



http://i3.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-23.091059.jpg
There are more times to be warned of, and a fuller package will soon be available for the rest of the year and next year showing all risk dates.

[kersley]

Can you please answer Jonahon's question?

[ViralSpiral]

I was sent a mail from a friend who is by no means a jitterbug (he is a "seer" though :)), and is also a subscriber to earthchangesmedia. He periodically points me in certain directions, but this message was loud and clear. It was about this article:


Important variations in the magnetic field, observed by satellites in certain areas of the globe, could herald an inversion of the poles. This phenomenon has already come about several times in the history of the planet. Is the Earth losing its compass? This is what a study by the Department of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism of the Paris Geophysical Institute (l'Institut de physique du globe de Paris [IPG]) would have us believe.

http://uk.f345.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1%5f3536525%5fAKyyo0IAAPcNT2MXpQ8c5zLEJDk&pid=2&fid=Inbox&inline=1&appid=YahooMailNeoCL


Here (http://www.earthchangesmedia.com/publish/article-9162532473.php)the full article. Of course, I do not understand the significance of its relevance for now, as there are no details however, some dots may be connecting...
May also be hot air. Just putting it out there

[witchy1]

The 62-yr cycle
Stocks and Shares
Weather systems on the earth are driven by solar-magnetic connections modulated by the moon's orbit interrupting the solar wind. The solar system barycentre is a 36-38-yr turnaround, which is the reason for the sea-tide cycle of around 19 years. The sunspot cycle takes 22 years. The sunspot period is between 55-65 yrs.
Cycles are apparent in climate data. The approximately 60-year cycle shows up in many areas. This cycle length is not exactly 60 years and varies by a few years between various climatic phenomena and locations. Climate models do not account for this cycle.
The following figure is from a study by Basil Copeland and Anthony Watts, showing a Morelet wavelet analysis of the HadCRUT3 global temperature anomalies [http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/23/evidence-of-a-lunisolar-influence-on-decadal-and-bidecadal-oscillations-in-globally-averaged-temperature-trends/] (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/yd/) The ~62-year cycle is clearly visible.


http://i4.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-24.091226.jpg
The following figure shows anomalies from 1850 to 2009 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amo_timeseries_1856-present.svg (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/yh/)].

The cycle length is approximately 62 years with maxima around 1878, 1943 and 2004, and minima around 1912 and 1974.


http://i5.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-25.091304.jpg
Around 55- to 70-year oscillations have characterized the North Atlantic ocean-atmosphere variability over the past 8,000 years. The average is 62.5 yrs.

Southwest US Drought Cycle

The following figure shows the southwest United States drought index 1900 - 2002
[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2002/may/Reg107Dv00_palm06_01000502_pg.gif (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/yk/)]

The cycle length is approximately 64 years, with maxima (wet) around 1918 and 1982 and a minimum (drought) in 1955.


Add a title
http://i6.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-26.091357.jpg
(the NOAA is equivalent to the NZ NIWA and the Australian CSIRO)
A UN Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) report found that fish catches vary according to 60-yr cycles and developed a model (shown below) to predict future fluctuations [http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e0aa.htm#FigureA (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/yu/)]


http://i7.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-27.091429.jpg


Sea surface temperatures
http://i8.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-28.091455.jpg
The above figure shows the global ENSO sea surface temperature for 1850 – 2009 with orange lines added to highlight the approximately 60-year cycle [http://www.jisao.washington.edu/data/globalsstenso/ (http://predictweather.cmail5.com/t/r/l/dtluktt/slturlka/jl/)]


http://i9.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-29.091533.jpg
For global temperatures also
Jupiter is the most influential.
The Wolf cycle (solar sunspot cycle) has a period that fluctuates but averages 11.2 years. Jupiter’s solar orbital cycle is 11.9 Earth years. Saturn, the second-largest planet, has a solar orbital cycle of 29.4 Earth years. This leads to Jupiter-Saturn conjunction every 19.9 years (J/S Synodic Cycle). (As a coincidence, in the Maya calendar 1 Katun = 19.7 years.) The Solar System Barycentre is approx 36 years. It would seem the 18-20 year tidal cycle on earth, with respect to climate cycles, tides and repetitiveness of extreme events, is a direct result of the movements of these two biggest planets, Jupiter and Saturn. A full cycle of Jupiter / Saturn around the sun (J/S Tri-Synodic Cycle) is 59.6 years – in other words it takes 60 (59.6) years for the Earth / Jupiter / Saturn reach the same relative alignment around the sun.

The following figure shows the speed of the Sun relative to the CMSS showing “20 and 60 year oscillations”. It shows a 60-year cycle with peaks similar to the global average temperatures shown at the start of this document – around 1880, 1940 and 2000.


http://i10.cmail5.com/ei/r/29/5DE/998/csimport/March-Newsie-30.092653.jpg
The Cycle
The 1860s-1890s were cold and wet. The 1890s to the 1930s were hot and dry (Great Australian Drought, Great Depression, Dustbowl Years in Oklahoma), the 1940s-1970s were cold and wet (in the late 1970s they said an Ice Age was coming), the 1970s – the 2000s were hot and dry again, and now we are back on the cool, wet side of this cycle.

And that is the end of the email as relates to earthquate predictions

[witchy1]

Witchy - that 1st article posting of March 15 is from 2011, not 2012, so that wasn't yesterday. Did you paste the wrong article or did you miss the year?

Parent Post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?42542-Major-Earthquake-alert-14-days-USA-and-others.&p=449736&viewfull=1#post449736)


Dear Jonathon, thanks for pointing that out......... and OMG - I will change the thread title to predicting earthquakes. I read that article 3 times and didnt pick it up and just thought Ken had linked to it in his email as current!

Crisis averted - How embarrassing............SORRY everyone.

*hangs head in embarrassment*

[ViralSpiral]

Time is fleeting, madness takes its toll

;)



http://iainhall.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/timewarp.jpg?w=584

[ThePythonicCow]

PS - Mods, can you please change the thread title as I dont appear to be able to. Thanks
Done :).

[Hervé]

The Op was first posted around March 13, 2011 coming from the "What does it mean" website dear to disinfo agent Sorcha Faal/David Booth... not held in very high esteem by most researchers (do a search on this forum on what Bill Ryan posted on these sites and their authors).

[ThePythonicCow]

Crisis averted - How embarrassing............SORRY everyone.
Better to err predicting a quake that didn't happen ... than vice versa :).

[witchy1]

The Op was first posted around March 13, 2011 coming from the "What does it mean" website dear to disinfo agent Sorcha Faal/David Booth... not held in very high esteem by most researchers (do a search on this forum on what Bill Ryan posted on these sites and their authors).

Hi Amzer Zo - is this what you are referring to: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?14341-Threat-of-Earthquake-Predicted-For-E.-W.-Coast-Of-US-and-Mississipi/page3 Post 90?

If I could kindly suggest not comparing Ken Ring to Sarcha - most people here are fully aware of his misdeeds. I was unable to see the replica in what Ken said to what the others said in the above post - other than many people agreed there would be movements.

Here is a list of the many earthquakes that occured on the 20th March 2011 (you can search the map by date) http://www.quake-maps.com/?s_date=2011-03-20

For anyone wanting up to date inforamtion on earthquakes - see here http://www.quake-maps.com/ This as at today