Maia Gabrial
17th March 2012, 23:09
With all the banksters being arrested and possibly charged, my question is why the IRS isn't on the list with them? If there ever were a corrupt organization that needed to be put out of business that would be the Internal Revenue Service....
This video deals with the new IRS licensing scheme, which is now
the subject of a lawsuit, from the angle of some 350,000
independent tax return preparers (workers) who will be run out of
business, leaving only the major firms who would then have a good
deal less competition.
Which is an extremely valid and legal angle to approach it.
I see this also as a way to CONTROL those who prepare taxes. If you
need a license to prepare taxes, then you had better prepare the
tax papers the way the IRS wants or your license can be withdrawn
or refused renewal.
It has elsewhere been demonstrated that independent tax prepares
often come up with different numbers than major tax preparing
firms, that almost always means a larger return for the taxpayer.
Yeah, I think it's a control scheme as well as limiting competition
for major firms.
Video:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9836.html
Goodman Green
- Brasscheck
P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.
That's how we grow. Thanks.
Tax Preparers Sue the IRS, Fight Unlawful Licensing Scheme
Sweeping new regulations could impact millions of taxpayers
WEB RELEASE: March 13, 2012
Media Contact:
Bob Ewing (703) 682-9320
Institute for Justice
Arlington, Va.—The IRS has imposed an unlawful licensing scheme that benefits powerful industry insiders and could affect millions of taxpayers—and more than 350,000 independent tax return preparers.
That is why today three independent tax preparers—Sabina Loving of Chicago, John Gambino of Hoboken, N.J., and Elmer Kilian of Eagle, Wisc.,—have joined forces with the Institute for Justice in filing suit against the IRS in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
“Congress never gave the IRS the authority to license tax preparers, and the IRS can’t give itself that power,” said Attorney Dan Alban of the Institute for Justice, the nation’s leading legal advocate for the rights of entrepreneurs. “This is an unlawful power grab by one of the most powerful federal agencies.”
The new regulations, which were imposed last year and take effect this tax season, force tax preparers to get IRS permission before they can work. The burden of compliance will fall most heavily on independent tax return preparers and small businesses. They require all paid tax return preparers—except for attorneys, CPAs and several categories of politically powerful “enrolled agents”—to become a “registered tax return preparer” by paying extra fees, passing a government exam, and taking 15 hours of continuing education classes every year.
The regulations are not being applied evenly to all tax preparers, and instead exempt certain favored professions and types of businesses that have the resources to lobby for special privileges. As noted, attorneys and certified public accountants (CPAs) are exempt, thanks in large part to powerful interest groups, such as the American Institute of CPAs, which successfully lobbied for an exemption.
Unsurprisingly, big tax preparation firms, such as H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt, support the licensing scheme. As The Wall Street Journal explained: “Cheering the new regulations are big tax preparers like H&R Block, who are only too happy to see the feds swoop in to put their mom-and-pop seasonal competitors out of business.”
“These regulations are typical government protectionism,” said IJ Senior Attorney Scott Bullock. “They benefit powerful industry insiders at the expense of entrepreneurs and consumers, who will likely have fewer options and face higher prices. But tax preparers have a right to earn an honest living without getting permission from the IRS. And taxpayers—not the IRS—should be the ones who decide who prepares their taxes.”
Institute for Justice
This video deals with the new IRS licensing scheme, which is now
the subject of a lawsuit, from the angle of some 350,000
independent tax return preparers (workers) who will be run out of
business, leaving only the major firms who would then have a good
deal less competition.
Which is an extremely valid and legal angle to approach it.
I see this also as a way to CONTROL those who prepare taxes. If you
need a license to prepare taxes, then you had better prepare the
tax papers the way the IRS wants or your license can be withdrawn
or refused renewal.
It has elsewhere been demonstrated that independent tax prepares
often come up with different numbers than major tax preparing
firms, that almost always means a larger return for the taxpayer.
Yeah, I think it's a control scheme as well as limiting competition
for major firms.
Video:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9836.html
Goodman Green
- Brasscheck
P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.
That's how we grow. Thanks.
Tax Preparers Sue the IRS, Fight Unlawful Licensing Scheme
Sweeping new regulations could impact millions of taxpayers
WEB RELEASE: March 13, 2012
Media Contact:
Bob Ewing (703) 682-9320
Institute for Justice
Arlington, Va.—The IRS has imposed an unlawful licensing scheme that benefits powerful industry insiders and could affect millions of taxpayers—and more than 350,000 independent tax return preparers.
That is why today three independent tax preparers—Sabina Loving of Chicago, John Gambino of Hoboken, N.J., and Elmer Kilian of Eagle, Wisc.,—have joined forces with the Institute for Justice in filing suit against the IRS in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
“Congress never gave the IRS the authority to license tax preparers, and the IRS can’t give itself that power,” said Attorney Dan Alban of the Institute for Justice, the nation’s leading legal advocate for the rights of entrepreneurs. “This is an unlawful power grab by one of the most powerful federal agencies.”
The new regulations, which were imposed last year and take effect this tax season, force tax preparers to get IRS permission before they can work. The burden of compliance will fall most heavily on independent tax return preparers and small businesses. They require all paid tax return preparers—except for attorneys, CPAs and several categories of politically powerful “enrolled agents”—to become a “registered tax return preparer” by paying extra fees, passing a government exam, and taking 15 hours of continuing education classes every year.
The regulations are not being applied evenly to all tax preparers, and instead exempt certain favored professions and types of businesses that have the resources to lobby for special privileges. As noted, attorneys and certified public accountants (CPAs) are exempt, thanks in large part to powerful interest groups, such as the American Institute of CPAs, which successfully lobbied for an exemption.
Unsurprisingly, big tax preparation firms, such as H&R Block and Jackson Hewitt, support the licensing scheme. As The Wall Street Journal explained: “Cheering the new regulations are big tax preparers like H&R Block, who are only too happy to see the feds swoop in to put their mom-and-pop seasonal competitors out of business.”
“These regulations are typical government protectionism,” said IJ Senior Attorney Scott Bullock. “They benefit powerful industry insiders at the expense of entrepreneurs and consumers, who will likely have fewer options and face higher prices. But tax preparers have a right to earn an honest living without getting permission from the IRS. And taxpayers—not the IRS—should be the ones who decide who prepares their taxes.”
Institute for Justice