The Meritocracy Manifesto~The New World Order Up For Discussion

[cellardoor]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-7CeMoulbw&feature=g-all-f&context=G2a70037FAAAAAAAATAA

The Meritocracy Movement stems from http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk
The so called Illuminati secret religion.

Blessings

[Siberia9]

These ideas are coming from the Bavarian Illuminati and its sub groups. They are the same ones that ran a failed experiment called The Soviet Union, as well as many revolutions in history. They are differant from The Brotherhood, the 13 family's that are running things now that people call the Illuminati. Stalin was funded by the Brotherhood and took over the experiment and began his population reduction programs etc.

So your choice is bad or worse. "There is going to be a New World Order, its just a matter of what kind" -The Bavarian Illuminati. I say neither, I will raise my own children and I will give them my house when I die because they already will be living in it and its none of these peoples business.

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy. I vote we start over with very early American ideals and then base all our laws against govt, making them powerless to do anything but serve us. The only law you really need against the People is, are they over 18, are they damaging anyone property, is anyone being forced against their will? That is the only real measuring stick the law needs. People will find their own way in a truly free society, we dont need to hand over power to some other group that wants to raise your children and "take care of you". We've had enough of that crap and anyway someone new always takes over and the next thing you know the baby's get sacrificed and the govt tics get fat, no thanks.

[EnergyGardener]

These ideas are coming from the Bavarian Illuminati and its sub groups. They are the same ones that ran a failed experiment called The Soviet Union, as well as many revolutions in history. They are differant from The Brotherhood, the 13 family's that are running things now that people call the Illuminati. Stalin was funded by the Brotherhood and took over the experiment and began his population reduction programs etc.

So your choice is bad or worse. "There is going to be a New World Order, its just a matter of what kind" -The Bavarian Illuminati. I say neither, I will raise my own children and I will give them my house when I die because they already will be living in it and its none of these peoples business.

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy. I vote we start over with very early American ideals and then base all our laws against govt, making them powerless to do anything but serve us. The only law you really need against the People is, are they over 18, are they damaging anyone property, is anyone being forced against their will? That is the only real measuring stick the law needs. People will find their own way in a truly free society, we dont need to hand over power to some other group that wants to raise your children and "take care of you". We've had enough of that crap and anyway someone new always takes over and the next thing you know the baby's get sacrificed and the govt tics get fat, no thanks.

Siberia9: I second that!:wizard:

[Maia Gabrial]

We were a "Representative Republic" and you're right that it was much better, Siberia9.

[cellardoor]

These ideas are coming from the Bavarian Illuminati and its sub groups. They are the same ones that ran a failed experiment called The Soviet Union, as well as many revolutions in history. They are differant from The Brotherhood, the 13 family's that are running things now that people call the Illuminati. Stalin was funded by the Brotherhood and took over the experiment and began his population reduction programs etc.

So your choice is bad or worse. "There is going to be a New World Order, its just a matter of what kind" -The Bavarian Illuminati. I say neither, I will raise my own children and I will give them my house when I die because they already will be living in it and its none of these peoples business.

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy. I vote we start over with very early American ideals and then base all our laws against govt, making them powerless to do anything but serve us. The only law you really need against the People is, are they over 18, are they damaging anyone property, is anyone being forced against their will? That is the only real measuring stick the law needs. People will find their own way in a truly free society, we dont need to hand over power to some other group that wants to raise your children and "take care of you". We've had enough of that crap and anyway someone new always takes over and the next thing you know the baby's get sacrificed and the govt tics get fat, no thanks.

They maintain that Marx was not part of the Illuminati but influenced by Hegal one of their grand masters. They denounce communism as dysfunctional and illogical.

The war between the rich elite and the ordinary people is timeless. It is the axis around which history has revolved, and the fundamental issue remains undecided to this day. Karl Marx thought that the destruction of the capitalist ruling class was dialectically inevitable, and that Communism would resolve the dialectic once and for all in favour of the people. Marx's analysis was correct, but his solution was wrong. Communism is as soulless and destructive of the human spirit as capitalism, and has demonstrated itself to be backward, totalitarian and an enemy of freedom. A second poison cannot stand as the answer to a first poison.

The final dialectical resolution of the long strife of world history is a political system that enshrines freedom above all else, even to the extent of ensuring that parents cannot brainwash their children. In one generation, hateful religious ideologies would collapse if it were made as difficult as possible for Orthodox Jews, Fundamentalist Christians and Muslims, raving libertarians and ultra capitalists, racists, chauvinists and all the rest to assume that they have the absolute, inalienable right to indoctrinate their children. Every child must be protected. All children should be free to think for themselves, to reach their own views. Isn't that the most basic right of all? To have your own thoughts? That you yourself reached according to your own free will, your own logic, your own personality, regardless of the wishes and beliefs of others? THAT is true freedom. No one is free who has been compelled from their first breath to be a clone of their parents who, in turn, were clones of theirs, all obeying some fanatical ideology expressed in some ancient holy text or economic doctrine, dogmatically and tyrannically passed down from generation to generation from time immemorial. That is the purest slavery.

The ultimate political system is one that recognizes the spiritual dimension of humanity, unlike capitalism and communism, yet lets people explore their spirituality in whatever way they find most inspiring and helpful, without any inflexible, exclusive, dogmatic, hateful ideology.

The ultimate political system is one that is designed to continually evolve to meet the needs of the time.

The ultimate political system is one that always reflects the General Will of the people.

The ultimate political system provides an equal opportunity for everyone. It prevents the creation of dynastic elites. It stops any individual or group from acquiring too many resources, too much power and wealth. It eliminates privilege, nepotism and cronyism.

Meritocracy is that ultimate political system. It is the dialectical end-point. Meritocracy is the inevitable culmination of the long path of political evolution

[jp11]

These ideas are coming from the Bavarian Illuminati and its sub groups. They are the same ones that ran a failed experiment called The Soviet Union, as well as many revolutions in history. They are differant from The Brotherhood, the 13 family's that are running things now that people call the Illuminati. Stalin was funded by the Brotherhood and took over the experiment and began his population reduction programs etc.

So your choice is bad or worse. "There is going to be a New World Order, its just a matter of what kind" -The Bavarian Illuminati. I say neither, I will raise my own children and I will give them my house when I die because they already will be living in it and its none of these peoples business.

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy. I vote we start over with very early American ideals and then base all our laws against govt, making them powerless to do anything but serve us. The only law you really need against the People is, are they over 18, are they damaging anyone property, is anyone being forced against their will? That is the only real measuring stick the law needs. People will find their own way in a truly free society, we dont need to hand over power to some other group that wants to raise your children and "take care of you". We've had enough of that crap and anyway someone new always takes over and the next thing you know the baby's get sacrificed and the govt tics get fat, no thanks.

Because I wasn't sure what democratic republic was I googled it and ended up here:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A democratic republic is a country which is both a republic and a democracy. However, in practice countries which describe themselves as democratic republics do not always hold free or fair elections. One example of this was the German Democratic Republic, a communist state commonly known as East Germany.[1] Others are the former Democratic Republic of Vietnam since 1976 renamed the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Democratic Republic of the Congo which in 2011 was rated by Freedom House as a "not free" country having a rating of 6.0 (1.0 being completely free and 7.0 being completely unfree).

Can you give me a better explanation than Wikipedia? The above explanation doesn't sound too good either.

[Herbert]

This meritocracy manifesto reeks of survival of the fittest. In this case the fittest being specialized intellectuals. It is an arrogant left-brain agenda which will ultimately lead to controlled genetics.
Nowhere does it mention cooperation and sharing for survival of all. An evolved civilization does not need money for happiness. What it needs is a heart.

[cellardoor]

[QUOTE]These ideas are coming from the Bavarian Illuminati and its sub groups. They are the same ones that ran a failed experiment called The Soviet Union, as well as many revolutions in history. They are differant from The Brotherhood, the 13 family's that are running things now that people call the Illuminati. Stalin was funded by the Brotherhood and took over the experiment and began his population reduction programs etc.

So your choice is bad or worse. "There is going to be a New World Order, its just a matter of what kind" -The Bavarian Illuminati. I say neither, I will raise my own children and I will give them my house when I die because they already will be living in it and its none of these peoples business.

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy. I vote we start over with very early American ideals and then base all our laws against govt, making them powerless to do anything but serve us. The only law you really need against the People is, are they over 18, are they damaging anyone property, is anyone being forced against their will? That is the only real measuring stick the law needs. People will find their own way in a truly free society, we dont need to hand over power to some other group that wants to raise your children and "take care of you". We've had enough of that crap and anyway someone new always takes over and the next thing you know the baby's get sacrificed and the govt tics get fat, no thanks.

Because I wasn't sure what democratic republic was I googled it and ended up here:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A democratic republic is a country which is both a republic and a democracy. However, in practice countries which describe themselves as democratic republics do not always hold free or fair elections. One example of this was the German Democratic Republic, a communist state commonly known as East Germany.[1] Others are the former Democratic Republic of Vietnam since 1976 renamed the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Democratic Republic of the Congo which in 2011 was rated by Freedom House as a "not free" country having a rating of 6.0 (1.0 being completely free and 7.0 being completely unfree).




Can you give me a better explanation than Wikipedia? The above explanation doesn't sound too good either.
Another example is the US at the present.

Free market capitalism has demonstrated that the market controls the economic and hence political agenda. Who and what constitutes the market? What is the market's purpose? Who elected any of the participants in the market? What are the political affiliations of these participants? How wealthy are they? In what way do they express the General Will of the People? Is the market designed to operate in the public good? Do our political leaders have any control over the market? Do they know exactly how the market functions and how it contributes (or not) to the public good? Do they know the identities of all the market participants and their respective agendas? Are they able to inform the People exactly what role the market plays? We all know the answer. Our leaders are clueless. They don't control the market; the market controls them.

The market constitutes an unelected, unaccountable, extra-political entity that nevertheless dominates the political space and can bring down presidents, prime ministers and entire national economies. It can provoke global economic crises and yet governments have ZERO control over it. Don't you find that somewhat odd? How can anyone talk of the people being in charge of the political process if the market dictates government policy? Free markets and democracy are INCOMPATIBLE. You cannot have a democracy if you have a market-controlled economy external to the political process and unaccountable to the electorate.

[cellardoor]

This meritocracy manifesto reeks of survival of the fittest. In this case the fittest being specialized intellectuals. It is an arrogant left-brain agenda which will ultimately lead to controlled genetics.
Nowhere does it mention cooperation and sharing for survival of all. An evolved civilization does not need money for happiness. What it needs is a heart.

Not quite, here is their stance on Evolution.


Evolution often seems to proceed by way of abrupt, discontinuous jumps (the punctuated equilibrium theory of evolution) rather than a smooth, gradual process of natural selection. Many fossil records of transitional forms (e.g. between reptiles and mammals) that would be predicted by Darwin's theory have never been found or simply do not exist, while others exist that would not seem to be consistent with Darwin's theory e.g. there are fossils that demonstrate the coexistence of species where it would have been anticipated that one species ought to have preceded the other rather than occurring at the same time. These anomalies might point to the influence of hidden variables as yet unexplored by biological science.

[jp11]

Thanks cellardoor but what I was asking was to give a better explanation of:

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy.

I can see the mess we are in but why would a democratic replublic be any better as Siberia9 has suggested?

[cellardoor]

Thanks cellardoor but what I was asking was to give a better explanation of:

Everyone would do well to remember that the US did very well when it was a Democratic Republic with almost no tax's and plenty of free trade, NOT a Democracy.

I can see the mess we are in but why would a democratic replublic be any better as Siberia9 has suggested?

Unfortunately there is no such thing as a democratic republic it is a farce, just look at Congo. This debate has been raging since the founding fathers. And it seems free market liberty has over ruled public virtue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States

The open question, as Pocock suggested,[26] of the conflict between personal economic interest (grounded in Lockean liberalism) and classical republicanism, troubled Americans. Jefferson and Madison roundly denounced the Federalists for creating a national bank as tending to corruption and monarchism; Alexander Hamilton staunchly defended his program, arguing that national economic strength was necessary for the protection of liberty. Jefferson never relented but by 1815 Madison switched and announced in favor of a national bank, which he set up in 1816.
John Adams often pondered the issue of civic virtue. Writing Mercy Otis Warren in 1776, he agreed with the Greeks and the Romans, that, "Public Virtue cannot exist without private, and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics." Adams insisted, "There must be a positive Passion for the public good, the public Interest, Honor, Power, and Glory, established in the Minds of the People, or there can be no Republican Government, nor any real Liberty. And this public Passion must be Superior to all private Passions. Men must be ready, they must pride themselves, and be happy to sacrifice their private Pleasures, Passions, and Interests, nay their private Friendships and dearest connections, when they Stand in Competition with the Rights of society."[27]
Adams worried that a businessman might have financial interests that conflicted with republican duty; indeed, he was especially suspicious of banks. He decided that history taught that "the Spirit of Commerce ... is incompatible with that purity of Heart, and Greatness of soul which is necessary for a happy Republic." But so much of that spirit of commerce had infected America. In New England, Adams noted, "even the Farmers and Tradesmen are addicted to Commerce." As a result, there was "a great Danger that a Republican Government would be very factious and turbulent there."

[Siberia9]

I meant to say Constitutional Democratic Republic, the point being it has been changed without our consent. This guy explains it very well I think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX-UuOwzsLE&list=FLuHusei_rw59t-kUVVbE4gg&index=21&feature=plpp_video

Also I was told by two differant people who are members of a secret Order that Marx and Lennin were funded by the Bavarian Illuminati, hence my opinion on that. We would be better off with very little govt I think, firemen and librarians and mayors that do as they are told not a bunch of fat ticks that ride around in bullet proof limos.

[cellardoor]

I meant to say Constitutional Democratic Republic, the point being it has been changed without our consent. This guy explains it very well I think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX-UuOwzsLE&list=FLuHusei_rw59t-kUVVbE4gg&index=21&feature=plpp_video

Also I was told by two differant people who are members of a secret Order that Marx and Lennin were funded by the Bavarian Illuminati, hence my opinion on that. We would be better off with very little govt I think, firemen and librarians and mayors that do as they are told not a bunch of fat ticks that ride around in bullet proof limos.

Sounds more like classical Liberalism to me and not much like the constitution:


Classical liberalism is a political ideology that developed in the 19th century in England, Western Europe, and the Americas. It followed earlier forms of liberalism in its commitment to personal freedom and popular government, but differed from earlier forms of liberalism in its commitment to free markets and classical economics.[92] Notable classical liberals in the 19th century include Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. Classical liberalism was revived in the 20th century by Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, and further developed by Milton Friedman, Robert Nozick, Loren Lomasky, and Jan Narveson.[93]
The phrase classical liberalism is also sometimes used to refer to all forms of liberalism before the 20th century.
And, after 1970, the phrase began to be used by Libertarians to describe their belief in the primacy of economic freedom and minimal government. It is sometimes difficult to tell which meaning is intended in a given source.

David Ricardo:
Born in London, England, Ricardo was the third of 17 children of a Sephardic Jewish family of Portuguese origin who had recently relocated from the Dutch Republic. His father was a successful stockbroker.

Thomas Malthus:
"The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction, and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world".
—Malthus T.R. 1798. An essay on the principle of population. Chapter VII, p61[25]

Jean-Baptiste Say:
"supply creates its own demand"

Milton Friedman:
He served as a member of President Reagan's Economic Policy Advisory Board during 1981. During 1988, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the National Medal of Science. He said that he was a libertarian philosophically, but a member of the U.S. Republican Party for the sake of "expediency" ("I am a libertarian with a small 'l' and a Republican with a capital 'R.' And I am a Republican with a capital 'R' on grounds of expediency, not on principle.") But, he said, "I think the term classical liberal is also equally applicable. I don't really care very much what I'm called. I'm much more interested in having people thinking about the ideas, rather than the person."[46]

Robert Nozick:
Nozick presents an argument that illustrates how the minimalist state arises naturally from anarchy and how any expansion of state power past this minimalist threshold is unjustified.

Jan Narveson:
An anarcho-capitalist and contractarian, Narveson's form of libertarian anarchism is deeply influenced by the thought of Robert Nozick and David Gauthier.

[Siberia9]

uh hun, Ok well if we are going to say what it sounds like, then what your into sounds like Communism, you know utopia through socialism. I am not interested in having a govt regardless of its label tell me what job I deserve, take my children away an raise them to be good party members, decide what my salary will be, put in charge of every aspect of my life someone they deem having merit, whatever that is. I need no government to take care of me, its not going to happen, I cant take much more of the one we have now.

Also to compare me to Malthus etc is dishonest and frankly pisses me off, so I am going to step off of this before I get into a dust up here as I am biting my tongue on that one, thats it I'm out.

[cellardoor]

uh hun, Ok well if we are going to say what it sounds like, then what your into sounds like Communism, you know utopia through socialism. I am not interested in having a govt regardless of its label tell me what job I deserve, take my children away an raise them to be good party members, decide what my salary will be, put in charge of every aspect of my life someone they deem having merit, whatever that is. I need no government to take care of me, its not going to happen, I cant take much more of the one we have now.

Also to compare me to Malthus etc is dishonest and frankly pisses me off, so I am going to step off of this before I get into a dust up here as I am biting my tongue on that one, thats it I'm out.

Well I suppose it's the best of socialism and capitalism I am interested in. It's not a case of either or. Both extremes will result in disaster. To compare minimal gov and free market to Malthus and co is logical, because it's exactly what they advocate. To compare Marxism to meritocracy is illogical because it denounces Marx ideologies.

[9eagle9]

And we here at the bottom of the pyramid have the Mediocracy Manifesto.

[Alie]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-7CeMoulbw&feature=g-all-f&context=G2a70037FAAAAAAAATAA

The Meritocracy Movement stems from http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk
The so called Illuminati secret religion.

Blessings

I do not believe this is an organization that we should align with. I studied their website and found so much anger embedded. Because it was recommended by Wes Penre, I emailed him my thoughts. Here's one of his blog posts about his negative communication with them. (http://battleofearth.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/new-boss-same-as-the-old-boss-correspondence-with-the-bavarian-illuminati/)

[jorr lundstrom]

And we here at the bottom of the pyramid have the Mediocracy Manifesto.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yog8qXhQR2U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yog8qXhQR2U

I think its better to get out of the pyramid and let those who want to
play those roll playing games continue doing so inside the structure
they want tp preserve at any cost, even life. LOL

All is well


Jorr

[Hervé]

[...]

Also I was told by two differant people who are members of a secret Order that Marx and Lennin were funded by the Bavarian Illuminati, hence my opinion on that. [...]

For a different source of similar info:

Case 22D Hot Sodas Courtesy of Those Who Funded the Bolshevik Revolution?
(http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?24873-Jacob-Schiff-Ordered-Czar-Nicholas-II-s-Murder&p=260553&viewfull=1#post260553)

[cellardoor]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-7CeMoulbw&feature=g-all-f&context=G2a70037FAAAAAAAATAA

The Meritocracy Movement stems from http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk
The so called Illuminati secret religion.

Blessings

I do not believe this is an organization that we should align with. I studied their website and found so much anger embedded. Because it was recommended by Wes Penre, I emailed him my thoughts. Here's one of his blog posts about his negative communication with them. (http://battleofearth.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/new-boss-same-as-the-old-boss-correspondence-with-the-bavarian-illuminati/)
Their responce

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/The-Satan-Plan%281837991%29.htm

The Vatican is the Illuminati's oldest and deadliest enemy. Its power has faded dramatically in the last couple of centuries, but it is a power nevertheless. The Vatican email address belonged to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith - once known as the Holy Office, or more colourfully, as the Inquisition. What the clipping was designed to demonstrate, we surmised, was that the Inquisition was still monitoring us, still keeping an eye on us, just as it did so assiduously centuries ago. It was simultaneously telling us that it hadn't forgotten about us, and it was also mocking us because if our book (The Armageddon Conspiracy) had proved a serious threat to them, it would have featured in the genuine Vatican newspaper rather than in a fake version.

The Armageddon Conspiracy portrays the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in a distinctly unflattering light, and presents many heretical ideas of the type the Inquisition tried to stamp out. From our point of view, we were pleased that we had provoked the CDF into a response. They watch us and we watch them. Nothing has changed. The ancient struggle goes on.

We wanted to show the CDF that we were contemptuous of their faked response, so we placed it prominently on our website, knowing that the clipping would fool no one who was motivated to check it.

So, the next time another "genius" thinks they have sussed us out and exposed us as frauds, just move along to another website, please. The David Icke website is probably more the sort of thing you're looking for.

[cellardoor]

[...]

Also I was told by two differant people who are members of a secret Order that Marx and Lennin were funded by the Bavarian Illuminati, hence my opinion on that. [...]

For a different source of similar info:

Case 22D Hot Sodas Courtesy of Those Who Funded the Bolshevik Revolution?
(http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?24873-Jacob-Schiff-Ordered-Czar-Nicholas-II-s-Murder&p=260553&viewfull=1#post260553)

Actually there is a myth that Rothschild funded Marx and some people claim that there are checks written to Marx in the British museum, but this is completely false, no such checks exist. Again I should emphasise Karl Marx was not in the Baverian Illuminati, and that Communism was a ridiculous off shoot of Hegelism philosophy, which is brilliant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx

Like Marx, the Young Hegelians were critical of Hegel's metaphysical assumptions, but still adopted his dialectical method in order to criticise established society, politics and religion.
The Rothschilds used foot in the door tactics to over through the Soviet Union, and even gave the final blow to the Russians during Stalingrad. It is preposterous to think that an Old Jewish banking Family had any interest in communism as it was a direct threat to their existence.


Family is the bedrock of the Old World Order. The OWO are a group of dynastic families who have played the family game in the optimal way, and secured permanent power and riches for themselves. Look at the infamous Rothschild family. That family has held vast power for millennia and will do so for millennia to come unless it is stopped. Why should people be allowed to enjoy the finest and easiest of lives simply because their name is "Rothschild." Meritocracy will sweep away all of the dynastic families.

Why do the Illuminati advocate meritocracy? For two simple reasons. 1) It is objectively the best form of government and 2) it destroys the power of the Old World Order.

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/Master-and-Slave(1437970).htm

Under a meritocracy, the absurd inequality that appears under capitalism would be abolished, but so would the sterile and false equality that characterises a system such as communism. Both capitalism and communism are LCD - lowest common denominator - ideologies. In communism, the laziest, most stupid person is guaranteed the same rewards as the hardest-working, most talented person, and hence the talented hard-worker loses any motivation and the system rapidly degenerates. The talented lose all incentive to make optimal use of their skills.

Under capitalism, the production of goods is based on the popularity of those goods, which in turn reflects the quality of the people. A nation full of stupid, untalented people has stupid, untalented tastes. They love popcorn movies, reality TV, game shows, chat shows, sitcoms, hospital, legal and crime dramas and all the rest of the dross that is shown 24/7. A nation of slaves has slave tastes. Everywhere, quality is sacrificed for cheap, gaudy goods with instant appeal. The system is based on short-term gratification and cheap thrills. Everything is disposable. Nothing lasts. In a short time, quality vanishes from capitalism since it simply isn't profitable enough: there are too few people of quality.

Communism and capitalism are both catastrophic. Marx's dialectical analysis was wrong. Communism is not the inevitable victor over capitalism. Communism is the equal and opposite pole of capitalism, and just as bad. Extremes of equality and inequality are equally damaging.
Another point must me made about communism. It is nothing but a secularized form of Christianity. Jesus Christ's "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", is simply a different way of saying Marx's "From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs." The two systems are morally identical. They both revile masters and promote complete equality. Communism is Christianity without Christ, which is why it is so feared by the leaders of the Christian world. It renders them redundant.

Christianity, unlike communism, has historically found favour with the masters, with emperors, kings and dictators. Why? Because it allows them to exploit the slaves as much as they like. "Render unto Caesar," says Christ. That means obey your masters. The communists on the other hand say resist your masters. "Turn the other cheek," says Christ. The communists say, "Better to die on your feet than live on your knees." Christ says that his people will gain their reward in the afterlife. Communists say that there is no afterlife and the reward must come here and now. "Love your enemies," says Christ. The communists say overthrow them, with violent revolution if necessary. Christ tells us to respect private property (the masters' property!) while for the communists all property is theft. At its core, Christianity is ambiguous, a chameleon. Communism is far more honest. No master could ever embrace communism, yet many of the worst masters in history have proudly proclaimed themselves Christian. The Old World Order loves Christianity, one of their greatest instruments of tyranny

The masters spent long decades demonising communism, the ultimate slave ideology. You never heard them breathing a word against capitalism, the most successful master ideology. Instead they demanded, and got, freer and freer markets - less and less regulation and supervision. Cui bono? They didn't want anyone looking over their shoulders to see what they were up to. Their most profitable deals, the ones that carve up the world between them, must be carried out in the greatest of secrecy with no outside scrutiny.

And look what happened? The world was plunged into the greatest celebration of greed and excess in world history. The triumph of the masters seemed complete. They even called themselves the "Master of the Universe." But then came the credit crunch - one of the most calamitous financial disasters of all time. And who paid for the wreckage of the economy? The masters? Don't be absurd. The slaves footed the bill, as they always do.

The dialectic that propels history has already destroyed communism, the slave ideology. Now it will turn its attention to the disaster of capitalism, the master ideology. Slaves will become their own masters and masters their own slaves, and thereby all distinctions between master and slave will be negated.

Meritocracy is the higher synthesis of capitalism (the thesis) and communism (the antithesis). It strips them of their weaknesses and magnifies their strengths. It brings and end to the dark age of master and slave politics and economics. It is the culmination of the dialectic. It marks the overthrow of the Old World Order. It is not just desirable, it is inevitable. It is the End of History in terms of economic and political evolution. There is no stage beyond.

[cellardoor]

The Movement will arise from the creativity of talented people. They will shape it, direct it, make it everything it is. They will solve the problems that confront it. They will make it great. They will make it unstoppable. The Movement is the general will of the people, and nothing is more righteous and more legitimate.

The Old World Order say, just as the "heroes" of Ayn Rand's repellent book Atlas Shrugged did, that they will abandon us to our fate if we do not give them all they demand. They say they will withdraw to some hidden paradise, a valley in the mountains, where they will live as gods. They say we will be unable to cope without their unique "gifts", without their "inspiring" leadership.




We say, Be Gone! Go to your fantasy valley. You are nothing without the people.

We will serve ourselves, not them. We will lead ourselves. We have no need of them. We will share the rewards of our endeavours. We will not line their pockets any longer.



The people are the rightful rulers of this world, not the Power Elite. The people have talent and quality in abundance. It's time for the people to free themselves.


Join the resistance. Join the Movement.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0g9CdxlQOk4&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzoMOAGPGJM&feature=player_embedded

[Prodigal Son]

Great job cellardoor!

I'm not so sure there should be absolutely no inheritance allowed. I think people should be allowed to pass on their homes and such, but there should be caps on it. That would just as effectively wipe out the dynastic families in one generation.

There is also a myth that Rothschild funded Adam Weishaupt, which I believe to be false. It's important to take a hard look at what the ideology is behind a particular revolution in history: Was it to remove tyrannical monarchs, like the American, French and Russian Revolutions? And if so, it's important to keep in mind that the desired outcome may not have been achieved in the short term because of infiltration by the Cabal, but in the long term, things seem to be right on schedule.

2012 - The Beginning of the End of the Age of Materialism!!

[cellardoor]

Some short films by people in the Meritocracy movement.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ogh2UjivjY&context=C4dfc8ccADvjVQa1PpcFNhyglYBUFppx-Ze7AWV3UwZk8b8GvvsH0=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0R3wU9pMuE&context=C43210f1ADvjVQa1PpcFNhyglYBUFppwj_AAIzlsOJ 9HcOntB55bg=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoAIvqP7QO4&context=C43e1cf7ADvjVQa1PpcFNhyglYBUFpp-bzuzCPpHrLNgK-BM9MZxQ=

[Alie]

[QUOTE=cellardoor;460360]Some short films by people in the Meritocracy movement.

Really need to do your homework on this group.

If I'm wrong, I apologize, but for me, I'm not ready to align myself with them.

[cellardoor]

Great job cellardoor!

I'm not so sure there should be absolutely no inheritance allowed. I think people should be allowed to pass on their homes and such, but there should be caps on it. That would just as effectively wipe out the dynastic families in one generation.

There is also a myth that Rothschild funded Adam Weishaupt, which I believe to be false. It's important to take a hard look at what the ideology is behind a particular revolution in history: Was it to remove tyrannical monarchs, like the American, French and Russian Revolutions? And if so, it's important to keep in mind that the desired outcome may not have been achieved in the short term because of infiltration by the Cabal, but in the long term, things seem to be right on schedule.

2012 - The Beginning of the End of the Age of Materialism!!

The great thing about Meritocracy is that it welcomes scrutiny and is constantly in flux so things like 100% inheritance tax can be debated by the most meritorious individuals in those fields. I personally agree with it, the average Joe more often than not spends the last of his wealth on privet healthcare, homes are sold while fat cats offer minimum care standards for that sacrifice. I actually work in a care home here in the UK. So I see the cesspit of corrupted morality every day. I'm doing my best to bring it to the attention of the public at the moment that is all that can be done. Yet the rich people in society are able to pass on their wealth to their interbred airs thus ensuring power is kept within their stupid family unit. The 50% lowest earning people of the UK would not suffer a thing from the tax. In fact such a massive income of common wealth would make most other taxes obsolete. Wealth would be recycled and meritocratically governed.

[Prodigal Son]

[QUOTE=cellardoor;460360]Some short films by people in the Meritocracy movement.

Really need to do your homework on this group.

If I'm wrong, I apologize, but for me, I'm not ready to align myself with them.

You don't have to, nor would they want that. They're a very secretive group. They have to be, otherwise they'd be destroyed instantaneously.

Personally, I have aligned myself with their ideas to overthrow the Power Elite and return the planet to the human race. Can't go wrong with that!

I have resigned myself to the fact that, at least in this lifetime, I will never be "Illuminati", whether they are good or evil. It is nearly impossible to EVER penetrate the inner core of this group. In the end, we're all ONE anyway....

[Alie]

[QUOTE=cellardoor;460360]Some short films by people in the Meritocracy movement.

Really need to do your homework on this group.

If I'm wrong, I apologize, but for me, I'm not ready to align myself with them.

You don't have to, nor would they want that. They're a very secretive group. They have to be, otherwise they'd be destroyed instantaneously.

Personally, I have aligned myself with their ideas to overthrow the Power Elite and return the planet to the human race. Can't go wrong with that!

I have resigned myself to the fact that, at least in this lifetime, I will never be "Illuminati", whether they are good or evil. It is nearly impossible to EVER penetrate the inner core of this group. In the end, we're all ONE anyway....

Well thanks. I certainly understand the concept "meritocracy" and very much agree with the concept -- in fact I have heard the word mentioned by folks I tend to agree with. And when I say align myself with them, I am saying the public view of the group (through their website.) which has not set well with me. That's where my caution is coming from.

[cellardoor]

[QUOTE=cellardoor;460360]Some short films by people in the Meritocracy movement.

Really need to do your homework on this group.

If I'm wrong, I apologize, but for me, I'm not ready to align myself with them.

I have done my home work this an organic Movement of creative individuals who all stem from the AC website. Beyond that nothing is known, Mike Hockney is a ghost writer for the Illuminati, that is how far the rabbit hole goes. My judgements are based on the quality of information that the site provides, and having studied philosophy and psychology I know they know what they are talking about. I highly resonate with the message under extensive scrutiny, but take it or leave it if you wish, I welcome constructive criticism rather than out right dismissal. In the mean time please enjoy another member of the movement Pho the Rapper, there are more of his free tunes on his you tube channel;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a53Qlz4bc_s&feature=related

[cellardoor]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=0Nzj1qFFy30

One of my Favourite songs from Pho

[cellardoor]

An introduction to the Illuminati Religion, form the Armageddon Conspiracy site-How To Become God:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAblg6_-D6E&feature=g-all-lik&context=G27768ffFAAAAAAAACAA