Chinese army on US border with Mexico

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Provided links are not new, but if the US Army stations on some random countries border to protect their investments, why should the Chinese not do the same thing.

Apparently some unknown in the know man/ woman knows why or is just speculating on why the Chinese are there, follow links for further info/ views/insights, blah.( some trucker counted 10.000 vehicles, ten thousend, each fit at least 4/6/8 fully equiped soldiers.

Make of this what you will.


Copied from Kerry's PC.


HOT INTEL : CHINESE TROOPS GATHER ALONG MEXICAN BORDER -- UPDATED!

FOR ALL THOSE WHO DON'T BOTHER TO READ PAST THE OLD LINKS THAT VERIFY THE BUILD UP THE "HOT INTEL" IS FROM A SOURCE AND IS DETAILED IN THE PARAGRAPHS BELOW THE LINKS... This is not rumor or innuendo this is feet on the ground with special access...

A source who is in a position to know sent me the following intel:

..."Here are some links about the Chinese army mobilizing along the US/Mexican border...seems Steve Quayle has been following it as well:

http://thestrongwatchman.com/news-underground/47-news-underground/717-update-on-chinese-troops-in-mexico.html

http://coupmedia.org/terror-threats/chinese-troops-seen-in-mexico-1703

http://conpats.blogspot.mx/2011/03/read-and-decide-for-yourself-chinese.html

FROM SOMEONE ON LOCATION: ..."I am thinking they will wait and see if Obama attacks Iran, or if there is a complete financial collapse -- they will claim they are moving their troops in to protect their investments and properties, and their World Court will most likely back that. They could possibly do this if the mass arrests occur and martial law is declared...the closure of the border could be used for the same excuse, to protect their assets in the US (and getting all that gold back that was hijacked out of WTC 7).

[778 neighbour of some guy]

And for something completely different on this subject, Mexicans, Indians, Chinese sometimes do look alike, just keep reading, its from 2009 as well.

I came across this thread this morning and thought it was some kind of joke, unfortunatly it is not. Quite the contrary it is living proof that both ignorance and stupidity run amuck in ye gintlemen and swell of yonder northern hills.

Apparently, unbeknownst to us mere mortal dumbasses here in Mexico (at least according to many U.S. conspiracy theories found while Googling the subject) we’ve struck some kind of deal with the Chinese Red Army to hook up and tagteam the U.S. to oblivion. When we are done all citizens will be forced to bow before us and prove their loyalty by carrying a taco in one hand and a Chinese wonton in the other. Gee Whiz, some people are just, well, retarded for lack of a better word.

I feel like I just crawled out of a cave because to be honest, until today, I have never heard of these conspiracy theories (or maybe that’s exactly what my government wants), but apparently they have been going on for quite some time.

In 2003, it was reported by John Hopkins that ‘90,000 Chinese Soldiers In Uniform have been found patrolling 20 Miles South Of Tijuana’.

Dennis & Ann Bossack, on January 17, 2003 gave a detailed report on how their lives have been turned upside after revealing the truth about the upcoming Chinese-Mexican invasion.

Dennis Bossack made the following statement in his website http://www.ufolab.info/:

On January 10, 2003, Ann and I posted an article we wrote to our web site. This article is about Chinese troops crossing the US-Mexican border to do maneuvers. The Chinese troops have been encountered by two (2) US Border Patrol agents in the area southeast of Deming, New Mexico.

For more than thirty (30) years, I, Dennis Bossack, have worked spying on the governments of this world and risking my life to find the truth, the cover-ups, the conspiracies and lies perpetrated by governments against the people of this planet.

For the past five (5) years, since going public about my work, Ann and I have been under attack from our government’s subversive agencies. We have had black helicopters land in our backyard in Rhode Island. We have encountered men in black tactical uniforms sporting M-16s in our backyard in Rhode Island. We have been targeted by microwave weapons in Rhode Island. We have found listening devices (bugs) in our house and small business in Rhode Island. We’ve even had a report from the local police department in Rhode Island that a man was stopped leaving our shop in the middle of the night. When approached by the officer, the man produced an ID card from the NSA (National Security Agency).

In Deming, New Mexico, we have been shot at. Black helicopters buzz our house at twenty-five (25) feet. I have been hit by, what we believe to be, the Quantum Potential Weapon. This is a weapon which spreads disease. I had Necrotizing Fasciitis, the flesh-eating bacteria, which landed me on the critical list and six (6) hours from death. It also took my left testicle and one and one-half pounds of tissue from that area of my body.
-Dennis Bossack

I don’t know about you, but I find it a little difficult to believe no-one in Mexico has mentioned the 90,000 Chinese troops hiding out in Baja California on the other hand, I find it pretty credible that the U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY might be landing blackhawk helicopters in back yards and shooting innocent nards with flesh eating Quantum Potential Weapons.

Another conspirator(concerned American citizen)I found on Google had the following open letter posted:

Dear Family and Friends,

Recently some friends of mine, that were visiting in Texas, heard some disturbing rumors. People were supposedly seeing Chinese soldiers in the Mexican desert just south of the border and in
Texas, north of the border.

There was a story about a Texas citizen who decided to go look for
himself, and disappeared. Then I received another story, forwarded to me by another friend. A woman in Texas reported that her relatives had warned her against returning to the family’s ranch
in Mexico.

They told her that foreign soldiers were on and around the ranch. They said that it would not be safe to come in contact with them. When she traveled to Mexico and met with her relatives, the woman learned that the foreign soldiers were Asians, and that they were preparing to attack the United States.

I received another story from a friend who has a website that reports strange events such as these. He had talked to some Border Patrol agents who had seen several detachments of Oriental looking soldiers on maneuvers north of the border, in New Mexico. He said
that the Agents look liked they were “scared to death”.

They supposedly had reported the events to their superiors and had been told to “shut up” about what they had seen, and not to give interviews to any reporters or anyone. They had watched these Oriental troops rendezvous with a detachment of U. S. Marines and have a conversation, and then head back south to the border. What is going on????? These stories have been going on for several years and have been reported by hundreds of people and many websites.

There are further details concerning this story, but I cannot tell it all in this message. You can purchase Gulbransen’s book at the following web site: http://www.thesilentinvasion.com . Gulbransen does not seem to exaggerate in the book, but relates details that are unbelievable. The military experts deny that such an operation could happen under our noses with the satellite technology and intelligence that we have. But I have yet to get a definite answer when I asked the question, “Is it happening?” Most ofthe “American Public” is so “dumbed down” that they laugh at the possibility of such a thing going on in “broad daylight” and “under our noses”. Gulbransen sincerely believes that the Chinese are preparing a “Strike Force” in Mexico.-

I would like to ask anyone with knowledge of anything similar to these findings, about what is going on in Mexico, to please let me know. I have launched an investigation of this matter, and I
have many colleagues in the U. S., Mexico and several Central American Countries already working on this case with me. If anyone has knowledge of strange things happening down on the border, south of the border, or north of the border, please contact me

-J. Davis



To wrap the post up, I’d like to first give my most sincere condolences to Mr.Bossack for the loss of not only his left testicle, but also for the other 1 1/2 pounds of flesh lost from his nether regions in his quest for the truth.

For J. DAVIS, I personally, happen to have a little bit of knowledge, you might not like it, but here goes: The Chinese soldiers roaming around in Mexican military trucks, dressed in Mexican National Army camos and carrying big ass Mexican National Army issued weapons are actually (and by the way, this is classified info, SUPER DUPER TOP SECRET)really authentic MEXICAN soldiers.

OMG! Chinese Soldiers dressed in Mexican military gear found on the U.S.- Mexican border, NOT!

OMG! Chinese Soldiers dressed in Mexican military gear found on the U.S.- Mexican border, NOT!

You see, a funny thing happened many moons ago, long before Colombus discovered America there were groups of people known as Indians. Stay with me, because what I’m going to have to explain next is gonna get a little wordy:

All native American Indians, Central and South American Indians are all ASIAN, anthropologically speaking, and originated from Asia. There are only three racial groups in their pure form 1) Asian (mongoloid) 2) White (Caucasoid) 3) Black (Negroid) and everyone and everybody is usually part of the melting pot of one or many of the three groups.

Once the Spainards came over to colonize they interbred (made babies with) with the natives and many of whom you see in Mexico are a now a type of hybred generation known as mestizos which have maintained many or some of their ancestoral ‘Asian’ features.

There’s really no rocket science to this folks, not all Mexicans are short, dark skinned with black hair and black eyes. We come in a wide variety of colors, shapes and sizes as we’ve got quite a wide variety of genes mixed within us. There’s no conspiracy, just a large, mixed gene pool.

OMG! Chinese Soldiers dressed in Mexican military gear found on the U.S.- Mexican border, NOT!

As for J. Davis and Mr. Bossack , there’s enough wrong with this world without people trying to stir up more ****. Chill out, relax, and for Christ’s sake, lay off the drugs, you crackpots.

[seantimberwolf]

I have a theory on this,
I think they are there to stop people fleeing south, or north when the earth changes get worse.
Think about it, we are all in the same boat globally, if china can spare the troops, which they can maybe they?

[Leon]

mmm, Earth changes? most current Earth changes are caused by man... eg. weather, earthquakes, tsunamies etc etc...

The earth canges are being forced changes.

to prepare for the massacre to come...

[DreamsInDigital]

There are NO chinese troops on our boarders, this has been verified by CIA and military sources, you can contact them your self and ask. The Canadians do not even have treaties with China, if they were really there and they are not! China would be committing an act of war by invasion. You can even check out the supposed base sites on google earth for your self, or contact US Boarder Patrol, they will tell you the same thing, and they aren't hiding it. There is nothing there on those supposed sites.

[Earth Angel]

is that post from Kerry OLD or new?? I am confused.........

[DreamsInDigital]

It's old old mis/disinformation being re-ignited by someone Kerry interviewed, the "story" started by an known shill posting on God Like Productions then went from there. I respect Kerry a lot, but I don't trust hardly anything coming out of her site lately, it's all been either fear based / fear mongering / fear porn, misinformation or extremely out dated. I don't so much think it's Kerry, I think it's either the people she's interviewing or that those of us that are seeing through the information she's allowing her guest to put out have just moved beyond the fear based mind set, and the information doesn't resonate. But, this chinese boarder troops rumors are absolutely false.

[Precog]

Verified by the CIA, Now that is funny. Who would believe a word they say? LOL

[DreamsInDigital]

The source I talked to is reliable and someone I've known a long time, but point being there are many resources anyone can contact on their own and verify that we don't have troops on our boarders and these are just false rumors. But then there is always someone to complain about someone else's sources. Completely ignoring the important content of the information being shared.

[Alie]

The source I talked to is reliable and someone I've known a long time, but point being there are many resources anyone can contact on their own and verify that we don't have troops on our boarders and these are just false rumors. But then there is always someone to complain about someone else's sources. Completely ignoring the important content of the information being shared.

but, but, but, she revised her info .... (just reporting, don't know anything about this)


From Kerry's blog (http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html) (bold added):




A source who is in a position to know sent me the following intel:

"Here are some links about the Chinese army mobilizing along the US/Mexican border...seems Steve Quayle has been following it as well:

My [Kerry's] Note: the links are old but the intel below is NEW!!

http://thestrongwatchman.com/news-underground/47-news-underground/717-update-on-chinese-troops-in-mexico.html

http://coupmedia.org/terror-threats/chinese-troops-seen-in-mexico-1703

http://conpats.blogspot.mx/2011/03/read-and-decide-for-yourself-chinese.html

FROM SOMEONE ON LOCATION: ..."I am thinking they will wait and see if Obama attacks Iran, or if there is a complete financial collapse -- they will claim they are moving their troops in to protect their investments and properties, and their World Court will most likely back that. They could possibly do this if the mass arrests occur and martial law is declared...the closure of the border could be used for the same excuse, to protect their assets in the US (and getting all that gold back that was hijacked out of WTC 7).

My contacts tell me the Chinese are wearing Mexican military uniforms...now, the military is all over the place, troop carriers and tanks rolling down the streets, supposedly as a deterrent to drug gangs...but the army guys wear ski masks supposedly so they will not be identified and their families threatened (many of these soldiers turned and went to work for the Zeta Cartel, so that cartel now has its own army, trained in the US!)...the ski masks hide their nationality..."
-- an undisclosed Source

[Rogerc]

90,000 troops on the border - ultimate paranoia.

What are you people smoking - you'd be smelling flied lice in NYC (instead of Tacos)

If anyone should be paranoid it's us in the great south land with a sneaky buildup of a US Division near Darwin and MSN telling us it's because of a threatened alien invasion.

Ruskies, terrorists, war on drugs,Iran, North korea - good citizens of the USA get a hold on your government before it's too late for all of us.

[DreamsInDigital]

@ Allie:

Personally I don't believe a word of it. There won't be an attack on Iran, not this year. As per multiple sources including Veterans Today (A more reliable source than what Kerry has IMO ) Israel has backed down and decided to revisit the Iran issue after 2013 Israel Elections, ALL the US Battle Groups have been pulled out of the Persian Gulf, this is verifiable by contacting the Navy. The info concerning the chinese troops as has been said is old false rumors. Martial Law will NOT be declared, see that post just further proves my point about what I said above with it all being fear based/fear mongering/fear porn, misinformation or extremely outdated information. The Military just isn't going to stand for any more of the cabal's antics. Even the Oath Keepers site points this out and makes it chrystal clear.

[Alie]

90,000 troops on the border - ultimate paranoia.

What are you people smoking - you'd be smelling flied lice in NYC (instead of Tacos)

now, now, now ... we're thinking out loud, Rogerc

[Rogerc]

90,000 troops on the border - ultimate paranoia.

What are you people smoking - you'd be smelling flied lice in NYC (instead of Tacos)

now, now, now ... we're thinking out loud, Rogerc

Wow Alie that was faster than the speed of light - damn I'm being surveilled

[Alie]

@ Allie:

Personally I don't believe a word of it. There won't be an attack on Iran, not this year. As per multiple sources including Veterans Today (A more reliable source than what Kerry has IMO ) Israel has backed down and decided to revisit the Iran issue after 2013 Israel Elections, ALL the US Battle Groups have been pulled out of the Persian Gulf, this is verifiable by contacting the Navy. The info concerning the chinese troops as has been said is old false rumors. Martial Law will NOT be declared, see that post just further proves my point about what I said above with it all being fear based/fear mongering/fear porn, misinformation or extremely outdated information. The Military just isn't going to stand for any more of the cabal's antics. Even the Oath Keepers site points this out and makes it chrystal clear.

DID
You're a great source of info ... at least I presented it so we could examine different angles.

[Flash]

A few months ago the Chinese troops were supposedly on the Quebec/USA Border: lots of Asians with ttheir military parapharnelia, speaking broken English, forget French, were making their needs god knows where, were fed only won ton cause nobody noticed any food supplier, and they melted in the environment amongst the mostly white, mostly French speaking people cause nobody ever noticed anything around.

And my American friends on this forum, at least some of them, were adamant: I did not know how good at hiding an army the miliitary were, Canadian military of course. I knew nothing. They even argued quite strongly.

Since, I haven't heard of the Chinese army on the Quebec borders.

Now it is Mexico keeping the Chinese army at the American border. Full paranoia isn't it?

This is exactly the kind of news that makes me doubt the entire fringe forums, conspiracy here, quite strongly.

Stupid news come around, and gullible people swallow it.

Then, if there were real world problems were the US is threaten, some stupidities like this would be used to invade Canada and Mexico, with stupid people believing it and justifying the killing of Canadians and Mexicans.

Of all the conspiracies, the PTB, alll of it, this is this kind of stupidity and gullibility present here in this thread that frightens me the most.

Gees, how can anyone believe such news!

Sorry for the rudeness from a Canadian, which is not customary for us, but Gosh, people, use your brain. You need rudeness it seems to wake up.

[Alie]

A few months ago the Chinese troops were supposedly on the Quebec/USA Border: lots of Asians with ttheir military parapharnelia, speaking broken
English, forget French, were making their needs god knows where, were fed only won ton cause nobody noticed any food supplier, and they melted in the environment amongst the mostly white, mostly French speaking people cause nobody ever noticed anything around. And my American friends on this forum, at least some of them, were adamant: I did not know how good at hiding an army the miliitary were, Canadian military of course. I knew nothing. They even argued quite strongly.

Since, I haven't heard of the Chinese army.

Now it is Mexico who keep the Chinese army at the American border. Full paranoia isn't it?

This is exactly the kind of news that make me doubt the entire fringe forums, conspiracy here, quite strongly.

Stupid news come around, and gullible people swallow it. Then, if there were real world problems were the US is threaten, some stupidities like this would be used to invade Canada and Mexico, with stupid people believing it and justifying the killing of Canadians and Mexicans.

Of all the conspiracies, the PTB, alll of it, this is this kind of stupidity and gullibility present here in this thread that frightens me the most.

Gees, how can anyone believe such news!

Sorry for the rudeness from a Canadian, which is not customary for us, but Gosh, people, use your brain. You need rudeness it seems to wake up.


With respect ... it's hard to know what to believe. I think we get an A for Effort in trying to sort it out. The problem IS using our brain. Most of us are attempting to filter, sort, imagine, explore, discard ...

Now a personal story ... there were stories in my town/city that the Chinese were buying an entire shopping center to start a Chinese school ... so I went to the abandoned shopping center --- all the windows were papered, but in each corner was a red Chinese lantern. And tie that into other cities which have already been influenced/bought/??? ... so really ... whether they're here or there or way over-there doesn't matter ....

ION said via James Martinez a few days ago ... "Relax and Allow"

[Flash]

Well I am from Quebec living near the border and there were absolutely no Chinese troops around. If Mexican local tell you the same, the least we can do is believe them. They know their country side and their people like the palm of their hand.

Same for me here in Quebec.

[Alie]

90,000 troops on the border - ultimate paranoia.

What are you people smoking - you'd be smelling flied lice in NYC (instead of Tacos)

now, now, now ... we're thinking out loud, Rogerc

Wow Alie that was faster than the speed of light - damn I'm being surveilled

Ha Ha Ha ... but just happenstance

[Mandala]

The links are a year old. Does that matter to anyone?

[Alie]

The links are a year old. Does that matter to anyone?

Many of us read Kerry's blog as one of our sources of information and many of us share information from all over. So, it could be old, or it could be new. I'm sure that most of us don't mean it to further confuse or mislead.

[Rogerc]

@ Allie:

Personally I don't believe a word of it. There won't be an attack on Iran, not this year. As per multiple sources including Veterans Today (A more reliable source than what Kerry has IMO ) Israel has backed down and decided to revisit the Iran issue after 2013 Israel Elections, ALL the US Battle Groups have been pulled out of the Persian Gulf, this is verifiable by contacting the Navy. The info concerning the chinese troops as has been said is old false rumors. Martial Law will NOT be declared, see that post just further proves my point about what I said above with it all being fear based/fear mongering/fear porn, misinformation or extremely outdated information. The Military just isn't going to stand for any more of the cabal's antics. Even the Oath Keepers site points this out and makes it chrystal clear.

DID
You're a great source of info ... at least I presented it so we could examine different angles.

Do you mean that the US navy is now publishing it's deployments - be the first navy in the world to do so.

Mind you I fervently hope that the US military does not blindly follow - wouldn't that be treason?

[Cartomancer]

Oh No! The Chinese are coming to defend all the Wallmarts. Everyone disperse! The Scoops are on the way! Soylent Green is People! The Chinese are coming to defend what's theirs!

15419

[Rogerc]

:flame:Now a personal story ... there were stories in my town/city that the Chinese were buying an entire shopping center to start a Chinese school ... so I went to the abandoned shopping center --- all the windows were papered, but in each corner was a red Chinese lantern. And tie that into other cities which have already been influenced/bought/??? ... so really ... whether they're here or there or way over-there doesn't matter .... :flame:

Gee and I was worried about McDonalds in Oz and Beijing

[Alie]

:flame:Now a personal story ... there were stories in my town/city that the Chinese were buying an entire shopping center to start a Chinese school ... so I went to the abandoned shopping center --- all the windows were papered, but in each corner was a red Chinese lantern. And tie that into other cities which have already been influenced/bought/??? ... so really ... whether they're here or there or way over-there doesn't matter .... :flame:

Gee and I was worried about McDonalds in Oz and Beijing

Please tell me what you meant ... and offered this story for interesting information.

[DreamsInDigital]

Do you mean that the US navy is now publishing it's deployments - be the first navy in the world to do so.

Mind you I fervently hope that the US military does not blindly follow - wouldn't that be treason?
I was very clear and precisely meant what I said, how else can "verified by contacting the Navy" mean anything other than what it says? Anyone that wants to verify what I said can contact the US Navy and ask them. Where in anyway is it intimated that I meant anything but that? How? I don't understand.

[Rogerc]

Do you mean that the US navy is now publishing it's deployments - be the first navy in the world to do so.

Mind you I fervently hope that the US military does not blindly follow - wouldn't that be treason?
I was very clear and precisely meant what I said, how else can "verified by contacting the Navy" mean anything other than what it says? Anyone that wants to verify what I said can contact the US Navy and ask them. Where in anyway is it intimated that I meant anything but that? How? I don't understand.

Then please give me a contact no. or email - can't find it in the white or yellow pages

[Rogerc]

:flame:Now a personal story ... there were stories in my town/city that the Chinese were buying an entire shopping center to start a Chinese school ... so I went to the abandoned shopping center --- all the windows were papered, but in each corner was a red Chinese lantern. And tie that into other cities which have already been influenced/bought/??? ... so really ... whether they're here or there or way over-there doesn't matter .... :flame:

Gee and I was worried about McDonalds in Oz and Beijing

Please tell me what you meant ... and offered this story for interesting information.

Sorry Alie - put simply as at december 2011 the USA had a trade deficit with China of $295bn, so I'm not surprised that there are red lanterns everywhere

The choice to import from China is yours alone.

Both Bill Clinton and George Bush blamed the undervaluation of the Yuan but perversely stated that increased trade was more likely to convert China to a democracy -

That's obviously costing you dearly.

Conversely Australia has a massive trade surplus with China and there's not much we can do about given our raw materials exports and small population.

I lost the thread of McDonalds but I guess that we have the same problem with US flags popping up like mushrooms.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

There are NO chinese troops on our boarders, this has been verified by CIA and military sources, you can contact them your self and ask. The Canadians do not even have treaties with China, if they were really there and they are not! China would be committing an act of war by invasion. You can even check out the supposed base sites on google earth for your self, or contact US Boarder Patrol, they will tell you the same thing, and they aren't hiding it. There is nothing there on those supposed sites.

Err, thats kinda what the second post ends with if i have read it correct.
No Chinese dudes here, just people who look a lot like them. ( pretty racist thing to say if you ask me, they all look alike)

¤=[Post Update]=¤


is that post from Kerry OLD or new?? I am confused.........

Post is new, links are old, updates from insider are new, and as we all know all insiders are completely reliable, winkwink nudgenudge hubbahubba etc.

Make of this what you will is what i said and feel free to do so.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


Verified by the CIA, Now that is funny. Who would believe a word they say? LOL

Hihihi, correct.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

A few months ago the Chinese troops were supposedly on the Quebec/USA Border: lots of Asians with ttheir military parapharnelia, speaking broken English, forget French, were making their needs god knows where, were fed only won ton cause nobody noticed any food supplier, and they melted in the environment amongst the mostly white, mostly French speaking people cause nobody ever noticed anything around.

And my American friends on this forum, at least some of them, were adamant: I did not know how good at hiding an army the miliitary were, Canadian military of course. I knew nothing. They even argued quite strongly.

Since, I haven't heard of the Chinese army on the Quebec borders.

Now it is Mexico keeping the Chinese army at the American border. Full paranoia isn't it?

This is exactly the kind of news that makes me doubt the entire fringe forums, conspiracy here, quite strongly.

Stupid news come around, and gullible people swallow it.

Then, if there were real world problems were the US is threaten, some stupidities like this would be used to invade Canada and Mexico, with stupid people believing it and justifying the killing of Canadians and Mexicans.

Of all the conspiracies, the PTB, alll of it, this is this kind of stupidity and gullibility present here in this thread that frightens me the most.

Gees, how can anyone believe such news!

Sorry for the rudeness from a Canadian, which is not customary for us, but Gosh, people, use your brain. You need rudeness it seems to wake up.


Now now, take it easy please eh?

This post is no more or no less filled with bullsh1t then 9 out of 10 other posts, its posted as for your information, it comes from Kerry site and if it (probably) is bullsh1t, it is at least updated bs.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


The links are a year old. Does that matter to anyone?

It was the very first thing i said in the top of the post, old updated news.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


Oh No! The Chinese are coming to defend all the Wallmarts. Everyone disperse! The Scoops are on the way! Soylent Green is People! The Chinese are coming to defend what's theirs!

15419

Gehehehe, nice.:p

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Do you mean that the US navy is now publishing it's deployments - be the first navy in the world to do so.

Mind you I fervently hope that the US military does not blindly follow - wouldn't that be treason?
I was very clear and precisely meant what I said, how else can "verified by contacting the Navy" mean anything other than what it says? Anyone that wants to verify what I said can contact the US Navy and ask them. Where in anyway is it intimated that I meant anything but that? How? I don't understand.

Then please give me a contact no. or email - can't find it in the white or yellow pages

Public Inquiry
Desk: 901.874.5800
Fax: 901.874.5813
NAVCO Public Inquiry



NAVY.MIL CONTACT US




For information regarding the items below, visit the following websites:

Joining the U.S. Navy
www.navy.com

Joining the U.S. Navy as a Foreign National (Non-U.S. Citizen)
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=167

Find a Local Navy Recruiter
http://www.navy.com/findarecruiter/

Personnel Information - Career Management, Pay and Leave Information http://www.npc.navy.mil/channels

Locate Someone Currently Serving or Has Served in The Navy
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=168

Board for Correction of Naval Records
http://www.hq.navy.mil/bcnr/bcnr.htm

U. S. Department Of Veterans Affairs
http://www.va.gov/

Post 9/11 GI Bill
http://www.gibill.va.gov/

Acquiring Official Navy Personnel Records And Medals Of Relatives Who Have Served In The Navy:
www.archives.gov/

Medals/Ribbons
https://awards.navy.mil

Naval Heritage And History Command
http://www.history.navy.mil/nhc3.htm

Navy Construction/Buildings
https://portal.navfac.navy.mil/

Navy And Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI)
https://www.homeport.navy.mil/home/

Navy Installations/Bases
https://www.Cnic.Navy.Mil/CNIC_HQ_Site/Supportcenter/Index.Htm

United States Naval Academy
http://www.usna.edu/Admissions/

Navy Exchange Information and Uniform Purchases
https://www.navy-nex.com

Space-A Military Travel
http://spacea.info/

For additional information not covered in the above links, please visit http://www.navy.mil/navydata/faq.asp.



List of Homeports with base phone numbers

Homeports and the Ships Assigned
The following is an alphabetical list of the various homeports. Please note that ships stationed overseas in Italy and Japan are forward deployed in those ports, not homeported there. Within each homeport listing is an alphabetical list of ships and their mailing addresses. Ships which are named for individuals are listed by the first name of that individual. For example, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower is listed under the "D" rather than the "E". Ships that are USNS are those operated with a civilian master and crew by the Military Sealift Command.

Baltimore, MD

USNS Comfort T-AH 20** FPO AE 09566-4008

Bangor, WA

USS Alabama SSBN 731 FPO AP 96698-2108
USS Connecticut SSN 22 FPO AE 09566-2302
USS Henry M. Jackson SSBN 730 FPO AP 96698-2105
USS Jimmy Carter SSN 23 FPO AP 96669-2300
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 FPO AP 96698-2126
USS Louisiana SSBN 743 FPO AA 34091-2144
USS Maine SSBN 741 FPO AA 34092-2138
USS Michigan SSGN 727 FPO AP 96698-2096
USS Nebraska SSBN 739 FPO AA 34092-2132
USS Nevada SSBN 733 FPO AP 96698-2114
USS Ohio SSGN 726 FPO AP 96698-2093
USS Pennsylvania SSBN 735 FPO AP 96628-2121
USS Seawolf SSN 21 FPO AE 09587-2301

Bremerton, Wash.

USS John C. Stennis CVN 74 FPO AP 96615-2874
USS Nimitz CVN 68 FPO AP 96620-2820

Diego Garcia

USS Emory S. Land AS 39 FPO AE 09545-2610

Everett, WA

USS Ford FFG 54 FPO AP 96665-1508
USS Ingraham FFG 61 FPO AP 96668-1515
USS Momsen DDG 92 FPO AP 96672-1307
USS Rodney M. Davis FFG 60 FPO AP 96663-1514
USS Shoup DDG 86 FPO AP 96678-1300

Everett, Wash.

USS Abraham Lincoln CVN 72 FPO AP 96612-2872

Gaeta, Italy

USS Mount Whitney LCC 20 FPO AE 09517-3310

Groton, Conn.

USS Missouri SSN 780
USS New Hampshire SSN 778
USS New Mexico SSN 779

Groton, CT

USS Alexandria SSN 757 FPO AE 09564-2413
USS Dallas SSN 700 FPO AE 09567-2380
USS Hartford SSN 768 FPO AE 09573-2424
USS Miami SSN 755 FPO AE 09578-2411
USS Philadelphia SSN 690 FPO AE 09582-2370
USS Pittsburgh SSN 720 FPO AE 09582-2400
USS Providence SSN 719 FPO AE 09582-2399
USS Springfield SSN 761 FPO AE 09587-2417
USS Toledo SSN 769 FPO AE 09588-2425

Guam

USS Buffalo SSN 715 FPO AP 96661-2395
USS Frank Cable AS 40 FPO AP 96657-2615
USS Houston SSN 713 FPO AP 96667-2393
USS Oklahoma City SSN 723 FPO AE 09581-2403

Kings Bay, GA

USS Alaska SSBN 732 FPO AP 96698-2111
USS Florida SSGN 728 FPO AP 96698-2099
USS Georgia SSGN 729 FPO AP 96698-2102
USS Maryland SSBN 738 FPO AA 34092-2129
USS Rhode Island SSBN 740 FPO AA 34092-2135
USS Tennessee SSBN 734 FPO AA 34093-2117
USS Wyoming SSBN 742 FPO AA 34093-2141

Little Creek, VA

USS Ashland LSD 48 FPO AE 09564-1736
USS Carter Hall LSD 50 FPO AE 09573-1738
USS Fort McHenry LSD 43
USS Gunston Hall LSD 44 FPO AE 09573-1732
USS Hurricane PC 3 FPO AE 09573-1962
USS Oak Hill LSD 51 FPO AE 09573-1739
USS Squall PC 7 FPO AE 09587-1966
USS Thunderbolt PC 12 FPO AE 09588-1971
USS Whidbey Island LSD 41 FPO AE 09591-1729
USS Monsoon PC 4
USS Tempest PC 2

Manama, Bahrain

USS Ardent MCM 12 FPO AE 09564-1932
USS Chinook PC 9 FPO AE 09566-1968
USS Dextrous MCM 13 FPO AE 09567-1933
USS Firebolt PC 10 FPO AE 09569-1969
USS Gladiator MCM 11 FPO AA 34091-1931
USS Scout MCM 8 FPO AA 34093-1928
USS Sirocco PC 6 FPO AE 09587-1965
USS Typhoon PC 5 FPO AE 09588-1964
USS Whirlwind PC 11 FPO AE 09591-1970

Mayport, FL

USS Boone FFG 28 FPO AA 34093-1484
USS Carney DDG 64 FPO AA 34090-1282
USS De Wert FFG 45 FPO AA 34090-1499
USS Farragut DDG 99 34091-1211
USS Gettysburg CG 64 FPO AA 34091-1184
USS Halyburton FFG 40 FPO AA 34091-1495
USS Hue City CG 66 FPO AA 34091-1186
USS John L. Hall FFG 32 FPO AA 34091-1488
USS Klakring FFG 42 FPO AA 34091-1497
USS Philippine Sea CG 58 FPO AA 34091-1178
USS Robert G. Bradley FFG 49 FPO AA 34090-1503
USS Roosevelt DDG 80 FPO AA 34092-1297
USS Samuel B. Roberts FFG 58 FPO AA 34092-1512
USS Simpson FFG 56 FPO AA 34093-1510
USS Stephen W. Groves FFG 29 FPO AA 34091-1485
USS Taylor FFG 50 FPO AA 34093-1504
USS The Sullivans DDG 68 FPO AA 34093-1287
USS Underwood FFG 36 FPO AA 34093-1491
USS Vicksburg CG 69 FPO AA 34093-1189

No homeport

Avalon DSRV 2
Cutthroat LSV 2

No homeport

John Warner SSN-785
Matthew C. Perry T-AKE 9

No homeport

Minnesota SSN 783
Mississippi SSN 782
MV C-Champion
MV C-Commando
MV CAPT Steven L. Bennett T-AK 4296
MV Dolores Chouest
MV HOS Bluewater
MV HOS Greystone
MV VADM K.R. Wheeler T-AG 5001
Mystic DSRV 1
North Dakota SSN 784

No homeport

PCU America LHA6

No homeport

SS Curtiss T-AVB 4
SS PFC Eugene A. Obregon T-AK 3006 FPO AE 09581-7253
SS Wright T-AVB 3
USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez T-AK 3010 FPO AP 96671-7224
USNS 1st Lt. Harry L. Martin T-AK 3015 FPO AE 09578-4061
USNS 1st Lt. Jack Lummus T-AK 3011 FPO AP 96671-7232
USNS 2nd Lt. John P. Bobo T-AK 3008 FPO AE 09565-7254
USNS Alan Shepard T-AKE 3
USNS Amelia Earhart T-AKE 6
USNS Arctic T-AOE 8
USNS Benavidez T-AKR 306

no homeport

USNS Benavidez T-AKR 306

No homeport

USNS Big Horn T-AO 198 FPO AE 09565-4072

no homeport

USNS Bob Hope T-AKR 300

No homeport

USNS Bob Hope T-AKR 300 FPO AE 09573-4042
USNS Bowditch T-AGS 62 FPO AE 09565-4000
USNS Bridge T-AOE 10 FPO AP 96661-3040
USNS Brittin T-AKR 305

no homeport

USNS Brittin T-AKR 305

No homeport

USNS Bruce C. Heezen T-AGS 64
USNS Carl Brashear T-AKE 7

No homeport

USNS Charles Drew T-AKE 10

No homeport

USNS Charlton T-AKR 314

no homeport

USNS Charlton T-AKR 314

No homeport

USNS Cornhusker State T-ACS 6

no homeport

USNS Dahl T-AKR 312

No homeport

USNS Dahl T-AKR 312 FPO AP 96663-4057
USNS Effective T-AGOS 21 FPO AP 96664-4031
USNS Fisher T-AKT 301

no homeport

USNS Fisher T-AKR 301

No homeport

USNS Flickertail State T-ACS 5
USNS Gem State T-ACS 2
USNS Gilliland T-AKR 298 FPO AE 09570-4050

no homeport

USNS Gilliland T-AKR 298

No homeport

USNS Gopher State T-ACS 4 FPO AP 96666-4134
USNS Gordon T-AKR 296 FPO AE 09570-4028

no homeport

USNS Gordon T-AKR 296

No homeport

USNS Grand Canyon State T-ACS 3
USNS Grapple T-ARS 53
USNS Guadalupe T-AO 200 FPO AP 96666-4030
USNS Gunnery Sgt. Fred W. Stockham T-AK 3017
USNS Henry J. Kaiser T-AO 187 FPO AE 09576-4086
USNS Henson T-AGS 63 FPO AE 09573-4054
USNS Impeccable T-AGOS 23
USNS John Ericsson T-AO 194 FPO AP 96664-4071
USNS John Lenthall T-AO 189 FPO AE 09577-4091
USNS John McDonnell T-AGS 51 FPO AE 09578-4013
USNS Kanawha T-AO 196 FPO AE 09576-4075
USNS Keystone State T-ACS 1
USNS Lance Cpl. Roy M. Wheat T-AK 3016
USNS Laramie T-AO 203 FPO AE 09577-4004
USNS Leroy Grumman T-AO 195 FPO AE 09570-4095
USNS Lewis and Clark T-AKE 1
USNS Loyal T-AGOS 22 FPO AE 09577-4018
USNS Maj. Stephen W. Pless T-AK 3007 FPO AE 09582-7209
USNS Mary Sears T-AGS 65
USNS Mendonca T-AKR 303

no homeport

USNS Mendonca T-AKR 303

No homeport

USNS Mercy T-AH 19* FPO AP 96672-4090
USNS Pathfinder T-AGS 60 FPO AE 09582-4026
USNS Patuxent T-AO 201 FPO AE 09582-4012
USNS Pecos T-AO 197 FPO AP 96675-4099
USNS PFC Dewayne T. Williams T-AK 3009 FPO AP 96683-7210
USNS Pililaau T-AKR 304

no homeport

USNS Pililaau T-AKR 304
USNS Pomeroy T-AKR 316

No homeport

USNS Pomeroy T-AKR 316
USNS Rainier T-AOE 7
USNS Rappahannock T-AO 204 FPO AP 96677-4027
USNS Red Cloud T-AKR 313 FPO AP 96677-4082

no homeport

USNS Red Cloud T-AKR 313

No homeport

USNS Richard E. Byrd T-AKE 4
USNS Robert E. Peary T-AKE 5
USNS Sacagawea T-AKE 2
USNS Seay T-AKR 302

no homeport

USNS Seay T-AKR 302

No homeport

USNS Sgt. Matej Kocak T-AK 3005 FPO AE 09576-7248
USNS Sgt. William R. Button T-AK 3012 FPO AP 96661-7262
USNS Shughart T-AKR 295 FPO AE 09587-4015

no homeport

USNS Shughart T-AKR 295
USNS Sisler T-AKR 311

No homeport

USNS Sisler T-AKR 311 FPO AE 09587-4055
USNS Soderman T-AKR 317

no homeport

USNS Soderman T-AKR 317

No homeport

USNS Sumner T-AGS 61 FPO AP 96678-4038
USNS Supply T-AOE 6
USNS Tippecanoe T-AO 199 FPO AP 96679-4040
USNS Victorious T-AGOS 19 FPO AP 96682-4014
USNS Wally Schirra T-AKE 8
USNS Walter S. Diehl T-AO 193 FPO AP 96663-4020

no homeport

USNS Watkins T-AKR 315

No homeport

USNS Watkins T-AKR 315
USNS Watson T-AKR 310 FPO AE 09591-4001

no homeport

USNS Watson T-AKR 310

No homeport

USNS Yano T-AKR 297 FPO AE 09594-4070

no homeport

USNS Yano T-AKR 297

No homeport

USNS Yukon T-AO 202 FPO AP 96686-4068
USNS Zeus T-ARC 7 FPO AE 09595-4076
USS Dewey DDG 105

No homeport

Washington Chambers T-AKE 11

no homeport

MV TSGT John a. Champan T-AK 323

No homeport

William McLean T-AKE 12

No homeport - decommissioned

USS Nashville LPD 13 FPO AE 09579-1715

No homeport - under construction

PCU Zumwalt DDG 1000

No homeport - under construction.

PCU Michael Monsoor DDG 1001

No homeport.

USNS Safeguard T-ARS 50

No homeport.

USNS Salvor T-ARS 52

Norfok, VA

USS New York LPD 21 FPO AE 09579-1721

Norfolk, VA

USS Albany SSN 753 FPO AE 09564-2409
USS Anzio CG 68 FPO AE 09564-1188
USS Arleigh Burke DDG 51 FPO AE 09565-1269
USS Bainbridge DDG 96
USS Barry DDG 52 FPO AE 09565-1270
USS Bataan LHD 5 FPO AE 09565-1657
USS Boise SSN 764 FPO AE 09565-2420
USS Bulkeley DDG 84 FPO AE 09565-1301
USS Carr FFG 52 FPO AE 09566-1506
USS Cole DDG 67 FPO AE 09566-1285
USS Donald Cook DDG 75 FPO AE 09566-1294
USS Elrod FFG 55 FPO AE 09568-1509
USS Enterprise CVN 65 FPO AE 09543-2810
USS Forrest Sherman DDG 98 FPO AE 09569-1214
USS Gonzalez DDG 66 FPO AE 09570-1284
USS Gravely DDG 107
USS Iwo Jima LHD 7 FPO AE 09574-1664
USS James E Williams DDG 95 FPO AE 09578
USS Jason Dunham DDG 109
USS Kauffman FFG 59 FPO AE 09576-1513
USS Kearsarge LHD 3 FPO AE 09534-1662
USS Laboon DDG 58 FPO AE 09577-1276
USS Leyte Gulf CG 55 FPO AE 09570-1175
USS Mahan DDG 72 FPO AE 09578-1292
USS Mason DDG 87 FPO AE 09578-1302
USS McFaul DDG 74 FPO AE 09578-1293
USS Mesa Verde LPD 19 FPO AE 09578-1702
USS Mitscher DDG 57 FPO AE 09578-1275
USS Monterey CG 61 FPO AE 09578-1181
USS Montpelier SSN 765 FPO AE 09578-2421
USS Nassau LHA 4 FPO AE 09557-1615
USS Newport News SSN 750 FPO AE 09579-2406
USS Nicholas FFG 47 FPO AE 09579-1501
USS Nitze DDG 94 FPO AE 09579-1200
USS Norfolk SSN 714 FPO AE 09579-2394
USS Normandy CG 60 FPO AE 09579-1180
USS Oscar Austin DDG 79 FPO AE 09581-1298
USS Ponce LPD 15 FPO AE 09582-1717
USS Porter DDG 78 FPO AE 09582-1296
USS Ramage DDG 61 FPO AE 09586-1279
USS Ross DDG 71 FPO AE 09568-1288
USS San Antonio LPD 17 FPO AE 09587-1700
USS San Jacinto CG 56 FPO AE 09587-1176
USS Scranton SSN 756 FPO AE 09587-2412
USS Stout DDG 55 FPO AE 09587-1273
USS Truxtun DDG 103 FPO AE 09588-6164
USS Vella Gulf CG 72 FPO AE 09590-1192
USS Wasp LHD 1 FPO AE 09556-1660
USS Winston S Churchill DDG 81 FPO AE 09591-1267

Norfolk, Va.

USS California SSN 781
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN 69 FPO AE 09532-2830
USS George H.W. Bush CVN 77 FPO AE 09513-2803
USS Harry S. Truman CVN 75 FPO AE 09524-2875
USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN 71 FPO AE 09599-2871

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

USS City of Corpus Christi SSN 705 FPO AP 96678-2391
USS Hawaii SSN 776
USS North Carolina SSN 777
USS Texas SSN 775 FPO AP 96679-2304

Pearl Harbor, HI

PCU Michael Murphy DDG 112
USS Bremerton SSN 698 FPO AP 96661-2378
USS Chafee DDG 90 FPO AP 96662-1305
USS Charlotte SSN 766 FPO AP 96662-2422
USS Cheyenne SSN 773 FPO AP 96662-2429
USS Chicago SSN 721 FPO AP 96662-2401
USS Chosin CG 65 FPO AP 96662-1185
USS Chung-Hoon DDG 93 FPO AP 96662-1302
USS Columbia SSN 771 FPO AP 96662-2427
USS Columbus SSN 762 FPO AP 96662-2418
USS Crommelin FFG 37 FPO AP 96662-1492
USS Greeneville SSN 772 FPO AP 96666-2428
USS Hopper DDG 70 FPO AP 96667-1289
USS Jacksonville SSN 699 FPO AE 09575-2379
USS Key West SSN 722 FPO AP 96683-2402
USS La Jolla SSN 701 FPO AP 96671-2381
USS Lake Erie CG 70 FPO AP 96671-1190
USS Louisville SSN 724 FPO AP 96671-2404
USS O'kane DDG 77 FPO AP 96674-1295
USS Olympia SSN 717 FPO AP 96674-2397
USS Paul Hamilton DDG 60 FPO AP 96667-1278
USS Port Royal CG 73 FPO AP 96675-1193
USS Reuben James FFG 57 FPO AP 96669-1511
USS Russell DDG 59 FPO AP 96677-1277
USS Santa Fe SSN 763 FPO AP 96678-2419
USS Tucson SSN 770 FPO AP 96679-2426

Portsmouth, N.H.

USS Annapolis SSN 760 FPO AE 09564-2416
USS Helena SSN 725 FPO AP 96667-2405
USS Memphis SSN 691 FPO AE 09578-2371
USS Pasadena SSN 752 FPO AP 96675-2408
USS San Juan SSN 751 FPO AE 09587-2407
USS Virginia SSN 774 FPO AE 09590-2303

Portsmouth, VA

USS West Virginia SSBN 736 FPO AA 34093-2123

San Diego, CA

USS Albuquerque SSN 706 FPO AE 09564-2386
USS Antietam CG 54 FPO AP 96660-1174
USS Asheville SSN 758 FPO AP 96660-2414
USS Benfold DDG 65 FPO AP 96661-1283
USS Bonhomme Richard LHD 6 FPO AP 96617-1656
USS Boxer LHD 4 FPO AP 96661-1663
USS Bunker Hill CG 52 FPO AP 96661-1172
USS Cape St. George CG 71 FPO AE 09566-1191
USS Champion MCM 4 FPO AA 34090-1924
USS Chancellorsville CG 62 FPO AP 96662-1182
USS Chief MCM 14 FPO AA 34090-1934
USS Cleveland LPD 7 FPO AP 96662-1710
USS Comstock LSD 45 FPO AP 96662-1733
USS Curts FFG 38 FPO AP 96662-1493
USS Decatur DDG 73 FPO AP 96663-1290
USS Devastator MCM 6 FPO AA 34090-1926
USS Dubuque LPD 8 FPO AP 96663-1711
USS Gary FFG 51 FPO AP 96666-1505
USS Green Bay LPD 20 FPO, AP 96666-1703
USS Gridley DDG 101
USS Halsey DDG 97 FPO AP 96667-1308
USS Hampton SSN 767 FPO AE 09573-2423
USS Harpers Ferry LSD 49 FPO AP 96667-1737
USS Higgins DDG 76 FPO AP 96667-1291
USS Howard DDG 83 FPO AP 96667-1274
USS Jefferson City SSN 759 FPO AP 96669-2415
USS John Paul Jones DDG 53 FPO AP 96669-1271
USS Juneau LPD 10 FPO AP 96669-1713
USS Kidd DDG 100 FPO AP 96670-1212
USS Lake Champlain CG 57 FPO AP 96671-1177
USS Makin Island LHD 8 FPO, AP 96672-1601
USS McClusky FFG 41 FPO AP 96672-1496
USS Milius DDG 69 FPO AP 96672-1286
USS Mobile Bay CG 53 FPO AP 96672-1173
USS New Orleans LPD 18 FPO AP 96673-1701
USS Ogden LPD 5 FPO AP 96674-1708
USS Pearl Harbor LSD 52 FPO AP 96667-1740
USS Peleliu LHA 5 FPO AP 96624-1620
USS Pinckney DDG 91 FPO AP 96675-1306
USS Pioneer MCM 9 FPO AA 34092-1929
USS Preble DDG 88 FPO AP 96675-1303
USS Princeton CG 59 FPO AP 96675-1179
USS Rentz FFG 46 FPO AP 96677-1500
USS Rushmore LSD 47 FPO AP 96677-1735
USS Sampson DDG 102 FPO AP 96678-1303
USS San Francisco SSN 711 FPO AP 96662-2385
USS Sentry MCM 3 FPO AA 34093-1923
USS Spruance DDG 111
USS Sterett DDG 104 FPO AP 96678-1310
USS Stockdale DDG 106
USS Thach FFG 43 FPO AP 96679-1498
USS Topeka SSN 754 FPO AP 96679-2410
USS Vandegrift FFG 48 FPO AP 96682-1502
USS Warrior MCM 10 FPO AA 34093-1930
USS Wayne E. Meyer DDG 108
USS William P. Lawrence DDG 110

San Diego, CA.

USS Freedom LCS 1

San Diego, CA. (future)

PCU Coronado LCS 4
PCU Fort Worth LCS 3
USS Independence LCS 2

San Diego, Calif.

USS Carl Vinson CVN 70 FPO AE 09566-2840
USS Ronald Reagan CVN 76 FPO AP 96616-2876

Sasebo, Japan

USS Avenger MCM 1 FPO AA 34090-1921
USS Defender MCM 2 FPO AA 34090-1922
USS Denver LPD 9 FPO AP 96663-1712
USS Essex LHD 2 FPO AP 96643-1661
USS Germantown LSD 42 FPO AP 96666-1730
USS Guardian MCM 5 FPO AP 96666-1925
USS Patriot MCM 7 FPO AP 96675-1927
USS Tortuga LSD 46 FPO, AP 96679-1734

under construction

Anchorage LPD 23
Arlington LPD 24
Somerset LPD 25

United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD (USNA)

(YP 676-677, 680-692)
(YP 703-704)

Yokosuka, Japan

USS Blue Ridge LCC 19 FPO AP 96628-3300
USS Cowpens CG 63 FPO AP 96662-1183
USS Curtis Wilbur DDG 54 FPO AP 96683-1272
USS Fitzgerald DDG 62 FPO AP 96665-1280
USS George Washington CVN 73 FPO AE 09550-2873
USS John S McCain DDG 56 FPO AP 96672-1274
USS Lassen DDG 82 FPO AP 96671-1299
USS McCampbell DDG 85 FPO AP 96672-1275
USS Mustin DDG 89 FPO AP 96672-1304
USS Shiloh CG 67 FPO AP 96678-1187
USS Stethem DDG 63 FPO AP 96678-1281

Enjoy

[markpierre]

It's still a fun idea.

[Rogerc]

Thanks for the comprehensive list - could you tell me the whereabouts of the USS Carl Vinson?

It appears that the US Navy is not keen on letting foreign nationals know the position of their battle groups. As for nuclear subs I expect to be visited by men in black over that enquiry.

I'd like you to help me but I fear for your safety because it seems that is classified as treason - certainly Homeland Security would be interested.

Home ports mean nothing - neither do permanent overseas deployments . Are you seriously telling me that the US has no ships in the Gulf or the Straits of Hormuz.

All you have given me are home ports and postal addresses. I was stationed with US troops in Vietnam and I am fully aware of FPO's - perhaps you aren't.

In other words don't be so damned stupid.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Thanks for the comprehensive list - could you tell me the whereabouts of the USS Carl Vinson?

It appears that the US Navy is not keen on letting foreign nationals know the position of their battle groups. As for nuclear subs I expect to be visited by men in black over that enquiry.

I'd like you to help me but I fear for your safety because it seems that is classified as treason - certainly Homeland Security would be interested.

In other words don't be so damned stupid.

Ask them yourself, please and i dont like to be called stupid, ask DiD, i added the numbers for sh1ts and giggles, take a joke please, there is nothing to serious about this thread, as i stated its old updated news and make of this what you will, no need to get personal here.

Regards

665

[markpierre]

Thanks for the comprehensive list - could you tell me the whereabouts of the USS Carl Vinson?

It appears that the US Navy is not keen on letting foreign nationals know the position of their battle groups. As for nuclear subs I expect to be visited by men in black over that enquiry.

I'd like you to help me but I fear for your safety because it seems that is classified as treason - certainly Homeland Security would be interested.

Home ports mean nothing - neither do permanent overseas deployments . Are you seriously telling me that the US has no ships in the Gulf or the Straits of Hormuz.

All you have given me are home ports and postal addresses. I was stationed with US troops in Vietnam and I am fully aware of FPO's - perhaps you aren't.

In other words don't be so damned stupid.

Hey that was a pretty good well reasoned post. Then the last line ripped the integrity out of itself and shredded the whole thing. I really enjoyed that.

[Rogerc]

Thanks for the comprehensive list - could you tell me the whereabouts of the USS Carl Vinson?

It appears that the US Navy is not keen on letting foreign nationals know the position of their battle groups. As for nuclear subs I expect to be visited by men in black over that enquiry.

I'd like you to help me but I fear for your safety because it seems that is classified as treason - certainly Homeland Security would be interested.

In other words don't be so damned stupid.

Ask them yourself, please and i dont like to be called stupid, ask DiD, i added the numbers for sh1ts and giggles, take a joke please, there is nothing to serious about this thread, as i stated its old updated news and make of this what you will, no need to get personal here.

Regards

665

Well 665, I retract stupid, my apologies.

However you were totally adamant that anyone could find the position of a USN warship and that is clearly wrong for obvious reasons.

Regards rogerc

[Rogerc]

Thanks for the comprehensive list - could you tell me the whereabouts of the USS Carl Vinson?

It appears that the US Navy is not keen on letting foreign nationals know the position of their battle groups. As for nuclear subs I expect to be visited by men in black over that enquiry.

I'd like you to help me but I fear for your safety because it seems that is classified as treason - certainly Homeland Security would be interested.

Home ports mean nothing - neither do permanent overseas deployments . Are you seriously telling me that the US has no ships in the Gulf or the Straits of Hormuz.

All you have given me are home ports and postal addresses. I was stationed with US troops in Vietnam and I am fully aware of FPO's - perhaps you aren't.

In other words don't be so damned stupid.

Hey that was a pretty good well reasoned post. Then the last line ripped the integrity out of itself and shredded the whole thing. I really enjoyed that.

Yeh Mark - down scope - that was really unreasonable of me for which I am truly ashamed

[markpierre]

Well don't be ashamed....jeezuz. The apology was sweet and appropriate, but you know your own intentions. You're on it.

[ThePythonicCow]

But then there is always someone to complain about someone else's sources. Completely ignoring the important content of the information being shared.
You don't know where the Navy is deployed.

You don't know whether anyone will attack Iran or not.

You don't know that "Israel has backed down and decided to revisit the Iran issue after 2013 Israel Elections."

You don't know whether or where the Chinese (or anyone else) are or are not massed, outside of your immediate physical surrounds.

You don't have any legitimate CIA or other sources providing you with honest information (though you may well have such a source providing you with a torrent of dis-information.)

You have no clue where to contact the Navy to ask them where they're deployed ... in good part because there is no such place that will provide true information on that.

You've no clue what are all the treaties and agreements that China and Canada might have with each other, so cannot knowingly assert that they don't have a particular one.

You have not contacted the US Border Patrol ... and I doubt they'd tell you, or me, if there were any such amassing of troops.

You don't know what portion of the "information" coming from Kerry's site is valid or not (but you sure can go into a nice rant about how her sources are providing dis-information, then complain if anyone doubts your far more vaguely described, but apparently unimpeachable, sources.)

You don't know that ALL US Battle Groups have been pulled out of the Persian Gulf, and have no way of knowing that. (I suspect the Navy calls them "fleets", not "battle groups", but I'm an old Air Force guy, so don't speak Navy lingo.)

You don't know whether the "military" is going to stand for any more of the "cabal's" tactics.

You don't know what mix of "information" on Kerry's, Veteran's Today or the OathKeeper's sites is valid or not ... but I can pretty much assure you that, like this present forum, it's a mixed bag on all of them.

You've managed to de-rail this thread with your arrogant claims of unimpeachable information. Was that your intention ... or the intention of someone "guiding" you?

Yes ... I question sources ... it is an essential part of discerning good information from misleading dis-information.

You, DreamsInDigital, are on the list of "sources" I question rather highly.

(The above is my personal view; not the considered concensus of the forum mod team.)

===

My purpose is in fostering good discussion on this forum. We all come at this with different and evolving awareness, insight, knowledge, and different and evolving blind spots, ignorance and confusion. Good discussion includes sharing what one has, including some of how one came to that, and listening with at least a touch of humility to what others have, for sometimes they will have something we're ready to hear and learn from.

Spraying a bunch of dis-information, not all related to the thread topic, along with some insults of other sources, then rather arrogantly demanding that others accept all you say, because you have better sources, does not foster good discussion.

Telling someone to go ask the US Navy or Border Patrol themselves, implies they are just being lazy for not having done so already. Such is an insult. If the truthful answer were easily obtainable that way (like say getting the Pythagorean Theorem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) from Wikipedia), then such an insult might be justifiable, if done out of frustration, after the other person has repeatedly refused to do any easy research themselves. But when, as in this case, you're telling them to do something that neither you nor anyone else on this thread has done or could have done ... then it's a gratuitous insult. Such does not foster good discussion either.

[RMorgan]

Hey folks,

Let´s calm down and analyze this scenario.

Well, my hint about this subject is that I don´t see any reason for the Mexican government to allow Chinese troops in their country, specially when such troops might be prepared for an extreme attack operation on the US.

-Mexico is US neighbor. Could you imagine the risks Mexico would be suffering if it allows such thing? The US could crash Mexico with a press of a button.

-The US have started wars for much smaller reasons. If any Chinese troops were detected ( they would certainly be detected) making a massive relocation to anywhere in the West, I guess they wouldn´t even make it to the cost.

-Nowadays, much less significant things go instantly to youtube or similar services. A huge Chinese army regiment would certainly attract a lot of attention and amateur videos would be everywhere by now.

-Also, Chinese people don´t look like Mexican people at all, even if they´re wearing the same uniform.

-The US/Mexico border covers a big desert area. The Chinese would take a long time to cross this area, which is a huge strategic disadvantage.

-The US could send 300 nuclear bombs to blow China out of the map with just a press of a couple of buttons. Anytime.

-The US have the most sophisticated Intelligent Agency in the whole world. If China even thought about making such decision, it would be the end for them.

-Even a 90.000 people army is worthless in US ground. The US could easily blow them up from air.

-How about the necessary structure and logistics necessary to supply such a bug army with their daily needs? Is it possible to cover this up? You need a huge area, lots of food, lots of shelters, lots of water, lots of everything...

Well, I could go on here forever...

Cheers,

Raf.

[Strat]

Let´s calm down and analyze this scenario.


God bless you RMorgan.

I can't add too much more to this thread other than I imagine finding out where US ships are stationed in the US is not difficult. I live near a large Naval base and when friends/loved ones are away everyone knows when they're coming back. Also it is common knowledge around here that the local base is getting bigger in order to accommodate a nuclear-powered air craft carrier.

It will also be in the paper/news when a ship is here and they give tours. That is fun!

I do not think you can find out where they are going once they leave the base. Frankly nobody outside Navy Intel should be allowed this info.

[EnergyGardener]

But then there is always someone to complain about someone else's sources. Completely ignoring the important content of the information being shared.

You, DreamsInDigital, are on the list of "sources" I question rather highly.

(The above is my personal view; not the considered concensus of the forum mod team.)

Paul, Since you are not speaking as a moderator, but as an old Air Force person, let me say: We all are entitled to our opinions.

Mine is that you handled this as if you know DID is wrong. Mine is that disinformation purporting that Drake's reporting and preparations with the US Marshal / Local Police / Pentagon campaign is actually the Trojan Horse that will be coordinated with Chinese soldiers invading from the North and South to kill us all, is to be expected. But that disinformation, if known, must be clearly revealed to prevent dilution of Drake's message and effect. Receiving the confirmation by DID's multiple verified sources—that the Chinese troops massing is untrue—is extremely important to know right now. Her information was very important for on this important subject, as are others she has shared.

Perhaps a PM to DID before posting this to discuss her sources and confidence or her position might have tempered your remarks. I'm guessing that did not happen?

My opinion is that your response to DID is very rude and that DID is deserving an apology from you to say the least.

[Rogerc]

Good one Raf,

Thing that troubles me is that does US Intelligence feed the US govt what it really knows?

Saddam's WMD's

And really scary the alien invasion threat aired on a major Australian network.

Seems that the US military/Govt think we have to be scared of something and judging by the number of "aliens" on theses threads they might have picked a better one than the "terrorist threat" or the "war on drugs" this time

[Flash]

Let´s calm down and analyze this scenario.


God bless you RMorgan.

I can't add too much more to this thread other than I imagine finding out where US ships are stationed in the US is not difficult. I live near a large Naval base and when friends/loved ones are away everyone knows when they're coming back. Also it is common knowledge around here that the local base is getting bigger in order to accommodate a nuclear-powered air craft carrier.

It will also be in the paper/news when a ship is here and they give tours. That is fun!

I do not think you can find out where they are going once they leave the base. Frankly nobody outside Navy Intel should be allowed this info.


you know, because you live in the neighbourhood, when a ship is coming back or that a nuclear carrier will be accomodated there and some people in this forum argue that local (me in Quebec or a Mexican on his border) would not know that Chinese troops are around..... wow, let me laugh to the silliness.

[Flash]

The links are a year old. Does that matter to anyone?

iit does not matter when it is used to convince people that whatever in north or soulth is foreign and would host enemies of the great paranoid on the border of being fasicist US of A. With sudh thinkint, the nest step is to kill everyone north and south and steal the land , with no remorse whatsoever cause they wanted to kill us. This looks like a build up similar to the Irak story,

Real american geinus, thinking of attacking always based on false stories believed by gullible army meat for canon to be.

Don't I dislike this kind of American fascist thiking mindset of their rednecks.

[Strat]

If you want to launch a master plan to invade the US, probably the worst thing you could do is place your troops near Texas. You know how many guns are in that state? Never mind the Army base, the citizens are ready to go. Hell, where do you think Alex Jones has been reporting from all this time?

This is a joke, nobody get upset please

And I have a nagging suspicion someone is drunk posting

[Flash]

Yes you are right about Texas.

I can imagine poor 30 millions Canadians for whom arms are forbidden trying to invade USA with is 250 millions inhabitants fully armed....
<
When I think of it, we would really need the Chinese to chip in then... cause us alone we don't stand a chance hum.... when I think of it... Who had this idea?:confused:;)

[ThePythonicCow]

From Kerry's blog (http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html) (bold added):




A source who is in a position to know sent me the following intel:

"Here are some links about the Chinese army mobilizing along the US/Mexican border...seems Steve Quayle has been following it as well:

My [Kerry's] Note: the links are old but the intel below is NEW!!

http://thestrongwatchman.com/news-underground/47-news-underground/717-update-on-chinese-troops-in-mexico.html

http://coupmedia.org/terror-threats/chinese-troops-seen-in-mexico-1703

http://conpats.blogspot.mx/2011/03/read-and-decide-for-yourself-chinese.html

FROM SOMEONE ON LOCATION: ..."I am thinking they will wait and see if Obama attacks Iran, or if there is a complete financial collapse -- they will claim they are moving their troops in to protect their investments and properties, and their World Court will most likely back that. They could possibly do this if the mass arrests occur and martial law is declared...the closure of the border could be used for the same excuse, to protect their assets in the US (and getting all that gold back that was hijacked out of WTC 7).

My contacts tell me the Chinese are wearing Mexican military uniforms...now, the military is all over the place, troop carriers and tanks rolling down the streets, supposedly as a deterrent to drug gangs...but the army guys wear ski masks supposedly so they will not be identified and their families threatened (many of these soldiers turned and went to work for the Zeta Cartel, so that cartel now has its own army, trained in the US!)...the ski masks hide their nationality..."
-- an undisclosed Source



Everything on the links, even the "updated" portions, is dated on or before May 2011, almost a year ago.

The "NEW" portion is in the quote "FROM SOMEONE ON LOCATION"


The links are a year old. Does that matter to anyone?

Yes, the links point to old material. The new stuff is in the quote "FROM SOMEONE ON LOCATION".

[CdnSirian]

Aside from all the above, I remember reading an article on line a few years ago, which stated that Clinton (while President) had signed a Trade Treaty with China that included the clause that they could enter the US to protect their "investments" at any time, if they felt that their interests were threatened.. whatever that means. Thanks Bill!

I cannot remember where I read that, but if I can find it, I will post here.

[jcocks]

My gut tells me that, if the Chinese invade, it'll be to ensure that the new financial system that is in the works is allowed to come online without American interference. They won't be worried about the average joe citizen, they'll be more concerned with America's corrupt government.


And tying Iran into all this is silly, Iran doesn't strike me as the type to attack anyone except in self-defence. They'll be more interested in helping usher in a new era of world peace. They have no need of an empire.

The problem with all of this is that there are plenty of Americans who will accept what their government says and take up arms against whoever their government tells them to, because they still haven't cottoned on to who their real enemy actually is! :(

[EnergyGardener]

My gut tells me that, if the Chinese invade, it'll be to ensure that the new financial system that is in the works is allowed to come online without American interference. They won't be worried about the average joe citizen, they'll be more concerned with America's corrupt government.


And tying Iran into all this is silly, Iran doesn't strike me as the type to attack anyone except in self-defence. They'll be more interested in helping usher in a new era of world peace. They have no need of an empire.

The problem with all of this is that there are plenty of Americans who will accept what their government says and take up arms against whoever their government tells them to, because they still haven't cottoned on to who their real enemy actually is! :(

I could not disagree more and the same is true for the rest of America. While asleep sheep perhaps at the moment—once awakened— we/ they will accept nothing less than a free America in every regard. Within a few years, nationality will be relevant for tourism only, we will be brothers and sisters in our new world with little distinguishable and no need for government, money and military.

I believe that it is quite possible there might remain foreign troops in the US and here for no good reason to US citizens. I believe it is possible there perhaps were Chinese troops in Mexico, and even, perhaps Canada. For reasons recently stated in the Drake thread, it's all moot now, and I believe, based upon DID's and Drake's sources, nobody will mess with the US citizens, or any other human being from here on out.

[schneider]

i wonder if kerry's source on the chinese army in mexico is none other than jim stone, who fled to mexico to avoid being arrested. if it is him, i wouldn't believe the report. according to a member of this forum, he is a complete imposter.

[Airwooz]

I know Chinese army are very busy in hailing to the Party chief this time , not just army also navy and strategic missile division, cause the aborted coup attempted...........the whole military are corrupted to the core, they got their own business to worry about...they only has little ability to start conflicts against Vietnam or Philippines Not USA........