The beginning of the arrests?

[Forevernyt]

Not that I'm buying into anything at this point, but could this be just the beginning of the forthcoming wide spread arrests?

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/30/business/hong-kong-tycoon-arrest-explainer

[crosby]

this is interesting. thanks Forevernyt. it will be interesting to see what comes next.
regards, corson

[aranuk]

Long may it all continue peeps.

Stan

[TargeT]

Not that I'm buying into anything at this point, but could this be just the beginning of the forthcoming wide spread arrests?

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/30/business/hong-kong-tycoon-arrest-explainer


"I thought (the arrest) is probably a follow-on from the family split in 2008 ... it's notable that Walter has not been arrested," said Webb. According to court documents filed in 2008 during the family's legal battle, Walter Kwok questioned contracts awarded "to a select number of contractors," as well as a land deal in the city's New Territories.



sounds like greed and family infighting, the other thread (massive) that's been building in page count for a while is mostly full of resignations ( http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?41059-Massive-Bank-and-High-Profile-Resignations-Across-the-World ); I don't know, you'd think if this "mass arrest" were to actually happen it would happen,, well, "en masse" ?

[PathWalker]

Not that I'm buying into anything at this point, but could this be just the beginning of the forthcoming wide spread arrests?

Not yet, I do not feel like it.
It will probably happen at the weekend when the markets are close. Or Monday morning when the people just get to work.
Yet I am little believer in mass-arrests/coup. I do not believe in one control system replacing the other. That is what happening now.

[peace]

The difference is those who were arrested, those who are being arrested and those who are going to be arrested -- that’s the second layer of the onion, in other words...

DW: This is why we’re not seeing a lot of newspaper and website articles about this.

There’s no accountability of these people getting arrested in the outside world, because they don’t have a public position.

DK: Well, not only that, but the mainstream media’s controlled by them.

DW: Exactly.

DK: Therefore, you’re not going to hear this.
------------
don't believe this guy. i've gotten in trouble for being critical of him, but geez, he is too much. i don't care if i get banned. he plays victim and he makes crap up and any sliver of truth he can wrap around a lie, he will. it makes me sick.

[TargeT]

The difference is those who were arrested, those who are being arrested and those who are going to be arrested -- that’s the second layer of the onion, in other words...

DW: This is why we’re not seeing a lot of newspaper and website articles about this.

There’s no accountability of these people getting arrested in the outside world, because they don’t have a public position.

DK: Well, not only that, but the mainstream media’s controlled by them.

DW: Exactly.

DK: Therefore, you’re not going to hear this.
------------
don't believe this guy. i've gotten in trouble for being critical of him, but geez, he is too much. i don't care if i get banned. he plays victim and he makes crap up and any sliver of truth he can wrap around a lie, he will. it makes me sick.

Willcock and Fulford are ridiculous to me, don't worry about "banning" it won't happen because of you disagreeing with those clowns; I agree with your observations & wilcock just rubs me the WRONG way (and since this is a "feeling" I have I don't vocalize my criticism too much, it may be flawed, but logic works against willford and fulcock as well....)

[Carmody]

You'll never get banned for disagreeing, you'll get banned for not being respectful or polite.

And in this thread I see disrespect and and impoliteness.

The kind that is so small minded and sad that it ventures into name tossing and insults.

Which is very immature, to say the least.

Thus you incite people with/to riot and they have to 'bash it out' with you..... and then you tie up the forum through not expressing yourself like an adult.

And THAT is what leads to being banned. The forum is about reasoned debate, not insults.

To take the sting out of that, I'll say I'm not perfect and I spent years fighting those fights and I did indeed ...finally stop.

[TargeT]

You'll never get banned for disagreeing, you'll get banned for not being respectful or polite.

And in this thread I see disrespect and and impoliteness.

The kind that is so small minded and sad that it ventures into name tossing and insults.

Which is very immature, to say the least.

Thus you incite people with/to riot and they have to 'bash it out' with you..... and then you tie up the forum through not expressing yourself like an adult.

And THAT is what leads to being banned. The forum is about reasoned debate, not insults.

To take the sting out of that, I'll say I'm not perfect and I spent years fighting those fights and I did indeed ...finally stop.

interesting take, I completely disagree.

there's hardly even "strong language" in this thread; I don't see any name tossing or insults, perhaps a little labeling (by myself). If this is what you see as inciting people to riot I think you need to get out more, your wording (in light of the content of this thread) is highly reactive and indicitive of a strongly held belief defense.

tsk tsk carmody, this post is out of charactor for you.

[humanalien]

Willcock and Fulford are ridiculous to me, don't worry about "banning" it won't happen because of you disagreeing with those clowns; I agree with your observations & wilcock just rubs me the WRONG way (and since this is a "feeling" I have I don't vocalize my criticism too much, it may be flawed, but logic works against willford and fulcock as well....)

Your better off keeping your bad comments to yourself.
I just recently got banned for 3 days because i said the
same stuff about DW.

[TargeT]

I feel that people who say entertaining things are clowns (and rather funny ones at times), I am not attempting to be rude nor saying these things out of mallace; if I cannot express my opinion that people who tell us to "wait for someone else" to save us are ridiculous & very likely damaging "us" through encouraging inaction; then I will find another place to contribute (or do I ?) to.

[PHARAOH]

Won't be real to me, till it happens in my back yard. Hope your right though....

[pilotsimone]

deleted post

[pilotsimone]

I really try to keep this in mind when I'm speaking or posting. Maybe others will find it useful...


If it is not truthful and not helpful, don't say it.
If it is truthful and not helpful, don't say it.
If it is not truthful and helpful, don't say it.
If it is truthful and helpful, wait for the right time.

~Buddha

[foreverfan]

I'll believe it when Sabrina posts it. But remember, you still have this problem.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElrXrE8AmIc&feature=related