PDA

View Full Version : Finally Rand Paul Answers Hard Questions - Revolution Continues!



ExomatrixTV
13th June 2012, 09:43
rQ-fz_mJXNU

~sub: http://youtube.com/RonPaulRevolt2012

~credits video: http://youtube.com/realjoeplummer Senator Rand Paul joins Daily Paul Radio with Kurt Wallace for 'Rand Paul Answers; The Daily Paul Interview' to discuss his endorsement of Mitt Romney and to answers the questions submitted by The Daily Paul community.

http://ronpaul.com/2012-06-12/rand-paul-on-the-peter-schiff-show/

HELP TO MAKE THIS VIDEO VIRAL by voting Thumbs Up as a support for this video (not for Rand) but for Peoples Media. I know it is tempting to use your anger towards Rand on the "dislike" button, but see it as a supporting the Truth to come out! Even things we do not like, we do not need a "sugar coated" reporting from Mass Mainstream Media with all those spindoctors twisting hard-truth into a mellow version for the NWO sheeple! We CAN outsmart Defeatism. Perception Wars is part of the Revolution.

Rand Paul appeared on the Peter Schiff Show today to explain why he endorsed Mitt Romney, how he came to respect many of his fellow senators even though he doesn't agree with them on all the issues, and what he is doing to advance the cause of liberty.

~original video statement: License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)

Appendix to Ron Paul's book, 'Liberty Defined':

01. Rights belong to individuals, not groups; they derive from our nature and can neither be granted nor taken away by government.

02. All peaceful, voluntary economic and social associations are permitted; consent is the basis of the social and economic order.

03. Justly acquired property is privately owned by individuals and voluntary groups, and this ownership cannot be arbitrarily voided by governments.

04. Government may not redistribute private wealth or grant special privileges to any individual or group.

05. Individuals are responsible for their own actions; government cannot and should not protect us from ourselves.

06. Government may not claim the monopoly over a people's money and governments must never engage in official counterfeiting, even in the name of macroeconomic stability.

07. Aggressive wars, even when called preventative, and even when they pertain only to trade relations, are forbidden.

08. Jury nullification, that is, the right of jurors to judge the law as well as the facts, is a right of the people and the courtroom norm.

09. All forms of involuntary servitude are prohibited, not only slavery but also conscription, forced association, and forced welfare distribution.

10. Government must obey the law that it expects other people to obey and thereby must never use force to mold behavior, manipulate social outcomes, manage the economy, or tell other countries how to behave.

~Ron Paul The Movie! Full Version HD:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=crq0FxRmSnI

~MSM Fears Ron Paul Revolution 2012 HD:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BDJSAyI53_M

This video is [FAIR USE] under © COPYRIGHT LAW it is: ➀ noncommercial ➁ trans-formative in nature ➂ not competitive with the original work ➃ not effecting its market negatively

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes
MSM = Mainstream Media

~subscribe Ron Paul R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution Network:

~RonPaul: http://goo.gl/LHUVe
~OathKeepersOK: http://goo.gl/iozZO
~SenatorRandPaul: http://goo.gl/clxX1
~TheRevolutionPAC: http://goo.gl/5pzx0
~RonPaulFriends2: http://goo.gl/kDMlV
~VoteRonPaul12: http://goo.gl/PuUy9
~Girls4RonPaul: http://goo.gl/9gZdU
~CongressmanRonPaul: http://goo.gl/8nvwX

☑ First they ignore you (Pre-2007).
☑ Then they laugh at you (2007-2008).
☑ Then they fight you (2008-2011).
☐ Then you win (2012-?) with YOUR help!

Join the rEVOLution, Ron Paul 2012.

markpierre
13th June 2012, 11:27
I appreciate this post Exo, it really confirmed something for me.
It seems important to me to believe that if the 'system' can't be overtly changed, it can potentially be converted, and it seems almost
irresponsible to me for someone in Rands position to allow himself to be relegated to 'outside' the system and have no influence,
just out of 'principle'. What is it that needs to be achieved?
The external pressure for change 'fathered' by Ron, won't go away. That's how it is from this point on.

If it occurs by revolution or violent confrontation, then so be it, but I think any sane thinking individual on either side would choose that not occur.
I'm going to leave 'the evil plan for global depopulation' idea aside for now. I don't expect the worst. I expect a solution, whatever it looks like.

But I also appreciate the values expressed regarding working with consideration for the individuals across the parties.
My own experience in a short time in industry was an example to me, where I was placed in a situation to appear to have 'earned' authority,
by virtue (in my observation) of the fact that I cared about my superiors as people as much as I cared about the people i was responsible for.
I had absolutely no knowledge of, or interest in the business. So it had to be some other quality.

The easiest way to make someone feel respected and cared about, is to actually respect and care about them.
You can't distinguish necessarily the incorrigible from the simply ignorant or self absorbed. Some of those, and who knows how many,
can be reached.

We did good work. Management followed old structures out of habit and ignorance, not out of an evil predisposition to dominate and control.
though it certainly looked that way from the bottom.
But I sat in management meetings and merely pointed out simple integrity issues that don't occur to minds habituated to balancing numbers.
Or minds conditioned to keeping the status quo? Or peer pressure?
For no reason other than I wouldn't know another way, but neither did they. They hadn't considered another way.

Things changed, production and inter-department cooperation went way up, and everyone was appreciated and monetarily rewarded,
including the 'bosses', without demonizing them.
If your peers are thoughtful caring people, you begin to think that way with them. It's enjoyable to do that.

That can work on any scale, on any level. The 'New World Order" is passe, its time has come and gone. More devoted caring liberty minded
people taking offices on any level in the 'land of the entitled, home of apathy' will make a difference, and support better thinkers in higher places.
Lets cooperate to get them in those places.

I don't want to lose trust, other than where my trust was misplaced in the first place. But eventually it will have to come back to faith and trust.
It was me that stopped paying attention and neglected to place my own values on the table that allowed this situation.

I can change that.

Fred Steeves
13th June 2012, 11:59
This is exactly what I felt like sitting here listening to the good senator.

XrbumvF-Oe4

Maia Gabrial
13th June 2012, 20:39
I'm seeing fear in his eyes. It may very well be for his father who has a hit out on him.

SilentFeathers
13th June 2012, 20:44
It doesn't take long for these politicians to be assimilated....and become Borg! :)

Resistance is futile!

sigma6
14th June 2012, 04:15
I haven't even looked at the video yet, and I'm gonna say it's all rehearsed, why else did he have to take so long to say anything...? and when I do watch it, I will be taking a good long hard look at that face and prose, I will want to remember it I'm sure...

markpierre
14th June 2012, 09:39
You guys might try to remember how dependent you are on the scenario as it's been described to you.
Dependent for what? Why?
Sure in that scenario there have been death threats, and the lives of families are at stake. Imagine the immensity of decisions made.
Are you addicted to that picture?
You're being asked from a lot of directions to participate in the solution. How do you do that? Clean your gun?
I don't know how to kill a demon, except to just kill it.
Kill it where it is. In my fear of it.

It doesn't matter. I'm not hanging around a world that has to battle to the death with it's fear. I just refuse. I don't care what happens,
I'm home in a moment in bod or without. It's a state of mind you bozos. Where and how do you begin to see it in a story?
Change the story. Try it. Leave the gun at home. It's in your mind. You're the author. Don't try to play both love and fear at the same time.
Pick one and live with it.

The morbid truth is that I'd love to see America collapse in ruin on a computer screen in Australia. That's weird.
Another Star Wars saga.
That's a big worry. Seems sociopathic to me, and a big responsibility to change things how they can be changed.
I reject that story and my perverse addiction to it.

Consider how you're intending to combine the viewpoint of raising the vibration, and the viewpoint of taking back what you never knew was stolen until a moment ago.
Because you can't have both, if what you think was taken and who took it is where your attention remains.
Paint a different picture to obsess on. Include a few of the values that you appreciate, and begin to see it.
You won't see it until you allow what you're seeing now to dissolve into it.

foreverfan
16th June 2012, 00:28
That's it... Back to my normal life. :ohwell:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swIZ1ascGCA

More Psycho Dad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T80uT27z9BI&feature=player_embedded#!)