View Full Version : John Kettler - UFO Daylight Landing At Chicago’s O’Hare Airport–Breaking!
StarDust
15th June 2012, 03:07
http://johnkettler.com/ufo-lands-in-broad-daylight-at-chicagos-ohare-airport-breaking/
UFO Daylight Landing At Chicago’s O’Hare Airport–Breaking!
BY JOHN KETTLER ON JUNE 14, 2012
UFO landings simply don’t happen in airspace tightly controlled by post 9/11 regulations, but that didn’t stop a green-glowing UFO from doing just that last Thursday afternoon. As it sat there motionless on the ground for hours, it naturally attracted the attention of the authorities. When the UFO was found to be emitting heat, ionizing radiation was suspected, bringing Homeland Security rushing to the scene, including nuclear technicians in lead-lined protective suits and carrying Geiger counters, plus heavily armed agents of the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission). No ionizing radiation was found. The UFO was under continuous surveillance , with no one observed either entering or leaving, before it was “gift wrapped” and loaded for a long ride on a Diamond T towed lowboy trailer, in a convoy with no less than eight NRC cars. Before It’s News broke the story, with some amazing pictures (source unknown) of the UFO convoy pulled off the road and cordoned by security. What the site doesn’t say is that the curious at the I-57 truck stop soon found themselves looking at the wrong ends of Mini Uzis and H&K MP5Ks! These appeared, as if by magic, from under the jackets of the NRC agents.
UFO, Where DID You Go?
The O’Hare UFO went on a long trip, watched and reported on by many, something believed unique in the annals of UFO retrievals, ever wending its way to the Nevada Test Site, specifically Area 51′s S4. There, the “fun” began in earnest. Initial reports indicated the UFO was teardrop shaped, leading the ETs/EDs (extraterrestrials/ extradimensionals) of the Liberation Forces to think it was an unarmed Reptoid scout craft, probably there to evacuate some important Reptoid personage disguised as a human. Later insider reports indicated, though, that it was similar to Bob Lazar’s “Sport Model.” Inquiries from the ETs/EDs regarding markings revealed them to consist of an inverted “V” sitting on a rocker, with a set on both sides of the UFO. According to the ETs/EDs, these were Reptoid marking of the Bak’hla or Mak’hla Clan, one of the main clans here on Earth, and associated with the Freemasons! This put matters in an entirely new light, for opening the craft could present any number of scenarios, ranging from annoying to devastating. Multiple advice, both terrestrial and from the ETs/EDs, was passed along, ranging from biohazard issues, to military matters of an extreme nature (Reptoids average 9-12′ tall, weigh 500-700+ lbs, and have the strength of 6-12 men) and special issues, such as the need to prevent the personnel opening the UFO from being psionically taken over. But first, they had to get into it.
UFOs Don’t Come With Keys!
There are three main ways to get into a sealed UFO: running a gloved hand down both sides of the craft’s fuselage (to trigger a pressure panel), using a special tone generator, rather like a garage door opener, or a frequency sweep generator. When these failed, brute force methods reportedly came into play. Microscopic examination of the hull eventually located the hairline which indicated where the UFO’s hatch was. From there, it was hard, hard work to drive a wedge in far enough to spring the hatch. When it popped open, a very hot reception was waiting for any occupants, but the craft was empty and had the same tiny seats Bob Lazar reported seeing on the craft he worked on. Not much fun for a big Reptoid or even a human! The craft was subjected to a thorough search for bombs and booby traps of every sort, with none found, and underwent comprehensive decontamination procedures as well. According to sensitive insider reports, the craft was powered by the same sort of reactor Bob Lazar described encountering on the Sport Model. An “island of stability” element, such as 115, when placed in the UFO’s reactor, generated electric power for ship’s systems and antigravity propulsion. The ETs/EDs were surprised at the nature of the craft, given the Reptoids use fission, but said it could’ve been seized on a conquered planet or built from captured plans. In any event, no vessel of the Liberation Forces was missing! The last word on the Reptoid UFO was that it was going to be dismantled for reverse engineering of its technology.
http://johnkettler.com/wp-content/uploads/OHareUFO.jpg
UFO From O'Hare Image Credit: Unknown
TMfP1J6657o
DarMar
15th June 2012, 03:19
ufo with tires? really?
awesome concept :)
StarDust
15th June 2012, 03:22
ufo with tires? really?
awesome concept :)
You assume that they are part of the craft; as opposed to being added to it by humans to move it/stabilize it on a semi. No way to confirm, but just a thought.
ghostrider
15th June 2012, 03:24
i bet we made this one , anyhoo looks cool. I've seen this pic somewhere before , I think it made the mainstream news. get ready folks ET is coming to get you ha ha lions and tigers and bears oh my. I know lets put a skin tight cover on the intergalactic space craft and make it easy for people to see what it is we are trying to hide.
modwiz
15th June 2012, 05:01
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
StarDust
15th June 2012, 05:15
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street? It doesn't make any sense.
Adding a few bumps under the gift wrap along with some standard issue landing gear mocked up provides plausible deniability.
eileenrose
15th June 2012, 05:19
Had that vision already. Post #1882, "Up at the Ranch" thread. 3 for 3. Someone might want to start paying attention to this man's blog...just saying....kinda of creepy how accurate I am getting and about what in particular.
....I realize some don't want to know what's really happening....just not me.
and ps: how come only him?
(no one else is confirming my remote views/vision...that is all I am saying...where are all the other remote viewers????). People keep going on and on how great they are at it. Too bad reality is a mixed bag isn't it (to them).
gigha
15th June 2012, 05:28
How could a "green glowing ufo" land at O'Hare airport and sit there for hours.
No Photo's no video?
I would like to believe it. But I don't think so.
And then get transported all the way to area51.
Now thats just silly, only some pics from one rest stop.
Anchor
15th June 2012, 05:44
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street?
<speculation>
Because it broke? Made in USA not in Outer Space..
Forced landing due to technical problems. Immobilized. Needed to be rescued.
</speculation>
Anchor
15th June 2012, 05:49
Of course, strictly speaking, since it is UNIDENTIFIED and it was a FLYING OBJECT, then it is/was a UFO.
The real question is was it ET or not?
modwiz
15th June 2012, 05:57
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street? It doesn't make any sense.
Adding a few bumps under the gift wrap along with some standard issue landing gear mocked up provides plausible deniability.
1. As Anchor has already stated, it probably can't fly.
2. The PTB (Psychopaths That Be) love seeing us make all kinds of stories up. Such 'damaged goods' need killin', in their view, and they are too pleased to do it. They love it when we create our own conspiracies. Helps keep the real ones out of view.
For the record. I fully believe in ET's and their craft being here. I just do not see one where I can see a stealth craft silhouette clearly. Not to mention common take-off/landing gear.
StarDust
15th June 2012, 06:10
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street?
<speculation>
Because it broke? Made in USA not in Outer Space..
Forced landing due to technical problems. Immobilized. Needed to be rescued.
</speculation>
As was my response to modwiz - speculation. But why would one of our stealth craft land on a public airport as opposed to a neighboring military one? Also, wouldn't it make sense to fly parts in as opposed to driving the craft cross country? Seems to me that it raises more questions than any official story could answer.
Precog
15th June 2012, 06:16
I feel sorry for anyone that believes a word that Kettler has to say.
gripreaper
15th June 2012, 06:18
We were promised a nuclear submarine land dart planted in a place like in front the National Monument obelisk, sticking 350 feet out of the ground.
This is pretty lame...
StarDust
15th June 2012, 06:22
Had that vision already. Post #1882, "Up at the Ranch" thread. 3 for 3. Someone might want to start paying attention to this man's blog...just saying....kinda of creepy how accurate I am getting and about what in particular.
....I realize some don't want to know what's really happening....just not me.
and ps: how come only him?
(no one else is confirming my remote views/vision...that is all I am saying...where are all the other remote viewers????). People keep going on and on how great they are at it. Too bad reality is a mixed bag isn't it (to them).
Good vision! Here's the direct link if anyone wan't to check out Eileen's post:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?3596-Up-At-The-Ranch--James-Gilliland-and-Trout-Lake-&p=503552&viewfull=1#post503552
¤=[Post Update]=¤
We were promised a nuclear submarine land dart planted in a place like in front the National Monument obelisk, sticking 350 feet out of the ground.
This is pretty lame...
If you read John's post, this is not from the good guys per se. Hardly see that as a let down…more like a break down on the side of the road;)
StarDust
15th June 2012, 06:28
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
Another pic with a bump….curious coincidence….
http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/8259/dsc04111bf7.jpg
Pic came from hyperlink within Kettler's report.
modwiz
15th June 2012, 06:31
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street?
<speculation>
Because it broke? Made in USA not in Outer Space..
Forced landing due to technical problems. Immobilized. Needed to be rescued.
</speculation>
As was my response to modwiz - speculation. But why would one of our stealth craft land on a public airport as opposed to a neighboring military one? Also, wouldn't it make sense to fly parts in as opposed to driving the craft cross country? Seems to me that it raises more questions than any official story could answer.
Stardust, I honestly believe this was a stunt to create a buzz. The more disinformation and hooha floating around the better we might miss an important story in all the noise. This was meant to make people think it was a UFO, IMO. It could even be the reason for 'protecting' it in a wrap.
I also have no way of knowing I am correct. My statements are my considered observations and opinions. I would not be so pig-headed as to say "I know" what is under the tarp. I am not insisting you are incorrect either. Perhaps we could start a raffle, LOL.
gripreaper
15th June 2012, 06:35
We were promised a nuclear submarine land dart planted in a place like in front of the National Monument obelisk, sticking 350 feet out of the ground.
This is pretty lame...
If you read John's post, this is not from the good guys per se. Hardly see that as a let down…more like a break down on the side of the road;)
I want the real thing. it's lame to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkEEjfdxWoc
StarDust
15th June 2012, 06:36
Stardust, I honestly believe this was a stunt to create a buzz. The more disinformation and hooha floating around the better we might miss an important story in all the noise. This was meant to make people think it was a UFO, IMO. It could even be the reason for 'protecting' it in a wrap.
I also have no way of knowing I am correct. My statements are my considered observations and opinions. I would not be so pig-headed as to say "I know" what is under the tarp. I am not insisting you are incorrect either. Perhaps we could start a raffle, LOL.
Fair enough. I'm not stating that anyone's opinions/observations here are incorrect. For the record, I'm only playing devil's advocate as I have no way of confirming what is under the wrap. Pure speculation on my part.
danceblackcatdance
15th June 2012, 06:58
the wheel struts look stupid? if this was a real et ufo wouldn't it be covered up properly, or in a top secret container of some sort.?.:)
Edit: the size of the wheels look bigger than other drones..
Chumley
15th June 2012, 07:12
Whatever it is it is Heavy! Those 22 wheelers can haul 100 thousand pound loads. My guess is that its the body of an intersteller Dinosaur used at some future opening of a Sinclair gas station.
Lettherebelight
15th June 2012, 07:24
These type of flying saucer 'ufo's have been experimentally engineered for decades. They have come up with some good designs, but I'm not sure this is one of them (a good one).
modwiz
15th June 2012, 07:49
Possibilities of consideration. No conclusive evidence. Top picture is a B-2 bomber. Bottom is F-17 stealth fighter. I would suggest that neither of these models is on the truck. The one on the truck more resembles the highly classified drone that Iran downed months ago. Resembles is used very lightly. It is covered up. :p
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/B-2_spirit_bombing.jpg/480px-B-2_spirit_bombing.jpg
http://a3.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/55/c45569e0c8a6edd50a6fe66d9058f286/l.jpg
christian
15th June 2012, 08:01
If I'd open a taco stand and wanted it to become a success, I might place a cardboard-ufo on top of the roof and have it brought to me by having for the people to see and wonder first to create a buzz and curiosity. What a stunt.
nonesuch
15th June 2012, 11:31
This thread's OP is incorrectly posted in the public UFO/Extraterrestrial Forum and I suspect deliberately so, instead of in the members-only Channeled and Other Controversial Materials Forum, where John's embarrassingly legless stories can be displayed without shame or risk of raising casual visitors' legitimate suspicions about Project Avalon’s mental health.
Industrious insomniac that I am...with the laziest click of a mouse, I put my superficial research skills to work for 20 seconds browsing Google Images before my single bead of sweaty effort yielded a trove of evidence shouting in accusatory unison that John's story is not about UFOs, but instead about the intelligence, accuracy and intent of his sources and sourcing.
While both his sources and sourcing are highly questionable, neither can actually be questioned on the record because of their perpetual absence. You'd think an ex-military intelligence officer, now a self-styled cub reporter on the intertubes, might recognize a U.S. drone in transport even when it is sexed up in skintight white vinyl drag for its high noon street performance.
Not to deliberately throw tepid water on the erect nipples of Avalon's greatest Kettler fanboy who posts these rumors and fictions…but below are links to news stories that easily call into question the Kettler Approved™ photo evidence of ”the actual UFO” he reports landing in broad daylight at the very populated O'Hare International Airport.
Between you and me, the real story here is how that flying piece of saucer managed to touch the tarmac on a sunny Chicago day (the very definition of broad when speaking of daylight) at a large public facility, without arousing the curiosity, much less the uncontrollable screams of joy or horror—depending on who you’re rooting for—of a single eyewitness capable of operating a cell phone.
Following that vast silence, there was no major or minor media coverage of the paradigm-crushing Miracle O’ The Midwest, except (royal trumpets, please!) in the exclusive scoop found nowhere else on Earth other than Specialist John Kettler's fertile website. He must be very important.
But enough about John, let’s talk about facts.
The following article deadpans that the craft is an X-47B Drone being trucked to the Patuxent Naval Air Station in Maryland:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-a-ufo-roll-through-on-d-c-s-beltway-last-night-see-the-pic/
Indulge yourself with this Fox(y) News story. It includes a photo of John’s UFO from a different angle, pulled by the same All-American, apple red cab:
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/18785637/beltway-ufo-said-to-be-military-drone-aircraft?clienttype=printable
Or get a load of this: http://www.geekosystem.com/x47b-roadtrip/
Or this—from the naughty Northrup Grumman website, where you can view a full frontal of the drone, sans white cloaking device (a.k.a., tarp)—the hottest pic is the third one down on the right:
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=259264
I could go on, but let me get at least an hour of sleep before the bad reviews and outraged rebuttals hit the newsstands.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Disclaimers: All characters in this post are fictitious. Any resemblance to anyone living or dead (or both) is purely coincidental, so you should be grateful for getting the attention you crave, my imaginary friend. Nothing real was harmed in the production of this post.
Knowrainknowrainbows!
15th June 2012, 11:45
Nonesuch wrote,
"Between you and me, the real story here is how that flying piece of saucer managed to touch the tarmac on a sunny Chicago day (the very definition of broad when speaking of daylight) at a large public facility, without arousing the curiosity, much less the uncontrollable screams of joy or horror—depending on who you’re rooting for—of a single eyewitness capable of operating a cell phone. Following that vast silence, there was no major or minor media coverage of the paradigm-crushing Miracle O’ The Midwest, except (royal trumpets, please!) in the exclusive scoop found nowhere else on Earth but Specialist John Kettler's fertile website. He must be really important."
I so enjoyed reading your post ...
Thanks for a very good start to my day!
KRKR
WhiteFeather
15th June 2012, 12:00
I agree this could very well be a craft made by the american car company known as Ford Motors. Notice they have a reputation with cars and craft they manufacture.
F ixed
O r
R epaired
D aily
Or
F ound
O n
R oad
D ead
IMO its Definately a Ford.
mountain_jim
15th June 2012, 12:43
Kettler further reduces his credibility (with me) toward zero with this report. Thanks for your excellent documentation, nonesuch.
Perhaps he should keep his reports to those from his 'ET/ED' sources which can not be proved one way or another.
RMorgan
15th June 2012, 13:56
Kettler further reduces his credibility (with me) toward zero with this report. Thanks for your excellent documentation, nonesuch.
Perhaps he should keep his reports to those from his 'ET/ED' sources which can not be proved one way or another.
What credibility, mate?
At least for me, he´s never given any reason or information that would even slightly help building up something close to credibility.
To build up some credibility, at least in the news world, one must say a reasonable amount of things that end up being right, or say a reasonable amount of insightful things that makes a lot of sense.
Here´s the UFO, the X47-B, or another unmanned aircraft similar to it:
http://robotpig.net/_images/posts/x47b_3.jpg
http://www.ufo-contact.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Northrop-Grumman-X-47B-UCAS-Unmanned-Combat-Air-System.jpeg
http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/galleries/images/81099/500x400/x-47b.JPG
Cheers,
Raf.
the_flyingboy
15th June 2012, 14:09
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
I've seen this before it's a prototype it does have small wings they get plugged in .
Zencat
15th June 2012, 14:09
Yes, it's an X-47B drone.
Kettler lost all credibility when he claimed that Kim Jong Un (Korean 'beloved Supreme Leader Jr.) had been assassinated and what we saw was a clone.
He's either delusional, an egomaniac or a jackass - or all three ....
In any case, he's a major distraction.
SKIBADABOMSKI
15th June 2012, 14:19
They took off the wings for easy transport and wrapped it in a white material. Thus it looked like a saucer.
But this was a decoy of course.. the real Aliens were on the tarmac asking for directions to Indigostar's house to remove the implant on said hand. They were told Indigo had cancelled the meeting and they left.
SKi-
mountain_jim
15th June 2012, 14:27
Well I guess credibility was not the best word choice.
But I started to be hopeful and keep an open mind about Kettler's writings at first, as he showed up on the scene out of nowhere. That benefit of the doubt, awaiting further info to go one way or the other, has now been reduced to zero. :)
As Cartomancer posted in Current Events, a possibly related event in Washington vid:
O_G3QA6B6V0
Airwooz
15th June 2012, 14:36
Looks like a stealth drone to me, probably a bigger version of x-47 without the wings attached to it.
Cartomancer
15th June 2012, 14:38
OK. Sorry about starting a thread for the D.C. "sighting" separately. I really can't believe that someone would actually turn this incident into a "UFO" story. As I said in the other thread I lived in Virginia when the stealth fighter was first deployed publicly. Then there was a huge rash of UFO sightings in that area. That is what is going to happen when they deploy these domestically. That has already been planned. They already actually have high altitude blimps for surveillance which they have absolutely no warrants or right to do under the constitution. The arrests for all kinds of crap are going to begin soon because of these things. Fat heads like to play with their toys.
I really can't believe that this Kettler guy actually released a story hinting that this was a UFO of some type? Everyone is so anxious to have a breaking story or to predict something that we are getting mired in B.S. here.
danceblackcatdance
15th June 2012, 14:54
found previous reports of ufo at O'Hare... never any footage though :D
TT3uGJQZuBg
IXFuzWL4o8E
13th Warrior
15th June 2012, 15:32
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
No doubt one of 30,000 drones to be in the US skies...
I now see plenty of people have pointed out this to be a drone...good work people!
eileenrose
16th June 2012, 03:49
Now that disclosure is happening, I notice some people even here on PA are refusing to see it.
Isn't that always the case?
Things never turn out the way we expect them to. But that is the mind for you.
I saw these posts (just 3 so far) as confirmations of exposure of aliens on our planet. I confirmed them (myself) through my own intuitive side. I posted my findings days before each of his three reports.
But since I don't feel like negative ET attacks, I am not going to expose myself more than need be.
Believe what you want to.
But disclosure is just happening all around you, if you (anyone) cares to watch it happen.
And who said it would happen in a way your mind can accept?
...just saying. You are the natives that didn't see the Spaniard ships (old story)...because they didn't exist in their version of reality. It took a shaman to show them (part of that story) they existed, at all.
So I am saying, this is real. Sorry to dissappoint the naysayers. And I have no regrets about putting this out there (in public). Like I said in my previous post. This is for real. Take it or leave it. Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
And yes, it is the greys. But you (deep down) already knew this. ...I can go into this if requested (from a nicer place then the previous 'hate kettler' postings).
danceblackcatdance
16th June 2012, 09:56
...Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
...I can go into this if requested
I think / feel similarly.. It's happening regardless... Here's a request to go into this more pls & thx :)
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
Spot on Modwiz. It is a miltary stealth craft not a UFO.
mountain_jim
16th June 2012, 15:19
Now that disclosure is happening, I notice some people even here on PA are refusing to see it.
Isn't that always the case?
Things never turn out the way we expect them to. But that is the mind for you.
I saw these posts (just 3 so far) as confirmations of exposure of aliens on our planet. I confirmed them (myself) through my own intuitive side. I posted my findings days before each of his three reports.
But since I don't feel like negative ET attacks, I am not going to expose myself more than need be.
Believe what you want to.
But disclosure is just happening all around you, if you (anyone) cares to watch it happen.
And who said it would happen in a way your mind can accept?
...just saying. You are the natives that didn't see the Spaniard ships (old story)...because they didn't exist in their version of reality. It took a shaman to show them (part of that story) they existed, at all.
So I am saying, this is real. Sorry to dissappoint the naysayers. And I have no regrets about putting this out there (in public). Like I said in my previous post. This is for real. Take it or leave it. Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
And yes, it is the greys. But you (deep down) already knew this. ...I can go into this if requested (from a nicer place then the previous 'hate kettler' postings).
Disclosure is happening (drip drip), but this report seems a pretty feeble effort in that regard. And your belittling of those of us here that can discern that has not gone unnoticed.
There might be a real interesting event behind the radiation and reported troop movements and such, but using this post of Kettler's to confirm your remote views and to describe the rational evidence gatherers in this thread as 'naysayers' is 'weak sauce', for Kettler's claims in this article are not backed up by any evidence of value, in my view.
If there really was a captured ET ship at the airport, why does he post such an obvious BS drone picture (edit- ok he explains they created this fake-drone to hide what it really is), claim events at a location that hundreds would have observed, yet no others have reported, and then he links (green-glowing UFO) to a picture that has been spread around the internet for years and implies it is from this event?
That is either tremendously sloppy or just plain disingenuous. I don't 'hate Kettler', I hate sloppy reporting and/or disingenuous attempts to mislead people.
The previous, well-documented event at this airport (Nov 7, 2006) was reported by flight crews, pilots, workers on the ground, tower employees, was visible on radar, and produced enough evidence that it has been the subject of several TV shows.
The only aspect of Disclosure that Kettler's article supports is that the field is overrun with disinfo and/or unsupported claims. It is beginning to look like Kettler is trying to see how far he can stretch his absurdities and still find believers, as if he is really Tavistock Institute - US division.
And no your remote views or visions prior to this report don't give his report (in its current form) any more validity, in my rational and intuitively-supported opinion.
Edit: I am certainly ready and able and waiting for additional witness reports or other evidence to these airport events, but until then I would hope that if Kettler is disclosing real info he would do a better job of credible reporting, making it clear where stock photos are used, providing supplementary evidence, etc.
Some discussion from GLP that might be closer to the real situation:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1894063/pg8
My thought is that it is diversion/disinfo to get people to think that this thing is what caused the radiation ---- while they are covering what really did cause it.
Anybody got a geiger counter to try to check the area around this drone out?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17690801
This was meant to be seen...thus they wanted the shape to be known.
If this was to do with the radiation from a few days back, this would be the decoy. While everybody was looking at this heading in that direction, then we should have looked what was going the other direction, because that what would have been important.
if this was really important, they would have disguised the shape much better. This was intentional.
1. Moved in daylight
2. Shape clearly visible
3. Put on "display" at rest area (even brought construction cones)
4. Stopping makes it a target (and a great photo op). They even brought a spare truck and trailer, but cant put two drivers in each rig to keep it moving?
No doubt, it was intentional. What is more important is why?
Even later edit: I have read all the comments at Kettler's site, including Eileen's. I could believe something happened, and even that this picture could be of something else disguised to appear to be a US drone.
What I can't rationally go along with, is that a 'green glowing UFO ... sat there motionless on the ground for hours' at O'Hare without someone external to Kettler's sources noticing and reporting on this incident - including tying it to an O'Hare location, during it's time on the ground, treatments and examination by various government persons, it's wrapping, and loading on this truck for transport.
I would expect if all this happened, it was either somewhere other than O'Hare, or maybe the MIB flashed their device and all witnesses lost their memories. :)
I would love to be proved wrong, and await any updates to add credence to this account.
Awakened
17th June 2012, 00:10
What's the purpose of these drones? They wouldn't happen to have anything to do with the suspected, impending false alien attack would they? :confused:
9eagle9
17th June 2012, 00:26
I'm frustrated that it took off again without packing off a whole bunch of sheep to another planet as they keep insistently promising us.
Camilo
17th June 2012, 01:38
I'm not buying it.
Maia Gabrial
17th June 2012, 01:51
How could a "green glowing ufo" land at O'Hare airport and sit there for hours.
No Photo's no video?
I would like to believe it. But I don't think so.
And then get transported all the way to area51.
Now thats just silly, only some pics from one rest stop.
I agree. Sounds too phony....
Because it broke? Made in USA not in Outer Space..
Forced landing due to technical problems. Immobilized. Needed to be rescued.
</speculation>
Could possibly be made in China... crap parts sold to the military....
Maia Gabrial
17th June 2012, 01:57
Stardust, I honestly believe this was a stunt to create a buzz. The more disinformation and hooha floating around the better we might miss an important story in all the noise. This was meant to make people think it was a UFO, IMO. It could even be the reason for 'protecting' it in a wrap.
I also have no way of knowing I am correct. My statements are my considered observations and opinions. I would not be so pig-headed as to say "I know" what is under the tarp. I am not insisting you are incorrect either. Perhaps we could start a raffle, LOL.
I agree with modwiz on this. AND I think it's pretty strange that it landed with NO occupants on board. Most likely it was remotely flown in to cause some stir with people. If it's anything, I'm betting that black ops is behind this event.
9eagle9
17th June 2012, 01:57
The mechanics at the airport are more accustomed to working on Boeing airplanes, and civilians are usually not invited to peer into the workings of highly secured military aircraft lest there is the chance they sell that technology to some fourth world nation?
Why did the men in black ominously pull weapons on curious stander bys at the rest area. It's not exactly evidence that is a ufo, Civilians are not usually invited to peer into the workings of highly secured military aircraft lest .....
Other remote viewers are not interested in rv'ing this episode because its not interesting.
This is a stealth aircraft. The window bump is distinct above the forward, single, wheel. The tapering body towards the tail is also there if one looks for it. It has the 3 wheel position of any fighter jet.
If it were in fact one of our stealth fighters, then why wouldn't they just fly it to where it needs to go? How often do you see a perfectly good plane being driven down the street?
<speculation>
Because it broke? Made in USA not in Outer Space..
Forced landing due to technical problems. Immobilized. Needed to be rescued.
</speculation>
eileenrose
17th June 2012, 02:25
...Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
...I can go into this if requested
I think / feel similarly.. It's happening regardless... Here's a request to go into this more pls & thx :)
Well, one nice request. (and one negative retort).
So mixed reception on my reporting what I saw myself. Not so much about John, as I don't know him, his crew, his posts, his ETs or anything regarding their set up.
I just sit at home and have visions/use remote viewing. It is a hobby.
So I will add the one extra element. I saw it in flight, or at least it had lights on it.
so there...another tidbit. It works.
9eagle9
17th June 2012, 02:37
I can commiserate I'd prefer remote viewers to observe to change the circumstances of certain events, but since they prefer to use it to predict the future rather than change circumstances now, there isn't anything I can do about it.
This a circumstance that I don't particularly feel is change worthy. If it is a ufo I'm sure its plans for future use aren't pinned on the control panel for all to read.
If it's a military craft I'm sure its intended use isn't pinned on the control panel for all to read.
Maia Gabrial
17th June 2012, 15:22
Well, one nice request. (and one negative retort).
So mixed reception on my reporting what I saw myself. Not so much about John, as I don't know him, his crew, his posts, his ETs or anything regarding their set up.
I just sit at home and have visions/use remote viewing. It is a hobby.
So I will add the one extra element. I saw it in flight, or at least it had lights on it.
so there...another tidbit. It works.
I'm thinking that sometimes we just don't understand what we're seeing in a vision or remote viewing. You might have seen it and thought it was UFO, but what was it really? How many times do people see lights in the sky that turned out to be nothing more than the military's latest secret plane? People misidentify all the time. Why not in visions and remote viewing?
I recently was shown in a vision some type of device/technology that had many long spikes coming out of it. Then I saw the spikes shattered into many shards. While I was trying to mentally figure that out, I realized that this thing had kept things in balance. Then, I heard a strange voice saying "Don't use this against John (Kettler) or he'll kick your a**".. I had to laugh at the threat. Why the threat? Did this whole vision mean that Kettler is upsetting the balance of things?
Hell if I know what this vision meant..... Do you?
Just the USA showing off its brutal aggressive military strength to the rest of the world, where there is uncontained and unstainable population growth and depeletion/corrpution of natural resources?
In one of Kettler's interviews he mentioned being given a recipe for dead lizzies from the ETDs. That kind of blew all of his credibility for me. It seems this isn't going to do it much good either.
eileenrose
18th June 2012, 00:54
Well, one nice request. (and one negative retort).
So mixed reception on my reporting what I saw myself. Not so much about John, as I don't know him, his crew, his posts, his ETs or anything regarding their set up.
I just sit at home and have visions/use remote viewing. It is a hobby.
So I will add the one extra element. I saw it in flight, or at least it had lights on it.
so there...another tidbit. It works.
I'm thinking that sometimes we just don't understand what we're seeing in a vision or remote viewing. You might have seen it and thought it was UFO, but what was it really? How many times do people see lights in the sky that turned out to be nothing more than the military's latest secret plane? People misidentify all the time. Why not in visions and remote viewing?
I recently was shown in a vision some type of device/technology that had many long spikes coming out of it. Then I saw the spikes shattered into many shards. While I was trying to mentally figure that out, I realized that this thing had kept things in balance. Then, I heard a strange voice saying "Don't use this against John (Kettler) or he'll kick your a**".. I had to laugh at the threat. Why the threat? Did this whole vision mean that Kettler is upsetting the balance of things?
Hell if I know what this vision meant..... Do you?
Are you asking how I knew it was a UFO and not some enigma of my mind? That is why I post them verses keeping it to myself (my visions/remote views). I've been predicting/seeing for the last some odd years now and each one gets verified, in its own time. I just don't make money at it and always keep checking, with others, to see what actually manifest (verses what the 'ether' demonstrated (to me)). Make sense now?
...so I am fine if I am dis-credited as I don't charge nor collect fees, so it makes little difference (to mine self). I just do it to demonstrate it's feasibility. Must be the scientist in me.
Anchor
18th June 2012, 05:31
Are you asking how I knew it was a UFO and not some enigma of my mind? That is why I post them verses keeping it to myself (my visions/remote views). I've been predicting/seeing for the last some odd years now and each one gets verified, in its own time. I just don't make money at it and always keep checking, with others, to see what actually manifest (verses what the 'ether' demonstrated (to me)). Make sense now?
...so I am fine if I am dis-credited as I don't charge nor collect fees, so it makes little difference (to mine self). I just do it to demonstrate it's feasibility. Must be the scientist in me.
So I read that in the context of your former statement:
Now that disclosure is happening, I notice some people even here on PA are refusing to see it.
....
...just saying. You are the natives that didn't see the Spaniard ships (old story)...because they didn't exist in their version of reality. It took a shaman to show them (part of that story) they existed, at all.
So I am saying, this is real. Sorry to dissappoint the naysayers. And I have no regrets about putting this out there (in public). Like I said in my previous post. This is for real. Take it or leave it. Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
Are you performing the role of shaman?
--
No one has proved this story either way. Nor can they. This is the nature of this Alt Media/MSM game.
All we have are opinions and speculation - no matter how they came about - and there do seem to be to elements of a cover story that suggest that something odd is going on here in the material that was associated with this in the main stream media.
My personal theory is that this is orchestrated distraction so we don't see something else - either in this situation, or another happening elsewhere.
And so it goes on...
A lot of RV'rs I have read about steer clear of Military work since that is often "guarded" and there are interesting things to greet curious civilian RV'rs who are in a state of polarity when working.
The RV'rs who are unaffected by that, are those above the polarity game anyway and usually have no comment.
Either-way we don't get any further information :)
9eagle9
18th June 2012, 12:54
Anchor people who RV the military and black ops have minds like fortresses. The Military using the same mental tricks are just another branch of the masters of psychology ; its not a place for people 'who think ' they know what they are doing or that 'white' lite will protect them because it doesn't have anything to do with lite. It's a learned mental ability and people who are good at it have very agile and suspicious minds. You have to know the tricks of the opponent in order to navigate spaces like that undetected because they can snag you in so quick and have you dancing like a puppet in no time.
I have to wonder why people who are so certain that ET's are are orchestrating world events, are even getting nightly pep talks from them, need an an official approval of "Disclosed" from the White House or United Nations.
Most of us agree that there is extraterrestrial life out there good, bad and indifferent. This urgency that ET's to reveal themselves through official channels is what puzzles me when we know the official story tellers are liars. Is that going to make their existence more real? Because a pack of liars said it was?
The urgency that ET's must come here and begin orchestrating things, period, is what puzzles me. MUST? Transferring our epidemic co-dependency off planet isn't a good idea.
"I'm traveling across light years of space and the first thing I want to do when I arrive at my destination is start fixing things for people?" That is nearly like imposing our slave mentality unto them ; if there is anything in the world that would keep an advanced species away that would be it. It keeps non advanced species like myself away, anyway.
If they are discreetly fixing things as some claim why would one want to reveal them to the parties that ****ed things up in the first place?
A horrible terrible thought but what if they land and decide, (since they have free clearance to orchestrate everything) that we have to get rid of all our bull**** religions and special ideas we have about ourselves?
Or because we've given them free pass to orchestrate everything and what we are currently experiencing is what they came up with because....we weren't using our critical thinking skills or having full disclosure within ourselves about what agreement entails?
Anchor
18th June 2012, 13:03
Anchor people who RV the military and black ops have minds like fortresses. The Military using the same mental tricks are just another branch of the masters of psychology ; its not a place for people 'who think ' they know what they are doing or that 'white' lite will protect them because it doesn't have anything to do with lite. It's a learned mental ability and people who are good at it have very agile and suspicious minds. You have to know the tricks of the opponent in order to navigate spaces like that undetected because they can snag you in so quick and have you dancing like a puppet in no time.
Yes, I like the way you put it. I was basically saying if you are a RV beginner, the military is not the best place to start snooping around.
PS: just in case anyone thinks I am presenting myself as a RV expert, I am not. I don't even do it. The reason I don't play that way - even if I can - is because I know that it is a dangerous distraction for ME. It is my particular slip of arrogance to assume that this applies to other people, and if it does not, then sorry.
9eagle9
18th June 2012, 13:18
RV in general is going into another space that has long been refined and dominated by the 'not well intentioned'. Not all that different than spaces of astral travel where things are masked to prompt an emotional response.
As you said the only people who have a chance of navigating that sort of space well are people who have done a lot of work on themselves and can remain,detached and not start having emotional reactions which are like blaring marquee announcements of one's presence or assign values to or projections on to what they are witnessing. Better yet not even thinking while one is doing it gives one a better chance of moving around undetected.
On the other hand RV can be a powerful tool for change but one has to master themselves before they can utilize it in such a manner.
Maia Gabrial
18th June 2012, 15:52
I had hoped that you wouldn't feel that way, eileenrose. You're not discredited per se. But sometimes we just don't know what we're seeing. It's good that you get the verification, though. It'll be interesting to see if that's the case with this so called UFO. But I'm thinking that the way this one is being handled is too suspicious. No aliens aboard? How weird is that?
As for the gift wrapping, have you ever seen a hockey stick being gift wrapped? You can tell what it is by the shape. There are people like modwiz and others who can definitely identify air craft just by the shapes.
Someone is pulling a fast one on Kettler.... IMO.
I'm going to throw this one into the "Deceptions" pile....
danceblackcatdance
18th June 2012, 19:14
just curious eileenrose, because i thought a while ago i saw you write something like you hadn't seen any evidence that ets are real, if thats so.. do you think they are now or this is a man made ufo craft?
anyway, so.. just playing about with these are x-47b uav's
169281692916930
whatever this is, not only did they remove the panels that cover the wheels when they wrapped it (possible), but could be my imagination.. this looks absolutely huge in comparison to all the pics using the man for scale :)
16937
:)
edit: just playing about here... re: Kettler, i love the stories (obviously) but the skeptical part of me wants proof (naturally)..
modwiz
18th June 2012, 19:20
RV in general is going into another space that has long been refined and dominated by the 'not well intentioned'. Not all that different than spaces of astral travel where things are masked to prompt an emotional response.
As you said the only people who have a chance of navigating that sort of space well are people who have done a lot of work on themselves and can remain,detached and not start having emotional reactions which are like blaring marquee announcements of one's presence or assign values to or projections on to what they are witnessing. Better yet not even thinking while one is doing it gives one a better chance of moving around undetected.
On the other hand RV can be a powerful tool for change but one has to master themselves before they can utilize it in such a manner.
Does that include being house trained? :confused:
9eagle9
18th June 2012, 21:08
Domestication is an option, housetrained is a preference.
RV in general is going into another space that has long been refined and dominated by the 'not well intentioned'. Not all that different than spaces of astral travel where things are masked to prompt an emotional response.
As you said the only people who have a chance of navigating that sort of space well are people who have done a lot of work on themselves and can remain,detached and not start having emotional reactions which are like blaring marquee announcements of one's presence or assign values to or projections on to what they are witnessing. Better yet not even thinking while one is doing it gives one a better chance of moving around undetected.
On the other hand RV can be a powerful tool for change but one has to master themselves before they can utilize it in such a manner.
Does that include being house trained? :confused:
eileenrose
19th June 2012, 02:55
Hi Anchor,
re: "A lot of RV'rs I have read about steer clear of Military work since that is often "guarded" and there are interesting things to greet curious civilian RV'rs who are in a state of polarity when working."
Yes, I avoid the military. And I steer away from their projects. And I still randomly get attacked, in the ether visits I have regularly, and I don't stopped to figure out where they are produced. I just deal with them and move on,
I've already been told off which projects are 'all hands off' and which arn't. So no problems. For me. I just don't take any request. As the person requesting something wouldn't know any of this and could put both of us at risk. Hence no money deals (that would risk exposure to more circumstances/situations than I currently need...for my own growth).
I keep it all on a very tight schedule (my 'supposedly' random remote views). Because while you can't go front (attack) there is a zillion side ways ways to view things.
eileenrose
19th June 2012, 02:59
I had hoped that you wouldn't feel that way, eileenrose. You're not discredited per se. But sometimes we just don't know what we're seeing. It's good that you get the verification, though. It'll be interesting to see if that's the case with this so called UFO. But I'm thinking that the way this one is being handled is too suspicious. No aliens aboard? How weird is that?
As for the gift wrapping, have you ever seen a hockey stick being gift wrapped? You can tell what it is by the shape. There are people like modwiz and others who can definitely identify air craft just by the shapes.
Someone is pulling a fast one on Kettler.... IMO.
I'm going to throw this one into the "Deceptions" pile....
Separate the presenter (of said information, John in this circumstance) from the information itself. The only way (detaching from outcome).
Otherwise you get caught in their stuff (who knows what deals he's made...and what negative results will likely happen to him.......I'm just saying...whistleblowers have shorter life spans)
truth4me
19th June 2012, 03:06
I feel sorry for anyone that believes a word that Kettler has to say.Agree with you. Something about Kettler just doesn't resonate with me....Disinfo agent? maybe.....
Kindred
19th June 2012, 20:37
They took off the wings for easy transport and wrapped it in a white material. Thus it looked like a saucer.
SKi-
I thought is was one of those drones... they had a 'scare' a little while back in some small mid-west town, with one of these very same things going though town (again on a low-boy trailer) and everybody got uppity about it.
The 'white material' is what is known as 'shrink-wrap', and is used to cover all kinds of things, particularly, boats for storage (it also comes in blue). This stuff comes in HUGE rolls of 20', 30' or more wide (folded to about 4' wide) and 500' long, which is then tightly wrapped around the object using special wide adhesive tape. Then, a special propane heat gun (some on a wand about 12' long) is used to shrink this plastic so that it is 'formed' to the shape of the object, just like heat-shrink tubing for electrical work. You can even 'melt' additional pieces into place (if you're good with the heat gun!).
http://www.atlanticshrinkwrap.com/
In Unity, Peace and Love
Maia Gabrial
19th June 2012, 20:47
Separate the presenter (of said information, John in this circumstance) from the information itself. The only way (detaching from outcome).
Otherwise you get caught in their stuff (who knows what deals he's made...and what negative results will likely happen to him.......I'm just saying...whistleblowers have shorter life spans)
Okay, my mouth dropped open, eileenrose! I'm thinking he's no whistleblower. I keep getting the feeling that he's NSA or something. Time will tell....
peace
19th June 2012, 21:28
We were promised a nuclear submarine land dart planted in a place like in front the National Monument obelisk, sticking 350 feet out of the ground.
This is pretty lame...
don't hold your breath.
eileenrose
20th June 2012, 02:43
Separate the presenter (of said information, John in this circumstance) from the information itself. The only way (detaching from outcome).
Otherwise you get caught in their stuff (who knows what deals he's made...and what negative results will likely happen to him.......I'm just saying...whistleblowers have shorter life spans)
Okay, my mouth dropped open, eileenrose! I'm thinking he's no whistleblower. I keep getting the feeling that he's NSA or something. Time will tell....
I'm not clear why you wouldn't put him in a whistleblower capacity. And, whistleblowers are well known for putting out information to distract from other projects. One reason I never take their side or not take their side.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.