PDA

View Full Version : US Will Sign Gun Control Treaty on July 27! Dick Morris TV: Lunch ALERT!



Unified Serenity
6th July 2012, 02:29
This is very alarming if it's true. Obama and Clinton to sign an arms treaty supposedly on July 27th!

XZeJpXLsVCI

This looks like the camels nose under the tent.

Edit to add from Infowars:

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 5, 2012

United Nations apparatchiks are finalizing details on the Arms Trade Treaty and the Obama administration is taking an active role. A treaty conference commenced on July 3 at the United Nations and is scheduled to run through July 27. Attendees will spend nearly a month tweaking a treaty draft.


http://www.euranet.eu/var/ezwebin_site/storage/images/media/images/english-images/un-gun/3800265-1-eng-GB/UN-gun_teaser.jpgKnotted gun sculpture at the United Nations.


“Our common goal is clear: a robust and legally binding Arms Trade Treaty that will have a real impact on the lives of those millions of people suffering from the consequences of armed conflict, repression and armed violence,” said United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hgapuWDC9mHlJTjgDil9wm4ic6Ng?docId=f4fd6c30e6244cc69350b5c015c437cc) at the opening of the conference. “It is ambitious, but it is achievable.”


“The outcome will not seek to prohibit citizens of any country from possessing firearms or to interfere with the legal trade in small arms and light weapons,” a press release (http://www.defpro.com/news/details/37134/?SID=bf4e455a42363e6bd90635d299ee6086) issued by the United Nations’ Office for Disarmament Affairs insists.


130 members of the House, however, are not convinced the treaty does not pose a threat to the Second Amendment. On June 29, they sent a letter (http://kelly.house.gov/sites/kelly.house.gov/files/ATT%20Letter.pdf) to Obama and Secretary of State Clinton expressing concerns about the treaty.


The letter states that the treaty infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms” and says the United States government does not have the right to support a treaty that violates the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.


Critics warn the treaty will result in mandatory gun registration.
“Registration makes it easy for a tyrannical government to confiscate firearms and to make prey of its subjects,” writes Stephen P. Halbrook (http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/registration_article/registration.html).Others argue that gun registration is essentially confiscation. “The only purpose of gun registration is gun confiscation, whether it is done individually and piecemeal, as the legal requirements to own a gun become more and more difficult, or en mass, when the government feels the necessity to disarm its citizens in order to further its control,” notes Dean Weingarten (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608785/posts).


Democrats believe Republicans and Second Amendment advocates are grandstanding the issue for political gain and say the treaty does not threaten the Second Amendment.
Michigan Democrat senator Carl Levin (http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/obama-told-to-back-off-u-n-gun-treaty/) has stated that he believes that worries the treaty will limit the Second Amendment are “misplaced.”


The NRA gave Levin an “F” for his gun control voting record (http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Carl_Levin_Gun_Control.htm). He has voted for government background checks at gun shows and has voted to close the so-called “gun show loophole.”

white wizard
6th July 2012, 02:51
They can keep on trying to regulate guns, but considering the vast majority of Americans

are already heavily armed it wont do much good on there side. I think Obama would be

smart to not let that pass, because it would infuriate the NRA and gun owners. It

would also destroy what little trust people have in congress and all the so called

kooks out there who said Obama would take away our guns would be proven right.

It is also important to note there is an election going on so if he did that it would

give Republicans an excuse to actually go out and vote and could lead to him loosing

the election. If you take all that into consideration he might not sign it, but he signed

health care into power and got rid of due process so honestly at this point nothing

would shock me.

Unified Serenity
6th July 2012, 02:59
But of coarse since our electoral system was bought by a European company recently they get to tabulate our votes and tell us so magnanimously how we voted! They are pushing for a violent protest and uproar.

TigaHawk
6th July 2012, 03:15
They can keep on trying to regulate guns, but considering the vast majority of Americans

are already heavily armed it wont do much good on there side. I think Obama would be

smart to not let that pass, because it would infuriate the NRA and gun owners. It

would also destroy what little trust people have in congress and all the so called

kooks out there who said Obama would take away our guns would be proven right.

It is also important to note there is an election going on so if he did that it would

give Republicans an excuse to actually go out and vote and could lead to him loosing

the election. If you take all that into consideration he might not sign it, but he signed

health care into power and got rid of due process so honestly at this point nothing

would shock me.


Like how they disarmed Australia?

People had to hand over their heirloom guns, fully engraved with beautifull designs, some even had gold in them as part of it, and were in display cases mounted on their walls.

all taken and crushed into pieces, then melted down and sold to china.


Would love to see you americans actualy do something should they try to disarm you.


Edit - also nothing good came from disarming Australia. Now the only people that have guns are criminals and the police. Neither are good, because the police here are absolutely worthless and no good at defending/doing anything of value for Australian citizens. They are merely POLICY enforcers, and revenue raisers (http://www.earlyfalconcarclubqld.org.au/attachments/20110612115607_SOO%20car2[1].jpg) and after seeing them driving around the city this week with their red lights flashing and scrolling text going "go the marons (http://media.apnonline.com.au/img/media/images/2012/06/25/9-1350439-QLD250612POLICECAR_t325.jpg)" it further proves their useless comercial tools.

white wizard
6th July 2012, 03:41
They can keep on trying to regulate guns, but considering the vast majority of Americans

are already heavily armed it wont do much good on there side. I think Obama would be

smart to not let that pass, because it would infuriate the NRA and gun owners. It

would also destroy what little trust people have in congress and all the so called

kooks out there who said Obama would take away our guns would be proven right.

It is also important to note there is an election going on so if he did that it would

give Republicans an excuse to actually go out and vote and could lead to him loosing

the election. If you take all that into consideration he might not sign it, but he signed

health care into power and got rid of due process so honestly at this point nothing

would shock me.


Like how they disarmed Australia?

People had to hand over their heirloom guns, fully engraved with beautifull designs, some even had gold in them as part of it, and were in display cases mounted on their walls.

all taken and crushed into pieces, then melted down and sold to china.


Would love to see you americans actualy do something should they try to disarm you.


Edit - also nothing good came from disarming Australia. Now the only people that have guns are criminals and the police. Neither are good, because the police here are absolutely worthless and no good at defending/doing anything of value for Australian citizens.

You must not know Americans, the only thing a lot of them really care about is

there guns. It would be interesting to see the U.N. tell America citizens to give us

all your guns. It would probably be funny to watch when actually come to get them

and they get a big kiss my #$% come get em ;). It would be a political nightmare

and when people start getting hurt on both sides your gonna see a major backlash.

Unified Serenity
6th July 2012, 03:42
I agree white wizard. Though, I would give them a piece of crap paper weight that is supposedly a gun. Give em what they want, a gun. Then go oil up the good stuff later.

Maia Gabrial
6th July 2012, 17:45
First off, if this were a REAL govt, they'd know they CAN'T take away gun rights which is in violation of the Constitution. If they continue in the same bull**** line of thinking, they're going to expose their real agendas. More Americans will see it. Many people AREN'T WILLING to give up their rights, even if the DC pukes are.
People should be asking WHY do they want this gun control so badly? Most people can answer that for themselves. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out. What I'm waiting for is for people to finally realize that this POSER govt is NOT for the People. They never have been. Everything that has gone on throughout American history is what lead up to now. Only they didn't count on the American People clinging to the Constitution as they have. Maybe the DC pukes think all they have to do is SAY it's gone and Americans have to accept it. God damn it! That's not happening! I'd rather see the pukes lined up against the Capitol wall and shot dead than see one of our Constitutional rights taken away. They CAN'T take it away.....

crested-duck
7th July 2012, 01:21
A Govt that doesn't trust it's citizens to bear arms, is a Govt not to be trusted by it's citizens!!!

foreverfan
7th July 2012, 03:25
Do you know of any Sheriff that would be stupid enough to try to collect guns from Americans? I don't know of any Police personally that would do it.

Do you think the Military is stupid enough to try it? This is treason of the highest order and I think EVERY American would instantly wake up. They won't find just guns but bullets too. They will have to kick down doors. Americans know better.

You though 911 back fired... just wait.

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn224/XxZeke_SeradinxX/funny-pictures-cat-giving-finger.jpg

Lost Soul
7th July 2012, 05:07
The UN has failed miserably in Rwanda, other parts of Africa and in former Yugoslavia. It's peacekeepers backed off and allowed unarmed refugees get slaughtered. This same UN now proposes to control small arms? Disband it as a threat to mankind.