PDA

View Full Version : Wtc 9/11 2nd plane was a military plane evidence (many new witnesses)



Mulder
8th July 2012, 22:41
55Zq-KPjJYM

How did the shadow government (the conspirators) take over the planes?

Answer: They could have done it by having CIA agents on the plane along with their arab mercinaries and made the people believe it was a hijacking, and then flown the plane manually to a remote base where they got rid of all the passengers and then took the plane apart.

Possibility 2: They just took over the plane from the ground, turned off the transponder and then flew the plane to wherever they prepared it for. (All commercial airliners are designed so that full control can be taken of the plane from the ground).

What about the PHONE calls that were made by the passengers?

Answer: If you believe that no such thing as voice morph is possible that can fool relatives and loved ones, watch "The afterlife investigations". The calls were impossible and many were suspicious, for example, Ted Olson claimed that his wife called him from a seatphone from 1 of the planes, turns out that particular American Airlines plane had no seatphones.

His testimony contradicts what the FBI later concluded in their "investigation" about the calls. Ted Olson was also a Bush administration insider, they could have very well just made him come up with this story to give some credibility to the hijacker theory.

Why are there around 3 people who said the second plane was United Airlines?

Answer: It is expected that the shadow government would have actors ready on phone/running around trying to get some airtime to say the plane was a UA plane, so nothing strange there, and many probably got fooled and said it was a UA plane based on the painted tail, which was infact blue, they just did not bother painting the rest of the plane blue for a reason, I assume they thought that there would be no close-up shots of the belly. But all the close-up shots show the plane had a grey belly, the same shade of grey that the towers had in the shadow.

There is 1 very common faked "still-image" on the web that shows a semi-high resolution picture of a UA plane about to hit the second tower, this picture has no source and even looks fake. We have 2 clear video sources showing the plane had a grey belly, this just shows that the conspirators had this image faked to give some credibility to the UA 175 theory.

goinghome2012
9th July 2012, 16:45
No planes
Missiles
No hijackers
Thanks for the post

humanalien
11th July 2012, 18:32
It's funny that with all the evidence they have about 9-11 being
a false flag attack, that on one is able to start a criminal investigation
into this.

Mulder
13th July 2012, 18:10
I've just listened to Kerry's latest radio show on 11 July 2012. She interviewed John Lear & John said there were holograms of planes and "invisible drones" were flying beside the holograms making the noise of a real plane through speakers! This is the "wildest" explanation of 9-11 I've heard, so listen for yourselves: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Project_Camelot_12.html

No planes
Missiles
No hijackers
Thanks for the post

Mulder
1st August 2012, 04:21
Here is another 9/11 video about the fuel in the building - indication a plane "really hit." I didn't want to start a new thread:

lmTIZG-MvzA

gooty64
1st August 2012, 04:34
Yeah Mulder, I agree that there were planes that hit the WTC.

No plane in Pennsylvania.
No plane at the Pentagon.
Military plane hit second WTC.

And what do you guys think about the first WTC plane? I don't know.
Just that Naday brothers footage from a distance of first WTC strike.