PDA

View Full Version : Anti cervical cancer jab for young teens



greybeard
18th July 2012, 22:04
This vaccination has been advertised on TV--- young girls in their naivety promoting it

This article shows just how strongly the medical profession promotes it.
Fertility rates are dropping in male and female----- I wonder why!!!!

Chris

http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/schools-refuse-anti-cervical-cancer-jab-on-religious-grounds.html

A number of schools are denying access to the potentially lifesaving vaccine for cervical cancer because they claim it goes against their religion. According to research by GP Magazine, 24 schools in 83 of the 152 Primary Care Trusts in England have opted out of the vaccination programme.

[Related: Cancer jabs good for whole community]

The schools that have refused the vaccine have claimed it goes against their ‘strict Christian principles’ because they disapprove of sex outside marriage. Most have also failed to inform local GPs who could offer the jab instead.

The vaccine, Cervarix, has been available in the UK since 2008. It protects girls against the HPV virus, which is thought to cause cervical cancer. More than 80 per cent of eligible teens in the UK since 2010 have received the vaccine.

The reasons schools gave for turning down the programme included "not in keeping with the school ethos", "pupils follow strict Christian principles, marry within their own community and do not practise sex outside marriage" and "the school does not want parents/students to feel pressured by peers or the school setting".

A school in London also recently revealed that it was cancelling the programme as it upset the girls so much it disrupted school lessons.

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has voiced its concerns that GPs are not being kept in the loop with vaccination programmes and take up rates and that this could put girls at risk in the future.
"GPs need to know of completion of vaccination courses,” explained Dr George Kassianos, immunisation lead at the RCGP.

"None of our immunisations are compulsory. We therefore must accept that some children or adults will not be vaccinated. It is hard to understand how immunisation against cancer can be rejected but that is how it is out there in the community."

Dr Richard Vautrey from the British medical Association added, “This is placing their children at risk in later life and should be challenged.”

nearing
18th July 2012, 23:41
Wow!

It's called Gardasil here and it's been linked to many girl's deaths and also neuro problems. It is NOT safe. AND on top of that, cervical cancer is not common and is is completely preventable by regular Pap screening!

conk
20th July 2012, 15:38
This vaccine is a vile, egregious attempt to poison young girls (and boys!). When doing the math to calculate the chances of getting this cancer you find the vaccine near worthless. But sadly not just worthless, but dangerous.

Lifebringer
20th July 2012, 15:43
This is the sterilization of the meek that will inherit the earth. They want to stop everyone from having babies, except the rich. In revelation they state the women and girls were made sterile.

It's time our bought out FDA is exposed for the poisonous letchers that they are.

it's time for "real people/humans to have control over these departments taht CARE FOR other humans on the planet, and not just their ticket in the D.U.M.B.S. Less people, the more powerful the control on who is left to serve them.

Elite crooks of control will steal your life if you let em.

Tarka the Duck
20th July 2012, 18:04
A fantastic young girl who works in a local tea shop at weekends has been suffering from terrible ill health for over 2 years now. She's had every test under the sun, and has been given just about every diagnosis you can think of that matched her symptoms only to have the results come back negative....she's even been prescribed morphine to manage the agonising abdominal pain she gets.

And now, guess what? Turns out 3 years ago she had the first of a course of 3 HPV vacinations...she's been told she is most likely unable to have children, and will probably suffer pain for the rest of her life. Her family is looking into suing the drug company.

It makes you so mad.

jackovesk
21st July 2012, 03:49
Wow!

It's called Gardasil here and it's been linked to many girl's deaths and also neuro problems. It is NOT safe. AND on top of that, cervical cancer is not common and is is completely preventable by regular Pap screening!

To add to that nearing

Gardasil vaccine to be free for boys for protection against human papilloma virus

July 13, 2012

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/02/03/1226261/834897-vaccine.jpg

IN a world first, Australian schoolboys will receive the Gardasil vaccine free from next year.

Federal Health Minister Tanya Plibersek's announcement yesterday comes five years after it was first funded for girls.

She said about 870,000 boys would receive Gardasil over the next four years under the national immunisation program, costing about $21 million.

The vaccine, which protects against four strains of the human papilloma virus, will be funded for 12 and 13-year-old boys, but Year 9 students will also be included in a two-year catch-up program.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/gardasil-vaccine-to-be-free-for-boys-for-protection-against-human-papilloma-virus/story-e6freon6-1226424380781

PS - I am no Doctor and don't mean to come across as niave, BUT I thought the Gardasil Vaccine was created especially for young girls to prevent/protect against the human papilloma virus. So would'nt that render the vaccine totally useless on Boys...:confused:


Currently, there is no HPV test recommended for men. The only approved HPV tests on the market are for screening women for cervical cancer.

http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-and-men.htm/

Anti-Cancer Vaccines..? More like Cancer CAUSING Vaccines...:yes4:

sigma6
26th July 2012, 03:01
The reality is, that vaccines LOWER your immunity. People who SURVIVE the vaccine in all likelihood would have survived contracting the virus in any event. And they are now in fact MORE VULNERABLE to the virus for having taken the vaccine. As hard as this must be for some to deal with if you do the research it's all there, and this type of CORPORATE PHARMA SCUMBAGGERY has been going on since the Rockefellers and other Elites got into the vaccine business... they have KNOWN about this since they started promoting vaccines going back to the 20's and 30's. If anyone is concerned about viruses, Urine therapy would be the most guaranteed way in the entire world to build your immunity and reverse any breakout of ANY VIRUS by using your body's own antigens and natural existing immune system... I wasn't even going to bother with references since this is so bloody obvious, but then remembered this site, where I was arguing this point with a bunch of TEFL Students on a website, so here is the page with the same argument... http://www.onlinetefl.com/tefl-chalkboard/caitrionam9/posts/9163-south-korea-vaccinations#comment_126323

Laurel
26th July 2012, 04:32
A few years ago, before all of the Gardasil side effects were made public, my daughter just about begged me to get this vaccination. They were actually talking about it in school and made it sound to these pre-teens that if you don't get the vaccine, you will get cervical cancer. All of her friends got it, but I put my foot down and said no. The risk of getting HPV *AND* getting cervical cancer from the HPV seem so much less unlikely than the risks possible from this (at that time) vaccine. I am so grateful that she didn't get the shot.

I'm not a crazy non-vaccine mom. She's had all her other required shots. Just this one didn't sit right with me. Same with the chicken pox vaccine.

Laurel
26th July 2012, 04:36
If anyone is concerned about viruses, Urine therapy would be the most guaranteed way in the entire world to build your immunity and reverse any breakout of ANY VIRUS by using your body's own antigens and natural existing immune system...

I can guarantee you that pre-teen and teen girls aren't going to drink pee

sigma6
26th July 2012, 11:10
It's a shame isn't it, when you think of all the people who have 'chosen' the permanent 'nap' instead of choosing life and knowledge. And how ironic ...opting for a needle which will increase their odds of having to make that decision. But that is the reality, and people will have to 'choose' to understand that ...or believe a TV commercial. And I can imagine how 'difficult' that must be for youngsters in some parts of the world. But that is what parents are for, (before they all absconded their responsibility to the state.)

I would ask you this, how many of those girls, if they found out they actually had the virus, and were provided with
John Armstrong's "Water of Life"
http://www.4shared.com/office/V4KCuTC-/Water_Of_Life_-_John_Armstrong.html and
Martha Christie's "Your Own Perfect Medicine"
http://www.4shared.com/office/Wmnrzp4E/Your_Own_Perfect_Medicine_-_Ma.html
and were instructed to actually read them would still refuse? I think you underestimate pre-teenage girls.

Another aspect, the fact that many are opting against the vaccine is a sign that they are waking up. The fact that they feel they have to 'hide behind' a religious position shows they are on the right track but still not completely aware of the legal game being played. Here is a hint of the underlying dynamic in a case from File no. 19556. 1986, Oct 7-10, 1988, Jan 28, pg 37 R. v Morgentaler:
"The decision whether or not to terminate a pregnancy is essentially a moral decision and in a free and democratic society the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of the state"
The point here is not a decision to terminate a pregnancy but what the Court said in regard of Freedom of Conscience; "the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of the state"

Con-science [kon-shuhns] noun
1. the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's own conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action; to follow the dictates of conscience.
2. the complex of ethical and moral principles that controls or inhibits the actions or thoughts of an individual

That is at least one reason why people should still read the Bible, especially the 1611 King James version, (and no, I am not promoting religion, but freedom of expression, and freedom of conscience) as that was originally authorized to be used in the 'court of law'... (one must know how to 'invoke' them)

conk
26th July 2012, 18:03
A few years ago, before all of the Gardasil side effects were made public, my daughter just about begged me to get this vaccination. They were actually talking about it in school and made it sound to these pre-teens that if you don't get the vaccine, you will get cervical cancer. All of her friends got it, but I put my foot down and said no. The risk of getting HPV *AND* getting cervical cancer from the HPV seem so much less unlikely than the risks possible from this (at that time) vaccine. I am so grateful that she didn't get the shot.

I'm not a crazy non-vaccine mom. She's had all her other required shots. Just this one didn't sit right with me. Same with the chicken pox vaccine.You should start your children on an extensive detox program. Almost ALL vaccines are detrimental to long term health. It's not just the bad science, it's the INTENTION behind the push for more. God doesn't even know what's in the vaccines. Only the worthless bastards who cook them up know and they ain't telling.