PDA

View Full Version : Urgent plea to all UK and Global Avalonians! (Fluoridation in the UK)



WHOMADEGOD
30th July 2012, 17:49
Hi all,

First off, this petition can be signed by ANYONE, ANYWHERE, it is not limited solely to the UK!

If you are you are on PA, we can assume you are awake enough to realise the problems we face with Fluoridation, in particular in our water supplies.

I am asking you to please give up literally 2 minutes of your time to stand and be counted against this illegal poisoning of our families and friends, by simply signing a petition.

The time has some to up the ante. A fluoridation consultation will be announced in the next few weeks by the DH so that we can all input into that process. In the meantime, together with postcards to the CEO of the NHS and a verbal assault on the CEO of Midlands and East Strategic Health Authority, a petition was launched today by Michael Clark of Birmingham Against Fluoridation.

http://www.change.org/petitions/your-water-is-poisonous

Please, please visit the site and sign the petition. You will be asked to circulate to all your Facebook Friends and this is a very effective way of getting the word out there and swell the number of signatures.

If enough signatures are received this could be the turning point we have been waiting for and will set a precedent for all of UK, and then pressurise other countries into following suit!

"Fluoridation of public water supplies is an act of mass medication without consent. Fluoride has been recognised as a neurotoxin yet it is used to prevent dental caries (Cavities), a medical condition. The government and health authority refuse to recognise the act of putting a class II poison into our drinking and bathing water as mass medication, which it clearly is. There is no validate scientific evidence to show that fluoride reduces cavities either in children or adults. The York review is held up bu the authorities as a definitive confirmation that fluoride does help stop cavities. The contents of this report have been selectively used by the authorities to achieve this confirmation and the authors of the York review (Several highly qualified academics) have written an open letter to government expressing their concerns at how their work has been manipulated to show results that are blatantly not true. Fluoride in the form of Hexafluorosilicic acid (an industril waste product containing arsenic) is the substance used by water companies. This chemical is highly toxic, requires an NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) suit to handle and , as more scientific studies on it emerge, may be responsible for a massive number of illnesses in our population. Sign this petition please and send a firm message to the authorities that we will not be poisoned by this noxious substance nor will we be mass medicated without consent."

We can do this , together.....

Blessings

Mark

onawah
30th July 2012, 18:01
Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ
Results from a very important study from Harvard were just published.
See http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/24/idUS127920+24-Jul-2012+PRN20120724

Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ - Published in Federal Gov't Journal

Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:45am EDT

Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ - Published in Federal Gov't Journal

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, July 24, 2012

NEW YORK, July 24, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Harvard University researchers' review of fluoride/brain studies concludes "our results support the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposures on children's neurodevelopment." It was published online July 20 in Environmental Health Perspectives, a US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' journal (1), reports the NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF)

"The children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ than those who lived in low fluoride areas," write Choi et al.

Further, the EPA says fluoride is a chemical "with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity."

Fluoride (fluosilicic acid) is added to US water supplies at approximately 1 part per million attempting to reduce tooth decay.

Water was the only fluoride source in the studies reviewed and was based on high water fluoride levels. However, they point out research by Ding (2011) suggested that low water fluoride levels had significant negative associations with children's intelligence.

Choi et al. write, "Although fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in animal models and acute fluoride poisoning causes neurotoxicity in adults, very little is known of its effects on children's neurodevelopment. They recommend more brain/fluoride research on children and at individual-level doses.

"It's senseless to keep subjecting our children to this ongoing fluoridation experiment to satisfy the political agenda of special-interest groups," says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President. "Even if fluoridation reduced cavities, is tooth health more important than brain health? It's time to put politics aside and stop artificial fluoridation everywhere," says Beeber.

After reviewing fluoride toxicological data, the NRC reported in 2006, "It's apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain."

Choi's team writes, "Fluoride readily crosses the placenta. Fluoride exposure to the developing brain, which is much more susceptible to injury caused by toxicants than is the mature brain, may possibly lead to damage of a permanent nature."

Fluoride accumulates in the body. Even low doses are harmful to babies, the thyroid, kidney patients and heavy water-drinkers. There are even doubts about fluoridation's effectiveness (2). New York City Legislation is pending to stop fluoridation. Many communities have already stopped.

Infant formula when mixed with fluoridated water delivers 100-200 times more fluoride than breastmilk. (3)

More information on fluoride's impact on the brain is here.

Contact: Paul Beeber, JD, 516-433-8882 nyscof@aol.com

http://www.fluoridation.webs.com

http://www.FluorideAction.Net

SOURCE NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.

Bill Ryan
30th July 2012, 18:06
-------

Some readers may not have seen this thread, from almost exactly two years ago:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story&highlight=fluoride






Fluoride - a conversation with an insider who knows the real story


I was sent the following report yesterday by e-mail, and am reposting it here with full permission. It could not be more important.

******************





I would like to commend you on your story (20th of July) re. the Gulf "spill" and the alternative media's reporting of it. You reminded me that I have to keep checking the facts. Like you, I was very concerned. Thank you. Here's my story below.

I wanted to give you something in return (I first had this posted at Ken Adachi's Educate-Yourself.org

http://educate-yourself.org/lte/lettherebepeaceonearth22dec09.shtml


I wanted to tell you of a real conversation that I had with a head of one of the main NHS (National Health Services) in the UK. This particular body is instrumental in advising… sorry, “INSTRUCTING” the water companies to fluoridate our water.

I had been doing some research on Fluoride, its uses, toxicity and the general negative affect that it has on us humans etc. Having been scared half out of my wits, I contacted (called) my local water supplier to ask why they were putting poison in the water.

The female customer services agent was somewhat aghast & surprised at my statement, however, she was also surprised to find that her "Water Company" did not have any reference on their website about Fluoride being in the water. She then told me that her computer was directing her to a “technical services manager” who would be able to answer my questions.

I thanked her and was put through to what sounded like a man in a very large and empty room. This guy came right to the point and said that they did what they were told and if I wanted any further information, I should call the SHA (Strategic Health Authority), as they gave the orders.

At this point Bill, I do not want to name the person I spoke with; but put simply, you can’t get much higher than this person…

I looked this person up and called their office; I was surprised to be put straight through to them. I asked if I could have three minutes of their time and I was granted this. My question was direct and to the point.

Why, given the evident toxicity of Fluoride and the many supporting independent papers on the dangers of consuming it, are your group instructing the "Water Company" to put it in our drinking water? This is the answer and subsequent conversation to the best of my memory:

“Do you drink alcohol?” (I knew what was coming – or did I?)

“Yes, I do… but I choose to drink it,” I smugly replied.

There was a brief silence, and then the bombshell:

“You are correct. Fluoride is a poison and should not be in the water system, full stop."

UH!!! My jaw hit my desk. For the next 15 minutes we spoke candidly about its dangers; the con of how it has been sold to us (forced on us). The details of the early tests in the 1930s and how this information was seriously floored (and still is).

I was told to refer to a recent paper in the BMJ (British Medical Journal) which (I was told) quite clearly demonstrated that it’s a poison and should be removed from the water immediately, as it's “hazardous to health.” This person knew their stuff !

I asked, "why then, if you know all this, do you continue to instruct the Water Companies to put it in the water?"

Their response: “The decisions are made in the 'deepest darkest recesses of Parliament', and we have 'no say' in the matter. We are just following orders, as are the Water Companies.”

My final question was as to what do I do? I was told to get as many people together as I possibly could and "lobby Parliament."

I thanked them for their time, and closed the conversation feeling very concerned… as I am today. I filter ALL of my water using the latest technology. It’s difficult to escape Fluoride over here as its in most of our bottled water too.

This conversation happened 16 months ago. I was scared to talk about it before, but things have now changed.

Andrew
30th July 2012, 18:12
A familiar sign at every water treatment facility in England ... Water Treatment Works :noidea:

SKAWF
30th July 2012, 18:15
so whats the point in signing a petition?

why are we not suing them for trespass and breach of trust?

its not like we dont have the evidence.

also as has been said, the state, cannot prescribe medications
a doctor can only do it if you go to him with a medical complaint.


i dont wish to belittle or derail the thread.
i am 100% with you on how important this subject is...

but ime, petitions dont go anywhere near far enough.
its a way of taking mass opoosition to something,
and lumping it into a format that can easily be ignored.

bubbling away under my surface are the preparations for a number of civil court cases.
damages, trespass, breach of trust etc.

i feel that i have been given the keys to the legal system. its mine to do with what i want.

and i'm all out of bubblegum.

jc71
30th July 2012, 18:15
Thanks WMG,

Signed just now.

Regards,

J

golden lady
30th July 2012, 20:00
Signed, I just hate this lack of choice.

Elly
30th July 2012, 20:59
A member has already posted on the Fluoride thread the link of a very good site where to start a research on the subject. Here it is again: http://www.fluoridealert.org/.

I find this article about the history of fluoridation very interesting (although I cannot seem to find the author): http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=14949. Here's an excerpt:

At the end of World War II, the US government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. The German chemists told Perkins of a scheme which they had devised during the war and had been adapted by the German General Staff. The German chemists explained of their attempt to control the population in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water with sodium fluoride, a tactic used in German and Russian prisoner of war camps to make the prisoners "stupid and docile"(Stephen 1995). Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries because it was found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain, making it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom and causing the individual to become more docile towards authority. Fluoride remains one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances known, and is contained in twenty-five percent of the major tranquilizers. It may not seem surprising that Hitler’s regime practiced the concept of mind control through chemical means, but the American military continued Nazi research, exploring techniques to incapacitate an enemy or medicate an entire nation. As stated in the Rockerfeller Report, a Presidential briefing on CIA activities, "the drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behavior"(Stephen 1995).

--- post edit ---

Wade Frazier's site (can't believe I missed this one): http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm#compulsory

onawah
31st July 2012, 23:28
so whats the point in signing a petition?

why are we not suing them for trespass and breach of trust?

I can't speak for England, but in San Diego, California, a suit has been filed on the grounds that the government is drugging us without our permission, since fluoride has been designated as a drug.
The Fluoride Action Network has been successful in getting communities in Canada to reverse their fluoridation mandates, and I read that when they feel they have established the trend there firmly enough, they will begin to do the same in the US.
Meanwhile, in the US, word is getting out and recently Albuquerque and Santa Fe said NO to fluoride.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_25854.cfm
If it can't be accomplished from the top down, they it must be done from the bottom up, it seems.

ghostrider
1st August 2012, 00:17
Our ancestors drank from streams, now we need our water treated. hmmm ? What did they do before water treatment plants ? They lived longer and were stronger and their memories were better. Native Americans never needed to treat water.