View Full Version : BBC Olympics: 'it is The New World Order' 30 July 2012 - Naked NWO Propaganda!
ExomatrixTV
1st August 2012, 21:05
ujtPCbna2Rk
~first they (amongst others BBC) were in denial, now it is sold to us as "cool" ... look at the athletes behaving like cheesy sheeple ... I wonder how many of them know what "The New World Order" really stands for ...
~it is like living in the 1920s & 1930s again where the Nazis promoted themselves too ... to the world!
John Kuhles
Maia Gabrial
2nd August 2012, 00:17
There you have it, folks! Proof positive spoken on Lame Stream....
Is that what the Olympics is supposed to be about - promoting the NWO?
spuddie
2nd August 2012, 01:57
ujtPCbna2Rk
~first they (amongst others BBC) were in denial, now it is sold to us as "cool" ... look at the athletes behaving like cheesy sheeple ... I wonder how many of them know what "The New World Order" really stands for ...
~it is like living in the 1920s & 1930s again where the Nazis promoted themselves too ... to the world!
John Kuhles
I watched this BBC Olympics transmission, live, John. All of it.
First of all let me say: "Bloody well done you GBR Gymnastics crew!"
Were you to have posted the full interview, and perhaps followed the event as it happened, it would have been evident that the presenter was referring to the fact that the British Artistic Gymnastics Team, having just captured their first Olympic medal EVER, a Bronze, were challenging the established dominance of Japan, USA, eastern Europe and, latterly, China in the event... and in the gymnastics world as a whole.
She used the term 'new world order' (notice no caps) to describe this state of affairs in its GENERIC sense, not 'New World Order' which, as we all know, is the name given to the controlling Globalist elite.
Frankly, John, I find every point you you make in your post to be utter nonsense.
Your comment about the athletes 'behaving like cheesy sheeple', is particularly snide and baseless. The athletes were patently behaving just as you would expect a bunch of young men to behave when thrust before a microphone and into the spotlight on live national TV for the first time in their short lives. They acquitted themselves admirably in my view.
As for your suggestion that 'it' (presumably meaning the BBC's programme material) is something akin to Nazi propaganda... well, that's just unthinking tosh. Sure, the BBC puts its own complexion on affairs... what channel, mainstream or 'alternative', doesn't have its political stance?... but I would say that in comparison to stateside channels, it's relatively non-partisan.
In reading your post, John, I'm reminded of a saying: "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
Spartacus
2nd August 2012, 06:09
Well said spuddie. Many hammers here - never the sharpest tools in the box.
ExomatrixTV
2nd August 2012, 11:54
Dear spuddie I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE:
~she could have said: "we live in a new world" or "new era" or "new times" or "different world" but "O R D E R" ? that has been used by the Nazis: "Neue Welt Ordnung" as a slogan ... just like the Masonic slogan on the dollar bill: Novus Ordo Seclorum later promoted by Bush Senior 'New World Order" speech September 11,1990 precise 11 years later we had --911 attack-- now we live again 11 years later of 911
study: New World Order Judged+Verdict!:
mbCHUGbrsQI
markpierre
2nd August 2012, 13:10
It was difficult to hear that phrase used in that context, associated with achievement and benevolence. It's almost like a slap. I doubt that her mind really contains more than
her professionalism and striving to seem genuine. Her indoctrination would be pretty superficial. She wouldn't know what she was doing. Maybe she was just being clever.
New world order is a generic term now. Just another over and misused part of the language. That's very unfortunate.
I don't know, sometimes these guys are so extremely over the top obvious and camp. The Republican nomination campaign, unbelievable.
And sometimes so nearly invisible that you can't miss the genius of it.
I don't feel a temptation to be fooled, but i know that everything both true and untrue is a message to me personally. I have that advantage.
And I can see how easily it can be defended by any reasonable mind as perfectly lovely and desirable, not just the blank minds.
But the blank ones are a worry.
spuddie
2nd August 2012, 14:09
~she could have said: "we live in a new world" or "new era" or "new times" or "different world" but "O R D E R" ? that has been used by the Nazis: "Neue Welt Ordnung" as a slogan ... just like the Masonic slogan on the dollar bill: Novus Ordo Seclorum later promoted by Bush Senior 'New World Order" speech September 11,1990 precise 11 years later we had --911 attack-- now we live again 11 years later of 911
Yes, she could have said something slightly different, John, but in the context of the discussion, the term, used generically, made the point perfectly: the world order, in Gymnastics, was, by Team GB's achievement, new.
And now you want to conflate that clearly unscripted, innocent remark not only with the Nazis but with the nefarious activities of the Freemasons and even the CIA and the Mossad (who, as we know, won Gold and Silver in the New York 2001 Nine-Eleven event).
Can I respectfully suggest, John, that you give yourself and your overly paranoid mind a well-earned rest... go on vacation somewhere really, really nice.
Actually, I hear there are still some Olympic Games tickets available. Heck, you might even bag one for the much-touted-on-here London 2012 Disclosure event.
Now wouldn't that be a ticket for anyone's 'Conspiracies' scrap book?
ExomatrixTV
2nd August 2012, 15:12
spuddie I do what I want whenever I want ... if I make a mistake ... so what? ... that is part of being human ... and yes I back down if I see I made a mistake and stand corrected ... but in this case your attempt to use cheap name callings like "your overly paranoid mind" has backfired at you bro
~everybody can be victims of mis-information misrepresentations, human errors, believing lies, believing false accusations, claim of a "hoax" can also be an hoax, people being trapped in narrow-minded views-perceptions, having not enough time to verify all that is claimed, being part of a "group behaviour" with self-censorship, being limited because of others dictating you how to be, having only a FRACTION of the whole, demanding others to follow your "conclusions" - "truths" or vice versa
John
Maia Gabrial
2nd August 2012, 21:47
It sounds like she and Lame Stream are still pushing the NWO agenda. Huh, go figure. When people are against it and there's still people like her still pushing it, gotta wonder about them. No way to mistake that comment for anything else, spuddie. It was clearly New World Order. Gee, New then?
BTW, it's not necessary to be insulting, spuddie. Theres' nothing wrong with what he said since many people agree with him. There is alot of negativity attached to NWO. Hint: It's not a good thing.
Are you going to tell me to take a vacation, too?
Maia Gabrial
4th August 2012, 14:57
New World Order=new world order=NWO. How are those different, spuddie?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.