photo anomaly

[iceni tribe]

this image was given to me last night .it was taken friday from the beach over looking the wash in norfolk , the photo was taken randomly while playing about with a new camera phone , she wasn't aware of the image until she reviewed her photos.

we are all quite baffled to come up with an explanation , if anyone can throw us a bone , please be my guest. scroll right for image.

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx171/naf09_2010/003.jpg

my guess was a leaf , but this wasn't excepted soooooooooooo ?

[watchZEITGEISTnow]

looks like a flag to me :p

[bluestflame]

possibly as the veils between dimensions thin these things will happen , could be a leaf , looks very flag like or even a length of material such as a sheet or a veil

[RunningDeer]

I enlarged the photo. My guess is a kerchief/scarf out kite flying for the day. :wave:



http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Calz/kerchief2.JPGhttp://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Calz/kerchief.JPG

[conk]

It's a holy cloth. God is trying to wash the chemtrails from the sky.

[Sidney]

This looks inter-dimensional to me. There is another area below the main object about an inch below on the very right edge of the photo. so that for me debunks the scarf idea, but who knows

[spiritguide]

The blown up image is toroidal in shape and denotes energy of sorts. Toroidal energies transform don't they? Just my perception.

:peace:

[ghostrider]

does look like a flag.

[sirdipswitch]

They are Sylph's, or Sky Angles, as some call them. They help clean up our skies, and some have even come here from Jupiter, and are called Jupiter Giants, and will stretch all the way across the sky. If you talk with them, as I do, they will keep your skies clean as they do for me. I tell them they are beautifull, and That I really appreciate the good work that they do in keeping my sky clean from all of the chemtrails. Since I first started talking to them, 5 years ago, I have had very few chemtrails, and the ones that I do get, are"cleaned up" immediately. I talk to them every time I go outside. They really love praise. They always look just as the one in this photo, and are usually the highest clouds in the sky, and appear as brite white whispy looking clouds just like this one. They can appear in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes they actually look like angles up there, with head body, arms, legs, and wings. If you pay attention, and start to praise them, and keep watching, you will attract more to you, and see what I am talking about. When I walk out, I say; "Beautifull sky, Thank you Sylph's, you do such a great job at keeping my skies nice and pretty." And of course, tell them you Love them. And then watch closely, for you may even see one or two of them "Move", in answer to you. If more people would praise them for their great work, they would bring more Giants here, from Jupiter, to help clean up our skies.

When one goes deep enough down the rabbit hole, way down below the lies, that we have been programed with, one will start to see the absolute beauty, that surounds us.

I Love you all, Unconditionally.
sirdipswitch

[spiritguide]

Also noticed on the blown up picture that on the left side the infra red spectrum is ingoing and at the other end of the torroid the ultra violet spectrum is emitted. Is this a process of reflective light or absorption? What are the frequencies of ultra violet and beyond vs infra red? Let there be light!

SDS, your perceptional dialog resonates.

[Sidney]

Here is what I see. first impression...... an Inter-dimensional Woman in a long hooded flowing gown, out having a nice stroll around the universe. I have a pretty open mind, and i am just not seeing a flag, as i also see the energy signatures around it.

[centreoflight]

They are Sylph's, or Sky Angles, as some call them. They help clean up our skies, and some have even come here from Jupiter, and are called Jupiter Giants, and will stretch all the way across the sky. If you talk with them, as I do, they will keep your skies clean as they do for me. I tell them they are beautifull, and That I really appreciate the good work that they do in keeping my sky clean from all of the chemtrails. Since I first started talking to them, 5 years ago, I have had very few chemtrails, and the ones that I do get, are"cleaned up" immediately. I talk to them every time I go outside. They really love praise. They always look just as the one in this photo, and are usually the highest clouds in the sky, and appear as brite white whispy looking clouds just like this one. They can appear in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes they actually look like angles up there, with head body, arms, legs, and wings. If you pay attention, and start to praise them, and keep watching, you will attract more to you, and see what I am talking about. When I walk out, I say; "Beautifull sky, Thank you Sylph's, you do such a great job at keeping my skies nice and pretty." And of course, tell them you Love them. And then watch closely, for you may even see one or two of them "Move", in answer to you. If more people would praise them for their great work, they would bring more Giants here, from Jupiter, to help clean up our skies.

When one goes deep enough down the rabbit hole, way down below the lies, that we have been programed with, one will start to see the absolute beauty, that surounds us.

I Love you all, Unconditionally.
sirdipswitch

Thank you sirdipswitch,

Sylph is a word to remember. I am open to go into this adventure.
I also Love you all, Uncanditionally
Namaste'
George

[RunningDeer]

I say flag rather than scarf, now.
http://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii610/WhiteCrowBlackDeer/Calz/1-1.jpg
http://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii610/WhiteCrowBlackDeer/Calz/2-1.jpghttp://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii610/WhiteCrowBlackDeer/Calz/3-1.jpg

[iceni tribe]

Thanks for the input , i'm leaning towards a flag now , i will go and have a look where the photo was taken tomorrow , and get back to you.

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Looks like part of the wing from a Gargoyle. ;)

[Sapphire]

http://s10.postimage.org/hkel2n56d/assassins_creed_screensaver_228521_1238908081.jpg (http://postimage.org/image/hkel2n56d/) ;)

[Alien Ramone]

this image was given to me last night .it was taken friday from the beach over looking the wash in norfolk , the photo was taken randomly while playing about with a new camera phone , she wasn't aware of the image until she reviewed her photos.

we are all quite baffled to come up with an explanation , if anyone can throw us a bone , please be my guest. scroll right for image.

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx171/naf09_2010/003.jpg

my guess was a leaf , but this wasn't excepted soooooooooooo ?

Maybe it's a pod:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Milkweed-in-seed.jpg/400px-Milkweed-in-seed.jpg


http://negociatas.vivyanefernando.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/invasion-of-the-body-snatchers-pod1-486x1024.jpg

[nonesuch]

we are all quite baffled to come up with an explanation , if anyone can throw us a bone , please be my guest. scroll right for image.


I don't mean to step on any toes, but I think what we're seeing is a doctored photo. The pixelation around the close-up of the anomalous figure below is standard when cutting an image from one source and pasting it into another, then unsuccessfully trying to erase the original (darker or lighter) edge around the pasted object. Its difficult to get it right, but it doesn't matter if a photo will only be displayed at regular size that allows no possibility of detecting the artifacts around such a small object.

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa421/bf933/da1bca6f.png


Below is the same photo darkened in photoshop and the pixelation at the edge of the figure shows more distinctly. This effect appears nowhere else in the photo.

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa421/bf933/1b02707d.png


This is a classic cut and paste error. Even taking into account the low quality of some cell phone cameras, I still can't see a reason for all the mess around the figure when it shows up nowhere else...even if the phone cam were a dud. The resolution differences between the photo from which the object was cut and the photo it was pasted into could also contribute to the effect.

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa421/bf933/b710e456.png


I wanted to make sure that the high contrast between the figure and its new background (darkish blue clouds and white sky) was not causing this. So I looked for similar effects elsewhere. Below, look at the darkened clouds to the left of the figure. They too contrast with the white sky but there are no 'brush marks' at their juncture like those that surround the pasted figure.

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa421/bf933/af1429bc.png


Finally, below is a close-up of the wispy cloud on the far left taken from the darkened version of the full photo. This image is displayed with equal darkness and resolution as the photo located second down from the top in this post. Notice how smooth the transitions from clouds/wisps to sky are in this close-up, vs. that of the figure against its background. You can barely see any pixels here. (I couldn't see any even when I darkened or lightened this image).

As I said before, I think the 'sky' photo was shot at a higher resolution than the photo of the inserted figure. When displayed in the composite photo in the OP, the high resolution of the sky photo interpolates more smoothly than the lower resolution from the original the figure was taken from.

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa421/bf933/238827ee.png[


I have not yet seen a cloud sylph, but I would enjoy seeing one. I will begin looking up more often over the next weeks as a result of this post. I've seen orbs, but no sylphs. Would the cloud formation we're seeing constitute what some would call a sylph, even with the visitor in the far right of the photo?

[Wiremu2011]

Looks like a witch with an invisible face wearing purple drape hoodie making her way to the "ceremony"..lol

[eni-al]

Pretty certain its a flag on a flag pole, with the sun light bursting through.

[sirdipswitch]

oops!!! I just had one a them head slapping moments. chuckle chuckle. NOW I SEE. Had to move my pitcher over. Don't have a clue what that thing is, other than maybe somethin on the camera lens. In my other post, I was talkin about the cloud formation. Those are Sylphs. The white whispy looking clouds you see, above all the rest of the clouds.

[pugwash84]

looks like a lady on a sail boat to me

[jagman]

I think it is two hands in the praying postion.

[jagman]

My son josh say's it looks like a dorsal fin

[RunningDeer]

My son josh say's it looks like a dorsal fin

And WhiteCrowBlackDeer says hello to Josh. :wave:

[Eram]

oops!!! I just had one a them head slapping moments. chuckle chuckle. NOW I SEE. Had to move my pitcher over. Don't have a clue what that thing is, other than maybe somethin on the camera lens. In my other post, I was talkin about the cloud formation. Those are Sylphs. The white whispy looking clouds you see, above all the rest of the clouds.


Never heard about them before Sirdipswitch.
Thanks for mentioning them.

I googled them and this is a picture I found.
http://www.worldofheaven.com/messages_img/3b6d649420a35b94ae29b6974c15f76a/Sylph1_en_0.jpg

Just like something I saw in the clouds a week ago.

source (http://www.worldofheaven.com/categories.php?mc=6&muuid=3b6d649420a35b94ae29b6974c15f76a&l=es&sid=257d480ab911f4356678c902415a2732)

[iceni tribe]

ok all bets are off now the result is now in.

although friday we had a laugh trying to figger this thing out , and we did come up with all sorts of crazy ideas , especially as the night wore on , i have now gone down to the beach and took a photo of what she captured on her phone .

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx171/naf09_2010/001-1.jpg

yep a blooming flag , i reckon she used the panoramic view on her camera and although it wasn't in her view finder it came out on her photo.

cheers

[RunningDeer]

Now that's darn funny....iceni tribehttp://www.pic4ever.com/images/bliss.gif


http://static.artfagcity.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/orsonclapping.gif


"Occam's razor states that the simplest theory is often the best, suggesting that nature uses the simplest means to an end. Occam's razor is often used to reduce the number of competing theories under discussion, but it is important to remember that it does not actually rule out a theory, as you need empirical evidence to prove or disprove something."

Empirical = verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or logic



ok all bets are off now the result is now in.

[Ultima Thule]

Just for the record, the pixelation "error" in the borders of the flag is due to the basic algorithm of jpg image - jpg is compressed by making 8 by 8 pixel areas and it is described by an algorithm as best as possible. On clouds and other diffuse areas the pixelation won´t be visible, but anywhere with a sharp transition in the image this will be visible. Less so, if a higher quality of jpg compression is used.

UT

[nonesuch]

Just for the record, the pixelation "error" in the borders of the flag is due to the basic algorithm of jpg image - jpg is compressed by making 8 by 8 pixel areas and it is described by an algorithm as best as possible. On clouds and other diffuse areas the pixelation won´t be visible, but anywhere with a sharp transition in the image this will be visible. Less so, if a higher quality of jpg compression is used.

UT

Thanks for your comments.

I'm familiar with jpeg compression with its variations in pixelation based on contrast, depth of compression and other factors. I've been working in Photoshop since it was first released decades ago (that sure dates me!) when GIF's were King, and I can usually spot photo manipulation because I've done enough of it myself for compositional changes to my own photos.

This is off-topic, but I'll state it briefly for the record.

I don't take online photographic evidence at face value. There is blatantly compromised or outright falsely sourced photographic 'evidence' online that people take seriously and run with. This is particularly so in the alternative community where unusual, hidden or suspicious events and claims are investigated , focused on and appreciated, but for which there is often no hard evidence. In that atmosphere, anything photographic is jumped on as possible/probable proof of either a true, imagined or deliberately fabricated claim.

In this thread, a flagpole was thought to be a sylph or some other phenomenon by some. While I still see classic signs of photo manipulation around the figure, it's inconsequential at this point. eceni tribe's latest comment, based on further research, says that the figure in the OP is a flagpole, so a flagpole it is. I'm a seasoned photographer and take in visual details around me. I wouldn't have missed a flagpole sitting on top of a building I was standing near when I shot that photo, but apparently whoever took the photo wasn't paying attention to her environment. That is entirely possible since the original photographer was playing with a new cell phone and was probably distracted by that.

[Sidney]

I KNEW it was a flag. ROTFLMAO:p



You HAVE to give us credit for having wonderful imaginations.:wizard: