Kerry's photos

[Cristian]

So I was drinking coffee and checking things out , and I saw the latest blog post from Kerry. I was like ...cool , finally an entry that is backed by some sort of evidence.

However I have to admit I dont know what to make of this.

The photos were taken here http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/Home.aspx .



I apologize for the delay in posting the space photos (now posted below) of the 3 incoming objects per my prior post. I am working with my web team to get these posted here.

In the meantime, according to my source:

They wrote: What you want to examine is the blue lines that highlight the objects. There are 3 photos that display the objects incoming and a focused blow-up of one of them. Note that there are scattered reflections taken by the camera...so only the bright blue sphere is the 'real' one and the others are artifacts of how this was done. The size is huge. You can duplicate this yourself off of the urls in the photos.

Estimated distance is 80 light years away...

http://projectcamelotportal.com/images/wwt060409_260137.jpg
http://projectcamelotportal.com/images/wwt060953_241026-a.jpg
http://projectcamelotportal.com/images/wwt061507_205618-2.jpg
http://projectcamelotportal.com/images/wwt061810_210532-1.jpg

[Cjay]

When I first saw these images, my initial thought was "blue kachina" but I have read that has already been and gone.

[Lifebringer]

Wow! Cool, thanks for posting. A few months ago I had gone to Googlesky and when i didn't infrared, i could zoom in on some of the objects, since then I haven't been able to get too close. NASA? Possibly blocking the images, but I showed my nephew those same objects before they blocked it and it changed him to where he became more spiritual and although he's the seer of the family, he's in wonder of what's to come, because he knows it's something wonderful, and WE better have our house in order.

Beautiful dreamers, wake unto me, starlight and due drops are waiting for thee.

[HURRITT ENYETO]

I don't read Kerry's Blog, so don't know what she 'claims' these are, but if she claims they are some kind of craft or ANY physical object for that matter, then that is actually quite insulting.
They are artefacts from the imaging process. I have seen them many times.



Hurritt

[Tommy]

I don't read Kerry's Blog, so don't know what she 'claims' these are, but if she claims they are some kind of craft or ANY physical object for that matter, then that is actually quite insulting.
They are artefacts from the imaging process. I have seen them many times.



Hurritt

Well, at least you can read the OP before replying. Where do you see the word "craft"? The whole point of reporting is for people to put on their research-cap and do some digging. What I see here is just another example of uneducated borderline rude posting which people in this community should be past by now, if they expect to get anywhere.

It would be great if you could substantiate your claim about artifacts and how you differentiate what is and what is not. I am sure many members would find such information useful.

[Lifebringer]

Still installing last programs and add-ons.

[Lifebringer]

These blue orbs are real. I've seen them under the Google.com/sky with and without the infrared, and until recently you could zoom in very close on google, but now it's blocked out or the function simply won't zoom in any further.

I showed a nephew I told you back in April, before the Venus Transition because I specifically remember the time, there was a birth in my family on the 20 of May and I was constantly showing others of the blue orbed enormous objects in our solar system coming in through LEO.

I wish people wouldn't be so closed minded at what others experience, even if you've experienced the same thing, please allow others to do their own feeling on something. Trying to shut down an open mind is a no no, eh?

They have to be able to seek through their inner voice, WE are not their inner voice, but fellow travelers, discovering information that was hidden and didn't allow for proper processing of the truth to look at the big picture. LIFE, LOVE, HAPPINESS, AND SPIRITUAL JOY.

[spiritguide]

Sorry folks, set up for dualistic problems here. Any perception on this subject is subjective and has no basis except visual observation. So it is evident that both pro's and con's will arise regarding this issue. Why would one decry one's perception because it does not conform to anothers? Any and all perceptions are valid and should be accepted until proven false. IMHO

[Wind]

When I first saw these images, my initial thought was "blue kachina" but I have read that has already been and gone.

Many people say that the Blue Kachina was Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9. If I have understood correctly, the Red Kachina will be our Sun gone wild.

[RMorgan]

Hey folks,

Like Hurritt said, these are most probably telescope/mirror artifacts. You can even see part of the mirror structure, forming a crosshair like shape.

You can find many weird examples of similar artifacts on the web.

cpwkiqbJQvY

Again, Kerry isn´t helping to preserve her credibility.

Honestly, I can´t understand why she doesn´t make a further research before posting such stuff.

Cheers,

Raf.

[HURRITT ENYETO]

Well, at least you can read the OP before replying. Where do you see the word "craft"?

Sorry, I used the word craft instead of Kerry's 'objects' (I fail to see how that changes the overall message of these being anything but Camera artefacts?)


The whole point of reporting is for people to put on their research-cap and do some digging.

Exactly.If people DID put on their research cap, we wouldn't be here discussing perfectly normal imaging artefacts.


What I see here is just another example of uneducated borderline rude posting which people in this community should be past by now, if they expect to get anywhere.

That's exactly what I thought., except i used the word insulting instead of rude :)


It would be great if you could substantiate your claim about artifacts and how you differentiate what is and what is not. I am sure many members would find such information useful.

No problem, here ya go!

http://www.2012hoax.org/local--files/google-sky/google_sky2.png
That is the underside of the telescope at Palomar. It is an image that appears on the original photographic plates, and is a result of a double-exposure or light leak onto the plate. The plate was not discarded because it was felt that the data was not obscured enough, and was too valuable to discard. There are several of these in the DSS data, along with some other interesting imaging artifacts.

Note the 4 struts, in all of Kerry's photos, Kerry's photos are from a slightly different angle, hence the square imager being visible in the centre.
From wikipedia
The term Digitized Sky Survey originally referred to the publication in 1994 of a digital version of an all-sky photographic atlas. For the northern sky, the National Geographic Society - Palomar Observatory Sky Survey provided almost all of the source data. For the southern sky, the Southern Sky Atlas and its Equatorial Extension (together known as the SERC-J) and the southern Galactic Plane survey (SERC-V), from the UK Schmidt Telescope at Anglo-Australian Observatory, were used. The publication of a digital version of these photographic collections has subsequently become known as the First Generation DSS.

It was probably Palomar who's data was used to create the above images. It was Palomar who's image i used in my photo.
How i differentiate a real object and an artefact is quite simple. If i can clearly see the 4 supporting struts of the imager, its probably an artefact :)
I realise that it was admitted in the op that most of them were artefacts, IMHO they are all artefacts.



Hurritt

ps posted before i saw RMorgans response above.

[Tommy]

Thanks, this helps a lot.

I have relayed the remarks to Kerry so we can get them to the astronomer who sent them originally, hopefully we will get an update on it.

Cheers

[Cristian]

yup...there is a good chance those are artefacts.

However I learned the hard way to trust women's intuition and my gut feeling. Maybe (probably) all of those things are artefacts...but something around this subject feels very real to me .Hmm...

[RMorgan]

Thanks, this helps a lot.

I have relayed the remarks to Kerry so we can get them to the astronomer who sent them originally, hopefully we will get an update on it.

Cheers

Hey mate,

A have a few things in my mind:

a) This guy (her source) isn´t a real astronomer. He´s just pretending to be one, because an astronomer should know and understand such phenomenon.

b)He´s an astronomer, but a terrible amateur one.

c)He´s an astronomer who´s feeding her disinformation for some reason.

Anyway, I don´t think he´s a reliable source of information. Such artifacts have been discussed several times on several internet forums. It´s easy to find detailed info about them on the internet.

I´ve said this countless times here. Kerry should be more selective with her sources. They´ve been feeding her an incredible amount of BS during the last couple of years.

Cheers,

Raf.

[pugwash84]

beautiful pictures x

[Cartomancer]

Gee Whiz. It would have been cool if someone had pointed this out to Kerry before she posted it on here site. This really kind of makes her look bad though she obviously means well.

I guess one of the things we suffer from in the alternative thought community is that everyone is trying to get the scoop and also get it ahead of everyone else. In the last year we have seen this time after time. Elenin. The Baltic Sea Anomaly. The asteroid that was actually a death star. The collapsing economy. The "Drake/Fulford/Wilcock material. Ever since 911 everyone wants to be the first to predict the next disaster and tell you all about it. The sad part about this one is that some are/were actually commenting as if this was a real "incoming object." I've been fooled before too. It happens to all of us at one point or another.

[RMorgan]

Gee Whiz. It would have been cool if someone had pointed this out to Kerry before she posted it on here site. This really kind of makes her look bad though she obviously means well.

I guess one of the things we suffer from in the alternative thought community is that everyone is trying to get the scoop and also get it ahead of everyone else. In the last year we have seen this time after time. Elenin. The Baltic Sea Anomaly. The asteroid that was actually a death star. The collapsing economy. The "Drake/Fulford/Wilcock material. Ever since 911 everyone wants to be the first to predict the next disaster and tell you all about it. The sad part about this one is that some are/were actually commenting as if this was a real "incoming object." I've been fooled before too. It happens to all of us at one point or another.

This is a problem indeed, my friend.

Every journalist, alternative or not, should cross check and investigate his potential information before publishing something. This is not an option, it´s a duty.

Those who don´t do that quickly fall into the sensationalist genre and lose credibility.

This paid subscriber policy isn´t healthy for serious journalists. It ends up forcing them to think about quantity, not quality.

It´s much better to publish 6 well researched quality articles a year than publishing 24 unfounded stories.

Raf.

[Vitalux]

Chris82

Thank you for posting this, but you will discover that Kerry Cassidy should be taken with a grain of salt.
Last week for example she was telling all her fans that the USA and China were at war with aliens from outer space and war ships off the coast of California were in battle.:ufo: :doh:
Myself, whenever I encounter anything produced by Kerry I assume it is just fiction :drama: and entertain myself in seeing if there might be any facts in her statements.

[Cristian]

Vitalux ...I do read Kerry's blog like a fiction story. But she's not stupid and she has tons of connections .

This is my first copy/paste from her blog, and only because I had four cups of coffee this morning , and also because I do feel something important in her post. Even if all of those "incoming objects" are artefacts...something triggered me..I dont know what.

[ghostrider]

Just remember all information once it's on the web it is sanitized. keeping truth hidden among endless mountains of noise. Learn for yourself, go observe the moon , it is being tipped over as are we . something is in our solar system making problems for everything from the sun to the moon to the earth to the climate to the air, to the animals , to our own emotions/thoughts.

[Star Tsar]

Look we should'nt attack Kerry she brings us info she feels is pertinent.
Its easy to forget the excellent info that been brought forward in the past by Projects Camelot & Avalon.
Be honest she is just one lady how can she bring over 3 hours of QUALITY broadcasting this past weekend & research every single tidbit of intel that passes her way?
We don't need to target our own theres plenty we should be aiming @.

Rant Over

K.W.B Snr

[WhiteFeather]

Maybe we could trash Kerry and also David Wilcock On a whole brand new thread. That would be really entertaining to the forum. Sorta like a double matinee of pure enjoyment and laughs...if you will. Sometimes this place could get a lil judgmental. IMO

OH......And Im being sarcastic about The Bash Kerry And David Thread. BTW!

[Tommy]

Look we should'nt attack Kerry she brings us info she feels is pertinent.
Its easy to forget the excellent info that been brought forward in the past by Projects Camelot & Avalon.
Be honest she is just one lady how can she bring over 3 hours of QUALITY broadcasting this past weekend & research every single tidbit of intel that passes her way?
We don't need to target our own theres plenty we should be aiming @.

Rant Over

K.W.B Snr

Excellent rant if you ask me, and I dare say it is more simply making sense than ranting. Often I see similarities between tabloid discussions in and on many alternative forums , though certainly not as extreme I will admit, most in much stronger ways than Avalon (one of the better for sure). But some time i question peoples inner motivation (not referring to chills in this situation). And yes, though I am surely seen as natural partisan in this situation, I agree.. She produces more than many, and she is certainly not up for serving you the "real" on a platter.. because ONE PERSON CAN NOT POSSIBLY DO THAT! lol.. That simple really. Some will say "she has a responsibility ..." Well, that is true, but don't you? And what is the difference? Not everything can be correct at any time, not everything is easy to check. She is aware of artifacts, but the pics got posted because they came from what appeared to be a credible source. So at the end of the day, she is doing it because most of us aren't doing it, or at the very least enough. My two cents.. Or maybe a quarter ;)

WhiteFeather: I enjoyed your sarcasm :peace:

Edit: Now this was a rant :p

[Vitalux]

Maybe we could trash Kerry and also David Wilcock On a whole brand new thread. That would be really entertaining to the forum. Sorta like a double matinee of pure enjoyment and laughs...if you will. Sometimes this place could get a lil judgmental. IMO

OH......And Im being sarcastic about The Bash Kerry And David Thread. BTW!

Wouldn't it be a wonderful world if nobody ever said anything that anyone else ever found offensive :flypig:

Unfortunately, it would be very difficult to learn much if we were not permitted to ask questions or state our opinions, especially when we encounter those in the media who lie, deceive and falsify information.:bigfish:

Lets face it, even in the bible, one would have to be a bit naive if they accepted that denying Man from the Tree of Knowledge was not going a bit too far :suspicious: ...even if it were GOD himself.


I think free speech is good thing in Avalon as long as it is constructive criticism and based on truth. It is imperative on Avalon, that when posts are created by members, that debate and discussion based on credibility and facts be part of the dialogue. Otherwise, how on earth would we ever filter the feces from the facts.:yes4:

Whitefeather I love and appreciate your word of kindness and wisdom as always :yo:

[Tommy]

Here is the response from the source after asking about the artifact generated by the central mirror:


Tuesday, 25 September 2012 14:56 Written by Kerry Cassidy

I went back to my source on the photos to get a response to the many comments and questions the photos have generated and this is what they said. Keep in mind this is a very deep source and my contact is a go-between:

..."As to the telescope's central mirror artifact, those commenting on this are correct, but what the photos do show is a 'something' that is not part of the mirror/nor the resolution structure of the telescope. It is difficult to see, but is there. It may be more easily seen if you adjust the gain, etc., of the photo. Bear in mind that this is a photo of a screen. NOT a screen shot. That could not (apparently) be taken out of the facility. So there are artifacts from the camera shooting the screen, as well as the telescope central mirror, still, in the photo, you can view a slightly eliptoid body that is larger than the mirror's center."
http://projectcamelotportal.com/kerrys-blog/1315-further-on-deep-space-photos

Maybe or maybe not this is of help for those looking into it, but I guess we will see :)

[RMorgan]

Here is the response from the source after asking about the artifact generated by the central mirror:


Tuesday, 25 September 2012 14:56 Written by Kerry Cassidy

I went back to my source on the photos to get a response to the many comments and questions the photos have generated and this is what they said. Keep in mind this is a very deep source and my contact is a go-between:

..."As to the telescope's central mirror artifact, those commenting on this are correct, but what the photos do show is a 'something' that is not part of the mirror/nor the resolution structure of the telescope. It is difficult to see, but is there. It may be more easily seen if you adjust the gain, etc., of the photo. Bear in mind that this is a photo of a screen. NOT a screen shot. That could not (apparently) be taken out of the facility. So there are artifacts from the camera shooting the screen, as well as the telescope central mirror, still, in the photo, you can view a slightly eliptoid body that is larger than the mirror's center."
http://projectcamelotportal.com/kerrys-blog/1315-further-on-deep-space-photos

Maybe or maybe not this is of help for those looking into it, but I guess we will see :)

Thanks for the update,

So, where´s the picture of this "slightly eliptoid body that is larger than the mirror's center"?

I´d like to see it.

By the way, to what images he´s referring as pictures of a screen?

Those images that Kerry posted before are publicly available, so I guess he´s not referring to them.

Cheers,

Raf.