View Full Version : Revealing Mannerisms and Appearances
christian
29th September 2012, 14:12
When discerning people's words and actions their mannerisms and appearances become increasingly more revealing, I find. I don't know whether this is simply due to the fact that I'm becoming more aware of it of if it's also that people align or don't align with a particular subtle energy that prompts those outer appearances. Maybe it's both.
I observe people who are genuinely committed in the fight for humanity and in the search for truth to be much more energized and stable, even if they are passionate and ruffled at times, they still seem to be animated by a much higher energy than someone who gets angry when being confronted with information that rattles his cage, the comfort zone of his or her restricted world view or even more importantly, information that demands actions to be taken by that person.
3 videos to make my case, in one you can see people wanting government to take care of them. In another you see aware protesters and people from the general public in comparison. In the third you see someone who is 'conciously' part of the system, it's the inglorious "we gotta use covert means against the Iranians" video.
u0K1tLmZRe8
p2_YjU6bnr4
PfoaLbbAix0
If you take it all together, the body language, voice, firmness and cohesiveness, it becomes clear in my opinion, that although information is surely an incredibly important tool, we really are in a battle of frequencies, as it is called, that this saying "change your vibration to change the world" really has a lot to it.
So go on folks, hit em hard with frequencies of cohesive and determined love and freedom and truth and willingness to overcome every challenge. Radiating this consciously really helps so much, I feel. In the depth of their souls people recognize it, when they are confronted with someone who has vigor and the light of liberty and love shining through his or her eyes and their souls, on a deeper level this is what really makes people think, it makes all the difference.
I mean take for example a bewildered and paranoid looking guy telling you some conspiracy theories, lots of true facts but making the impression of being boarderline insane. And then in contrast someone who maybe doesn't even give you that much information, but whose vitality is warming and contagious, which makes you really think about where this person is coming from.
To be quite honest, I was disgusted with all the alien stuff years ago and only because of the physical/energetical appearance of first the George Green interview with Camelot, that has been sent to me by a stranger, and then Bill Ryan's speech at the Zurich conference I looked into the information, back then with the intent to disprove it all. But I made that step, because the people, Bill, Kerry and George, had this particular sincere and decent verve that I found very sympathetic. I actually wanted to help them with analyzing the information and explaining to them and others how they got it all wrong, that the issues and answers lie right here and not with the spacemen, but now I see how it all ties together.
ViralSpiral
29th September 2012, 15:01
Good to see that Patrick Clawson's subtle clip making its rounds.
I agree with what you say. On Wednesday I was having a lunch with a colleague. An astute business woman however, a little asleep, per se. Pleasantries and business completed, she looked me squarely in the eyes and asked: What is REALLY going on?
Ah, the fork in the road. Red pill, blue pill. How far down the *what the bleep do we know* rabbit-hole to go?
I replied that the world is not going to end on 21.12.2012 but that she should wax her surfboard cos its going to get a little rough and since she is becoming aware, not to live in fear but spread love wherever she can.
This quickening will surely make some borderline insane. Lets hope that their turn-around to love and freedom happens, just as fast!
Mike
29th September 2012, 15:04
very cool thread, Christian.
i started a thread many moons ago titled 'are the cabal liars or double-thinkers'? my thinking was, due to the vastness of what most of us feel here is a conspiracy, and the literally hundreds of people that would be required for such a conspiracy to function, that the cabal and it's minions would have to be near picture-perfect actors 24hrs a day, 7 days a week - regular marlon brando's and deniro's. i proposed that even the sharpest of minds would ultimately crumble under that sort of pressure.
or have a i just underestimated them?
i see someone like bill clinton, and he appears to be *very* sincere. perhaps he's just become so comfortable with the lie that it flows naturally; perhaps he now *believes* what he says is true, even while knowing it isn't (double thinking); or perhaps he *is* being truthful most of the time and *we're* all the nutters, having believed in illuminatti and shape-shifting reptiles:) i'm leaning toward the 2nd guess, the double-thinking; the system encourages the success of sociopaths and i don't think it's so coincidental that they've all wound up in washington at this time for this ritualistic pow-wow.
there was a recent thread here on David Icke, which while posturing as an information seeking exercise was most likely a doubt-planting exercise. anyway, maybe i'm very naive, but his mannerisms suggest to me that in no uncertain terms he is telling the truth as he sees it. he is clearly a good man in my eyes. we often talk of discernement here, emphasize it and so on, but with such limited info dancing out there with all the disinfo, it becomes near impossible to draw any reasonable conclusions regarding such esoteric claims as jump rooms, moon bases, etc...often all we have are our witnesses and our ability to translate their mannerisms and appearances.
that's what discernemnt means to me. david icke is a sincere guy, fulford isn't; duncan o'finoan is telling the truth as he sees it 100%, burisch isn't; bill ryan is a reasonable man, steven greer isn't; "Charles" spoke a great deal of truth, leo zagami is a bloody cartoon character...........i could go on and on. body language, mannerisms and appearances do not lie. mouths do, however.
christian
29th September 2012, 16:13
Hard to tell. There are those that say that policy-makers are mind-controlled or hypnotized, that's also what David Icke is saying, isn't it? George Green says many have been replaced by androids, go figure...
m-pzqMUTyfI
n.cangiano
29th September 2012, 16:54
Leo zagami a cartoon character lmao!!!!! Even if everything that came out of his mouth was a lie, watching his camelot interview was worth it for me for laughs. That guy had me cracking up at times. Very entertaining to say the least. Im fairly knew to all this stuff. For the longest time i have always thought that we were not alone, and that something wasnt right either. So now i been watching and ready all this stuff. Trying to take in what i can and as much as i can. Eventually it starts to come down to what is true and what is not. The only way that works for me at this point is a feeling i get. Once i had a spiritually awakening a few years back i realized a feeling within that i never really noticed before or at least as strong as it is now. its almost like a warm vibration feeling, that i feel is my soul acknowleding truth and love that i get from looking within and from others. So basically that has been my approach to how get the answers im looking for. Theres even a few people out there i may not really care for how they deliver there message or conduct themselves and talk to others still give there message their message chance and see how the energy within reacts to whats being presented. I think sticking with that i cant go wrong :)
sigma6
29th September 2012, 19:39
There is plenty to read in faces, mannerisms, choice of words, context, etc. but that is why they train like actors, study, NLP, practice in debates, are treated and handled like actors on stage, learn how to stand, sit, hold a posture, how to move their arms and hands, and they hold their real meetings in private... that is why spontaneous events are so revealing, when someone calls out in the audience, or they are caught off guard with a question, or 'inappropriately' approached or touched, it throws them out of their carefully contrived 'public persona' and sometimes there is something very revealing exposed
one can gather a lot of information from observation over an extended period, absolutely,
many good books written on the subject of facial analysis...
and to me Fulford comes across as the most non-egoistic personality in this whole scheme. Fulford is Fulford, always has been and probably won't change... I love it, wouldn't have him any other way...
gooty64
29th September 2012, 21:12
For consideration, here are 2 short videos.
The first is a video and person I had not seen before today.
YZIHP272wbA
The second is a video that came to mind when I watched the first 2 vids in the OP.
suflkKeMiCg
I am really torn on Alex Jones but, since I saw this crying episode last Dec I find him hard to watch much. Could just be a failed stunt, i don't know.
In the other video of Sonia Barrett, I see her as really genuine and speaking with a connection to higher wisdom. The way she receives her info and intuition sounds very similar to the way David Icke has received his "higher" knowledge.
Selene
29th September 2012, 21:26
One of my favorite techniques for assessing the veracity of a politician, executive or whistleblower is to quite literally “turn off the sound” and just watch the video. Don’t pay any attention to what they’re saying (you can’t hear it anyway…), just watch.
You can learn a great deal about their energy field, their emotional integration, their intelligence, sincerity and even their general capacity for resilience and leadership when you aren’t distracted by analyzing what they’re trying to say.
I’ve found this useful for picking the winner in any political contest. I ask myself: Which candidate has the stronger chi (life force)?
Invariably, that candidate will win the election.
And if you’re in North America, you’ve undoubtedly had the experience surfing around the TV channels and coming across a Televangelist Preacher…. You can always recognize them right away, can’t you? That same “sincere” rictus grin, every time.
Cheers,
Selene
Mike
29th September 2012, 21:30
One of my favorite techniques for assessing the veracity of a politician, executive or whistleblower is to quite literally “turn off the sound” and just watch the video. Don’t pay any attention to what they’re saying (you can’t hear it anyway…), just watch.
You can learn a great deal about their energy field, their emotional integration, their intelligence, sincerity and even their general capacity for resilience and leadership when you aren’t distracted by analyzing what they’re trying to say.
I’ve found this useful to pick the winner in any political contest. I ask myself: Which candidate has the stronger chi (life force)?
Invariably, that candidate will win the election.
And if you’re in North America, you’ve undoubtedly had the experience surfing around the TV channels and coming across a Televangelist Preacher…. You can always recognize them right away, can’t you? That same “sincere” rictus grin, every time.
Cheers,
Selene
so true.
another way of assessing, for me anyway, is humor. if a politician cannot laugh a bit, especially at their own expense, i get suspicious. think Kissinger here;)
Eram
29th September 2012, 21:35
so true.
another way of assessing, for me anyway, is humor. if a politician cannot laugh a bit, especially at their own expense, i get suspicious. think Kissinger here;)
ehh... Kissinger is not an actual politician is he? He just plays in their sandpit
.
I know little about his early years, but has he ever participated in elections? I would be surprised.
just a side note.
nice thread, carry on :)
Earth Angel
30th September 2012, 00:20
hes not actually a person according to some !! just a clone........wouldn't you think he'd have died by now! I can remember that name when I was a little kid and Im in my 50s now
so true.
another way of assessing, for me anyway, is humor. if a politician cannot laugh a bit, especially at their own expense, i get suspicious. think Kissinger here;)
ehh... Kissinger is not an actual politician is he? He just plays in their sandpit
.
I know little about his early years, but has he ever participated in elections? I would be surprised.
just a side note.
nice thread, carry on :)
Mike
30th September 2012, 04:53
so true.
another way of assessing, for me anyway, is humor. if a politician cannot laugh a bit, especially at their own expense, i get suspicious. think Kissinger here;)
ehh... Kissinger is not an actual politician is he? He just plays in their sandpit
.
I know little about his early years, but has he ever participated in elections? I would be surprised.
just a side note.
nice thread, carry on :)
yeah, it's been a while for him - i think he was secretary of state back in 1925 or something like that;) but it might be more accurate to say that politicians are playing in *his* sandpit. that is, if you believe all the rumors.
oh, i lump 'em all together Wakytweaky.;) maybe i shouldn't, but it's sort of a convenient shorthand to just put 'em all under one umbrella.
deridan
30th September 2012, 04:54
no boy Kissinger is a real politician, the ones who get elected are the facade of an incorrect politico-public pullpush&pull
Kissinger is There cause he is a great planner
eventually governments as we know them should dissolve, and just be planning,i.e. these are our objectives, us as we the people, this is what we have this is how we will get out there,
instead of playing with peoples emotions and making a great who-ta-do about nothing, .....wheels spinning in the mud!
(& compared with others in his group, 'even though vil' K is a hero ...let me take a 3rd juncture position to demonstrate for u.... ''may god forgive him, it was as much a product of the times, of incorrect observance, of i.e.broken society')
Energy 2, no Energy 3 first: does it also seem asif idiotFulford is egoless, yes indeed, how is it that multiples can pick that up, yet his always in some forefront seemless
2: the guy in the video that looks like he is a news guy
the problem is that all these variated genres create a big team, a seeming way of doing things, a new morality
and then expect change by this.......the viewed [by thenm] is even more blackened,
{{but then again, u need some of your 5/7dayers beeming moment by mon=ent sihz, just don't take yourself too seriouslyalex ,,, someone like Icke is a heavy weight, does not fight often but when he does expect that his vibrational frequency set blows us away}
Flash
30th September 2012, 05:38
The only one I know who (and I truly personnally know 3 of them) can truly decipher the body language of psychopaths or trained people (psychopaths - lol) have had a good 3 to 5 years training and are working on non verbal language full time since (10-15 years). Below that, psychopaths are extraordinary at hiding everything. You would not even blink at their body language. This is why Clinton is so convincing at times. He temporarily believe himself in his own lies.
I wish I would have pursued these studies. Which I did not, but I know just enough to guess at ordinary liers.
Craig
30th September 2012, 07:01
I liked that show Lie to me, I think that is why they took it off after 3 seasons, most shows I like don't stay around for long but the ones I dislike? Here for ever, big brother et al
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.