View Full Version : David Wilcock: "Will 2012 Be The Year of Freedom?"
Mozart
8th October 2012, 02:29
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1085-2012freedom
An excerpt:
Are we about to see incredible changes for the positive? Will the end of the Mayan Calendar bring triumph rather than disaster? It's time to share the information I've been hearing about major changes we may be about to see. I hope you enjoy it!
Mozart
8th October 2012, 02:45
These negative forces will most definitely be exposed on a mass level. Imminently. Exactly how imminent, I am not certain... but it would definitely appear to be before the end of this year.
No more mainstream media lies. No more mass denial. This is going to be the Big One.
Bold text mine.
Well, I DO hope that he is right about this one!
I, for one, am DAMN TIRED of waiting, waiting and effing waiting for the goddamn Cabal to fall.
David had better be right!
gripreaper
8th October 2012, 02:46
I was quite clearly being asked to abandon everything I was already working on -- which was very complex, including dozens of articles I'd collected on LIBOR, mass shootings, Illuminati and what have you -- and really get centered in nature.
Yup, that rabbit hole is deep, and following Drake into that rabbit hole was a mistake David.
Glad you came to your senses.
ThePythonicCow
8th October 2012, 03:22
it would definitely appear to be
That phrase reads to me like "definitely maybe", expressing with certain conviction an uncertainty.
ThePythonicCow
8th October 2012, 03:29
David says he's traveling in and around Banff National Park in Alberta:
http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Moraine_Lake_17092005.jpg/284px-Moraine_Lake_17092005.jpg
Moraine Lake, and the Valley of the Ten Peaks
Banff National Park
Indeed it is magnificent.
write4change
8th October 2012, 03:41
it would definitely appear to be
That phrase reads to me like "definitely maybe", expressing with certain conviction an uncertainty.
I need that just not on my keyboard. LOL
watchZEITGEISTnow
8th October 2012, 06:53
So the whole "I am Ra" affair?
Sorted?
Caus he kinda lost me big time from that point on...he still has merit?
watchZEITGEISTnow
8th October 2012, 06:56
And while I'm at it - 'The Irish hitman' episode all sorted too?
*WAKE UP PEOPLE*!
watchZEITGEISTnow
8th October 2012, 07:01
Charles, Drake, James, Hoagland, , Greer, Wilcock, Burish, father Christmas, Easter Bunny, Tooth fairy...
(OK I'm being cheeky now) :p
Mad Martian has done a brilliant expose on Hoagland if anyone is interested...
*highly recommend this one..He is excitable, and a little manic - but I believe the Martian's heart to be in the right place...
ysnq9BeZrQ8
wobbegong
8th October 2012, 09:54
So the whole "I am Ra" affair?
Sorted?
Caus he kinda lost me big time from that point on...he still has merit?
LoL Anyone who is still willing to waste time on David's material should listen tho his excellent Ra channeling LoL
It's too funny, he even put the star trek phrase "...to boldly go etc." ...after that show I just couldn't take him seriously any longer.
deridan
9th October 2012, 02:59
changes,....where do they come from...from the 'cosmic(there are various ones including mayan)configurations'
or from ttheORwithin people themselves?
...In ChronosesPropersHand, are many spinning wheels,
so the mayan one comes to an end
my feel on the mayan one is that it must have come from much real-world effort, much research;(even if an alien specie did it, still somebody made mental-correlative effort somewhere)
if you'd want to maximize the potential use of something like the mayan one
you'd have to figure out the new orientations or emanations from the wheel.
they all still there, perhaps just at a different place
Paranormal
9th October 2012, 05:58
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1085-2012freedom
An excerpt:
Are we about to see incredible changes for the positive? Will the end of the Mayan Calendar bring triumph rather than disaster? It's time to share the information I've been hearing about major changes we may be about to see. I hope you enjoy it!
Sorry, I think 21 Dec 2012 is a false date like 01 Jan 2000 - nothing much will happen - but at least the World will be here - so that's something great!
Maunagarjana
9th October 2012, 06:04
LMAO @ the concept of marijuana addiction. Please.
eileenrose
10th October 2012, 05:43
I'm just going to go ahead and say this and let the chips fall where they may (neat saying).
I suppose we've all here read much from David Wilcock. I've read him for several years, met him very briefly etc. So don't know him personally, just publicly.
Anyway, as usual, during my meditative time, I looked back over the day and what I read and yesterday it was David's article saying he didn't want to publish any information that would get him killed, unless I read it wrong (so....totally my interpretation of what he wrote). Everyone here was ....excited, or sounded happy or bemused or whatever....
But when I mediated on what he said, he came across as not his wisdom. So he isn't talking, someone else is through him.
I'd love to delete this. It pains me to post it....as I don't understand (myself).
Is he possessed?
I guess time will tell (hope I am sooo wrong...).
Anyone else get anything intuitively? to perhaps explain this information/message/sending????
enfoldedblue
10th October 2012, 07:30
Hmm there are some interesting parallels between Greg Giles ( the channel who just discovered that he has been seriously manipulated see http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?50407-GFL-channel-Greg-Giles-admits-he-was-scammed ) and David Wilcock. Both, I believe, had histories of drug abuse (drug addicts are apparently frequently used in mind-control projects) prior to becoming big names in the alternative circuit (a push from the PTB can help someone find themselves in the limelight). Both became spokemen for mass arrests (Giles has now admitted in his case this was disinformation). In Greg's case his 'source' claimed they were speaking in his head via radio waves. IF David is similarly a mind control victim then that might explain eileenrose's experience of him.
I am NOT saying this proves anything, but certainly seems worth pointing out.
araucaria
10th October 2012, 08:05
*WAKE UP PEOPLE*!
If you don't mind my saying, this is not "cheeky", it is smug, scornful and simplistic. It is smug: you think you are ahead of the curve. It is scornful: you suggest others who look at this material are asleep. It is most of all simplistic: Disinfo as you know is mostly good info with a twist to it. It might be anything up to 75% good info. Tell a gold miner there is nothing to see: he will shift a tonne of stuff to get a gram of gold, that's one part in a million.
Please stop preaching at us. Watch Zeitgeist now: how are you so sure about that film anyway?
Have a great day :)
The Truth Is In There
10th October 2012, 11:44
2012 will be the year david wilcock loses the last shreds of his credibility. i hope he ascends.
Finefeather
10th October 2012, 12:02
David Wilcock is doing the same as most of these types...making their living out of selling you information which you have no idea about.
One minute you like him, the next minute you hate him...so you never end up with any answers, only curiosity to see what he will come up with next.
There are so many threads on DW already yet we just keep them coming. Proves the yo yo mentality.
He has been doing this since the 2000 doomsday and you still question his authenticity!
David Wilcock is driven by is ego and all his followers feed and sustain him richly.
He has come on earth to learn the folly of spiritual glamour and he is doing a great job of it with all the help he is getting.
Of course that does not make anyone better than anyone else, he is just getting his lesson in public whilst most others get theirs in secret because they might be too embarrassed to let anyone know their weakness.
Love all Beings, do not follow them, you might end up falling over the same cliff they are heading towards.
Love you all
Ray
araucaria
10th October 2012, 12:04
2012 will be the year david wilcock loses the last shreds of his credibility. i hope he ascends.
My point is that the very notion of credibility or lack thereof is totally irrelevant to anyone who accepts responsibility for knowing who they are and where they stand.
David Wilcock could be the best thing since sliced bread or the devil incarnate, or anything in between: that's his choice and it's not for anyone else to say. So quite frankly, my dear, I couldn't give a damn :)
Chester
10th October 2012, 21:59
I was quite clearly being asked to abandon everything I was already working on -- which was very complex, including dozens of articles I'd collected on LIBOR, mass shootings, Illuminati and what have you -- and really get centered in nature.
Yup, that rabbit hole is deep, and following Drake into that rabbit hole was a mistake David.
Glad you came to your senses.
Well Drake made "the top 49 Men of the Year 2012" (he came in at #34)
http://www.askmen.com/specials/top_49_men/
Wilcock didn't even crack the top 100.
Enjoy the Evening (to Westerners) Have an awesome dead of Night (to Easterners) and enjoy everything in between to the rest of us... justone
Chester
10th October 2012, 22:03
So the whole "I am Ra" affair?
Sorted?
Caus he kinda lost me big time from that point on...he still has merit?
Far better to be a Ra child than a Rothschild eh?
Sis Boom Ba, Ra Ra Ra, gggggoooooooooooo Humanity!
Kimberley
10th October 2012, 22:52
I was quite clearly being asked to abandon everything I was already working on -- which was very complex, including dozens of articles I'd collected on LIBOR, mass shootings, Illuminati and what have you -- and really get centered in nature.
Yup, that rabbit hole is deep, and following Drake into that rabbit hole was a mistake David.
Glad you came to your senses.
Well Drake made "the top 49 Men of the Year 2012" (he came in at #34)
http://www.askmen.com/specials/top_49_men/
Wilcock didn't even crack the top 100.
Enjoy the Evening (to Westerners) Have an awesome dead of Night (to Easterners) and enjoy everything in between to the rest of us... justone
Oh come on??? The Drake that made #34 is a musical artist not the other Drake??? And what a bogus list it is about entertainment and political and sports people not about the alternative or spiritual media folks...
Much love!
Chester
10th October 2012, 23:37
I was quite clearly being asked to abandon everything I was already working on -- which was very complex, including dozens of articles I'd collected on LIBOR, mass shootings, Illuminati and what have you -- and really get centered in nature.
Yup, that rabbit hole is deep, and following Drake into that rabbit hole was a mistake David.
Glad you came to your senses.
Well Drake made "the top 49 Men of the Year 2012" (he came in at #34)
http://www.askmen.com/specials/top_49_men/
Wilcock didn't even crack the top 100.
Enjoy the Evening (to Westerners) Have an awesome dead of Night (to Easterners) and enjoy everything in between to the rest of us... justone
Oh come on??? The Drake that made #34 is a musical artist not the other Drake??? And what a bogus list it is about entertainment and political and sports people not about the alternative or spiritual media folks...
Much love!
haha Kimberley... I just couldn't help myself (I knew all along it was a different Drake). But I will say you make my list of Top 49 Women of 2012 in earnest - Perhaps #1 in the Category of Good Vibes. Thanks for being here. Chester
Marin
11th October 2012, 07:18
A few quotes I wanted to highlight:
It clearly showed me there are only two ways you can live your life. There are only two choices you can really make.
One choice is to be forgiving, patient, loving, accepting, kind and nurturing towards other people. In Law of One terms, this is the path of "Love," "service to others," or the "positive polarity."
The other choice is to treat other people as weak, pathetic ....... and utterly unworthy -- to see yourself as clearly and obviously superior, and to have absolutely no care or concern about their feelings -- unless it benefits you. In Law of One terms, this is the path of "Control," "service to self," or the "negative polarity."
Perhaps the most significant Law of One passage is, "In forgiveness lies the stoppage of the wheel of karma."
Forgiving others IS forgiving yourself.
Once you give that magic gift of forgiveness, let go of the need and desire to try to control other people's free will and can see them as beings of infinite worth, you are no longer bound to the "wheel of karma." The "wheel of karma" is what everyone continues to run through until they no longer choose the path of Control -- even slightly.
I've had similar conversations with several people in the last few days discussing these VERY same issues. Clearly, all of us have our own issues to work through. The real question is: HOW are we going to resolve these issues - assuming we have the courage to confront them. As David highlighted earlier, are we going to try and control the patterns that continue to haunt us or are we going to step back and be thoughtful about how we navigate through these changes.
I just "feel" the energies surrounding these issues are extremely intense at the moment and much of what David shares is a sort of reminder. A reminder that you have a choice. A choice regarding HOW you address these issues. Will you move through these changes and your own challenges with the best of intentions and in service of others or will you try and control the people and situations around you.
Much has been said on this forum about what may come to pass in the coming months. More recently, something about "putting your life jackets on." Well, I couldn't agree more. Yes, we need to remember why we came here and yes this is an adventure but perhaps we could take this one step further: HOW are we going to work through these challenges? Maybe, just maybe - these changes are about evaluating what's in your heart and your intentions. Maybe THAT's our mission: Remembering that we need to be "Living in the heart". Perhaps that's the key to putting all of these pieces together.
math330
11th October 2012, 08:46
Far better to be a Ra child than a Rothschild eh?
I read that he was the incarnation of Edgar Cayce as well
The Truth Is In There
11th October 2012, 12:08
2012 will be the year david wilcock loses the last shreds of his credibility. i hope he ascends.
My point is that the very notion of credibility or lack thereof is totally irrelevant to anyone who accepts responsibility for knowing who they are and where they stand.
David Wilcock could be the best thing since sliced bread or the devil incarnate, or anything in between: that's his choice and it's not for anyone else to say. So quite frankly, my dear, I couldn't give a damn :)
wilcock is in the public eye and that means his credibility with people will rise and fall based on his predictions and actions. it's his choice how he acts and what he says but the impression that makes on people is beyond his influence.
it's wonderful that you know who you are and where you stand but that's totally beside the point since we're not discussing you.
you can choose to ignore a discussion about wilcock but then, why post in this thread at all? if you don't give a damn, why comment on the personal opinion of someone else? why do you take part in this discussion at all, my dear?
Lone Bean
11th October 2012, 13:43
Right now I'm about halfway through, "The Source Field Investigations". I don't really know what to make of it.....some things I fully agree on but other stuff just seems too far out there. Michael C. Ruppert swears by David Wilcock and that's about the only reason I'm reading his book. I have a lot of respect for Mr. Ruppert (Move: "Collapse" in 2009). I really want to believe in a new Golden Age and that humanity will suddenly evolve forward, but the skeptic in me keeps telling me it's BS. I guess I'll just have to wait and see.
araucaria
11th October 2012, 13:53
2012 will be the year david wilcock loses the last shreds of his credibility. i hope he ascends.
My point is that the very notion of credibility or lack thereof is totally irrelevant to anyone who accepts responsibility for knowing who they are and where they stand.
David Wilcock could be the best thing since sliced bread or the devil incarnate, or anything in between: that's his choice and it's not for anyone else to say. So quite frankly, my dear, I couldn't give a damn :)
wilcock is in the public eye and that means his credibility with people will rise and fall based on his predictions and actions. it's his choice how he acts and what he says but the impression that makes on people is beyond his influence.
it's wonderful that you know who you are and where you stand but that's totally beside the point since we're not discussing you.
you can choose to ignore a discussion about wilcock but then, why post in this thread at all? if you don't give a damn, why comment on the personal opinion of someone else? why do you take part in this discussion at all, my dear?
You’re right: it’s not about me. And it’s not about Wilcock either. It’s about this notion of credibility, which, when attached to people, is a black or white blanket term about as useful as popularity. It is statements that are credible or not, and that is for each person to decide. To involve the person making the statement amounts to judging one of their statements on the basis of others they have made. If Wilcock says the sun is yellow, that has got to be disinfo coming from him.
That is first degree credibility. We then come to second degree credibility when you start factoring in the credibility rating of the person judging. And so on. The only solution is to weigh up each item of information independently of the source you got it from. Wilcock puts out a lot of good stuff that he is only passing on anyway.
So the purpose of my posting is quite simply to point out that credibility issues are liable to cover up possible sources of useful material, and are therefore themselves a form of disinfo. I don’t want to ignore this, I want to discourage it.
Chester
11th October 2012, 14:15
Will you move through these changes and your own challenges with the best of intentions and in service of others or will you try and control the people and situations around you.
I (likely) will do both. The good news is I have found I do more and more of the former and less and less of the latter. I find life more fulfilling this way. Enjoy the Day and Love to All - justone
Chester
11th October 2012, 14:22
2012 will be the year david wilcock loses the last shreds of his credibility. i hope he ascends.
My point is that the very notion of credibility or lack thereof is totally irrelevant to anyone who accepts responsibility for knowing who they are and where they stand.
David Wilcock could be the best thing since sliced bread or the devil incarnate, or anything in between: that's his choice and it's not for anyone else to say. So quite frankly, my dear, I couldn't give a damn :)
wilcock is in the public eye and that means his credibility with people will rise and fall based on his predictions and actions. it's his choice how he acts and what he says but the impression that makes on people is beyond his influence.
it's wonderful that you know who you are and where you stand but that's totally beside the point since we're not discussing you.
you can choose to ignore a discussion about wilcock but then, why post in this thread at all? if you don't give a damn, why comment on the personal opinion of someone else? why do you take part in this discussion at all, my dear?
OK, I like David Wilcock... but that's just me. I think it would be cool to hang with him and share thoughts. I also think he missed it big time when he explored the various representations of Lucifer as depicted in the art he attributes to the Illuminati... the section where he perceives Jesus as being buried between all artistic representations of Lucifer. Strange to me a guy so sharp can miss the elephant in the living room, but hey, I sometimes do so too.
I am fortunate I do not have to forgive him though (for the transgression I perceived he made) because I don't make the mistake forgiveness requires when it comes to Wilcock or Fulford or Drake or anyone else (even me!) for that matter (and several other internet stars) - and that is I don't judge them in the first place. They are just, like you and me, human beings being. - Chester
Chester
11th October 2012, 14:28
it's his choice how he acts and what he says but the impression that makes on people is beyond his influence.
I am not so sure I can agree with this statement. I believe I have a responsibility related to the impression I make upon others. I believe I can play a conscious role along those lines. Its my belief as well that when a person steps into the limelight, the degree of responsibility in this regard rises. just my opinion. justone(ham).
niki
12th October 2012, 05:33
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Chester
12th October 2012, 13:18
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Is he fake or not? Consider the question carefully. Where is the grey in the possibility set you posed? Where is the wiggle room for a human being?
I don't know David Wilcock personally. Still, from what I have read from him and about him. What I have watched and absorbed in videos where David was either a participant or the subject of the video, what I have experienced through this indirect relationship with David is first and foremost, a human being.
Now, the next thought that pops into my head about David Wilcock is a truly, loving human being.
Then I step back and allow my mind to analyze this creation called David Wilcock, who has become a star (as we define a star to be in the western world at least). Can anyone imagine all the attention a star attracts? Can anyone really know how tricky the realm of limelight can be? How can one be a transparent, genuine, human being when all the eyes upon him want to freeze his image into a defined form such that if the man evolves, changes, makes a mistake, etc. hundreds of thousands of us are ready to point out how -
"look at what happened when he said this other thing would happen"
"look at how he broke down and cried like a poor baby when his life was threatened showing his true lack of courage yet attempting to be an example for us all (or at least a credible messenger of truth)"
"look at all the material in his best selling book... it is just repackaged popular metaphysics with some alternate history and actual (currently bought into) science thrown in"
"look at how he presents himself to be the master dream analyzer and yet when he makes predictions based on his dreams and then those predictions do not come forth in the form he projected, he is always ready to reinterpret what the dream actually meant in relation to what actually happened"
"look at how he goes from here and there all over the world and is the star in his own productions, hob nobbing with the wanna be realized fringe alternative elite (of which i am likely a member by the way but don't have enough money to fully enjoy my mindset)"
yet, what we have is a human... being. I love David Wilcock. I don't like the way he modded Bill Ryan a few months back but I don't like 20 things I did myself just yesterday... I just happened to be under the spotlight of only a few dozen folks.
Anyways - here is the bottom line in everything (from my simplistic point of view. There's the bathtub, the water and the baby. Do your best to avoid throwing out the baby with the (dirty) bathwater when it comes to judging others (if you have to judge in the first place).
If it is discernment you are seeking, again... seek the baby in each and every experience. If you find in another what appears to be mostly (dirty) water, then use your discernment as to how much you invest in what you have exposed yourself to. You may find where once you didn't trust a source at all whatsoever that later you rediscovered material from that same source which suddenly hit you square in the heart as pure and simple truth.
Gotta end with the obvious - Love is the key... love all... be love. Enjoy the rest of the Day justone
modwiz
12th October 2012, 13:37
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Think he is a hologram and has no physical body. How about that?
Tangri
12th October 2012, 13:53
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Think he is a hologram and has no physical body. How about that?
:p you are something modwiz
Earth Angel
12th October 2012, 20:45
I really like the positivity of this last message......call me crazy but (Crazy Butt! :p) I really am hoping he is right and all is going to turn out incredibly FAAAAAAB-UU-LOUS!!!!
gooty64
12th October 2012, 20:56
Earth angel is a Crazy Butt!:boink:
niki
13th October 2012, 01:42
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Think he is a hologram and has no physical body. How about that?
Please do give a serious response, as I'm quite serious when I do ask if David Wilcock is fake, or at the very least still have some 'realness/truth' in him and his channelings/teachings etc?..
thanks.
gripreaper
13th October 2012, 01:59
Anyways - here is the bottom line in everything (from my simplistic point of view. There's the bathtub, the water and the baby. Do your best to avoid throwing out the baby with the (dirty) bathwater when it comes to judging others (if you have to judge in the first place).
So, you comment on the baby and the bath water, but say nothing about the bathtub itself?
I find this rather disturbing, considering that the bathtub is the container from which the entire context for the juxtaposition of the relative basis of the analogy is derived. The water would not even be contained without the bathtub, and therefore, the baby would not have the water in which to be cleansed, which would potentially render the water soiled.
So, I'm not able to grok any conclusions with your analogy, for I do not have a complete context from which to derive an analysis. :p
Chester
13th October 2012, 12:28
so, is he (David) fake or not?
what about all his channelings, prophecies, etc?
I'm confused..
Please explain it briefly. thank you.
Think he is a hologram and has no physical body. How about that?
Please do give a serious response, as I'm quite serious when I do ask if David Wilcock is fake, or at the very least still have some 'realness/truth' in him and his channelings/teachings etc?..
thanks.
Hi niki... was my response (Post #33) a bit too long? - Try this. I take David Wilcock as serious as anyone else. The impression I get is that he is good hearted. Also, he is just like any of us, a human being. Also, he has entered into the limelight - a tricky place indeed. How I get "something" out of David Wilcock is that I do not absorb his messages at the literal level, instead I listen to what he says as metaphor. By doing that I get a great deal out of David Wilcock, except when he misses the boat on the obvious, such as his failure to recognize that the Illuminati perceive Jesus to have been an incarnation of Lucifer. Is this helpful? Love to Ya Chester
Chester
13th October 2012, 12:34
Anyways - here is the bottom line in everything (from my simplistic point of view. There's the bathtub, the water and the baby. Do your best to avoid throwing out the baby with the (dirty) bathwater when it comes to judging others (if you have to judge in the first place).
So, you comment on the baby and the bath water, but say nothing about the bathtub itself?
I find this rather disturbing, considering that the bathtub is the container from which the entire context for the juxtaposition of the relative basis of the analogy is derived. The water would not even be contained without the bathtub, and therefore, the baby would not have the water in which to be cleansed, which would potentially render the water soiled.
So, I'm not able to grok any conclusions with your analogy, for I do not have a complete context from which to derive an analysis. :p
Strange to read this, Grip... the mention of the bathtub suggests I had three components in mind. Sometimes avoiding defining something allows the reader the opportunity to more freely consider what might be the bathtub which was my underlying intention in just mentioning the word.
Perhaps you could suggest what might be the bathtub. I think its a great opportunity here for further exploration.
Love to ya Bro. Chester
jackovesk
14th October 2012, 00:43
David Wilcock's back from the Dead...:faint:
David Wilcock 'Fuked-UP'...:yes4:
Now its 'Adapt or Perish' time...:faint:
David Wilcock - "I know what I'll do..! Just give-em some 'Good-News' for a change and everything will be just dandy..!" :no:
PS - To (ALL) you 'Ascendees Out There', I hope you (ALL) do 'Ascend' so we don't have to put up with anymore of your :bs:
gripreaper
14th October 2012, 00:56
Perhaps you could suggest what might be the bathtub. I think its a great opportunity here for further exploration.
Love to ya Bro. Chester
Just messin with ya bro. Love ya man.
Chester
14th October 2012, 01:03
Perhaps you could suggest what might be the bathtub. I think its a great opportunity here for further exploration.
Love to ya Bro. Chester
Just messin with ya bro. Love ya man.
haha I shoulda known... I sadly still miss the obvious. Thanks anyway though Grip... by the way, you ever have a shot to get down to Costa Rica, I can surely introduce you to some fine 2nd chakra opening wonderments! Take Care, Chester
Wind
14th October 2012, 01:32
David is mostly a messenger to me. A messenger of peace. I'm glad that David has left all that financial stuff behind him. It's not relevant anymore.
Yes, we are going to see massive positive changes, but will there be really hard times before that? I hope not, but no one really seems to know the answer to that question. I'm not worried, but I am excited.
gripreaper
14th October 2012, 01:44
Come on, if you were an ascended master (RA) and an avatar of the highest planetary council, and you were commissioned to step down your ascended status vibration and enter into a third dimensional body, to bring the message of ascension to the masses of earth, who are hopelessly lost in a slave system of control, wandering aimlessly through the widerness of illusions, even after you incarnated as Edgar Cayce and gave them all of the future predictions which they needed, would you not feel somewhat misled by your ascended galactic council who are feeding you information through your dreams, if you vetted the likes of Drake and were very "off" on your guided meditations and dream analysis?
I would take a sabbatical to a high energy dragon point on the earth grid, which is relatively unmolested, like Baniff, and plead with the council to put me back on track for the ascension and come out with a feel good message, redirecting the trajectory of your galactic message towards that which is most palatable for your lost sheep, and come back an announce this major shift.
It's obvious it's working, if you read the comments section at David's blog, which I will paraphrase here: Oh David, we love you so much, thank you for this message, we have waited for two months and you usually do regular updates, and you are needed so much, and we thank you again and again, so we are so glad that you took time to commune with nature because you are so very important and valuable, and you work so hard and tirelessly keeping us abreast of what is going on and how the ascension is doing, we would be totally lost without you, oh dear sweet David!
Comment after comment, the same hero worshiping, while my comments do not make it to posting. My comments are fairly tame and innocuous, but they are not hero worship and pandering.
In other breaking news, Miley Cyrus wore a very revealing bralet on the Jay Leno show last night. Sorry folks, this one comment got away from me a bit. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Hervé
14th October 2012, 02:08
Come on, if you were an ascended master (RA) and an avatar of the highest planetary council, and you were commissioned to step down your ascended status vibration and enter into a third dimensional body...
[...]
Indeed!
Compare a David Wilcock behavior to that gal's son... night and day!
The former, with his history of substance abuse is a prime candidate for the phenomena taken on in the Horus-Ra thread whereas the latter spent many life-times fine tuning how to bootstrap himself out of one's ordinary mess:
BBKn-3zA_T8
[thanks to WhiteFeather for unearthing the video]
watchZEITGEISTnow
20th October 2012, 23:47
Come on, if you were an ascended master (RA) and an avatar of the highest planetary council, and you were commissioned to step down your ascended status vibration and enter into a third dimensional body, to bring the message of ascension to the masses of earth, who are hopelessly lost in a slave system of control, wandering aimlessly through the widerness of illusions, even after you incarnated as Edgar Cayce and gave them all of the future predictions which they needed, would you not feel somewhat misled by your ascended galactic council who are feeding you information through your dreams, if you vetted the likes of Drake and were very "off" on your guided meditations and dream analysis?
I would take a sabbatical to a high energy dragon point on the earth grid, which is relatively unmolested, like Baniff, and plead with the council to put me back on track for the ascension and come out with a feel good message, redirecting the trajectory of your galactic message towards that which is most palatable for your lost sheep, and come back an announce this major shift.
It's obvious it's working, if you read the comments section at David's blog, which I will paraphrase here: Oh David, we love you so much, thank you for this message, we have waited for two months and you usually do regular updates, and you are needed so much, and we thank you again and again, so we are so glad that you took time to commune with nature because you are so very important and valuable, and you work so hard and tirelessly keeping us abreast of what is going on and how the ascension is doing, we would be totally lost without you, oh dear sweet David!
Comment after comment, the same hero worshiping, while my comments do not make it to posting. My comments are fairly tame and innocuous, but they are not hero worship and pandering.
In other breaking news, Miley Cyrus wore a very revealing bralet on the Jay Leno show last night. Sorry folks, this one comment got away from me a bit. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Brilliant!
Those that blindly follow this business man have a low BS detector in my honest belief. Sorry "love and light" crew, this guy is as bent as Greer, Hoagland..
gooty64
21st October 2012, 00:07
Remember earlier this year when David Wilcock and Bill Wood/Brockbrader were gigling on the skype conference with Kerry Cassidy and friends.
And didn't they giggle because they knew something so BIG they couldn't tell us for our own good.
Aww, I am getting a little bit verklempt.:hurt:
deridan
21st October 2012, 13:55
justoneman puts an enlightening light on this,
he is as much a product of this unenlivening time as all.
in 'fake heirachy he must always rise and say something', when his store and what he prepared us for were already complete.
men is still in a fallen state, ...only when there are no hierachies would we all arch through the information milleu, without having to rize up one to speak, and then eat them once there time has passed, ...in our present human culture there is no 'money or recognition' for one who must seep into the background and rejuvenate.
pray for ur time to mature and come, that is the only way u'll play mouth again wilco roger junior
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.