PDA

View Full Version : Anonymous Warning: 5th November 2012



Gemeos
23rd October 2012, 15:41
gteHUvz1_x8

@FawkesSecurity
Dear citizens of the world,
We are anonymous. As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives have effectively been concealed in a government building, situated in the united states of America. on the 5th of November 2012 the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consiquences. We would like to advise that the contraption is built inside a tamper proof apparatus sensitive to physical intrusions or attempted disarmament, thus resulting in the desired effect, if the military grade device is found before the 5th of November. there is no intention, risks or circumstances what so ever to cause harm to innocent people, but we can not, say the same for the people who are the real terrorists, oppressors and war creators.
we are anonymous
we are legion
we do not forget
we do not forgive
on the 5th of November, you will expect us.

RMorgan
23rd October 2012, 16:08
Hey mate,

This is probably another hoax. The real Anonymous group is clearly nonviolent and peaceful; they would never do such thing.

Anyway, if this video wasn´t made by the CIA itself to discredit Anonymous, I´m sure the guy who made it will get himself in real trouble.

Cheers,

Raf.

Wind
23rd October 2012, 16:11
Just look at the dislike bar.

Kristin
23rd October 2012, 16:11
Well I'm glad I'm not a part of that group! If I were to look for a definition of fear porn and propaganda, that would be it. Sad to see violence of that type suggested. I'm more for "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Gandhi

From the Heart,
Kristin

WyoSeeker
23rd October 2012, 16:51
If it happens it's a false flag blamed on Anonymous in order to gain control of the internet.

Just saying....

PurpleLama
23rd October 2012, 17:06
If it happens it's a false flag blamed on Anonymous in order to gain control of the internet.

Just saying....

My thought, as well.

Kristin
23rd October 2012, 17:20
Hey Gemeos,
As you started the thread, what's your take on this?

From the Heart,
Kristin

truth4me
23rd October 2012, 17:20
At this stage of the game I rule nothing out.......

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 17:23
the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol
Transmission control protocol, aka TCP, is the underlying Internet data communication protocol.

Yeah .. like others said above ... someone who doesn't like "our freedoms" on the Internet would stand to gain the most from this.

It seems rather obvious to me that that benefactor would be the bastards in power, not Anonymous.

Kristin
23rd October 2012, 17:26
the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol
Transmission control protocol, aka TCP, the underlying Internet data communication protocol.

Yeah .. like others said above ... someone who doesn't like "our freedoms" on the Internet would stand to gain the most from this.

It seems rather obvious to me that that benefactor would be the bastards in power, not Anonymous.

Agreed Paul, even the "announcement" itself is enough to tighten the control of information on the net... why use bombs when you can create a controlled reality through fear alone?

From the Heart,
Kristin

Snoweagle
23rd October 2012, 17:33
Well I'm glad I'm not a part of that group! If I were to look for a definition of fear porn and propaganda, that would be it. Sad to see violence of that type suggested. I'm more for "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Gandhi

From the Heart,
Kristin

This is NOT Anonymous. This is NOT the intent of Anonymous. Anonymous have never sanctioned ANY threat to life. NO! I AM NOT AFFILIATED with them.

Am so disappointed at your stance of GOADING negative influence here on the Avalon forum against a youthful organisation that has time after time promoted counter corporation corruption. Bringing the actions of corruption into MSM where normally it would be ignored.
Your comment serves to raise the angst and anger of this group, Avalon, against Anonymous BEFORE anything occurs, if at all. This is the same tactic used by government retards and their disinfo agents to INFLUENCE opinion. Serving no more than replacing Al Quaida with a fictitious enemy of Anonymous. Blaming Iran or China would not work so why not pick a group of nerdy hackers, "sounds good, lets do that then".
Furthermore where on earth would these same nerdy hackers obtain these munitions? For goodness sake, its America, the great lock down and it has been placed in a GOVERNMENT building? Are you crazy?
How on earth is ANYBODY going to place munition inside a GOVERNMENT building WITHOUT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES?

Anonymous have been recognised as a pain in the arse to Corporations who abuse their status with respect to humanity. It has coalesced worldwide support for its SOFT approach to the art of rebellion. They have never proposed harm to humanity EVER.

Your comment Kristin implies discrediting Anonymous as a precursor to a hypothetical threat even though WE are expecting another major catastrophe anyway.

Finally, you quote Gandhi "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind", indeed, though you fail to advice the comment was made regarding the Jewish/Anglo/Saxon banking madness that impacting India at that time. Though that same group may indeed have the same influence here as well.

I pray that this is a hoax as I sure many here do also. Look to Government agencies and their corporate allies. Fear porn five star!

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 17:45
There were several tweets to "@FawkesSecurity" (the Anonymous twitter account, apparently) passing the same Youtube link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gteHUvz1_x8) for this warning. The Youtube page links to the original text "By: a guest on Oct 22nd, 2012" at http://pastebin.com/DKvrtiFU

So I gather that someone:

Uploaded the text to pastebin
Uploaded the youtube video to the Youtube account "FawkesS3curity"
Announced it via the "@FawkesSecurity" twitter account.

There are now 31 videos uploaded to that "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account, all but two of which have less than 100 views each. The video Fawkes Security #OperationHSBC (uploaded Oct 18, 2012) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdElGFBfOrQ) now has 3071 views, and this latest video Anonymous Warning: 5th November 2012 (uploaded Oct 22, 2012) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gteHUvz1_x8) now has 301 views.

Here's a screen capture from the "@FawkesSecurity" twitter account, showing the tweets announcing the Youtube video:

http://thepythoniccow.us/anonymous_bomb_threat.png
I suppose that the "15h" on the screen capture means 15 hours ago.

Snoweagle
23rd October 2012, 17:50
Coincidentally, we have another thread posted with regard FBI agents that appeared to want to whistle-blow information to foreign dignitaries as they feared the next false flag was imminent.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?51216-FBI-agent-missing-later-found-dead
http://www.eutimes.net/2012/05/fbi-agent-fleeing-massive-manhunt-warns-theyre-all-insane/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/stephen-ivens-dead-body-o_n_1724936.html

"FBI Agent Fleeing Massive Manhunt Warns “They’re All Insane”
Posted by EU Times on May 16th, 2012
A bizarre Foreign Ministry report circulating in the Kremlin today states that this Friday past (11 May) Russian Envoy Vladimir Vinokurov, the Consulate General of San Francisco, was approached near his hotel room during a visit to Los Angles by an agent of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) identifying himself as Stephen Ivens [photo top right] who warned that he and a former FBI agent named Donald Sachtleben had uncovered evidence of an impending terror attack on US soil stating that those behind the attack were “all insane.”"

Are these two threads linked by circumstance or implication? Do these two innocent posts of "fear porn" set to negatively influence the readers here to condemn an innocent group of hackers
yet the death of one and yet another government FBI whistle-blower imprisoned for child porn thereby keeping secret any future actions by the NWO.

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 17:53
There are now 31 videos uploaded to that "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account, all but two of which have less than 100 views each.
All 31 of the videos on this "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account have been uploaded within the last 5 days. That fact, and the low view count (less than 100) on all but two of the videos tells me this is a recently created account.

The likelihood that this is a "real" Anonymous account is approximately zero, in my view, though I have no conclusive inside information on that.

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 17:56
From this site: http://cyberwarzone.com/anonymous-response-fawkessecurity%E2%80%99s-opv-threats-please-disseminate-it comes this purported response by Anonymous to this bomb thread:




#Anonymous Response to #FawkesSecurity’s #opV threats. Please disseminate it:
CWZ's picture
Submitted by CWZ on Tue, 10/23/2012 - 17:48

Greetings from Anonymous

This message is to the media:

Earlier tonight, the Twitter account @FawkesSecurity posted a link to a pastebin and a YouTube video that stated the following:

“As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives have effectively been concealed in a government building”

Let us be perfectly clear: Anonymous is not a terrorist organization. Anonymous does not use bombs. Anonymous does not condone violence in any way. Anonymous supports justice and universal equal rights. We support peaceful protest.

At this time, we are not sure whether or not @FawkesSecurity is trying to troll, or if he’s trying to discredit the name of Anonymous in the eyes of the world. Maybe @FawkesSecurity’s twitter and YouTube account was hacked. Perhaps this is the FBI’s way of trying to label Anonymous as terrorists so they can begin using the NDAA against us.

Either way, f*ck whoever posted that threat.

We are Anonymous
We are legion
We do not forget
We do not forgive
Expect us

Snoweagle
23rd October 2012, 18:09
On the subject of the TCP protocol which has been around since 1974, it has been largely superseded in many secure environments yet still is prominent over the world wide web.
ANYBODY CAN HACK this protocol. It was the original connection protocol linking two computers.
Check out what wikipedia says:
Vulnerabilities

TCP may be attacked in a variety of ways. The results of a thorough security assessment of TCP, along with possible mitigations for the identified issues, was published in 2009,[21] and is currently being pursued within the IETF.[22]
Denial of service

By using a spoofed IP address and repeatedly sending purposely assembled SYN packets, attackers can cause the server to consume large amounts of resources keeping track of the bogus connections. This is known as a SYN flood attack. Proposed solutions to this problem include SYN cookies and cryptographic puzzles. Sockstress is a similar attack, that might be mitigated with system resource management.[23] An advanced DoS attack involving the exploitation of the TCP Persist Timer was analyzed at Phrack #66.[24]
Connection hijacking
Main article: TCP sequence prediction attack
An attacker who is able to eavesdrop a TCP session and redirect packets can hijack a TCP connection. To do so, the attacker learns the sequence number from the ongoing communication and forges a false segment that looks like the next segment in the stream. Such a simple hijack can result in one packet being erroneously accepted at one end. When the receiving host acknowledges the extra segment to the other side of the connection, synchronization is lost. Hijacking might be combined with ARP or routing attacks that allow taking control of the packet flow, so as to get permanent control of the hijacked TCP connection.[25]

Impersonating a different IP address was not difficult prior to RFC 1948, when the initial sequence number was easily guessable. That allowed an attacker to blindly send a sequence of packets that the receiver would believe to come from a different IP address, without the need to deploy ARP or routing attacks: it is enough to ensure that the legitimate host of the impersonated IP address is down, or bring it to that condition using denial of service attacks. This is why the initial sequence number is now chosen at random.

These are the tools used by Anonymous. They are antiquated but sadly still in use today on the world wide web as they are simple and functional.
Anybody can hack it. It's a mugs game.
Doesn't explain how on earth you link TCP to 200 kilos of munitions INSIDE A GOVERNMENT BUILDING!!!!!

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 18:27
These are the tools used by Anonymous.
TCP is a tool used by all of us :). For example, essentially all communications to web servers, including of course the Avalon forum server, are via TCP.

I'd rather not turn this thread into a tutorial on Internet protocols, but your post strikes me as a mix of selected facts and fear mongering. The essential concept missing in your post is that Internet protocols are several layers deep. Secure and reliable connections are established using higher level protocols, over underlying insecure and unreliable protocols.


Doesn't explain how on earth you link TCP to 200 kilos of munitions INSIDE A GOVERNMENT BUILDING!!!!!
How, or even if, they got the 200 kilos of munitions into a government building isn't clear ... well unless you realize who "they" likely are :).

Getting the TCP link inside is trivial -- wifi is "everywhere" these days. Of course, I see no reason to believe that TCP is actually a critical component in this bomb, if such a bomb exists. What matters to this plot is what the above threat claims, as a potential basis for clamping down on the Internet.

NewFounderHome
23rd October 2012, 18:33
This looks to much like a second group that want's to pass an explosion incident on the back of anonymous and then they will have all the reason's in the world to hunt them down. They will spin it on the main media as internet terrorist, and get the sheep to believe that.

I don't know if you have noticed Romney last night did say then they must look after what is going one on the net. They seem to see the net as a big issue.

KiwiElf
23rd October 2012, 18:38
Regardless of who or how, it would be unwise to ignore it. Fingers crossed it's just a hoax. ;)

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 18:45
Regardless of who or how, it would be unwise to ignore it. Fingers crossed it's just a hoax. ;)

Yup - unwise to ignore it.

The war continues. We continue to watch what the bastards do, pointing out mistakes, while "they" continue to improve their game.

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 19:38
As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives
I don't know what "commercial explosives" they refer to here, but the density of nitroglycerin is 1.6 grams per cubic centimeter.

So working the numbers, 200 kilograms of nitroglycerin could be in the form of a cube 20 inches (50 cm) on a side.

Physically that seems easy enough to hide.

Violet
23rd October 2012, 19:54
Anonymous places bombs now? Not too sure I believe this.

It may very well take place, but probably not by the hand of The Anonymous.

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 19:59
It may very well take place, but probably not by the hand of The Anonymous.
Agreed.

Though I'd wager it's more likely that if the bomb were really going to go off, we'd be hearing about it after the fact.

This story is more likely just the bastards in charge, probing our defenses.

GaelVictor
23rd October 2012, 20:52
Remember, remember the fifth of November
Gunpowder, treason and plot.
I see no reason, why gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot.

Guy Fawkes, guy, t'was his intent
To blow up king and parliament.
Three score barrels were laid below
To prove old England's overthrow.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_Night

spiritguide
23rd October 2012, 22:40
The original post regardless is a terroristic threat, real or not. Those responsible are subject to prosecution with the present laws that exist. The federal conspiricy laws are even tighter, repeating the post can put you into a position of conspiring with a terroristic threat. This should not have been allowed on the forum and if one wanted to inform about the subject they should have just directed those interested to go to the link. IMHO

Are we into high school bomb threats on fridays now?

T Smith
23rd October 2012, 22:58
This reads like a screenplay for a sequel to the series 24.

Kristin
23rd October 2012, 23:00
Well I'm glad I'm not a part of that group! If I were to look for a definition of fear porn and propaganda, that would be it. Sad to see violence of that type suggested. I'm more for "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Gandhi

From the Heart,
Kristin

This is NOT Anonymous. This is NOT the intent of Anonymous. Anonymous have never sanctioned ANY threat to life. NO! I AM NOT AFFILIATED with them.

Am so disappointed at your stance of GOADING negative influence here on the Avalon forum against a youthful organisation that has time after time promoted counter corporation corruption. Bringing the actions of corruption into MSM where normally it would be ignored.
Your comment serves to raise the angst and anger of this group, Avalon, against Anonymous BEFORE anything occurs, if at all. This is the same tactic used by government retards and their disinfo agents to INFLUENCE opinion. Serving no more than replacing Al Quaida with a fictitious enemy of Anonymous. Blaming Iran or China would not work so why not pick a group of nerdy hackers, "sounds good, lets do that then".
Furthermore where on earth would these same nerdy hackers obtain these munitions? For goodness sake, its America, the great lock down and it has been placed in a GOVERNMENT building? Are you crazy?
How on earth is ANYBODY going to place munition inside a GOVERNMENT building WITHOUT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES?

Anonymous have been recognised as a pain in the arse to Corporations who abuse their status with respect to humanity. It has coalesced worldwide support for its SOFT approach to the art of rebellion. They have never proposed harm to humanity EVER.

Your comment Kristin implies discrediting Anonymous as a precursor to a hypothetical threat even though WE are expecting another major catastrophe anyway.

Finally, you quote Gandhi "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind", indeed, though you fail to advice the comment was made regarding the Jewish/Anglo/Saxon banking madness that impacting India at that time. Though that same group may indeed have the same influence here as well.

I pray that this is a hoax as I sure many here do also. Look to Government agencies and their corporate allies. Fear porn five star!

Actually, I do not know who created the video or the group that created it. I stand firm on my thoughts not to join any group that would advocate violence of any kind. I appreciate your passion to defend Anonymous. Please feel free to reread my post at any time, you will see that I did not mention Anonymous personally. I do not know this person however, and do not have an opinion one way or the other as to his/her motives. I not only appreciate Gandhi and his non violent stance to enable change but also hope that others see that the personal choices of one can affect the lives of many, hopefully and always I deem for the better of our future as a whole.

From the Heart,
Kristin

Kiforall
23rd October 2012, 23:15
The mask looks very much like the woman who stand outside the entrance to the Illuminati meeting place where all the politicians etc have the occultist rituals.
Her name is Rose and she carries one.

The voice has been very cleverly chosen to convey wisdom, it's a false flag! me thinks.



A look at the hidden force controlling Hollywood and the Music Industry.
Things are not what they seem...

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, and against spiritual wickedness in heavenly places." - Ephesians 6:12

"Then you will call, and the LORD will answer; you will cry for help, and he will say: 'Here am I'." - Isaiah 58:9


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idAz7mFKPrc

Mandala
23rd October 2012, 23:18
Do people still use nitro? I thought C4 or dirty nukes were the current preferred munitions. They don't spell very well either.
Sorry, I'm being cynical. Bad, bad Mandala.

Lifebringer
23rd October 2012, 23:28
Looks like they are trying to set up Anonymous for a "pearl harbour again."

Ever since they caught that one, and tortured him, Anonymous has been pissed judging by their messages I glimpse every now and then when I feel a curious title, but most of their attacks have not been of the domestic Timothy McVeigh type, and hitting the computer systems for shut down.

This smells like a set up to have them labled as terrorist, and as a warning to Julian Assange with Wiki and others like Rense that tell it like it is and connect the corruption dots.

Kristin
23rd October 2012, 23:34
Posting that video is a perfect way to discredit Anonymous, create the "idea" that the internet has terrorists using it and should be controlled, and create a state of fear in those who watch it. It's really disgusting. There was some money involved... Actor, lighting, nice camera, clean backdrop, etc. Someone has gone through a lot of trouble. I'm glad that the intellect of the alternative community has the ability to see through such obvious deceptions. Video's of this kind stir up emotions and create misunderstandings. They are intended to create emotional rifts between people that would stand rather strongly together.

From the Heart,
Kristin

ThePythonicCow
23rd October 2012, 23:55
The original post regardless is a terroristic threat, real or not. Those responsible are subject to prosecution with the present laws that exist. The federal conspiricy laws are even tighter, repeating the post can put you into a position of conspiring with a terroristic threat. This should not have been allowed on the forum and if one wanted to inform about the subject they should have just directed those interested to go to the link. IMHO
Reporting on, and analyzing, what someone else has done is essentially different than issuing such a threat one's self.

We'd be in sorry shape if discussion of such dangerous nonsense wasn't allowed on forums such as this.

... or look at it this way if you prefer: if posting such as legal dangerous, why does Youtube still have it up? I'm sure their legal team is far better staffed than Project Avalon's legal team.

gripreaper
24th October 2012, 00:14
Do people still use nitro? I thought C4 or dirty nukes were the current preferred munitions. They don't spell very well either.
Sorry, I'm being cynical. Bad, bad Mandala.


on the 5th of November 2012 the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consiquences.

That's because computer nerds don't have spell check in their sophisticated programs.

Or, the spelling could be intentional, to send a secret subliminal coded message out into mind controlled hybrid slave robots, as a trigger word to activate and advance a false flag October surprise subversive terrorist plot, to keep the masses in fear, loathing, powerlessness, lethargy and sleep apnea, while diverting attention from a prescribed colossal event and altering the timeline for the US elections and the outcome of the resultant puppet chosen by the elite puppet-masters, to steer global consciousness towards an agenda of gargantuan alterations in all social and economic sub structures of the intended societies, which has been in place for thousands of years by the nefarious self serving power mongering narcissistic cabalistic elite Archonic reptilian bloodlines.

"Con" means to lead another's consciousness towards a conclusion based on falsehoods and lies, while "si" is a positive variant which when coupled with the negative connotations, implies that confusion is the resultant imperative , and "quences" is a derivative of acquiesce, a solution which gives the outcome to the progenitor and causes the conned to acquiesce to the outcome which was based on falsehoods.

Keep an eye out for this possibility too, ok?

Oh, and I used my spellchecker before I posted, so...

ThePythonicCow
24th October 2012, 00:24
Or, the spelling could be intentional, to ...

Please tell me you ran spell check on all those big words, before posting that :).


Oh, and I used my spellchecker before I posted, so...

Ah - good - you did !

Harley
24th October 2012, 00:53
There are now 31 videos uploaded to that "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account, all but two of which have less than 100 views each.
All 31 of the videos on this "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account have been uploaded within the last 5 days. That fact, and the low view count (less than 100) on all but two of the videos tells me this is a recently created account.

The likelihood that this is a "real" Anonymous account is approximately zero, in my view, though I have no conclusive inside information on that.

Agreed.

It doesn't take much research to debunk this "FawkesS3curity" Youtube account as not being the authentic "Anonymous".

What may be more important though is research to discover who this really is and what's their true motivation for posting it.

Is there some grain of truth here that maybe we should be paying attention to? Who knows. This whole thing could be just another bogus distraction.

But then again, if a bomb as described here did go off, it too could be another form of distraction (ie: A False Flag blamed on Anonymous).

This looks to much like a second group that want's to pass an explosion incident on the back of anonymous and then they will have all the reason's in the world to hunt them down. They will spin it on the main media as internet terrorist, and get the sheep to believe that.

I don't know if you have noticed Romney last night did say then they must look after what is going one on the net. They seem to see the net as a big issue.Good observation.

All I'm saying is Be Aware.

NewFounderHome
24th October 2012, 02:15
Imagine a cabal group or faction that would want to frame Anonymous. That would be a good false flag. A kind of Oklahoma, 9/11.

Now the question is, is there a real boom somewhere or is this a mental fear monger story.

Well this is sad.

Craig
24th October 2012, 03:00
it reeks of a false flag to me, but what scares me is that the majority of the sheeple will believe the lie no matter how much evidence suggests otherwise and what's worse, is that there is the possibility of innocent life being wasted in this action. That worries me, people will suffer and protest and demand action, the wrong action of course.

It's hard to pay attention and yet not become paranoid, I know I am hated it's just the numbers I have wrong!

Dennis Leahy
24th October 2012, 03:44
Well done Paul. Nice deconstruction of this, and I agree with the majority assessment that if something happens, Homeland Security should tell the NSA to tell the CIA to tell the FBI that their joint venture was a failure - because no one fell for it.

Grip, you always crack me up! :~)

Dennis

gooty64
24th October 2012, 11:52
This video reeks of some faction trying to create confusion or stir the pot or dis-credit Anonymous.
I already thought Anonymous was dis-credited so this is just getting bizarre now.
This coming at election time.....doesn't bode well for peace.

gripreaper
24th October 2012, 14:31
This video reeks of some faction trying to create confusion or stir the pot or dis-credit Anonymous.
I already thought Anonymous was dis-credited so this is just getting bizarre now.
This coming at election time.....doesn't bode well for peace.

I think what disturbs me more, is the inordinate number of "Colorado Theatre" type mind controlled massacres and killings, which are meant to vilify the human species and make people believe that there is an uncontrollable hidden nature in all of us that needs to be controlled.

This keeps us suspicious of our neighbors, isolates us, and makes us hesitate to come together as communities for a common goal, while forcing the collective energy towards centralization.

The killing in Sacramento this morning stinks to high heaven.

Gemeos
24th October 2012, 15:40
Hey Gemeos,
As you started the thread, what's your take on this?

From the Heart,
Kristin
Well, whoever they are (or pretend to be), they choose the 5th November, just the day before election day on US, right?!

Someone is trying to induce fear and, maybe, influence voting...
...maybe a False Flag (to induce more fear)...
...maybe just a bad taste joke...

GaelVictor
24th October 2012, 16:05
"And the truth is; there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there..?"

chqi8m4CEEY

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta_(film)

gooty64
24th October 2012, 16:38
Yes this has happened twice in my area in the past 6 weeks-not sure if these two mass murders even made the national headlines.

Minnesota September 2012

2fqtq9g2Yek


Wisconsin October 2012

2d0dETOFE8c
This video reeks of some faction trying to create confusion or stir the pot or dis-credit Anonymous.
I already thought Anonymous was dis-credited so this is just getting bizarre now.
This coming at election time.....doesn't bode well for peace.

I think what disturbs me more, is the inordinate number of "Colorado Theatre" type mind controlled massacres and killings, which are meant to vilify the human species and make people believe that there is an uncontrollable hidden nature in all of us that needs to be controlled.

This keeps us suspicious of our neighbors, isolates us, and makes us hesitate to come together as communities for a common goal, while forcing the collective energy towards centralization.

The killing in Sacramento this morning stinks to high heaven.

ThePythonicCow
24th October 2012, 17:24
Well, whoever they are (or pretend to be), they choose the 5th November, just the day before election day on US, right?!

That day, November 5, was chosen long ago, in the year 1605, by a Mr. Guy Fawkes.


http://brooklynbased.net/wp-content/uploads/art/guy.jpg

Guy Fawkes Day

Remember, remember, the fifth of November

ThePythonicCow
24th October 2012, 18:04
In related news, Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com reports here (http://www.prisonplanet.com/will-anonymous-bomb-threat-throw-election-for-obama.html) that:



... other members of ‘Anonymous’ [plan] to storm the White House and Congress in an attempt to arrest government officials the day before the presidential election

...“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

If you think the Obama administration would never dare stage a crisis for its own political benefit, look no further than the Fast and Furious scandal, a deliberate program to ship guns to Mexican drug lords that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people including a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

Whether this turns out to be the “October surprise” that the likes of ABC News have predicted or not remains to be seen – it’s more likely to end up being a bunch of teenagers stood around in DC doing nothing – but the fact that a group known to be infiltrated by the FBI is openly talking about plans for terrorism and storming the White House the day before the election should be a major concern for everyone.

Mandala
24th October 2012, 18:40
Do people still use nitro? I thought C4 or dirty nukes were the current preferred munitions. They don't spell very well either.
Sorry, I'm being cynical. Bad, bad Mandala.


on the 5th of November 2012 the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consiquences.

That's because computer nerds don't have spell check in their sophisticated programs.

Or, the spelling could be intentional, to send a secret subliminal coded message out into mind controlled hybrid slave robots, as a trigger word to activate and advance a false flag October surprise subversive terrorist plot, to keep the masses in fear, loathing, powerlessness, lethargy and sleep apnea, while diverting attention from a prescribed colossal event and altering the timeline for the US elections and the outcome of the resultant puppet chosen by the elite puppet-masters, to steer global consciousness towards an agenda of gargantuan alterations in all social and economic sub structures of the intended societies, which has been in place for thousands of years by the nefarious self serving power mongering narcissistic cabalistic elite Archonic reptilian bloodlines.

"Con" means to lead another's consciousness towards a conclusion based on falsehoods and lies, while "si" is a positive variant which when coupled with the negative connotations, implies that confusion is the resultant imperative , and "quences" is a derivative of acquiesce, a solution which gives the outcome to the progenitor and causes the conned to acquiesce to the outcome which was based on falsehoods.

Keep an eye out for this possibility too, ok?

Oh, and I used my spellchecker before I posted, so...

Hey, I loved your post. And by the way, you should see how I spell at times!
And, you don't have to be great speller to blow s*&^ up.

But I love your other theory, darn creative and possible.

MorningSong
24th October 2012, 20:05
Interesting... I often read Rumor Mill News and they have had an ad on the righthand side of their page for months now:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/Images/6thofnovember.png

When I click it, it takes me to Amazon to buy the "V" mask....

But what's with the striking out of the number "5th" and putting in the 6th? Election day mascarade party?

Ellisa
25th October 2012, 00:18
The ancient little poem I learned many years ago went:

Please to remember
The fifth of November
Gunpowder, Treason and Plot.
And if we remember
The fifth of November
Will never be forgot.

Two points.
The 5th on November is not just the day before something else.
It looks like the original plot has apparently been forgotten!

The 'mask' by the way, is based on an old image of the man himself--- Guy Fawkes. In some places in the UK he is still burned in effigy, 'a guy' , every Nov 5th.

eni-al
25th October 2012, 01:43
Some man with a mask on camera, flamboyant hand movements, voice synthesizer. All seems very cheesy, and very cringe worthy.

Rocky_Shorz
25th October 2012, 05:31
Quote from Anonymous...


It would be stupid to consider this "threat" by FawkesSecurity to be anything other than a false flag psy-op...


FawkesSecurity is obviously trying to discredit Anonymous. You can take your violent rhetoric & go home.

but they don't like Romney, so a cyber attack on the electronic voting run for America by a Company Romney controls isn't out of the question...

Behind the Veil: Never-Before-Seen Footage of Secret Mormon Temple Rituals...

6udew9axmdM

Rocky_Shorz
25th October 2012, 05:44
look no further than the Fast and Furious scandal, a deliberate program to ship guns to Mexican drug lords that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people including a U.S. Border Patrol agent.


money Laundering for Drug cartels, 8 Billion dollar Ponzi Scheme, and weapons crossing the border...

for who? let me give a hint...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpIyaIHsJbc