View Full Version : English genocide by National Health Service
Snoweagle
27th October 2012, 08:34
Family doctors asked to identify patients likely to die
GPs could then ask patients where they would prefer to die and tell them they can draw up a "living will" to instruct doctors to withdraw life-saving treatment if they become incapacitated in hospital.
The advice giving doctors and health and social workers new guidance on how to select candidates was launched by Liberal Democrat Care Minister Norman Lamb at a conference on end-of-life care.
It states that one in 100 of all doctors' patients are expected to die each year – on average 20 per practice, reports the Daily Mail.
Around 70 per cent to 80 per cent of all deaths are likely to benefit from planned end-of-life care, it states.
But critics say it is a cost saving message and is in danger of creating quotas and a "self-fulfilling prophecy". . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9613997/Family-doctors-asked-to-identify-patients-likely-to-die.html#
Hospitals 'paid millions to put patients on death pathway'
The incentives are paid to hospitals for ensuring that a set percentage of those who die on their wards have been put on the Liverpool Care Pathway, figures disclosed to a newspaper have revealed.
The LCP is intended to ease the last hours of dying patients to save them the suffering caused by invasive treatment but is controversial because critics say it is a way of hastening their deaths.
Figures disclosed to a newspaper shows that in some cases, hospitals have been set targets that between a third and two thirds of all the deaths should be on the pathway.
It was estimated that at least £30 miillion in extra money from taxpayers had been handed to hospitals over the last three years to achieve the goals, according to the Daily Mail.
Professor Patrick Pullicino, a hospital consultant and one of the leading critics of the pathway, told the newspaper: "Given the fact that the diagnosis of impending death is such a subjective one, putting a financial incentive into the mix is really not a good idea and it could sway the decision-making process." . . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9634915/Hospitals-paid-millions-to-put-patients-on-death-pathway.html
How ironic that this scale of institutional abuse in the public domain still fails to wake the sheeple retards up. Perhaps the majority of the population deserve to die anyway? Wrapped in their dismal television lap top fast food obedience existence, lacking foresight or consideration for their own aging families nor themselves.
Now they will be conditioned to sacrifice their own children:
Transfusion of young blood could delay onset of diseases like Alzheimer's
Changes in the composition of our blood as we age may cause the deterioration of memory and other brain functions by damaging connections in the brain.
Filtering younger blood into an older body could combat the problem by rejuvinating old tissue and keeping nerve cells in good working order, according to a new study.
It means people in their 40s or 50s could in future be given blood donated by someone in their early twenties to prevent their brain from deteriorating and stave off diseases like Alzheimer's.
Researchers from Stanford University found that old mice given transfusions of younger blood performed better in a memory task than those left to age naturally.
They also began to re-grow connections in their brains which had previously begun to disappear as part of the aging process and which affect memory. . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9615779/Transfusion-of-young-blood-could-delay-onset-of-diseases-like-Alzheimers.html
Tony
27th October 2012, 08:45
Perhaps vampires know something!
Snoweagle
27th October 2012, 09:42
Perhaps vampires know something!
Well, Alzheimers is a condition where the brain starts to diminish in size and impact the functions of the body/person. Which is NORMAL when you consider the RUBBISH being eaten in the western societies. This is the cause of Alzheimers. After a lifetime of eating OILS, MILK, SUGAR and SALT eventually eradicates the very organ which serves each of us best in maintaining our health. You can throw in all the other chemicals in our foodstuffs and drinks as a bonus to ensure a job well done.
To live a long life you must eat: Fruit, Vegetables, Nuts and Berries.
If you add any other food product to those four then you WILL do yourself harm. I do not give a flying "fig" what ANY expert says contrary to those four, they are lying!
We live in a world of micro-wave smog. This is key to understanding the escalation in many of our afflicted diseases right now. By eating ANY oil based product, deadens the nervous system from performing its duties correctly. The oils are transported around the body and deposited by the blood in our "fattiness" and increases our cholesterol and susceptance to tumours.
By drinking commercial milk you are drinking NON MILK. It lacks the few good stuff that milk was originally known for. Now it is packed full of NON HUMAN hormones, forced into the herds to promote greater yields. Milk dependance is a fallacy, should only be taken occasionally.
The body electric is awesome. Several months ago, I began researching electro-biology, electro-chemistry and electro-nature. There is very little literature governing what is known or practiced across professions. It is key to understanding the chakras, the endocrine system, with the impact on well being and good health.
Yet only today again in the Telegraph I find this:
The electrical storm gathering in biology
When Mary Shelley wrote her gothic masterpiece on the shores of Lake Geneva nearly two centuries ago, she brought Frankenstein’s fictional monster to life using the power of electricity; a form of energy that scientists had recently discovered, which seemed to play a key role in the functioning of the body.
Today, biologists are realising that electricity is even more important than was hitherto thought – so much so that some are talking about a new bioelectrical revolution. It not only governs the contraction of our muscles and carries impulses through our nerves, but also holds the key to a host of illnesses, from the most intense migraines to cystic fibrosis.
Last week, at a lecture in the Royal Institution, London, the Oxford University physiologist Frances Ashcroft explained how this revolution in bioelectricity has happened.
While the electricity we use to power motors, make lights shine and bring our computers to life relies on electrons – the fundamental sub-atomic particles which carry electrical charge – the electricity in our bodies is carried by larger, more complex charged atoms, or ions, which are found in salts such as sodium chloride. While electricity in wires travels at the speed of light, (around 186,000 miles per second), electrical signals are carried around our bodies at a far slower (if still rapid) half a mile per second, or about 1800 mph.
As bioelectricity flashes in and out of our cells, it generates currents of a few picoamperes – about a hundred billionth of the current that makes a light bulb glow. Somehow, the ions carrying these currents have to find a way past the insulating greasy membrane that protects the watery contents of every cell. . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/roger-highfield/9627744/The-electrical-storm-gathering-in-biology.html
This IMO, is fundamental to all health care. The Chinese/Asians have been using this for centuries. Why has this been ignored? How does it correlate with our micro-wave smog existence?
By the way, the Telegraph article in itself, whilst revealing, evades the true emphasis of frequencies which are absolutely necessary to understand the bio electrical/chemical relationship in ALL lifeforms. (the movie Avatar portrayed the correct diagnostic interpretation of this relationship).
araucaria
27th October 2012, 09:52
I hear GPs are going to be vetted every year for suitability in their job. That's going to be a tremendous drain on resources in itself, and if it leads to people being struck off (otherwise why bother?), the surviving GPs are going to be even more submerged in work than before. Crazy
mahalall
27th October 2012, 12:06
"The LCP is intended to ease the last hours of dying patients to save them the suffering caused by invasive treatment but is controversial because critics say it is a way of hastening their deaths" Snoweagle
The introduction of the LCP has helped to standardise the care of the dying. Before it's use a shocking variable of care existed. Unfortunately, in an environment where hospitals in the UK are functioning with bare, minimum resources and often with bed occupancy above 95%. LCP can provide a legally secure method to hasten a timely convenient death. Despite managers potential abuse of the LCP, it has helped improve what was at times a desperately sad situation.
Snoweagle
27th October 2012, 15:21
Definition: care
care [kɛə]
vb
1. (when tr, may take a clause as object) to be troubled or concerned; be affected emotionally he is dying, and she doesn't care
2. (intr; foll by for or about) to have regard, affection, or consideration (for) he cares more for his hobby than his job
3. (intr; foll by for) to have a desire or taste (for) would you care for some tea?
4. (intr; foll by for) to provide physical needs, help, or comfort (for) the nurse cared for her patients
5. (tr) to agree or like (to do something) would you care to sit down, please?
for all I care or I couldn't care less I am completely indifferent
n
1. careful or serious attention under her care the plant flourished he does his work with care
2. protective or supervisory control in the care of a doctor
3. (often plural) trouble; anxiety; worry
4. an object of or cause for concern the baby's illness was her only care
5. caution handle with care
care of at the address of: written on envelopes Usual abbreviation c/o
(Social Welfare)
in (or into) care Social welfare made the legal responsibility of a local authority by order of a court
[Old English cearu (n), cearian (vb), of Germanic origin; compare Old High German chara lament, Latin garrīre to gossip]
@mahalall - your comments italicised - mine roman.
The introduction of the LCP has helped to standardise the care of the dying. By this standardised death. This requires none of the BOLD ITALIC definitions from definition. Institutionalised murder. And you approve?
Before it's use a shocking variable of care existed. No it didn't. There were four hospitals in this ciity when I was a young man, now there is ONE serving a region. That reeks of ECONOMIC genocide.
Unfortunately, in an environment where hospitals in the UK are functioning with bare, minimum resources and often with bed occupancy above 95%. Exactly. Hospital closures over the last twenty years for FALSE accounting justified by the QUACK science of medicine in anticipation for the "baby boomer" generation to age. Premeditated murder.
LCP can provide a legally secure method to hasten a timely convenient death. LAWFUL GENOCIDE or MURDER, take your pick. What on earth is a "timely convenient death"! Especially without CARE!
Despite managers potential abuse of the LCP, it has helped improve what was at times a desperately sad situation. IT IS BEING ABUSED! Furthermore, it does not improve the suffering of those BURDENED by the need of medical advice.
Clearly mahalall, you favour this method of treatment. Maybe you are involved and can probably sleep at night knowing the law protects your vile pathos. No different than concentration camp guards and they swung from lamp-posts by their necks. Must have been a glorious sight to witness.
Personally I find this justification intolerable. I will never accept the Liverpool Care Protocol in any guise.
mahalall
27th October 2012, 16:53
"Clearly mahalall, you favour this method of treatment. Maybe you are involved and can probably sleep at night knowing the law protects your vile pathos. No different than concentration camp guards and they swung from lamp-posts by their necks. Must have been a glorious sight to witness" Snoweagle
Thankyou Snoweagle,
Through shared energy and passion perhaps we could develop an alternative to the LCP.
Snoweagle
27th October 2012, 17:14
"Clearly mahalall, you favour this method of treatment. Maybe you are involved and can probably sleep at night knowing the law protects your vile pathos. No different than concentration camp guards and they swung from lamp-posts by their necks. Must have been a glorious sight to witness" Snoweagle
Thankyou Snoweagle,
Through shared energy and passion perhaps we could develop an alternative to the LCP.
I absolutely agree. I have no idea how to break the deadlock preventing people waking out of the nightmare existence they wrap themselves in. I too was raised as they are, unseeing and believing changes were for the best but now through my own suite of tragedies, am truly awoken and distraught at the magnitude of populace ignorance.
All I can suggest is challenge the beliefs of others ensuring change can occur if people rally together.
mahalall
27th October 2012, 18:07
Taking time to share your thoughts with Professor Steven Wright,
http://nursingstandard.rcnpublishing.co.uk/news-and-opinion/interviews/stephen-wright
contactable at
http://www.sacredspace.org.uk/index.html
a highly receptive person who would welcome your views, with a strong possibility of having them published.
EYES WIDE OPEN
1st November 2012, 15:38
All I can suggest is challenge the beliefs of others ensuring change can occur if people rally together.
Talking of challenging beliefs... I wonder if change can occur in your belief when it is challenged:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?50868-David-Icke-Has-Been-Talking-About-Jimmy-Savile-For-Years&p=577585&viewfull=1#post577585
Flash
1st November 2012, 15:46
most cannot Eyes Wide Open
Arrowwind
1st November 2012, 15:52
And on top of this the movement of State run hospitals to privately owned hospitals in the UK will make things worse. Now all profits in a hospital will go to paying the hedge funds that are backing them up. I assume that before privatization all monies went back into the hospital system. When you have hungry investors at your door much is done to increase profits and decrease the cost and quality of care perhaps pushing medical decisions into directions not previously considered ethical and helpful to the patient.
The Truth Is In There
2nd November 2012, 12:15
Well, Alzheimers is a condition where the brain starts to diminish in size and impact the functions of the body/person. Which is NORMAL when you consider the RUBBISH being eaten in the western societies. This is the cause of Alzheimers. After a lifetime of eating OILS, MILK, SUGAR and SALT eventually eradicates the very organ which serves each of us best in maintaining our health. You can throw in all the other chemicals in our foodstuffs and drinks as a bonus to ensure a job well done.
To live a long life you must eat: Fruit, Vegetables, Nuts and Berries.
If you add any other food product to those four then you WILL do yourself harm. I do not give a flying "fig" what ANY expert says contrary to those four, they are lying!
with these statements you made it clear that you have no clue about proper nutrition.
anyway, back to topic. if people are sick or near death, would like to die but can't kill themselves they should all be given the chance to get help with their suicide. keeping people alive just so they can keep suffering is not only stupid, it's torture. no wonder people reincarnate with a lot of karmic crap attached if they're not even allowed to make a clean cut when life has become a burden.
Anchor
29th November 2012, 03:20
I read this in the UK Daily Mail today - I found it hard reading..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2240075/Now-sick-babies-death-pathway-Doctors-haunting-testimony-reveals-children-end-life-plan.html
--
THEY WISH FOR THEIR BABY TO GO QUICKLY. BUT I KNOW, AS THEY CAN'T, THE UNIQUE HORROR OF WATCHING A CHILD SHRINK AND DIE
--
Here is an abridged version of one doctor's anonymous testimony, published in the BMJ under the heading: 'How it feels to withdraw feeding from newborn babies'.
The voice on the other end of the phone describes a newborn baby and a lengthy list of unexpected congenital anomalies. I have a growing sense of dread as I listen.
The parents want ‘nothing done’ because they feel that these anomalies are not consistent with a basic human experience. I know that once decisions are made, life support will be withdrawn.
Assuming this baby survives, we will be unable to give feed, and the parents will not want us to use artificial means to do so.
Regrettably, my predictions are correct. I realise as I go to meet the parents that this will be the tenth child for whom I have cared after a decision has been made to forgo medically provided feeding.
A doctor has written a testimony published under the heading: 'How it feels to withdraw feeding from newborn babies'
A doctor has written a testimony published under the heading: 'How it feels to withdraw feeding from newborn babies'
The mother fidgets in her chair, unable to make eye contact. She dabs at angry tears, stricken. In a soft voice the father begins to tell me about their life, their other children, and their dashed hopes for this child.
He speculates that the list of proposed surgeries and treatments are unfair and will leave his baby facing a future too full of uncertainty.
Like other parents in this predicament, they are now plagued with a terrible type of wishful thinking that they could never have imagined. They wish for their child to die quickly once the feeding and fluids are stopped.
They wish for pneumonia. They wish for no suffering. They wish for no visible changes to their precious baby.
Their wishes, however, are not consistent with my experience. Survival is often much longer than most physicians think; reflecting on my previous patients, the median time from withdrawal of hydration to death was ten days.
Parents and care teams are unprepared for the sometimes severe changes that they will witness in the child’s physical appearance as severe dehydration ensues.
I try to make these matters clear from the outset so that these parents do not make a decision that they will come to regret. I try to prepare them for the coming collective agony that we will undoubtedly share, regardless of their certainty about their decision.
I know, as they cannot, the unique horror of witnessing a child become smaller and shrunken, as the only route out of a life that has become excruciating to the patient or to the parents who love their baby.
I reflect on how sanitised this experience seems within the literature about making this decision.
As a doctor, I struggle with the emotional burden of accompanying the patient and his or her family through this experience, as much as with the philosophical details of it.
Debate at the front lines of healthcare about the morality of taking this decision has remained heated, regardless of what ethical and legal guidelines have to offer.
The parents come to feel that the disaster of their situation is intolerable; they can no longer bear witness to the slow demise of their child.
This increases the burden on the care-givers, without parents at the bedside to direct their child’s care.
Despite involvement from the clinical ethics and spiritual care services, the vacuum of direction leads to divisions within the care team.
It is draining to be the most responsible physician. Everyone is looking to me to preside over and support this process.
I am honest with the nurse when I say it is getting more and more difficult to make my legs walk me on to this unit as the days elapse, that examining the baby is an indescribable mixture of compassion, revulsion, and pain.
Some say withdrawing medically provided hydration and nutrition is akin to withdrawing any other form of life support. Maybe, but that is not how it feels. The one thing that helps me a little is the realisation that this process is necessarily difficult. It needs to be.
To acknowledge that a child’s prospects are so dire, so limited, that we will not or cannot provide artificial nutrition is self selecting for the rarity of the situations in which parents and care teams would ever consider it.
--
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.