View Full Version : Barack Obama 2012
crested-duck
11th March 2012, 19:05
Identifying our enemy and their strategy 101 --Here's the real dealjGY4vUFgfRk !
Unified Serenity
11th March 2012, 19:17
Pastor Manning shares some information that brings up Bin Laden cover-up and that Breitbart was going to release evidence regarding the false flag bin laden exercise was a hoax (for those of you who have seizures when a pastor goes all preachy, stop listening at 15:30):
N5aD1By3HL0
EnergyGardener
11th March 2012, 19:53
Keep in mind, this might be very real, but not to the core, to expose that the entire garden is contaminated. This could be simply their way of upsetting the apples at the top of the cart, to replace the major players with their appointed / annointed royal? Hilary; Jeb, Newt, or even perhaps, consider RP?
Consider they intend to exact "sweeping" changes of incarceration, World electronic ID and currency, enforcement of new laws and Agenda 21. Consider that neither Obama, or any Republican candidate, will garnish enough support and excitement substantiating that referendum right now...
You might consider this as crazy, but I'd place my bet on Prince William, even Prince Harry (everyone loves a redhead). That's right, the strongest bloodline with looks and more important for the Sheeple, of the beautiful immortalized Mother that everyone loves.
We simply do now know, and unfortunately, are aware enough, that until we realize a complete replacement of the entire body, to the last bone, we realize that we cannot trust any orchestrated action at the top, disguised as legal or otherwise.
We can accept nothing less than a complete overhaul: a new Bottom-Up system with new minimum age officials within our communities that must answer to us; or else they're gone.
In addition, swift justice must be served for the Illuminati crimes at every level, including the real data of missing children, their sacrifice and all those that participated at the top, not to understate removal from our world for those complicit and in partnership within the government, business, entertainment and news media.
I've had enough of this; anybody else?
That's why we're here.
Maia Gabrial
11th March 2012, 21:31
I'm with you, Referee. I'm so sick of their treasonous acts; especially Obama's.
BTW the gallows already exist as in these huge guillotines that the military stashed somewhere. I read that someone who helped transport them snuck into a bathroom on one of their stops and saw them and freaked out. They're probably where the remaining shackle cars are being hidden....or maybe at one or all of the FEMA camps....
Maia Gabrial
11th March 2012, 23:55
You know, the rabbit hole is just too friggin' deep!
Debra
12th March 2012, 02:09
As Michael Moore just said: God, forgive us: U.S.Army Sgt today executed 16 civilians, 9 of them children in Afghanistan. Americans,we fund this´
This is not a pretty story.
I wonder what Obama will say about this one.
America, stand up and change this madness!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/12/world/asia/afghanistan-civilians-killed-american-soldier-held.html?hp
Flash
12th March 2012, 02:38
So sad.
The Canadian army has been there for 5 years, while Americans were in Irak. They had no American support, just Canadians. They did not want to continue the jobs started by American and that is the responsibility of American,- this is why American had to return to Afghanistan - yet, they took their service given to the US seriously and in five years, I never heard of such behavior amongst Canadian soldiers. Same amount of soldiers, same country. They would never have burned the Koran either, because they do have thorough cultural diversity and adaptation training, starting with non verbal cues to cultural ways to be respeced when abroad.(friends of mine are training them in non verbal cues and cultural differences).
What is wrong with Americans? How brainwashed are they? What is going on in that country?
gooty64
12th March 2012, 03:47
As far as I am concerned, if this is true this should be the end of the world.
What is wrong with Americans? How brainwashed are they? What is going on in that country?
Thanks Flash, this isn't about countries.
Flash
12th March 2012, 03:48
As far as I am concerned, if this is true this should be the end of the world.
What is wrong with Americans? How brainwashed are they? What is going on in that country?
Thanks Flash, this isn't about countries.
I agree this is not about countries. However, the biggest one that could wake up and stand up (not its management but its people) is USA and they are not doing it, they are playing world bullies abroad. This is soo sad.
jackovesk
12th March 2012, 04:01
The Australian Media were reporting this story as a 'Rogue' US Soldier who just went mad and shot 16 Children..?
US soldier's murderous rampage 'unforgivable,' says Hamid Karzai
March 12, 2012 11:40AM
Rogue US soldier kills 16 civilians in shooting rampage
Nine children and three women were among the dead
President Hamid Karzai labels killings "unforgivable"
http://www.news.com.au/world/afghan-slaughter-unforgivable-says-hamid-karzai/story-e6frfkyi-1226296969692
gooty64
12th March 2012, 04:03
Flash, America is too programmed and will not wake up without a a MAJOR precipitating event. Most likely dollar collapse....or something worse.
I am in the middle of America and the 90% believe the TV set and MSM.
I have tried to talk to my family and friends but they are stuck in the patriotic America BS paradigm.
the rest of the world has to take the money/dollar away from them.....imho!
Debra
12th March 2012, 05:32
My condolences to those Americans on here. I feel for you, you live this everyday. Caught between a rock and a hard place in your own country.
You are right gooty. The rest of the world needs to stand up too.
And I feel it will happen soon. I am concerned how this will ripple out to create more anger amongst islamic populations in other countries, especially in Europe. It is tinder box already.
Also, I wonder if this event was ´engineered´ Just saying.
ExomatrixTV
12th March 2012, 09:41
BREAKING! - Vice President Joe Biden Forced to Impeach Oathbreaker Obama! After This?
[Mod-edit: The above opening description, and comments below, are misleading. As several have pointed out on this thread, Biden was speaking of Bush in 2007 in the clips shown in the following video. See also my post #33 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?42366-Walter-Jones-would-impeach-Obama-Biden-spoke-of-impeaching-Bush-Confused-video&p=447269&viewfull=1#post447269) below. -Paul.]
MvKfMDzBltY
The first half of this video gives the context of what the major news media has NOT been reporting to you. North Carolina Congressman Walter Jones filed a House Resolution for the initial stages of impeaching President Obama due to the President's dictator-like actions of going to war and invading other countries (supposedly) authorized by the UN world government powers as well as NATO; NOT the Congress as authorized in the constitution.
Vice President Biden has agreed to help impeach the President after explaining that indeed only the U.S. Congress has the power to declare war. Furthermore, he warned that any more undeclared wars such as the current war-mongered Iran fiasco will lead to an undoubtedly supported impeachment of the President.
H.CON.RES.107.IH http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.CON.RES.107
K626
12th March 2012, 09:49
What do you think this is about Exo?
Peace
K
BMJ
12th March 2012, 10:44
Hi K626,
It is straight forward, Obama ordering the US miltary to go to war against a country is illegal, unless he has support from congress. In the case of the Libyan war Obama side stepped congress and order the miltary to attack. For this reason I gather the senator is seeking to impeach Obama. Hope this helps.
Boris
Curt
12th March 2012, 10:48
Devil's advocate here. Doesn't the president have authority under the War Powers Act to wage war for either 60 or 90 days without the consent of Congress?
...And just to be clear, I'm not advocating for war, or for Obama. I just want to make sure we have the facts straight.
From NYT, an explanation of the War Powers Act, revised in 1973....
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/03/29/world/how-war-powers-act-works.html
Curt
12th March 2012, 11:05
The speeches from Joe Biden were in reference to George Bush.
Biden hasn't called for the Impeachment of Obama; though, it would be swell if he did...
Unless you've got news more recent than these clips from 2007, then your thread title is incorrect and misleading.
And again, to be clear....not advocating for war or for Obama. Just want to be sure we avoid hysteria and false hope based on bad information...
But again, if you have newer info, please post to clarify.
:frusty:
Hermite
12th March 2012, 11:12
This resolution was drafted by one man, has no co-sponsors, and is currently being reviewed by a committee.
"This resolution is in the first step in the legislative process. Explanation: Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee.
You can follow it here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc112-107
modwiz
12th March 2012, 11:39
:tape2::bs::censored::noidea::loco:
Curt
12th March 2012, 11:43
Another time-suck, video-dump misdirection away from valid avenues of inquiry.....
Another cut and paste waste of time...
This is a perfect example of why posters should offer a little context--just a few original words to prove they've watched/listened to/read the thing they're plopping onto the forum...
:mad2:
treeman
12th March 2012, 11:57
Words, words, and more WORDS!!!
'Impeachment', please...no one is doing anything,
- Bosnia
- Pakistan
- Iraq
- Afghanistan
- Libya....
....and still no 'Impeachment',
'I'm not worried because the troops are coming home,
sometime, November-ish'...WOW!! the war machine, just
keeps going and going and then some.
jackovesk
12th March 2012, 13:30
What an absolutely 'Load of BS'...
Geezus you made me RATFLMAO Biden...:bs: if the 'Footage' is Legit..???
If the President goes to War with Iran (a Nation of 70 million people) without Constitutional Authority I will 'Impeach' him..!
Then goes on to say...
Obama can only do this if we are Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked..!
Biden is in it up to his ears...
Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked
To me what your hearing here is the (WAR is ON) folks...:yes4:
Make No Mistake about it, they have already made up their minds..!
Quid Pro Quo Biden
1. Attacked = False Flag
2. About to be Attacked = Psyop (Plot) Dodgy/Made up Intel..! Anyone heard the old story, you know the one about WMD's..?
3. Congressional Approval = The Congress is (Bought & Paid For) so they are going to Vote in favor for a War with Iran anyway..!
This is not good news at all, its a 'Setup'...
...and What's even Worse the American Public will Buy It :fish2: (Hook Line & Sinker) yet AGAIN..!
PS - Should have read this Post 1st
The speeches from Joe Biden were in reference to George Bush.
Biden hasn't called for the Impeachment of Obama; though, it would be swell if he did...
Unless you've got news more recent than these clips from 2007, then your thread title is incorrect and misleading.
And again, to be clear....not advocating for war or for Obama. Just want to be sure we avoid hysteria and false hope based on bad information...
But again, if you have newer info, please post to clarify.
:frusty:
PSS - But what I said in my intial post, concerning how they are going to (Hoodwink) the public again, still applies...:yes4:
Curt
12th March 2012, 13:40
What an absolutely 'Load of BS'...
Geezus you made me RATFLMAO Biden...:bs: if the 'Footage' is Legit..???
If the President goes to War with Iran (a Nation of 70 million people) without Constitutional Authority I will 'Impeach' him..!
Then goes on to say...
Obama can only do this if we are Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked..!
Biden is in it up to his ears...
Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked
To me what your hearing here is the (WAR is ON) folks...:yes4:
Make No Mistake about it, they have already made up their minds..!
Quid Pro Quo Biden
1. Attacked = False Flag
2. About to be Attacked = Psyop (Plot) Dodgy/Made up Intel..! Anyone heard the old story, you know the one about WMD's..?
3. Crongressional Approval = The Congress is (Bought & Paid For) so they are going to Vote in favorfor a War with Iran anyway..!
This is not good news at all, its a 'Setup'...
...and What's even Worse the American Public will Buy It :fish2: (Hook Line & Sinker) yet AGAIN..!
Jack,
You know that this is Biden speaking in 2007 about George Bush and not in reference to Obama, right?
jackovesk
12th March 2012, 13:43
What an absolutely 'Load of BS'...
Geezus you made me RATFLMAO Biden...:bs: if the 'Footage' is Legit..???
If the President goes to War with Iran (a Nation of 70 million people) without Constitutional Authority I will 'Impeach' him..!
Then goes on to say...
Obama can only do this if we are Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked..!
Biden is in it up to his ears...
Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked
To me what your hearing here is the (WAR is ON) folks...:yes4:
Make No Mistake about it, they have already made up their minds..!
Quid Pro Quo Biden
1. Attacked = False Flag
2. About to be Attacked = Psyop (Plot) Dodgy/Made up Intel..! Anyone heard the old story, you know the one about WMD's..?
3. Crongressional Approval = The Congress is (Bought & Paid For) so they are going to Vote in favorfor a War with Iran anyway..!
This is not good news at all, its a 'Setup'...
...and What's even Worse the American Public will Buy It :fish2: (Hook Line & Sinker) yet AGAIN..!
Jack,
You know that this is Biden speaking in 2007 about George Bush and not in reference to Obama, right?
Yes I do...:yes4:
As you posted this I was editing mine - See 'Above'...:)
Curt
12th March 2012, 13:46
What an absolutely 'Load of BS'...
Geezus you made me RATFLMAO Biden...:bs: if the 'Footage' is Legit..???
If the President goes to War with Iran (a Nation of 70 million people) without Constitutional Authority I will 'Impeach' him..!
Then goes on to say...
Obama can only do this if we are Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked..!
Biden is in it up to his ears...
Attacked or have (Proof) we are about to be Attacked
To me what your hearing here is the (WAR is ON) folks...:yes4:
Make No Mistake about it, they have already made up their minds..!
Quid Pro Quo Biden
1. Attacked = False Flag
2. About to be Attacked = Psyop (Plot) Dodgy/Made up Intel..! Anyone heard the old story, you know the one about WMD's..?
3. Crongressional Approval = The Congress is (Bought & Paid For) so they are going to Vote in favorfor a War with Iran anyway..!
This is not good news at all, its a 'Setup'...
...and What's even Worse the American Public will Buy It :fish2: (Hook Line & Sinker) yet AGAIN..!
Jack,
You know that this is Biden speaking in 2007 about George Bush and not in reference to Obama, right?
Yes I do...:yes4:
As you posted this I was editing mine - See 'Above'...:)
Okay, cool. :thumb:
jackovesk
12th March 2012, 13:54
Okay, cool. :thumb:
PS - Unfortunately some sloppy work from ExoMatrixTV for posting it without vetting it in the 1st place..! :noidea:
Calz
12th March 2012, 16:43
Murder in Afghanistan, the Coverup Begins (updated)
14520
THE NEW LOOK OF "CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY" TO THE WORLD'S CHILDREN
Sixteen Dead, Nameless “Lone Gunman,” We Have Heard It All Before
by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
The village is Balandi, outside Kandahar in Afghanistan. Thus far the dead are 16, shot in their homes, not just said to be “women and children” but actually infants murdered in their mother’s arms and set afire.
The US claims the perpetrator to be an unnamed “Army Staff Sergeant who has turned himself in.” There are inconsistencies.
The village is outside the gate of an American base. A single soldier without a vehicle would have had to evade security and tunnel under the wire and walls to reach the village or, much more likely, this was more than one man?
This is how CNN has it as for the morning of the 12th. Story embellishment, as you will note involves a “bed count” and a “search patrol.” I believe the next story will include rocket flares and bloodhounds. We will wait for this one. To impart credit to the Army, their belated response is much more creative but as full of holes as a sieve. A minor thing to add here, of course, is that a Staff Sergeant, as the perpetrator or suspect, whichever you choose, “patsy” if you will, is a Staff Sergeant, rank E 6. At 3:AM, those of such rank typically do not “stand watch” on towers or in bunkers.
Then, of course, we will return to the forgotten jerrycan, taken off the nonexistent vehicle to burn the bodies of the dead. I did, however, feel a need to get this response added in so that readers in the Western Hemisphere would be better informed. Another minor error in the report below, noted in our earlier evaluation and reiterated here, above that text, is the nature of the armed response team.
They “came a runnin’” based on someone missing from a bed rather than from gunfire, screams and flaming bodies a short distance away. As is so easily noted, as one begins lying, one lie ties to another, one absurdity to another and, in the end, it is always a “malcontent” and “lone gunman.” By now we would have seen a list of antipsychotic medications but “legal” was already informed by pharmaceutical companies that there is already a rash of murder/suicides for those on medications the military and Departmetn of Veterans Affairs has prescribed for those suffering from combat stress ( or misdiagnosed as suffering from “personality disorders” or “pre-existing trauma”).
In order to leave the many “blameless,” this will have to be a singular occurrance of magical proportions, no pre-indications, no signs of any kind, no diagnosis and medical records entering shredders, being wiped from hard drives, flaming in trash cans as we speak. But for how many, one or four or perhaps more?
CNN:
“We call this an intentional act,” Karzai said. He said the dead included four men, three women and nine children, calling the killings “acts of terror and unforgivable.” Another five people were wounded, he said.
Capt. Justin Brockhoff, an ISAF spokesman, said the wounded Afghans were being treated in ISAF facilities. The allied command did not give its own estimate of casualties.
Brockhoff said officials do not yet have a motive for the shooting, which is under investigation by both NATO and Afghan officials. And Maj. Jason Waggoner, another ISAF spokesman, said the soldier “was acting on his own.”
There were no military operations in the area, either on the ground or in the air, at the time, according to two senior ISAF officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. They said only one soldier, an Army staff sergeant, is believed to have been involved.
A U.S. military official told CNN later Sunday that the suspect is from Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state. The official said the soldier is assigned to a Special Forces unit.
A third ISAF official said Afghan troops spotted the soldier leaving his combat outpost around 3 a.m. Sunday and notified their American counterparts. The U.S. military did an immediate headcount, found the soldier was missing and dispatched a patrol to go look for him, the official said.
The officials said they have no knowledge at this point whether he had any previous medical or mental health issues in his record.
The patrol met him as he returned and took him into custody. He said nothing, and it was unclear whether they knew what had happened, the official said.
“We don’t know what motivated this individual, and we’re not sure where this is going to take us,” Capt. John Kirby, an ISAF spokesman, told CNN. But he said ISAF’s commander, Gen. John Allen, “has made it clear this investigation is going to be thorough. It’s going to be done rapidly, in an expeditious way, and we’re going to hold the perpetrator of these attacks to account.”
Why? Only a vehicle with more than one man, one that could claim it had been tasked with some sort of “rendition” or “search and destroy” mission could have been allowed out by security.
Otherwise, it would have been identified as a criminal operation or, more unlikely, a single individual, driving into what the Army told the Associate Press was “a Taliban infested area” on a private mission of “passion and lust.”
I think that highly unlikely.
Thus, this is what we can safely assume:
More than one American was involved as no single soldier would have been allowed outside the compound, heavily armed with a vehicle.
Gate security received authorization for the “mission” from the watch officer at the “Combat Operations Center” at the base, the 24 hour nerve center than coordinates both offensive and defensive missions for even the smallest commands.
No “reaction force” was sent to investigate though this was right outside the gates. Radio contact would have been attempted, and there would be recorded records of this and all other activities, as required by normal procedures.
How could someone just walk out the gate at night?
Again, we repeat, authorization at the gate, obviously more than one person, a vehicle, radio communications, gunfire overheard, all things that make the story we have received not just unlikely but childish, superficial and an obvious lie to anyone with experience in the military, something 30 million Americans have.
Then, so recent in our minds, is the supposed killing of Osama bin Laden, the contradictory stories, the convenient death of those involved, and, of course, the singular similarity between both operations. Don’t Americans’ throw Muslim dead into the sea?
As this act was so criminal and barbaric in nature, the murder of small children, setting bodies on fire and the reports of multiple soldiers involved, we are beset with questions.
The fire is proof, started with gasoline from a jerrycan. Vehicle means gate which means vehicle which means team which means radios and authorized operation.
It isn’t just that we have so many exhausted soldiers suffering from PTSD in Afghanistan, this isn’t the problem. As in Vietnam, such troops more often turn on their officers and senior NCOs, not local women and children, at least with one exception, My Lai, and that was under direct military command from Captain Ernest Medina.
Who commanded this fiasco?
HOLY WARRIORS OR HELLISH GHOULS?
Next we can ask, what kind of person does this? That I can clearly answer, this is the act of someone with strong religious and political beliefs. Years ago, initially Pentecostal and then broader Dominionist/Dispensationalist theologies under the broader term of “Christian Evangelism” has been behind the atrocities.
Some are tied to doomsday cults, others toward “racial cleansing” and more fall under the influence of politicians.
Those currently are Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum.
Previously, they were the entire Bush administration, which used communist “brainwashing” techniques on troops to encourage them to torture and kill as part of their patriotic and religious duty.
These messages were instilled during training and continually reinforced through televised psyop sessions on the Armed Forces Network and Pentagon Channel.
Such rhetoric has largely disappeared during the Obama administration with the exception of that which is normally part of the daily broadcasts on Fox News with its extremist pundits.
Their message, of the threat of Islam with its high birthrate, stresses extremist methods. Our “churchgoers” and “conservatives” are taught Islam, even small children, are the “enemy of our blood,” as though we all carried a Torah in our pockets.
Much more: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/11/murder-in-afghanistan-the-coverup-begins/
Calz
12th March 2012, 18:11
Several story lines here ...
Yes Biden started this in the cowboy daze ...
and yet ...
He also succumbed to vomit from the mouth into the Obama administration.
Why???
American politicians have long shedded any reason for accountability or responsibility. How else would a psychopath proceed???
Anyway ... nothing will come from the "justice" department unless something so overwhelming came along that actually registered with the 99% (you know ... like what was going to be leaked and caused a young 40ish man to die).
Many sources for this ...
_______________
Biden Demands Impeachment
The President's Own Party Turns Against Him
By John Hayward
3/23/2011
Barack Obama’s presidency has entered a new, and possibly terminal, stage of crisis, as Vice President Joe Biden has called for his impeachment.
“I made it clear to the President,” a furious Biden declared, “that if he takes this nation to war without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him. That is a fact.”
Biden’s comments reflect growing Democrat anger at President Obama’s unilateral military action. In the House, where the impeachment process must begin, Representative Dennis Kucinich has already begun talking about removing Obama from office, which is consistent with his previous stance on President George Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the only Muslim representative in Congress, has said “impeachment should be on the table.”
Much more: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42466
Curt
12th March 2012, 18:44
Several story lines here ...
Yes Biden started this in the cowboy daze ...
and yet ...
He also succumbed to vomit from the mouth into the Obama administration.
Why???
American politicians have long shedded any reason for accountability or responsibility. How else would a psychopath proceed???
Anyway ... nothing will come from the "justice" department unless something so overwhelming came along that actually registered with the 99% (you know ... like what was going to be leaked and caused a young 40ish man to die).
Many sources for this ...
_______________
Biden Demands Impeachment
The President's Own Party Turns Against Him
By John Hayward
3/23/2011
Barack Obama’s presidency has entered a new, and possibly terminal, stage of crisis, as Vice President Joe Biden has called for his impeachment.
“I made it clear to the President,” a furious Biden declared, “that if he takes this nation to war without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him. That is a fact.”
Biden’s comments reflect growing Democrat anger at President Obama’s unilateral military action. In the House, where the impeachment process must begin, Representative Dennis Kucinich has already begun talking about removing Obama from office, which is consistent with his previous stance on President George Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the only Muslim representative in Congress, has said “impeachment should be on the table.”
Much more: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42466
Hi Calz, there is some confusion on this issue.
reading a little further on in the article that you've sited above from humanevents:
"..Gosh, I’m sorry folks, I made a really silly mistake here. I forgot to set the date parameters in my Google search. This is all stuff the Democrats said a few years ago about Bush, not Obama. They were talking about operations in Iraq, and the looming possibility of action against Iran. The only person mentioned above who actually has been treating Obama the same as Bush is Dennis Kucinich. The “recently elected senator” who firmly informed the Boston Globe that unilateral Presidential military action in the absence of an imminent threat is un-Constitutional was Barack Obama himself...."
Biden didn't say it. This is a story about Biden's comments on Bush's regime.
Should Biden be saying it about Obama? Yes. Did he? No.
I just want to make sure we have the facts straight so nobody wastes their time looking into a botched news story based on a misunderstanding of the facts.
Don't mean to keep harping on this, but just want to keep us on track.
:yo:
Calz
12th March 2012, 19:00
Several story lines here ...
Yes Biden started this in the cowboy daze ...
and yet ...
He also succumbed to vomit from the mouth into the Obama administration.
Why???
American politicians have long shedded any reason for accountability or responsibility. How else would a psychopath proceed???
Anyway ... nothing will come from the "justice" department unless something so overwhelming came along that actually registered with the 99% (you know ... like what was going to be leaked and caused a young 40ish man to die).
Many sources for this ...
_______________
Biden Demands Impeachment
The President's Own Party Turns Against Him
By John Hayward
3/23/2011
Barack Obama’s presidency has entered a new, and possibly terminal, stage of crisis, as Vice President Joe Biden has called for his impeachment.
“I made it clear to the President,” a furious Biden declared, “that if he takes this nation to war without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him. That is a fact.”
Biden’s comments reflect growing Democrat anger at President Obama’s unilateral military action. In the House, where the impeachment process must begin, Representative Dennis Kucinich has already begun talking about removing Obama from office, which is consistent with his previous stance on President George Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the only Muslim representative in Congress, has said “impeachment should be on the table.”
Much more: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42466
Hi Calz, there is some confusion on this issue.
reading a little further on in the article that you've sited above from humanevents:
"..Gosh, I’m sorry folks, I made a really silly mistake here. I forgot to set the date parameters in my Google search. This is all stuff the Democrats said a few years ago about Bush, not Obama. They were talking about operations in Iraq, and the looming possibility of action against Iran. The only person mentioned above who actually has been treating Obama the same as Bush is Dennis Kucinich. The “recently elected senator” who firmly informed the Boston Globe that unilateral Presidential military action in the absence of an imminent threat is un-Constitutional was Barack Obama himself...."
Biden didn't say it. This is a story about Biden's comments on Bush's regime.
Should Biden be saying it about Obama? Yes. Did he? No.
I just want to make sure we have the facts straight so nobody wastes their time looking into a botched news story based on a misunderstanding of the facts.
Don't mean to keep harping on this, but just want to keep us on track.
:yo:
You could be quite correctomundo ...
Saw many many 2011 dates on articles but upon looking a bit deeper it appears to be linkage by extension of the remarks against the cowboy admin.
Don't give impeachment memes much credence so didn't pay as close of attention as I should to have posted about it.
___________________
Joe Biden believes President Obama should be impeached over Libyan war
by editor on March 23, 2011
In this interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, Joe Biden clearly states his position that a President should be impeached for launching an attack on a nation that hasn’t attacked the United States.
Of course, the tough-talking Biden was only a Senator when this interview took place and he was speaking of President Bush, but one would hope that his argument remains consistent.
“I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee for 17 years or its ranking member. I teach separation of powers in Constitutional law. This is something I know. So I got together and brought a group of Constitutional scholars together to write a piece that I’m going to deliver to the whole Unites States Senate pointing out the President has no Constitutional authority to take this nation to war against a country of 70 million people unless we’re attacked or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him. The House obviously has to do that, but I would lead an effort to impeach him. The reason for my doing that, and I don’t say it lightly, I don’t say it lightly….”
Perhaps the three words no American wants to hear: President Joe Biden.
Adpa5kYUhCA
http://www.ihatethemedia.com/joe-biden-believes-president-obama-should-be-impeached-over-libyan-war
ExomatrixTV
12th March 2012, 19:19
Sen. Joe Biden on Shalom TV:
yAZmO80dLfE
Joe Biden says I am a zionist:
o0ZIJdN05QE
ExomatrixTV
12th March 2012, 19:30
I was not the original poster & maker of the title ... gave the proper credits in the more info section on youtube. I changed the Title so that guyz like you get some credit having a critical & healthy skeptical mind! No problems with that.
cheers,
John
Curt
12th March 2012, 19:36
Hey Exo,
The story has got it all wrong. The remarks were in reference to Bush, not about Obama. This story is based on faulty reporting. Take a look at the info presented in the thread and see what you think. Maybe change the thread title to something else so folks won't get the wrong idea and think this story is accurate.
Ba-ba-Ra
12th March 2012, 19:38
Hi Calz, there is some confusion on this issue.
reading a little further on in the article that you've sited above from humanevents:
"..Gosh, I’m sorry folks, I made a really silly mistake here. I forgot to set the date parameters in my Google search. This is all stuff the Democrats said a few years ago about Bush, not Obama. They were talking about operations in Iraq, and the looming possibility of action against Iran. The only person mentioned above who actually has been treating Obama the same as Bush is Dennis Kucinich. The “recently elected senator” who firmly informed the Boston Globe that unilateral Presidential military action in the absence of an imminent threat is un-Constitutional was Barack Obama himself...."
Biden didn't say it. This is a story about Biden's comments on Bush's regime.
Should Biden be saying it about Obama? Yes. Did he? No.
I just want to make sure we have the facts straight so nobody wastes their time looking into a botched news story based on a misunderstanding of the facts.
Don't mean to keep harping on this, but just want to keep us on track.
:yo:
Thank you, Thank you CurtisW for all your efforts to keep this thread based on current facts.
ExomatrixTV
12th March 2012, 19:50
~why is that so important for you that for Obama there is no need for accountability and Bush "must" be held accountable! Why 2 different standards?
Is it not that Biden is a hypocrite if he was talking about Bush, meanwhile I also know Biden was referring to ANY future President ... so please do not play the "innocent".
Curt
12th March 2012, 19:56
~why is that so important for you that for Obama there is no need for accountability and Bush "must" be held accountable! Why 2 different standards?
Is it not that Biden is a hypocrite if he was talking about Bush, meanwhile I also know Biden was referring to ANY future President ... so please do not play the "innocent".
Nobody is defending Obama. Of course, he should be held to account. And it goes without saying that he is just as bad as Bush. None of that is at question.
That doesn't mean we can ignore facts, though. The story posted was factually incorrect. Biden isn't backing an impeachment of Obama.
It would be great if he were...but he's not.
We have to pay attention to the stuff that is actually happening and not get sidetracked by junk news that leads us down dead ends...
And yes, Biden is a massive hypocrite...and Obama is a bog-standard, criminal politician...nobody's questioning that or defending these guys
Debra
12th March 2012, 20:09
War related mental health problems amongst soldiers and slow response for help now the focus of blame
Chicago Tribune News, March 12
Afghanistan shootings are latest trouble linked to Lewis-McChord
By Kim Murphy and Christi Parsons
12:34 p.m. CDT, March 12, 2012
Reporting from Seattle and Washington, D.C.—
The staff sergeant who turned himself in after the recent shooting deaths of 16 Afghan civilians was based at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, a sprawling suburban Army facility south of Tacoma, Wash. It's the biggest military base on the West Coast — and one of the most troubled in the Army.
Lewis-McChord, a major staging area for troops going to and from Iraq and Afghanistan, has been plagued over the last two years by a wave of suicides, killings and domestic violence. It was also the scene of the high-profile courts martial of a “kill team” of soldiers on charges of murdering Afghan civilians in Kandahar province for sport.
A U.S. official told the Los Angeles Times that the serviceman now in custody in the latest shootings is a 38-year-old father of two who has spent 11 years in the Army.
He is a veteran of three tours of duty in Iraq and was on his first deployment to Afghanistan, serving as security for special forces in the Kandahar region.
“The individual was augmenting [special operations forces] personnel and his primary responsibility was force protection at the combat outpost," a senior defense official said.
Last month, two investigations were launched at the base’s Madigan Healthcare System after more than 200 soldiers had their diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder set aside following cursory forensic psychiatry reviews — boosting longstanding complaints among soldiers and their families that help for war-related mental health problems has been slow and hard to access.
Madigan’s director, Col. Dallas Homas, has been suspended pending the outcome of the inquiries. The probes follow years of complaints from Lewis-McChord soldiers and their families that soldiers are discouraged by their peers from seeking mental health counseling. Many also say that victims of stress often must endure long waits for an appointment for mental health assistance.
A number of soldiers at Lewis-McChord, like the staff sergeant identified in the Kandahar civilian shootings, have deployed three or more times to Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Times reported in December that Lewis-McChord, a joint Army and Air Force facility with nearly 60,000 military and civilian staff, has seen 62 soldier suicides since 2002, as many as 12 of them last year.
Combat stress and other emotional problems have been a problem throughout the Army, not just at Lewis-McChord. The Army’s public health command reported last week that suicides among soldiers rose 80% between 2004 and 2008, with about a fourth of those linked to combat experience in Iraq.
Communities around Lewis-McChord and other high-deployment bases have also seen troubling rises in crime, domestic violence and other violent crimes, often committed by soldiers with multiple combat deployments.
Earlier this year, a 24-year-old Iraq war veteran shot and killed a park ranger at Mt. Rainier National Park. In December, a Lewis-McChord soldier was charged with premeditated murder in the late-night stabbing of a 19-year-old woman in a Seattle suburb. The wife of a Lewis-McChord sergeant testified earlier this month that her husband doused her legs in lighter fluid and lit her on fire. Other cases have involved a father accused of waterboarding his child, and a soldier who killed his wife and hid her body in the garage.
The highest-profile case so far involved the so-called “kill team” in Kandahar province. Military prosecutors said it went in search of Afghan civilians to kill, setting up “scenarios” that made it look as though the soldiers had been attacked. The group from 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, led by Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs, kept victims' fingers and other gruesome mementos of the killings.
Testimony in the 2010 case played out in a military courtroom for much of last year, with Gibbs ultimately being sentenced in November to life in prison. Three other soldiers were also sentenced to prison.
GI Voice, a local anti-war veterans support group outside Lewis-McChord that has campaigned for better mental health services, on Sunday called for a congressional investigation into the “multiple crises coming from this rogue base.”
“In 10 years of war, JBLM has produced a Kill Team, suicide epidemic, denials of PTSD treatment, denials of human rights in the brig, spousal abuse and a waterboarded daughter, murders of civilians (including a park ranger), increased sex crimes, substance abuse… and much more,” GI Voice’s executive director, Jorge Gonzalez, an Iraq war veteran from Lewis-McChord, said in the statement.
“These abuses are not because of a few bad apples, but because of the base's systematic dehumanization of soldiers and civilians, both in occupied countries and at home.
“It’s surprising, but it’s no longer a shock,” Gonzalez added in an interview. “I just keep expecting, what else is going to happen out of this base?”
The group has scheduled a vigil to memorialize the victims of Sunday’s shooting at 6 p.m. outside one of the base's main gates.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-na-nn-afghanistan-shooting-lewis-mcchord-20120323,0,6884763.story
A STORY BUILDING BACK IN DECEMBER, ALSO SEE: A Base on the Brink, As is the Community´Lewis-McChord's Washington state neighbors are feeling the psychic toll of war (December 26, 2011)
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/26/nation/la-na-military-stress-20111226
ExomatrixTV
12th March 2012, 20:18
WHAT PART OF:
I was not the original poster & maker of the title ... gave the proper credits in the more info section on youtube. I changed the Title so that guyz like you get some credit having a critical & healthy skeptical mind! No problems with that.
cheers,
John
DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? CurtisW ????
Curt
12th March 2012, 20:22
WHAT PART OF:
I was not the original poster & maker of the title ... gave the proper credits in the more info section on youtube. I changed the Title so that guyz like you get some credit having a critical & healthy skeptical mind! No problems with that.
cheers,
John
DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? CurtisW ????
Edited 03/12/12. (I was too quick to be conciliatory in order to get out of a silly conversation. Shouldn't have done that. Lesson learned. In the future will continue to either stand ground, or just exit--no half measures.)
:ranger:
RunningDeer
12th March 2012, 20:47
:chess: What I had posted makes no sense now... Laughing at my self. :wave: :lalala: :pop2:
Lifebringer
12th March 2012, 21:41
As you can see the hate is clear. What has this man done. They won't be satisfied until he's crucified. They just love to hate the blahman.
Even here you get the video scammers trying to mix one statement from 2007, and place it in the 2012 date. Are you a member of Ruperts perversion of truth brigade? I have been watching the comments on here for a long time. Sadly, they never have anything good to say about this President. Just drumming up dehumanization and misinformation to feed the hatemongers. And now the negativity is here.
With all the political slam fest sites, can you answer me, why here? What has my spirituality, got to do with the lies, misinformation and hatred, that is presented everywhere else.
I asked 1st Lady before they moved into the White House, where on this planet, can I go that will not hate me for my color, where for once in my life, i can wake up free of the racism. I don't want it for a couple of months, years, I want to be accepted always, loved always, respected always. My life is ready for some peace. There have been times, when I wanted to quit, attempted to quit, but still I rose. But rose into what? The same hatefilled land of NO acceptance.
I pray that people will understand how important it is for me to purge the pain after 54 years. I think it was time it's said and thought about. A woman without a promised land. They are all in our private parts, does no one care?
percival tyro
12th March 2012, 22:09
Who needs troops when you have neutron bombs.....Bring the troops back later to protect the oil fields.
modwiz
12th March 2012, 22:15
Gordon Duff at VT gives a nice brief summary of it here:http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/12/obama-impreachment-scam-tied-to-nethanyahu-and-neocons/
Obama Impreachment Scam Tied To Nethanyahu and Neocons
WhiteFeather
12th March 2012, 22:22
IMHFO, Joe Biden and The Motley Crue Governments Of The Past And Present, including The Congress and All The Lobbyist Sheisters. Should All Be Fitted With The Silver Bracelets and Tried For War Crimes Immediately. After they are all found guilty, they should be transported Forthwith To A Solar System Far Far Away From Our Galaxy, And Placed On A Planet that can barely sustain any lifeforms. ~SO BE IT~ Nuff Said.
Dennis Leahy
12th March 2012, 23:03
As you can see the hate is clear. What has this man done. They won't be satisfied until he's crucified. They just love to hate the blahman.
Even here you get the video scammers trying to mix one statement from 2007, and place it in the 2012 date. Are you a member of Ruperts perversion of truth brigade? I have been watching the comments on here for a long time. Sadly, they never have anything good to say about this President. Just drumming up dehumanization and misinformation to feed the hatemongers. And now the negativity is here.
With all the political slam fest sites, can you answer me, why here? What has my spirituality, got to do with the lies, misinformation and hatred, that is presented everywhere else.
I asked 1st Lady before they moved into the White House, where on this planet, can I go that will not hate me for my color, where for once in my life, i can wake up free of the racism. I don't want it for a couple of months, years, I want to be accepted always, loved always, respected always. My life is ready for some peace. There have been times, when I wanted to quit, attempted to quit, but still I rose. But rose into what? The same hatefilled land of NO acceptance.
I pray that people will understand how important it is for me to purge the pain after 54 years. I think it was time it's said and thought about. A woman without a promised land. They are all in our private parts, does no one care?
Lifebringer, can you clarify your position, please. It sounds like you're angry at the video maker, for going after Obama.
"What has this man done?" Do you mean Obama? Well, first let's step back a moment and address that Avalon IS an appropriate venue to discuss the tiers of structure of the Global Rulers/Dark Cabal, and anyone that supports them - especially politicians in high office in the land of the Cabal's war machine. If you like, endorse, or admire ANY political figures, you should realize that they are all under scrutiny as minions of the Dark Cabal. I'm actually astounded to meet anyone in 2012 that can ask "what has this man done", if indeed your reference is to Obama. He broke every campaign promise, reversed himself on every issue, in essence giving "W" Bush a third term. You would have had to love "W" to love Barack - although Barak is much more eloquent when he kills, tortures, colludes with bankers and corporations, or removes rights. Well, that's not entirely accurate, because the cool, eloquent Obama has been able to outdo "W" on just about every measure of evil.
This is NOT hate. This is in defense of humanity. One MILLION Iraqi citizens dead, and Obama presided during half of the killings. Obama ORDERED drone attacks in Pakistan literally DAYS after his inauguration. Do you understand what drones are? Drones are unmanned jets with cameras and missiles. Drone "pilots" sit in office cubicles looking at a computer screen. When a "suspect" (that is, someone who is an Arab, maybe someone with brown skin, perhaps wearing the traditional garb of the area) is caught on camera, the "pilot" DECIDES that this is indeed a SUSPECTED MILITANT and fires a missile and blows him and anyone unlucky enough to by standing nearby to pieces. Funerals (http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/obama-terror-drones-cia-tactics-in-pakistan-include-targeting-rescuers-and-funerals/) have been attacked by drones! People trying to rescue the injured after a drone attack are attacked by drones! How sick and insane can they get? The missile may be tipped with depleted uranium - sanctioned by Barack Obama - to guarantee that the hell continues long after the jet flies away.
Let that sink in.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R8xrGzCm9i4/S-4j4PSwhCI/AAAAAAAAALM/NNLwhueLJ4U/s1600/uav4tf3.jpg
Oh, and where did racism enter into this? If you need an African American (actually, I think he prefers to call himself "black") man tell you "what this man has done", articulately, do check out Glen Ford's Black Agenda Report (http://blackagendareport.com/?q=blog/101).
Once you realize that what we are talking about here is a cold-blooded killer, a war criminal, someone that sanctions torture and indefinite detainment, etc., etc., etc. This is not behavior that should be "accepted."
And please don't believe that anyone that goes after Obama is a right-winger, a Republican, or supporter of Rupert Murdoch - I was a Democrat that voted for Obama. But, (like the "newt" scene in The Life Of Brian), I got better. I opened my eyes. Now, I would never ever, ever, ever, support anyone in either of the two war parties: Democorporates or Republicorporates.
At this late stage of the game, I would bet a quart of lanolin that nothing I could say could possibly snap an Obama supporter out of it. The egg either cracks from the inside, or it doesn't crack.
Dennis
gooty64
12th March 2012, 23:19
Dennis, I got suckered by Obama too. I mean how could you not after after 8 years of GW Bush?
Excellent post, thank you.
ThePythonicCow
13th March 2012, 01:11
I changed the Title of this thread to "Walter Jones would impeach Obama; Biden spoke of impeaching Bush; Confused video"
The opening video of this thread (rather deliberately, I presume) created a confusion between:
threats that then Senator Joseph Biden made in 2007 of working to impeach then President George W. Bush, if Bush went to war without Congressional approval, and
the current warnings (see here (http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-Syria-Impeachment-Jones/2012/03/12/id/432245)) by Republican Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina that any unauthorized offensive use of force “constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”
Others have cleared up this confusion, in posts above in this thread - thanks!
The original poster had changed the thread title once, to remove the clear mistake. I just changed it again, to clearly identify the confusion.
modwiz
13th March 2012, 01:56
Dennis, I got suckered by Obama too. I mean how could you not after after 8 years of GW Bush?
Excellent post, thank you.
I voted for him. Besides falling for the sweet song he sang, look what the alternative was. John McCain is a broken and damaged man and the bimbo he had as a running mate qualified anyone who considered her as a true 'junk' DNA.
I can thank Obama for finally getting me out of the neck straining position my head was in. Politics? Never again, until the majority of the current ones are in prison.
Calz
13th March 2012, 02:08
Dennis, I got suckered by Obama too. I mean how could you not after after 8 years of GW Bush?
Excellent post, thank you.
I voted for him. Besides falling for the sweet song he sang, look what the alternative was. John McCain is a broken and damaged man and the bimbo he had as a running mate qualified anyone who considered her as a true 'junk' DNA.
I can thank Obama for finally getting me out of the neck straining position my head was in. Politics? Never again, until the majority of the current ones are in prison.
Now *this* is taking "glass half full" to the limit :laugh:
14529
etm567
13th March 2012, 07:02
Several story lines here ...
Yes Biden started this in the cowboy daze ...
and yet ...
He also succumbed to vomit from the mouth into the Obama administration.
Why???
American politicians have long shedded any reason for accountability or responsibility. How else would a psychopath proceed???
Anyway ... nothing will come from the "justice" department unless something so overwhelming came along that actually registered with the 99% (you know ... like what was going to be leaked and caused a young 40ish man to die).
Many sources for this ...
_______________
Biden Demands Impeachment
The President's Own Party Turns Against Him
By John Hayward
3/23/2011
Barack Obama’s presidency has entered a new, and possibly terminal, stage of crisis, as Vice President Joe Biden has called for his impeachment.
“I made it clear to the President,” a furious Biden declared, “that if he takes this nation to war without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him. That is a fact.”
Biden’s comments reflect growing Democrat anger at President Obama’s unilateral military action. In the House, where the impeachment process must begin, Representative Dennis Kucinich has already begun talking about removing Obama from office, which is consistent with his previous stance on President George Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the only Muslim representative in Congress, has said “impeachment should be on the table.”
Much more: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42466
There is one very telling phrase here:
Biden’s comments reflect growing Democrat anger at President Obama’s unilateral military action.
You can bet your bippy that anyone who refers to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party is ideologically committed to its destruction.
Now, I'm not standing up in support of the Democratic Party today, but no past or present member of that party refers to it that way. It is widely viewed as a deliberate but veiled insult.
crested-duck
13th March 2012, 15:25
Gotta love this guy for calling a spade a spade and telling the truth about this! http://larouchepac.com/node/21985
ThePythonicCow
13th March 2012, 15:30
I was not the original poster & maker of the title
I would encourage all members to take personal responsibility for the truthfulness of the titles and content of their postings, to the reasonable best of their abilities.
If choosing to post something misleading or untrue, use a truthful title and clearly frame the posted material with sufficient context so that the reader is not mislead.
Thanks.
(Just reposting someone else's fabrications is a bit like just following someone else's illegal orders :).)
aranuk
13th March 2012, 16:19
Yes indeed Paul. When I saw the OP video I went through and told my wife about the vice presidents talk about impeaching Obama. I came to computer and realised it was disinfo. I didn't have the nerve to tell my wife I had been mislead again. She has told me many times when she heard me ranting, don't believe everything you see on internet. I hope she doesn't remember this incident. Cos I don't want to look stupid again.
Stan
Dennis Leahy
13th March 2012, 16:34
...You can bet your bippy that anyone who refers to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party is ideologically committed to its destruction.
Now, I'm not standing up in support of the Democratic Party today, but no past or present member of that party refers to it that way. It is widely viewed as a deliberate but veiled insult.
Even though pejoratives like "Dumbocrat", "Democrap", "Rethuglican", and "Resmuglican" are fun insults, they do leave a sense that the other party is better - which of course, is not true. I prefer not to veil the insult, and to use the identical suffix for each franken-word used to describe the two heads of the faux 2-party coin:
Democorporate
and
Republicorporate
In my case, I'm not denigrating those two parties in favor of one of the 3rd parties. I clearly identify ALL political parties as part of the anti-democracy problem. The Financial Elite happen to own the only two parties they need to own right now - the only ones with a snowflake's chance in hell. Political party machinery is a filter mechanism, a way for a group of elites or insiders to pre-select which candidates will be available for the masses to examine. Clearly, we need to get rid of the paradigm that includes political parties. It is good to associate the word "gang" or "syndicate" with the term "political party", as it leaves a much more honest impression.
Dennis
Calz
13th March 2012, 16:44
...You can bet your bippy that anyone who refers to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party is ideologically committed to its destruction.
Now, I'm not standing up in support of the Democratic Party today, but no past or present member of that party refers to it that way. It is widely viewed as a deliberate but veiled insult.
Even though pejoratives like "Dumbocrat", "Democrap", "Rethuglican", and "Resmuglican" are fun insults, they do leave a sense that the other party is better - which of course, is not true. I prefer not to veil the insult, and to use the identical suffix for each franken-word used to describe the two heads of the faux 2-party coin:
Democorporate
and
Republicorporate
In my case, I'm not denigrating those two parties in favor of one of the 3rd parties. I clearly identify ALL political parties as part of the anti-democracy problem. The Financial Elite happen to own the only two parties they need to own right now - the only ones with a snowflake's chance in hell. Political party machinery is a filter mechanism, a way for a group of elites or insiders to pre-select which candidates will be available for the masses to examine. Clearly, we need to get rid of the paradigm that includes political parties. It is good to associate the word "gang" or "syndicate" with the term "political party", as it leaves a much more honest impression.
Dennis
For me at least ... a picture (even photoshopped :laugh: ) tells a thousand words ... :nod:
14552
gripreaper
13th March 2012, 17:25
Even though pejoratives like "Dumbocrat", "Democrap", "Rethuglican", and "Resmuglican" are fun insults, they do leave a sense that the other party is better - which of course, is not true. I prefer not to veil the insult, and to use the identical suffix for each franken-word used to describe the two heads of the faux 2-party coin:
Democorporate
and
Republicorporate
In my case, I'm not denigrating those two parties in favor of one of the 3rd parties. I clearly identify ALL political parties as part of the anti-democracy problem. The Financial Elite happen to own the only two parties they need to own right now - the only ones with a snowflake's chance in hell. Political party machinery is a filter mechanism, a way for a group of elites or insiders to pre-select which candidates will be available for the masses to examine. Clearly, we need to get rid of the paradigm that includes political parties. It is good to associate the word "gang" or "syndicate" with the term "political party", as it leaves a much more honest impression.
Dennis
While we are being bombarded with political theater, and the illusion of choice, let's be clear. ALL potential candidates are vetted and selected by the Council on Foreign relations, and they are all the same, owned by the elite globalists banksters: hook, line and sinker. The idea of choice is an illusion, a distraction, and an outright lie. Republocrats and Democrans, they're all the same.
Those at the top of the power pyramid will do anything to keep the mass of human consciousness off themselves and on issues which don't really mean a hill of beans. Oh, look over here, look over there! The amount of news we are being bombarded with is ten times more than we had 30 years ago, the sound is almost deafening. Most of it means nothing but to create divisiveness, distractions, and mold public opinion.
I hope that mankind is waking up to this fact all around the world, and those in the middle east realize it is not the Americans who are the terrorists, but the global banksters...and we Americans realize it's not the Muslims, but the globalist banksters. It's time to really point the spotlight on who is really messing with planet earth and quit all the political theater and war mongering.
kcbc2010
13th March 2012, 18:54
What is wrong with Americans? How brainwashed are they? What is going on in that country?
The thing is that 9-11 gave the government/authorities an excuse to bully its citizens and they've been doing it for 10 + years now. They have succeeded in getting us to fight and live in fear of each other. Humans aren't meant to live like we are. It's like every time they feel the fear level is leveling off and things get comfortable, they start talking about how the Muslims and the Iranians want to blow up Israel and implement Islamic law in America. Then, the TSA starts making you afraid to travel because they are so concerned about who gets in and they think it's necessary to act like perverts towards the kids/elderly people/women....I'm sure you all remember the "don't touch my junk" guy. And, then we buy into someone saying that he's going to give us "hope and change" while the economy's going south and people are losing their jobs/home/sanity. And this president is just a bully. That's right, I said it. If you don't act or think like Liberals in this country, then you are some freaking lunatic who's out of touch - when the reality is that this guy and the national government are enacting very controversial measures without very much discussion (NDAA) and the Left thinks that everyone will just go along while the Right is MIA. The Right really doesn't have any leadership at the top and they can't understand that people have bought into the rhetoric that they've been spewing for years and years, so they find themselves surprised that regular people are trying to hold them to their words when they are in DC.....not just what they say at election time. , so everyday, normal people are ticked that neither Party are actually looking out for them and their interests. Sure, we yell and scream and call each other Fascists and Socialist, but it's not like anyone listens and tries to actually solve real (not imagined) problems.
And our soldiers, you want to know why they are f*d up? Because recruitment levels aren't the best (gee, what a surprise) these men and women are doing 2-3-4 tours in a war zone and they aren't getting the help that they need to deal with their issues. So, you spend 2-3-4 or more years in a freakin' war zone, that's going to f* you up too -> no wonder people are going "postal" over there.....but I happened to catch in Veterans Today that there's no way that one soldier could just walk off a base like that, but that if you were going to get off base....I don't remember the details of the article, but the main point is that the administration is trying to say that one person when "postal" when it probably was a small unit of men based on what it would take to get off of a highly secured base. So, we have a government that repeatedly lies (anyone remember the guy at the fort in Texas that went postal) and a military that's been acting on a state of war for nearly 11 years. And the rest of us are out here living our lives wondering how these smart people (supposedly) in our leadership class can f* things up so freakin' bad.
But that's what they want. They want us to be angry. They want us to be afraid of our neighbors and play snitch "if you see something out of the ordinary" (gee....wouldn't most law-abiding citizens do that anyways). However, at the same time all of this anger and madness is fuming up around us, we are told "everything's okay. Go on and live your lives, so we have kids that they can't wait to jab when they are barely a day old. Then, the government gets all offended when we demand to actually know what's in our food and water. Then, we start getting ID'd to buy products that we never needed an ID for, but because of some new legislation or regulation we are now asked to show that we aren't criminals and drug dealers (as if a store clerk would be able to tell anyway).
It's the whole "death by a thousand cuts" mentality. It's so obvious to those who see what's going on, but as others have said, there are some that really don't care. They go to work, play sports or video games and that's about it. They complain, but they don't try to change anything because "what's the point" and just accept the brainwashing because it's just easier to go along to get along.
A lot of Americans are wondering what the hell happened to our country. I still have a dream. It's a small dream, but I want to feel the freedom that I felt on 9-10-2001. Too many people are willing to sacrifice their freedom for "faux" security and freebies from the government. And too many in both parties are blinded by their ideologies to see that most Americans aren't extremists in their politics. And there are just thousands of people who are angry, hungry, homeless, broke, fearful and hopeless.
Normally, I'd go back and try to edit/clarify what I wrote, but the fact is that it's just too frustrating/emotional and that's part of the point the more I think about it and that everyone who asks the question is pointing out the same thing. The world is looking at us wondering WTH and, even Americans are wondering WTH. How do you describe millions of people trying to hold it together long enough w/o going postal on their family/friends/neighbors?
You just can't justify any of this s-t, but every day too many people manage to do just that. And people in powerful positions are putting us in positions that we have no control over and won't be able to control if things go south. This is beyond "political" trouble, this is "the world is going to be on fire" trouble and I'm scared to death because they are playing with people's lives.
Cidersomerset
13th March 2012, 20:05
He's right Jaque Cheminade is pointing out what , Jim Marrs and others have been saying for years...
TPTB have turned the US into a corporate fascist state and 9/11 was a updated replay of the
Reigstag fire and the centralising of more powers in Washington is classic authoritarianism
in the name of protecting your lives by taking away gradually more rites and freedoms !!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheminade Draws Parallels Between Obama's Polices and the Start of Nazism
March 12, 2012 • 9:23PM
The remarks made by French Presidential candidate Jacques Cheminade drawing parallels between Barack Obama's policy and the beginnings of Nazism during a radio interview with France Inter on March 9, were quickly quoted by hundreds of media in France, (http://larouchepac.com/node/21936).
To clear up any confusion on the subject, Cheminade released a statement the very same day, to clarify his position. What follows is the English translations from the original French.
"PARIS, March 9, 2012—It is being said everywhere that I compared Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler, during an interview with Pascale Clark this Friday morning on France Inter. I made it clear that I was speaking of the initial period of Nazism in the early 1930s, which was characterized by a series of acts that were unconstitutional and in violation of human rights.
"The principal villainous laws and initiatives of Obama justifying my comparison are the following:
"1. Violation of the constitutional clause according Congress the exclusive authority to declare war, as well as violation of the War Powers Act of 1973.
"2. Violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution establishing that 'no person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' The assassination of citizens by drones and the National Defense Authorization Act attest to this violation.
"3. Obama's health-care reform policy, which denies care to those with chronic illnesses and patients in the terminal phase of illness, is tantamount to the "inadequate provision of surgical and medical services..." which was Count Four of the Nuremberg indictment of major Nazi war criminals, at the time.
"4. Violation of the principle of the separation of powers, in order to impose austerity. The political direction that Obama agreed to on the part of his Wall Street advisors (in particular Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, and Peter Orzag) tramples on defense of the General Welfare and the lives of future generations.
"To say that the current four Republican Presidential candidates would be even worse is true, but it is no excuse. The international financial system is on the verge of exploding, a war is threatening throughout the Persian Gulf, and failures of Barack Obama are leading us to disaster."
music
13th March 2012, 20:32
Also, I wonder if this event was ´engineered´ Just saying.
I do not doubt that it was totally engineered. The Sergeant is a "lone gunman" only in the sense that he is a Lee Harvey Oswald style "patsy".
spiritguide
13th March 2012, 20:33
[/SIZE][/FONT]
Your post is a pretty good outlook on life here on a daily basis. Although I beg to dissagree with your last sentence because they are not playing with our lives, they purposely are doing their best to take it. That is the truth the American people must come to grips with. The native americans stated back when they were relagated to reservations "today us, tomorrow it will be you", need anyone say more. Wake up people this is not a game of monopoly. IMHO
:peace:
Seikou-Kishi
13th March 2012, 21:00
This is awful, really it is. He'll get a slap on the wrist though, just like scum of the Earth Wuterich.
Now Bradley Manning! Now there's a guy who deserves some punishment -_-
Maia Gabrial
14th March 2012, 01:02
'I'm not worried because the troops are coming home,
sometime, November-ish'...WOW!! the war machine, just
keeps going and going and then some.
treeman,
Sure our troops are coming home. Just don't know if this is a good thing since WE may be the next victims, if Obama (and his handlers) had their way....
When I listened to Congressman Jones, I thought FINALLY a politician who's waking up. He didn't back down. I admire that. Panetta and that General (who made my ears hurt with his whistling voice) made themselves pretty clear about what they thought of Congress and the Constitution. There's only one other person I've ever wanted to slap as hard as Panetta, but now he deserves the smack all by himself. When I saw him raise that "loaded hand" gesture at the congressman, I thought he was being aggressive and very disrespectful! Hostility rolled off of him. Cocky sob....! His words convict him...
IMO Obama isn't the only one who should be charged with TREASON.... BTW the NDAA can be used to arrest military leaders, too....
jackovesk
14th March 2012, 02:45
The Intel Hub
March 12, 2012
In response to a poll conducted by World Net Daily, an overwhelming 88% of Americans polled would like to see an Obama Impeachment – 5, 030 total votes as of 03-12-2012 at 9:30 am EST.
The World Net Daily poll was conducted in response to an incredible 6 month investigation of the Long Form Birth Certificate released by the White House.
http://theintelhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Obama-Doorway.png
In addition to the Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC) investigation, even more troubling was the discovery of forged Military Draft Records.
An educational video series of six videos was put together for presentation and is included for your review within this article.
Amazingly, Pravda.Ru, the Russian equivalent of the New York Times, covered this investigation in great detail and points out that the American Corporate Media has Blacked-Out the story.
Could this be considered obstruction of justice, a conspiracy-of-silence or some other kind of criminal act?
Do the American people have an inherent right to be aware of this investigation? Once again, lying by omission is in control – just ignore the story and it will go away.
One has to wonder how long the corporate media can continue to do this and not be completely discredited. It appears they are self-destructing right before our eyes.
The article in Pravda.Ru is an in-depth analysis of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s full news conference video which details a 6-month investigation by the “Cold Case Posse”.
The investigation resulted in many signed affidavits by experts and witnesses, was examined by professions, and is a thorough analysis of the documents.
It appears that Russians and others all over the world are as aware of this situation as the Alternative Media which first presented these anomalies in the Long Form Birth Certificate within days of it being available for download from the Official White House website.
The Russian News agency Pravda [1] posted the story on March 7th which has been totally overlooked by the American Corporate Media. One has to wonder who is in control of our media when a story this significant is exploding internationally, and is nowhere to be found except in Alternative Media.
Looks like the world knows the US Presidency is in serious question – except your average American.
Here is a brief except from the article and the video of the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Investigation Video. There is an additional link to the Poll conducted by World Net Daily in the SOURCES – LINKS section.
“A singularly remarkable event has taken place in the United States of America. This event occurred in Arizona on March 1st and was an earth shattering revelation.
A long awaited press conference was given by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio,[2] a five time elected Sheriff, which should have made national and international headlines. Arpaio’s credentials include serving in the United States Army from 1950 to 1953, service as a federal narcotics agent serving in countries all over the world with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and served as the head of the Arizona DEA. Without doubt, this is a serious Law Enforcement Officer, not one to be taken in by tin-foil-hat wearing loons.
Yet, in the five days since his revelations there has been little in the way of serious reporting on the findings he presented in his presser. With 6 short videos,[3] the Sheriff and his team presented a devastating case, one the tame US press is apparently unable to report.”
Unfortunately, this type of censorship is nothing new. Take for example Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson who spoke about Geoengineering and Death-Dumps [4] and recently passed away from ‘Cancer’.
Did that report ever make any corporate news broadcast?
The Pravda article goes on to state;
“Arpaio asserts that his investigators discovered, during a 6 month long investigation which is ongoing, not only was the “Long Form” likely a digitally created forgery, but the presidents Selective Service Card (Draft Card), allegedly filed in 1980, was also a forgery. These documents are what Barack Hussein Obama relies upon to prove his constitutional eligibility to the office of President of the United States.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yerPzQ4doyU&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yerPzQ4doyU&feature=player_embedded
http://theintelhub.com/2012/03/12/88-of-americans-vote-yes-to-an-obama-impeachment/
humanalien
14th March 2012, 03:29
I'd love to see obama impeached. Then everything that he
signed into law would be cancelled out and they would have
to start all over again. :high5: :bounce:
Phoenix
14th March 2012, 05:48
Who cares what the people think?
grannyfranny100
14th March 2012, 16:21
Thank you. I have already sent this to both of my Senators demanding that Obama be impeached
jackovesk
14th March 2012, 17:14
Mar 12, 2012
Biggest Media Blackout in History
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWL_JHP-Fu0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWL_JHP-Fu0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIFXetW2tfg&annotation_id=annotation_632910&feature=iv&src_vid=cWL_JHP-Fu0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIFXetW2tfg&annotation_id=annotation_632910&feature=iv&src_vid=cWL_JHP-Fu0
http://www.BirtherReport.com
Debra
14th March 2012, 18:07
kcbc2010, my heart is with you, that is a vulnerable post you share. Wow. As someone else on this forum remarked today, again, it is a time when the darkness is being pulled up into the light. And right now, it is happening at a furious pace. However, if I can offer some support here, I would say: TRUST that this is also a time of great letting go, of all the crap and more. And it is happening everywhere. Not just in the US. I myself have to constantly avoid playing too much into the drama in order to not devolve and get caught up in old cycles. It is a habit hard to break, yes, and we have to face it to transform it.
My hope for you is that you hold your centre, move into your soul space and with all your might, keep the love flowing out of you. We need you to do this. There is much pain all around. Your family, your friends and your neighbours all need you to stand with them right now. Especially if they are still rubbing the sleep from their eyes. You are a wayshower, to be sure (another term I noticed used today). The fact that you are on here, tells me something about your commitment to journey into a better world. Have faith in yourself and know in your heart the way to be of great service. I hope this post is finding you stronger today.
Warm wishes,
Zebra
Normally, I'd go back and try to edit/clarify what I wrote, but the fact is that it's just too frustrating/emotional and that's part of the point the more I think about it and that everyone who asks the question is pointing out the same thing. The world is looking at us wondering WTH and, even Americans are wondering WTH. How do you describe millions of people trying to hold it together long enough w/o going postal on their family/friends/neighbors?
You just can't justify any of this s-t, but every day too many people manage to do just that. And people in powerful positions are putting us in positions that we have no control over and won't be able to control if things go south. This is beyond "political" trouble, this is "the world is going to be on fire" trouble and I'm scared to death because they are playing with people's lives. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
modwiz
14th March 2012, 18:58
So sad.
The Canadian army has been there for 5 years, while Americans were in Irak. They had no American support, just Canadians. They did not want to continue the jobs started by American and that is the responsibility of American,- this is why American had to return to Afghanistan - yet, they took their service given to the US seriously and in five years, I never heard of such behavior amongst Canadian soldiers. Same amount of soldiers, same country. They would never have burned the Koran either, because they do have thorough cultural diversity and adaptation training, starting with non verbal cues to cultural ways to be respeced when abroad.(friends of mine are training them in non verbal cues and cultural differences).
What is wrong with Americans? How brainwashed are they? What is going on in that country?
Through our zio-media Americans are taught that Muslims are an evil people bent on killing all non-Muslims. Out soldiers are often exposed and brainwashed by a particularly nihilistic Christian aberration called Dominionists who believe in Armageddon to bring on the Rapture. Therefore, at the most extreme end of our zio-culture we find warriors who believe killing all who worship flase gods must die. Just like in the OT. It is a sad and sickening story and one that lives in the minds of many Americans. Most will draw the line at killing children but their condoning and support of the whole anti-Muslim mindset feeds a monster that is out of their control and acts on its own psychosis.
Words like zio-media and its product zio-culture are not smears at any people but identification of a pernicious and racist ideology that has infected American society by the control of the media by unwitting sympathizers and outright supporters.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
The Australian Media were reporting this story as a 'Rogue' US Soldier who just went mad and shot 16 Children..?
US soldier's murderous rampage 'unforgivable,' says Hamid Karzai
March 12, 2012 11:40AM
Rogue US soldier kills 16 civilians in shooting rampage
Nine children and three women were among the dead
President Hamid Karzai labels killings "unforgivable"
http://www.news.com.au/world/afghan-slaughter-unforgivable-says-hamid-karzai/story-e6frfkyi-1226296969692
Karzai is an American stooge suppository. His words are for domestic consumption.
Cidersomerset
14th March 2012, 19:37
I just caught the start of Cannel 4 news UK 7pm, one of the better mainstream outlets in the UK
and watched the hype over Camerons 'Special Relationship' with Obama !!
http://www.channel4.com/media/images/Channel4/c4-news/2012/March/14/14_cameron_g_w_A2.jpg
Cameron and Obama announce Afghanistan pullout plans
14 March 2012 Channel 4 News
David Cameron and Barack Obama have declared their determination to "complete the mission" in Afghanistan and described British-American relations as stronger than ever.
=============================================================
sm8IXXUMiUc
Barack Obama and David Cameron were made for each other
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100143957/barack-obama-and-david-cameron-were-made-for-each-other/
Of course they are they are both puppets of the Zionist NWO....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2114886/Our-closest-friend-deepest-ally-Obama-Cameron-display-friendship-White-House-lawn.html?ITO=1490
mwa_qyR1nVw
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2012/03/register-cameron-obama-game
This is all part of the fascist propaganda, Goebbels would be proud of.....
They have nothing personnally in common apart from their masters agenda !!
this is all 'crass politicing'...Getting the press and gaeneral public ready
for the next joint manouvre whether in Syria, Iran ,Africa !!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no problems of having very close relations with our 'family' in America
and together we are a strong unit and should and could with the rest of the
free world be a beacon for humanity....This was highjacked if it ever existed
after WW11 with the Rothchilds/zionists agenda to take over the world at
anycost for masters, suspected but yet to be revealed....
It looks like things are coming to a head and we are probably closer to another
falseflag event in the near future......
I have been to Florida four times on holiday and loved it !!! and would go back
again if the opportunity and funds allowed ...Cheers Steve...
red_rose
14th March 2012, 20:07
...didn't Obama describe Cameron as a 'light weight' or something, before Cameron became Prime Minister.
Apparently Cameron has said that he wants to get a basketball hoop for No. 10.
Do people still fall for this bulls*it??
red_rose
Ba-ba-Ra
14th March 2012, 20:36
The military creates killers, loads them up with prescription cocktails and then acts surprised when they kill.
There is a great movie which makes one think called: "In the Valley of Elam" with Tommie Lee Jones.
Cidersomerset
14th March 2012, 22:47
Your right Red Rose that was before he was told to fall into line probably ....LOL..
WikiLeaks: Barack Obama regarded David Cameron as 'lightweight'
David Cameron was regarded by Barack Obama as a “lightweight” politician following their first meeting, the leaked documents are to disclose.
By Robert Winnett, Deputy Political Editor
6:30AM GMT 30 Nov 2010
The American President was underwhelmed after a private discussion with Mr Cameron in 2008 and his impressions of the Conservative leader were reported in a confidential cable sent by US officials back to Washington.
David Cameron was regarded by Barack Obama as a “lightweight” politician following their first meeting, the leaked documents are to disclose.
The embarrassing memo is among more than 1,000 documents from the American embassy in London that have been leaked and will be released in the coming days.
The Daily Telegraph understands that American officials have already warned Downing Street over the contents of the diplomatic cable. It is thought that they have stressed
that Mr Obama’s opinion of Mr Cameron has changed as the two men have got to know one another better.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/8169382/WikiLeaks-Barack-Obama-regarded-David-Cameron-as-lightweight.html
Maia Gabrial
15th March 2012, 00:52
They forgot to ask me! Make that 89%...!
Lifebringer
15th March 2012, 00:56
80% of baggers want to see him impeached. They are a maladjusted bunch. i keep praying they wake up and realize, we are all special, not just the "real Murkins."
I'm sorry but sometimes, it's really upsetting to have political in a spiritual relm for ascension and discussion. Every other cotton pickin site is about the election, why do you keep dragging this political election anchor around people's positivity?
Maia Gabrial
16th March 2012, 23:30
80% of baggers want to see him impeached. They are a maladjusted bunch. i keep praying they wake up and realize, we are all special, not just the "real Murkins."
I'm sorry but sometimes, it's really upsetting to have political in a spiritual relm for ascension and discussion. Every other cotton pickin site is about the election, why do you keep dragging this political election anchor around people's positivity?
It's not necessary to call anyone maladjusted here. You should know that Avalon is not JUST a spiritual realm. It encompasses EVERYTHING of interest to us. It's only natural that we share what we're concerned about; especially in politics because of what it's doing to our world. How else would we get the messages out there, if we don't speak of them?
Lifebringer, IMO you don't sound very positive yourself...You'll be fine if you avoid the political threads....
foreverfan
16th March 2012, 23:49
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0xwCEJJys0M/TTYOg4Wh0gI/AAAAAAAAAuM/kArBL0vYvOM/s1600/homer-doh2.jpg
mojo
17th March 2012, 00:11
sad the mainstream media doesnt say a word...actually that speaks volumes...
jorr lundstrom
17th March 2012, 00:26
The whole press conference. 1 hrs 21 min LOL
vjzAH2DhydA
All is well
Jorr
crested-duck
17th March 2012, 11:58
March 17th 2012 • 8:00AM
Daily Report
The cowards and fools who failed to see through Obama's latest impeachable offense- lying about his intent to support an Israeli attack on Iran- better change their tune now and constitutionally remove him out of office. http://larouchepac.com/node/22044
Fundy Gemini
17th March 2012, 15:44
The latest executive order issued yesterday does NOT leave one with hope of positive change.
In fact, it sounds every bit just the oposite...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness
spiritguide
17th March 2012, 16:39
This law has been in effect many years and the executive order just amended it to include the role of the homeland security department. This is not an indication of anything positive or negative it is just an insurance that in a national emergency the government has what is needed to correct the problem. Think of WW2 and the war production that supplied the troops with necessary items to complete their mission. The materials didn't drop out of the sky and assemble themselves into defense items and supplies. Good educational material though, thank you!
:peace:
TargeT
17th March 2012, 17:44
So, right now?
On September 11, 2001, the government declared a state of emergency. That declared state of emergency was formally put in writing on 9/14/2001:
"A national emergency exists by reason of the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center, New York, New York, and the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, I hereby declare that the national emergency has existed since September 11, 2001 . . . ."
That declared state of emergency has continued in full force and effect from 9/11 [throughout the Bush administration] to the present.
On September 10 2009, President Obama continued the state of emergency:
The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2009, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17545
Snowbird
17th March 2012, 20:06
"Ye shall know them by their fruits." It was time for Obama to be removed from office over two years ago.
meat suit
17th March 2012, 20:32
thing is, the real Obama may be bummed by reptoids on Montserrat.......
Lost Soul
17th March 2012, 20:51
I wonder if there are any blind followers of Mocha HaySeuss still here to defend him. I have long maintained that he was a pawn to TPTW.
crested-duck
19th March 2012, 01:31
"Mocha Hay Seuss"--That's great, I'm still laughing as I type this !
jackovesk
19th March 2012, 01:56
Impeach the Bastard..!
10 Controversial Facts In The Obama Deception That Are Now Self-Evident
http://www.prisonplanet.com/10-controversial-facts-in-the-obama-deception-that-are-now-self-evident.html
New Obama Executive Order Seizes U.S. Infrastructure and Citizens for Military Preparedness
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-obama-executive-order-seizes-u-s-infrastructure-and-citizens-for-military-preparedness.html
Obama Implementing Martial Law Coup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kslFCUGSR1o&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kslFCUGSR1o&feature=player_embedded
mojo
19th March 2012, 02:05
If we can believe the prior posting of Obama talking on the phone and saying that the powers that be want Romney in next does it really matter? I think not. Maybe the true power does not lie in the Presidency but the forces that put the man they want in office. Better we take a man off the street with no prior political power that will stand and truly represent the people. I would take someone like Alex Jones over any of them.
DreamsInDigital
20th March 2012, 01:17
I was given this link, and felt it needs to be shared. Looks like we just might have some Terrestrial Heros Left in This Country.
U.S. Attorney Generals Rising Up: Calling Into Account 21 Illegal Obama Administration Violations!
http://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/506px-seal_of_texas_attorney_general-svg.png?w=300&h=300
MEMO: A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law
FROM: Attorneys General Tom Horne, Arizona; Pam Bondi, Florida; Sam Olens, Georgia; Bill Schuette, Michigan; Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma; Marty Jackley, South Dakota; Alan Wilson, South Carolina; Greg Abbott, Texas; Ken Cuccinelli, Virginia
Introduction
As chief legal officers of the states and commonwealths, attorneys general are the last line of defense against an increasingly overreaching federal government. Attorneys general have a duty to uphold the laws of their respective states and uphold the U.S. and state constitutions.
One of the ways in which attorneys general protect the integrity of state laws and constitutions is by carefully reviewing the actions of the federal government and responding when they break the law or overstep the bounds of the Constitution.
Federalism is the division of authority between the federal and state governments that the Founding Fathers created to provide a check on federal power so that the federal government would not become destructive of the very liberty it was instituted to protect.
While some naïvely argue that the Constitution should “evolve” due to the fact that our Founders could not have foreseen the issues faced by our country today, they forget that the Founders faced tyranny firsthand and understood it well. This led to the creation of a Constitution that relies on limited government, precisely to protect our citizens from today’s unprecedented overstepping of the “division of authority.”
Article Continues Here. (http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/03/19/u-s-attorney-generals-rising-up-calling-into-account-illegal-obama-administration-violations/)
Solstyse
20th March 2012, 02:45
In the month of February Barak Obama raised 35 million dollars for his campaign.
This is exactly what is wrong with our governmental system.
The majority of the donations aren't listed, or are from anonymous sources.
Now, from personal experience , you don't give someone money without expecting something in return.
We as the American people, have the right to know who is buying our president.
Let's not even get into the fact of how much good that 35 million could do for our country right now.
Ok, actually lets get into it. :)
Could build 7,000 brand new 1,500 square feet house.
Or fix up 12,000 condemned house ( new electrical work, plumbing, windows, siding ect)
Could buy around 2,700 brand new cars ( reasonably priced new cars, no corvettes or anything)
Or pay for a years worth of groceries for 11,200 people.
Instead it is going to be used to lie the American people.
Besmirch other equally corrupt politicians.
Gas prices are up 6% In February. They are closing down oil refineries in the west coast, cause they aren't making money.
They are already threatening power outages and possible gas shortages as early as June.
The Dollar is in the toilet.
Unemployment Is at a steady 8.3 percent ( I think that number is much lower than reality )
And these guys are raking in money hand over fist.
And that is just one month, by the time all is said and done, he would of raised more then 1 billion dollars for his campaign.
It is hard for a group of people who make around 30k a year to fight against a system that is raising 35 million a month.
:rant::rant::rant:
I feel better. Thanks for listening
Cilka
20th March 2012, 03:07
That does not mean that he will win. Actually, what is so interesting is that no one, not even those who use remote viewing, is able to predict who will win the election. For some reason there is something in the way in seeing the future of this event. It will be interesting to see who will get the chance to mess up this world even more.
humanalien
20th March 2012, 03:52
He probably didn't raise it, his banker friends just gave it to him.
ThePythonicCow
20th March 2012, 09:11
Some good news - thanks :).
Mulder
20th March 2012, 09:19
This reminds me of G Bush's "impeachment" by Dennis Kucinich - what a charade. It happened just as bush was leaving office & he actually left before being impeached - but when I do some tiny thing like not pay a fine - within a month I face the music. Shows the law is only to enslave us, while our rulers do as they please. All this is a charade and not much will come from it.
BlueEyedPersian
20th March 2012, 16:48
7SGWH3kirzg
http://www.inquisitr.com/206017/president-obama-signs-anti-protest-bill-h-r-347/
President Obama signed bill H.R. 347 (also known as the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011) into law on March 9th, amid numerous protests from the Occupy movement, as well as other agencies. HR 347 is a modification from Senate bill S. 1794, which restricted people from entering or blocking public areas that have been closed off by Secret Service while a person under their protection is passing through. The law also included major public events, such as the Inaguration and Presidential campaigns.
The new law, which passed the House with a vote of 399-3, extends the original law by adding more protected areas within Washington D.C, and removing the word “willfully,” from the paragraph stating that protesters can be prosecuted if they enter the area “willfully and knowingly.”
Representative Justin Amash, R-Michigan, explains this change by saying:
“ The bill expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect its illegal.”
Occupy DC protesters are calling the modifications an infringement on their First Amendment rights, because of the areas of D.C. that have been added to the protected areas portion of the act. Approximately 80 protesters organized a silent march to symbolize their Freedom of Speech being taken away–some even taped their mouths closed to visually show their feelings about the bill. The part of the Bill of Rights they are referring to is the following:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Michael Mahaffey, Representative Tom Rooney’s (R-Fla. and the man responsible for introducing the bill to the House) communication director dismissed concerns that the bill violates civil liberties by saying, that the protests against H.R. 347 are, “a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing. This (HR 347) doesn’t affect anyone’s right to protest anywhere at any time. Ever. ” He went on to say that, “… right now it’s not a federal violation to jump the fence and run across the White House lawn, this bill makes it a federal violation.”
http://i.imgur.com/7vORI.png
Realeyes
20th March 2012, 16:56
Gosh, Obama has certainly been busy playing 'god' over others! It is a modern day 'Animal Farm' scenario.
God help America and its people.
Thanks for posting BlueEyedPersian
Solstyse
20th March 2012, 17:31
I think it is time to start putting my efforts into researching how to successfully get out of this country as soon as possible.
Any Canadians need an ugly inside and out, pigheaded American husband? :)
I work hard and can pick up really heavy things.
Just another step towards , when SHTF, we are all going to jail.
sigma6
21st March 2012, 00:31
Thought this might help people see why the Obama B.C. issue is a bit of a canard, and why they don't bring it into court. Not because it is illegal (or should I say unlawful?) but because it would expose the underlying dynamics of how they are really operating... - ie. I believe he would be found 'not guilty' (as opposed to 'innocent', there's a difference btw...)
In any event, why would this be? Because it is perfectly legal for someone not born in the U.S to be the 'President' of a U.S. corporation. But, if he was found to be 'not guilty' - that would be letting the cat out of the bag, it would expose the whole commercial statutory system (based on benefits and privileges which can be taken away, ie you are much like an employee working for an employer!) in stark contrast to the common law constitutional system... (where you have inalienable rights)... so they (the government) know they are in no danger 'legally' but they also don't want to expose their game, nor educate the public either...
And in case you are wondering... most of us (like 99%) are caught up in the 'commercial' statutory world' (we gave up our rights, by improperly 'signing' a bunch of 'contracts' like SIN/ Health cards, Driver's License, etc.... note: try signing with "all rights reserved, for:[autograph]" and watch the government flip out!) combined with no one having a proper education of what their real rights are (maxim of law: He who sleeps on his rights, has none, period) and think about it, they even warned us... I remember someone telling my me their lawyer told them "never sign anything!..." (and yes he did mean that literally... and again, what that all entails is another story...)
Anyhow, if you see the implications of what is being said here, this should totally blow you out of the water... especially if this is the first time you have been exposed to this type of information...
... it means (for one thing) that the idea of having a separate commercial entity operating concurrently with the constitution, (one thing superimposed over another) was always in the cards, (and even possibly necessary for the government to operate commercially) but somehow these legal 'pirates' have managed to shanghai the 'ship' and drag everyone living on the 'land' into their world of admiralty jurisdiction (the law of the sea, commerce) and thus try and get us to 'forgo' our inalienable rights for a pittance (commercially administered benefits) statutory laws were originally meant to protect free men and women from 'government employees' (...think of the SSN as an 'employee' number...a legal entity in commerce... oops!)
... A lot of people interpret this to mean we have no rights and we are all 'caught' in a trap... well yes and no, not necessarily, for if one were truly educated in their constitutional rights, and understood everything about contracts, and finally the (private/public) trust law system that is overarching all of this, (you'd be a lawyer! - lol) then we could become the master's that we are, and put the servants (government servants ) to task... and one would be able to differentiate between a 'statute' and a 'law' and that too is another story... ...this is the very 'matrix' and 'rabbit hole' 'the' movie alludes to... it goes back generations... (and perhaps centuries and millenia as per Ring of Power/ Empire Of The City - World Superstate) ...and explains a lot ie. US/British military relationship, why Britain started lending money to US immediately after the 'Revolution', etc.
Winston Shrout - History of origin of US presidency and how it sheds light on Obama's 'game' regarding the B.C. issue
http://www.4shared.com/folder/QjKmduM_/Obamas_BC__The_Constitution.html
Arrowwind
21st March 2012, 00:56
I never gave the Obama birth certificate thing much creedence until recently..
now I believe it to be a complete fraud.
since they list him as being born in a hospital in Hawaii that did not exist at the time in a name of a hospital that now exists, the result of a merger of a hospital an a clinic that did exist at the time of his birth, both with different names.... so why is not the real name of the real place on that paper? and then they list his father being from a country that did not exist at the time , Kenya was not called Kenya till some years after 1961.
some pretty serious screw ups for a forgery. What idiot could have done such a poor job at it anyway?
Paranormal
21st March 2012, 01:56
I've been following this and I'm listening to Sean Morton's radio show now & he's talking about it. I found out Obama's certificate has a "wrong" number. His number was EARLIER than other certificates in Hawaii for babies born after him (ie, his number should be greater than birth certificates of babies younger than him!)
Operator
21st March 2012, 03:25
some pretty serious screw ups for a forgery. What idiot could have done such a poor job at it anyway?
If you ask me they deliberately want people to find it ... (perhaps the masses are so much asleep they can't get them to wake up).
There are so many breadcrumbs in the trail, somebody wants you to find the way home.
One plausible explanation I heard recently is that they want a solid lead up to changing the constitution and while at it change a whole lot more.
So make a lot of stuff legal as we go ...
Although I have a feeling they don't bother at all about constitution anymore looking at the signing of the recent executive order :confused:
sigma6
21st March 2012, 10:32
I've been following this and I'm listening to Sean Morton's radio show now & he's talking about it. I found out Obama's certificate has a "wrong" number. His number was EARLIER than other certificates in Hawaii for babies born after him (ie, his number should be greater than birth certificates of babies younger than him!)
I was watching 'JOHN CARTER' the movie, and funny, the scene where he is reading the 'telegram' near the beginning of the movie. The first thing that shouted at me was 'computer printout!!' It's like the continuity people were so young they probably didn't know what an old typewriter type font and kern would have looked like (LOL) - that was sad, considering the budget. oh well... To the best of my understanding the Birth Certificate (BC) is a 'derivative' or 'extraction' of the 'Statement of Live Birth' (SOLB) document, all of which, are forms of 'legal property' and 'trust instruments', the extracted BC in particular was created and is owned by the Government with an entirely different trust relationship then the document it was derived from (SOLB), it's not yours, you only have beneficial 'use' of it in a subtle and hidden trust relationship... and in the strictest legal sense it is not even considered a form of identity (this we have solid) BUT is used as a foundation document to CREATE 'identity'... which legally means you have attached yourself to a corporate 'person' as a trustee w/ liability and surety for every legal account created from it. And yet at the end of the day, since it is their 'property' they can do whatever they want with it.
East Sun
21st March 2012, 14:57
Bill HR 3200 Sec. 2521 P. 1001
RFTID--Radio Tracking Identification Device.
The plan to micro chip everyone in the US is underway.
I know this has been discussed before but how many know that it is already the law and we have until March 23 2013 to stop it.
This device would have all information about you and more than you would want as in control and manipulation of your self and every other person.
What is the root cause of these things? We need to put on our thinking caps. Who are they who are in control? There are many theories with a certain amount of truth in all, I would expect.
I keep wondering about the time we are in as it meshes with so many things including as far out things as (pun) ETs.
I feel like we are trying to keep back the ocean and have no walls built.
I'm thinking of our children's children as I'm at that age. I'd like to be here long enough to see what happens. I plan to be.
risveglio
21st March 2012, 15:06
HR 3200 was not passed. HR 3590 was the Healthcare bill. We don't have to worry about being chipped by the government. Just have to worry about everything else they are doing.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp
East Sun
21st March 2012, 15:36
Oops! Did I jump the gun here? I got my info. from a reliable friend and checked it out on (Yeah, I know) U Tube.
But I still think micro chipping is a real threat and something we should keep up on. It is part of a plan for the not too distant future, I believe.
Was that false alarm an anti Obama technique?
I'm becoming aware of a 'trend' in putting laws through. First they state something they intend to do, then people object so they withdraw their intention. Then later it is pushed through without a problem.
This is confusing.:confused:
jackovesk
21st March 2012, 15:49
What is the ultimate US destination for Obama's "this is what change looks like"? An ex KGB agent discusses what Communist plans for the US are going to be. What do you think of this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA&feature=player_embedded
truth4me
21st March 2012, 16:10
Great video jackovesk!----- yes, all that's in that video is right up our alley.....
galilava
21st March 2012, 16:56
Thank you - the thanks button being not enough!
Indeed I have the feeling for some time now that America is heading towards the same place where we are trying to come back from... (I am from the former Eastern Block)
M6*
21st March 2012, 17:17
Hi East Sun!
It IS confusing, but I think you are serving your country well when you are vigilant.
Keep up the good work! M6*
778 neighbour of some guy
21st March 2012, 17:54
Yuri Bezmenov, great interview, why dont you post the whole thing here, there is also a great lecture from him on u tube, it gives a bit more context to his diversion tactics story.
gooty64
21st March 2012, 18:37
America has been demoralized. I don't mean in the literal religious sense of de-moral-ization.
I mean in the sense where your heart sinks and you lower your expectations, dreams and hopes.
Or you just unwittingly make the best of a crappy situation.
This was set in motion and etched in stone with the 1960's assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK.
galilava
21st March 2012, 18:39
Bezmenov is right in so many ways... but it may be a bit too late for the western society to turn back to Feith - at the end of his lecture (given in 1983) he may sound today like an agent of the Vatican.
Here is the whole lecture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g&feature=related
I hope it will be intreresting to others as it was to me.
Kerrigan
21st March 2012, 21:38
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c392/miss_rock_star/work/comradeobama.jpg
kcbc2010
21st March 2012, 23:22
I also used to think that the birthers were nutters until I read http://www.rense.com/general94/isthere.htm
It asked some questions that I had been afraid say out loud. Also, just given the scrutiny of GWB , I've been wanting to see the grades and the hear from the disgruntled old girlfriends. It's just odd that there's always one more piece of the story coming out and it seems like we never get any straight answers. Regardless of whether you liked GWB, you, at least, could get a timeline for where he was and what he was doing when. I never had a good feeling about Obama and it's because of this kind of stuff. It's really like the lady who really doesn't want to admit that her man's having an affair because then she'd have to do something about it.
Yes, I do understand that there are Obama supporters on PA and I'm really not trying to offend anyone. However, it's this sort of thing that makes me think something kind of shady going on.
I always try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but he's never answered the questions in a way that really puts the matter to rest and the fact that so many people have the same questions would be bothersome to most reasonable people. People can deal with something like GWB having pronunciation issues. However, w/Obama there's a substantial body of evidence (that continues to grow) that this guy is a sham who's being propped up by his handlers.
My problem isn't him, personally, but I do care if he's defrauding the American people and the entire world by claiming to be someone or something he's not. As fellow truth-seekers, I would ask Obama supporters on PA to respect those of us who are asking these questions, instead of dismissing people's legitimate concerns. My instinct tells me this guy is a fraud.
jagman
22nd March 2012, 20:04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CD7JBVnMOGk
Cidersomerset
22nd March 2012, 20:11
'Up The Posties !!!!'.................One important note from the postmans testimony is
that most of the job is mundane so when something changes the routine like you
have a query, or someone asks you directions, or someother event takes your
attention it stays with you. ...Something like a striking youngman telling you
he is going to be President of the United States , would stay in the back of your
mind perminantly !!!
Also another out of the box validation for part of Andy Basiago Story !!
James Martinez said that Walter Bowart thought part of Andys Story
is true.....Which opens up a whole new set of possiblitites that all these
last three presidents have been hand picked !! Which many believe..
kreagle
22nd March 2012, 20:27
Glad you posted this, in that I was just about to do the same using a different website with basically same information. I have linked a good article on this for those of you who wish to look further. Scroll down this article to the part about Obama's Selective Service Card and watch the video. It's dastardly what "they", TPTB, have done and have been endeavoring to hide from us for a long time. I certainly hope they get nailed and that Obama's "rug of deceit" is finally pulled off and he is exposed for what he is, a fraud!!!
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joe-tons-more-shocking-obama-info/?cat_orig=us
Carmody
22nd March 2012, 23:40
Leaders of countries have been hand selected and placed in their given positions, by a hidden elite - for thousands of years. At a minimum.
Welcome to the real world.
jagman
22nd March 2012, 23:45
Just for fun, I did a search on the computer on if there was ever a setting President that was arrested? Yes there was! Andrew Jackson
was arrested while in office for speeding on a horse in town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZEOGJJ7UKFM
Maia Gabrial
23rd March 2012, 14:19
The Ayers are traitors in this and I hope they get prosecuted. Maybe they'll even sing the names of all those connected to this. As for President BO (Peee yew!) the dragnet is closing in around him. Think he'll try to take a jumproom off the planet to escape HIS prosecution?
jackovesk
23rd March 2012, 15:03
Rips 'Biggest censorship Blackout in the history of the United States'
WND
22nd March 2012
“America’s Toughest Sheriff” says there is “tons” more potentially shocking information on Barack Obama in connection with his probe into the president’s eligibility, and he calls the media’s suppression of his findings of a likely forged presidential birth certificate and Selective Service Card “probably the biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States.”
“I’m not going after the president to keep him off a ballot or anything else, but that could happen,” Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio said. “I’m going at it strictly as a law-enforcement guy investigating a possible forgery and fraud. I’m sticking with that, but I’ll tell you one thing. We got tons of other information that could be very shocking, too, but I’m sticking now with just the [forgery] investigation and possible criminal violations.”
The lawman from Maricopa County made the comments March 16 on a national radio show hosted by Roger Hedgecock. (Scroll down for video.)
Help Sheriff Joe blow the lid off Obama’s fraud. Join the Cold Case Posse right now!
As WND reported March 1, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause indicating the documents released by the White House last April purported to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration card are actually forgeries.
Read the preliminary findings of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.
He stressed on the radio show his original intent with the posse was to put to rest all the claims suggesting Obama was not meeting the constitutional requirements to hold the presidency.
“I told these guys, ‘I want you to do a good job. I hope we clear the president,’” he explained. “I said give me the microfiche in Hawaii to show that he was born in that hospital. Give us the microfiche. I said that six months ago. And that would clear everything up. But as we went into it with an open mind, now we’re coming to a conclusion that we may have some forged documents revolving around this situation.”
When asked about making an arrest, Arpaio said, “We’re trying to identify any alleged forger. We haven’t done that yet. … I’m not blaming the president, but if they’re forged, someone has to be responsible for doing that.”
The sheriff also said that on Friday, he made a decision about where to send Obama’s Selective Service Card in order to have that agency “help us or do an independent investigation.”
“We have nothing to hide. We’re bringing it to their attention, and see what happens,” Arpaio said. “My problem is, there’s a lot of conflicts out here to get somebody to look into this. [Regarding] the media … this is probably the biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States. When I go to the toilet, I make it in national news. … I just can’t believe the media, including the cable media blocking this thing out.”
Today, Arpaio issued a statement saying he sent his request for assistance to the U.S. Selective Service System, asking its director, Lawrence Romo, to respond to him within 30 days on whether or not his national office will provide the sheriff with the original document, and if that office will move forward with an investigation of its own.
On Hedgecock’s radio show, Arpaio noted:
“I guess common sense would be to send it to them. The Selective Service director is appointed by the president. … They only have 136 employees in the whole organization. I presume if I did that, what do you think they’re gonna to do with it? The director who was appointed from San Antonio, Texas, eight months into the Obama administration, what do you think he’s gonna do? He’s probably gonna call some guy at the White House if he can get up to the chief of staff to ask some advice, and then what are they gonna do? Give it to the attorney general? I don’t know. … So I’m fighting big battles here.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9H45XI4wxw&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9H45XI4wxw&feature=player_embedded
Arpaio made special note about the issue of Obama’s possibly forged Selective Service Card.
“We had a press conference. A lot of people came. They were snickering, trying to embarrass me, [saying] this is a pony show trying to get publicity,” he said. “However, when we showed the Selective Service Card on the screen, you could hear a pin drop.”
Because of inconsistencies on the form itself – including an unusually incomplete date stamp – sheriff’s investigators suspect the form, which was allegedly filled out in Honolulu in 1980, may be a forgery.
WND is reporting today that Arpaio is seeking Obama’s original registration card from Selective Service.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHAM3hRI8_Y&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHAM3hRI8_Y&feature=player_embedded
Sheriff’s investigators were able to replicate the alleged forgery by obtaining a circa 1980 pica stamp and a circa “2008″ date plug. Investigators were able to clearly demonstrate the “80″ (which should have actually read 1980) in Obama’s Selective Service Registration form resulted from cutting out the “08″ from an authentic “2008″ date plug, and inverting the “08″ to read “80″ when the cut plug was loaded into the year slot on the 1980 pica stamp.
Meanwhile, although Arpaio did not focus on Obama’s Social Security Number at his news conference, WND has also reported the president may be using a fraudulent number, another important piece of information the national news media continue to suppress.
Follow all the future developments in this story – sign up for WND’s email news alerts right now!
The Arpaio findings are not the only items the media are refusing to cover. As WND reported yesterday, a full-blown cover-up appears to be taking place in connection with WND’s disclosure about a retired U.S. postman who has signed a sworn affidavit suggesting Obama was a foreign-born student who was receiving financial help to go to Harvard from the parents of domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.
See excerpts of WND’s interviews with mailman Allen Hulton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbUeMFaM9mg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbUeMFaM9mg
Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse began its investigation in August after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition asking him to undertake the investigation. The tea partiers indicated if a forged birth certificate had been used to place Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
Then last December, Obama’s Justice Department held its own news conference to claim Arpaio’s office committed civil-rights violations against Hispanics, including racial profiling and heavy-handed immigration patrols based on racially charged complaints.
When asked about that during Friday’s radio show, Arpaio said, “They want to control my organization, [imposing] monitors and everything else. I’m not gonna go for that. So I guess they’ll sue me and we’ll go to court and put the real facts out. The real facts that they’re going to have to come up with including all their so-called witnesses that they won’t identify. They won’t give us anything.”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joe-tons-more-shocking-obama-info/
PS - There's some HOPE over there beyond that there Horizon, Yes-Siree..! :yes4:
That ye 'Smoking :flame:Gun' is startin to billow the smoke of 'Truth' ...:)
There's a new 'Sherriff' in town and he's comin to getya Barry..! :yo:
kcbc2010
24th March 2012, 18:32
Yes, I realize this is a serious charge. No, I don't buy the storyline we've been given about Pres. Obama. We need to understand who this man is. People are well w/in their rights to disagree with me. Look at the evidence. Decide for yourself what's true and what isn't.
http://gulagbound.com/27615/did-obama-assassinate-clinton-delegates/
Also, as this article proves, if you aren't reading the Ulsterman Report, then you are missing a lot. WHI (White House Insider) and WSI (Wall Street Insider) know their s-t and have timely information. I've been following them for months now, so I'm speaking from experience, not just what I've heard from a friend of a friend of a friend....
ThePythonicCow
25th March 2012, 04:30
I get the sense they are getting in your face bold with the corruption, killing, stealing, ... like they are actually trying to see how ugly they can make it.
Lifebringer
25th March 2012, 22:22
this is bull pucky. If they did start the birther crap, it would fit right in with Goldwater loolubelles. I was following this guy like a thong sing 2004, the Clintons were just pissed because she found out, like other persuasions, that she was not the "entitled candidate and you can't lie and say you were in sniper fire, with over 30 witnesses who say it was just a little girl from a leader presenting Hillary with flowers.
She exaggerated and intimated that where she landed was active war zone, when it was not.
At the time American Voters had told the Democrats, especially the ones voting for the Iraq war, "ONE LIE, and you're OUTTA THERE. We told em WE were cleaning house, and WE did. WE're not finished yet, but it's looking much better in the Party than in 2004. Threw out the corporate helath insurance bluedogs in 2006, replaced em with progressives since they cross party lines and aren't afraid to stand up for the PEOPLE. In 2010 the excuse me "causian people who are a little on the lower frequency and too lazy to read about what's going on, found out that all that debt was caused by Republican Party, and put some tea, in John Boehner's boubon on the rocks.
Honestly, as the Senator Obama train pulled out powered by those who were there when he announced, we've been picking up passengers from both parties who want progress, PERIOD.
As you can see, it's like pulling teeth, and when the Prez scores one on their incompetent behinds, they lie, call him more names, and get red in the face. it's like watching a tea bagging exorcism.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Que que ce, paranoid, maybe a little 'wishful thinking."
NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
See you at the polls.
Snowbird
26th March 2012, 00:25
this is bull pucky. If they did start the birther crap, it would fit right in with Goldwater loolubelles. I was following this guy like a thong sing 2004, the Clintons were just pissed because she found out, like other persuasions, that she was not the "entitled candidate and you can't lie and say you were in sniper fire, with over 30 witnesses who say it was just a little girl from a leader presenting Hillary with flowers.
She exaggerated and intimated that where she landed was active war zone, when it was not.
At the time American Voters had told the Democrats, especially the ones voting for the Iraq war, "ONE LIE, and you're OUTTA THERE. We told em WE were cleaning house, and WE did. WE're not finished yet, but it's looking much better in the Party than in 2004. Threw out the corporate helath insurance bluedogs in 2006, replaced em with progressives since they cross party lines and aren't afraid to stand up for the PEOPLE. In 2010 the excuse me "causian people who are a little on the lower frequency and too lazy to read about what's going on, found out that all that debt was caused by Republican Party, and put some tea, in John Boehner's boubon on the rocks.
Honestly, as the Senator Obama train pulled out powered by those who were there when he announced, we've been picking up passengers from both parties who want progress, PERIOD.
As you can see, it's like pulling teeth, and when the Prez scores one on their incompetent behinds, they lie, call him more names, and get red in the face. it's like watching a tea bagging exorcism.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Que que ce, paranoid, maybe a little 'wishful thinking."
NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
See you at the polls.
Oh my dear God, it is more than obvious that this is an election year. They're out in force.
:fie: :faint2:
gooty64
26th March 2012, 00:31
erm what?
See you at the polls.
Still voting for for American Presidents? Really?
Black Panther
26th March 2012, 17:53
Obama has a lot of close allies. I think they are all lies :rolleyes:
erYpXzE9Pxs
A lot of same words too in his State of the Union Speeches in 2010, 2011, and 2012:
Akw3nk6eCz0
DreamsInDigital
26th March 2012, 17:59
Obama's only ally is Israel, the others will turn on him the first chance they get.
percival tyro
26th March 2012, 18:22
He's as punch drunk as Bush.We should put them together in a lying contest. 9-11 minute rounds.
DeDukshyn
26th March 2012, 18:29
Puppetry has no value for me. Obama this Obama that -- before that it was Bush this Bush that. Any president has merely been a puppet for many many decades. The controllers just make sure that about 60% like himand 40% hate him at the start and 70 percent hate him and 30 like him on the way out. Then a new president is chosen to feed into that 70 percent that hated the last president, therefore ensuring that the duality in Amercians minds is about as strong as it can possibly be. This process also creates fanboys of extreme proportions (fanboy is someone who will say that "thier" thing (whatever it may be), is the best always the best, right - and always right, and the ultimate winner even when the opposite at the time may be 100% the reality - but you can't convince them otherwise). so you basically end up with two groups of emotionally attached people. You please one for a while - then when the masses they get unruly or the other group gets louder, switch to please the opposite. And over ad infinitum. Meanwhile the only things that move forward under this watch is corporate interests while the middle class are systematically removed. It's been working tremendously well -- everyone is too busy arguing about whether Obama or Bush or whoever is "good" or "bad" (the fanboyism), so the attention never goes past that point into understanding what is really happening. Thus I pay no attention to what "presidents" do -- they do almost nothing in the grand scheme of things. My 2 cents ;)
jackovesk
26th March 2012, 18:45
WHOOPS: President Obama Caught On Microphone Telling Russian President That Things Will Change AFTER He Wins Re-Election
Joe Weisenthal
Business Insider
March 26, 2012
Whoops.
President Obama was caught on a hot mic (live mic) telling Russian President Medvedv the truth: He’ll have more flexibility on security issues AFTER he wins re-relection.
Jake Tapper at ABC (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/president-obama-asks-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense-after-my-election-i-have-more-flexibility/) has the exchange...
http://static7.businessinsider.com/image/4b698f5e0000000000459637/obama-medvedev.jpg
President Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.
President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
President Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.
Of course, nobody should be surprised by this: This is just reality. But normally politicians aren’t heard spelling out reality so clearly.
Check out a video of the exchange below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYGsadcBiFA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYGsadcBiFA
http://www.businessinsider.com/whoops-president-obama-caught-on-mic-telling-russian-president-that-things-will-change-after-he-wins-re-election-2012-3
PS - Would'nt jump the gun too soon Barry :nono: after 'Double Crossing' the Elite..!
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?42923-New-Breaking-News-Lindsey-Williams-on-Alex-Jones-3-25-2012
Phoenix
26th March 2012, 18:48
This means nothing. It is such a general thing to say...
gripreaper
26th March 2012, 18:49
So, the whole election process, all the caucuses, debates and such are just circus side shows and mean nothing? Obama is already president for the next term?
Yup. pretty much...
Cidersomerset
26th March 2012, 19:15
Yes of course its been fixed for the last five Presidents at least ....
ub1p__Rnvzc
I've posted a couple of David Ickes vids this afternoon and almost posted
this one but it fits in here....Steve
im awake
26th March 2012, 20:14
Was the bigger threat from Osama or from Obama?
Military bases from Chagos to Okinawa
I say things that other rappers won’t say
Cause my mind never closed like Guantanamo Bay
Hope you didn’t build a statue or tattoo your arm
Cause the drones are still flying over Pashtunistan
Did he defend the war? No! He extended more
He even had the time to attempt a coup in Ecuador
Morales and Chavez, the state’s are on a hunt for ya
Military now stationed on bases in Columbia
Take a trip to the past and tell em I was right
Ask Ali Abunimah or Jeremiah Wright
Drones over Pakistan, Yemen and Libya
Is Obama the bomber getting ready for Syria?
First black president, the masses were hungry
But the same president just bombed an african country - lowkey
Black Panther
26th March 2012, 20:28
Puppetry has no value for me. Obama this Obama that -- before that it was Bush this Bush that. Any president has merely been a puppet for many many decades. The controllers just make sure that about 60% like himand 40% hate him at the start and 70 percent hate him and 30 like him on the way out. Then a new president is chosen to feed into that 70 percent that hated the last president, therefore ensuring that the duality in Amercians minds is about as strong as it can possibly be. This process also creates fanboys of extreme proportions (fanboy is someone who will say that "thier" thing (whatever it may be), is the best always the best, right - and always right, and the ultimate winner even when the opposite at the time may be 100% the reality - but you can't convince them otherwise). so you basically end up with two groups of emotionally attached people. You please one for a while - then when the masses they get unruly or the other group gets louder, switch to please the opposite. And over ad infinitum. Meanwhile the only things that move forward under this watch is corporate interests while the middle class are systematically removed. It's been working tremendously well -- everyone is too busy arguing about whether Obama or Bush or whoever is "good" or "bad" (the fanboyism), so the attention never goes past that point into understanding what is really happening. Thus I pay no attention to what "presidents" do -- they do almost nothing in the grand scheme of things. My 2 cents ;)
I think we all agree about the Obama's and the Bushes. They are all puppets
and the real decisions are made behind the curtain. But the first video is a
good one to show people who still believe in the puppetshow and 'vote' for
their presidents.
Cilka
27th March 2012, 00:21
He is way too confident of his winning the election. All psychopaths are confident individuals. That does not mean he is going to win. But then, whoever replaces him will be just as arrogant as he is, or even worse. A decent human being will never become the leader of US or Canada, because majority of people are still asleep.
Black Panther
27th March 2012, 16:54
We'll 'fight' them with music
They can't handle the truth
They can't handle love
:wizard:
Girl POWER!
9eDJ3cuXKV4
truth4me
27th March 2012, 18:26
School transcript released today shows Obama under the name Barry Soetoro received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia. Scroll down when you go to site and as always you be the judge.....
truth24.co.za better yet presscore.ca/2011/?p=2929
RMorgan
27th March 2012, 18:44
Hey mate,
I couldn´t find the article in the link you´ve posted.
Could you please post the link to article itself, instead of the home page?
Thanks! :)
Raf.
Lazlo
27th March 2012, 18:52
The story is from june 18, 2011.
Unfortunately, it didn't gain any traction last year and is unlikely to make a difference now. I really that this this one was truly going to be the smoking gun when it came out but it went nowhere.
RMorgan
27th March 2012, 19:05
Thanks for correcting the link, mate.
Well, I think nobody actually cares about it, since the whole electoral process is a fraud itself.
For me, it´s already proved that he isn´t an US citizen. Anyway, I´m 99% sure that he´ll be re-elected.
Cheers,
Raf.
ThePythonicCow
27th March 2012, 19:38
Is this the same story: http://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/was-obama-born-in-the-usa/?
OBAMA – SMOKING GUN FINALLY FOUND?
April 1, 2009
AP- WASHINGTON D.C. – In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group “Americans for Freedom of Information” has released copies of President Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.
This is dated from April Fool's day of 2009, and is derided as a joke at the above link and at (untrustworthy, in my view) Snopes (http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/occidental.asp).
Ba-ba-Ra
27th March 2012, 19:42
Obama - Romney - etc.,.......all window dressing....same puppet masters.
It's been brought out by someone else (can't remember who on another thread) that possibly the only reason the PTB want Obama again is they already have him trained and it would be easier and faster for them to put their agenda in place, rather than take the time to break in a new puppet.
Until we realize that change is not going to come from the top down, I suspect nothing will change.
Maia Gabrial
27th March 2012, 19:43
Cocky b*stard said after his "re-election"....
peace
27th March 2012, 19:44
This means nothing. It is such a general thing to say...
and it happens all the time, hot mic or no.
modwiz
27th March 2012, 19:51
Yawn, yawn yawn.:yawn:
toad
27th March 2012, 19:53
Thanks for correcting the link, mate.
Well, I think nobody actually cares about it, since the whole electoral process is a fraud itself.
For me, it´s already proved that he isn´t an US citizen. Anyway, I´m 99% sure that he´ll be re-elected.
Cheers,
Raf.
Either that or something ridiculous will happen and he will suspend the elections, and declare himself king. Nothing would surprise me raelly.
Maia Gabrial
28th March 2012, 08:33
Also, I wanted to point out that even Obama himself seems to be saying that the 2012 elections are going to be rigged. He already thinks he won. What a creep....
Wind
28th March 2012, 09:21
Dolores Cannon said that Obama is on the light side. That was quite a surprise to me, I must admit. I have thought that Obama is part of the cabal, but what if he isn't? Maybe he is just pretendng to be. Dolores is one of the few people out there who I trust with my whole heart. I know she could be wrong, but what if?
DeBron
28th March 2012, 12:29
I am not defending anything he has done, but let us be honest. If you were speaking to someone of note, wouldn't you be boastfully confident? You never show timidness or trepedation about anything. Maybe this was meant to get out to show to the electorate(US citizens) that he has no doubts about serving another term.
kemo
28th March 2012, 12:36
Well if he does get re-elected and means or is allowed to do what he implies wouldn't we all like fewer or - for that matter - no nuclear weapons?
PurpleLama
28th March 2012, 12:45
Was the bigger threat from Osama or from Obama?
Military bases from Chagos to Okinawa
I say things that other rappers won’t say
Cause my mind never closed like Guantanamo Bay
Hope you didn’t build a statue or tattoo your arm
Cause the drones are still flying over Pashtunistan
Did he defend the war? No! He extended more
He even had the time to attempt a coup in Ecuador
Morales and Chavez, the state’s are on a hunt for ya
Military now stationed on bases in Columbia
Take a trip to the past and tell em I was right
Ask Ali Abunimah or Jeremiah Wright
Drones over Pakistan, Yemen and Libya
Is Obama the bomber getting ready for Syria?
First black president, the masses were hungry
But the same president just bombed an african country - lowkey
WOW. That was really great! I quoted this into the Here and Now thread, where I gave it an award.
Ernie Nemeth
28th March 2012, 23:28
What was he supposed to say. After I loose the election? Of course he's gonna say when I win the election - When I get re-elected.
Referee
29th March 2012, 05:40
Arizona's Sheriff Looking into the Obama Birth Certificate Asks Why is everyone ignoring this!
Z9fktwKCu50
jackovesk
30th March 2012, 03:21
Thanks Referee...:thumb:
Birther Controversy: Feds Refuse To Release Obama Draft Card
Government agency not cooperating with eligibility investigation
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/03/SSA.jpg
March 29, 2012
A request for original documents by a group investigating the eligibility of president Obama has been turned down by The Selective Service System in a move that is sure to court more controversy.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, leader of the probe into the authenticity of the now notorious Obama birth certificate, announced earlier this month that he had cause to believe that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was also a forgery.
Arpaio asked for a response from the federal agency within 30 days on whether or not it will provide a hard copy of the original document.
The Selective Service System has now replied to the request with a three-sentence letter from the office of Selective Service Director Lawrence G. Romo.
“This Agency has no evidence that President Obama’s 1980 registration is not authentic,” wrote Richard S. Flahavan, associate director of public & intergovernmental affairs.
“However, if you have any credible evidence to the contrary and believe that a Federal crime has been committed, we suggest that it be turned over immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to pursue,” the letter concluded.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/03/responsetoarpaio.jpg
Unsatisfied with the agency’s response, Arpaio has addressed another correspondence to Romo.
“If your office has the original, authentic Selective Service registration form for Barack Obama from July 29, 1980, please indicate whether or not you are in possession of this document,” Arpaio wrote.
“If the document is in your possession, please make it available for inspection by my Sheriff’s Office investigators. We will travel to your facility to analyze it.”
Arpaio asked for a further response from the agency within ten days.
In his original March 19 letter, Arpaio explained that the document location number and several other identifying factors indicate that Obama’s Selective Service Form was created in 2008 and has been altered to appear as if it dates from 1980.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/03/arpaiotoselectiveservice.jpg
The Selective Service System response indicates that, much like Hawaii’s Department of Health in regard to the birth certificate, the agency is refusing to comply with requests to allow public inspection of the original document.
Arpaio has also pointed out that Obama’s original Selective Service registration has previously been released at least twice in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, so it makes no sense for the agency to withhold the document from law enforcement officers and court-approved, forensic experts.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/birther-controversy-feds-refuse-to-release-obama-draft-card.html
Moemers
30th March 2012, 03:48
A person on his staff is writing a book about this.
This whole thing is a PR ploy. Stop discussing it is what I'd do.
jackovesk
30th March 2012, 04:24
A person on his staff is writing a book about this.
This whole thing is a PR ploy. Stop discussing it is what I'd do.
I
G
N
O
R
A
N
C
E
is
B
L
I
S
S
Wherence thyeth ones own remnance of reality...
To scorn the truth is to scorn oneself
Moemers, Moemers, Moemers
Showmers, Showmers, Showmers
Baron to thines own council
Zest without Zill
My friend you consumed the wrong Pill...:)
Eventually - Justice will be Served...:yes4:
Referee
30th March 2012, 06:27
A person on his staff is writing a book about this.
This whole thing is a PR ploy. Stop discussing it is what I'd do.
This is the sort of post that someone on a payroll would type. I do not understand you. Stop talking about the biggest story in American History! WHAT!!!!!!!!
jackovesk
1st April 2012, 05:18
Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama's Records Are Missing + Mike Zullo, Jerome Corsi Full Interviews
Mar 31, 2012
The Obama records which have not been released include;
Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.
State Representative Carl Seel, who introduced the bill, was joined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, State Senator Lori Klein, and others in support of the bill. Important new information was revealed during the news conference including a request by Sheriff Joe Arpaio to the current head of the Selective Service Board to investigate the criminal forgery committed in the case of Barack Obama's Selective Service registration. In addtion, Carl Seel reveals some of the resistance that other Republicans are creating to stop the bill from even heading to a vote.
The bill will require Barack Obama, or any candidate seeking to be on the Arizona ballot, to certify eligibility for the office they are seeking. This will essentially require Barack Obama to certify his eligibility if he wants to be on the ballot this year in Arizona. This could potentially be a game-changing piece of legislation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5K6svnrI4&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg&index=4&feature=plcp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5K6svnrI4&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg&index=4&feature=plcp
foreverfan
1st April 2012, 16:16
Wait, Obama is a fake? Imagine that.
mojo
1st April 2012, 16:32
The ones that put him in power knew this and tried to keep it out of the public's eye and Barry went along with it. I'm not sure which is worst?
Maia Gabrial
1st April 2012, 18:48
Tut, tut Obama and chronies. How's the saying go about "webs being weaved when at first we try to deceive?" I'm looking forward to hearing all the other things the Posse found....
I have to applaud the Sheriff and the people of Arizona. These are people who have shown such integrity. They discovered many shocking things about Obama and most likely those who helped him commit these frauds. They could have swept it all under the table as has always been the case. You have to admire their courage to continue in spite of the threats and intimidations.
Don't you just love the way the roaches are running for cover now? You know, I'm having visions of FEMA camps being reserved for the likes of Obama and his conspirators. I wonder if Rockefellers have their hands in this fraud, too...? (What am I thinking? OF COURSE they do!!!)
Applecart
2nd April 2012, 23:30
here's a longer/newer video from infowars
a lot of good info is spelled out here
zk5K6svnrI4
conk
3rd April 2012, 19:29
Don't forget, sherriffs are some of the most powerful law enforcement officers in the USA!
Positive Vibe Merchant
4th April 2012, 00:56
Again Jack, fantastic work!
Great digging!
PVM
jackovesk
6th April 2012, 14:26
April, 2012
Hollywood Producer Bettina Viviano says that the Clintons were the original birthers and people were silenced and threatened. Also talks about voter fraud in the Democrat Primaries.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-MzKvVi1FI&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-MzKvVi1FI&feature=youtu.be
kathymarie
11th April 2012, 02:24
Unbelievable.....I have not heard of her nor of her documentary. Still no media coverage to amount to anything....I just don't understand why not with more and more information coming to light. I have trouble believing the Clintons would keep this secret....I guess I do feel a little better about both of them if they really were trying to protect Chelsea. The Secretary of State appointment for Hillary doesn't seem like a very big payoff.
Do you ever sleep, Jacko?
jackovesk
11th April 2012, 02:32
Unbelievable.....I have not heard of her nor of her documentary. Still no media coverage to amount to anything....I just don't understand why not with more and more information coming to light. I have trouble believing the Clintons would keep this secret....I guess I do feel a little better about both of them if they really were trying to protect Chelsea. The Secretary of State appointment for Hillary doesn't seem like a very big payoff.
Do you ever sleep, Jacko?
Hi kathymarie..:)
Do you ever sleep, Jacko?
My time here is limited, so I am just trying to get out as much 'Truth As I Know It' to as many people as I can...:yes4:
Rgs,
Jack
jackovesk
12th April 2012, 16:20
Obama Impeachment 2012 with Film Director Sean Stone
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Film director, producer, actor and writer Sean Stone has thrown his weight behind a resolution introduced in the House last month by North Carolina Republican Walter Jones. Resolution 107 states that should the president use offensive military force without the authorization of Congress that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR_I9G8gJqE&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR_I9G8gJqE&feature=player_embedded
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-impeachment-2012-with-film-director-sean-stone.html
National Movement Launched To Impeach Obama..!
The five core reasons why Obama should be impeached
Thursday, April 12, 2012
A new national movement has been launched to impeach President Obama based around five core issues which clearly demonstrate how Obama has flagrantly violated the Constitution.
The campaign, backed by director, producer, actor and writer Sean Stone, is a follow-up to North Carolina Republican Walter Jones’ efforts to bring the administration to account for launching unconstitutional wars without the authorization of Congress. Jones’ recently introduced resolution states that such actions represent “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”
The five core reasons for impeachment proceedings to be launched can be summarized as follows;
1) Despite promising otherwise, Barack Obama committed U.S. military resources to overthrow Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi without any kind of congressional authorization whatsoever and without citing any evidence that Libya under Gaddafi was a threat to the security of the United States. Furthermore, Obama brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” Obama churlishly remarked.
2) On New Years Eve 2011, Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act which includes provisions that permit the abduction and military detention without trial of U.S. citizens. Despite Obama claiming he would not use the provisions to incarcerate U.S. citizens, it was his administration that specifically demanded these powers be included in the final NDAA bill.
3) The passage of the Obamacare bill, under which Americans will be forced to buy health insurance, is clearly anathema to the Constitution. “The individual mandate is unprecedented and exceeds Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce. If it is allowed to stand, Congress will be able to impose any kind of economic mandate as part of any kind of national regulatory scheme,” writes Ilya Shapiro, a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.
4) Obama’s role in the economic looting of America since he took office is unprecedented. Specifically, Obama violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chrysler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
5) Finally, Obama’s use of signing statements shows his desire to continue in the vein of George W. Bush and rule by executive fiat. This is a direct violation of Article II of the Constitution.
You can support this effort to get political momentum behind starting the impeachment process against Obama by forwarding this article and video to your network on Facebook, Twitter, You Tube and every other platform of communication.
If the makers of Kony 2012 can receive international viral coverage for putting out a film that was little more than a veiled call for another unconstitutional invasion, this call to impeach Obama deserves equal attention.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/national-movement-launched-to-impeach-obama.html
PS - If you do 'Actually' believe in a 'FREE HUMANITY', get this 'Thread' out to as many of your 'Facebook - Twitter - Friends & Family as you can...:yes4:
Unified Serenity
12th April 2012, 16:34
Of course this only applies if the Constitution is in effect. The Constitution was suspended back in the 1860's when Lincoln declared Marshall Law, and he died before he could rescind it, so we have been under Marshall Law since then and the Constitution is suspended. How can a President or anyone be held accountable legally when it's suspended? Now, this doesn't mean I don't think he should be removed, but the truth and fact of the matter is, we need to end Marshall Law which allows for executive orders etc. and have our Constitution re-instated NOW.
jackovesk
12th April 2012, 17:31
Of course this only applies if the Constitution is in effect. The Constitution was suspended back in the 1860's when Lincoln declared Marshall Law, and he died before he could rescind it, so we have been under Marshall Law since then and the Constitution is suspended. How can a President or anyone be held accountable legally when it's suspended? Now, this doesn't mean I don't think he should be removed, but the truth and fact of the matter is, we need to end Marshall Law which allows for executive orders etc. and have our Constitution re-instated NOW.
What is it US, do you want to get into 'Semantics' or do you want 'Obama' to be 'Impeached'...:confused:
Rendering (ALL) his executive orders 'Null & Void'...:yes4:
I'm damn sure that the 'Progenitors' of this 'Impeach Obama' movement would have thought about everything you have mentioned 'above' and then some...:yes4:
Rgs,
Jack
Cidersomerset
12th April 2012, 20:33
Interresting article on RT....
jMuClfmGrD0
Published on 10 Apr 2012 by RTAmerica
The war on whistleblowers rages on and the Obama administration adds one more causality to the war on government transparency. On Thursday, former CIA official John Kiriakou was indicted for allegedly leaking information to journalists. Kiriakou is no rookie to whistleblowing; he exposed the CIA's use of waterboarding on terror suspects. If convicted, Kiriakou could receive a maximum of 45 years in prison for the five-count indictment including three charges under the Espionage Act.Stephen Kohn, author of The Whistleblower's Handbook, joins us with his take on Kiriakou's case.
U6V34j-1EzY
Fundy Gemini
12th April 2012, 21:15
So Important! THANK YOU
Maia Gabrial
12th April 2012, 21:28
We only have to endure Prez BO until the end of the year. He will be remembered for being a worthless president who almost brought America down.
He should go back to Kenya while he still has a reputation.....
thunder24
12th April 2012, 21:39
We only have to endure Prez BO until the end of the year. He will be remembered for being a worthless president who almost brought America down.
He should go back to Kenya while he still has a reputation.....
if ur still wrapped up in elections and the propaganda of political theater, you might wanna put illuminati, nwo, e.t.'s, skull and bones or maybe freemasonary, corporations, city of london, city of rome or anything along those lines in the search here on avalon or mayb google....idk...its been so long...
peace
ghostrider
12th April 2012, 23:25
the only information allowed out is what we ( the white house) say. everyone else go to jail, your under arrest, we will strip search you and force you to watch CNN 24-7 while sitting in prison/ fema camps. don't make us water board you, we will even chemtrail your mama's house .
frances
12th April 2012, 23:52
Let's hope he is not left to stand alone. Frances.
WhiteFeather
13th April 2012, 01:01
Karma will have its handsome revenge at godspeed with all the ass clowns who run this corrupt organization we call a government. I will meditate upon this becoming fruition. I've had enough of this 3 Ring Circus Act to say the least. Nuff Said. There time is short. So be It.
Ellisa
13th April 2012, 01:10
Posted in wrong place1
Maia Gabrial
13th April 2012, 12:49
if ur still wrapped up in elections and the propaganda of political theater, you might wanna put illuminati, nwo, e.t.'s, skull and bones or maybe freemasonary, corporations, city of london, city of rome or anything along those lines in the search here on avalon or mayb google....idk...its been so long...
I agree with you thunder24. The list is long of all the conspirators and their willing co-conspirators who have scewed up our country and our world.
But Prez BO is doing alot of damage all by himself. He'll go down in infamy, that's for sure. While this a**hole is indicting whistleblowers who have the integrity to expose criminal activities, BO should expect his own indictment as well. Only his will be for treason.....
And since Bush declared this ridiculous WAR on terror, you know what the punishment for treason during war is, right? Death.
Prodigal Son
13th April 2012, 12:55
We only have to endure Prez BO until the end of the year. He will be remembered for being a worthless president who almost brought America down.
He should go back to Kenya while he still has a reputation.....
Every Prez is a powerless puppet. Even the neo-Nazi GHWB took orders from Kissinger. Obama is especially impotent, trained from birth like all the others, dancing to the tune of whatever the CFR, who took orders from the Bilderbergers who took orders from the Committee of 33 who took orders from the Committee of 9 who took orders from the Committee of 3 who took orders from the one or two top jackasses, put him in power. It's doubtful that he even has the authority to take a dump when he wants to. He certainly cannot select his own tie.
Axman
13th April 2012, 13:31
Karma will have its handsome revenge at godspeed with all the ass clowns who run this corrupt organization we call a government. I will meditate upon this becoming fruition. I've had enough of this 3 Ring Circus Act to say the least. Nuff Said. There time is short. So be It.
You called that right Whitefeather if you look into what Obamanation and the now mayor off chicago Emanual where up to they where literal assclowns. But they did get rid of a couple people that came out. Sad Sad world bring on the change.
The Axman
Maia Gabrial
13th April 2012, 13:35
I just can't see NOT holding this puppet and all the others blameless. How is it that someone like Ron Paul can hold onto HIS honor and integrity in the midst of all this corruption? Does this mean that Prez BO is a weak minded being? I read that he sits around the oval office in t-shirt and shorts all day watching video games, Now there's a leader we can admire, right? Does this mean that the highest office in the country is such an easy job that even a monkey could do it? If the secret is that the cabal is really running the show, why aren't the alarm bells going off! If anything needs to go viral it's this....How the heck did this slip by us all this time?
Axman
13th April 2012, 13:42
Not sure how they did it and he came from the state where i live.
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/washington-insider-obama-member-of-chicago-gay-mans-club/
The Axman
truth4me
13th April 2012, 13:49
Karma will have its handsome revenge at godspeed with all the ass clowns who run this corrupt organization we call a government. I will meditate upon this becoming fruition. I've had enough of this 3 Ring Circus Act to say the least. Nuff Said. There time is short. So be It.Your right whitefeather. Karma is coming for those azz clowns. People in general who knowing do others wrong will also get it.
conk
13th April 2012, 14:02
All you'll see is 250,000,000 shoulder shrugs. People will only get excited when the food stamps bounce.
Rogerc
13th April 2012, 14:13
Problem is - even if you change governments you are still under the control of the Illuminati.
The Rothschilds own 51% of the Fed
Rogerc
13th April 2012, 14:16
Hi Maia, Perhaps because we've just been too dumb surviving and don't have time to think.
here's to the peoples revolution
modwiz
13th April 2012, 14:20
All you'll see is 250,000,000 shoulder shrugs. People will only get excited when the food stamps bounce.
Shutting down all TV service would get a reaction for sure.
Rogerc
13th April 2012, 14:20
Karma will have its handsome revenge at godspeed with all the ass clowns who run this corrupt organization we call a government. I will meditate upon this becoming fruition. I've had enough of this 3 Ring Circus Act to say the least. Nuff Said. There time is short. So be It.
Karma is cool and it will catch up - but things are progressing too fast.
The people must start acting
GlassSteagallfan
14th April 2012, 03:37
The Final Stage of Obama’s Dictatorship
by David Christie -- on behalf of the national slate of [6+] LPAC-endorsed candidates for US Congress
Be not deceived- Obama’s full frontal attack on the Supreme Court is nothing less than the final phase of his “Hitler dictatorship”. Obama has now effectively adopted the “fuhrerprinzip” of the Nazi legal theorist, Carl Schmitt.
After Adolph Hitler murdered his political opponents during the “night of the long knives”, Schmitt authored a short, but concise justification of the Hitler dictatorship, in August of 1934, which stated that in a “…moment of danger he directly creates law by virtue of his leadership as the supreme judicial authority.... The true Leader is always also Judge. From the Leadership flows the judgeship.” The nature of Obama’s attack on the Supreme Court is to establish him as judge, jury, and executioner. It is the final stage in a process of his attack on due process, in both the detention policy contained in the NDAA, and the targeted assassinations of American citizens without trial.
In a webcast delivered on April 11th, 2009, Lyndon LaRouche identified Obama as a carbon copy of the Emperor Nero. In that webcast, LaRouche elaborated that Obama is a Narcissist, not only as Nero was, but as Adolph Hitler was as well. In the past three years since that webcast, we have now seen LaRouche’s warning play out in Obama’s intense commitment to destroy our nation and the Constitution it is based upon, in his drive to implement a fascist dictatorship. We have seen his utter contempt for the separation of the powers contained in the Constitution by his attack on Libya, refusing to go to Congress for the authorization of war. He has even violated international law by ordering the assassination of the captured Muammar Gaddafi.
But his latest violation of the separation of powers in the Constitution, concerning his attack on the Supreme Court, is the last step in this Hitler coup. He must be removed immediately through impeachment, or by the 25th Amendment. This violation of the judicial review process of the Supreme Court, and his attack on the “unelected judges”, has now finally caught the attention of those within the institutions who had said that LaRouche was “over the top” on both the Nero comparison, and Obama’s Hitler mustache. Impeachment is now being murmured through the halls of our institutions, with a House Concurrent Resolution (H. Con. Res 107) that has been submitted by Walter Jones in the US congress, putting impeachment squarely on the table.
With a serious impeachment drive led by the National LaRouche Slate, the danger is that Obama will start a war abroad, to distract from his problems at home. However, any of the wars that start now, will not be limited to abroad. Any one of the global hotspots in Iran, Syria or North Korea, can set off a chain reaction process, culminating in thermonuclear war. Since the death of Gaddafi last October, LaRouche warned that the collapsing British Empire would use their puppet Obama to threaten Russia and China with thermonuclear annihilation, forcing them to forsake their commitment to true economic progress. The only way to stop this danger of a global thermonuclear holocaust is to immediately remove Obama.
Once he goes, we can implement the platform of the National LaRouche Slate, and return to our Constitution. This platform must be seen as a single integrated conception, beginning with the restoration of Glass-Steagall to wipe out the British Imperial banking syndicate, and then a return to Alexander Hamilton’s policy for national banking. This return to our national banking system will restore our sovereignty, by ensuring that we can finance our own development, instead of relying on the dole of the international banking cartel. What gives credit, or credibility, to the US Dollar, is our commitment to develop the future, with projects like NAWAPA, that create a potential for growth that outpaces attrition by increasing the energy flux density of the system as a whole. Real economics is scientific and cultural advancement, and requires a sovereign banking system to promote that and give us control over our destiny.
What constitutes the existence of the United States is each citizen’s participation in the core principles of our nation contained in the preamble- the general welfare, posterity and sovereignty. The intention of the system of checks and balances in the constitution is to ensure that our nation operates on these principles, not the momentary whims of a king or dictator. We have let Obama stay for too long. He must be removed now.
Source: http://larouchepac.com/node/22335
Maia Gabrial
14th April 2012, 14:23
Hey Avalonians,
I got this in my email just now. I have to tell you that I've wanted to do something like this a long time ago myself. The president has no reason to be proud of his accomplishments. (Really? How hard is it to destroy a country?) This teacher has had enough and has voiced her outrage. Maybe more of us should do the same, even with the outrageous and illegal NDAA hanging over our heads.... Personally, I don't think speaking your mind to any traitorous president warrants getting fired or any kind of punishment. In fact, she should be commended and promoted!
So, here's the excerpt:
Subject: Fwd: 4TH GRADE TEACHER LETS OBAMA HAVE IT
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:13:39 -0400 (EDT)
>A TEACHER FROM THE GREAT STATE OF MISSOURI WILL LOSE HER JOB FOR STANDING UP FOR
>>>>>ALL OF US.
>>>>>
>>>>>Give this teacher, a true American, a standing ovation.
>>>>>This 4th grade teacher has said it all, and she was brave enough to attach her
>>>>>name to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>The White House
>>>>> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
>>>>> Washington , DC 20500
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Obama:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.
>>>>>
>>>>>You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America . You are responsible to the citizens of the United States . You are
>>>>>not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.
>>>>>
>>>>>I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe ?
>>>>>Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?
>>>>>
>>>>> Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States ? This country was
>>>>>founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?
>>>>>
>>>>>Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia . You didn't show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect
>>>>>they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia .. How dare you, sir!
>>>>>How dare you!
>>>>>
>>>>>You can't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey . You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you? I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamedof yourselves, all of you.
>>>>>
>>>>>You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them?
>>>>>Anything? I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>
>>>>>What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't!
>>>>>Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51
>>>>>million not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now?
>>>>>
>>>>>I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you.
>>>>>
>>>>>I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms
>>>>>destroying my beautiful country.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>>Every real American
>>>>>
>>>>>P.S. I rarely ask that emails be 'passed around'.................PLEASE SEND
>>>>>THIS TO YOUR EMAIL LIST......it's past time for all Americans to wake up!
>>>>>
>>>>>Ms Kathleen Lyday
>>>>>Fourth Grade Teacher
>>>>>Grandview Elementary School
>>>>>11470 Hwy . C
>>>>>Hillsboro , MO 63050
>>>>>(636) 944-3291 Phone
>>>>>(636) 944-3870 Fax
>>>>>
>>>>>This woman may lose her job for this letter. I believe we owe it to her for
>>>>>expressing the outrage that we feel but fail to address. Please pass this on.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2409/4916 - Release Date: 04/05/12
gypsybutterflykiss
14th April 2012, 16:15
Balls to the wall!! I commend this woman! Thanks for the thread, Maia! Perhaps, more people are slowly beginning to wipe the sleep out of their eyes than realized? :)
Cidersomerset
14th April 2012, 20:53
The Guardian home
The Observer home
Afghan war whistleblower Daniel Davis: 'I had to speak out – lives are at stake'
Soldier wrote detailed report claiming US generals 'have so distorted the truth … the truth has become unrecognisable'
Paul Harris in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 14 April 2012 11.20 BST
Article history
Lieutenant-Colonel Daniel Davis
Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis claims US generals are lying to the public about the military campaign in Afghanistan. Photograph: Observer
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2012/4/13/1334352112770/Lieutenant-Colonel-Daniel-008.jpg
"I am – how do you say it? – persona non grata," said Lieutenant-Colonel Daniel Davis, as he sat sipping a coffee and eating a chocolate sundae in a shopping mall, just a subway stop from the Pentagon.
The career soldier is now a black sheep at the giant defence department building where he still works. The reason was his extraordinarily brave decision to accuse America's military top brass of lying about the war in Afghanistan. When he went public in the New York Times, he was acclaimed as a hero for speaking out about a war that many Americans feel has gone horribly awry. Later this month he will receive a Ridenhour prize, an award given to whistleblowers that is named after the Vietnam war soldier who exposed the My Lai massacre.
Davis believes people are not being told the truth and said so in a detailed report that he wrote after returning from his second tour of duty in the country. He had been rocketed, mortared and had stepped on an improvised explosive device that failed to explode. Soldiers he had met were killed and he was certain that a bloody disaster was unfolding. So he spoke out. "It's like I see in slow motion men dying for nothing and I can't stop it," he said. "It is consuming me from the inside. It is eating me alive."
Davis, 48, drew up two reports containing research and observations garnered from his last tour. He was not short of material. As part of his job he had criss-crossed the country, travelling 9,000 miles and talking to more than 250 people. He had built up a picture of a hopeless cause; a country where Afghan soldiers were incapable of holding on to American gains. US soldiers would fight and die for territory and then see Afghan troops let it fall to the Taliban. Often the Afghans actively worked with the Taliban or simply refused to fight. One Afghan police officer laughed in Davis's face when asked if he ever tried to fight the enemy. "That would be dangerous!" the man said.
Yet at the same time Davis saw America's military chiefs, such as General David Petraeus, constantly speak about America's successes, especially when working with local troops. So Davis compiled two reports: one classified and one unclassified. He sent both to politicians in Washington and lobbied them on his concerns. Then in February he went public by giving an interview to the New York Times and writing a damning editorial in a military newspaper. Then – and only then – did he tell his own army bosses what he had done.
Davis pulled no punches. His report's opening statement read: "Senior ranking US military leaders have so distorted the truth when communicating with the US Congress and American people in regards to conditions on the ground in Afghanistan that the truth has become unrecognisable."
The report detailed an alarming picture of Taliban advances and spiralling violence. Afghan security forces were unwilling or unable to fight, or actively aiding the enemy. That picture was contrasted with repeated rosy statements from US military leaders. His classified version was far more damning, but it remains a secret. "I am no WikiLeaks guy part two," Davis said. He foresees a simple and logical end point for Afghanistan – civil war and societal collapse, probably long before the last US combat soldier is scheduled to leave. He says the Afghan army and police simply cannot cope and the US forces training and working with them know that, despite official pronouncements to the contrary. "What I saw first hand in virtually every circumstance was a barely functioning organisation often co-operating with the insurgent enemy," Davis's report said.
The document was also damning about the role of the US media in reporting the war. Ever since Vietnam, generals have slammed the press as a potential danger to military operations, but Davis's report lambasted journalists for failing to question the official army line. He said the media were obsessed with getting "access" to military bases and generals and tempered reporting in order to maintain that situation. "Most of the media just takes the talking points and repeats them," he said.
Davis has not been officially sanctioned – because his classified report remains secret, he broke no law – and the military has not set out actively to condemn him. Instead there has been a muted official response, while privately, Davis said, many colleagues have congratulated him for speaking out. Yet he is now experiencing a strange end to a military career to which he devoted his life. It included serving in Germany, both Iraq wars and then two tours in Afghanistan. He said it gave him pride and a sense of purpose in doing a greater good.
"I loved the army. There was nothing I have ever wanted to do more than this job since I started as a private back in 1985," he said. That is a very all-American sentiment, but then so is Davis's background. He was born the son of a football coach and grew up in Dallas, Texas. He is a born-again Christian who sings in a church choir. He said the decision to go public involved heavy "soul-searching".
It has also made any future career advancement highly unlikely. "Maybe no one will listen, but I would not be able to sleep if I made no attempt," he said.
What Davis wants – and what several politicians are lobbying for – are congressional hearings on the issue. He wants the generals grilled on his report and on how their comments compare with the evidence. But that needs the support of party leaders such as Democratic senator Harry Reid or Republican House speaker John Boehner, and that seems unlikely because such hearings would be a political minefield.
This only serves to infuriate Davis. "Wouldn't you want to know the truth when you are making a war-and-peace decision?" Does he have any regrets? "There has never been a fraction of a question as to whether I did the right thing," he said. "Lives are at stake."
Phoenix
14th April 2012, 21:33
Karma will have its handsome revenge at godspeed with all the ass clowns who run this corrupt organization we call a government. I will meditate upon this becoming fruition. I've had enough of this 3 Ring Circus Act to say the least. Nuff Said. There time is short. So be It.
WF, I love the positivity, but... I don't understand why you think their time is short... There's nothing I've seen that shows there is any hope. I get the spiritual argument, that we are all one and so on, but I just can't get myself to meditate in the closet while people all over the world are slaughtered.
Cidersomerset
14th April 2012, 22:30
This should be very interresting for whisleblowers, and whether the mainstream attack him
or ignore him ....
-f7E0_bgwDU
Cidersomerset
14th April 2012, 22:41
http://www.news24.com/World/News/Julian-Assange-show-debuts-next-week-20120414
News24.com
Julian Assange show debuts next week
2012-04-14 12:39
April 13 - Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will launch his new TV talk show on Russia Today on April 17, but is keeping the guest list secret, the Kremlin-funded English language station said on Friday.
Assange, who is under house arrest in England fighting extradition to Sweden for questioning on an alleged sexual assault, filmed "The World Tomorrow" show from Britain.
Russia Today (RT) said in a news release that it would not release the guest list in advance, but said the first interview would prove controversial.
"We do not want to kill the buzz and the intrigue by revealing the name of the first guest," said RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan.
"But I have no doubt that this particular guest and this interview will lead to calls to shut us down from some especially hawkish personalities who have little respect for freedom of speech," she added.
Australian-born Assange said in a statement he would be talking to people "who normally simply would not be given a voice on TV at all. What is fair to say is that the majority of what they have said to me they could not say on a mainstream TV network."
Russia Today is considered a key Kremlin exercise in image enhancement by critics. It is beamed to some 430 million subscribers worldwide and it also streams online.
Assange's new show will be broadcast simultaneously from Moscow and Washington DC, in English, Arabic and Spanish.
Assange said April 17 marks the 500th day since financial transaction firms like Visa, Mastercard and Paypal began to refuse working with Wikileaks after it published a raft of secret US diplomatic cables in late 2010.
The blockade has crippled the organisation's ability to fund itself and continue its work.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CNN has put up a article , but no other mainstream yet .....
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/14/world/europe/russia-wikileaks/index.html
Rogerc
14th April 2012, 23:25
Thanks Cidersomerset
S(hades) of Vietnam when General Westmorland announced that he gauged success by "body count"
Cidersomerset
15th April 2012, 00:10
I agree TPTB learnt their lesson from Vietnam and have kept the press mainly at bay.....
but this vid got out which you may have seen about British troops fighting with stoned Afghani troops...
Kc8w0IX4UQc
http://www.military.com/video/operations-and-strategy/afghanistan-conflict/fighting-alongside-stoned-ana-troops/1268927609001/
The Americans are having the same problem...
O2F80llZ5F4
The reasons for going in imho were to reopen the popyfields almost closed down by the
Taliban, establish the trans Caspian sea oil/Gas pipeline which negotiations for had stalled
prior to the invasion, and to tighten the noose around Iran ,,,,,,
Cidersomerset
15th April 2012, 00:25
Craig Murray ...Whistleblower......
Former UK embassador to Uzbekistan...
tGMzfWvpB0E
Unified Serenity
15th April 2012, 04:18
This is just one more action done by our President thumbing his nose at American's who have been wanting to drill oil in Alaska. What do you think Russia is going to do with this land? Who gave Obama the authority to do any of this? Obama is a traitor and communist lover. He is betraying America, and just a week ago it was reported that he told Putin to back off until after the election when he would be much more free to make deals.
OH NO WE CANNOT DRILL BABY DRILL IN AMERICA, BUT RUSSIA WILL SELL BABY SELL THE OIL RIGHT BACK TO US!
From:
(WorldNewsTribune) Obama’s State Department is giving away seven strategic, resource-laden Alaskan islands to the Russians. Yes, to the Putin regime in the Kremlin. … The seven endangered islands in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea include one the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined. The Russians are also to get the tens of thousands of square miles of oil-rich seabeds surrounding the islands. The Department of Interior estimates billions of barrels of oil are at stake.
The State Department has undertaken the giveaway in the guise of a maritime boundary agreement between Alaska and Siberia. Astoundingly, our federal government itself drew the line to put these seven Alaskan islands on the Russian side. But as an executive agreement, it could be reversed with the stroke of a pen by President Obama or Secretary Clinton.
The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition – but the State Department doesn’t seem to care.
Read more at: http://times247.com/articles/obama-must-stop-alaskan-islands-giveaway
crosby
15th April 2012, 04:28
i don't know about anyone else, but my head is just pounding from all this garbage. will it ever end?
"The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition – but the State Department doesn’t seem to care."
apparently not negotiated secretly enough...... something has to give here pretty soon. what will it take?
regards, corson
Cjay
15th April 2012, 11:08
The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition – but the State Department doesn’t seem to care.
Since when do dictators care?
Alie
15th April 2012, 11:20
We have a few threads about Putin (some people think he's on the good side - I don't discount this POV) ... so I think there's more to this story than we think.
Hermite
15th April 2012, 11:58
A little research, perhaps?
Bennett Island is part of the Sakha Republic administrative division of Russia.
In 1916 the Russian ambassador in London issued an official notice to the effect that the Imperial government considered Bennett, along with other Arctic islands, integral parts of the Russian Empire. This territorial claim was later maintained by the Soviet Union.
Some U.S. individuals assert American ownership of Bennett Island based on the 1881 landing. A resolution of the Alaska State Senate in 1988 supported this claim. However, the United States government has never claimed Bennett Island, and recognizes it as Russian territory. In 1994, the Alaska State Supreme Court ruled in D. Denardo v. State of Alaska that Bennett Island, along with several islands, is not part of Alaska.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bennett_Island
mountain_jim
15th April 2012, 12:55
A quick look at the World News Tribune website, at least the few times it's servers successfully served the web pages, makes it appear to be a Republican-cheerleader rag, praising Romney, who is no better and likely worse, etc.
I am as upset with Obama's bait and switch results as likely anyone who believed in and voted for him, but this does not appear to be a worthwhile source of news reports or editorials, in my opinion.
Thanks to Hermite for an alternative view.
Again in my opinion there is no healthy future in support of continued oil drilling in Alaska or any other pristine areas - that's speaking from the pocket of the Rockefeller-clan and other elite oil baron families that have worked to suppress the alternatives for so long.
Unified Serenity
15th April 2012, 13:01
Facts are facts and we are an oil based economy. American is being driven into the ground so to speak because we won't drill and therefore must pay the ridiculous costs the other nations want and watch as they fill their pockets with out money. Have all the "oil is bad" ideas you want and talk ill all you want about the nasty elites but that does not change the truth of the matter, and the truth is we could have 1.00 per gallon gas if we just drilled it ourselves. I don't care what bent a publication has if the information is the truth.
We did NOT have to agree to anything with the Russians, but our traitor in chief made a deal. Spin that.
mountain_jim
15th April 2012, 14:04
A Romney-Ryan ticket is the Democrats’ worst nightmare, and it is our best shot at restoring the American dream.
That is a quote from that rag. What a joke.
Duality-inflaming false choices between Repugs and Dems has proven to be meaningless for any real positive change. Currently both parties have the same ultimate owners.
Frank Zappa (a cynic I know) had it about right:
Government is the Entertainment division of the military-industrial complex
"Drilling it ourselves" nearly ruined the Gulf. And no it has not returned to it's former state.
More on this 'story' below (and no I don't consider factcheck.org always unbiased or accurate, but I think that image speaks for itself about the truth of this matter. I also don't hate on everything WorldNetDaily stirs up, because I agree with them that Obama's past is pretty shady/obscured and he probably was not eligible to be prez - not that that has mattered much in this elite-controlled society.):
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/03/alaskan-island-giveaway/
Q: Is President Obama giving away several Alaskan islands to Russia?
A: No. The U.S. has never claimed ownership of the islands identified in viral emails and websites. They lie far closer to the coast of Siberia than to Alaska.
FULL QUESTION
I am certain the following e-rumor is not true but could you please research the story surrounding it and print it on your site? Thanks.
Subject: Losing a part of oil rich Alaska
Get this – as usual it is being done quietly and most Americans are TOTALLY unaware of it.
Obama Giveaway – Oil Rich Islands of Alaska to Russia. As a part of Obama’s war against U.S. energy independence includes a foreign aid program that directly threatens Alaska’s sovereign territory and your land and mine. Obama’s State Department is GIVING away seven (7) strategic resource laden Alaskan island to the Russians – yes tot the Putin regime in the Kremlin. Can you believe the nerve of this guy?
The seven endangered islands to be given away in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea include one the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined.
The Russians also get the tens of thousand of square miles of rich oil seabeds surrounding the islands. The Department of the Interior is on record of estimating billions of barrels of oil are at stake.
This agreement was negotiated in TOTAL SECRECY. The State of Alaska was NOT allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given ANY opportunity for comment. Well certainly when Alaska found out about this they passed a resolution of opposition – but the State department does not care what their position is on this matter nor yours either for that matter. Yet it could be stopped with a draft of a pen from either Obama or Secretary Hilary Clinton. These islands have been a part of Alaska since 1881 and are the islands of Wrangell, Bennett, Jeannette, Henrietta, DeLong Islands, Copper Island, Sea Lion Rock and Sea Otter Rock. The later islands a part of Alaska since 1867.
Now get this Russia did not ask for this territory as a part of the State Department’s new maritime agreement nor are we getting anything in return – we are just giving them away and giving a foreign country a closer step to our mainland.
Apparently as usual our elected officials are not even aware of this happening. Let’s remind EVER member of Congress of this dealing underneath the table and to reject giving away a part of our 49th State. Your voice needs to be heard !!!!!
FULL ANSWER
A look at the map will give the reader some notion of the frozen “Alaskan” islands under discussion. All are far closer to the Russian mainland than to the Alaskan mainland. All lie on the Russian side of the U.S.-Russia maritime boundary set by a treaty that the U.S. Senate ratified overwhelmingly more than two decades ago, after being signed by President George H.W. Bush, and with the support of both of Alaska’s senators.
http://factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2012/03/State_Department_Map.png
The largest, Wrangel Island (in Russian, Ostrov Vrangelya), is named for the Russian explorer Ferdinand P. Wrangel, who heard of the island from Siberian natives as early as 1820. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Wrangel did not land on it while mapping the Siberian coast that year. The first European to sight it may have been the British explorer Capt. Henry Kellett, who in 1849 discovered and landed on nearby Herald Island, and saw Wrangel in the distance.
The uninhabited Wrangel Island was sighted by U.S. vessels in 1867 and 1881, but not settled. A Canadian explorer named Vilhjalmur Stefansson and survivors of a disastrous expedition reached the island in 1914. But when Stefansson later tried to claim Wrangel for Canada without authorization, he caused an international incident, infuriating the Canadian government. Then in 1926 the Soviet Union staked a claim to the island and settled a few native families there.
According to a 1990 story by the Associated Press, Wrangel and four other uninhabited islands were surveyed in 1881 by a U.S. Navy commander, and for a time were listed in the “District of Alaska” by the U.S. Geological Survey. That’s about the extent of justification for calling them “Alaskan.” Neither the U.S., Britain nor Canada has disputed the Soviet (and now Russian) claim to Wrangel. The U.S. State Department says Wrangel and the others weren’t included in the U.S. purchase of Alaska from Russia in 1867, and “they have never been claimed by the United States.”
Nevertheless, a crusading California activist named Carl Olson, of Woodland Hills, Calif., made it his business to claim that the islands are “100 percent American,” as the AP said in 1990. The organization Olson founded, “State Department Watch, Ltd,” is still pressing that argument today. (The group is a nonprofit advocacy organization that reported taking in $2.4 million in 2010 but spent most of it on fundraising, according to its most recent IRS Form 990. It paid Olson an $80,000 salary, made grants of $51,000 to the “1776 Tea Party” of Laguna Woods, Calif., and $9,500 to the “Minuteman Project, Inc.” of Aliso Viejo, Calif. But nearly $2 million was reported going for postage and printing. The group reports that it hired Virginia-based WJM Associates, a fundraising and marketing firm that lists several Republican and conservative groups as clients.)
Despite Olson’s objections, the Senate ratified a treaty establishing the current maritime boundary between the U.S. and the Soviet Union (now Russia) on Sept. 16, 1991. The vote was a lopsided 86 to 6. Alaska’s senators, the late Ted Stevens and Frank Murkowski, both Republicans, voted in favor of ratification.
But voting against the treaty were Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Chuck Grassley of Iowa and four other Republicans, led by the late Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina. During a very brief debate, Helms said he was fighting to “protect the status” of Wrangel Island and four others: Herald, Bennett, Henrietta and Jeannette Islands.
The treaty did not specifically cede sovereignty over the islands to the Soviets (which the U.S. wasn’t disputing anyway), and merely clarified the location of the maritime boundary to settle squabbles over fishing and undersea mineral rights. Nevertheless, Helms said he would vote against it because “I doubt that the State Department will make use of the opportunity to press U.S. claims to the five islands — even though the right to do so is preserved.”
(To read the full debate in the Congressional Record, search the Library of Congress Thomas website for the 102nd Congress, and enter “S13036″ to bring up the first page.)
And sure enough, no president or secretary of state since has shown any interest in disputing the Soviet/Russian claim to Wrangel Island or the others. Which brings us to the present accusation that President Obama is somehow giving away something the U.S. has never claimed to own. How can that be?
For one thing, the maritime boundary treaty has never been ratified by the Russians, which is required for it to take full force. By the time the U.S. Senate had ratified the treaty (signed by the Soviets the previous year), the Soviet Union was near collapse. Shortly afterward, the Russian Federation notified the U.S. government by diplomatic note that it would continue to abide by the terms of the agreement on a provisional basis, however.
Ironically, in view of claims of a U.S. “giveaway,” it is the Russians who have sought to renegotiate the terms of the boundary treaty on grounds that their side gave up too much to the United States. A history of the matter, by Vlad M. Kaczynski of the Warsaw School of Economics, published in the May 1, 2007, edition of the Russian Analytical Digest, details why the new Russian Federation refused to ratify the treaty:
Kaczynski, 2007: Many accuse Gorbachev and Shevardnadze of ceding Russia’s rightful fishing areas in their haste to negotiate a deal for signature at the 1990 White House Summit. “Russian parliamentarians understood perfectly well that the agreement infringed upon Russia’s interests and therefore the document has never been ratified by the Russian parliament,” these critics say. Other Russian officials have voiced their opposition to the treaty not only because of lost fishing opportunities, but also due to the loss of potential oil and gas fields and naval passages for submarines.
Content to hang on to what the Soviet negotiators gave up, the U.S. State Department says, “The United States has no intention of reopening discussion of the 1990 Maritime Boundary Agreement.” However, since the treaty has yet to be ratified by the Russians, Olson and some on the right argue that the U.S. should still be pressing claims to Wrangel (Olson prefers to spell it “Wrangell” with two “l’s”) and other islands and rocks.
The whole business was raised anew in an opinion piece published Feb. 16 on the conservative site World Net Daily (notable for promoting dubious claims about the president’s birthplace). It was written by Joe Miller, the Tea Party favorite who defeated Sen. Lisa Murkowski (daughter of former Sen. Frank Murkowski) in the 2010 Republican Senate primary, only to see Lisa Murkowski go on to win the general election handily as a write-in candidate.
“Obama’s State Department is giving away seven strategic, resource-laden Alaskan islands to the Russians,” Miller wrote. “We won the Cold War and should start acting like it.” The following day, Miller posted an addendum to his piece conceding that he was raising “an old issue” and that he had been “assisted with this article” by Olson’s State Department Watch.
It is an old issue indeed. In fact, World Net Daily itself published a July 29, 2008, article critical of the State Department for the “island giveaway.” Of course, George W. Bush — not Obama — was president at the time. (The Bush administration’s official Arctic Region Policy stated that the U.S. would abide by the 1990 maritime agreement and would continue to urge the Russian Federation to ratify it.)
And we’re not sure why Miller mentions only seven islands when Olson always has insisted the U.S. has a claim to eight. But whatever the count, it is simply false to claim that Obama is “giving away” islands to which no U.S. president has asserted a claim for more than 85 years, if ever.
– Brooks Jackson
Sources
United Nations. “Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on maritime boundary, Signed June 1, 1990.” Delimitation Treaties Infobase.
“Wrangel Island.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2012. 27 Mar. 2012.
Neatby, Leslie H. “Kellett, Sir Henry.” Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online. Web. 27 Mar. 2012. .
Diubaldo, Richard J. “Vilhjalmur Stefansson.” The Canadian Encyclopedia. 27 Mar. 2012.
Robinson, Mike. “Arctic’s Wrangel Island Becomes ‘Hot’ Issue.” The Associated Press. 29 Sep 1990.
U.S. Department of States. “Status of Wrangel and Other Arctic Islands.” 8 Sep 2009.
State Department Watch. Accessed 23 Mar 2012.
Internal Revenue Service. “Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax – State Department Watch.” 2010.
Clients. William J. McCarthy & Associates. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
U.S. Senate. Treaty Doc. 101-22, roll call vote #192. 16 Sep 1991.
U.S. Congressional Record. 16 Sep 1991: S13036 – S13040.
“8 December.” Russiapedia. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
Kaczynski, Vlad M. “US-Russia Bering Sea Marine Border Dispute: Conflict over Strategic Assets, Fisheries and Energy Sources.” Russian Analytical Digest. 1 May 2007.
“Oil? Ah, Let Russia Have It.” World Net Daily. 29 Jul 2008, accessed 27 Mar 2012.
Miller, Joe. “Obama’s Giveaway: Oil-Rich Island to Russia.” World Net Daily. 16 Feb 2012, accessed 27 Mar 2012.
“National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive.” Press Release. White House. 12 Jan 2009.
“Summary of Giveaway of 8 American Alaskan Islands to the Russian Government.” State Department Watch. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
Operator
15th April 2012, 14:16
Well, a lot of people may not like what I am going to say here ...
but it appears to me that the USA in no longer boss in this world.
They may have dominated this world technologically and have policed it consequently but somehow I observe
that other countries start to ignore the USA and/or even start them to tell what to do.
Since top-secret drones start to land in Iran (gracefully taken down, not shot down) I think the technological
balance shifted. As a consequence of this technological shift oil based economies have become obsolete.
So beware for countries that heavily depend on this (The one and only refinery here is closed as we speak).
DreamsInDigital
15th April 2012, 15:23
Russia has been technologically and weaponally superior all along and still are.
steveofengland
16th April 2012, 06:44
Just heard this on MSM BBC radio 2. Not read the full article in the telegraph but h
It seems he has been suspende by the labour party for putting a multi million £ reward for the capture of obama and bush.
Lord Ahmed, a controversial British, peer has been suspended from the Labour Party amid reports that he offered a £10 million bounty for the capture of President Barack Obama and his predecessor President George W Bush.
Lord Nazir Ahmed, 53, who in 1998 became the first Muslim life peer, was reported to have made the comments at a conference in Haripur in Pakistan.
A Labour Party spokesman said: "We have suspended Lord Ahmed pending investigation. If these comments are accurate we utterly condemn these remarks which are totally unacceptable."
According to Pakistan's Express Tribune newspaper Lord Ahmed offered the bounty in response to a US action a week ago.
The US issued a $10 million reward for the capture of Pakistani militant leader Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, founder of the Lashkar-e-Taiba group, who it suspects of orchestrating the 2008 Mumbai attacks in which 166 people died as terrorists stormed hotels and a train station.
The British peer reportedly said: "'If the US can announce a reward of $10 million for the (capture) of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of £10 million (for the capture of) President Obama and his predecessor, George Bush."
Lord Ahmed reportedly said he would arrange the bounty at any cost, even if he had to sell his own personal assets including his house.
He was said to have made the comments at a reception arranged in his honour by the business community of Haripur on Friday.
A former Pakistani foreign minister and a provincial education minister were said to have been present at the reception.
Lord Ahmed, who was born in Pakistan, became Baron Ahmed of Rotherham at the age of 40. In 2007 he was highly critical of the awarding of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie, claiming the author had "blood on his hands."
In 2009 he was jailed for dangerous driving after sending and receiving text messages minutes before being involved in a fatal motorway crash. The Court of Appeal later suspended his 12-week jail sentence.
A week ago the US offered the bounty on Saeed in response to what it called his increasingly "brazen" conduct in Pakistan where he moves freely and appears on television.
Documents found by US special forces at Osama bin Laden's final hideaway in Abbottabad, 22 miles north of Haripur, last year apparently linked Saeed with the al-Qaeda leader. The evidence was said to have shown that bin Laden played a key role in planning the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
In its statement suspending Lord Ahmed the Labour Party said: "The international community is rightly doing all in its power to seek justice for the victims of the Mumbai bombings and halt terrorism."
But Lord Ahmed complained that party chiefs had not spoken to him before announcing the move and challenged the party to produce evidence against him.
He had told the meeting that Mr Bush and ex-Labour prime minister Tony Blair should be prosecuted for war crimes however, he added, speaking from Pakistan.
"They have suspended me? That's a surprise to me. I did not know," he said.
"If the Labour Party want to suspend me I will deal with the Labour Party. They will have to give me some evidence."
Asked about the reported comments, he said: "I never said those words.
"I did not offer a bounty. I said that there have been war crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan and those people who have got strong allegations against them - George W Bush and Tony Blair have been involved in illegal wars and should be brought to justice.
"I do not think there's anything wrong with that," he said - adding that he was equally concerned that anyone suspected of terrorism should face justice as well.
Source http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/9206078/Lord-Ahmed-suspended-from-Labour-Party-after-offering-10m-bounty-for-capture-of-Obama-and-Bush.html
GlassSteagallfan
16th April 2012, 13:43
A British peer has allegedly announced a £10-million bounty for Barack Obama and George W. Bush, prompting his suspension from the UK’s Labour party. Lord Ahmed denies this, saying his comments about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were misunderstood.
It all began with the announcement from Washington of a $10-million bounty for information that would lead to the capture and conviction of Hafiz Saeed, suspected of taking part in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.
“If the US can announce a reward of $10 million for the captor of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of £10 million on President Obama and his predecessor George Bush,” Ahmed was quoted by Pakistani newspaper the Express Tribune as saying. The paper also said Lord Ahmed was prepared to arrange the bounty at any cost, even if that meant selling all his personal assets, including his house.
Lord Ahmed allegedly made the comments at a reception in his honor in Haripur, Pakistan.
More: http://rt.com/news/suspension-obama-bounty-ahmed-143/
muxfolder
16th April 2012, 14:06
We Will Not Be Silenced:
EGZFgMNM-UU
BXNqFQmGxDU
o4XFvq5XMk8
cnclKiHwatw
GlassSteagallfan
16th April 2012, 14:14
a little old, but the truth remains...
President Clinton's Terrible Mistake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haAWSJCUvkM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haAWSJCUvkM
Billy
16th April 2012, 14:30
I heard this on BBC radio news today.
Where did all the bounty hunters go when you need them :p
9eagle9
16th April 2012, 15:56
Would you refresh my memory as to what a 'birther' is?
ThePythonicCow
16th April 2012, 17:00
A British peer has allegedly announced a £10-million bounty for Barack Obama and George W. Bush, ...
I merged this into this earlier thread on the same topic.
ThePythonicCow
16th April 2012, 18:09
Would you refresh my memory as to what a 'birther' is?
Like the word "truther", which disparages those who seek the "truth" behind 9/11, a "birther" is a disparaging word for those who seek the "truth" behind Obama's birth certificate and his origins. It's another one of those "conspiracy nutter" put downs.
sigma6
22nd April 2012, 00:07
The Name 'Obama' in Swahili apparently means "Surname" according to Christian Dan...
What's In A Name... anyone able to confirm that? I would be interested...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3_L5aKTKt8
This guy is a self taught 'guru' in the 'B.C. (Birth Certificate) is a trust instrument' movement... although some of the stuff he says is radical, and it sounds like he is playing on words to an extreme degree, and yet a lot of what he says, does have a basis, and more importantly, I am impressed with the amount of research he has put into the study of this subject which is also apparently seeing results in the courts... there are so many 'gurus' out there and none of them seem to have the inclination or desire to have a big 'guru' conference (sad) to sort things out and create a standardization of knowledge, but alas all new 'fields of study' must start out this way... I do find Dan's ideas consistent with a lot of fundamental ideas that I believe... and it is still going to be a few years before I think this is completely sorted, it's just as difficult as studying to be a lawyer imo, your just on the other side of the coin... ie. trying to learn and understand it from the 'outside'... I follow some of his material as he is an original thinker, and not a 'mixer' or 'borrower of other's ideas' (like myself)
Unified Serenity
22nd April 2012, 02:15
Wow, thanks Sigma! Great find with this guy. I love these two videos:
ntzTuZHH3IE
eqJtq_JvwWI
I love these symbolism topics, meanings of words, numbers, images etc.. This will keep me busy for a while.
Thanks
sigma6
22nd April 2012, 14:13
My plez Serenity....
yeah, that one is a good primer on Dan's views... interesting presentation...
these studies on the the B.C. have been going on for over 20 years,
the 'great grand daddy' being Roger Elvick, then I would say the 'grand daddy'
next would be Winston Shrout from 2002/3 till present ...
I have now collected work from over 50 names in about 600 videos over the last 4 years
(a Babylon of sorts...)
But it looks like everyone is starting to zero in on the idea of understanding this in terms
of Trust Laws... in one way or another... imo this is the nature of the B.C.
Unfortunatley... the trust issue opens up a whole new field to study...
this is not a topic one can learn in a couple of months...
very few truly understand the full depth and complexity of trust laws
(thanks to the Romans and how they perverted it to their own purposes... sound familiar...)
yet it may be the underpinning bedrock of ALL 'legal' systems...
(going back to the Bible... as in 1st Testament and 2nd Testament...)
according to Shrout it was in fact encoded in the Bible to establish and explain how commerce operates,
think of the KJV commissioned to Sir Francis Bacon (the same guy who is in fact the real Shakespeare...
and bastard son of the Queen... and I think the other guy involved was a member of the Priori of Sion... etc, etc...)
and low and behold... the good book IS formulated as a set of Trust Covenants
(Testaments need Testators...)
anyways welcome to the rabbit hole...
meanwhile back to the future... on another front...
There's a lot of links coming out now about Obama's B.C.
Well so far, my prediction has held up... as per my other post...
Obama, his Birth Certificate - Hidden History of United States
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?42741-Obama-his-Birth-Certificate-and-the-Hidden-History-of-the-United-States&p=452784#post452784
ie. that even if it was brought to court, he wouldn't be found guilty...
so far, so true...
this could be another educational moment for the American public...
like when Bill Clinton proved that everything is 'legal' as opposed to... 'what you think it is'
Obama 'officially' 'ineligible' ... LOL
http://youtu.be/b8ktsrcZC5Y
lot of articles coming out in the last day... enjoy...
here is article referenced...
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-officially-ineligible
Unified Serenity
22nd April 2012, 15:13
I am surprised we are not hearing about "common law" trusts again. I helped set one up for a wealthy friend back in the mid 1990's. They are amazing, but difficult to do legally.
bodhii71
28th April 2012, 15:08
eZfRQ0KZLa8
Skeptix
28th April 2012, 15:19
Apparently Colleen(the lady interviewed in the above post) recently made a 180 reverse on this subject. She now believes all extraterrestrials are fallen-angel DEMONS trying to deceive humanity.
ygkWpiMNQbU
jackovesk
28th April 2012, 15:21
I wondered where Colleen Thomas went...? :pound:
bodhii71
28th April 2012, 15:31
IDK, haven't followed any of Colleen's work. What I do find most astonishing, is to find this covered by RT.
Are the Pleadians part of GFL? Haven't watched your post Skeptix,(will when time permits), but isn't she slamming Ashtar command.
DreamsInDigital
28th April 2012, 15:42
Bodhii
Real Pleiadians have no connection to the GFL, The GFL is an entity from an Regressive Reptoid AI Ship.
And, yes ETs did shoot down the North Korean missile. But, it wasn't Pleiadians.
Skeptix
28th April 2012, 15:43
IDK, haven't followed any of Colleen's work. What I do find most astonishing, is to find this covered by RT.
Are the Pleadians part of GFL? Haven't watched your post Skeptix,(will when time permits), but isn't she slamming Ashtar command.
RT is a good news source, they cover a lot of topics that would be considered "fringe" but just like any media outlet, they are going to have their own agenda.
I am not really up to par with all the GFL information, but Colleen claims "the Pleiadians are LIARS, they are fallen-angels working for LUCIFER. The Andromedans are LIARS, They are fallen-angels working for LUCIFER. The ZETAs are DEVILS."
In my opinion the GFL are a really advanced AI system, but who knows. :)
GoodETxSG
28th April 2012, 16:45
Apparently Colleen(the lady interviewed in the above post) recently made a 180 reverse on this subject. She now believes all extraterrestrials are fallen-angel DEMONS trying to deceive humanity.
ygkWpiMNQbU
What is the difference really? Other than perception that is...
Bryn ap Gwilym
28th April 2012, 17:23
Wow, this screams out pee take.
Could this be an attack on the alternative thinkers?
At one point I thought she was going to burst out laughing as it seemd that she was just throwing anything in there.
Its no wonder she didn't mention the below as she rambled on about the Pleiadians, but then again that would have opened the Onion right out exposing the guts / truth for all to see.
Alice Bailey
Madame Blavatsky
Theosophical Society
Otto Hesse
George Van Tassel is the original channeller of Astar - Ashtar Galactic Command later known as The Galactic Federation of Light
Master Jesus
Ascended Masters
St. Germain
etc etc etc...
Vitalux
28th April 2012, 18:21
The more and more I have studied about alien messages given to people among us here on Earth is that they too seem to have an agenda of keeping us in the dark.
To those that have studied Reality, one thing I am sure we can agree on, is that the last thing we know is the truth about anything.
bodhii71
28th April 2012, 18:32
I truly wish to make sense of all this within my lifetime. The more I look outward, the more convoluted.
So, who did shoot down this missile? Why?
The GFL is an entity from an Regressive Reptoid AI Ship. - ?
Operator
28th April 2012, 18:33
Ahh, we are on the next level. Aliens made it to the lamestream media ...
So now we can use THAT meme to divide and conquer. Not only do aliens exist, there are now
several groups and we can start fighting over who is who, who's to trust etc.
Fundy Gemini
28th April 2012, 18:39
I make no secret of my belief that Mr. MT Keshe is the real deal, some agree some do not. My point here is that I don't want this thread to devolve into believers vs non-believers, I'm simply looking for some information on a statement he published yesterday.
April 21 was the first international presentation and technology disclosure from The Keshe Foundation. Naturally this is highly sensitive information, but I was looking for some feedback as to how it was received on his forum.
My question to all if you is regarding the below quote regarding Obama - I can't find more information, but if true it is very important!
Have you heard about this?
Please share what you know re: this "decree"
Quote below followed by link for entire post.
---------------
Important notice-
Through presidential decree signed into law by His Excellency president Obama early this week, with this decree now the technologies developed by Keshe Foundation and similar to it for space technology and their use by other Governments has become a criminal offence.
Which, this means that scientists from this week cannot release their technology to public or any governments any more unless is beneficial for use in war and in benefit of western arm manufactures nations.
We do not accept such castration of science and we ask the United state of America's government for clear clarification of this decree by the White House.
Is this law to silence the Keshe Foundation and other research organisations or can American bring pressure that only their technology can be accepted throughout the world.
This act of the presidential decree is against international scientific freedom for development, research and information sharing and this is a gagging order of scientific organisations like ours.
Please inform your press.
M T Keshe
taken from this post:
http://www.keshefoundation.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=2482
Hervé
28th April 2012, 19:14
Seems this needs to be emphasized:
Uploaded by souljaboyspongebob (http://www.youtube.com/user/souljaboyspongebob) on Apr 18, 2011
Remember the "California Missile?"
Nobody Launched a Missile Last Night (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?7912-Nobody-Launched-a-Missile-Last-Night)
More precisely: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?7912-Nobody-Launched-a-Missile-Last-Night&p=68028&viewfull=1#post68028
DreamsInDigital
28th April 2012, 19:31
I truly wish to make sense of all this within my lifetime. The more I look outward, the more convoluted.
So, who did shoot down this missile? Why?
Well, in all reality it would not have mattered if the ETs did it or someone else, but everyone had their weapons on that North Korean Missile, including the Russians with their Scalar Weapons. Every other North Korean Missile has been shot off it's launcher. North Korea is considered a threat to just about everyone. They've got an Insane Dictator for a Leader, that's enough for anyone to be mildly concerned at least. And, N-Korea lied about the purpose and contents of the missile, it was claimed to be a Satellite and turned out to be a fully functional ICBM with a Mock Nuclear War head and Topography System. One of the last public mainstream media things had that Nut Case Ruler making claims he could wipe South Korea off the map in 4 minutes. Do we really want to let them even get one missile off successfully? Nope. Edit: Just watched the video and noticed that the video is not talking about the N-Korea missile that was shot down by ETs, but one shot down off the coast of california. Oops. Btw, the lady interviewed was probably contacted by Alphabet Soup Agents and threatened and that is likely why she changed her tune so quickly.
The GFL is an entity from an Regressive Reptoid AI Ship. - ?
Yes, so is Salusa, St. Michael, That Grerer character associated with the Neptune Ship, St. Germaine (when channeled), most but not all pleiadian messages when they are channeled come from this AI, Ashtar Command messages when channeled come from this AI (when they are not channeled, the real Ashtar Command is in collaboration with the Bavarian Illuminati, the same psychopaths we're fighting against). Etc. 96% of Channeled Messages either come from that AI ship, or like The Council Of Nine for example, comes from an CIA Mind Control Program. I think the Machine Intelligence they use for that is called Vellon or Veleon (I'm just not clear on the spelling). Basically, the best way to handle channeled messages IMO is like Inspirational Fictional Stories. If you pay attention to the patterns with "Salusa", every time (like clockwork) an big disclosure about anything, exactly the next day after "Salusa" has an opinion about it. Since about somewhere in the 1970's the GFL and Salusa et al have been making the same empty promises and doing that "sit back and we'll handle it for you" disempowering messages. Which is not good, at all. The other thing to take notice, the excessive amounts of plagiarism in the Channeled messages is absurd. If you guys go read the comments sections on the last few David Wilcock blogs, just check out the comments. There are several people there even that have some very solid information about the GFL, Salsusa, etc being from the AI Reptoid Ship. There is even a few threads on the forum here where others that have experience weighed in on it, and videos from youtube of others with their own personal experiences. So, don't just take my word for it, research...see for your selves, look up the leads I'm providing here.
The Andromedans are not liars, not all Pleiadians are bad, just should be taken (like any ET/ED messages,information IMO) with some caution and consideration, as has been mentioned by multiple contactees there is a rogue group of Alpha Centaurians that claim to be Pleiadians but aren't, they're even less trustworthy. But, you know different people are going to argue for hours and days who is or isn't trust worthy among the ranks of the ET/EDs, and will go around around around, ultimately everyone has the ability to make contact with real ET/EDs. There are a good handful at least of contactees here on this forum that have their own experiences, and just as many skeptics/non-believers that will sit and debunk (at least attempt anyway) everything they say, even without the evidence and experience/knowledge to do so. I've had my own experiences for 20+ years with ETs, including physical contacts, I've researched many other Contactees, developed my own instincts and inner sense of knowing. So, I'm comfortable with my own experiences and knowledge base to know for me, who is or isn't or the good guys from the bad guys. Everyone needs to develop their own instincts and trust their own inner sense of knowing as they develop it, to guide them for themselves on what is good, bad, evil, not evil, etc. From what I have gathered, understand, etc. The only real enemies we have, are the Regressive Reptoids and Grays. That's it.
Unified Serenity
30th April 2012, 05:09
Has anyone thought about the Breitbart story anymore? It's like he had this bombshell ready to be released, and then after his death they dribbled out some lame story as if that was the bombshell. Now today I read on WND:
WND EXCLUSIVE
Breitbart's coroner poisoned to death?
Police probe mysterious demise of L.A. medical examiner
Medical examiners in Los Angeles are investigating the possible poisoning death of one of their own officials who may have worked on the case of Andrew Breitbart (http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/conservative-warrior-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012-2/), the conservative firebrand who died March 1, the same day Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced probable cause for forgery in President Obama’s birth certificate (http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/).
Michael Cormier, a respected forensic technician for the Los Angeles County Coroner died under suspicious circumstances at his North Hollywood home April 20, the same day Breitbart’s cause of death was finally made public.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/breitbarts-coroner-poisoned-to-death/
pugwash84
1st May 2012, 11:34
I know everyone seems to hate Obama but I actually find him quite charming :) and he is so funny. I watched this speech and people are probably going to despise me for saying this but he seems so sweet and charming to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GfG8Btb0l3g
.....but then saying that I don't have to live with him as my president. :p
AlternativeInfoJunkie
1st May 2012, 12:05
Well i would agree that he is quite charming... It's just that he is a war mongering, liberty snatching, corporate shill. And no I don't despise you or anybody else for thinking otherwise. :o
GlassSteagallfan
1st May 2012, 12:34
Apparently, he can take jokes too...
Jimmy Kimmel Hosts the 2012 White House Correspondents' Dinner
Jimmy Kimmel to Obama: "Remember when the country rallied around you in hope for a better tomorrow? ...That was a good one."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vK8ID0Eki68
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vK8ID0Eki68
jackovesk
1st May 2012, 13:11
I know everyone seems to hate Obama but I actually find him quite charming :) and he is so funny. I watched this speech and people are probably going to despise me for saying this but he seems so sweet and charming to me.
.....but then saying that I don't have to live with him as my president. :p
The word Pity not Despise came to mind before I read the final sentence of your post...
pugwash I will allow you your sense of humour, but myself (I don't find anything remotely Funny or Entertaining about Obama)...:nono:
http://rense.com/1.imagesH/ob1splash2.jpg
wynderer
1st May 2012, 13:13
i think he's a clone, or has been cloned, myself
AlternativeInfoJunkie
1st May 2012, 13:18
[QUOTE=GlassSteagallfan;479268]Apparently, he can take jokes too...
Jimmy Kimmel Hosts the 2012 White House Correspondents' Dinner
Jimmy Kimmel to Obama: "Remember when the country rallied around you in hope for a better tomorrow? ...That was a good one."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vK8ID0Eki68
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vK8ID0Eki68[/QUOTE
Bah. It's good politics to be able to take a joke. Imagine if he said "you sonofabitch jimmy kimmel! I HATE YOU!" Not only would it add credibility to jimmy's comedic critique, but it would make obama look like a stuck up square who can't take a joke. It would make him look like an elitist which is not good for politics. Trust me he's a snob. He just hides it well.
mountain_jim
1st May 2012, 13:27
Just don't make the mistake of thinking Romney or the GOP is any better, and probably worse, to the extent they are even-more in the thrall of Israel's leaders and Mossad, who, according to Duff and others, have already attempted to assasinate Obama more than once.
Ron Paul is the only 'candidate' speaking any Truth at all, and if he somehow got in power the elites would probably still find a way to control him also.
That's why Disclosure of Everything is so important, the current corrupt system and direction can not be sustained.
truth4me
1st May 2012, 14:26
i think he's a clone, or has been cloned, myself you my friend have took the words right out of my mouth as the old saying goes......check this out.
vimeo.com/6747788
AlternativeInfoJunkie
1st May 2012, 17:34
Just don't make the mistake of thinking Romney or the GOP is any better, and probably worse, to the extent they are even-more in the thrall of Israel's leaders and Mossad, who, according to Duff and others, have already attempted to assasinate Obama more than once.
Ron Paul is the only 'candidate' speaking any Truth at all, and if he somehow got in power the elites would probably still find a way to control him also.
That's why Disclosure of Everything is so important, the current corrupt system and direction can not be sustained.
Who said anything about the GOP being better (except for ron paul)? As far as i'm concerned obama and romney are the same person. You can have this goldman sachs candidate or that goldman sachs candidate. There is no difference.
Unified Serenity
1st May 2012, 17:42
As RP has been mentioned, i will just say that there is a coup of sorts brewing in the GOP, and RP has been gaining delegates. There will be a split convention, and we could very well have RP as our nominee. Of course we could get Jeb Bush too...... I don't even want to go there.
My view is I don't care what sense of humor or how charming someone is. If they are an assh*ole, then that is the only thing I notice. Obama's fruit speaks loudly and thanks to Jacko for that lil image.
Cidersomerset
1st May 2012, 19:32
SEALs slam Obama for using them as 'ammunition' in bid to take credit for bin Laden killing during election campaign
By Toby Harnden
PUBLISHED: 00:35, 1 May 2012 | UPDATED: 16:42, 1 May 2012
Comments (613)
Share
Serving and former US Navy SEALs have slammed President Barack Obama for taking the credit for killing Osama bin Laden and accused him of using Special Forces operators as ‘ammunition’ for his re-election campaign.
The SEALs spoke out to MailOnline after the Obama campaign released an ad entitled ‘One Chance’.
In it President Bill Clinton is featured saying that Mr Obama took ‘the harder and the more honourable path’ in ordering that bin Laden be killed. The words ‘Which path would Mitt Romney have taken?’ are then displayed.
Besides the ad, the White House is marking the first anniversary of the SEAL Team Six raid that killed bin Laden inside his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan with a series of briefings and an NBC interview in the Situation Room designed to highlight the ‘gutsy call’ made by the President.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/01/article-2137636-12D85064000005DC-985_468x322.jpg
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137636/Osama-bin-Laden-death-SEALs-slam-Obama-using-ammunition-bid-credit.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Channel 4 News
CATCH UP Programme at 1900 weekdays, weekend timings see listings
Search Channel 4 News
Bin Laden killing turns into US election row
Tuesday 01 May 2012
A year after US special forces shot dead the world's most wanted terrorist, bin Laden's death has sparked a furious political row. A risky tactic by President Obama - now could it backfire?
Barack Obama (reuters)
President Obama says it was the longest 40 minutes of his life: the moment he made the decision to send special forces into Pakistan to take out Osama bin Laden. A year after the al-Qaeda leader was shot dead, Obama has given journalists unprecedented access inside the situation room of the White House, telling NBC News of the silence that fell inside the room, as the dramatic events unfolded.
Mr Obama insisted it was not an occasion to celebrate, but he has come under fire from his Republicans rivals for using the raid as a key part of his re-election campaign, starting with a video entitled 'One Chance', released on Friday, which commended his ability to take tough decisions as commander-in-chief.
BD75KOoNR9k
The theme was pressed home in another video, showcasing the Obama campaign's new slogan, 'Forward': the death of bin Laden, it claimed, was "the victory no-one saw coming". Vice President Joe Biden, campaigning in New York, suggested it was "legitimate" to ask whether the terrorist leader would still be alive if the Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney had been in charge.
A pathetic political act of self congratulation. John McCain
That one hurt: the outraged response was instant. Senator John McCain described the campaign ad as a "pathetic political act of self-congratulation", and in a statement hosted on the RNC website, accused Obama of doing "a shameless end-zone dance to help himself get re-elected." The former defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld took to Twitter to vent his spleen, while there was even unease on the left, with Ariana Huffington describing the whole strategy as "despicable".
Getting personal
On Monday things ramped up still further, as the President himself was asked about the issue at a press conference with the Japanese premier. He alluded to the fact that Mitt Romney had previously been on record as questioning the value of "moving heaven and earth" to catch al-Qaeda leaders. "I'd just recommend that everybody take a look at people's previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and take out Bin Laden."
Cue Romney, on the stump in New Hampshire, who insisted that any American would have taken the same decision as Obama. "Of course, of course. Even Jimmy Carter would have given that order," he quipped. Of course there is no way of knowing what Romney would have decided, if he had been in that situation room. But it is hardly a novel tactic in politics, to use a president's definining moment of military success for some kind of electoral advantage.
There are countless examples from the 2004 campaign, for example, where the Bush campaign declared that Saddam Hussein would "not only be in Baghdad, he would be in Kuwait", if John Kerry had been in the White House. No matter. There is a backstory to take into consideration here, that of a growing, and incresingly vociferous military lobby against the current President.
I hardly think you've seen excessive celebrating here. President Obama
Anger among some of the more conservative Navy Seals, claims the Buzzfeed website, has been brewing for months, highlighted by an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal earlier this year, by former Seal Leif Babin. Under the banner headline "Obama exploits the Navy Seals", he criticised the administration's "lack of discretion", concluding: "It is infuriating to see political gain put above the safety and security of our brave warriors and our long term strategic goals."
A question of judgement
As with most definining political moments, however, this one is all down to a judgement call. President Obama's judgement, on that special forces raid, and the judgement of his campaign team, to use the anniversary of that moment now. On the face of it, it might appear disingenuous for the Republicans to insist that the bin Laden killing should be out of bounds, in the President's bid to win re-election.
"I hardly think you've seen excessive celebrating here", Obama said on Monday, and indeed, his team have already moved on to another target - Mitt Romney's Swiss bank accounts, and his extensive financial assets around the globe. Polls suggest that that all-important demographic, the 'Walmart Moms', care not one jot about terrorism and foreign policy, but the economy and making ends meet.
But still: cameras inside the situation room, and a president whose experience and courage under fire was questioned from the moment he ran for office. Turning a military triumph into something to shout about seems understandable, under those circumstances.
http://www.channel4.com/news/bin-laden-killing-turns-into-us-election-row
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.