PDA

View Full Version : First direct photograph of a strand of DNA



Bongo
4th December 2012, 22:44
http://www.blogster.com/anacoana/first-direct-photograph-of-a-strand-of-dna

The famous 'double-helix' structure of DNA has become one of the most recognisable images in science since its discovery by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953.

Back then, scientists had to use X-ray crystallography - a form of imaging where atoms are fired at DNA strands, and patterns of dots are converted into images with the help of complex maths - to uncover the structure.

But Scientists have taken the first direct photograph of a strand of DNA.

But now the first-ever true photograph of DNA has been taken with an electron microsope , showing the miniscule structure directly.

dna_temthumb550xauto106248

Above: DNA, photographed

Enzo di Fabrizio from the University of Genoa, Italy took the photo by pulling a strand of DNA and propping it up between two silicon pillars.

To create the image itself, he made small holes in the base of the nanopillar bed and shone electrons at it, revealing the DNA.

Di Fabrizio says that with better imaging, it may even be possible to photograph DNA at the level of single molecules.

His paper, Direct Imaging of DNA Fibers: The Visage of Double Helix, is available to read online.

has been taken with an electron microsope , showing the miniscule structure directly.

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/883866/thumbs/o-DNA_TEMTHUMB550XAUTO106248-570.jpg?4

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/cimages/var/ezwebin_site/storage/images/coast-to-coast/repository/photos/dna-photographed-for-the-first-time/686824-1-eng-US/DNA-Photographed-for-the-First-Time.jpg

another link from a different website
http://phys.org/news/2012-12-capture-high-contrast-image-band.html

Sidney
5th December 2012, 06:54
Am I the only one that doesn't believe that the dna hasn't been photographed before now? Sorry, just not buying it.

Demeisen
5th December 2012, 08:14
I have read many years that new strand(s) should be activating in our DNA. Is there any scientific evidence of this? If they now can take photographs, it should be easy to verify.
I would imagine it's a news with cat sized letters. Not seen any.

WhiteFeather
5th December 2012, 13:15
Some speak of the new children having 3 strands. Im curious myself.

Atlas
24th September 2016, 10:31
Some speak of the new children having 3 strands. Im curious myself.
Related threads:


projectavalon.net/Boy-Born-with-3-strands-of-DNA (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?18245-Boy-Born-with-3-strands-of-DNA)


projectavalon.net/What-would-people-say-if-humans-begin-to-have-3-strands-of-DNA (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?17770-What-would-people-say-if-humans-begin-to-have-3-strands-of-DNA)