View Full Version : What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??
jerry
3rd December 2014, 11:45
Great video, thanks for posting. I remember when I first realized/believed it was a hoax, I kept wanting to discuss it with family and friends - mostly because I thought it was WONDERFUL that no children died. I was far more excited by that than the hoax aspect. However, my enthusiasm was greeted with shock, disdain, and absolute refusal to consider it being a false flag - "how can you disrespect the families and the deaths of those children". Sadly, it is those people who need to see this video and most likely will not.I never even went there for the longest time. I felt there was something wrong with the story with more to it than we had been told . It was after watching Halbig I finally realized they where at it again. People have to wake up and understand MSM are the keepers of the gate for the elites and actually take pride in disseminating the lies that they know are lies.
jake gittes
3rd December 2014, 16:19
Thanks for posting. Will watch later when I have extended time. For those with limited time and would like a Sandy Hook morsel, I highly recommend
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGzYlPoPE1s
Segment beginning around 8:43 is guaranteed to make you grin, giggle or guffaw! (Thanks me if you laughs!)
aranuk
4th December 2014, 01:35
Yes it looks to me that Sandy Hook is an artificial place where the CIA or and the Illuminati have populated for future use to be available for whatever propaganda to be used against the ordinary citizens of USA.
Stan
robinr1
4th December 2014, 03:24
that is a very interesting take.......I hadn't considered that perspective....but it may just be spot on...
robin
Yes it looks to me that Sandy Hook is an artificial place where the CIA or and the Illuminati have populated for future use to be available for whatever propaganda to be used against the ordinary citizens of USA.
Stan
nancyb
4th December 2014, 04:45
that is a very interesting take.......I hadn't considered that perspective....but it may just be spot on...
robin
Yes it looks to me that Sandy Hook is an artificial place where the CIA or and the Illuminati have populated for future use to be available for whatever propaganda to be used against the ordinary citizens of USA.
Stan
I agree with the idea, which I hadn't thought of it either - a well oiled and primed "machine" that has most people under its spell. What amazes me is that it doesn't take a lot of digging to begin to question the event. The parent interviews alone are suspect - too calm and rational too soon after losing a child, didn't make sense to me.
aranuk
4th December 2014, 19:02
that is a very interesting take.......I hadn't considered that perspective....but it may just be spot on...
robin
Yes it looks to me that Sandy Hook is an artificial place where the CIA or and the Illuminati have populated for future use to be available for whatever propaganda to be used against the ordinary citizens of USA.
Stan
I agree with the idea, which I hadn't thought of it either - a well oiled and primed "machine" that has most people under its spell. What amazes me is that it doesn't take a lot of digging to begin to question the event. The parent interviews alone are suspect - too calm and rational too soon after losing a child, didn't make sense to me.
What is also astounding is the transparency of all the "witnesses" testaments. You don't really need to be anything close to a Sherlock Holmes to see through how artificial the witnesses behavior irregularities re and how what they all say doesn't add up. The acting is really bad too. It's as if the stage management of the whole affair is deliberately meant to look suspicious. Why would they do that? I don't know why. I have heard that after a real car crash that real witnesses who saw the event with their own eyes often or always have different recollection of the event. Perhaps that's maybe what they were attempting to achieve, rather than have them all telling the same story. In a real event if ten people say the perpetrator was wearing a bright yellow jacket and and two say it was an orange jacket, the police will reasonably conclude that the jacket was indeed yellow. However in a real event I am most certain that if say five witnesses all say the jacket was five different colours the police would know that they were all lying. Do you see where I am going here? None of their stories add up to look real. Real detectives hearing all the sroties would come to the conclusion that there was indeed a conspiracy to falsify the event.
Stan
Vangelo
5th December 2014, 21:17
Ughghg, its no longer available on youtube.... I got half way through and went back just now to watch the rest. Does anyone have a copy or another link?
Edit by Bill: here's another version (and a further one freely downloadable on the Avalon Server)
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?77616-Video-We-need-to-talk-about-Sandy-Hook&p=911259&viewfull=1#post911259
ThePythonicCow
5th December 2014, 22:17
Ughghg, its no longer available on youtube.... I got half way through and went back just now to watch the rest. Does anyone have a copy or another link?
I had made a copy before it was taken down (again). Download TalkAboutSandyHook.mp4 (http://thepythoniccow.us/TalkAboutSandyHook.mp4).
aviators
5th December 2014, 23:13
Yes it looks to me that Sandy Hook is an artificial place where the CIA or and the Illuminati have populated for future use to be available for whatever propaganda to be used against the ordinary citizens of USA.
Stan
Well stated! Is this from a movie ???
Stepford wives came to mind.........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkfaRh__E6U
nancyb
5th December 2014, 23:29
I had made a copy before it was taken down (again). Download TalkAboutSandyHook.mp4 (http://thepythoniccow.us/TalkAboutSandyHook.mp4).
Yay!!!!!! Thank you!!!! I watched it, but wanted to share it later!!!
jerry
6th December 2014, 03:48
http://www.mediasolidarity.com/watch_video.html
this is the original site that launched it and its still up many of the links available are cut short send this link to share or copy with full 2.5 hr length here
jerry
6th December 2014, 04:15
They Are Running SCARED! Viral Sandy Hook Movie Taken Down AGAIN — Here’s The Scoop pHxGgI2AveE
turiya
6th December 2014, 22:43
LATEST VIDEO TAKEDOWN
http://curezone.com/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/Rense/SANDY_HOOK/COPYRIGHT_CLAIM_BY_HONR_NETOWRK.png
New location to find video:
http://curezone.com/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/Rense/SANDY_HOOK/ARCHIVE_ORG_VIDEO.png (https://archive.org/details/WeNeedToTalkAboutSandyHook_201412)
We are a loose knit group of independent journalists, normal people
with normal lives, who have families, children and jobs. What unites
us is a quest to find the truth about what happened in Sandy Hook.
This movie is part of the collection: Community Video
Producer: Independent Media Solidarity
Language: English
Keywords: sandy hook; newtown; shooting; conspiracy; adam lanza; false flag; gun control; depopulation; sandy hook elementary; school shooting; staged; hoax; actors; fake; sandy hook truthers; hoaxers
Creative Commons license: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
jerry
7th December 2014, 05:26
This is the video I think if I can get those in my family to watch I may have a good shot of them beginning to see things for what they truly are.
http://www.mediasolidarity.com/watch_video.html
avid
7th December 2014, 20:31
Michael Janitch/aka Dutchsinse has been taken down totally in social media.
The last toxic info was to say who it was that was taking down anything questionning Sandy Hook.
“due to a copyright claim by HONR Network"
This is a major Zio-intervention on freedom of speech.
The only link I have now is via a furious Tatoott (he's really angry - please excuse his profanities)
8c3yB1mXB7A
There is also a problem with someone called (Mr) Pozner, who is ripping off taxpayers et al, or is there something more to this? Too many truths are public now, so the media are now reiterating blatant lies lately about Sandy Hook, in the last couple of days!!! Will it never go away? Layers of lies eventually collapse.
These are the last comments before Dutchsinse before he was publically innihilated:
Diatribe warning (yet again)
A message to Leonard Pozner, and the families of Sandy Hook who are using their childrens tragedy to raise MILLIONS of dollars, several million of which have come from the public taxpayers....
So, the families of Sandy Hook use some of the money you raised to start a company to go online and file false claims of "copyright" against videos you don't like the content of?
This is called "trolling". When you file a false claim to have a video removed which you don't personally like the content of. Not because the video violates any laws , but because that is the only avenue they can use to remove a video.
Using your "victim" status to censor other citizens thoughts? Using the kids deaths to troll those looking into said childrens deaths?!
Using the tragedy to get paid, but then not allowing anyone to look into the people raising the money?!
A case of "free speech for me, but not for THEE"...
I made a video looking into the guy filing all these copyright claims on youtube, and HE FILED A FALSE COPYRIGHT AGAINST MY VIDEO showing who he is!
Public information on a public search on my public channel shared to my public audience.. and they claimed a "right" to my content to get it removed.
Abuse of the legal copyright system to have something removed which they don't like.
Copyright claims are supposed to be used for protecting ARTISTS and videomakers like myself (musicians, scientists, educators, and even comedians etc..) ... protecting our custom created content and opinions from theft.
To use the copyright system to file FALSE claims is no better than censorship by arresting someone under false charges to silence them in the public domain . Dictators do this. Fascists do this. And now rich Sandy Hook people are doing it to average citizens like me.
This is a case of a rich guy who stands to gain a boat load more using a 2 year old tragedy, who then uses a company he creates with the money he already raised from the TAXPAYERS (and public donations) to file false claims in order to stop a message they don't personally like.
All because I looked into the guys public information?
Do you think he understands that when he filed a false copyright claim, he falsely PUBLICLY accused me of a CRIME which can carry a sentence up to 20+ years in prison, and carry great fines as well.
So the Sandy Hook family(ies) think google searches of images are not to be shown publicly? I have an educational, 1st amendment right to look into public documents, and make those documents known to others.
Get the word out to the public, you can't use google images to look through public images any more! :) You now have to ask permission to look in google images! (LOL total BS LOL)
Filing a "copyright" claim against a THUMBNAIL of a picture of Noah Pozner which appears with 100 other pictures on a search page? Using that as the reason to file a copyright? Its not shown for even 10 seconds (which is covered under most fair use law).
For the record, I was never really a Sandy Hook "conspiracy" believer, but after today, since I got slammed for just LOOKING INTO ONE OF THE PEOPLE FILING CLAIMS, I'm starting to second guess my original stick in the mud skepticism. Something odd could be going on with Sandy Hook.
I'm leaning towards GREED, as opposed to "conspiracy". :\
You guys know me and debunking BS on youtube... debunking Comet ISON hitting earth.. debunking plastic snow falling from the sky.... debunking the brooms standing on their ends over a fake "pole shift"...... debunking the UFO's which were really computer animation.... debunking Epizuti end of the world talk..... debunking myself even with the tweets from 2012.... or how about debunking ISIS photoshopping the executions...... debunking the claims recently about the National Guard / Military starting fires here in St. Louis.
Now.. here is a guy from Sandy Hook slamming me for looking into him? Filing false legal claims to get his way?! This is what $ does to people, I bet this guy used to be cool at some point in his life.
No way he could have been this big a douche before all this mess.
Either this guy is a legit fool , an out of control victim family member who now thinks THEIR way is the right way, and everyone else's rights can take back seat to theirs........ or he's a shill up to no good.
There is the slight possibility that this is NOT the guy at all, and that he has an impersonator online who is filing false claims in his name to smear the Sandy Hook families, and also smear "truthers" who come back and respond nastily.
I can tell you at this point, regardless of being a victim of a shooting spree 2 years ago, we should not let "victims" (or anyone else for that matter) dictate terms of free speech upon the masses.
Victims can be irate, inflexible, unfair, and even can sometimes be delusional in their responses to situations which remind them of their tragedy. Which leads me to ask why a man would go online and pick a fight with EVERYONE talking about Sandy Hook, even the people who are not doing anything illegal, or improper.
This family started filing claims on videos , we have a right to look into who is filing the claims. They do not have a right to censor a video where I am looking up who is filing the claims against several fellow videomakers on youtube.
As soon as I did look them up, they came and got me unfairly. Thus, finally, I must say this most likely means the other videos were taken down the same way. Unjustly.
I know Dutchsinse is honest and open, has good research, so please find out what's happened, as it is, a truther been much maligned, and 'shut-down' for exposés.
Thank you, Avid.
Snoweagle
7th December 2014, 21:27
Very powerful message.
Here are the links the author and narrator referred to in the video:
Published on 6 Dec 2014
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT – FROM SANDHOOK TO OBOLA TO FREE SPEECH NO BULL ****
http://www.tatoott1009.com/in-case-yo...
We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook – Full Video in Higher Quality
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/12/03...
Upside Down Flag On The Back Of 1950 Currency the truth can hurt ?
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/12/02...
Gas For Less Than 25 Cents Per Gallon ! Gold Standard
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/12/01...
Military Police Caught Setting Fires In Ferguson & 10 demands BULL SH-T ALERT GET YOUR POPCORN
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/30...
It Looks Like We Are Already In Stage One Of Martial Law
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/29...
The Zombie Nation goes “DEMOCRACY” Shopping Black Friday Stampeding MOB
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/28...
Family Boy’s fatal shooting could have been avoided
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/27...
Boy with fake gun dies "A 12-year-old boy" after shot by Ohio officer
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/23...
Researchers Announce Advance in Image-Recognition Software
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/23...
Missouri police can’t stop media recordings
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/22...
Myron May: Top 10 Facts You Need to Know
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/21...
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING “The Truth About the Michael Brown Shooting” IT’S A COVER UP
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/19...
World Doesn’t Need More Democracy, A majority may be as tyrannical as a single dictator
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/18...
Handicapped man with no legs and caregiver assaulted by cops *VIDEO*
http://fprnradio.com/handicapped-man-...
Will the country called the united states of America please stand up!
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/16...
Conspiracy 9/11 Conspiracy Author Marshall & His 2 Kids Found Dead – CIA killed Marshall for leaking 9/11 secrets: Dr. Kevin Barrett ?
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/15...
Is This a Satellite Photo of Flight MH17 being Shot Down by a Ukrainian Fighter Jet?
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/14...
CACHE IS KING How To Expose A Liar /
http://tatsrevolution.com/cache-is-ki...
Ferguson’s neighbor warns residents to prepare for the worst
http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/11/13...
tatoott1009.com
http://tatoott1009.com/
Tat's Revolution.com
http://tatsrevolution.com/
tatoott1009 twitter
https://twitter.com/tatsrevolution
tatoott1009.blogspot.
http://tatoott1009.blogspot.com/
facebook tatoott1009 official
https://www.facebook.com/tatoott1009o...
stumbleupon
https://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/...
dailymotion
https://www.dailymotion.com/TATS-2-MI...
wordpress
https://www.tatoott1009.wordpress.com
tatoott1009
https://www.youtube.com/user/tatoott1009
Tatoott1009Reloaded
https://www.youtube.com/user/Tatoott1...
Download what you can and distribute by hand if neccessary. Keep spreading the word. Namaste
Knowrainknowrainbows!
7th December 2014, 22:27
I follow dutchsinse too. He's back up and running ... Link to website ...
http://dutchsinse.com/
KRKR
jerry
8th December 2014, 18:11
This is a bump for the thread as its the main story that can do some good in opening eyes to the insanity of our government in their quest to rule the world with an iron fist that will make Germany 1930s look like a trip to Disney world
http://www.mediasolidarity.com/watch_video.html
avid
8th December 2014, 18:45
This beggars belief - is there any justice in this 'social media' CABAL? If you were his 'friend' or subscribed to his channel/s, are you now on a 'blacklist'? This absolutely stinks. Some nasty set-up is covertly 'protecting' the now much-maligned media lies about 'Sandy Hook'. One of the many instances of 'drills' going 'live' and the controlled media affecting the whole world, with fabrications.
Some of these 'crisis actors' have been proven many times, from fake 'assassination attempts' of a miraculously-healed lady politician, to amputees pretending to being amputees again.... (Boston Marathon). Sandy Hook was proven to be yet another attempt to control gun ownership across the USA. We can see all the patterns now, from before the duplicitous '9/11' (an excuse to invade the world via corporatocracy) et al....
jerry
9th December 2014, 18:39
tzF69EM6oy4 A behind the scenes look and discussion of the making of the ground breaking blockbuster exposing the crimes of the false flag emergency drill Sandy Hook. We Need To Talk .....The video expresses the magnitude of exposure with factual succinct ion. After watching no one can honestly deny we where lied to and manipulated to an extent that is beyond criminal. It shows the extent at which the cover up continues with the collaboration of officials and media and the importance of having it stopped.
The following link is one that has not been successfully attacked and removed from the web . My suggestion is if able download copy and share while its still available
http://www.mediasolidarity.com/watch_video.html
jerry
11th December 2014, 04:52
The new video is available due to many putting it out there as fast as they are taking them down. Also I phones and digital media providers have it blocked. They are going to some extreme measures to keep it from being viewed . This is a wake up call for anyone still not understanding how we are being controlled and that MSM is state run propaganda. People are waking up in droves and gives me hope that we will defeat the evil cabal by exposing them and forcing arrests and prosecution of all those involved. I think its begun and something is gonna give good or bad its long overdue
"Govt created a monster’: 1000s protest police violence across US for 3rd night"
Thousands of people in New York and other US cities protested for a third night against the use of lethal force by policeThousands of people in New York and other US cities protested for a third night against the use of lethal force by police against minorities, as prosecutors pledged to consider charges against an officer in the killing of an unarmed black man last month.
The killing of 28-year-old Akai Gurley, who was gunned down in November by a police officer in a darkened public housing stairwell in Brooklyn, is the latest in an avalanche of deadly police actions across the country which many deem racially-biased.
Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson said Friday he will convene a grand jury to consider possible charges against Peter Liang, who shot Gurley. Police there have said Liang may have accidentally discharged his gun. At a news conference Friday, the president of the advocacy group BK Nation, Kevin Powell, called the shooting the latest in a “series of modern-day lynchings.”This week’s outbreak of angry but mostly peaceful protests began Wednesday when a New York grand jury refused to bring charges against white officer Daniel Pantaleo in the death of a 43-year-old black father of six, Eric Garner, who was being arrested on suspicion of selling cigarettes illegally.
A video of his confrontation with police on Staten Island in July featured Pantaleo’s arm across Garner’s neck as he is subdued by four officers. Then Garner, who had no weapon, was knocked face down to the pavement as he repeatedly said, “I can’t breathe.” The grand jury sat for nine weeks and eventually decided to take no action against Officer Pantaleo.
Last month a Missouri grand jury also chose not to indict Darren Wilson, a white policeman, for the killing of an 18-year-old unarmed black man Michael Brown in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson in August, provoking several nights of unrest. The grand jury in Ferguson heard over 70 hours of testimony deciding whether to indict, USA Today reported.
Activists on Friday concluded a protest march to the Missouri governor’s mansion. More than 100 protesters shouted, “Hands up, don’t shoot,” and other slogans as they rallied in the rotunda of the state capitol in Jefferson City.
On Thursday in Phoenix, Arizona, another unarmed black man was shot dead by a white police officer during a scuffle, leading to protests in that city.
“The government has created a monster and the monster is now loose,” Soraya Soi Free, 45, a nurse from the Bronx who has been protesting in New York, told Reuters.
The decisions by grand juries in Ferguson and New York not to indict white police officers have angered ordinary Americans and human rights experts alike.
“I am concerned by the grand juries’ decisions and the apparent conflicting evidence that exists relating to both incidents,” UN Special Rapporteur on minority issues, Rita Izsak, said in a statement.
“The decisions leave many with legitimate concerns relating to a pattern of impunity when the victims of excessive use of force come from African-American or other minority communities.”
On Friday over a hundred demonstrators stormed into an Apple Store in New York to stage a brief “die-in,” sprawling on the floor as shoppers and employees watched. They shortly left the store without incident.
Similar mini-demonstrations were staged at Macy’s flagship department store in Herald Square and at Grand Central Terminal. Police calmly stood by, letting the protesters briefly occupy the locations.
Meanwhile, up to 100 people gathered near the site of Garner’s death for a candlelight vigil on Staten Island. A group of marchers who pressed on through the rain were confronted by police on Manhattan’s lower East Side before midnight. Several protesters were arrested, Reuters reported.
Protests also unfolded in Chicago, Boston and Washington, DC, with demonstrators chanting “Black lives matter,” and “I can’t breathe.”https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B4JbCdYIUAAih4K.jpg
Curious77
11th December 2014, 08:17
People have to wake up and understand MSM are the keepers of the gate for the elites and actually take pride in disseminating the lies that they know are lies.
I'd call it more like CIA/corporate media --
but I think 9/11 also made clear that many were active participants in the hoax of 9/11?
Bill Ryan
11th December 2014, 18:15
-------
Hi, All:
this video is fast being expunged from the net.
This version is still there (at the time of writing!) but is unlikely to be there for very long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS1GuZed8LQ
For when this disappears :) , I have it fully downloaded (538 Mb), and uploaded to the Avalon server here:
http://projectavalon.net/We_need_to_talk_about_Sandy_Hook.mp4
jerry
11th December 2014, 18:28
Thank You Bill
This is great because every time I share it I'm told they cant find it or when trying to view myself I find its been blocked or taken down
I actually ordered 100 recordable cds and plan on passing those out to everyone I think may watch . This documentary is coffin nails to those behind this charade. ive been on it from day one this is one that needs to go viral.
-------
Hi, All:
this video is fast being expunged from the net.
This version is still there (at the time of writing!) but is unlikely to be there for very long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS1GuZed8LQ
For when this disappears :) , I have it fully downloaded (538 Mb), and uploaded to the Avalon server here:
http://projectavalon.net/We_need_to_talk_about_Sandy_Hook.mp4
Curious77
12th December 2014, 07:05
Thank you Bill and Jerry and hope to look at it tomorrow morning --
but I'm also passing it along to other websites right now --
And we certainly do need to talk about Sandy Hook --
Thanks
.
ThePythonicCow
12th December 2014, 11:36
Here's a long article describing the trials and tribulations that this video, and others such, have gone through in their efforts to be published on Youtube and Vimeo.
It is now at the point where anonymous complainers, using pseudonyms, can get videos taken down, without Youtube being willing to even pretend to consider a counter-response from the uploader.
Sandy Hook Documentary Isn’t About Sandy Hook: The Fortress and What’s Inside (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/12/10/sandy-hook-documentary-isnt-about-sandy-hook-the-fortress-and-whats-inside/#more-15687):
The release of the documentary, “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook” by the group, Independent Media Solidarity has become a story of aggressive copyright fraud, a massive video upload movement and an unexpected Internet solidarity more than a story of the controversial Sandy Hook event itself.
See the link for the details. We really do need alternative means to share and publish such material.
Bill Ryan
12th December 2014, 13:24
-------
I watched the video last night. It was made by an association of eight YouTube Sandy Hook investigators, and is very 'professionally' done (i.e. very well put together).
It presented a lot of fine and well-researched detail about the event which I myself never knew at all, so it was very interesting from that perspective. (Like WOW... what a slam-dunk case for fraud.)
Meanwhile, material that's become quite widely known (like all the questions raised by investigator Wolfgang Halbig) weren't featured at all. So [for me] it really served as a kind of giant appendix to the case, and would certainly be fascinating to anyone who's been following it for a while.
jerry
12th December 2014, 17:39
-------
I watched the video last night. It was made by an association of eight YouTube Sandy Hook investigators, and is very 'professionally' done (i.e. very well put together).
It presented a lot of fine and well-researched detail about the event which I myself never knew at all, so it was very interesting from that perspective. (Like WOW... what a slam-dunk case for fraud.)
Meanwhile, material that's become quite widely known (like all the questions raised by investigator Wolfgang Halbig) weren't featured at all. So [for me] it really served as a kind of giant appendix to the case, and would certainly be fascinating to anyone who's been following it for a while. This video along with what Halbig exposed, rivals what has been done with the 911 information. It really is a slam-dunk game changer in the favor of all of us who are trying to bring the truth to the light of day among the masses
jerry
13th December 2014, 00:34
We do live in exciting times as all signs are pointing to an awakening, We are edging ever closer to that critical mass . Almost on a daily basis I have different acquaintances, family and friends bringing up the very things a year ago they ridiculed me over.
Curious77
13th December 2014, 04:41
jerry --
Just watched it -- at approx 2:20 on the video there is a list of donors --
A quick run on my calculator came up with $80 MILLION -- give or take a million.
Here's the list --
Donor/To --
$4,800,000 State Donation to Catherine Hubbard
$20,000 Musical benefit for Catherine Hubbard Foundation
$50,000 Fundraiser for "
$30,000 Catherine's Peace Team
$100,000 "
$13,666 26 Miles for Caroline Previde/?
$75,421 Chase Kowalski
$40,646 Ben's (Benjamin Wheeleer) Lighthouse
$98,000 Dawn Hochsprung Scholarship Fund
$25,500,000 Sandy Hook Victims + Families
$2,500,000 Connecticut & Newtown Police
$50,000 DEMOLISH & REBUILD Sandy Hook School
$15,000,000 Newtown .....? .... Changes Fund
$687,496 Victims' Families (Ever Ribbon Fund)
$1,300,000 Newtown from Dept of Education
$1,900,000 Newtown from Dept of Education
$7,100,000 Responders & Victims' Families from DOJ
$4,300,000 Victims' Families & WITNESSES from United Way Fund
$1,200,000 Victims' Families/Newtown Youth & Family Services
$800,000 Victims' Families & Responders from SH Community Foundation
$3,500,000 " from Sandy Hook Promise
Thank You Bill
This is great because every time I share it I'm told they cant find it or when trying to view myself I find its been blocked or taken down
I actually ordered 100 recordable cds and plan on passing those out to everyone I think may watch . This documentary is coffin nails to those behind this charade. ive been on it from day one this is one that needs to go viral.
-------
Hi, All:
this video is fast being expunged from the net.
This version is still there (at the time of writing!) but is unlikely to be there for very long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS1GuZed8LQ
For when this disappears :) , I have it fully downloaded (538 Mb), and uploaded to the Avalon server here:
http://projectavalon.net/We_need_to_talk_about_Sandy_Hook.mp4
Curious77
13th December 2014, 05:14
jerry--
Just want to comment further that IMO Sandy Hook is one of the weakest links
in the chain of false flag events inflicted on the American public --
Added to the above, there is also Obama's $500,000,000 gun control program which includes:
Background checks
High Capacity Magazines
Assault Weapons
School Security
Mental Health Screening --
And who knows what those last two will mean for American children and our schools --
Originally I thought the "gun control" angle was perhaps a cover for the operation
should it go wrong -- but seems there's a lot of money to be dug up if you pervert that idea for profit.
I'd also point to pictures of Adam Lanza at 2 hrs. 26 mins --
more likely Ryan Lanza who it is said changed his name from Adam to Ryan
perhaps around the time of his parents' divorce.
Once again we meet the issue of pictures being photo-shopped to create
a more deranged look for "Adam."
This goes back to Oswald on the cover of LIFE Magazine ...
And there has been some hint of this re the "victims" of 9/11 -- which,
though proposed many years ago, was greeted with the same disbelief as
the "no plane" theory was at first.
And, of course, once again we have ACTORS involved.
Would also bring to your attention that Mae Brussel, who investigated many
of our conspiracies, was talking about these types of "events" long, long ago.
She cited "Helter Skelter"/the Chas. Manson murders as one such event and
describes it as a military operation. You'll find the Mae Brussel playlist for her
radio programs at YouTube. You'll also find her articles on the internet.
.
.
jerry
13th December 2014, 22:39
Mae Brussel thats a new name for my list, looks like I have some homework Thanks ?
jerry
14th December 2014, 02:01
Must See: Explosive Debate Over Sandy Hook
Marathon interview covers many of the questions investigators are asking
Rob Dew moderates a debate between American Free Press writer Keith Johnson and Sandy Hook Investigator Wolfgang Halbig.....
This marathon interview covers many of the questions that investigators are asking about the events in Newtown, Conn., as we approach the second anniversary.
http://www.sandyhookjustice.com/
http://www.americanfreepress.net/
6aK0P-WxjU8
4T8_WYzH5SM
EYES WIDE OPEN
14th December 2014, 18:32
We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook & the copyright war.
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/12/10/sandy-hook-documentary-isnt-about-sandy-hook-the-fortress-and-whats-inside/#more-15687
Sandy Hook Documentary Isn’t About Sandy Hook: The Fortress and What’s Inside 152
The release of the documentary, “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook” by the group, Independent Media Solidarity has become a story of aggressive copyright fraud, a massive video upload movement and an unexpected Internet solidarity more than a story of the controversial Sandy Hook event itself.
The weakest link in a chain is the one you choose to break.WNTTASH_Poster_Art21
If you imagine manufactured events like 9/11, the Aurora theater shooting, Sandy Hook and others as links in the greater chain of deception, you might be close to understanding the circumstances in which these events are allowed to go unchecked. This chain of events cannot survive if any one of its links is broken.
On November 30th, the fortress that protects the truth about these grand deceptions was dealt a very different kind of blow. Unlike fleeting exposures or leaks of evidence that quickly get swept into the memory hole, this blow has caused a festering wound that will persist indefinitely. The opening act in this play, long in production was the release of the documentary, “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook.” This, nearly 3 hours long video exposing the numerous anomalies and ongoing cover-up is in itself an important, historical document. But, it’s the stories behind this story that are becoming a phenomenon.
A Documentary by and for the Common Man
In February of 2014, over a year since Sandy Hook many groups were deeply involved in research and analysis of the Sandy Hook event. This may come as a surprise considering that the media had long since moved on to speak of it as a well-documented, historical event. Referring to the little-understood, Adam Lanza as “the shooter” is but one example of their portrayal of the event as authentic and undeniable. What little attention the media paid to anyone who thought otherwise was limited to stories of “conspiracy theorists” harassing and even stalking victim’s family members. Behind these stories of bloggers turned stalkers was a large body of people who continued to question the event.
One such group questioning Sandy Hook was a research group on the topic comprised of 60 some odd members. Back in February, one of its members approached the group with an idea for a project that would involve a number of segments, each focusing on a different piece of evidence. The Sandy Hook event is, if you weren’t aware is brimming with anomalies and curiosities. These segments would then be combined to form a painstakingly factual and revealing expose. The only caveat was that nothing contained within a segment would be included if any of the others in the group specifically objected to it. In addition, each participant would be required to narrate their segment. The topics would be submitted to a coordinator beforehand, to prevent participants from covering the same topic.
Once a core group had formed, a repository for evidence such as photographs, video clips, news stories as well as narration scripts and cut lists was established and the work began. Over the course of 9 months, the work continued and the segments were produced with little consideration of cohesion or the end result. The coordinator and editor were tasked with producing an introductory and closing segment. As each completed segment was previewed, a picture began to form and as fate would have it the picture was that of a complete and very intriguing documentary.
Creating a Home for the Project and the Group behind It
Independent Media Solidarity
One other significant development emerged from within the project early on. One of the participants, who was also the editor had conceived of a way to give life to the project, prevent the video from becoming just a static document as well as give the group an informal identity. Without much fanfare, Independent Media Solidarity (IMS) was born. This would become the moniker under which the group could be identified. A website and various social media accounts were established in support of the group. Although the significance of this move was predicted to some degree by the group, none predicted just how significant or in which ways IMS would become a useful platform.
Video Take-Downs and the Surprising Counteraction
Long before the documentary was completed, it was determined that the usual method by which the video would be disseminated through YouTube would not work in this case. Many of the members had been stung previously by having videos flagged or removed through claims of copyright or privacy infringement. YouTube is heavily invested in the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) implementation, having designed an automated system by which to prevent copyright violations.
One component of the system is built into YouTube’s uploading function. As videos are uploaded, they are screened for audio that matches anything within a massive database of copyrighted material. If a match is found, one of two things happens. Either the uploader is presented with the option of disputing the claim or accepting it as accurate, or YouTube simply rejects the video on the basis of it being a violation of their terms. The second major component of their DMCA system involves the copyright owner making a claim against a particular video. In this process, the owner of the material flags the offending video and YouTube responds automatically by taking the video offline while notifying the video’s producer that a claim has been made. The video producer at this point must either accept the claim as accurate and forfeit the video or dispute the claim, at which time notice of the dispute is sent to the claimant.
The unfortunate side-effect of the overall process is that, during a 10 day period in which the claimant has to choose whether to take further action the video is offline.
As you might imagine this policy of allowing anyone to make a claim against any video is easily abused. The function largely favors claimants over producers of videos the claims are made against. As it stands, anyone can make a claim against any video to have it removed for a period of between 10 days and 3 weeks, and the uploader of the video has no recourse whatsoever. They are simply not afforded a means to legally challenge the claim aside from the initial dispute option. But this does nothing to prevent the take down of the video. It’s this concerning reality at the root of the next story behind the story.
As mentioned, the group chose not to upload their documentary to YouTube. After researching the options, it was determined that Vimeo would likely be the best home for the video. So, on November 30th it was uploaded to a newly established Vimeo account, a trailer was loaded to the group’s YouTube account and those of the participants. Despite there having been little hype in the time preceding its release, many people began to watch and the buzz was that people liked it.
Within less than 24 hours, Vimeo removed the video and sent notice that it was removed due to a violation of their terms. Here is the relevant text of that message…
Your video “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook” has been removed for violating our Guidelines. Reason: Vimeo does not allow videos that harass, incite hatred or depict excessive violence.
Vimeo Take-Down Notice
If you haven’t yet seen the video, this might appear to be a legitimate reason for its removal. However, if you have seen the video it’s very unlikely that you’ll find the reason given to make much sense. There simply isn’t anything that could be construed as harassment or inciting of hatred. Not only is their not excessive violence, there’s no violence depicted at all. Therefore, it appears that Vimeo chose to remove the video for other reasons. I won’t begin to speculate what those reasons were and the group hasn’t bothered to inquire further into the matter. Both Vimeo and YouTube are notoriously steadfast in their take-down decisions and rarely, if ever provide detailed explanations for them.
Although the plan had been to load the video to a secondary host as back-up, that simply hadn’t been done when the primary source at Vimeo was removed. Being faced with a newly-released video now totally unavailable, the decision was made to upload it to the group’s YouTube channel. Although it was predicted that it wouldn’t last more than a day or two, this seemed the quickest way to make the video viewable again. Concerned about and fully expecting it to be removed from YouTube, the group also scrambled to upload the video to Archive.org, which seemed like a suitable back-up source.
By this time there was a growing buzz across the Internet in places where conspiracies were discussed as well as matters of free speech. The group began to receive numerous requests through the simple contact form on its website for a copy of the video that people could upload to their channels both on YouTube and elsewhere. A completely unexpected phenomenon was showing its first signs when discussions of the take down by Vimeo was seen as unfair censorship. This generated more interest, the assumption being that for it to have been taken down so quickly what it contained must be bombshell material.
Although the matter of whether any material in the video constitutes being described as “bombshell” is relative, this notion did lead to increased interest. As the group struggled to ensure the video was viewable, considering the take-down of it at Vimeo to be a setback it was in no way a ruse by them to gen up interest through promoting a perceived notion of scarcity. This appears to have been an organic phenomenon.
YouTube Claim Summary
Then the video was taken down from YouTube. In just over 24 hours, the video was taken offline by a copyright claim made by the HONR network, represented by one Lenny Pozner. For those who may be unfamiliar with the Sandy Hook characters, Lenny is the purported father of child victim, Noah Pozner. Although Lenny wasn’t amongst the many victim’s parents making the rounds on news programs and morning shows, Lenny has been highly involved in post Sandy Hook event affairs. At the point at which it was taken down, just this single source of the video had received over 117,000 views. This was learned thanks to an observant viewer who kindly emailed a screenshot to the group.
YouTube Statistics
Some members of IMS had previously had videos removed through copyright claims. What was different in this case was that the claim made no reference to any specific material. It wasn’t possible to determine which specific material within the video was supposedly infringing on a copyright. The reader might be interested to know that, in order for a claim to be made at all the person or group making the claim must be the owner of the material. The group was perplexed, as it seemed extremely unlikely that any material in the video was owned by the HONR Network or Lenny Pozner.
Once again, the documentary was offline and a seemingly endless string of notices of this fact and requests for a different link to the video began to flood the group’s inbox. The uploading process for a nearly 3 hours long video can take many hours to complete, depending upon conditions like bandwidth availability. At the time the video was removed a second time by YouTube, the upload to Archive.org was not yet completed. Once again, the video was inaccessible for a few hours until traffic could finally be redirected to Archive.org. At this time, the primary source of the video stream remains Archive.org.
Acts of Kindness and of Rebellion
Once the dust began to settle after scrambling to keep the video online, the group finally had a chance to see a sampling of the public’s reaction to it. It was overwhelmingly positive. Some comments online read like letters written to Charles Lindbergh after landing at Le Bourget Field. Messages coming in through the contact form often referred to the group as heroes. Even in places where the tone was typically cynical and comments were often times ugly, there was a swell of appreciation for the producers and many recommendations that others take the time to watch.
Below is a sampling of the comments found or received by IMS…
“The video you made was GREAT!…I’ve made a video with you guys in it to promote your work.”
YouTube User: HighImpactFlix
“Great work! Independent journalism is the only journalism. Thank-you for helping us understand reality in this lifetime.”
YouTube User: David Gordon
“i am sharing now………..i will do my part, world, how bout you?”
Beforeitsnews.com commenter: truthlovingsoul
“It’s truly a great video! Very informative!!!… Well worth the time to watch!”
Lunaticoutpost.com commenter: LoP Guest
“Great job! I actually learned a thing or two. I’ll do what I can to get it out for you…here’s to viral status”
Vimeo User: SusanL
“Great video and i am so relieved this event is being looked into by so many talented people…”
Vimeo User: Stuart Heathcote
“HOLY MOLY! Who gets the Nobel prize for investigative journalism? Now THAT’S what the truth looks/sounds like. Many thanks!”
Vimeo User: Ron Trinny
“Thank you very much. I have forwarded your website and Vimeo link to my family members and will continue to promote your work at every possible opportunity, because, yes, we do need to talk about Sandy Hook.”
Received through Web Form: Anonymous
“Thank you for your incredible work exposing the Defrauding of the American people,”
Received through Web Form: Anonymous
“Keep doing what you’re doing. Thank you for your time and effort.”
Received though Web Form: Anonymous
The list above would be dozens of pages long if you were to compile all the supportive comments. It’s fair to say the response was generally positive, despite some negative assessments. But, in another example of how this whole phenomenon is different, the documentary found its way into the Internet Movie Database. That, in itself is unusual for videos produced as non-commercial ventures that didn’t receive wide release. Again, the views of those discovering the documentary through IMDB are highly favorable. At the time of this writing, 81 IMDB users have rated the video and the overall rating is a 9.5.
It doesn’t require re-printing the entirety of the eight reviews of the video to get a clear impression of the reviewer’s opinion. Just take a look at the review titles alone…
Worth the time. Amazing.
Very well prepared.
A Oscar worthy documentary that will change everything
Well done
Paradigm shifting
A must see!!!!!
Excellent documentary! 10 star
The Smoking Gun of Sandy Hook Research
View the complete reviews on IMDB…
Some will argue that the phenomenon of numerous people uploading portions of or all of the video was born entirely from the early reports that it had been taken down. The perception this led to was that the material in the video was explosive and that taking it down stood as another example of an attack on free speech. They will likely cite the spreading news of the many other video take-downs as only supporting their theory that all the uploading was in response to this.
There’s little doubt that this partly accounts for motivating this mass upload, but it simply doesn’t make sense that it accounts for it all. Fundamentally, a video is uploaded to a user’s channel with the expectation that at least some people will view it. Popular YouTube channels that regularly see thousands of views of any video uploaded to their channel would expect similar results from this video. But, the channels where videos barely garnered any views and had few or no subscribers wouldn’t expect so many viewers. Some of these less-trafficked channels broke up the video into as many as 15 or more parts. So, when a couple days had been spent uploading the first half as only a handful of viewers took notice, it was clear their channel wasn’t going to receive much traffic. Yet they diligently uploaded the remaining parts.
Simply put, never before has such a mass upload occurred on YouTube. It’s astonishing to see. As IMS isn’t aware of a method to track exactly how many copies of the video were uploaded before being taken down, the true number may be impossible to know. What is apparent is that comments from users on various channels and comment threads indicate that they too had uploaded the video and had it taken down. IMS is making efforts to record the account names and titles of copies of the video still available on YouTube. But, the take-downs are occurring at about the same rate as the new copies that are uploaded in response.
The Coordinated Efforts to Eliminate this Video and the Greater War on Free Speech
I’ve made reference to the various incidents of copyright claims being made against the documentary appearing on the official IMS YouTube channel and many others. These incidents, however aren’t limited to the actual documentary itself. It has been discovered that, likely in response to this mass upload event they’ve upped the ante.
Dutchsinse
Well known YouTube user, blogger and activist Dutchsinse has a very compelling story to tell involving his copy of the documentary being taken down, videos that merely report on the take-down phenomenon being taken down and even efforts by YouTube and other social media outlets to limit his ability to communicate with his fan base. Dutchsinse is no stranger to difficulties with YouTube and other social media portals, having had his account shut down 6 times in 4 years. Each time his account was shut down it was as a direct result of false copyright claims. In each case, he fought the claim and his account was restored.
Not only was Dutchsinse in the sights of those who falsely file claims of copyright infringement, he’s also been the victim of anonymous claims that he is an imposter. This actually led to his story being covered in grotesque detail on Nasdaq.com and other main-stream sites. In short, when an anonymous individual flagged his unwanted and unused Google+ account which happened to be connected to his popular YouTube account, it resulted in the interconnected accounts being taken offline. The 800 videos and his 75,000 subscribers just disappeared and no mechanism existed for him to refute the false claim.
Only because he had a connection inside Google was his issue raised with the proper departments, resulting in his YouTube account being restored. However, his access to the Google+ account tied to the YouTube account was not restored requiring he go through an identity verification process. Surprisingly, this was still deemed necessary despite the fact that his account was under the name Dutchsinse, not his real name Michael Janitch. The passport he used as the photo ID required by Google didn’t contain a reference to this pseudonym, and the processes in place seemed insufficient to reconcile this.
If not standing as an example of a serious campaign to harass Dutchsinse, then certainly standing as evidence of the unfair policies of Googe/YouTube he was forced to comply with this identity verification process 6 times. In each case, the anonymous person making the claim wasn’t required to identify themselves or provide any contact information.
The HONR Network Website
When Dutchsinse recently produced a video in which he merely describes how his copy of the documentary was given a strike by Lenny Pozner of the HONR Network, that video too was given a strike and taken down. But, this time there was something different about the claim and something that should be very concerning to anyone hoping to keep the Internet a home for free speech. Unlike other copyright or privacy claims he had received, this one didn’t allow him to dispute it. When he clicked on what had formerly led him to the copyright claims dispute form, there was a message instead that read simply… “This video is not eligible for a counter-notification.”
Video not eligible for counter-notification.
As Dutchsinse explains in an article on his blog, “The fact that I cannot dispute this means that even though I committed no crime, I have been deemed guilty by the person accusing me of the crime. I now have to get a lawyer and sue to have this accusation of a crime removed”.
CW Wade
It’s known who is doing the targeting of certain online content, in Dutchsinse’s case and in the case of IMS and others. But it isn’t only Lenny Pozner and the HONR network that’s working hard to oppose the efforts of IMS and others to speak freely about the Sandy Hook event. Take, for example one CW Wade. Wade began to appear first through his YouTube channel, Wadesvids. His very first video was a lengthy analysis of the official report in which he attempted to reconcile as many of the anomalies discovered by independent researchers with the official report. From there, he graduated to appearing on radio shows and podcasts where his position as a supporter of the official account of events was cemented.
Over the following months CW Wade began to establish a number of online blogs which he has devoted to the singular topic of Sandy Hook “hoaxers” and “stalkers.” Through first one and now a handful of blogs, he slanders many people researching Sandy Hook with an obvious proclivity to bend the words he uses to better portray his subjects as “stalkers.”
One example is an article in which he accuses one researcher of soliciting the help of another, whereby he claims they put a “…stalking hit…” on someone related to the Sandy Hook event. I’ve heard examples of stalking, but this is truly the first time I’ve heard that one stalker may have asked someone else to stalk on their behalf. It’s clear that CW Wade’s intent is to do as much damage as he can to people questioning Sandy Hook. The answer to whether anyone in the IMS group knows who CW Wade is working for isn’t being revealed.
In a bold move that only leads people to further suspect deception, Wade published another blog that this time he acquired a domain name for. The reason why a proprietary domain name was a requirement in this case was that it was needed to create the impression of being a regional news site. Writing articles now for the “Newtown Post-Examiner,” Wade appears to be making an attempt to pose as a writer working for a non-biased news organization. The strategy appears to be paying off to some degree. A few news stories on the web cite quotes from the Newtown Post-Examiner. They don’t bother to clarify that it’s a blog and likely doesn’t employ an editorial review process.
Incidents of this online persona slandering people who produce content questioning the Sandy Hook event is not only impacting the individuals but, by association anyone in the growing community of those who question the event. Making these acts even more sinister is the possibility that they are part of a coordinated effort working with other groups, one of which was mentioned previously.
Cease and Desist
When one member of IMS had received two copyright strikes made by Lenny Pozner resulting in two videos being taken offline, he noted something CW Wade said in one of only two exchanges they had with each other. Only the member and the claimant, Lenny Pozner knew that they had been saddled with two copyright strikes. In closing a comment made to the member, CW Wade asked, “How many strikes is that now?” Without explaining exactly how, the comment made it clear that CW Wade received this information from Lenny Pozner. It’s likely that CW Wade didn’t wish to make this fact known. It doesn’t seem all that far-fetched considering that Wade has allowed his blogs to be used as a pulpit by Lenny.
The relationship between Lenny Pozner and the HONR Network has been well established. In what is unlikely to be a simple case of showing appreciation for having shared values, CW Wade openly supports the HONR Network which has even been the subject of articles by Wade. Because Lenny Pozner is engaged in making false and illegal claims against members of IMS and their supporters, and CW Wade has made numerous statements that slander IMS members as well as others, they are engaging in a criminal conspiracy. CW Wade has openly called for IMS members to be the targets of law enforcement actions, claimed that they are lying to their respective subscribers and that it’s just a matter of time before they WILL commit acts of violence. IMS requests that these claims be examined carefully. They state that not a single shred of evidence exists to support them and that, to view them individually isn’t likely to reveal Wade’s true intent. But, to view them within the context of Wade’s single-minded body of work shows clearly his intent to manipulate public opinion of those who dare to question officialdom.
What’s in a Name and Why it’s a Very Serious Matter
PerjuryIt is an act of perjury to file a claim of copyright infringement via YouTube using anything but your legal name. An alias may not be used when filing these claims. It is through the work of IMS members beginning before their documentary project even began that many now suspect “Lenny Pozner”is not the actual name of the person presenting himself using that name.
One very simple technique by which the average person may see evidence of this is to conduct a search of any number of public records databases, such as Radaris. Searching “Lenny Pozner” may, depending upon the system being queried result in a match for a person in Connecticut. On Radaris, for example a result for “Leonard P Osner” can be seen in Newtown CT. Researchers who have looked into the matter of Lenny’s true identity have cross-referenced the data available through both public and commercial sources and determined that “Leonard P Osner” is almost certainly an identity used by Lenny Pozner.
With that name in Radaris are associated aliases. They include “Enta C Pozner, Len Pozner, Lenny Pozner, Leonard Posner, Leonard Pozner and Eliezer Pozner”; six in total. How many aliases do you have? The more appropriate question in this case is, how many aliases are connected to your identity? My age is close to that of Lenny’s. I checked to see in Radaris how many aliases I was shown to have. I have one alias, which is a simple misspelling of my name with the last character of my middle name missing. Likely this was the result of an input error. If, however, Lenny’s actual legal middle initial and last name is “P. Osner” the fact that he’s credited for his editorials and has established a family under the last name “Pozner” is no simple clerical error.
Radaris results
Evidence is said to be in possession of IMS members indicating that Lenny has committed numerous acts of federal fraud by providing affidavits using names other than his legal name. This is not just a case of whether there was intent to defraud. It’s a simple requirement of certain documents. If the person who has filed no less than dozens of copyright claims on YouTube using the name Lenny Pozner has a different legal name, then this is a clear case of perjury, as YouTube specifies that they require the claimant’s sworn oath.
As IMS has been forced to deal with what are likely illegal attempts to disrupt dissemination of their new documentary, the plight of their supporters has become a concern as well. Not that the people who took it upon themselves to upload a copy of the video and been subject to its removal have been taking it sitting down. Many have been quite vocal in expressing their dissatisfaction with how easily the system allows for their videos to be taken offline. In one sense, YouTube is being exploited for this purpose. However, it’s YouTube’s lopsided system, favoring the claimant that doesn’t prevent and even facilitates the fraud.
IMS has determined that the best course of action to remedy the conditions that are impacting their supporters is to provide a detailed report of the problem to YouTube. As stated, YouTube is both being defrauded by these illegal claims and are themselves employing a system that facilitates it. There seems no party better situated to resolve the matter than YouTube themselves. The support mechanisms available to YouTube users are tailored for copyright owners making claims of infringement. Although there are mechanisms for some other scenarios, there simply isn’t anything amongst their standard support means suitable for reporting the situation IMS and their fellow YouTube users are in. Therefore, IMS is considering their options as it’s in the best interest of everyone concerned to report this activity in the most expedient way possible.
At present, IMS doesn’t know of any way to obtain a comprehensive list of YouTube videos taken offline through unwarranted and illegal copyright claims. That may require an in-depth and lengthy search effort. This should give you an idea of the numbers of users that could have potentially been impacted just in relation to the IMS documentary. Presented below are just the first 125 accounts that have uploaded the video to their respective channels…
Documentary Video Uploaders
documentaire Angel White Aaron Schuett
AnarchyWorld Jessica Morgan B3LI3V3R 1- FREEDOM FOR ALL
Kieran T ZeeRoeThree rorscharch5380
Jack Larson Hans Fuchs Stop Obooma
Qadosh Stephanos theunimaginables Kons Piracy
Jenn Openyoureyes The Vigilant Christian Paul Williams
houseoflogic1969 Overdose Denver SloppyCatProductions
Tatoott1009Reloaded 2 MIN NEWS tatoott1009 2 MIN NEWS xatisis
Skid Davidson a Voice Crying in the Wilderness grat mccall Useless Eater
psyopdestroyer druid189189 Eddie Rodrigues
Unorganised Confusion lee lee Richard Rowell
AnarchyWorld BIGBABYZIP Kevin Wright
jstark551 Miss Island Spice alex blazquez
Vigilant Guardian radroofer HighImpactFlix
dmonat truth4wtc7 Dwaven Gully
?????? (Documentary) Kieran T Anthony Barrea
Exposing The Big Three Scott Anthony xxxDemonDavexxx
YORAKHUNT Coy Calderon Red Angel
Lunos Pariah TheGronkeyKong stertim
B1GDADDYDUNK UNLIMITED 57freak57 John Lee
santiagovalecallampa Christopher Yates Global Agenda
Taylor French Run2Christ {R2C} Bore Hog
SpreadingTruth Georgette Washington Kevo Palapala
13andsim Daniel Wierzbicki 1933Truth
tomtomandt John Mutch VeritasPress
Truth Seeker Free Mind Revolution Mole Nopoly
Vick Nash macek677 ST3ADYxKICKS
Reversed News TheFubar1066 TheWindjunkie
garuchillajoe Vick Nash KJV Only
Em Bean dextro org DITRH
Widiar Adam LeeBerty Free Thinker
Gary orGibby Bill Owens OFC Go F Yourself
peekay22 Wilson Phillips Fred Dagg
Keylontic Science The Knowing 101 Dicegirl72
ARMWORTH100 Leah-fathoms-stars Tom Goffnett
An Ony MattyD 4TruthAlt Beloki Memorial
DIGIVOXJ23 Joe Piscapo lavzee lavzee
Craig French Jeff Curtis silver palomino
Lee Beezy lucidmoment71 Wakulasan
MaximDaBoss ECKIEL JOSSER MANIN THESTREET
Timmy Richardson Amanda Saor Alba Lv4music1
Aussieinthefight franco3830
The above list is in no way comprehensive. It lists only the first 125 uploaders. IMS will continue to record the account names of uploaders in a master list for future reference. Everyone’s efforts will not be forgotten.
The Future Remains Uncertain but One in Which We Might Speak Freely
There are definitely stories emerging from a simple, yet unprecedented act. Regular people came together to share their individual contributions in research of the Sandy Hook event. In addition to the sensible presentation of the information, people seem to appreciate that those presenting it are personally motivated to give of their time and energy without being paid to do so. Maybe this is why harsher criticisms of the amateur effort are set aside in favor of giving thanks.
There is mounting evidence that this controversial documentary is the target of a coordinated effort to prevent it from being seen. Because of this, the very people who appreciate the work of its producers found an opportunity to help by uploading the video themselves. In so doing, they’ve joined with IMS in solidarity; in sharing their goal of achieving full disclosure. Others who watched as people came to IMS’s aid, helping ensure their documentary would be seen were touched by the display and decided to join in.
It’s unclear how long this phenomenon will continue. We can’t know for sure how far the opposition will go to disrupt it. More interestingly, we don’t yet know what other twist will develop out of all this. One thing that it calls to mind is that the Sandy Hook matter appears far from being concluded. For so many people to express their thanks, there must be far more conspiracy theorists out there than traditional media would have us believe. For still more people to go to such great length to help the video get seen, there may be a bright future in which we’re free to speak our minds in store for us after all.
Please direct questions or requests to the IMS group: staff@mediasolidarity.com
Independent Media Solidarity on the Web
Official Website: http://mediasolidarity.com/
Watch the Full Documentary: http://mediasolidarity.com/watch_video.html
IMS on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheIMSMediaGroup
IMS on Twitter: https://twitter.com/IMSolidarity
IMS on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndependentMediaSolidarity
IMS Contributors to the Documentary “We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook”
jerry
14th December 2014, 19:16
Today AOL and other web based accounts are running their SH anniversary story . The comments are exposing the myth of Sandy Hook. Incredible, I find it for myself, because for these MSM web based outlets its always been the same, of just following the official narrative. I urge everyone to visit today just to see for yourself how we are winning this battle for the truth. If you feel up to a comment or two that would be a great contribution as well.
jerry
14th December 2014, 19:39
UPDATE AOL JUST TOOK THEIR HEADLINE STORY DOWN! WOW! I just posted about how Aol ran their anniversary Sandy Hook story today, and the comment section was filled with people talking about how big a hoax it was . I just returned to check the comments out some more and find they removed the story , their headliner for today taken down.
UPDATE TO MY UPDATE looks as though its back up just not their headliner any more.
jerry
14th December 2014, 20:10
SAME ON YAHOO no anniversary story to be found ?
jerry
15th December 2014, 18:35
Excellent article here friends, that succinctly ties the evidence and lack thereof neatly together as a quick easy review for all those who are so pressed for time, that they completely avoid the issue. No excuses here please. A MUST SEE
The Sandy Hook Hoax: How we know it didn’t happen
The absence of evidence that should be present and the presence of evidence that should be absent are keys to unraveling Sandy Hook. And the suppression of the new documentary, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, appears to be backfiring. Proof of fraud and fakery continues to mount, substantiating it was a drill and no children died
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/14/the-sandy-hook-hoax-how-we-know-it-didnt-happen/
Curious77
17th December 2014, 05:32
jerry --
Yes, Mae Brussel is (was) quite brilliant --
I'll see if I can find the link to her Chas. Manson as an unlikely hippie" and her deciphering of what actually happened in the Sharon Tate murders.
EDIT: There is a simpler version of this which would help Mae Brussel beginners,
but at the moment this is all I could find. Go down a bit to this paragraph which
will get you into the article --
I knew in the summer of '67—this was the spring when it was happening—that something very big in the United States was coming to ahead. Because I live in the Peninsula here; I'm close to a movement that was growing. Going back and forth from San Francisco to Big Sur, spending my summers at Sur, I could see something really good in a true Judao-Christian tradition of people making it, sharing their housing, sharing their food, rapping. I realized that in this country we had a revolution. There was a revolution of hair-style, clothing, cosmetics, transportation, housing, value system, churches—there was an economic revolution. It effected the cosmetic industry, canned foods, grocery revolution, dietary habits, dwellings, the use of land. No longer needing dwellings; meeting outdoors, no high rent for each separate family; sharing one place. People were delivering their own babies instead of spending $250 for the obstetrician. They were recycling old clothes; going to the Good Will, making their own things, wearing burlap, sharing, doing without, withdrawing from spectator sports or amusements; they weren't sitting and watching people throw a pigskin ball back and forth.
http://www.maebrussell.com/Transcriptions/16.html
This is the time for talking about Sandy Hook . . .
Let's remember there is no such thing as a perfect crime.
And that they have always depended on cover-ups.
.
.
jerry
18th December 2014, 01:25
jerry --
Yes, Mae Brussel is (was) quite brilliant --
I'll see if I can find the link to her Chas. Manson as an unlikely hippie" and her deciphering of what actually happened in the Sharon Tate murders.
EDIT: There is a simpler version of this which would help Mae Brussel beginners,
but at the moment this is all I could find. Go down a bit to this paragraph which
will get you into the article --
I knew in the summer of '67—this was the spring when it was happening—that something very big in the United States was coming to ahead. Because I live in the Peninsula here; I'm close to a movement that was growing. Going back and forth from San Francisco to Big Sur, spending my summers at Sur, I could see something really good in a true Judao-Christian tradition of people making it, sharing their housing, sharing their food, rapping. I realized that in this country we had a revolution. There was a revolution of hair-style, clothing, cosmetics, transportation, housing, value system, churches—there was an economic revolution. It effected the cosmetic industry, canned foods, grocery revolution, dietary habits, dwellings, the use of land. No longer needing dwellings; meeting outdoors, no high rent for each separate family; sharing one place. People were delivering their own babies instead of spending $250 for the obstetrician. They were recycling old clothes; going to the Good Will, making their own things, wearing burlap, sharing, doing without, withdrawing from spectator sports or amusements; they weren't sitting and watching people throw a pigskin ball back and forth.
http://www.maebrussell.com/Transcriptions/16.html
This is the time for talking about Sandy Hook . . .
Let's remember there is no such thing as a perfect crime.
And that they have always depended on cover-ups.
.
.
I agree 110 % that this needs discussed debated and shown to everyone. It never fails to amaze me how everyone just don't want to hear it or talk about it. TPTB have mind washed everyone so thoroughly that its such a taboo subject , as aliens running the Whitehouse. Many consider anyone batsh!t crazy who dare talk about conspiracies. The paradigm is changing as more and more become aware. TPTB have definitely step up their game and all of us who are aware need to step up ours. MLK " those who know and do not speak to the evil and tyranny are as guilty as those who perpetrate it .
Just as Eric Holder disclosed their game plan , that they have to be repetitive, and need to do it every day of the week to just really brainwash people
Curious77
21st December 2014, 07:58
There's a lot to fear.
When you're taught from kindergarden that capitalism is synonymous with democracy --
That our ideals are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness --
No one mentions that our Constitution is schizophrenic --
All of this garbage is repeated over and over --
If you hear a counter argument, you will hear it once.
There was only one brief moment of honesty on TV -- the days of Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy,
James Baldwin, Martin Luther King, Jr. -- where true challenge was offered.
Later succeeded by PBS's Bill Buckley/CIA truths!
The 1960's "revolution" was non-violent, but it was met with violence in every area.
We all want revolutionary change -- Egyptians have tried it, Libyans, Syria ---
Only to see Mubarak freed. US having more control over these areas -- "boots on the ground."
The only way the RW can rise and continue to hold power is by violence -- that is forever true.
IMO, that's why we've seen torture reintroduced by US -- it's the only way a
dictatorship can rise and hold power.
I think it's why the US showed how they were holding terrorist suspects . . .
in bright red jumsuits -- hooded, gloved, goggled, shackled, kneeling and under total control -- despite the criticism of the US which resulted -- because I don't think those images of those prisoners can ever be erased from our minds.
Anyone who thinks about real revolution (war) also thinks about ways to leave the war zone.
That's the first thing that happens -- people want to leave.
It's fear -- and it's that tendency to be fearful which gives the RW the ability to control us.
.
I agree 110 % that this needs discussed debated and shown to everyone. It never fails to amaze me how everyone just don't want to hear it or talk about it. TPTB have mind washed everyone so thoroughly that its such a taboo subject , as aliens running the Whitehouse. Many consider anyone batsh!t crazy who dare talk about conspiracies. The paradigm is changing as more and more become aware. TPTB have definitely step up their game and all of us who are aware need to step up ours. MLK " those who know and do not speak to the evil and tyranny are as guilty as those who perpetrate it .
Just as Eric Holder disclosed their game plan , that they have to be repetitive, and need to do it every day of the week to just really brainwash people
jerry
22nd December 2014, 03:02
The fear that controls us is real and a huge hurdle. Its hard to express yourself knowing what is going on and declaring "I'm not scared" Accepting and facing that fear is when one breaks free and becomes able to speak the unspeakable. I have slowly gotten a few acquaintances to open their eyes to what is happening and they now continue to ask me my thoughts on many of the current events of the day. I do what I can and its never enough. I have family that still will not accept all that is happening even though they admit many things I have awoken them to is real. They shy away and I really don't blame them. I have one daughter who fears that viewing such conspiracies on the internet they will come to take her away and I have to say she's most likely correct in that assumption, as this is the fear they are entraining repeatedly daily, hour after hour . Were watching you beware. Their plan is working and so many do fear this police surveillance state that's growing leaps and bounds. It boggles the mind when one realizes that what they have accomplished since 911 would make Hitler blush like a school girl, and the truth be known is that the general public is incapable of an awakening to the degree many have who frequent PA
Curious77
22nd December 2014, 05:59
Too many ways now to track posters across the internet --
Google, Disqus, Yahoo --
But you would probably still find someone who would say ...
"Well, if you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything
to worry about." Right ...?
Coming back to Sandy Hook, while it might be one of their most
vulnerable "events" .... it remains a rather nasty and ugly one.
Happy Winter Solstice -- !!
jerry
22nd December 2014, 22:27
Well I'm a proud to be on the list with you Curious....:)
jerry
27th December 2014, 19:51
Jim has put things together fairly well in this broadcast, I know how much work he did to simply gather together the research of so many different people and then present that coherently.
KPt6UNUAZqM
thepainterdoug
27th December 2014, 21:05
jim fetzers presentation is excellent. i have studied this "incident" inside out for well over a year now and I am convinced it was a staged event.
jerry
28th December 2014, 01:31
I hope and pray that sooner or later one of these dominos fall then the critical mass will have no choice but to awaken.
Lawsuit Could Reveal Truth About Sandy Hook Massacre
kK8CnIBA928
turiya
30th December 2014, 02:39
AGAIN VIDEO RE-POSTED
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ABKrvYXRak
turiya
jerry
30th December 2014, 03:32
I've found that no matter how many times they take it down some ones already reposted it on u-tube but you need to use the exact title to find it, and Bill has uploaded it to Avalon so I believe they cant get to it here.
turiya
30th December 2014, 14:07
FBI Says Nobody Killed at Sandy Hook Massacre
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1RlzXvGy2s
Sandy Hook Film Censorship Efforts Backfire
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T8_WYzH5SM
turiya
turiya
30th December 2014, 20:00
Filmmaker and Author William Brandon Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 Trillion Against Big Media Over Sandy Hook Massacre Coverage (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/12/26/filmmaker-author-sues-big-media-over-sandy-hook/)
Filmmaker and Author William Brandon Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 Trillion Against Big Media Over Sandy Hook Massacre Coverage
Here is Mr. Shanley’s Statement:
"After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqcaaE6aFX8 — Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”
Attached is a photo staged by the Newtown Bee, a wider view of that action being staged on a different day that the emergency altogether, and a sampling of front pages that terrorized the world with the fake photo.
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/evacuationnewtownsandyhook.jpg
Mr. Shanley is the producer of The Made-for-TV Election starring Martin Sheen (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeJxuOVXEm8) that analyzed media coverage in the tectonic Carter-Reagan election of 1980. He is also the author of books on quantum physics, including Alice and the Quantum Cat (2011).
Dr. James Fetzer, whose 35 articles on Sandy Hook for Veteran’s Today qualify him for the highest investigative journalism awards, and School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig, whose investigative expertise as a former Florida State Police officer, and loving attention as a former principal, makes this case’s particulars comprehensible to all, will be called as expert witnesses.
It is their scholarship and bravery that makes these Complaints possible for the shear breadth and scope and detail of evidence they have assembled. Hundreds of independent researchers have also made this day possible, and Mr. Shanley claims they will be tracked down and rewarded heartily for their bravery and mindfulness of America.
Mr. Shanley’s Complaint states, in part:
Defendants entered in a multi-year conspiracy, meeting in groups separately and together, to commit fraud and terrorism, i.e., to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the “Sandy Hook Massacre” was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA National Level Exercise Event that redirected government resources to terrorize the public. These crimes were undertaken with the intent of subverting the US Constitution and to affect national, state and local laws. This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts, and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions.
The true costs of this breach of integrity and trust to society are unfathomable. Instead of fulfilling their Constitutional Role as the People’s Surrogates and being honest brokers of information, the Plaintiff will show how the men and women who dominate the TV news industry in the United States broke laws, besmirched the First Amendment, their Constitutional role as government watchdogs, and forfeited the right to report the news, and thereby profit from news production and distribution. The sine qua non of journalism is the search for truth. Our Fourth Estate chose a different path. Punitive damages of one year’s annual revenue from each Defendant are being sought to establish a News Trust, that will free journalism and restore trust and integrity to our communications sources. A democracy cannot survive this tyranny over human consciousness.
The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion usd, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint.
Case Name: Shanley v. Smith et al
Case Number: 3:14-cv-01881-JAM (https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106786)
Filer: William Brandon Shanley
Mass TV and wire service news media are being sued for 1 trillion usd, punitive damages.
Shanley v. O’Prey et al
Case Number: 3:14-cv-01929-JAM (https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?106879)
Filer: William Brandon Shanley
A third lawsuit will be filed against Connecticut-based TV and print media soon.
As Mr. Shanley is proceeding on a pro se en paupers basis, public support is welcome via PayPal to wbs2012@zoho.com (wbs2012@zoho.com <wbs2012@zoho.com>).
A complete list of Defendants in this suit can be found below:
Defendants:
Chairman and President
Obsidian Analysis
1776 Eye St NW 4th Floor
Washington DC 20006
John Miller
Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence & Counter-terrorism,
New York City Police Department
1 Police Plaza, New York, NY 10038
(John Miller is formerly of CBS NEWS)
Brian L. Roberts
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Comcast Corporation
Comcast Center
1701 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(Comcast purchased NBC-Universal from GE in March 2013. NBC has eleven owned-and-operated stations and nearly 200 affiliates in the United States)
Deborah Turness
President NBC News
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Phil Griffin
President
MSNBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Rupert Murdoch
Chairman and CEO
21st Century Fox
1211 Avenue of the Americas,
New York, New York 10036
Rupert Murdoch
Executive Chairman
News Corporation
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Roger Ailes
President
Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Robert Iger
Chairman and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91521
Ann Sweeney
Disney-ABC Television Group
77 West 66th Street,
New York, New York 10023
(Disney Media Includes 8 owned and operated stations and almost 200 affiliates)
James Goldston
President ABC News
77 West 66th Street,
New York, New York 10023
John Skipper
President
ESPN
ESPN Plaza
935 Middle Street
Bristol, C 06010
Les Moonves
President and CEO
CBS Corp
CBS Headquarters
51 W. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6188
Peter Dunn
President
CBS Television Stations
CBS Corp
CBS Headquarters
51 W. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6188
(CBS Station Group consists of 29 owned-and-operated stations, including 16 that are part of the CBS Television Network, eight affiliates of The CW Network, three independent stations and two MyNetworkTV affiliates.)
David Rhodes
President
CBS News
CBS Headquarters
51 W. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6188
Jeff Fager
Executive Producer
60 Minutes
CBS News
CBS Headquarters
51 W. 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6188
Sumner M. Redstone
Executive Chairman of the Board and Founder
Viacom
1515 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
Doug Herzog
President
MTV Networks Group
1515 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
Robert D. Marcus
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Time-Warner
The Shops at Columbus Circle, 1 Time Warner Ctr.
New York, NY 10019
Jeff Zucker
President
CNN
Time-Warner
The Shops at Columbus Circle, 1 Time Warner Ctr.
New York, NY 10019
Anderson Cooper
TV Host
CNN
Time-Warner
The Shops at Columbus Circle, 1 Time Warner Ctr.
New York, NY 10019
General Electric Company
Jeffrey R. Immelt
3135 Easton Turnpike
Fairfield, CT 06828
(GE owned NBC-Universal until March 2013)
James C. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer
Thomson Reuters
3 Times Square
New York, NY 10036
Nicholas Chiaia
President
United Press International, Inc.
1133 19th Street Northwest #9
Washington, DC 20036
Tony Hall, Baron Hall of Birkenhead
16th director general
British Broadcasting Corporation, Inc.
c/o BBC Worldwide America
1120 Avenue of the Americas
5th Floor
New York, NY 10036-6700
Michael Bloomberg
President and CEO
Bloomberg, LP
731 Lexington Ave
New York, NY 10022
Daniel L. Doctoroff
President & CEO
Bloomberg News
731 Lexington Ave
New York City, NY 10022
Paula A. Kerger,
President & CEO
Public Broadcasting Service
Crystal City Shops, 2100 Crystal Drive
Arlington, VA 22202
Linda Winslow
Executive Producer
The Newshour
WETA
3939 Campbell Avenue
Arlington, VA 22206
Jon Abbott
President & CEO
WGBH-TV
WGBH Educational Foundation
1 Guest Street Brighton, MA 02135
David Fanning
Executive Producer
FRONTLINE
WGBH-TV
WGBH Educational Foundation
1 Guest Street Brighton, MA 02135
Ken Druckerman
Executive Producer
Left/Right Docs
39 West 19th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
Banks Tarver
Executive Producer
Left/Right Docs
39 West 19th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
Frank Koughan
Producer
Left/Right Docs
39 West 19th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
Joe Beshenkovsky
Co-Producer and Editor
Left/Right Docs
39 West 19th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
John Marks
Writer
Left/Right Docs
39 West 19th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
Richard Graziano
Publisher
The Hartford Courant
285 Broad Street
Hartford, CT 06115
Andrew Julien
Editor
The Hartford Courant
285 Broad Street
Hartford, CT 06115
-end-
Slorri
6th January 2015, 19:09
I suppose that many of you have already noticed that they are re-using photos from Sandy Hook in Peshawar.
BBC Admits Peshawar Victim Photo is alleged Sandy Hook Victim Noah Pozner
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/01/bbc-admits-peshawar-victim-photo-noah-pozner-alleged-killed-sandy-hook/#ZjdCdozPcowTLpoU.99
turiya
8th January 2015, 15:51
From the Caravan to Midnight Wolfgang Halbig interview:
(January 7, 2015)
http://curezone.com/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/CARAVAN2/EPISODE204_WOLFGANG_HALBIG_excerpt.mp3
http://learnandgrowtv.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/go-button2.jpg?w=150&h=150
(CLICK to LISTEN) (http://curezone.com/upload/_T_Forums/Turiya_Files_/CARAVAN2/EPISODE204_WOLFGANG_HALBIG_excerpt.mp3)
Wolfgang Halbig: As you know, they’ve been doing everything they can – the Sandy Hook Defense Group – whoever they may be, they’ve shut down my gold fundraising site to help me pay for the legal expenses in trying to investigate Sandy Hook. So, the next thing I did, I had a Paypal account, now its being attacked. Someone’s been writing to the Florida Attorney General, calling me a fraud & saying that I’m abusing, hurting, people in Newton, Connecticut – Sandy Hook, I’m being offensive towards the parents.
So what I did, I said, “You know what, I’m going to do a Florida FOIA.” And you know, within 15 days I got a response. I know who the person is who is trying to criticize me & get my fund raising campaign taken down.
John B: Really.
Wolfgang Halbig: Its Lenny Pozner – supposedly, a parent of a child who died at Sandy Hook. Now this is the same Lenny Pozer who’s son, Noah… and god, I hope I’m wrong, but here’s the same Lenny Pozner who’s son is on the wall in Pakistan…
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/s480x480/10177901_861996140519478_3910266738818182897_n.jpg ?oh=0c1673c80efa4b668b7207260f7437e1&oe=553ECA79&__gda__=1430552649_fcaffb92b89af3eda56c487b6061a01 5
John B: Yeah!
Wolfgang Halbig: The children who died in Pakistan & underneath his picture, he’s got a Pakistani name [Huzaifa Huxaifa]. How did he… I have yet to figure that out. How does that all work?
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Lenny-Pozner.jpg
Lenny Pozner
NOAH POZNER = HUZAIFA HUXAIFA
TWO DEATHS ONE KID
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3J0JoIImA8
turiya
turiya
27th January 2015, 01:40
Destroying Evidence: Newtown City Council Votes
To Demolish "Sandy Hook Shooter's Home"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr1eSuxBDnU
turiya
27th January 2015, 02:01
William Shanley Discusses $1 Trillion Lawsuit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64ufNpijIx0
December 30, 2014
On this joint edition of Real Politik and The Real Deal Connecticut-based author and filmmaker William Shanley speaks with James Fetzer and James Tracy on his trillion dollar lawsuit against big media for fraud and terrorism of the public via their reportage on the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre event. Shanley maintains that the alleged shooting was a FEMA-orchestrated drill deviously presented by major wire services, newspapers, and broadcast and cable networks as an genuine tragedy.
Interview Highlights
Shanley became involved in researching Sandy Hook while producing a film he continues to work on. He then viewed Sofia Smallstorm’s presentation, Unraveling Sandy Hook in Two, Three, Four and Five Dimensions and read several articles on Sandy Hook written by Professor Fetzer. “When I heard that Michael Bellmore, the 28-year-old former New Haven Register reporter had died for unexplained reasons I saw myself as a 28-year-old kid in radio and working for Jimmy Carter with sound equipment, and I just thought of this kid. I said, ‘This is something I can do. I’m going to go to the mat on this.'”
After further delving into the work of independent Sandy Hook researchers Shanley marveled, “The evidence is just overwhelming.” He then began to plea through traditional channels by
writing a series of letters. First of all, I wrote to [Connecticut] Governor Malloy, informing him of my background and association with Dr. Fetzer and other scholars. I started writing all the politicians with the best writing I could come up with and I was astonished [to receive no response] from the Governor, the Secretary of State. I’ve written to everyone in the legislature a number of times; the Sandy Hook Commission a number of times. I’ve written to the President twice. I’ve written to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees calling for joint hearings. There’s been no response from anyone to any communication. It’s been a complete blackout. This is like Moscow 1952.
Shanley asserts that reporters have been caught running flagrant propaganda on the Sandy Hook massacre, and that this speaks to larger concerns, such as today’s news media being run by conglomerates that care very little about actual journalism.
We have to look at the fact that the news budgets over the past 20 years have been savaged. The salaries of reporters are very low. $30,000 is the average salary for a reporter in the state of Connecticut. My mother was a newspaper reporter for the Waterbury Republican in Connecticut. They covered these little towns in Connecticut like vacuum cleaners. [Reporters] went to every town meeting, every city council meeting, every finance meeting, every environmental meeting, and it all got reported. That’s all disappeared in America with the conglomeration and the international media companies, all of whom are responsible.
Imagine Disney, which sells products to children, now being a marketer of terrorism. How can that brand ever withstand this? This is how I know these captains who are running these corporations, this little news division is just another division of their big company. That’s why they’re involved in business with the government.
They’re the people’s stand ins. They’re surrogates for us who cannot be there. They’re our voices and our ears and eyes. And they’ve chosen to besmirch their role as upholders of the sacred trust of truth in journalism, and sell out to do business with the government.
Shanley observes how the Newtown area’s background of psychiatry and occultism may be related to the Sandy Hook event and other unusual practices by Connecticut state officials. In 1997, for example, the Office of the Child’s Advocate was established to obscure the unusual and unreported deaths of 66 children in state institutions. The same agency is presently advocating a policy that will likely culminate in federally-mandated mental health screenings from infancy to young adulthood.
Those in the state government are “lunatics,” Shanley asserts.
I don’t know where this strain comes from in America or in Connecticut in particular. It’s literally like living in the twilight zone here. I’ve never seen anything like it. You can cut it with a knife–the fear, the trepidation, the sickness underlying it. Now we’ve got the Connecticut State Police who are members of the Masons. They had a project for a kidnapping kit for every parent with a school child in Connecticut. [Parents were expected] to participate in this school kidnapping kit with the local community. This was a project of the Masons. I looked at the data and there were no kidnappings in Connecticut!
Shanley notes how advocacy on the Sandy Hook incident has jeopardized family and personal relationships. Indeed, last summer, shortly after receiving an odd warning concerning his research activities, his new roommate apparently committed suicide under a bizarre circumstances. The judge presiding over Shanley’s recent lawsuits against big media has also issued a protective order to aid in protecting Shanley from bodily harm.
Overview of Lawsuits
The first lawsuit is for fraud and terrorism against the Newtown Bee, the Hartford Courant, owned by Tribune media, the Associated Press, and the New York Times. None of them have responded. That’s for $10 billion–$5 billion for each count. What I’ve designed these to do is to put these companies out of business, or put us in a position to take these media industries over by requesting punitive damage equal to one year in revenue for each of the corporations.
The second lawsuit [filed on December 22, 2014] for $1 trillion–$500 billion for each count–is against Obsidian, people like John Miller of CBS who is intimately involved as Deputy National Director of Intelligence who misled many other news agencies. Anderson Cooper is in there (I put him in especially for you, James), and all of the chairmen and CEOs of all the mass media companies. We’re talking about Reuters-Thomson. We’re talking about Disney-ABC. We’re talking about General Electric, which owned NBC up until 2013. Comcast, and all these [other] mega-multinationals.
Shanley wants to use most of the proceeds to begin a news trust that will provide a new form of genuine journalism. “This will be used to free journalism forever from the tyranny of economics.”
Rather than seeking personal damages, Shanley states that his suits involve punitive damages for the media’s dubious Sandy Hook reportage.
Punitive damages are halfway between civil and criminal. They’re basically designed in cases like OJ Simpson, where they couldn’t get a conviction in a criminal trial, where the bar of evidence is lower in a civil case. As far as standing, the court has standing, because this is a violation of federal laws. I am a citizen of Connecticut and the United States. I have standing just on that basis. Any citizen can do this.
SOURCE (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/12/30/bigger-than-watergate/)
turiya
27th January 2015, 02:18
(Seems the overall view following the above interview is making Mr Shanley's pro se lawsuit a bit of a distraction for the work that Wolfgang Halbig is continuing to move on.)
$Trillion Lawsuit Plaintiff Now Missing
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/shes.jpg
Sandy Hook Elementary School
March 15, 2013. Image Credit: CTPost.com
Updated 1/16/15
By James F. Tracy
Several individuals have recently brought to the attention of MHB that Mr. Shanley was arrested on 12/31/14 on one felony and two misdemeanor charges. He is presently being held in the Corrigan- Radgowski correctional facility in Connecticut with bail set at $50,000.
http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetail.aspx?source=Pending&Key=865fff9d-2e6a-4f19-84d0-cefd877f7800
For over one week now—since December 30—William Shanley has been incommunicado, failing to respond to emails or telephone calls. Shanley is the author, onetime filmmaker and Connecticut resident who filed a $1 trillion pro se federal lawsuit against big media for fraudulent and sensationalized coverage of the December 14, 2012 shooting event at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut.
Shanley filed the suit on December 22, 2014, naming several dozen defendants. The press release announcing the action was posted on MHB December 26, 2014. A few days later, on December 28, plaintiff Shanley participated in a recorded interview with Drs. Jim Fetzer and Jim Tracy. In the interview Shanley was well-composed, explaining how he was under psychiatric care and that his roommate was killed under unusual circumstances in August 2014.
Less than one week after filing the $1 trillion lawsuit Shanley announced a global “no money system” via YouTube that he will purportedly aid in presiding over. The video is an especially bizarre mixture of ideas, imagery, and verbiage. On December 29 Shanley appeared alongside Fetzer on “The Pete Santilli Show.” (http://youtu.be/bC0F3a0AmlM)
The appearance on Santilli’s program prompted YouTube researcher Professor Doom1 (https://www.youtube.com/user/ProfessorDoom1), who has considerable familiarity with the legal process, to contact Shanley and ask for a copy of the lawsuit. Doom telephoned Shanley, asking to interview the filmmaker and send along a copy of the paperwork. When no documents were electronically received Doom telephoned Shanley again, at which time it was revealed that Shanley had incorrectly transcribed Doom’s email address. “I still never got them after I corrected the email,” Doom tells MHB.
Later that day Prof. Doom interviewed school safety expert and fellow Sandy Hook researcher Wolfgang Halbig on his views concerning Shanley’s lawsuit. Halbig condemned the action. Doom then contacted Shanley via Skype and recorded the exchange. The discussion quickly turned uncivil, with Shanley yelling several prurient remarks while attacking Halbig for his unwillingness to be involved in the suit.
(Note: Vulgar Language Useage)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-_jOut2GfE
“It seems like Shanley has a split personality,” Doom notes. “He was absolutely clear and coherent at the beginning. Then as his anger level rose and he proceeded to name calling.” The YouTuber has since removed the video from his channel, although it is available elsewhere.
Such behavior does not lend itself to success in a legal process. “How’s it going to be in a courtroom when he’s being picked and probed by very skilled lawyers?” Doom asks.
Additional information solicited from one of Doom’s Connecticut followers suggests that Shanley lives in a New London neighborhood close to casinos and where illicit drugs may be prevalent. At the same time, over the past few years many individuals involved in the Sandy Hook massacre have turned up missing or dead (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/07/10/sandy-hook-massacres-disappearing-witnesses/).
Whatever the cause of Shanley’s absence, his flights of fancy, suggested in the pro se lawsuit and curious temper tantrums are likely unhelpful for coming to terms with and addressing what took place on December 14, 2012.
SOURCE (http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/01/08/trillion-lawsuit-plaintiff-now-missing/)
___________________________________
Final Doom video:
Professor Doom1 on William Shanley
Do not Donate to Fraud
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciRNzCVOgF8
GlassSteagallfan
22nd April 2015, 19:04
----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_CIopDQYv0
Youtube description:
Published on Mar 31, 2015
HARTFORD, CT-- Wolfgang Halbig, former teacher, law enforcement, and current national school safety assessment & emergency management consultant, appeared in Hartford CT to find out why today's FOI hearing, which was filed for 19 months ago, was postponed ~ and to reschedule a new hearing. March 31, 2015
The CT Freedom of Information Commission was supposed to conduct a hearing in response to the appeal brought by Wolfgang Halbig some 19 months ago alleging violations of the CT Freedom of Information Act as set forth in Chapter 14 of the Connecticut General Statutes.
Halbig maintains that respondents have not answered simple questions pertaining to the Sandy Hook incident.
Complainant: WOLFGANG HALBIG
Respondent(s): FIRST SELECTMAN, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; CHIEF, POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; CHAIR, BOARD OF EDUCATION, NEWTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS; AND THE BOARD OF EDUCATION, NEWTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, c/o Monte E. Frank, Esq., Cohen and Wolf, P.C., Danbury, CT.
Halbig maintains that the so-called Sandy Hook CT shootings were a staged cooperative government - community "Capstone" exercise planned years before December 2012, for the purpose of banning commonly-used firearms and limiting free speech. Halbig asserts the incident was a financial bonanza for the Newtown community and involved parents, all involved parents moving into the CT community only between 2009-2011, and all receiving over $200K each for their involvement in the exercise. Halbig's questions to Newtown are returned with silence and contempt; threat of arrest.
Many details don't add up... record shows no report of actual shots fired; no social security numbers for the dead students; 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shootings, crime does not exist on the FBI 2012 crime report, tax accessor's website shows the families got free houses on Christmas day when all government offices are closed, no one sued the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza, no parent wanted to see their children in the school, closed casket funerals, no EMT's allowed in the school, the shooter was a 112 pound weakling with a debilitating condition but shoots like Rambo....with 95% percent kill rate, and much more.
#sandyhook
#sandyhookhoax
For more information visit: www.sandyhookjustice.com
Posters note: The hearings have been postponed to April 24th or April 30th, 2015
From the comments section at http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/04/15/sandy-hook-what-really-happened/
dachsielady says:
April 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM
Just a heads-up.
Wolfgang Halbig’s
Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission Hearing
Hartford Connecticut
Friday, April 24, 2015 2:00 pm Eastern Time
He has issued seven subpoenas to seven people.
Here are four of the seven people’s titles who will be required to be present and to testify at this administrative law hearing.
Newtown School District “School Superintendent”
Sandy Hook Elementary School (the new school) principal
“Head Custodian”
Newtown, Ct. Police Chief
--
jake gittes
22nd April 2015, 22:53
There is a good video I found under that article at Memory Hole w/Halbig discussing police photos of Sandy Hook shown in the video that reinforce the school-closed theory. The dirt, grime, mold and neglect are abundantly evident, much more so than what was previously available.
Rex
23rd April 2015, 17:21
I expect more delays and marginalization. Not sure Mr. Halbig is ever going to get to ask his 7 questions. But I'm damn glad it looks like he's never gonna give up.
Rex
28th April 2015, 15:05
Just found this:
Full Length Wolfgang Halbig v. Sandy Hook FOI Commission Hearing in Hartford CT 4/24/15
ZP1MVx3RQ2c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP1MVx3RQ2c
Pretty hefty at 2 hours and 19 minutes, just started watching and am not sure of the outcome as of this writing.
Here's the blurb from youtube:
HARTFORD CT-- Wolfgang Halbig, former teacher, law enforcement, and current national school safety assessment & emergency management consultant, appeared in Hartford CT for a FOIA hearing, the purpose of which is to ask simple questions that remain unanswered about Sandy Hook. The room was oppressively hot, and Halbig needs to return to CT for Part II, time and date to be decided.
Halbig maintains that respondents have not answered simple questions pertaining to the Sandy Hook incident.
Complainant: WOLFGANG HALBIG, c/o L. Kay Wilson, Esq., Glastonbury, CT.
Respondent(s): FIRST SELECTMAN, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; CHIEF, POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF NEWTOWN; CHAIR, BOARD OF EDUCATION, NEWTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS; AND THE BOARD OF EDUCATION, NEWTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, c/o Monte E. Frank, Esq., Danbury, CT.
Halbig maintains that the so-called Sandy Hook CT shootings were a staged cooperative government - community "Capstone" exercise planned years before December 2012, for the purpose of banning commonly-used firearms and limiting free speech. Halbig asserts the incident was a financial bonanza for the Newtown community and involved parents, all involved parents moving into the CT community only between 2009-2011, and all receiving over $200K each for their involvement in the exercise. Halbig's questions to Newtown are returned with silence and contempt; threat of arrest.
Many details don't add up... record shows no report of actual shots fired; no social security numbers for the dead students; 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shootings; crime does not exist on the FBI 2012 crime report; tax accessor's website shows the families got free houses on Christmas day when all government offices are closed; half-a-dozen charities set up for alleged victims days before the shootings; no one sued the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza; no parent wanted to see their children in the school; closed casket funerals; no EMT's allowed in the school; the shooter was a 112 pound weakling with a debilitating condition but shoots like Rambo....with 95% percent kill rate, and much more.
#sandyhook
#sandyhookhoax
For more information visit: www.sandyhookjustice.com
Rex
28th April 2015, 18:19
And the follow up:
Wolfgang Halbig Press Interview after the FOIA Hearing in Hartford CT 4/24/15
bFw37CJA2lU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFw37CJA2lU
HARTFORD CT-- Wolfgang Halbig is interviewed by Dan Bidondi of Infowars after his hearing at the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission. April 24, 2015
Wolfgang Halbig, former teacher, law enforcement, and current national school safety assessment & emergency management consultant, appeared in Hartford CT for a FOIA hearing which was filed for 19 months ago, the purpose of which is to ask simple questions that remain unanswered. The room was oppressively hot, and Halbig needs to return to CT for Part II, time and date to be decided.
Rex
29th April 2015, 18:05
Just some commentary on the video... It was somewhat painful to watch for me because I went into this thinking "slam dunk". Unfortunately Mr. Halbig and his lawyer couldn't seem to get to where they needed to go. There were at least 3 lines of questioning they attempted - one being call logs/communication between the cops, another the dashcam video available, and the last were the work orders for the supposed new security system and general maintenance.
The defense was on point and kept the questioning relevant to the specific FOIA requests. The bottom line was summed up early on when Mr. Halbig said that ultimately he didn't believe the defense had provided all the documents.
I thought Mr. Halbig really had something when he felt he had made it clear he wanted his requests filled by other than "the town". But then the defense had him read a document which defined quite clearly "the town" and it was precisely the folks he wanted answers from. Shenanigans from the defense? Maybe, but it didn't come off that way.
I only counted one big "win" and that was the fact that the dashcam video provided did not have the expected date/timestamp and other information that should have been embedded. The police chief had no good answer for that, stating all their video should have it. Even my cheap $30 dashcam has the date/timestamp. They shouldn't let that one go - something is clearly wrong here.
A minor "win" was the fact that some of the requests were fulfilled literally the day before the trial (is that why it was postponed?) So you don't get your FOIA requests filled unless you force a trial? I don't feel this was clearly stressed enough as a big problem.
I read some negative comments about the judge, but she seemed fair to me and even went out of her way to help Mr. Halbig and his lawyer a few times. I wonder what she really thinks about all this.
It's difficult enough to try to prove a document or specific content should exist when the defense says it doesn't. It's even more difficult to prove that it DOES exist when the defense says it doesn't. Unless the judge is well versed in similar matters from other cases, she won't know to question it. The defense is happily hiding behind all of this, a somewhat obvious strategy but it's definitely working.
Part 2 will likely be more of the same and I don't expect any windfalls unless they change their strategy. Maybe bring in experts who can attest to which specific documents should be available and what their content should be. But even then, if they prove some documents or content is missing, does it prove anything more than negligence? I think you need a whistle-blower type with credentials who has access to some of the key missing documents, or proof of purposeful destruction of said documents.
Unfortunately, instead of being a smoking gun, this case will just be another data point on the Sandy Hook anomaly list.
Cidersomerset
10th June 2015, 20:28
The Richie Allen Show on Davidicke.com: Wolfgang Halbig – ‘A Lot Of
People Have Gotten Very Wealthy Since The Sandy Hook Shooting Hoax’
Wednesday 10th June 2015 at 08:41 By ickonic
http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/get-attachment-10-587x383.jpg
gqPTACSJ-Pk
Published on 9 Jun 2015
Please Support The Show – http://richieallenshow.com/donate/
====================================================
JMTd0mqnL_Y
https://realquestionsnow.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/sandyhookgenerosineverybodymustcheckin.jpg
====================================================
Caravan To Midnight - The Wolf of Sandy Hook
DhPxV7Z1Vm4
Published on 5 Jun 2015
Caravan To Midnight - The Wolf of Sandy Hook
Wolfgang Halbig Speaks at Sandy Hook School Board Of Education Meeting June 2, 2015
Go to http://caravantomidnight.com/ for info on soon to be released footage of our
entire trip to Newtown, CT & Hartford CT
Cidersomerset
10th June 2015, 20:38
In the above vid with Richie , Wolfgang Halbig mentions financial oddities in the
town of Sandy Hook , multiple lottery wins and the strange House sales.
See article below.
====================================================
http://21stcenturywire.com/wp-content/themes/magazine/images/21-LOGO-230x115.png
Sandy Hook Victims: Lottery Jackpots and Free Homes – Two Unusual Clues Unearthed in Newtown
February 18, 2014 By 21wire 43 Comments
21st Century Wire says…
We’ve stumbled across these two incredibly interesting threads in the Sandy Hook
false flag investigation. Both of these findings are based purely on facts and data
(presented by publisher below), and they reveal some potentially volatile clues as
to strange goings on the the little hamlet of ‘Newtown’, Connecticut. Amazing…
Sandy Hook: CT State Worker Reveals Why He Resigned His Position… “It made me feel sick”
DC Clothesline
What would you do if you worked for a state government agency and you
suspected that they were covering up something really horrible?
http://i1.wp.com/www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/sandy-hook-elementary.jpg?
In a moment you will read an email from a gentleman who did the only thing he could do.
He quit.
I need you to understand a few things about this email. First off it was unsolicited
so it’s not in the form of any kind of interview. I went back and asked if I could use
this, because I feel it is that important.
Secondly, I want you to understand that I do not consider myself a professional
journalist. I am a truth seeker and a blogger. I am proud of that. I will always be a
blogger. As a blogger I allow myself to be human and I respect the same in others.
You will find that I have censored a lot of sections of this email and replaced those
sections with [bold letters in brackets] to try to give you an idea of the meaning.
Why? Because this isn’t a “Rosebud” fantasy piece. This person is real. He has a
family and the safety of his family means everything. I tried to get rid of things that
might give extra clues to his identity.
There are some things that, if left alone, would have made for a much bigger story,
but we just can’t go there. For instance, the website that is blacked out is a top-100
site that gets literally hundreds of millions of views per month. I recently read that
Drudge Report gets a billion page views per month and this page is decidedly more
popular. The executive is a recognizable name that is probably on the NSA speed-
dial list. All it would take is onephone call to get the ball rolling. The truth is that
the NSA probably already has copies of our emails, but we don’t want to take any
extra risks that have not already been taken.
With that said, I present the following email to you, because I think it’s important
for everyone to understand that there are those inside the Connecticut State
Government who have serious questions about what happened at Sandy Hook
Elementary. Here is the email:
Hi Dean,
I am neither a paid researcher nor journalist. I am a citizen of the State of CT- and
I was a State of CT employee for [xx-withheld] years, and recently resigned to
pursue a career in personal/private professionalinvestigations after, sadly, seeing
the way my efforts were change were not only thwarted, but held in contempt. The
frustration and cognitive (moral) dissonance of working for a [withheld-department
that employed him] which was acting in ways so as to support [changed- term used
generally means “immoral”] activity made me feel like a hypocrite, and I left a
financially comfortable job to seek something more personally satisfying. I add this
background because I’d like you to know I am college educated, worked for the
government (got quite the inside look at some things, nothing huge, I wasn’t that
important but enough), and continue to pursue higher education and my hobby of
investigating. I do not simply buy the news I am fed, but likewise I do not simply
buy aconspiracy theory. I inductively do my own investigating, research, collect
data, etc. I like #s, charts, hard facts. I love a good mystery.
The day after 12/14/12- Sandy Hook- I overheard a snippet of a conversation
between 2 very senior officials in the state dept in which I worked. I shouldn’t have
heard it, I know, because they were whispering and did not know I was around the
corner. Their tone discussing the ‘moment of silence’ we were about to be holding
in the office in honor of the victims was a joking tone, and one of the 2 alluded to
the other one something along the lines of “well that’s what we’re being fed, so just
do it” and they snickered and I wish I had paid more attention, but it made me feel sick.
Prior to that date, the word conspiracy made me laugh, and I brushed it off. But
something in their voices that day, caused me to file it away. Then…the reports of
conspiracy surrounding SH were popping up. And little by little, the veil was lifted.
At [xx-withheld] years old, I suddenly felt disdain for the media, and
embarrassment at how much I’d believed. And, I was off. Researching, navigating
public records, and sites as I’d been trained to do for work, I gathered much the
same data on the homes assessment values that I saw you did as well [referencing
this recent article by Dr. Eowyn]. I posted it on [extremely popular social
networking site-withheld] under the username [withheld] (if you go to [site
withheld]) and search for [username withheld] you *may* be able to see some
posts, or click link below. However, posting what you did, the 12/25/09 $0 values,
and my curious new finding that 3 of the victim’s families had won the CT lottery
twice, caused me to have my post removed, and my username banned from the
site-.my post was public info, in good taste, very factual and not at all breaking any
rules of the site.
Within an hour, I got a message- from [withheld, very influential online executive].
He said he personally removed my post and username- which he has never done
before- but that I was “making some people very uncomfortable”. I politely asked
what crime I committed in others’ discomfort- much of the info in challenging govt
and media is disconcerting, adding that I am uncomfortable with what I know as
well. He said basically that my information was “very thorough and well researched
and showed a lot of validity” and that he was contacted to remove it personally and
he did not want me to post anything further as I could cause a lawsuit, essentially…
Continue the lottery story here at DC Clothesline
AND THIS IS EVEN MORE INTERESTING…
The strange purchase date and price of Sandy Hook homes
DC Clothesline
Some of those in the blogosphere who maintain or at the very least suspect that
the official story of the Dec. 14, 2012 Sandy Hook massacre isn’t true, have raised
the matter of the rather strange sale date and price of the homes of some of the
victims. See, for example,this discussion on a Godlike Productions chat forum.
Their hypothesis goes something like this:
http://i2.wp.com/www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/real-estate-sold-sign1.jpg?
If the massacre, wholly or in part, were a contrived conspiracy — for example, a
drill (or a drill that went very bad) — then the major participants or “players” in the
elaborate charade would have to be paid off in some way or another.
Indeed, a year ago, in February 2013, I had noticed the same thing — that some of
the homes of Sandy Hook victims all had an odd sale/purchase date of 12/25/2009,
and an equally odd sale/purchase price of $0.
I had found that information on the website of Vision Government Solutions (VGS),
a company that calls itself “a leading supplier of land parcel management software
technology and services to local government organizations, enabling efficient
assessment, billing, collections, mapping, and permitting.” One of the services
provided by VGS is an online database of residential properties in nine states in the
northeastern and eastern U.S., one of which is the state of Connecticut. If you
know the address of a home in, say, Newtown, CT, you can look up the property’s
value, present owner(s), and price history on VGS’s database.
At the time, in February of last year, puzzled by those strange 12/25/2009 sale
date and $0 sale price of Newtown homes, I had sent this email to VGS:
Date: 02/05/13 01:43 PM
Subject: Feedback from the Newtown, CT page
Hello, While browsing real estate properties using this database, I noticed a number
of homes have the same “date of sale” of 12/25/2009, and a “sale price” of 0
(zero). Please be so kind as to explain. How can a home be sold or purchased for $0?
Thank you,
Dr. _____
This was the response I received:
Feb. 5, 2013
Thank you for your inquiry Dr ____. In most instances of a sale price of $0 the
reason would be because of a family sale where thehouse ownership is simply
transferred. [In other words, nomoney actually changed hands.] The other reason
for that to happen would be a town entering a parcel into their database for the
first time they must puta first owner and a sale price. Often times they will put $0
as a filler price. The sale date of 12/25/2009 would be the same thing.
Kind Regards,
Chase Moltedo
Customer Support Representative
Vision Government Solutions
44 Bearfoot Road
Northboro, MA 01532
In addition to emailing VGS, I had also called the Assessor’s Office at Newtown, CT,
and left a voice mail asking the same question about the 12/25/2009 sale date and
$0 sale price.
An administrative assistant at the Assessor’s Office, Andrea Santillo, promptly
returned my phone call. She said that the Newtown city government recently had
switched to a new computer system and had not been able to enter the property
data for all Newtown homes. So the computer used the 12/25/2009 and $0 as,
respectively, a “filler” default sale date and price.
Ms. Santillo’s explanation seemed plausible, and so I did not pursue the matter any
further. But that doesn’t mean I’d forgotten about it.Flash forward a year. I decided
to revisit this matter, and went back to VGS’s database. Lo and behold, the strange
sale date and price are still there.So I undertook a systematic investigation into the
properties of every Sandy Hook (SH) victim, as well as those of certain non-victims,
such as Gene Rosen, who had a prominent media presence in the days immediately
after the massacre. What follows is my report on my findings, beginning with my methodology…
Read More...
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/02/18/sandy-hook-victims-lottery-jackpots-and-free-homes-two-unusual-clues-unearthed-in-newtown/
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/02/14/strange-purchase-date-price-sandy-hook-homes/
Cidersomerset
10th June 2015, 21:01
Interview with Wolfgang Halbig starts aprox 29 mins in.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Hook: The Lies Keep Growing - Infowars Nightly News - 05/28/2015
Ml3KVj2nVRA
Published on 29 May 2015
On this Thursday, May 28th edition of the Infowars Nightly News David Knight
breaks down how the elite are subtly trying to dehumanize you and take your
rights. Then, bio-weapons labs exposed as careless time and time again with
deadly substances and finally, David Knight talks with Wolfgang Halbig about
the ever growing web of lies surrounding the Sandy Hook school shooting.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions
help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your
friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show
Akasha
11th July 2015, 17:32
....https://realquestionsnow.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/sandyhookgenerosineverybodymustcheckin.jpg.....
The video below shows that the EVERYBODY MUST CHECK IN sign only appeared on the 16th of December.
Not to detract from the real-estate high strangeness and other bizarrities (hey Dad, I just invented a new word!) , but the above sign could well be, well..... well-poisoning. I guess the real question is was such slack journalism simply a mistake, an error in the heat of the moment, or are they saying that it was ordered 1.5 hours after the event even though it didn't actually turn up until the 16th? From the clip in the video below, Wolfgang Halbig clearly states it was there on the 14th.
8Tf3F9J1ynY
BTW I'd highly recommend the Sandy Hook Research aka NamesnotMary (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXyw4WRFP1nqUN3qhP_lZkQ/videos) Youtube channel with regard to the related real-estate shenanigans. If anyone's gone deepest down that rabbit hole, it's her.
PS
.....
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/02/18/sandy-hook-victims-lottery-jackpots-and-free-homes-two-unusual-clues-unearthed-in-newtown/
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/02/14/strange-purchase-date-price-sandy-hook-homes/.....
Thanks for highlighting these articles, Cider'. Great stuff!
Cidersomerset
12th July 2015, 11:37
Not to detract from the real-estate high strangeness and other bizarrities (hey Dad, I just invented a new word!) , but the above sign could well be, well..... well-poisoning.
Thanks for highlighting Akasha , we cannot keep up with all the threads ,
but the poster makes a valid point about the check in sign not being put
out until 2 days after the shooting. I don'tthink Alex and Wolfgang are
deliberately misleading us , they just may have got it wrong . It will
come back to ' bite them in the ---' , if its true but there is so much
about these events , its if TPTB just want to cause fear and paranoia
as we know. So in one sense Alex feeds into that meme , but whether
you agree or disagree he is getting a lot of 'truths' out as well as the
inevitable misinfo deliberately put out to confuse the situation , and
of course mistakes do happen ....
Cidersomerset
12th July 2015, 12:40
What is a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ and why we should be proud to question the narrative
By ickonic on 12th July 2015
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Untitled-66.jpg
COiwwdd2oa4
Published on 4 Jul 2015
‘Jay Taylor discusses the roots of the term “conspiracy theorist” and the how the
CIA coined the the term to discredit those who questioned the system.’
Cidersomerset
12th July 2015, 12:57
One Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against Corporate Media For ‘Staging Sandy Hook Massacre’
By ickonic on 2nd July 2015 Coverups, Illuminati Criminals, Political Manipulation,
Problem-Reaction-Solution, The Police State
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/get-attachment-63.jpg
‘In another shocking twist in the Sandy Hook saga, Filmmaker and Author William Brandon
Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 Trillion Against Big Media Over Sandy
Hook Massacre Coverage.
Here is Mr. Shanley’s Statement:
“After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no
children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits
against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an
example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams
record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments:’
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/1-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-filed-against-msm-for-staging-sandy-hook-massacre
Read more: One Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against Corporate Media For ‘Staging Sandy Hook Massacre’
Akasha
18th July 2015, 14:14
Strange real estate activity was mentioned here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?68459-School-Safety-Expert-Wolfgang-Halbig-Threatened-for-Questioning-Sandy-Hook&p=968560&viewfull=1#post968560) and here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?68459-School-Safety-Expert-Wolfgang-Halbig-Threatened-for-Questioning-Sandy-Hook&p=977323&viewfull=1#post977323) (and maybe other posts too). Here's another interesting exposé of the subject.
Apologies if it's been posted before (or if it's been debunked). I couldn't find it using the search engine.
It's not new (march 2014) but just in case we missed it:
Would you be surprised to find out that in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, on the date of 12.25.2009, that almost every home in Sandy Hook, Connecticut was paid off.
Many people were given homes, and if they already lived there, their home was paid off. Think I'm foolin'? I'm gonna prove it to ya!.....
7wplo-wWTCw
idiit
18th July 2015, 14:59
List The Target Capabilities To Be Exercised:
Mass Prophylaxis
Mass Death of Children at a School by Firearms
Suicide or Apprehension of Unknown Shooter
Use of Media for Evaluation
Use of Media for Information Distribution
The Preparation for Mass Casualty is designed to establish a learning environment for players to exercise their plans and procedures for responding to an incident involving children as casualties. The Preparation for Mass Casualty will be conducted on 12/13/12, beginning at 8:00 am. Exercise play is scheduled until the Exercise Director/Controller determines that the exercise objectives have been met. Everyone must sign in with controller upon arrival.
^ excerpts from the sandy hook fema manual ( yes, sh fema manual does exist! :). https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/drill-site-activation-call-down-exercise-plan_a.pdf 3-5 minute read fyi.
Wolfgang Halbig, the former Florida State Trooper, former school principal and nationally recognized school safety expert, has made great strides in exposing the corrupt background of the Sandy Hook event, including that the school was in deplorable condition (inside and out), confirming my previous determination that it had been abandoned by 2008 and was used as a prop (or stage setting) for the FEMA drill rehearsal on 13 December 2012 and "going LIVE" on 14 December 2015, available on-line directly or from memoryholeblog.com.
Among the most curious aspects of the Sandy Hook event (which have puzzled many students)include the presence of a sign saying, "Everyone must check in!", Port-a-Potties, boxes of bottled water and pizza cartons in the Firehouse, name tags on lanyards and parents cheerfully bringing their children to the scene of (what was alleged to be) a child-shooting massacre. Wolfgang and his attorney were able to extract from Newtown First Selectman (which is an office), Patricia Llorda, that the sign had been placed there, not by the city, but by Homeland Security, which drew audible gasps from those who were present: emphasis mine
All of this, of course, is consistent with the FEMA manual for the event, which declares there will be a rehearsal on 13 December 2012, where the event will "go live" on 14 December, where it states (in the manual) that everyone must check in and that refreshments and restrooms will be provided. The reason Wolfgang has been unable to obtain information as innocuous as who had provided the Port-a-Potties is because it would have revealed that they were delivered on 13 December, the day before the alleged shooting, which would have thereby exposed the entire hoax.
tons more good stuff at the link below:
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/07/wolfgang-halbig-and-sandy-hook-trick-or.html
fetzer's work is almost without peer in conspiracy theory topics. I highly recommend you bookmark his blog and cruise by his site on a regular basis. you can go into his archives for more great work by professor fetzer.
Selkie
1st August 2015, 12:22
I just found this on Rense, by Wolfgang Halbig
http://www.rense.com/general96/sandysend.html
Scroll down to see pictures from inside the school.
Meggings
30th August 2015, 14:15
LAWSUITS BEING FILED FOR STAGING THE SANDY HOOK "MASSACRE"
This is the correct citizen response to realizing that the media and some government officials are making fools of the US public.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/1-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-filed-against-msm-for-staging-sandy-hook-massacre
Case Name: Shanley v. Smith et al
Case Number:3:14-cv-01881-JAM
Filer: William Brandon Shanley
Mr. Shanley’s Complaint states, in part:
"Defendants entered in a multi-year conspiracy, meeting in groups separately and together, to commit fraud and terrorism, i.e., to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the “Sandy Hook Massacre” was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA National Level Exercise Event that redirected government resources to terrorize the public. These crimes were undertaken with the intent of subverting the US Constitution and to affect national, state and local laws. This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts, and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions.
"The true costs of this breach of integrity and trust to society are unfathomable. Instead of fulfilling their Constitutional Role as the People’s Surrogates and being honest brokers of information, the Plaintiff will show how the men and women who dominate the TV news industry in the United States broke laws, besmirched the First Amendment, their Constitutional role as government watchdogs, and forfeited the right to report the news, and thereby profit from news production and distribution. The sine qua non of journalism is the search for truth. Our Fourth Estate chose a different path. Punitive damages of one year’s annual revenue from each Defendant are being sought to establish a News Trust, that will free journalism and restore trust and integrity to our communications sources. A democracy cannot survive this tyranny over human consciousness.
"The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion usd, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint."
Selkie
30th August 2015, 14:21
LAWSUITS BEING FILED FOR STAGING THE SANDY HOOK "MASSACRE"
This is the correct citizen response to realizing that the media and some government officials are making fools of the US public.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/1-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-filed-against-msm-for-staging-sandy-hook-massacre
Case Name: Shanley v. Smith et al
Case Number:3:14-cv-01881-JAM
Filer: William Brandon Shanley
Mr. Shanley’s Complaint states, in part:
"Defendants entered in a multi-year conspiracy, meeting in groups separately and together, to commit fraud and terrorism, i.e., to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the “Sandy Hook Massacre” was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA National Level Exercise Event that redirected government resources to terrorize the public. These crimes were undertaken with the intent of subverting the US Constitution and to affect national, state and local laws. This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts, and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions.
"The true costs of this breach of integrity and trust to society are unfathomable. Instead of fulfilling their Constitutional Role as the People’s Surrogates and being honest brokers of information, the Plaintiff will show how the men and women who dominate the TV news industry in the United States broke laws, besmirched the First Amendment, their Constitutional role as government watchdogs, and forfeited the right to report the news, and thereby profit from news production and distribution. The sine qua non of journalism is the search for truth. Our Fourth Estate chose a different path. Punitive damages of one year’s annual revenue from each Defendant are being sought to establish a News Trust, that will free journalism and restore trust and integrity to our communications sources. A democracy cannot survive this tyranny over human consciousness.
"The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion usd, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint."
This is wonderful news. And things like this can be crowd-funded, to pay court costs, and what-not.
Althena
14th December 2015, 17:55
http://i.imgur.com/0QuUNZH.png
As the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary rolls around this December 14th, 2015, it is well worth remembering what a strange, unique, manipulative and horrific event occurred on December 14th, 2012. When I say horrific, I am not referring to what you may think was the horrific aspect of the event: the gunning down of 20 innocent children and 6 innocent adults. That is unquestionably horrific, but to date there has hardly been enough evidence to prove beyond all doubt that actual people were gunned down.
Sandy Hook has become colloquially known as the Sandy Hook Hoax or Sandy Hoax, the first false flag in recent history to be exposed as an entirely fabricated event, replete with a fake setting (a fake school) and fake victims. It marks the first in a series of false flag hoaxes where fake victims and fake victims’ families (crisis actors) have been used. Since the majority of people still cannot fathom that Sandy Hook was a staged event, the template of using crisis actors has been used again and again (e.g. at the Boston Marathon). Now that we are passing the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary, it’s time to turn back the clock and re-examine some unanswered questions pertaining to the event.
By the way, if you think Sandy Hook no longer matters, ask yourself why Amazon (on behalf of the US Government) felt so scared it had to engage in censorship by trying to ban Jim Fetzer’s book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (available for free here). Sandy Hook is still very relevant, because it was a scam of massive proportions. Take a look how many false flag mass shootings are still being carried out monthly and even weekly (e.g. Paris, San Bernardino) to terrorize the public, push gun control and achieve other political and geopolitical aims.
andy Hook: 33 Unanswered Questions
There are still some who cannot bring themselves to believe that criminal elements within the US Government could pull off a false flag hoax like this. Yet, it must be remembered that in this day and age it is all too easy to fake photographic and video evidence. Photoshop and other software programs allow the user to construct any kind of photo they want. If you want to know some of the truth about what really happened at Sandy Hook, 2 of the best documentaries (out of many) that expose the absurdity of the official narrative and provide alternative theories are We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook (various independent media analysts) and Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 Dimensions (Sofia Smallstorm). Here is a list of 33 unanswered questions about Sandy Hook:
Sandy Hook: Foreknowledge and Preparation
1. Why was a Facebook webpage for the alleged dead teacher Victoria Soto of Sandy Hook Elementary School posted before the event occurred?
2. Why was the United Way charity webpage for Sandy Hook posted before the event occurred?
http://i.imgur.com/cTAPChe.png
Google caught evidence of foreknowledge: this United Way charity website page was launched on Dec. 11th, 2012, a full 3 days before the mass shooting at Sandy Hook actually occurred!
. How did the Arlington Red Devils website post the book on Talking With Children/Students About the Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting on 12/10/2012 (which was contained in the page url), 4 days before the event occurred? If this were some kind of technical glitch, then how did Google’s bots manage to record a cached page for 12/13/2012, still 1 day before the Sandy Hook shooting happened?
4. How did John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas with a lot of activity occurring there at the time), who was CEO of the local Newton bank, start a victims’ fund on the same day so quickly after the event, after receiving in his words “countless requests” to do so? Is it just a coincidence that Trentacosta was also a member of a new council of the New York Federal Reserve, the Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council?
5. According to various researchers, why was the Newtown community seeded with new families in the years leading up to the event?
6. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why were 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shooting?
Sandy Hook: Media Switching Stories
7. Why did the media keep switching its narrative as the story unfolded regarding the actual weapon used? Finally they settled upon a rifle. But how could a rifle kill 26 people in such quick succession?
Sandy Hook: Inconsistencies with Witness Stories
8. Why did known actor and Sandy Hook witness Gene Rosen keep changing his story about how he encountered the 6 kids who allegedly came to him? In different interviews he variously claims he found the kids just after feeding his cats in the loft, just after going to breakfast and just after coming home from breakfast. His testimony completely conflicts with that of the school bus driver and the official report. There is also video of him near the fire house walking around slowly, plus a video of him rehearsing his lines with the cameraman …
Sandy Hook: Lack Of Evidence
9. How was a skinny 19-year-old boy with no military training capable of killing 26 people clean while injuring none? (Trained military veterans have claimed it was highly unlikely or even impossible for someone with the weight of Adam Lanza to execute that many people in so short a time.)
10. Why was there no evidence of blood? A total of 26 fatalities (children and adult) would produce at least at a conservative estimate 20 gallons (75 liters) of blood. Thus would require a concerted blood cleanup (blood is considered a biohazard in this type of situation), yet when Sofia Smallstorm asked who did the cleanup, all the departments were ignorant of it and even claimed that no one did the cleanup.
11. Where are the alleged 600+ children of Sandy Hook Elementary School? Why is there absolutely no photo or video evidence of any dead bodies? Why did coroner Wayne Carver say the following?
Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—
12. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no social security numbers for the dead students?
13. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no report of actual shots fired?
14. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the Sandy Hook shooting crime not exist on the FBI 2012 crime report?
15. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the tax accessor’s website shows the victims’ families got free houses on Christmas day when all Government offices are closed?
16. Why were all the ambulances parked at the fire house away from the crime scene (except one on Dickinson Dr. which was also too far removed to be helpful)? Why were so few EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians) allowed in the school?
Sandy Hook: Faked Photos and Evidence of a Drill
17. Why does the iconic image of the teacher leading kids out of school contain evidence of Photoshop doctoring and fakery?
http://i.imgur.com/r8xIKL0.jpg
he iconic image of Sandy Hook – the evacuation – shows numerous signs of fakery, from Photoshop doctoring to EXIF data.
8. Why does the Sandy Hook Timeline of Evacuation not match the video evidence from the trooper’s car stationed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School car park?
19. Why was there a big electronic sign erected at the entrance to the Sandy Hook Elementary school stating “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN” if the event were real and not a drill?
20. Why was there an active shooter drill at around the same place and the same time as the Sandy Hook event? Every recent false flag since at least 9/11 has had this element.
21. Why are people walking around the Sandy Hook fire house in circles like a movie set? Why was there such a lack of urgency in the emergency personnel who were responding for many hours after 10am when people were still unaccounted for (e.g. nurse Sally Cox who claims she hid in a closet for 4 hours until 1:15pm)?
Sandy Hook: Coverup
22. If Sandy Hook Elementary School was a legitimate and operational school at the time of the event, why is there evidence that the school shut in 2009 due to asbestos, was reinspected in 2011, and was flooded again with Hurricanes Irene and Sandy? We know FEMA and the US Federal Government supplied money to Newtown to revitalize it. Why does the local business Apex Glass claim they were using the school premises for their glass business (apologies but the interview revealing this information has been taken down by YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9vLEzNsI00])?
http://i.imgur.com/p36KzMB.jpg
Sandy Hook: If this were a real mass shooting and not a drill, why must everyone check in?
3. Why were the entire school grounds of what we were told was “Sandy Hook Elementary School” demolished and rebuilt? Does this remind you of how the metal scraps from 9/11 were immediately shipped off to China before they could be examined for evidence?
24. Why did Town Clerk Debbie Aurelia and Connecticut State Attorney Kevin Kane refuse to release the death certificates and the names of the “victims”? Why did Connecticut officials conspire to pass an unprecedented bill banning FOIA requests and access to death certificates and other information, normally part of the public record as a matter of course for centuries? Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy signed the bill on June 5th, 2013.
25. Why were there so many black and silver (Government-type) cars around the school and fire house in place before the event?
26. According to Sofia Smallstorm, why were the exact number (26) of Christmas trees for the memorial already sitting outside the fire house before the event occurred?
27. Why do so many of the victims’ family members appear to be acting, smirking, giggling, snickering and outright laughing after the event, such as Robbie Parker?
Sandy Hook: Strange Comments by Officials
28. How does one explain the highly strange behavior of Wayne Carver, the chief medical examiner and coroner? Why did Carver say that “You can control a situation depending on your photographer, and I have very good photographers”? Why did Carver say that “I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their heads later”?
29. Why did Lieutenant Paul Vance threaten to prosecute as a crime anyone who reported information that contradicted the official narrative?
30. Why did the Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy say that “The Lieutenant Governor and I have been spoken to in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state”?
http://i.imgur.com/Gq3v8tq.jpg
Even Sandy Hook is infected with one eye Illuminati-Masonic symbolism. Just a coincidence?
Sandy Hook: Aftermath
31. Why did no one sue the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza?
32. How is it that no parent wanted to see the dead bodies of their children in the school?
33. Why were all the funerals conducted with closed caskets?
Conclusion: Sandy Hook – The Template for the False Flag Hoax
Sandy Hook smells rotten, and just as 9/11 was a template and justification for future transgressions against liberty, so too was Sandy Hook to become the template for the false flag hoax. Let us always remember what happened and continue to investigate it, so that future false flag events, and false flag hoax events, can be quickly spotted.
Akasha
14th December 2015, 19:22
This thread by John Kuhles (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?55092-HR-5736-Government-New-Powers--Tyranny--over-ANY-Mass-Media-MAKE-THIS-VIRAL-Sandy-Hook&p=627645&viewfull=1#post627645) and this thread by Referee (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?55086-HR-5736-the-Smith-Mundt-Modernization-Act-of-2012--USA-&p=627612&viewfull=1#post627612) indicate how America amended the Smith-Mundt anti-domestic propaganda act in order to allow propagandizing of the American people (and by default, any members of the international community who follow US media), without fear of prosecution, just before Sandy Hook - how convenient.
.....From Wiki on the subject of the Smith-Mundt Modernization act of 2012:
The US Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Public Law 80-402), popularly referred to as the Smith–Mundt Act, specifies the terms in which the United States government can engage global audiences, also known as public diplomacy. The act was first introduced as the Bloom Bill in December 1945 in the 79th Congress and subsequently passed by the 80th Congress and signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on January 27, 1948.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (section 1078 (a)) amended the US Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, allowing for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within U.S. borders for the Archivist of the United States.....here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith%E2%80%93Mundt_Act)
.....The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012[35] was introduced by U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry on May 10, 2012 in the House of Representatives.[35] The bill purpose is "to authorize the domestic dissemination of information and material about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences"[35] The act was added to the 2013 NDAA bill as section of 1078 to amend certain passages of Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987.[36] The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 passed Congress as part of the NDAA 2013 on December 28, 2012.[36] Amendments made to the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987 allow for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within US borders.....here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2013)
xS-ktfaxPb0
Clear Light
22nd December 2015, 18:39
Ah! So I was just browsing the UK mainstream press and the following article caught my attention :
Guardian UK : Families of Sandy Hook victims to split $1.5m in lawsuit settlement (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/22/sandy-hook-newtown-families-lawsuit-settlement) (22 Dec 2015)
Quote from Article :
The families of more than a dozen victims of the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, will split $1.5m under recently finalized settlements of lawsuits against the gunman’s mother’s estate
31. Why did no one sue the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza?
^^^^ Now Answered ^^^^
Wow how time has flown, three years already ?
Anyhow, so I remember amongst all the controversy at the time about it being Real or a Hoax, that there were no Graphic photographs at all, either of the deceased or of the vicinity in which it took place ... Sorry if this sounds a little unfeeling but it would've put my mind to rest at once had such images been made available !
One or two more Clicks of my mouse and I was reading a rebuttal to the idea that no-one had actually died (wherein State Records seemed to corroborate this idea because of an Absence of such information).
A Sandy Hook Blog : Jim Fetzer's Nobody Died at Sandy Hook Debunked - Social Security Death Index (http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/jim-fetzers-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook.html) (19 Dec 2015)
Quote from Blog :
Note: You can verify the work by search of the SSDI via a subscription to Ancestory.com. Anyone can get a free trial subscription to Ancestory.com with access the SSDI.
[...]
Every victim returned with their listing in the Connecticut's Death Index file. The CT Death Index included place of death. Each victim's place of death was checked and listed as "Sandy Hook, Connecticut". Each were substantially similar to this:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BCHlix9bzKs/VnYtlQ7qssI/AAAAAAAABvQ/ehsJhGhJsKI/s1600/noah%2Bct%2Bres2%2B--nb.PNG
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kj_jC3PLP0s/VnYkh1VNXXI/AAAAAAAABsA/AoD9ixWJEAc/s1600/charlotte-2a.PNG
12. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no social security numbers for the dead students?
^^^^ Now Answered ^^^^
bettye198
28th May 2016, 22:16
Like many of you, we have seen bits and pieces of the false flag at Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon and others. Enough for me to make a conscious decision that I need real proof even though my instinct tells me that there is always an agenda to dupe us. This particular video may be 53 min long, but the first 10 min will grab you and the following 20 min knock you sideways. The speaker of this video is well versed, talks no nonsense non stop and bullet points every reason why Sandy Hook was a joke. His documented proof will never be shown on national television but if you are interested, here it is.
KPt6UNUAZqM
Jay Freeman
29th May 2016, 17:04
It amazes me how seemingly intelligent people still believe the Sandy Hook Hoax. When Fetzer's book was banned by Amazon, I wrote Amazon and told them they would never see another dollar from me because of it (and they haven't). Prior to that time, I purchased everything through them for years. I then wrote about it on Facebook and spoke to people I knew, urging them to not support those who are blatantly destroying what little freedom we have left. Not one person on Facebook even commented on that post, and at the tail end of a conversation I had with another friend via email, this friend started talking about something else and her next comment was that she needed to get on Amazon and make a purchase!
Every individual is responsible for his own self-creation. Every time we reincarnate, we have opportunities to self-create our spiritual self. We alone are responsible for the development of our own consciousness, and yet most of the world seems to be completely oblivious to this. So, having done little to no work, at the end of our/their lives (as Endall Beall states in Willful Evolution), "our bodies die, the ego disconnects from the soul, and the soul reincarnates once again to try becoming self-created once more, and the cycle repeats ad infinitum, with very few ever becoming self-created." (Emphasis mine.)
There are many things we can do nothing about. But the question is, what do we do about the things we can do something about? For one thing, NO! is a very powerful word, and we can probably use it a lot more than we do. NO, I will not support your (suppressive or immoral) business with my money. NO, I will not go along with your immoral program. NO, I will not condone your ill treatment of others. NO, I will not put my paycheck above my own conscience. NO, NO, NO. Those who may read this here are in all likelihood the proverbial "choir," which is a pleasant breeze in contrast to the majority of First Cognition folks "out there" who remain mostly clueless.
Thanks for letting me rant. (By the way, if anyone would like to discuss any of Doug Michael's videos or Endall Beall's books, I recently set up a group here for this purpose.)
It amazes me how seemingly intelligent people still believe the Sandy Hook Hoax. When Fetzer's book was banned by Amazon, I wrote Amazon and told them they would never see another dollar from me because of it (and they haven't). Prior to that time, I purchased everything through them for years. I then wrote about it on Facebook and spoke to people I knew, urging them to not support those who are blatantly destroying what little freedom we have left. Not one person on Facebook even commented on that post, and at the tail end of a conversation I had with another friend via email, this friend started talking about something else and her next comment was that she needed to get on Amazon and make a purchase!
Every individual is responsible for his own self-creation. Every time we reincarnate, we have opportunities to self-create our spiritual self. We alone are responsible for the development of our own consciousness, and yet most of the world seems to be completely oblivious to this. So, having done little to no work, at the end of our/their lives (as Endall Beall states in Willful Evolution), "our bodies die, the ego disconnects from the soul, and the soul reincarnates once again to try becoming self-created once more, and the cycle repeats ad infinitum, with very few ever becoming self-created." (Emphasis mine.)
There are many things we can do nothing about. But the question is, what do we do about the things we can do something about? For one thing, NO! is a very powerful word, and we can probably use it a lot more than we do. NO, I will not support your (suppressive or immoral) business with my money. NO, I will not go along with your immoral program. NO, I will not condone your ill treatment of others. NO, I will not put my paycheck above my own conscience. NO, NO, NO. Those who may read this here are in all likelihood the proverbial "choir," which is a pleasant breeze in contrast to the majority of First Cognition folks "out there" who remain mostly clueless.
Thanks for letting me rant. (By the way, if anyone would like to discuss any of Doug Michael's videos or Endall Beall's books, I recently set up a group here for this purpose.)
A belated welcome to you, Jay Freeman! I really appreciate your post. You may be preaching to the choir, but I really needed to hear what you have to say. I have seen myself slipping in a number of ways lately and it is time for me to take a good, hard look at some of the things I am doing, and tolerating. Your post reminded me of the bigger picture.
I have a lot of admiration for James Fetzer for taking the time to learn all of the details about Sandy Hook and then having the fortitude and courage to present the facts in such an intelligent and comprehensive manner. The fact that Amazon has banned his book just speaks to the power and influence of corporations. I believe that the controls we will have in the future will mostly be controls that we place on ourselves. Self censorship, being a great example of that. How many people would boycott Facebook, Amazon, Apple just to name a few to take a stand? Not enough.
If people would just take the time to really watch his presentation their entire world view would be shifted. As most of us know, once the door is opened but a crack, it can never be shut again. I guess there are those that will never risk opening it in the slightest for fear that the facade will crumble.
Daozen
30th May 2016, 00:25
I then wrote about it on Facebook and spoke to people I knew, urging them to not support those who are blatantly destroying what little freedom we have left. Not one person on Facebook even commented on that post,
FB can shadowban posts. I've seen it happen first hand. You think the post is displaying normally, but no one else can see it.
thepainterdoug
30th May 2016, 01:21
When Dr Fetzer gets going, theres non better.
Michelle Marie
30th May 2016, 04:10
It amazes me how seemingly intelligent people still believe the Sandy Hook Hoax. When Fetzer's book was banned by Amazon, I wrote Amazon and told them they would never see another dollar from me because of it (and they haven't). Prior to that time, I purchased everything through them for years. I then wrote about it on Facebook and spoke to people I knew, urging them to not support those who are blatantly destroying what little freedom we have left. Not one person on Facebook even commented on that post, and at the tail end of a conversation I had with another friend via email, this friend started talking about something else and her next comment was that she needed to get on Amazon and make a purchase!
Every individual is responsible for his own self-creation. Every time we reincarnate, we have opportunities to self-create our spiritual self. We alone are responsible for the development of our own consciousness, and yet most of the world seems to be completely oblivious to this. So, having done little to no work, at the end of our/their lives (as Endall Beall states in Willful Evolution), "our bodies die, the ego disconnects from the soul, and the soul reincarnates once again to try becoming self-created once more, and the cycle repeats ad infinitum, with very few ever becoming self-created." (Emphasis mine.)
There are many things we can do nothing about. But the question is, what do we do about the things we can do something about? For one thing, NO! is a very powerful word, and we can probably use it a lot more than we do. NO, I will not support your (suppressive or immoral) business with my money. NO, I will not go along with your immoral program. NO, I will not condone your ill treatment of others. NO, I will not put my paycheck above my own conscience. NO, NO, NO. Those who may read this here are in all likelihood the proverbial "choir," which is a pleasant breeze in contrast to the majority of First Cognition folks "out there" who remain mostly clueless.
Thanks for letting me rant. (By the way, if anyone would like to discuss any of Doug Michael's videos or Endall Beall's books, I recently set up a group here for this purpose.)
Amen! That's taking your power back, not ranting. Go!
Peace & Freedom,
MM
Jay Freeman
6th June 2016, 15:10
FB can shadowban posts. I've seen it happen first hand. You think the post is displaying normally, but no one else can see it.
That wouldn't surprise me in the least, but sometimes the problem is with the user who does not understand the settings. If it is marked as "Me only" rather than "Friends" or "Public", then you are right, no one else would see it.
Daozen
6th June 2016, 15:28
It could be something as simple as that, right. Once I got #hashtag order wrong# in twitter#, and I thought they were banning me. lol. This is conspiracy land.
Frenchy
1st July 2016, 18:47
I then wrote about it on Facebook ... Not one person on Facebook even commented on that post,
FB can shadowban posts. I've seen it happen first hand. You think the post is displaying normally, but no one else can see it.
Hi Daozen,
`Although I've never of ' Shadow-ban ' before, I wonder if this is the same kind of thing I experienced when trying to post a comment on the YAHOO (UK) News comment section ? ( I notice if I try to post responses suggesting people might seek other sources, ( UKColumn.org, RD Hall, Abel Danger , etc... ) )
because I saw NO reply at all, I logged-out, then viewed anonomously, which showed me MY post was absent ? ? ?
I am shy of 'Opening-posts ', but do you think many PA members are aware of this ? And how to present Strong supporting evidence ?
greetings....
Daozen
2nd July 2016, 00:18
Hi Frenchy,
Shadow banning happens. In this case, it might be seen as Yahoo protecting their revenue, but it's still an underhand tactic.
If you didn't want to make an OP you could make a post in any relevant thread. When the evidence was strong enough, you could then make a thread, or someone else could.
You could present strong evidence by 1) Screengrabbing the thread. Or even better 2) Using a screencaster to do it. It would take an hour or two to set up, but might be worth the time.
Sometimes it's just a mistake the user makes. I have been wrong sometimes.. but other times, it's manipulation.
Good luck. It's a worthwhile project... if you caught them red handed it might make the front page of Reddit.
Betty
11th July 2016, 01:18
Wolfgang Halbig needs our support. He is being very diligent, working hard. He is up against a very strong adversary. Maybe one of these days I'll get the hang of how to insert these videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
[video=youtube;aTvUZnzQ7Zc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTvUZnzQ7ZcHook Justice Report by Wolfgang Halbig June 2, 2016 Episode #10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTvUZnzQ7Zc
Sandy Hook Justice Report by Wolfgang Halbig July 5 2016 Episode #11
5vU_Kq6bEug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vU_Kq6bEug
Curiosity
28th July 2016, 20:18
Not sure if this has been covered here yet and not sure if this is the right place to post it so move it to other links.
This is new to me though.
"In a shocking twist in the Sandy Hook saga, film maker and author William Brandon Shanley decided pursued a number of lawsuits in excess of more than $1 Trillion against the mainstream media and government in 2014. Shortly after, he was framed and thrown in jail. Now he’s out and refiling those lawsuits, albeit sightly fearful for his life."
READ MORE
http://www.disclose.tv/news/lawsuit_filed_against_government_and_media_for_staging_sandy_hook/133618?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fb_organic
ghostrider
28th July 2016, 20:47
Right, we never saw one funeral , with that many we should have seen rows of hearses every day, and articles in the paper... They basically closed down the school and the community involved, paid off every one's house , and shut it all down...
Conde
28th July 2016, 21:07
Free download best evidence !
http://rense.com/general96/nobodydied.html
shadowstalker
28th July 2016, 21:14
did anyone also notice that not many ppl where wearing winter coats or coats at all, I checked the weather for that day. it was 32 degrees that day.
did anyone notice that some folks where wearing shorts as well?
Curiosity
28th July 2016, 21:16
did anyone also notice that not many ppl where wearing winter coats or coats at all, I checked the weather for that day. it was 32 degrees that day.
did anyone notice that some folks where wearing shorts as well?
Interesting observation.
TargeT
28th July 2016, 21:28
did anyone also notice that not many ppl where wearing winter coats or coats at all, I checked the weather for that day. it was 32 degrees that day.
did anyone notice that some folks where wearing shorts as well?
Doesn't appear to be the case, these people look appropriately dressed for mid 30's low 40's weather.
oXX3Npaeyz4
Curiosity
28th July 2016, 21:41
did anyone also notice that not many ppl where wearing winter coats or coats at all, I checked the weather for that day. it was 32 degrees that day.
did anyone notice that some folks where wearing shorts as well?
Doesn't appear to be the case, these people look appropriately dressed for mid 30's low 40's weather.
oXX3Npaeyz4
Same here they all are wearing jackets etc.
Mandala
28th July 2016, 22:17
My big question is where do the missing people go of these false flags. For instance in 911, the people who were on the planes and "died" in a fiery crash , what the hell did they do with them? Are the all sent to moon base or Mars to be indentured slaves. What a story that would be, unless they were all murdered in cold blood.
Every once in a while you will see an article that says, "How can you say no one died, my sister lost her only child in that fiasco. So what are your thoughts?
TargeT
28th July 2016, 22:25
just watch this video, you'll be convinced.
VpFopWtcu8E
shadowstalker
28th July 2016, 23:11
Doesn't appear to be the case, these people look appropriately dressed for mid 30's low 40's weather.
some of them are not appropriately dressed some even have there sleeves rolled up, you will not find that for 32 degree weather for folks who live that close to the water in CT.
and that is not the vid i found it in.
Check the 2:05 minute mark, the police officer is out of uniform. fall attire when he would be wearing a full fledged bulky police coat, that's just a sample.
There are dozens out there, i just dont remember which one or where to find them as most have been removed
pyrangello
28th July 2016, 23:39
Long documentary over 2 1/2 hours but very well executed and the foundation of the facts seem to layout the agendas and of course always follow the money ! Highly suggest watching it to make your own decision and conclusion. Thanks for the link Curiosity !
ghostrider
28th July 2016, 23:50
The ones that aren't dressed right are crisis actors, the locals know how to be prepaired...
ghostrider
29th July 2016, 00:54
What is very telling is, the main stream media usually runs stories over and over and over again... they did six months on the death of Anna Nicole Smith but, several kids supposedly murdered at school and it barely gets coverage... I think he whole thing was theater, testing public reaction , and trial run for even higger movies/staged psyop events ...
pyrangello
29th July 2016, 15:16
I listened to one interview where they said there are 2 companies here in the US that supply crisis actors from their company to whatever is needed by whomever whatever that means . All the way around interesting if true.
Frenchy
29th July 2016, 21:09
My big question is where do the missing people go of these false flags. For instance in 911, the people who were on the planes and "died" in a fiery crash , what the hell did they do with them? Are the all sent to moon base or Mars to be indentured slaves. What a story that would be, unless they were all murdered in cold blood.
Every once in a while you will see an article that says, "How can you say no one died, my sister lost her only child in that fiasco. So what are your thoughts?
Hi Mandala ![ and everyone ]
In the case of Sandy Hook, it seems that the Crisis acting ' Families ' were put in place a year or two, BEFORE the Drama...
Others research into property registration / Mortagages show the dates of occupancy and 'paid-in-full', details...
An event planned a loooong time before !
ps, I like this humour ! >>>>>33885
bettye198
30th July 2016, 03:45
I think James Fetzer video nails it. Very succinct, excellent research and no nonsense.
KPt6UNUAZqM
AutumnW
30th July 2016, 04:28
What is very telling is, the main stream media usually runs stories over and over and over again... they did six months on the death of Anna Nicole Smith but, several kids supposedly murdered at school and it barely gets coverage... I think he whole thing was theater, testing public reaction , and trial run for even higger movies/staged psyop events ...
Mainstream media doesn't want to appear to be exploiting the deaths of young children. It's like ambulance chasing. Plus, the news has become substance free, no depth, zero muckraking. They also don't show things like close ups of major gory car crashes etc.. anymore.
You will note that there was very little coverage of the little boy who was recently killed by an alligator in Florida. Nobody doubts it happened though.
I think many acts of terrorism are false flags and 911 was an inside job, but not this.
Shannon
10th August 2016, 04:07
What is very telling is, the main stream media usually runs stories over and over and over again... they did six months on the death of Anna Nicole Smith but, several kids supposedly murdered at school and it barely gets coverage... I think he whole thing was theater, testing public reaction , and trial run for even higger movies/staged psyop events ...
Mainstream media doesn't want to appear to be exploiting the deaths of young children. It's like ambulance chasing. Plus, the news has become substance free, no depth, zero muckraking. They also don't show things like close ups of major gory car crashes etc.. anymore.
You will note that there was very little coverage of the little boy who was recently killed by an alligator in Florida. Nobody doubts it happened though.
I think many acts of terrorism are false flags and 911 was an inside job, but not this.
I hear what you're saying, autumnW ... Really I do. It's just that there's so much that is totally mind blowing and so unbelievable, that I can't believe other people don't see it or even care.
Like gene Rosen. Explain that guy and all the stories and the interviews and the rehearsing. He was walking around the school AND saving children at home ?
I'm just can't say this is real. I refuse to. No one will answer any questions. It's all shady.
onawah
28th August 2016, 16:54
Why Did They Pass a Law That Makes Staged Hoaxes and Crisis-Acted Movies Legal?
xS-ktfaxPb0
One comment from the youtube page: "Wolfgang Halbig has been investigating this for almost 4 years. Look on the Sandy Hook Justice site. He put his life on the line by continuing to ask questions and seek FOIA documents, get a lawyer, the whole nine yards. We all should send him some money for all his expenses & lawyer fees."
ThePythonicCow
31st August 2016, 22:04
One comment from the youtube page: "Wolfgang Halbig has been investigating this for almost 4 years. Look on the Sandy Hook Justice site. He put his life on the line by continuing to ask questions and seek FOIA documents, get a lawyer, the whole nine yards. We all should send him some money for all his expenses & lawyer fees."
Wolfgang Halbig has just been forced to take his Sandy Hook website down: Wolfgang Halbig Coerced Into Removing ‘Sandy Hook Justice Report’ Website, Ceasing Investigation (MemoryHoleBlog.com) (https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/08/30/wolfgang-halbig-coerced-into-removing-sandy-hook-justice-report-website-ceasing-investigation/).
RunningDeer
31st August 2016, 23:08
Nobody Died At Sandy Hook (http://www.naturalnews.com/files/NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.pdf)
337 pages and includes a 16 page index
http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/General/SH_zpsw1psno6c.JPG
Caliban
31st August 2016, 23:58
What's very puzzling is why would they have that guy -- in above video -- play a grieving father AND a national guard soldier? What would be the point of doing that? It seems like the oddest thing.
Kindred
1st September 2016, 01:54
Just happened upon this item on "From the Trenches World Report"
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wolfgang-halbig-coerced-into-removing-sandy-hook-justice-report-website-ceasing-investigation/169298
Seems Wolfgang has been threatened:
"Unknown Parties Give Former Florida State Trooper Written Ultimatum
Wolfgang Halbig has taken his Sandy Hook Justice Report site offline, apparently at the behest of forces not yet named who have vigorously opposed the school safety expert’s continued investigation of the Sandy Hook school massacre event. As of 4:30PM ET Tuesday August 30 the site is no longer available on the web."
IMO... Feels like the 'controllers' think their end-game is near.
But, I also suspect there's more afoot than even THEY think they know.
Humanity has Many Friends
In Unity, Peace and Love
AutumnW
1st September 2016, 03:24
On the other hand, and I am really sorry if this sounds hyper contrary, maybe he was threatened with a law suit by a parent whose child had been killed??
amor
1st September 2016, 05:09
Would someone who has the inside truth on this story please inform those of us who do not know the truth about Sandy Hook what is the REAL truth? Obama is reported to have come out and declared it to have been only an "exercise." Others are treating it as though it really happened. Some say the school had been closed for some time. Which is the truth?
Kindred
1st September 2016, 11:50
I live in CT.. and was traveling past this very location on a daily basis when the event 'happened'. I also have a friend who lives in town.. she said herself, that, about 1/2 hour BEFORE the news 'broke', that she saw about 20 state police cars roaring past her home... NO LIGHTS OR SIRENS.
The school had been closed since 2008, and was in disrepair. You don't and won't Ever see ANY photos of Hundreds of children leaving the school, as There Were None... the few photos available show only one small line of children, and even that photo was cropped to remove the parents, who were standing by watching their children take part in an EXCERSIZE. There's even footage out there that shows around 1 to 3 men being chased through the woods, and there's even one where a man in camo being 'escorted' from the woods, passing by a group of people, saying "I didn't do it."... I remember seeing this very footage the day of the event.
The entire thing was a Staged Event, done at the behest of the US Attorney General, Holden, so as to further the evisceration of the 2nd Amendment, and create fear in the general populace.
Recognize that Everything the 'main-stream' media reports, is a Lie in some fashion, and the only 'way out' is to remain vigilant and cognizant of these facts, and hold Truth and Love in one's heart.
In Unity, Peace and LOVE
AutumnW
1st September 2016, 12:12
Kindred, Do you have any clear proof the school has been closed for that many years? Also, can you think of other explanations as to why police cars would want to remain silent, considering the circumstances? It makes sense to me that the story wouldn't break in real time, that it would take a while for news crews to be 'on it.'
RunningDeer
1st September 2016, 12:27
Nobody Died At Sandy Hook (http://www.naturalnews.com/files/NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.pdf)
337 pages and includes a 16 page index
http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/General/SH_zpsw1psno6c.JPG
Pearls For Swine
1st September 2016, 15:58
I'm sure that 'dead kids' is one of the most sensitive topics but, after having examined the evidence for myself since the time of the 'shooting', I'm pretty convinced that Sandy Hook is a hoax type false flag.
There's just so many inconsistencies. No official records in the government books of the kids having died, evidence of the school having been closed, evidence of a drill with crisis actors,
questionable footage from the news chopper, the extremely questionable testimonies (especially from that actor guy who supposedly gave shelter to a group of kids), etc.
Logically, the burden of proof is always on the positive claim (something happened, vs negative claim- something didn't happen). And I just don't find the evidence convincing that this actually happened.
Why is this in the hoax/ disinformation category? Is it because of James Fetzer?
jimrich
2nd September 2016, 00:26
Like many of you, we have seen bits and pieces of the false flag at Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon and others. Enough for me to make a conscious decision that I need real proof even though my instinct tells me that there is always an agenda to dupe us. This particular video may be 53 min long, but the first 10 min will grab you and the following 20 min knock you sideways. The speaker of this video is well versed, talks no nonsense non stop and bullet points every reason why Sandy Hook was a joke. His documented proof will never be shown on national television but if you are interested, here it is.
When I got excited about 9/11 a few years ago, I began to see all sorts of videos and info that I had no way to confirm or even research so, having now realistic way to prove or examine anything, I finally just gave up and now I feel the same about what James is saying in this video. What am I, a very little ant in a rather large ant hill going to do about our unbelievably corrupt and DANGEROUS governments? I will probably stay withe "just say no" policy and try to avoid getting trapped in the Elite's snares and plots to the best of my ability. Glad I don't have kids to send off to do our government's dirty work! It really is sickening to see just how devious and far reaching our country has gone since the days when we were thought to be heroic and noble - maybe we NEVER WERE! I'm too old and too small to go up against the Super Elite so I'll just stick with "no" for now and hope for the best. I sincerely applaud anyone, like James, who has the courage and resources to EXPOSE the liars and cheats in this or any other government and hope the elite do not have him rubbed out as they surely can in a heartbeat!
In the book: NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY by Gary Allen, the whole scam and drama is pretty well demonstrated so now what????
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5BI7oaJUxc
:Angel:
7alon
3rd September 2016, 12:18
Bloody hell I wish I could remember all of these details off by heart, so I could tell more people about it. I have terrible memory recall and always have to link people to things, which frustrates me because I want to be able to make points from memory :(
onawah
3rd September 2016, 13:48
Simon Parkes in the latest talk with Kerry Cassidy, said that Sandy Hook happened as a cover for the movement of hidden wealth from there to elsewhere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWhGjnIoNw8
AutumnW
3rd September 2016, 15:39
If Sandy Hook is a hoax, I've gotta say, the U.S is not only more screwed up than I imagined but more screwed up, weird, and strange than I could possibly imagine! I am open on the subject, just seeking prosaic explanations that might truly explain, not 'explain away.'
ThePythonicCow
6th September 2016, 15:17
What's very puzzling is why would they have that guy -- in above video -- play a grieving father AND a national guard soldier? What would be the point of doing that? It seems like the oddest thing.
They don't want to fool all of the people, all of the time.
They want to only fool some of the people, some of the time.
That way, and also with the addition of various false or half true clues and conflicting scenarios, they (the elite bastards) encourage confusing, complicated, ever changing conspiracy theory discussions, that raise the anxiety level and lower the awareness of the sheeple, that will hide any legitimate clues that leak out in the "fog of war", and that will energize potential defensive or retaliatory responses from the sheeple, the better to suppress or misdirect such responses.
Akasha
1st October 2016, 16:18
Just released, the second edition of Sandyhoaxed - a great compilation of all of the bizarre tv footage on the subject:
9yMdynxBDVQ
Akasha
3rd October 2017, 22:54
Sandy hook investigator, Wolfgang Halbig is being sued by "parent" of "victim" Noah Posner to the tune of $50 000 000 and will therefore be taking the opportunity to expose many of the anomolies inherent within the psy-op in a Florida court of law. Looking forward to hearing the outcome. Here's a recent interview where he goes into more detail:
rVwYM7GPTU0
Cidersomerset
25th October 2017, 20:06
http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.21.31/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png
Sandy Hook shootings: Four things revealed by FBI files
4 hours ago
From the section US & Canada
https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/4107/production/_98474661_gettyimages-180955216.jpg
Amongst those killed were 20 children aged six and seven years old
Almost five years on, the FBI has declassified 1,500 pages relating
to the Sandy Hook school shootings in Newtown, Connecticut.
Adam Lanza killed 20 elementary school children, six adults and his
mother on 14 December 2012 before turning the gun on himself.
While details of 20-year-old Lanza's declining mental health were
already known, new details about the attack and his possible motive
have been revealed within the still heavily censored documents.
The FBI's behaviour analysis unit concluded in its report that evidence
suggested "the shooter had an interest in children that could be
categorised as paedophilia" before his attack on the school.
Other new revelations include further details on Lanza's online behaviour
and his intense obsession with mass shootings before he carried out one
of the worst in US history.
read more....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41749336
===================================================
===================================================
FBI releases Sandy Hook massacre investigation documents
mSyDkCCYp-g
Published on 25 Oct 2017
Agency releases over 1,500 pages of documents related to the 2012 deadly
rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
Cidersomerset
25th October 2017, 20:18
In this vid they go over some of the docs released
FBI Declassifies Over 1,500 Documents On Sandy Hook Massacre
Z47ZVB5SW6U
Published on 24 Oct 2017
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA ➜ https://goo.gl/ctZVpw
Over 1500 documents pertaining to the Sandy Hook shooting have just been
released by the FBI. I witness accounts as well as interviews with neighbours
and schoolmates of Adam Lanza have all been recorded and is included in this
release although much of the information has been heavily redacted. The
release of the Sandy Hook documents comes just days before the CIA is set to
release the remaining classified JFK files. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For
Truth points out that this is no coincidence and that the intelligence communities
now seem to be setting their sights on anyone who researches and exposes false
flag operation such as the Kennedy assassination false flag and the Sandy Hook
shooting false flag.
TargeT
25th October 2017, 20:35
I've worn tactical gear before... and carried rifles. a fully loaded m16 is around 9lbs loaded with a 30 round mag, body armor weighs around 25-40lbs (depending on type), each loaded 30rnd mag is around 2lbs... My "full rattle" combat kit weighed about 60lbs and I only carried 1 m16 and 1 M9 (M9 weighs 3ish lbs fully loaded) body armor and 120 rounds (4 loaded mags) plus my helmet, knife, etc...
I'm 5'11" 205lbs and (at the time) was in pretty good shape; I had difficulty moving quickly with all that gear and felt like a retarded turtle.
This little guy would have been crushed by his own equipment (if we are to believe all we were told). Every time I see the picture I'm reminded of how stupid the story was...
Nasu
25th October 2017, 20:43
I've worn tactical gear before... and carried rifles. a fully loaded m16 is around 9lbs loaded with a 30 round mag, body armor weighs around 40lbs, each loaded 30rnd mag is around 2lbs... My "full rattle" combat kit weighed about 80lbs and I only carried 1 m16 and 1 M9 (M9 weighs 3ish lbs fully loaded).
I'm 210lbs and at the time was in pretty good shape...
This little guy would have been crushed by his own equipment (if we are to believe all we were told). Every time I see the picture I'm reminded of how stupid the story was...
Yup. Never mind his complete accuracy and efficiency of shots. Only problem is no one was seen leaving in any ambulances, just a huge traffic jam, no on site triage, nothing at all to suggest an active shooter but everything to suggest an active drill. So now we find out he was also a pedophile.. A horrid pedophile. More reason to hate him and his heinous acts..
Maybe we should ban pedophiles with body armor and self loading rifles from entering schools? Or just ban schools then we can be sure of children's ongoing safety... N
Cidersomerset
14th November 2017, 20:55
Father of Newtown Victim Speaks Outside Court
Associated Press
d3zOdMflA7s
Published on 14 Nov 2017
Ian Hockley, whose son Dylan was killed in the 2012 Newtown school shooting,
spoke outside the Connecticut Supreme Court after lawyers asked to reinstate a
lawsuit against Remington Arms, the maker of the gun used by shooter Adam
Lanza. (Nov. 14)
Subscribe for more Breaking News: http://smarturl.it/AssociatedPress
============================================
============================================
Sandy Hook Families Take Gun Manufacturer Remington
Outdoor Company To Court | NBC News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGap8zdksRc
Published on 14 Nov 2017
The families of the Sandy Hook Shooting victims are suing the
Remington Outdoor Company over their marketing campaign
for their military-grade weapon that was used in the Sandy
Hook shooting.
================================================
Sandy Hook lawsuit against gunmaker heads to Conn.'s top court
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orh-bte19qA
Published on 14 Nov 2017...CBS
Families of the victims in the Sandy Hook school shooting will take their fight
against gunmakers to the Connecticut Supreme Court on Tuesday. They want to
reinstate a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the automatic weapon that was
used in the 2012 attack. The families claim the company markets its weapons to
young people who could be prone to violence. Don Dahler reports.
TargeT
22nd February 2018, 20:52
Did the SandyHook shooting "victims" sing at the superbowl?
JCOrLxzTrq4
Seems pretty compelling....
Bill Ryan
12th August 2018, 20:57
As the timing of the dumping of Alex Jones has coincided perfectly with the ongoing court case against Alex by the so called Sandy Hook families, I went looking for the documentary called "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook".
Youtube has got rid of it, of course, but I found a copy that's playable from archive dot org.
Here:
https://archive.org/details/HQWeNeedToTalkAboutSandyHookFullVideoInHigherQuality
We also have a copy in the Avalon Library, in medium resolution: (538 Mb)
http://avalonlibrary.net/We_need_to_talk_about_Sandy_Hook.mp4
Valerie Villars
12th August 2018, 21:57
Did the SandyHook shooting "victims" sing at the superbowl?
JCOrLxzTrq4
Seems pretty compelling....
It does seem pretty compelling and with all the research and knowledge I've gathered in the last years, it even seems probable, unfortunately.
Bill Ryan
12th August 2018, 22:29
Sandy hook investigator, Wolfgang Halbig is being sued by "parent" of "victim" Noah Posner to the tune of $50 000 000 and will therefore be taking the opportunity to expose many of the anomolies inherent within the psy-op in a Florida court of law. Looking forward to hearing the outcome. Here's a recent interview where he goes into more detail:
rVwYM7GPTU0
This video has been taken down, as we can see. But it's in the Avalon Library: (51 mins, 112 Mb)
Wolfgang Halbig Sued Over Sandy Hook - Will the Truth Finally Come Out in Court?
http://avalonlibrary.net/Wolfgang_Halbig_Sued_Over_Sandy_Hook_-_Will_the_Truth_Finally_Come_Out_in_Court.mp4
Ba-ba-Ra
12th August 2018, 23:58
I'm not sure what really happened in Sandy Hook, but I'm really sure it's not what they are telling us.
Just as a side note. I was raised in Connecticut. Sandy Hook is a village within the town of Newtown. And Newtown was pretty well known for it's mental institution, which rumor had it, strange things went on. In fact it was a common threat of mothers back in the 40's and 50's that if you didn't behave, they would take you to Newtown.
Even when I was in college in the late 50's those rumors persisted. The college I attended was in Danbury, quite close to Sandy Hook and we would go to Sandy Hook often because of it was on Lake Zoar.
My point: There's been a history of strange goings on in Newtown (Sandy Hook)
Fairfield Hills Hospital was a psychiatric hospital in Newtown, Connecticut, which operated from 1931 until 1995. At its peak, the hospital housed over 4,000 patients.
Arcturian108
13th August 2018, 01:05
Noticing the revival of this thread resulted in my doing a fresh search for Wolfgang Halbig, whom I consistently followed for several years until moving on to other projects in the past few years. I consider him to be very credible since he was in the business of school security. And today I found out online that Leonard Pozner vs. Wolfgang Halbig case was dropped by Pozner a day before it was to go to court. Wolfgang, however, was left with court costs and legal fees to pay, so is possibly counter-suing. My thoughts now about this is that Pozner wants to go after somebody like Alex Jones because of him having deeper pockets and also being a bigger adversary. However, Halbig really has the goods on this, take a look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9BfaUmDOt4
In addition after you see the video, here is a pertinent comment from somebody who worked for Sysco, the school food service that Newtown, CT employed:
Joe Brown, 1 month ago (edited):
"I called Wolfgang we spoke for a half hour, I felt compelled to because I worked for SYSCO for 3 years. In conclusion no food equals no children eating, equals no school on Dickenson operating . Meaning NO shooting. Phony fake show"
A Voice from the Mountains
13th August 2018, 01:10
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA ➜ https://goo.gl/ctZVpw
Over 1500 documents pertaining to the Sandy Hook shooting have just been
released by the FBI. I witness accounts as well as interviews with neighbours
and schoolmates of Adam Lanza have all been recorded and is included in this
release although much of the information has been heavily redacted. The
release of the Sandy Hook documents comes just days before the CIA is set to
release the remaining classified JFK files. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For
Truth points out that this is no coincidence and that the intelligence communities
now seem to be setting their sights on anyone who researches and exposes false
flag operation such as the Kennedy assassination false flag and the Sandy Hook
shooting false flag.
I interpret this as signaling from the Trump administration that they are going to dump the guts on this operation just as they are going to drop the guts of the JFK assassination.
The Great Awakening. :)
Caliban
13th August 2018, 02:28
Here's Halbig with John Wells from a few months back.
_7vnpo6yLEM
I'm quite surprised that's still there. He's always very convincing. Interesting that his case was dropped yet they're going after Jones. Why is that? Because they know he won't call someone like Halbig to testify!? That whole thing doesn't smell good, and here's Wolf's opinion of AJ:
T8sjuY3PS_8
Such a shame that so many hours of hard work was removed, videos from HowIsee The World (Robin something) and that Australian bloke, Peekay. After watching their videos and listening to Wolfgang, the emperor was really looking pretty damn bare.
Bill Ryan
13th August 2018, 02:59
Interesting that his [Halbig's] case was dropped yet they're going after Jones. Why is that?
There was way too much that was VERY significant and embarrassing (and would have been widely reported) that would have come out in court.
norman
13th August 2018, 09:38
Interesting that his [Halbig's] case was dropped yet they're going after Jones. Why is that?
There was way too much that was VERY significant and embarrassing (and would have been widely reported) that would have come out in court.
And . . . as soon as Alex Jones took a lawyer's advice to back off and go the apology route, they then had a clear path to go after him because his trial wouldn't throw up dirt.
Arcturian108
11th September 2018, 17:41
Folks,
I was listening to this audio two days ago and noted that Wolfgang gave out his phone number to the listening audience:
https://www.real.video/5812156221001
So I called him yesterday and he returned my call. We chatted for some time and he brought me up to date about what is going on. He is a defendant in a new court case brought to Connecticut by some of the parents, but he is quite happy that it has been turned over to the federal court system, rather than the state court system. However, he can't afford an attorney to work with him, and plans to represent himself. During the call I gave him an energy healing which he greatly appreciated, and I plan to help him in all the ways that I know how.
For those who wish to speak with him his number is 352.729.2559. He can use both financial and legal help.
Hervé
6th October 2018, 15:39
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1790281240/henry-makow_bigger.jpg Henry Makow @HenryMakow (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow)
Wolfgang Halbig Wins Sandy Hook Lawsuit! on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/29261796 (https://t.co/4CH8Zcdmkg)
4:09 PM - 5 Oct 2018
3 replies 3 retweets 22 likes
===========================================
Well, apparently the video has been scrubbed:
https://vimeo.com/29261796
Bill Ryan
6th October 2018, 15:52
Wolfgang Halbig Wins Sandy Hook Lawsuit! on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/29261796 (https://t.co/4CH8Zcdmkg)
4:09 PM - 5 Oct 2018
Well, apparently the video has been scrubbed:
This'll be it, I think: (There seemed to be a missing final digit in the URL ^^)
https://vimeo.com/292617969
Bill Ryan
6th October 2018, 18:34
This may be interesting to many. At 14:55 in the above new interview (https://player.vimeo.com/video/292617969), Wolfgang Halbig recounts his in-depth conversation with Alex Jones.... who later publicly changed his tune. Do listen.
onawah
7th October 2018, 05:54
Bill, any idea why Jones changed his tune?
(I listened to some of the interview and as I recall, what Halbig said was that Jones actually denied what he had originally said.)
This may be interesting to many. At 14:55 in the above new interview (https://player.vimeo.com/video/292617969), Wolfgang Halbig recounts his in-depth conversation with Alex Jones.... who later publicly changed his tune. Do listen.
Bill Ryan
7th October 2018, 14:29
Bill, any idea why Jones changed his tune?
(I listened to some of the interview and as I recall, what Halbig said was that Jones actually denied what he had originally said.)
This may be interesting to many. At 14:55 in the above new interview (https://player.vimeo.com/video/292617969), Wolfgang Halbig recounts his in-depth conversation with Alex Jones.... who later publicly changed his tune. Do listen.Bill, any idea why Jones changed his tune?
(I listened to some of the interview and as I recall, what Halbig said was that Jones actually denied what he had originally said.)
It's a really important question, and it needs an answer.
I don't believe (as Halbig accuses) that Alex is part of a cover-up. One can only guess he's been seriously threatened or coerced (maybe in other ways than physically) or has in some way done a deal, i.e. made some agreement. It's hard to understand, and it really bothers me.
I do know there are many who blithely write off Alex as being a shill or a plant. They say so in single sentences containing half a dozen words. It's rarely intelligently discussed. Alex's sincerity and passion over many issues are self-evident — it clearly seems to me.
In some way, it may conceivably be linked to Israel (go figure) — about which Alex has always been a far-from-convincing apologist. Alex feels the real threat to us all is China, and has consistently stated that. Recent events show he may have been right all along.
My summary: I don't know what happened behind the scenes. But something did, and I'm disturbed by what I heard Halbig say.
Magnus
7th October 2018, 17:47
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1790281240/henry-makow_bigger.jpg Henry Makow @HenryMakow (https://twitter.com/HenryMakow)
Wolfgang Halbig Wins Sandy Hook Lawsuit! on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/292617969 (https://t.co/4CH8Zcdmkg)
4:09 PM - 5 Oct 2018
===========================================
https://vimeo.com/292617969
I'm not ok with Wolfgang Halbig talking over Alex Jones head like that, Jones got to have earned his right to take Wolfgang Halbig's words face to face.
T Smith
9th October 2018, 02:16
Bill, any idea why Jones changed his tune?
It's quite simple, in my estimation. Sandy Hook proved to be Jones' "third rail", what they finally got him on. The PTB literally took Jones down over Sandy Hook; now he's trying to walk it back the best way he can so not to discredit in the hearts and minds of the broader audience that he's not a complete charlatan. His stance on Sandy Hook set the stage for the perfect straw man. The only way to defend himself is to tear down the straw man by walking back his initial claims.
For those of you who may not recognize the bigger picture; Alex Jones is no Richie Allen, or any other internet personality flying under the radar. The smaller your audience, the bolder and more true to message you can be. Once your audience starts to compete with the mainstream, deadly voltage flows through every third rail you cover.
Every single smear piece on Jones continued to bring up Sandy Hook -- relentlessly. He literally didn't have the resources or wit to defend his initial position; whatever he said just made him look worse. This single news story is literally is the reason AJ has become a "non-person", is banned on Facebook, Instagram, from the Apple Store, etc. As long as they can contain AJ, like Richie Allen, he can talk and cover whatever he wants. But once his message transcends the world of the alternative, no so much.
Unfortunately for Alex, he stepped on it with Sandy Hook, and it contained deadly voltage.
onawah
10th October 2018, 03:02
I'm not a fan of Jones, though I know he has disseminated a lot of good information. I am interested in the information, but listening to Jones gives me a psychic headache, so I usually only hear it second hand.
But I am curious--did it go like this?:
Jones reported on Sandy Hook and said it looked like a false flag event. But evidence turned up demonstrating that there actually were some deaths, and a grieving parent took Jones to task.
The public outrage was so great (whether real or manufactured) that Jones tried to ameliorate the situation by admitting he could have been wrong, choosing not to get in any deeper as it looked like a lost cause.
(Explaining that some of the deaths could have been real even though some were obviously faked would only cause more outrage because it would stretch people's incredulity too far, and Deep State controllers would fan the flames.)
Jones was caught between a rock and a hard place and any backtracking only made him look worse. He was attacked both for his original statement and for his backtracking.
If that's how it went, then it's doubly sad because there was so much evidence presented by whistleblowers that Sandy Hook really was a false flag, even though it may have been the case that some sacrificial lambs were actually slaughtered to throw truth seekers off the track.
(Only making it all the more heinous an event...)
thepainterdoug
10th October 2018, 03:40
(Only making it all the more heinous an event...)
ONAWAH/ how true. and if some sacrificed, who were there architects of this event ? this event was truly disturbing as there is so much that doesn't work. and how do we know there were truly deaths? were there legit death certificates? are death certificates not public domain?
onawah
10th October 2018, 04:09
There are members on the forum who are much more knowledgeable about Sandy Hook and the repercussions than I am, who might venture to answer your queries, Doug, and this thread is very informative, if any care to read it from start to finish.
It's certainly very disturbing!
(Only making it all the more heinous an event...)
ONAWAH/ how true. and if some sacrificed, who were there architects of this event ? this event was truly disturbing as there is so much that doesn't work. and how do we know there were truly deaths? were there legit death certificates? are death certificates not public domain?
thepainterdoug
13th October 2018, 01:17
http://memoryholeblog.org/2018/10/12/fake-news-events-and-federal-hseep-drills/
New on Professor James Tracys site. Has crisis actor form as well
Hervé
7th January 2019, 19:05
From Wolfgang Halbig about Gugsa Abraham (Abe) Dabela’s death:
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1591125736/wolfgang_official_photo_bigger.jpg Wolfgang W. Halbig @halbigW (https://twitter.com/halbigW)
@newtgingrich (https://twitter.com/newtgingrich) Abe and I spoke three days before he died. He called to ask questions about Sandy Hook and he was so afraid that he used a Burner phone. He asked me to buy one so nobody could hear us discussing Sandy Hook School Shooting I went in fear mode
0CS-eORZNJM
Lawyer Investigating Sandy Hook Shooting Found Dead. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=0CS-eORZNJM)
https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AAuE7mCslLnWeBVAJSWZyxsDuNN2ecABTQ8bvE6xTg=s48-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQl1pCXAUdAf3hXK5d7qG_g) News For You (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQl1pCXAUdAf3hXK5d7qG_g) Published on Jul 28, 2017
A lawyer who was investigating the Sandy Hook shooting was found dead in his overturned car. Police ruled Gugsa Abraham (Abe) Dabela’s death as a suicide despite a gunshot wound to the back of his head and “footprints” on his back.
5:49 AM - 7 Jan 2019
0 replies 9 retweets 4 likes
Abe was pronounced dead at the scene (http://www.justice4abe.com/case-background/) at 2:11 a.m. on April 5, 2014 of a gunshot wound to the back, right side of his head.
===========================================
Makes perfect sense... right?
Valerie Villars
7th January 2019, 19:32
I have a problem with the way that video is read and printed.
The speaker sounds like a computerized voice and he pronounced CT (short for Connecticut) as court.
He said shoot when the screen words said shot.
There was another one I can't remember and I'm not done with the video. While I have no doubt people are killed every day for exposing agendas, I am wondering if you have any familiarity with the source of this story.
Edit: I see a number of credible news stories have reported on his death.
Hervé
7th January 2019, 19:41
I have a problem with the way that video is read and printed.
[...]
I solved that problem by quitting watching/listening to it :)
The point is not the video but the conversation between Newt (or Halbig?) and Abe asking questions about Sandy Hook via a burner phone; 3 days before being eliminated.
Bill Ryan
16th March 2019, 01:47
When going through this thread, I saw that several important videos have been removed from YouTube for 'bullying and harassment'. (OMG.)
So here they are, in the Avalon Library:
We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook
http://avalonlibrary.net/Sandy_Hook/We_need_to_talk_about_Sandy_Hook.mp4
Sofia Smallstorm - Unraveling Sandy Hook
http://avalonlibrary.net/Sandy_Hook/Sofia_Smallstorm_Unraveling_Sandy_Hook.mp4
Sandy Hook - The Documentary (Part 1)
http://avalonlibrary.net/Sandy_Hook/Sandy_Hook_The_Documentary_(Part_1).mp4
Sandy Hook - The Documentary (Part 2)
http://avalonlibrary.net/Sandy_Hook/Sandy_Hook_The_Documentary_(Part_2).mp4
Bill Ryan
16th March 2019, 02:13
In searching for a good summary article, I found this and can highly recommend it. Do note that some of the links no longer work, and many if not all of the YouTube videos have been removed. (See the post above (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?53271-What-Really-Happened-at-Sandy-Hook&p=1281051&viewfull=1#post1281051) for the most important ones, all archived.)
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/sandy-hook-3rd-anniversary-hoodwinked
Sandy Hoodwinked: Sandy Hook 3rd Anniversary – 33 Unanswered Questions
14 December, 2015
As the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary rolls around this December 14th, 2015, it is well worth remembering what a strange, unique, manipulative and horrific event occurred on December 14th, 2012. When I say horrific, I am not referring to what you may think was the horrific aspect of the event: the gunning down of 20 innocent children and 6 innocent adults. That is unquestionably horrific, but to date there has hardly been enough evidence to prove beyond all doubt that actual people were gunned down.
Sandy Hook has become colloquially known as the Sandy Hook Hoax or Sandy Hoax, the first false flag in recent history to be exposed as an entirely fabricated event, replete with a fake setting (a fake school) and fake victims. It marks the first in a series of false flag hoaxes where fake victims and fake victims’ families (crisis actors) have been used. Since the majority of people still cannot fathom that Sandy Hook was a staged event, the template of using crisis actors has been used again and again (e.g. at the Boston Marathon). Now that we are passing the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary, it’s time to turn back the clock and re-examine some unanswered questions pertaining to the event.
By the way, if you think Sandy Hook no longer matters, ask yourself why Amazon (on behalf of the US Government) felt so scared it had to engage in censorship by trying to ban Jim Fetzer’s book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (available for free here (http://www.rense.com/general96/NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.pdf)). Sandy Hook is still very relevant, because it was a scam of massive proportions. Take a look how many false flag mass shootings are still being carried out monthly and even weekly (e.g. Paris (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/paris-shooting-10-signs-false-flag/), San Bernardino (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/san-bernardino-mass-shooting-shooter-drill/)) to terrorize the public, push gun control and achieve other political and geopolitical aims.
Sandy Hook: 33 Unanswered Questions
There are still some who cannot bring themselves to believe that criminal elements within the US Government could pull off a false flag hoax like this. Yet, it must be remembered that in this day and age it is all too easy to fake photographic and video evidence. Photoshop and other software programs allow the user to construct any kind of photo they want. If you want to know some of the truth about what really happened at Sandy Hook, 2 of the best documentaries (out of many) that expose the absurdity of the official narrative and provide alternative theories are We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxTafqejV6k) (various independent media analysts) and Unraveling Sandy Hook (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1yfJDCMU64) (Sofia Smallstorm).
Here is a list of 33 unanswered questions about Sandy Hook:
Sandy Hook: Foreknowledge and Preparation
1. Why was a FaceBook webpage (http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/01/08/sandy-hook-ripdonation-webpages-created-before-the-massacre/) for the alleged dead teacher Victoria Soto of Sandy Hook Elementary School posted before the event occurred?
2. Why was the United Way charity webpage (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/sandy-hook-foreknowledge/) for Sandy Hook posted before the event occurred?
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Sandy-Hook.png
Google caught evidence of foreknowledge: this United Way charity website page was launched on Dec. 11th, 2012, a full 3 days before the mass shooting at Sandy Hook actually occurred!
3. How did the Arlington Red Devils website (http://nodisinfo.com/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/) post the book on Talking With Children/Students About the Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting on 12/10/2012 (which was contained in the page url), 4 days before the event occurred? If this were some kind of technical glitch, then how did Google’s bots manage to record a cached page for 12/13/2012, still 1 day before the Sandy Hook shooting happened?
4. How did John Trentacosta (http://www.insanemedia.net/sandy-hook-trentacostas-and-the-united-way/4645) (whose house was next to the Lanzas with a lot of activity occurring there at the time), who was CEO of the local Newton bank, start a victims’ fund on the same day so quickly after the event, after receiving in his words “countless requests” to do so? Is it just a coincidence that Trentacosta was also a member of a new council of the New York Federal Reserve, the Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council?
5. According to various researchers, why was the Newtown community seeded with new families in the years leading up to the event?
6. According to Wolfgang Halbig (http://sandyhookjusticereport.com), why were 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shooting?
Sandy Hook: Media Switching Stories
7. Why did the media keep switching its narrative (http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/10/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax/) as the story unfolded regarding the actual weapon used? Finally they settled upon a rifle. But how could a rifle kill 26 people in such quick succession?
Sandy Hook: Inconsistencies with Witness Stories
8. Why did known actor and Sandy Hook witness Gene Rosen keep changing his story about how he encountered the 6 kids who allegedly came to him? In different interviews he variously claims he found the kids just after feeding his cats in the loft, just after going to breakfast and just after coming home from breakfast. His testimony completely conflicts with that of the school bus driver and the official report. There is also video of him near the fire house walking around slowly (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HkAvCJLTRs), plus a video of him rehearsing his lines (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igfczc6m5M4) with the cameraman …
Sandy Hook: Lack Of Evidence
9. How was a skinny 19-year-old boy with no military training capable of killing 26 people clean while injuring none? (Trained military veterans have claimed it was highly unlikely or even impossible for someone with the weight of Adam Lanza to execute that many people in so short a time.)
10. Why was there no evidence of blood? A total of 26 fatalities (children and adult) would produce at least at a conservative estimate 20 gallons (75 liters) of blood. Thus would require a concerted blood cleanup (blood is considered a biohazard in this type of situation), yet when Sofia Smallstorm asked who did the cleanup, all the departments were ignorant of it and even claimed that no one did the cleanup.
11. Where are the alleged 600+ children of Sandy Hook Elementary School? Why is there absolutely no photo or video evidence of any dead bodies? Why did coroner and chief medical examiner Wayne Carver say the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVLCSqoZYqY)?
“Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—”
12. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no social security numbers for the dead students?
13. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no report of actual shots fired?
14. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the Sandy Hook shooting crime not exist on the FBI 2012 crime report?
15. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the tax accessor’s website shows the victims’ families got free houses on Christmas day when all Government offices are closed? This video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRqLV4DiQRE) shows many Sandy Hook “victim’s” families having their mortgages magically paid off on 12/25/2009!
16. Why were all the ambulances parked at the fire house away from the crime scene (except one on Dickinson Dr. which was also too far removed to be helpful)? Why were so few EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians) allowed in the school?
Sandy Hook: Faked Photos and Evidence of a Drill
17. Why does the iconic image of the teacher leading kids out of school contain evidence of Photoshop doctoring and fakery?
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/sandy-hook-false-flag-hoax-iconic-image-faked.jpeg
18. Why does the Sandy Hook Timeline of Evacuation not match the video evidence (http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2014/03/sandy-hook-police-official-timeline.html) from the trooper’s car stationed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School car park?
19. Why was there a big electronic sign erected at the entrance to the Sandy Hook Elementary school stating “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN” if the event were real and not a drill?
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/sandy-hook-drill-everyone-must-check-in.jpeg (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/sandy-hook-drill-everyone-must-check-in.jpeg)
20. Why was there an active shooter drill at around the same place and the same time (http://leaksource.info/2013/01/17/active-shooter-drill-same-timeday-as-sandy-hook-shootings/) as the Sandy Hook event? Every recent false flag since at least 9/11 has had this element.
21. Why are people walking around the Sandy Hook fire house in circles like a movie set (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZRa5_DHgl4)? Why was there such a lack of urgency in the emergency personnel who were responding for many hours after 10am when people were still unaccounted for (e.g. nurse Sally Cox who claims she hid in a closet for 4 hours until 1:15pm)?
Sandy Hook: Coverup
22. If Sandy Hook Elementary School was a legitimate and operational school at the time of the event, why is there evidence that the school shut in 2009 due to asbestos, was reinspected in 2011, and was flooded again with Hurricanes Irene and Sandy? We know FEMA and the US Federal Government supplied money to Newtown to revitalize it. Why does the local business Apex Glass claim they were using the school premises for their glass business (apologies but the interview revealing this information has been taken down by YouTube [https://youtube.com/watch?v=M9vLEzNsI00])?
23. Why were the entire school grounds of what we were told was “Sandy Hook Elementary School” demolished (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/10/15/sandy-hook-demolition-crew-sworn-to-silence/) and rebuilt? Does this remind you of how the metal scraps from 9/11 were immediately shipped off to China before they could be examined for evidence?
24. Why did Newtown Town Clerk Debbie Aurelia and Connecticut State Attorney Kevin Kane refuse to release the death certificates and the names of the “victims”? Why did Connecticut officials conspire to pass an unprecedented bill banning FOIA requests and access to death certificates and other information, normally part of the public record as a matter of course for centuries? Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy signed the bill (http://www.vosizneias.com/132573/2013/06/05/hartford-ct-conn-gov-signs-bill-restricting-newtown-photos/) on June 5th, 2013.
25. Why were there so many black and silver (Government-type) cars around the school and fire house in place before the event?
26. According to Sofia Smallstorm, why were the exact number (26) of Christmas trees for the memorial already sitting outside the fire house before the event occurred?
27. Why do so many of the victims’ family members appear to be acting, smirking, giggling, snickering and outright laughing after the event, such as Robbie Parker (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVbwG8_qloA)?
Sandy Hook: Strange Comments by Officials
28. How does one explain the highly strange behavior of coroner Wayne Carver (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVLCSqoZYqY)? Why did Carver say that “you can control a situation depending on your photographer, and I have very good photographers”? Why did Carver say that “I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their heads later”?
29. Why did Lieutenant Paul Vance threaten to prosecute as a crime anyone who reported information that contradicted the official narrative (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMubAkg4ATI)?
30. Why did the Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIeO1tEdJNc) say that “The Lieutenant Governor and I have been spoken to in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state”?
Sandy Hook: Aftermath
31. Why did no one sue the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza?
32. How is it that no parent wanted to see the dead bodies of their children in the school?
33. Why were all the funerals conducted with closed caskets?
Conclusion: Sandy Hook – The Template for the False Flag Hoax
Sandy Hook smells rotten, and just as 9/11 was a template and justification for future transgressions against liberty, so too was Sandy Hook to become the template for the false flag hoax. Let us always remember what happened and continue to investigate it, so that future false flag events, and false flag hoax events, can be quickly spotted.
*****
Sources:
http://rense.com/general96/NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.pdf
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IxTafqejV6k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxTafqejV6k)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=m1yfJDCMU64 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1yfJDCMU64)
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/01/08/sandy-hook-ripdonation-webpages-created-before-the-massacre/
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/sandy-hook-foreknowledge/
http://nodisinfo.com/sandy-hook-treachery-confirmed/
http://insanemedia.net/sandy-hook-trentacostas-and-the-united-way/4645
http://sandyhookjusticereport.com
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/10/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax/
https://youtube.com/watch?v=1HkAvCJLTRs
https://youtube.com/watch?v=igfczc6m5M4
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/newtown-connecticut-school-shooting-sandy-hook-nurse-hid-17997111
https://youtube.com/watch?v=DVLCSqoZYqY
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HRqLV4DiQRE
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2014/03/sandy-hook-police-official-timeline.html
http://leaksource.info/2013/01/17/active-shooter-drill-same-timeday-as-sandy-hook-shootings/
https://youtube.com/watch?v=TZRa5_DHgl4
http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/10/15/sandy-hook-demolition-crew-sworn-to-silence/
http://vosizneias.com/132573/2013/06/05/hartford-ct-conn-gov-signs-bill-restricting-newtown-photos/
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nVbwG8_qloA
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wMubAkg4ATI
https://youtube.com/watch?v=NIeO1tEdJNc
Rosemarie
25th March 2019, 16:52
I am new here and haven’t master how to put videos or links..... but I just read one of the fathers of one of the victims was found dead today outside Edmond Town Hall in Newtown. Apparently suicide. His name is Jeremy Richman and he was the father of a girl named Avielle. It is all over the news.
waree
25th March 2019, 18:08
There you go the link to Video of the father of Sandy Hook student suicide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJfXmSH3qo
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/us/sandy-hook-victim-father-jeremy-richman-suicide/index.html
Also the Sandy Hook's shooter psychiatrist arrested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiiXGEHBO_E&t=1115s
Two Parkland school shooting survivors suicide within a week!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3EzhX44vRE
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/24/parkland-suicide-second-parkland-survivor-week-takes-own-life/3261734002/
What's going on?!!?
:facepalm:
A Voice from the Mountains
25th March 2019, 18:14
Yes, a lot of suspicious "suicides" lately.
First two Parkland students, and now this guy from Sandy Hook, and he was found dead inside of town hall at Newtown! I posted about it on this thread here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106416-Active-Shooter-Drill-for-Parkland&p=1282599&viewfull=1#post1282599).
He also has connections to Big Pharma, apparently was a brain scientist interested in violent behavior.
David Hogg even seems to have been doing public damage control beforehand by asserting that all the survivors were suddenly under a lot of stress down there. These people are sick.
Chanie
25th March 2019, 18:49
As Vincent Kennedy says, “Expect them to try to Clean Up.”
See:https://mobile.twitter.com/VincentCrypt46/status/1110222547973492736
A Voice from the Mountains
25th March 2019, 19:21
The NSA has everything and always has. And they work with patriots in the US military, not the globalist CIA and its international partners in crime. Once the door is opened for NSA and military intelligence to be introduced into a court of law, all the additional crimes they are committing right now and just going to damn them that much more. They know it is coming and that's why they're freaking out like this.
norman
26th March 2019, 03:12
I'm not going back through 46 pages of this thread to check if it's been posted here before but I just came across this image.
Where the hell did that image vanish too !
[ oh, it's back !]
Paul [or anyone]: When an image cannot be found at the linked address, does the entire reference to it vanish, as has happened here ?
https://vgy.me/G9I5qK.jpg
Gemma13
26th March 2019, 03:43
What the ……???????? The following links show photos of same boy from Norman's post above.
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/141228/world-neighbours/article/pakistan-school-massacre-probe-afghan-canteen-staffers-held
Tributes being paid to the victims of the brazen Peshawar school massacre (Photo: AP)
https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/cdn.deccanchronicle.com/sites/default/files/peshawar%20school%20attack%20tribute%20ap_0.jpg
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/16/remembering-the-victims-of-the-sandy-hook-elementary-school-shooting/
Remembering the Victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting
https://timenewsfeed.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/nf-sandy-hook-victims-1217.jpg?w=720&h=480&crop=1
RunningDeer
3rd April 2019, 13:02
I'm not going back through 46 pages of this thread to check if it's been posted here before but I just came across this image.
Your image comes up now. Initially it didn't. I'll add another smaller version here just in case. Maybe the company that hosts the image was quirky for a bit?
https://i.imgur.com/657nUks.jpg
thepainterdoug
3rd April 2019, 15:25
one of the many mysteries and inconsistencies to this story
Akasha
10th April 2019, 18:33
YouTube channel Blackstone Intelligence Network just did a hit piece on Wolfgang Halbig, just two days after Alex Jones' Sandy Hook deposition was uploaded where Jones agreed with the prosecuting attorney that Halbig was a "cook".
Here's a response:
xERkqPkspaY
I'm not 100% sure but I think the presenter may be the same person who did the research into all the properties sold for $0 in Newtown around the time of the event.
Akasha
24th April 2019, 21:45
Wolfgang did a 2 hour interview with Nathan from Lift the Veil on the 12th of April. I only just came across it now. In it he addresses the lawsuit led by Lenny Pozner, the accusations, slurs and much more. This guy just keeps on rockin'. All power to him!
wjfIp4MwizQ
Edit: Given the way YouTube is behaving at the moment, is it possible to add this video to the library?
Bill Ryan
27th April 2019, 12:40
Wolfgang did a 2 hour interview with Nathan from Lift the Veil on the 12th of April. I only just came across it now. In it he addresses the lawsuit led by Lenny Pozner, the accusations, slurs and much more. This guy just keeps on rockin'. All power to him!
wjfIp4MwizQ
Edit: Given the way YouTube is behaving at the moment, is it possible to add this video to the library?
~~~
Sure, now here. It's definitely a candidate for being taken down.
http://avalonlibrary.net/Wolfgang_Halbig%2C_12_April_2019_The_Sandy_Hook_Trial.mp4 (240 Mb)
Smell the Roses
27th April 2019, 14:35
Well if this boy being killed both at Sandy Hook and in Pakistan isn't "Hiding In Plain Sight", I don't know what is. The Sandy Hook incident was what got me off of mainstream media for good (except for as amusement, certainly not as an information source). I already had gone through recognizing the frauds of the JFK assassination and 9/11/01 (among others), and I was so angry that they fooled me with this Sandy Hook nonsense for a couple of days. We got rid of satellite TV after that and haven't looked back.
This is another case where if someone wants to believe the mainstream story, logic will rarely get them to budge. I suppose if somehow they are forced to confront the myriad of inconsistencies and downright falsehoods surrounding the Connecticut drill, it could become a watershed incident for someone to recognize that the government doesn't have our best interests at heart.
Akasha
7th July 2019, 13:16
As Youtube increasingly tightens its grip on dissemination of truth, 153news.net (https://153news.net/) picks up the baton and runs with it proper! I would recommend everyone visit the site and show it some love. God knows it's needed now more than ever.
(mods: would it be possible to have a 153news.net embed button like for YT?)
JIM FETZER "Truth vs New$,Inc" (6-17-19) Sandy Hook book court case. hr.1 (https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=9AB4SA5XHOG5)
JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (6-19-19) Jim discusses his loss in Dane County Circuit Court (https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=42B7D975KX69)
JIM FETZER "The Raw Deal" (6-26-19) Sandy Hook "Pozner v. Fetzer" lawsuit,attempt to implicate Iran (https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=K2G8X1A7KMM9)
JIM FETZER "Michael Decon" (6-29-19) Sandy Hook lawsuit and manner in which it was handled (https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=K2G8X1A7KMM9)
Bill Ryan
7th July 2019, 15:38
(mods: would it be possible to have a 153news.net embed button like for YT?)
Sadly, right now we're stuck with the video embed code options that we have. Ilie Pandia had to do some clever work 18 months ago to engineer even Vimeo videos to be embeddable. (The announcement is here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100492-Embedding-VIMEO-videos-will-work-now.&p=1210642#post1210642).)
My guess (senior admin Tommy would know, and we'll definitely ask) is that only the most recent version of vBulletin, our forum software, would have the embed codes for the newer video platforms. (Or plugins might be available, but almost certainly not for our very old version.)
ExomatrixTV
6th April 2022, 02:19
624cd547bc0dcd52c20339d0
source (https://api.banned.video/embed/624cd547bc0dcd52c20339d0)
holcaul
20th May 2022, 14:09
I have always wondered. Why is the Sandy Hook topic so taboo. Even in alternative media, it is not much talked about. Every other shooting or conspiracy has its share of airtime, but Sandy Hook has always been very taboo to discuss. Is it just me or there is something especially weird with Sandy Hook?
Of all the things Alex Jones said over the years, Sandy Hook was the thing that got him deplatformed and a major lawsuit on his hands that forced him to walk back on his position.
Is it because “they” really dropped the ball on their execution of the Sandy Hook psyop? Or is it that they revealed too much of the black magic/satanic ritualism through this psyop, they were too transparent?
Am I the only one who feels that way?
Delight
20th May 2022, 14:38
I have always wondered. Why is the Sandy Hook topic so taboo. Even in alternative media, it is not much talked about. Every other shooting or conspiracy has its share of airtime, but Sandy Hook has always been very taboo to discuss. Is it just me or there is something especially weird with Sandy Hook?
Of all the things Alex Jones said over the years, Sandy Hook was the thing that got him deplatformed and a major lawsuit on his hands that forced him to walk back on his position.
Is it because “they” really dropped the ball on their execution of the Sandy Hook psyop? Or is it that they revealed too much of the black magic/satanic ritualism through this psyop, they were too transparent?
Am I the only one who feels that way?
I think that Sandy Hook is NOT at all what was presented. I still think this is the best video I saw about the "reality created"
tFd5xSkSkCXb/
onawah
4th August 2022, 23:21
Alex Jones must pay at least $4.1 million to parents of a Sandy Hook school massacre victim in defamation case, jury rules
By Safia Samee Ali
8/4/22
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alex-jones-must-pay-41-million-parents-sandy-hook-school-massacre-vict-rcna41493
"Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose son Jesse died in the 2012 attack, had sought damages for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
An Austin jury on Thursday decided Infowars host Alex Jones must pay at least $4.1 million to the family of a 6-year-old killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting for the suffering he and his website and broadcast caused them by spreading lies about the 2012 massacre.
Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose son Jesse died alongside 19 of his classmates and six educators at the school in Newtown, Connecticut, had sought $150 million for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
An attorney for Jones, who has repeatedly suggested that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, asked jurors to award Heslin and Lewis only $1.
The jury was only asked to decide whether Jones, who has already been found liable by a judge because he did not hand over critical evidence before the trial began, must also pay Jesse's parents for the emotional distress and reputational damage caused by his false claims. The jury will also decide whether to award punitive damages. The panel will hear testimony on that subject Friday.
The trial included testimony from both parents and Jones, who has portrayed the lawsuit as an attack on his First Amendment rights. Following the shooting, he had asserted that it was fabricated and included crisis actors. He later acknowledged that it took place.
His attorney, Andino Reynal, argued that Jones has paid for his mistake by losing millions of followers after he was removed from social media platforms in 2018.
“He made a terrible mistake,” Reynal told jurors, referring to Jones. “That mistake was weaponized by the same political forces that had descended upon Sandy Hook when it happened.” "
(It sounds like Alex Jones really dug himself into a deep hole (possibly including perjury) with this trial.)
oioJoodTT2A
9Juv25ZUEu0
Also posted here:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113363-BREAKING-NEWS-Continuously-Updated&p=1510742&viewfull=1#post1510742
jaybee
5th August 2022, 01:15
.
Alex responds to the $4.2 million Sandy Hook verdict...
https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-exclusive-alex-jones-responds-to-4-2-million-sandy-hook-verdict/
The family being used/weaponized by corrupt authorities to try and get rid of InfoWars and Alex Jones were claiming $150 million... so this is considered to be a kind of victory -
The judge, (who spookily even looks like a member of the Adams Family) is clearly politicized and totally under control of the Deep State Players....
Johnnycomelately
5th August 2022, 04:45
Some interesting new-to-me stuff in that vid, and good to hear the re-cap.
Not being surprised, or much dismayed, it still is bittersweet knowing.
I have always wondered. Why is the Sandy Hook topic so taboo. Even in alternative media, it is not much talked about. Every other shooting or conspiracy has its share of airtime, but Sandy Hook has always been very taboo to discuss. Is it just me or there is something especially weird with Sandy Hook?
Of all the things Alex Jones said over the years, Sandy Hook was the thing that got him deplatformed and a major lawsuit on his hands that forced him to walk back on his position.
Is it because “they” really dropped the ball on their execution of the Sandy Hook psyop? Or is it that they revealed too much of the black magic/satanic ritualism through this psyop, they were too transparent?
Am I the only one who feels that way?
I think that Sandy Hook is NOT at all what was presented. I still think this is the best video I saw about the "reality created"
tFd5xSkSkCXb/
ExomatrixTV
5th August 2022, 17:23
Alex Jones Clears the Air on Sandy Hook
piMWpBo4Zew
T Smith
5th August 2022, 17:37
Alex Jones must pay at least $4.1 million to parents of a Sandy Hook school massacre victim in defamation case, jury rules
By Safia Samee Ali
8/4/22
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alex-jones-must-pay-41-million-parents-sandy-hook-school-massacre-vict-rcna41493
"Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose son Jesse died in the 2012 attack, had sought damages for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
An Austin jury on Thursday decided Infowars host Alex Jones must pay at least $4.1 million to the family of a 6-year-old killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting for the suffering he and his website and broadcast caused them by spreading lies about the 2012 massacre.
Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose son Jesse died alongside 19 of his classmates and six educators at the school in Newtown, Connecticut, had sought $150 million for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
An attorney for Jones, who has repeatedly suggested that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, asked jurors to award Heslin and Lewis only $1.
The jury was only asked to decide whether Jones, who has already been found liable by a judge because he did not hand over critical evidence before the trial began, must also pay Jesse's parents for the emotional distress and reputational damage caused by his false claims. The jury will also decide whether to award punitive damages. The panel will hear testimony on that subject Friday.
The trial included testimony from both parents and Jones, who has portrayed the lawsuit as an attack on his First Amendment rights. Following the shooting, he had asserted that it was fabricated and included crisis actors. He later acknowledged that it took place.
His attorney, Andino Reynal, argued that Jones has paid for his mistake by losing millions of followers after he was removed from social media platforms in 2018.
“He made a terrible mistake,” Reynal told jurors, referring to Jones. “That mistake was weaponized by the same political forces that had descended upon Sandy Hook when it happened.” "
(It sounds like Alex Jones really dug himself into a deep hole (possibly including perjury) with this trial.)
oioJoodTT2A
9Juv25ZUEu0
Also posted here:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1 13363-BREAKING-NEWS-Continuously-Updated&p=1510742&viewfull=1#post1510742
I watched nearly all the testimony. Which was painful. Alex Jones was much too apologetic and continually repeated, "I think it was 100% real, I was wrong, people died..." Be that as it may, is he not entitled to think differently? Whether children died was never the point (Jones reported repeatedly, over and over again, five years prior, that he concluded children had died. Why are we still talking about this? Answer: because the MSM is...). People died on 9/11. That doesn't mean 9/11 wasn't a false flag or a synthetic event whose objective was to manipulate public perception and advance an ulterior agenda. In other words, that children died or didn't die is but a subset to a much larger point, that being the events at Sandy Hook are not as 2-dimensional and organic as told by the Ministry of Truth...
Even though this is a relatively small settlement, this is a horrible precedent. This trial isn't about Sandy Hook. Investigating conspiracies is what is really on trail here. Is getting to the bottom of conspiracies to be illegal now? Or subject to law suits and punitive damages? Wow. Just wow. Apparently the social engineering class can now run roughshod over their mind-controlled subjects with full immunity.
Yes, Alex Jones questioned what happened at Sandy Hook. So what? Why is he continually apologizing for that? That is what he and his platform does. His lawyers did a horrible job, in my opinion, defending this. In my view, Jones' defense team should have erected a defense on the grounds of the following bullet points:
Yes, Infowars questioned the events of Sandy Hook trying to unveil the truth. That's what we do...
Yes, getting at the truth is sometimes painful, can appear insensitive and disrespecting, and is often offensive, especially to those who maintain a conflicting version of truth
Yes, investigating conspiracies and official coverups sometimes yeilds false conclusions, especially when investigating powerful interests that specialize in obfuscation, deceit, and propaganda.
Yes, at one point Infowars questioned whether children died. We considered this possibility because the official story does not add up. Period. As we learned more, we have since retracted that position. Repeatedly. The caricature of InfoWars position on Sandy Hook (which is really what is on trail here) is fully fabricated by the MSM. We apology if some of our initial reporting--and the caricature since created of us--hurt the families of the loved ones that perished, but we do not apology for questioning a spurious narrative. Again, that's what we do....
Investigating conspiracies, and specifically conspiracies where evidence suggests governments and powerful interests are its architects is essential to a free society. This investigative-type of reporting should not be tacitly taboo, illegal, or subject to punitive recompense.
If the families are subject to defamation and harm, the damages came from the media's caricature of Infowars and of its reporting and of its conclusions on Sandy Hook. Why is Alex Jones on trial for a false caricature of him created by the MSM? Who is really responsible for the family's harm?
Way too much backpedaling and apologizing on the stand, IMHO. Alex Jones had the aura of man who was not only wrong, but also guilty.
onawah
5th August 2022, 17:56
It's not over yet for Alex Jones--much yet to come
Jury Finds Alex Jones Must Pay $4.1 Million to Parents of Sandy Hook Victim
by Mimi Nguyen Ly
Aug 4, 2022
https://www.ntd.com/jury-finds-alex-jones-must-pay-4-1-million-to-parents-of-sandy-hook-victim_819834.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2022-08-05
"A Texas jury on Aug. 4 ordered Alex Jones, founder and host of the Infowars radio show and webcast, to pay $4.1 million to the parents of a boy killed in the Sandy Hook mass shooting, marking the first time he has been held financially liable for spreading the false claim that the shooting was a hoax.
Sandy Hook refers to the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, when 20-year-old Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people—20 of whom were children between 6 and 7 years old—at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012.
Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, separated parents of slain 6-year-old Jesse Lewis, had sought at least $150 million in compensatory damages from Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems LLC—Infowars’ parent company—for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The 12-person jury’s verdict came after a two-week trial in Austin, Texas, where Jones’s radio show and webcast Infowars are based. The $4.1 million amount is significantly less than what the parents had sought.
“We are very pleased with the verdict, and we are looking forward to the punitive damages phase that starts tomorrow,” Kyle Farrar, an attorney for the parents, told Reuters in an email on Aug. 4. Lawyers for Jones did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Jones called the reduced award “a major victory” in a video posted on his website late on Aug. 4.
“I admitted I was wrong. I admitted it was a mistake. I admitted that I followed disinformation but not on purpose. I apologized to the families. And the jury understood that,” he said. “What I did to those families was wrong. But I didn’t do it on purpose.”
He added that the award was “more money than my company and I personally have, but we are going to work on trying to make restitution on that.
Mark Bankston, an attorney for the parents, said that the $4.1 million will be only part of what Jones will have to pay.
“We aren’t done folks,” he said on Aug. 4. “We knew coming into this case it was necessary to shoot for the moon to get the jury to understand we were serious and passionate. After tomorrow, he’s going to owe a lot more.”
The jury will next consider the parents’ request for $75 million in punitive damages from Jones for spreading falsehoods about the mass shooting. The deliberations in the second phase of the damages trial are expected to start on Aug. 5.
Sandy Hook ‘100 Percent Real’: Jones
Jones had previously spread the false claim that the mainstream media and gun-control activists worked together to fabricate the Sandy Hook shooting, and that crisis actors were involved in staging the shooting.
During the trial, Jones conceded that the attack was “100 percent real” and that it was “crazy” of him to have spread the false claim. Jones was the only witness to testify in his defense, and he attended the trial sporadically while still appearing on his show.
Attorneys for the parents in an opening statement said that Jones led a “vile campaign of defamation” by spreading the false claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax. “Mr. Jones was continually churning out this idea that Sandy Hook was fake,” Bankston told jurors, referring to Jones as “patient zero” for the hoax theory.
The parents told the jury that an apology wouldn’t be enough, and asked the jurors to order Jones to compensate for the years of suffering they and other Sandy Hook families endured.
Heslin and Lewis testified that after their son died, they faced more trauma over the years, including gunshots fired at a home, threats online and via the phone—including death threats—and harassment on the street by strangers.
The parents said the threats and harassments were by people who believed in Jones’s false hoax theory, and that those people had falsely believed that the parents were lying about their son’s death.
A forensic psychiatrist testified that the parents suffer from “complex post-traumatic stress disorder” due to ongoing trauma, similar to what a soldier at war or a child abuse victim might experience.
A lawyer for Jones acknowledged during his opening statement that Infowars had spread false information. He said Jones lost millions of viewers after being banned in 2018 from major social media and streaming platforms—including Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and Spotify—for hate speech and abusive behavior over the Sandy Hook false claim.
“He regrets what he did, and he’s paying a price for it,” said Jones’s lead attorney, Federico Andino Reynal.
During his closing argument, Reynal said that while Jones and Infowars had reported “irresponsibly” on Sandy Hook, Jones was not responsible for the harassment the parents faced.
Jones said during his testimony that he had tried to correct his hoax claims, but “[the media] won’t let me take it back.”
Separately, in a surprising development, lawyers for the parents said on Aug. 3 that Jones’s lawyers had inadvertently sent them two years’ worth of texts and failed to request them back in time.
Judge Maya Guerra Gamble denied Jones’s motion for a mistrial. Jones’s lawyer argued that attorneys for the parents should have destroyed the texts immediately.
Now, the parents can use the records as they wish.
Bankston used the texts to undercut Jones’s testimony during cross-examination on Aug. 3. Bankston also said in court on Aug. 4 that the U.S. House Jan. 6 Committee has requested the records and that he intends to comply.
Finances
Jurors are set to hear more arguments and evidence from both sides about Jones and his company’s finances on Aug. 5. A finance expert is set to testify for the parents.
Jones’s media company, Free Speech Systems LLC, declared bankruptcy last week. During a broadcast on Aug. 1, Jones said that the filing will help the company stay on the air while it appeals.
Gamble admonished Jones on Aug. 2 for not telling the truth during his testimony when he said he was bankrupt and had complied with the parents’ request for information prior to the trial. “It seems absurd to instruct you again that you must tell the truth while you testify. Yet here I am,” she said.
Heslin and Lewis joined other Sandy Hook parents in urging a judge to block Free Speech Systems from sending Jones or his companies any money until they get to the bottom of their finances.
The parents allege that Jones took $62 million from the company while burdening it with $65 million in “fabricated” debt owed to PQPR Holdings, a company owned by Jones and his parents.
Jones was set to stand trial in a similar suit in Connecticut in September brought by the families of other Sandy Hook victims and an FBI agent who worked on the case. But the case is now on hold while the bankruptcy proceeds.
Jones also faces another trial in Austin, Texas."
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
From The Epoch Times
norman
2nd July 2024, 06:49
Man Discovers Sandy Hook “Hero’s List” matches last names of lottery winners
jICXcZePpRs
Arcturian108
2nd July 2024, 16:18
I don't know what they threatened Alex Jones with, but he should have stood his guns, and claimed that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School was staged. Our court system is so corrupt at this point that who knows what happened during his trial?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.